Sinus nodal responses to atrial extrastimuli in patients without apparent sinus node disease.

In 36 patients without sinus node disease scanning with an atrial extrastimulus (A2) was performed during sinus rhythm with the sinus cycle length measured in milliseconds. Zones of nonreset due to interference, reset, interpolation and sinus echoes were defined by noting the timing of the first response after A2. Zones were defined in terms of their longest and shortest A1-A2 coupling intervals (in milliseconds). A zone of nonreset was found in 12 of 12 patients in whom A2 was delivered late. The mean cycle length in these 12 patients was 779 msec, with a mean zone of nonreset of 779 to 585 msec (25 percent of cycle length). All 36 patients (100 percent) had a zone of reset. The mean cycle length in these 36 patients was 803 msec with a zone of reset from 692 to 319 msec (46 percent of cycle length). Seven of 36 patients (19 percent) had a zone of interpolation. The mean cycle length in these seven patients was 754 msec, with a mean zone of interpolation of 344 to 279 (9 percent of cycle length). Four of 36 patients (11 percent) had a zone of sinus echoes. The mean cycle length in these four patients was 870 msec, with a mean zone of echoes from 350 to 313 msec (4 percent of cycle length). Calculated sinoatrial conduction time ranged from 40 to 153 msec (mean +/- standard deviation 92 +/- 30 msec). Shortening of the cycle length with atrial pacing increased the number of patients with zones of interpolation and echoes. In conclusion, zones of nonreset and reset are found in all patients with normal sinus nodal function, whereas zones of interpolation and echoes are much less common. Sinoatrial conduction time is surprisingly long in patients without apparent sinus node disease.     

Electrophysiologic effects of atropine on human sinus node and atrium.

Electrophysiologic studies were conducted in 17 patients without apparent sinus node disease before and after intravenous administration of 1 to 2 mg of atropine. Mean values in milliseconds (+/- standard error of the mean) before and after administration of atropine were as follows: sinus cycle length 846 +/- 26.4 versus 647 +/- 20.0 (P less than 0.001); sinus nodal recovery time 1,029 +/- 37 versus 774 +/- 36 (P less than 0.001); mean calculated sinoatrial (S-A) conduction time 103 +/- 5.7 versus 58 +/- 3.9 (P less than 0.001); mean P-A interval 34 +/- 1.5 msec versus 31 +/- 1.5 (P less than 0.05); mean atrial effective and functional refractory periods during sinus rhythm 285 +/- 11.3 versus 238 +/- 7.9 and 331 +/0 11.6 versus 280 +/- 8.6, respectively (P less than 0.001 for both); mean atrial effective and functional refractory periods measured at equivalent driven cycle length 239 +/- 7.7 versus 213 +/- 7.4 and 277 +/- 11.4 versus 245 +/- 9.5, respectively (P less than 0.001 for both). In conclusion, atropine shortened sinus cycle length, sinus nodal recovery time and calculated S-A conduction time. The shortening of atrial refractory periods with atropine implies that vagotonia prolongs atrial refractoriness in man.     

Electrophysiologic effects of intravenous metoprolol

We evaluated the electrophysiologic effects of intravenous metoprolol, a selective beta-1-blocking agent, in 12 patients. Electrophysiologic parameters were measured during the control period, immediately following, and 4 to 6 hours after infusion of 0.15 mg/kg. Metoprolol serum concentration was serially measured in 6 of the 12 patients. Immediately after metoprolol infusion, the sinus cycle length increased by 20% from 738 +/- 166 msec to 885 +/- 181 msec (p less than 0.01), AH interval during sinus rhythm increased by 34% from 83 +/- 27 msec to 112 +/- 37 msec (p less than 0.01), and antegrade atrioventricular (AV) nodal Wenckebach cycle length increased by 20% from 360 +/- 188 msec to 432 +/- 199 msec (p less than 0.01). Sinus node recovery time and sinoatrial conduction time did not become abnormally prolonged in any patient. His-Purkinje conduction was unaltered. High atrial and ventricular refractory periods were modestly increased (less than 15 msec); the increase in refractoriness reached statistical significance when repeat measurements were made at 4 to 6 hours. No adverse effects were noted. Metoprolol serum concentration at the time of peak measured electrophysiologic effect was 54.6 +/- 15.2 ng/ml. We conclude that at this dose, intravenous metoprolol significantly prolongs sinus cycle length and AV nodal conduction, may modestly increase atrial and ventricular refractoriness, and appears to have electrophysiologic potency similar to propranolol. It is well tolerated following intravenous administration and may be of particular value in the acute treatment of supraventricular tachycardia when beta-receptor selectivity is desired.     

Sinus nodal echoes. Clinical case report and canine studies

Sinus nodal echoes are illustrated in (1) a case report, and (2) a study of the effects of atrial premature beats after atrial drive in dogs. When atrial premature beats confront the sinus node while it is still refractory, 3 types of response may be seen: (1) Complete interpolation—the subsequent sinus beat (or escape) comes precisely at the expected time; (2) incomplete interpolation—the subsequent sinus beat is delayed; and (3) sinus echoes—the sinus beat appears earlier than expected. In all 3 instances the node is entered, but the pacemaker fails to be reset. Although the echo has the form of a sinus beat, it is followed by a pause, presumably as a result of repenetration of the sinus node through pathways unused during exit. The curves characterizing the expansion by vagal stimulation of the nodal refractory period and total echo circuit time are defined, together with the latency of cholinergic effect on nodal refractoriness, sinus automaticity and exit conduction of the echo. The secondary concealment zone of a completely interpolated atrial premature beat is established. Atrial preexcitation (before the echo) sometimes evokes a second echo. The limiting factor on sustained sinoatrial reciprocation thus appears to be total echo circuit time rather than refractoriness of atrium or echo entrance pathways. The repetitive echoes seen in this study may be the basis for some clinical cases of sinus or atrial tachycardia.     

Comparative study of sinoatrial conduction time and sinus node recovery time.

Atrial stimulation were performed in 5 normal patients (group A) and 4 patients with electrocardiographic evidence of sinoatrial disease (group B). The technique of premature atrial stimulation was used to calculate sinoatrial conduction time. Rapid atrial pacing was applied to measure maximum sinus node recovery time. In 4 cases both stimulation methods were repeated after intravenous administration of atropine Group A had a sinoatrial conduction time of 56 ms +/- 11 (SD) and a maximum sinus node recovery time of 1122 ms +/- 158. In 3 out of 4 patients with sinus node dysfunction a prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time could be demonstrated (145, 105, and 150 ms). In addition, one showed probable sinus node exit block after premature atrial stimulation. Sinus node recovery time was excessively prolonged in 2 (3880 and 3215 ms) and normal in the other 2 patients with sinoatrial disease (1330 and 1275 ms). Atropine leads to a decrease of sinoatrial conduction time. Results indicate that sinus node recovery time may not be a reliable indicator of sinus node automaticity if sinoatrial conduction is disturbed. The premature atrial stimulation technique makes it possible to study the pattern of sinoatrial conduction and to evaluate its reaction to therapeutic drugs.     

Comparative study of sinoatrial conduction time and sinus node recovery time.

Atrial stimulation were performed in 5 normal patients (group A) and 4 patients with electrocardiographic evidence of sinoatrial disease (group B). The technique of premature atrial stimulation was used to calculate sinoatrial conduction time. Rapid atrial pacing was applied to measure maximum sinus node recovery time. In 4 cases both stimulation methods were repeated after intravenous administration of atropine Group A had a sinoatrial conduction time of 56 ms +/- 11 (SD) and a maximum sinus node recovery time of 1122 ms +/- 158. In 3 out of 4 patients with sinus node dysfunction a prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time could be demonstrated (145, 105, and 150 ms). In addition, one showed probable sinus node exit block after premature atrial stimulation. Sinus node recovery time was excessively prolonged in 2 (3880 and 3215 ms) and normal in the other 2 patients with sinoatrial disease (1330 and 1275 ms). Atropine leads to a decrease of sinoatrial conduction time. Results indicate that sinus node recovery time may not be a reliable indicator of sinus node automaticity if sinoatrial conduction is disturbed. The premature atrial stimulation technique makes it possible to study the pattern of sinoatrial conduction and to evaluate its reaction to therapeutic drugs.     

Electrophysiologic evaluation of sinus node function in patients with sinus node dysfunction.

Twenty patients of mean age 66.2 years, with suspected sinus node dysfunction, underwent extensive electrophysiologic study. Sinus bradycardia (18), sinus pauses (3), and sinoatrial block (1) were identified in their ECGs prior to study. Also 11 patients had some abnormality of atrioventricular nodal and/or intraventricular conduction prior to study. At the time of electrophysiological study, 10/20 patients (50%) had a mean cycle length exceeding 1000 msec, and mean P-V interval exceeded 210 msec in 7/20 (35%). The estimated "sinoatrial conduction time" exceeded 215 msec in 6/16 (38%) patients. The maximum first escape cycle following pacing at six different rates exceeded a value equal 1.3 X the mean value of the control cycle length + 101 msec (slope of regression line + Y intercept + 1 SD) in 13/9 (68%) patients. Nineteen patients received 1 mg atropine intravenously and mean cycle length decreased by 19%, from 891 +/- 175.8 msec to 718 +/- 182.9 msec. Graded infusion of isoproterenol was employed in 19 patients; four patients required an infusion rate greater than 28.3 ng/kg/min to produce a 20% decrease in spontaneous sinus cycle length. These data would indicate that a variety of interventions are required to characterize the disturbance of sinus node automaticiy and sinoatrial conduction in patients with sinus node dysfunction.     

Electrophysiologic effects of atropine on sinus node and atrium in patients with sinus nodal dysfunction

Electrophysiologic studies were conducted in 21 patients with sinus nodal dysfunction before and after intravenous administration of 1 to 2 mg of atropine. The mean sinus cycle length (± standard error of the mean) was 1,171 ± 35 msec before and 806 ± 29 msec after administration of atropine (P < 0.001). Mean sinus nodal recovery time determined at a paced rate of 130/min and maximal recovery time were, respectively, 1,426 ± 75 and 1,690 ± 100 msec before and 1,169 ± 90 and 1,311 ± 111 msec after atropine (P < 0.001 and < 0.001). Mean calculated sinoatrial conduction time, measured in 16 patients, was 113 ± 8 msec before and 105 ± 9.7 msec after atropine (difference not significant). Mean atrial effective refractory period, measured at an equivalent driven cycle length, was 262 ± 11.1 msec before and 256 ± 10.3 msec after atropine (not significant). Mean atrial functional refractory period was 302 ± 12.5 msec before and 295 ± 11.3 msec after atropine (not significant).

The shortening of sinus cycle length and sinus recovery time with atropine was similar to that noted in patients without sinus nodal dysfunction. In contrast, atropine had insignificant effects on sinoatrial conduction and atrial refractoriness in this group whereas it shortens both in normal subjects. This finding may reflect altered perinodal and atrial electrophysiologic properties in patients with sinus node disease.     

The effect of atropine on calculated sinoatrial conduction time in man.

This study investigates the effect of atropine on the length of the return cycles after premature atrial stimulation in man. On the assumption that sinus node automaticity is not changed by premature depolarization of the sinus node, sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) was calculated from the differences between the length of the return cycles and the spontaneous cycle length. 11 patients were studied before and after the injection of atropine. In all cases atropine caused an increase in heart rate. In 8 patients the return cycles exhibited a typical behavior. In 6 patients without signs of sinus node dysfunction, the mean calculated SACT was 109 msec, whereas 2 patients with a sick sinus syndrome (SSS) had a mean calculated SACT of 190 and 225 msec, respectively. 3 patients with SSS demonstrated an atypical pattern of the postextrasystolic pauses. In 6 patients without sinus node dysfunction, atropine caused a reduction of calculated SACT about 35%. In 2 patients with SSS the reduction was 38 and 49% of the control value, respectively, whereas in the remaining 3 patients with SSS who had an atypical return cycle pattern, a normalization occurred after the administration of atropine. We conclude that, besides its effects on sinus node automaticity, atropine has also a marked effect on sinoatrial conduction, even in patients with the sick sinus syndrome.     

New application of direct sinus node recordings in man: assessment of sinus node recovery time

Sinus node recovery time (SNRT) is frequently used to assess sinus node function in patients with suspected sick sinus syndrome (SSS). Although SNRT is assumed to reflect sinus node automaticity, this assumption remains unproven. The purpose of this study was (1) to test the hypothesis that SNRT in patients with and without SSS reflects sinus node automaticity, and (2) to assess the role of sinoatrial conduction time in the measurement of SNRT. A total of 16 patients (mean +/- SD age 63 +/- 9 years), seven of which had SSS, form the basis of this report. An electrogram of the sinus node was obtained for each of the 16 patients, and overdrive pacing was performed in each at cycle lengths of 1000 to 300 msec. SNRT was measured (1) on the sinus node electrogram (direct method, measuring SNRTd) as the interval from the last pacing stimulus artifact to the onset of the upstroke slope of first postpacing sinus beat and (2) on the high right atrial electrogram (indirect method, measuring SNRTi). Results were as follows: (1) The longest SNRTd was significantly shorter than the longest SNRTi (989 +/- 304 vs 1309 +/- 356 msec, p less than .001). (2) For the first postpacing sinus beat there was a significant prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time as compared with that for sinus beats before pacing (319 +/- 152 vs 99 +/- 35 msec, p less than .001). Sinoatrial conduction time normalized within 3.6 +/- 0.96 postpacing sinus beats. (3) At the pacing cycle length that resulted in the longest recovery time, sinus node depression was seen in 56% of patients, sinus node acceleration was noted in 26%, and no appreciable change in sinus node automaticity was observed in 19%. (4) Sinoatrial conduction time for the sinus beat before pacing and that for the first postpacing beat was longer in patients with SSS when compared with in patients without SSS. (5) In patients with SSS the abnormal SNRTi, when corrected for the degree of prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time for the first postpacing beat, became normal in five of six patients. We conclude that (1) SNRTi reflects both sinus node automaticity and sinoatrial conduction time, whereas SNRTd reflects sinus node automaticity, (2) overdrive atrial pacing results in marked prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time for the first postpacing beat, which is longer in patients with SSS when compared with in those without SSS, and (3) in patients with SSS the inference of abnormal sinus node automaticity on the basis of a prolonged corrected SNRTi is usually incorrect.     

The effect of premature atrial depolarization on sinus node automaticity in man.

Sino-atrial conduction time (SACT) may be calculated from the difference between the length of the return cycle and the spontaneous cycle, using programmed premature atrial stimulation during spontaneous sinus rhythm. This approach to sinoatrial conduction assumes that sinus node automaticity is not changed by premature depolarization. In order to validate this assumption, we compared the length of the post-return cycles to the spontaneous cycle length in 71 patients. Patients were grouped according to clinical diagnosis and the value of calculated SACT. At long coupling intervals at which no reset of the sinus node occurred there was only a small prolongation of the post-return cycles (less than 8.4 msec, on an average) compared to the spontaneous cycle length. This suggests no or only an insignificant effect of premature depolarization on the sinus node. However, during test stimuli leading to reset of the sinus node, the post-return cycles were significantly prolonged between 20 to 30 msec, on an average. The response of the individual cases sometimes varied to a great extent. In patients who demonstrated a progressive linear prolongation of the return cycles at decremental shortening of the test interval, there was no significant prolongation of the post-return cycles versus the spontaneous cycle length. We conclude that 1) premature depolarization of the sinus node may have a depressant effect on sinus node automaticity, which, if present, is usually small; 2) calculation of SACT using the extrastimulus technique may overestimate true SACT.     

Comparative study of two methods of estimating sinoatrial conduction time in man

Programmed premature atrial stimulation has been widely used to estimate sinoatrial conduction time in man. A proposed new approach uses continuous atrial pacing just above the spontaneous cycle length. Sinoatrial conduction time is represented by the difference between the first cycle after pacing and the spontaneous cycle length, assuming that sinus nodal automaticity is undisturbed by continuous atrial pacing.

Both techniques were compared in 23 consecutive patients. Mean (± standard deviation) sinoatrial conduction time was 113 ± 27 msec estimated with the premature stimulus technique and 96 ± 48 msec when estimated with the continuous pacing technique. In about 30 percent of cases the two values corresponded well with each other. In the remaining patients sinoatrial conduction time estimated with the premature stimulus technique was longer than the time estimated with continuous atrial pacing. Additionally, the latter was estimated at two different rates of pacing in which the cycle length was 30 and 60 msec, respectively, shorter than the previous cycle length. The estimate then increased to 119 ± 39 and 136 ± 40 msec, respectively. Sinoatrial conduction time estimated with continuous atrial pacing did not depend on spontaneous cycle length and did not correlate with sinus nodal recovery time. The cycles after the first pause were slightly longer than the spontaneous cycle length.

The results suggest that data from the two techniques cannot be easily compared and that premature atrial stimulation may exert a more depressive effect on sinus nodal automaticity than continuous atrial pacing. The observed differences in results may also be due to a more pronounced delay of retrograde conduction during premature atrial stimulation than during continuous atrial pacing. It is also possible that continuous atrial pacing leads to some overdrive exciting effect on the sinus node, although the opposite effect is suggested by the response of the cycles after the first postpacing cycle. A final conclusion regarding the validity of each technique cannot be reached on the basis of these clinical data.     

Electrophysiologic effects of lidocaine on sinus node and atrium in patients with and without sinoatrial dysfunction

Electrophysiological studies were conducted in 13 patients with normal sinus node function and 14 with sinus node dysfunction before and after intravenous lidocaine. Mean +/- SEM sinus cycle length significantly shortened from 810 +/- 34.3 to 774 +/- 34.3 msec in patients with normal sinus node (P less than 0.001) and from 1061 +/- 67.6 to 1016 +/- 64.5 msec in patients with sinus node dysfunction (P less than 0.025) after lidocaine. Mean sinus recovery time was 1027 +/- 49.4 before and 1026 +/- 52.5 msec after lidocaine in patients with normal sinus node (NS) and 1269 +/- 97.7 before and 1170 +/- 73.8 msec after lidocaine in patients with sinus node dysfunction (P less than 0.05). Mean calculated sinoatrial conduction time was 87 +/- 9.5 before and 90 +/- 9.2 msec after lidocaine in patients with normal sinus node (NS) and 80 +/- 10.3 before and 96 +/- 10.2 msec after lidocaine in patients with sinus node dysfunction (P less than 0.001). Mean atrial effective and functional refractory periods were not significantly changed with lidocaine. Thus lidocaine shortened sinus cycle length in both groups, without affecting atrial refractoriness. Lidocaine appeared to depress perinodal tissue only in patients with sinus node dysfunction. The abbreviation of sinus recovery time in patients with sinus node dysfunction could reflect increased sinus automaticity and/or increased perinodal refractoriness, allowing entrance block to occur. This mechanism may explain why sinus arrest has been noted in some patients during lidocaine administration.     

The measurement of sinus node refractoriness in man

We recently described a method for measuring sinus node refractoriness in the rabbit heart. Atrial premature beats either may result in reset return responses or may become interpolated because of encroachment on sinus node refractoriness. In previous studies with rabbits we defined the effective refractory period of the sinus node (SNERP) as the longest premature interval that is interpolated. This study presents results on the extension of this technique to the measurement of sinus node refractoriness in man. Out of 30 patients (12 with and 18 without sinus node dysfunction), SNERP could be measured in 26 at one or more basic cycle lengths. At a basic pacing cycle length of 600 msec, SNERP ranged from 250 to 380 msec (mean 325 +/- 39) in patients without sinus node dysfunction and from 500 to 550 msec (mean 522 +/- 20) in patients with sinus node dysfunction. This clear differentiation of patients with and without sinus node dysfunction by SNERP is in contrast to various results obtained by assessing sinus node function from sinus node recovery time and sinoatrial conduction time. Thus this study suggests the possible use of the measurement of SNERP in the assessment of sinus node function in man and its possible value in identifying patients with sinus node dysfunction.     

Assessment of sinus node function in patients with congenital long QT syndrome

Sinus node function was evaluated in 4 patients with congenital long QT syndrome suffering from recurrent episodes of syncope and ventricular arrhythymias. Three of the 4 patients had bradycardia at rest on a 24-hour ECG. Sinus node function was examined by the atrial overdrive suppression test and the atrial premature stimulation test. Corrected sinus node recovery time (CSNRT) was prolonged in all patients. Total sinoatrial conduction time was also prolonged in 2 of the 4 patients. In all patients with abnormally high values, these values returned to normal after atropine administration, except in one patient. His prolonged CSNRT remained high after atropine administration, indicating abnormal automaticity such as that seen in sick sinus syndrome. These results show that sinus node function in congenital long QT syndrome is often associated with autonomic dysfunction, and sometimes with intrinsic disturbances of sinoatrial conduction.     

Programmed atrial stimulation in the study of sinoatrial conduction in normal subjects (author's transl)]

Sinoatrial conduction was investigated in 18 normal subjects, using premature atrial depolarizations. The results obtained in this investigation were evaluated plotting the test cycle (expressed as difference between the basic sinus cycle and the test cycle as a percentage of the basic sinus cycle) as a function of the return cycle (expressed as difference between the return cycle and the basic cycle as a percentage of the basic sinus cycle). In normal subjects, premature atrial depolarizations elicited in the last 10-20% of the spontaneous sinus cycle, produced a progressive prolongation of the return cycle and the points correlating the return cycle index to the test cycle index fell above the diagonal of the plotting system. After earlier premature atrial stimulations, the return cycle stayed the same length, and the points correlating the return cycle index to the test cycle index fell along a line parallel to "y" axis (plateau). The mean value of the returning cycle (expressed as above) corresponding to the test cycles (evaluated as above) included in the first 5% of the "plateau" can be defined as the "sinoatrial conduction index". This index, the sum of conduction into and out of the sinus node, ranged from 79 msec to 187 msec. By assuming similar anterograde and retrograde conduction, the sinoatrial conduction time ranged from 39.5 msec to 97.5 msec (mean value 70 msec).     

Sinus node electric activity in prolonged atrial pauses in subjects with the sick sinus syndrome

Sinus node electrogram (SNE) was recorded in 15 patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) in which prolonged atrial pauses were observed. The aim of this study was clarify the physiopathological mechanisms underlying atrial pauses as well as to evaluate the sensitivity of sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) directly measured on SNE and of SACT estimated with the indirect Strauss method with respect to the detection of SSS. The following results were obtained: Sinus electrical activity was recorded during atrial pauses (greater than or equal to 2 basic sinus cycle length) in all the 9 patients in which the pauses spontaneously occurred and in the 2 patients in whom the pauses of 2860 and 3190 msec were induced by atrial pacing. In one of these latter two patients, moreover, a complete electrical desynchronization was observed. In the remaining 4 patients in whom, pauses (greater than or equal to 3 sec) were induced by carotid sinus massage of in 3 no sinus electrical activity was detected on SNE while in 1 advanced sinus node desynchronization was observed. Direct sinoatrial conduction time was abnormally prolonged in 6 patients with SSS and indirect sinoatrial conduction time in 9 patients.     

A second zone of compensation during atrial premature stimulation: Evidence for decremental conduction in the sinoatrial junction

125 consecutive patients with premature atrial stimulation were studied. Three demonstrated sinus node return cycles that were fully compensatory following premature atrial stimuli delivered early in diastole. This second zone of compensation was unaccompanied by significant alterations in the post-return cycle lengths or in P-wave morphology of the return cycle. To account for the occurrence of a complete compensatory pause following very early premature atrial depolarizations, we consider the possibility that retrograde conduction of the early atrial premature depolarization (APD) in the sinoatrial junction was delayed for a sufficient length of time to allow the sinus node to depolarize spontaneously on schedule. Collision between the APD and sinus beat would then occur despite the marked prematurity of the APD. Thus, the early APD had encountered the relative refractory period of the sinoatrial junction, suggesting that decrementai conduction takes place within the sinoatrial region in man. These findings imply that there is the potential for reentry in the region of the human sinoatrial junction.     

The estimation of sinoatrial conduction time in rabbit heart by the constant atrial pacing technique.

This study compared estimates of sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) obtained by constant atrial pacing (CAP) and premature atrial stimulation (PAS) with measured SACT in isolated rabbit right atrial preparations. Transmembrane potentials and surface electrograms were recorded from the sinus node and crista terminalis, respectively. The crista terminalis was paced 5, 10 and 15 beats/min faster than the spontaneous sinus rate with a train of eight pulses. Estimate of SACT by CAP was taken as the difference between the first atrial return cycle and the mean spontaneous cycle length. SACTs at 5, 10 and 15 beats/min faster were 76 +/- 10, 86 +/- 10 and 96 +/- 10 msec (mean +/- SEM; n = 12), respectively; correlation coefficients with the true SACT were 0.7, 0.54 and 0.4. Consecutive determinations of SACT by PAS and CAP in the same preparation (n = 6) at 10 beats/min faster gave SACTs of 86 +/- 13 and 79 +/- 14 msec, respectively, compared with true SACTs of 79 +/- 10 msec. Shortening of sinus node action potential, depression of automaticity and shifts in the site of the primary pacemaker contributed to the errors in both techniques. Estimation of SACT by CAP may be further complicated by failure of sinus node capture. Principles to minimize some of these errors are also presented.     

Assessment of sinus node function in asymptomatic subjects with sinus bradycardia and in symptomatic patients with sino-atrial disease.

Sinus node function was evaluated in 18 patients with sinus bradycardia without complaints (Group I), in 16 patients with sinus bradycardia and/or sinoatrial block with complaints (subgroup IIa) and in 14 patients with the bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome (subgroup IIb). Mean values of corrected sinus node recovery time (CSRT), atrial effective refractory period (AERP) and atrial functional refractory period (AFRP) differentiated significatively asymptomatic subjects of group I from the two subgroups of patients with sinoatrial disease, but failed to differentiate each subgroup from the other one. There was no significative difference in mean sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) between group I and each of the two subgroups. Three patients of subgroup IIa and 1 patient of subgroup IIb had a false negative response after both overdrive and premature programmed atrial pacing. Spontaneous cycle length was directly correlated with the sinus node recovery time and the atrial refractoriness in group I, and with the only sinus node recovery time in subgroup IIb. No direct correlations were observed in subgroup IIa. This suggests a less disturbed sinus node automaticity in bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome.