Comparison of DEB-TACE and cTACE for the initial treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma beyond up-to-seven criteria: A single-center propensity score matching analysis

PurposeTo evaluate clinical outcomes of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with CalliSpheres microspheres and conventional TACE (cTACE) as the initial treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond up-to-seven criteria.MethodsThe study retrospectively assessed the medical records of HCC patients beyond up-to-seven criteria who received the initial treatment of DEB-TACE or cTACE from June 2016 to December 2019 in our institution. To reduce the patient selection bias, propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups. In addition, prognostic factors affecting PFS and OS were analyzed by univariate and multivariate methods.ResultsA total of 312 eligible HCC patients were included in the study, including 140 patients in the DEB-TACE group and 172 patients in the cTACE group. 110 patients were chosen in each group after PSM analysis and there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics (P > 0.05). Before PSM analysis, DEB-TACE had better ORR and DCR compared to cTACE group (P < 0.05). After PSM analysis, the ORR for DEB-TACE group was still higher than that for cTACE group, while no significant difference in the DCR between the two groups. In addition, DEB-TACE group had better survival benefits than cTACE group before PSM analysis (mPFS: 11.5 months vs 9.0 months, P < 0.001; mOS: 24.0 months vs 19.2 months, P = 0.045). Similarly, after PSM analysis, the median PFS and OS in the DEB-TACE group were still higher than that in the cTACE group (mPFS: 11.1 months vs 9.0 months, P = 0.015; mOS: 25.0 months vs 19.0 months, P = 0.030). Further, the univariate and multivariate analysis indicated that DEB-TACE treatment was a positive prognostic factor for PFS and OS.ConclusionDEB-TACE with CalliSpheres microspheres might be an effective and safe treatment for patients with unresectable HCC beyond up-to-seven criteria.     

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) exhibits superior efficacy and equal tolerance to conventional TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with conventional TACE history

ObjectiveMultiple conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) procedures would cause treatment resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, whether drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) would resolve this issue is a necessary topic. Thus, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between DEB-TACE and cTACE in HCC patients with cTACE treatment history.MethodsTotally, 134 HCC patients with cTACE treatment history were retrospectively reviewed. They were categorized into DEB-TACE group (N = 70) and cTACE group (N = 64) based on the current treatment they received.ResultsAfter 1-month treatment, DEB-TACE group exhibited an elevated objective response rate (ORR) (71.9% vs. 47.3%, P = 0.008) while similar disease control rate (DCR) (93.0% vs. 81.8%, P = 0.074) compared to cTACE group. Besides, after 3-month treatment, DEB-TACE group also displayed higher ORR (68.4% vs. 44.1%, P = 0.038) and DCR (81.6% vs. 58.8%, P = 0.034) compared to cTACE group. Furthermore, the median progression-free survival (PFS) (11.5 months vs. 6.5 months P = 0.014) and overall survival (OS) (18.5 months vs. 13.0 months, P = 0.025) were longer in DEB-TACE group compared to cTACE group. Moreover, DEB-TACE (vs. cTACE) independently correlated with prolonged PFS (P = 0.021) and OS (P = 0.017) after adjustment by multivariate Cox's regression. Besides, most of liver function indexes were similar before and after treatment between these two groups. Also, the commonly observed adverse events were pain, fever, nausea/vomiting and blood pressure elevation with similar incidence between these two groups (all P > 0.050).ConclusionDEB-TACE exhibits superiority over cTACE in HCC patients with cTACE treatment history.     

Nine-year experience of doxorubicin-eluting beads chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Chemoembolization with doxorubucin-eluting beads (DEB) has been used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since 2007. This study compared the efifcacy and sur-vival between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with DEB and conventional approach (cTACE) in HCC treatment.
METHODS: This retrospective case-control study compared the overall survival and tumor response of HCC patients to cTACE (n=190) and DEB (n=143) by the reassessment of com-puted tomography and serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Mul-tivariate analysis was used to determine the factors affecting tumor response.
RESULTS: The median post-treatment to pre-treatment AFP level was 0.8 for a DEB session (n=258) and 1.0 for a cTACE session (n=452), showing a signiifcantly greater decrease in AFP after DEB (P<0.05). More patients in the DEB group achieved objective response (complete and partial) compared with those in the cTACE group (P<0.05). Objective tumor re-sponse after DEB vs cTACE was 34.8% vs 15.4% in 0-3 months (P=0.001), 37.1% vs 20.0% in 3-6 months (P<0.05), and 50.0%vs 30.0% in 6-12 months (P=0.093). DEB predicted a 3.604 times odds of achieving at least one objective tumor response in a patient when compared to cTACE (P<0.0001). The median survival from ifrst transcatheter therapy of patients having undergone at least once DEB was 12.53 months, while those having received cTACE only was 10.53 months (P=0.086). A tendency of improved survival appeared to maintain until >80 months after the ifrst TACE session in the DEB group.
CONCLUSION: DEB is a safe alternative to cTACE in HCC pa-tients with better therapeutic efifcacy.     

Transarterial chemoembolization: Evidences from the literature and applications in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the current standard of care for patients with large or multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), preserved liver function, absence of cancer-related symptoms and no evidence of vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread (i.e., those classified as intermediate stage according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system). The rationale for TACE is that the intra-arterial injection of a chemotherapeutic drug such as doxorubicin or cisplatin followed by embolization of the blood vessel will result in a strong cytotoxic effect enhanced by ischemia. However, TACE is a very heterogeneous operative technique and varies in terms of chemotherapeutic agents, treatment devices and schedule. In order to overcome the major drawbacks of conventional TACE (cTACE), non-resorbable drug-eluting beads (DEBs) loaded with cytotoxic drugs have been developed. DEBs are able to slowly release the drug upon injection and increase the intensity and duration of ischemia while enhancing the drug delivery to the tumor. Unfortunately, despite the theoretical advantages of this new device and the promising results of the pivotal studies, definitive data in favor of its superiority over cTACE are still lacking. The recommendation for TACE as the standard-of-care for intermediate-stage HCC is based on the demonstration of improved survival compared with best supportive care or suboptimal therapies in a meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials, but other therapeutic options (namely, surgery and radioembolization) proved competitive in selected subsets of intermediate HCC patients. Other potential fields of application of TACE in hepato-oncology are the pre-transplant setting (as downstaging/bridging treatment) and the early stage (in patients unsuitable to curative therapy). The potential of TACE in selected advanced patients with segmental portal vein thrombosis and preserved liver function deserves further reports.     

Doxorubicin-eluting bead vs conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation

AIM:To assess the possible effect of two different types of preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE)on recurrence-free survival after liver transplantation(LT)in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)and to analyze the effects of TACE on tumor histology.METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed the histological features of 130 HCC nodules in 63 native livers removed at transplantation.Patients who received any other type of treatment such as radiofrequency tumor ablation,percutaneous ethanol ablation or who were not treated at all were excluded.All patients in the present study were within the Milan Criteria at the last imaging findings before transplantation.Doxorubicineluting bead TACE(DEB-TACE)was performed in 22patients(38 nodules),and conventional TACE(c-TACE)in 16(25 nodules).Patients’and tumors’characteristics were retrospectively reviewed.We performed a pernodule analysis of the explanted livers to establish the mean percentage of necrosis of any nodule treated by TACE(conventional or DEB)and a per-patient analysis to establish the percentage of necrosis in the cumulative tumor area,including 21 nodules not reached by TACE.Inflammatory and fibrotic changes in the tissue surrounding the tumor nodule were analyzed and categorized as poor/absent,moderate and enhanced reaction.Uni-and multivariate analysis of risk factors for HCC-recurrence were performed.RESULTS:The number and diameter of the nodules,the time spent on the waiting list and the number of treatments were similar in the two groups.A trend towards higher appropriate response rates(necrosis≥90%)was observed in the DEB-TACE group(44.7%vs32.0%,P=0.2834).The mean percentage of necrosis in the cumulative tumor area was 58.8%±36.6%in the DEB-TACE group and 50.2%±38.1%in the c-TACE group(P=0.4856).Fibrotic and inflammatory reactions surrounding the tumor nodule were markedly more common in the DEB-TACE group(P<0.0001,for both the parameters).The three-year recurrence-free survival was higher in DEB-TACE-treated patients tha     

Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current state of the art

Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) represents the current gold standard for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) patients in intermediate stage. Conventional TACE(c TACE) is performed with the injection of an emulsion of a chemotherapeutic drug with lipiodol into the artery feeding the tumoral nodules, followed by embolization of the same vessel to obtain a synergistic effect of drug cytotoxic activity and ischemia. Aim of this review is to summarize the main characteristics of drug-eluting beads(DEB)-TACE and the clinical results reported so far in the literature. A literature search was conducted using Pub Med until June 2017. In order to overcome the drawbacks of c TACE, namely lack of standardization and unpredictability of outcomes, non-absorbable embolic microspheres charged with cytotoxic agents(DEBs) have been developed. DEBs are able to simultaneously exert both the therapeutic components of TACE, either drug-carrier function and embolization, unlike c TACE in which applying the embolic agent is a second moment after drug injection. This way, risk of systemic drug release is minimal due to both high-affinity carrier activity of DEBs and absence of a time interval between injection and embolization. However, despite promising results of preliminary studies, clear evidence of superiority of DEB-TACE over c TACE is still lacking. A number of novel technical devices are actually in development in the field of loco-regional treatments for HCC, but only a few of them have entered the clinical arena. In absence of well-designed randomized-controlled trials, the decision on whether use DEB-TACE or c TACE is still controversial.     

Chemotherapy for transarterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM: To compare the efficacy of different chemotherapeutic agents during conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of patients with unresectable HCC undergoing cTACE from May 2003 to November 2011. A total of 107 patients were treated with at least one cTACE session. Irinotecan (CPT-11) was used as a chemotherapeutic agent in 24 patients, gemcitabine (GEM) in 24 and doxorubicin in 59.RESULTS: The time to progression and overall survival rates were significantly superior in patients treated with CPT-11 compared with the GEM or doxorubicin treated groups (11.4, 8.2, 9.5 mo, P = 0.02 and 21.7, 12.7, 14.5 mo, P = 0.004, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that for intermediate-stage HCC, CPT-11 resulted in a significantly longer time to progression and overall survival compared with the GEM or doxorubicin treated groups (P = 0.022; P = 0.003, respectively). There were no significant differences in adverse events among the three groups (P > 0.05).CONCLUSION: For patients treated with cTACE, the chemotherapeutic agent CPT-11 was significantly associated with improved overall survival and delayed tumor progression compared with GEM or doxorubicin. There were no significant differences in clinical adverse events between the three agents. CPT-11 thus appears to be a promising agent when combined with cTACE for the treatment of HCC.     

Management of hepatocellular carcinoma with transarterial chemoembolization in the era of systemic targeted therapy

The clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often complicated by poor liver function. Treatment options for intermediate- and advanced-stage disease are limited. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an effective first-line therapy for intermediate-stage HCC. By interrupting blood flow to the tumor and administering concentrated chemotherapy locoregionally, TACE induces necrosis at the tumor site, but may create conditions that permit or encourage angiogenesis and recurrence of the tumor. Combination of TACE with new targeted agents may be an effective way to treat intermediate-stage HCC, particularly in higher risk patients. Because of the efficacy and safety of sorafenib-the first systemic therapy to show significant clinical benefit in advanced HCC-there is great interest in its potential use in combination with existing treatment modalities. The synergistic combination of TACE plus sorafenib represents a promising opportunity for tumor control.     

Imaging response predictors following drug eluting beads chemoembolization in the neoadjuvant liver transplant treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization(DEB-TACE) is an endovascular treatment to release chemotherapeutic agents within a target lesion,minimizing systemic exposure and adverse effects to chemotherapeutics.Therefore, identifying which patient characteristics may predict imaging response to DEB-TACE can improve treatment results while selecting the best candidates. Predictors of the response after DEB-TACE still have not been fully elucidated. This is the first prospective study performed with standardized DEBTACE technique that aim to identify predictors of radiological response,assessing patients clinical and laboratory characteristics, diagnostic imaging and intraprocedure data of the hepatocellular carcinoma treated in the neoadjuvant context for liver transplantation.AIM To identify pre-and intraoperative clinical and imaging predictors of the radiological response of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization(DEB-TACE) for the neoadjuvant treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).METHODS This is prospective, cohort study, performed in a single transplant center, from2011 to 2014. Consecutive patients with HCC considered for liver transplant who underwent DEB-TACE in the first session for downstaging or bridging purposes were recruited. Pre and post-chemoembolization imaging studies were performed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance. The radiological response of each individual HCC was evaluated by objective response using m RECIST and the percentage of necrosis.RESULTS Two hundred patients with 380 HCCs were examined. Analysis of the objective response(nodule-based analysis) demonstrated that HCC with pseudocapsules had a 2.01 times greater chance of being responders than those without pseudocapsules(P = 0.01), and the addition of every 1 mg of chemoembolic agent increased the chance of therapeutic response in 4%(P 0.001). Analysis of the percentage of necrosis through multiple linear regression revealed that the addition of each 1 mg of the chemoembolic agent caused an average increase of 0.65%(P 0.001) in necrosis in the treated lesion, whereas the hepatocellular carcinoma with pseudocapsules presented 18.27%(P 0.001) increased necrosis compared to those without pseudocapsules.CONCLUSION The presence of a pseudocapsule and the addition of the amount of chemoembolic agent increases the chance of an objective response in hepatocellular carcinoma and increases the percentage of tumor necrosis following drug-eluting bead chemoembolization in the neoadjuvant treatment,prior to liver transplantation.     

Intra-arterial therapies for unresectable and chemorefractory colorectal cancer liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

A large proportion of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) not amenable to curative liver resection will progress on systemic therapy. Intra-arterial therapies (IAT) including conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE), drug eluting beads (DEB-TACE) and yttrium-90 radioembolization (Y-90) are indicated to prolong survival and palliate symptoms. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the survival benefit and radiologic response of three intra-arterial therapies in patients with chemorefractory and unresectable CRCLM.

Risk factors for the leakage of chemotherapeutic agents into systemic circulation after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma

This prospective study was to investigate the possible risk factors for the leakage of chemotherapeutic agent into the systemic circulation after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Peripheral plasma concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents were determined at 1 hour and 72 hours after TACE by high-performance liquid chromatography in 53 patients. HCC were divided into three types namely single nodule (<5 cm), multiple nodules (all <5 cm), and main nodule measuring 5 cm or more. Forty-four patients (83%) showed detectable chemotherapeutic concentrations within 72 hours after TACE. Patients with single nodular-type HCC had lower incidence of detectable plasma chemotherapeutic agents after TACE than the other two groups (all p < 0.05). The injected doses of lipiodol, epirubicin, and mitomycin C were lower in patients without detection than in patients with detectable chemotherapeutic agents (all p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression showed that tumor type and injected dose of lipiodol were two independent risk factors for the leakage of mitomycin C at 1 hour after TACE (all p < 0.05), and the injected dose of mitomycin C was the risk factor for the leakage of epirubicin at 1 hour after TACE (p < 0.05). In conclusion, multiple nodular type and large nodule measuring 5 cm or more have a risk of leakage of mitomycin C after TACE. Injected dose of lipiodol and mitomycin C as risk factor for the leakage of mitomycin C and epirubicin respectively may be because of competition of their injected volume within the limited space of target.     

The ART-SCORE is not an effective tool for optimizing patient selection for DEB-TACE retreatment. A multicentre Spanish study

Introduction

The appropriate selection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who are eligible for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains a challenge. The ART score has recently been proposed as a method of identifying patients who are eligible or not for a second TACE procedure.

Doxorubicin-loaded Drug-eluting beads Versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization for Nonresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background/Aims:To compare the efficacy and safety profile of doxorubicin-loaded drug-eluting beads (DEB) to the conventional TACE (C-TACE) in the management of nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Results:Thirty-five patients (51 procedures) in the DEB-TACE group and 19 patients (25 procedures) in the c-TACE group were included in the analysis. The median follow up time was 61 days (range 24–538 days) in the DEB-TACE group and 86 days (range 3–152 days) for the c-TACE group patients. Complete response (CR), objective response (OR), disease control (DC), and progressive disease (PD) rates were 11%, 24%, 53%, and 47%, respectively, in the DEB = TACE group compared with 4%, 32%, 64%, and 36%, respectively, in the c-TACE group. Mean ALT change from baseline was minimal in the DEB-TACE patients compared with c-TACE group (7.2 vs 79.4 units, P = 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the DEB-TACE group (7.8 days vs 11.4 days; P = 0.038). The 2-year survival rate was 60% for the c-TACE patients and 58% for the DEB-TACE (P = 0.4).Conclusions:DEB-TACE compared with c-TACE is associated with lesser liver toxicity benefit, better tolerance, and shorter hospital stay. The two modalities however had similar survival and efficacy benefits.     

大肝癌的消融治疗

肝癌是我国最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,当单个肿瘤直径大于5 cm时定义为大肝癌。大肝癌具有肿瘤恶性程度高、易出现肿瘤转移和血管浸润等特点,增加了治疗的难度。外科切除是大肝癌首选的治疗方案,但仅有20%~30%的患者符合手术治疗要求。对于不可切除的大肝癌国内外指南推荐经肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)作为治疗方案,TACE可以控制肿瘤进展并延长患者生存时间,但反复多次的TACE治疗疗效有限,且对患者肝功能造成严重损害,单独的TACE治疗已无法满足临床需求。随着肿瘤消融技术如射频、微波和冷冻消融等不断发展,TACE联合肿瘤消融治疗已成为大肝癌治疗中的一个重要治疗手段。然而目前国内外关于大肝癌消融治疗的疗效仍有较多的争议,因此如何选择合适的消融时机,减少消融术后残留,降低消融术后肿瘤的复发,最终使患者生存获益是目前临床和科研仍需继续探讨的难题。针对以上内容,综述并分析了大肝癌消融治疗的现况、困境及未来发展趋势。     

Transarterial embolization therapies for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: CEPO review and clinical recommendations

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most deadly cancers in the world and its incidence rate has consistently increased over the past 15 years in Canada. Although transarterial embolization therapies are palliative options commonly used for the treatment of HCC, their efficacy is still controversial. The objective of this guideline is to review the efficacy and safety of transarterial embolization therapies for the treatment of HCC and to develop evidence-based recommendations.

Method

A review of the scientific literature published up to October 2013 was performed. A total of 38 studies were included.

Recommendations

Considering the evidence available to date, the CEPO recommends the following: (i) transarterial chemoembolization therapy (TACE) be considered a standard of practice for the palliative treatment of HCC in eligible patients; (ii) drug-eluting beads (DEB)-TACE be considered an alternative and equivalent treatment to conventional TACE in terms of oncological efficacy (overall survival) and incidence of severe toxicities; (iii) the decision to treat with TACE or DEB-TACE be discussed in tumour boards; (iv) bland embolization (TAE) not be considered for the treatment of HCC; (v) radioembolization (TARE) not be considered outside of a clinical trial setting; and (vi) sorafenib combined with TACE not be considered outside of a clinical trial setting.     

The response of Golgi protein 73 to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma may relate to the influence of certain chemotherapeutics

BACKGROUND: Golgi protein 73(GP73) is a promising biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). It decreases after surgical resection, and resumes upon recurrence, indicating a potential indicator for the effectiveness of the treatment. But changes of GP73 after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE) have not been reported so far. This study was to investigate the dynamic changes of GP73 in HCC patients after TACE treatment, and the possible underlying mechanisms in the cell cultures.METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 72 HCC patients, before TACE, at day 1 and day 30 after TACE. GP73 levels were measured by Western blotting. The dynamic changes of GP73 were analyzed and compared with image changes and clinical data. The effects of chemotherapeutic agents(5-FU and pirarubicin) on GP73 expression were tested in three HCC cell lines(Hep G2, HCCLM3 and MHCC97H).RESULTS: The GP73 level was significantly elevated at day 1and day 30 after TACE in HCC patients compared with that before the procedure(P0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two time points after TACE, nor correlationbetween GP73 levels and clinicopathological features, tumor metastasis, and patient survival. Pirarubicin, not 5-FU, significantly increased GP73 expression in three cell lines. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike surgical resection which decreases the GP73 level, TACE significantly increased GP73 expression in patients with HCC. No correlations were observed among GP73 levels, tumor characteristics and prognosis of patients with HCC.     

上皮细胞粘附分子在肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝癌中的表达改变及其功能

目的明确肝动脉化疗栓塞(transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization,TACE)治疗对肝细胞癌(hepatocellular carcinoma,HCC)肿瘤组织中肿瘤干细胞指示分子——上皮细胞粘附分子(epithelial cell adhesion molecule,Ep CAM)表达及肝癌干细胞生物学行为的影响。方法用实时PCR分别检测30例经TACE治疗和30例未经TACE治疗的HCC患者肿瘤组织中Ep CAM的表达水平。在此基础上,用Ep CAM的si RNA载体,在HCC细胞系Hep G2和高侵袭性的MHCC-97H中检测Ep CAM对抗肿瘤药物作用的影响;在MHCC-97H细胞系中,检测降低Ep CAM表达对MHCC-97H侵袭作用的影响。结果接受TACE治疗的HCC患者肿瘤组织中的Ep CAM表达水平升高(P0.05)。与对照组相比,在Hep G2细胞中转染Ep CAM的si RNA能够显著上调Hep G2细胞对分子靶向抗肿瘤药物索拉非尼以及细胞毒性化疗药物奥沙利铂和表柔比星的敏感性。在MHCC-97H中转染Ep CAM的si RNA能够显著抑制其侵袭作用。结论 TACE治疗可引起HCC组织中Ep CAM的表达水平明显升高;降低HCC细胞中Ep CAM表达水平,可导致HCC细胞的肿瘤干细胞特征如侵袭性显著下降,对抗肿瘤药物的敏感性升高。     

Consensus recommendations and review by an International Expert Panel on Interventions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (EPOIHCC)

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents with a high burden of disease in East Asian countries. Intermediate‐stage HCC as defined by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system poses a clinical challenge as it includes a heterogeneous population of patients that can vary widely in terms of tumour burden, liver function and disease aetiology. Intermediate HCC patients often have unsatisfactory clinical outcomes with repeated transarterial chemoembolization (TACE, due to non‐response of the target tumour or the development of further metastasis indicating progressive disease. In September 2011, an Expert Panel Opinion on Interventions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (EPOIHCC) was convened in HK in an attempt to provide a consensus on the practice of TACE. To that end, current clinical practice throughout Asia was reviewed in detail including safety and efficacy data on TACE alone as well as in combination with targeted systemic therapies. This review summarises the evidence discussed at the meeting and provides expert recommendation regarding the available therapeutic options for unresectable intermediate stage HCC. A key consensus of the Expert Panel was that in order to improve patient outcomes and long‐term survival, the possibility of using TACE in combination with targeted agents given systemically should be explored. While the currently available clinical data is promising, the expected completion of several pivotal phase II and III RCTs will provide further evidence in support of the rationale for combination therapy regimens.     

Recent advances in multidisciplinary management of hepatocellular carcinoma

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) is increasing, and it is currently the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Potentially curative treatment options for HCC include resection, transplantation, and percutaneous ablation, whereas palliative treatments include trans-arterial chemoembolization(TACE), radioembolization, and systemic treatments. Due to the diversity of available treatment options and patients’ presentations, a multidisciplinaryteam should decide clinical management of HCC, according to tumor characteristics and stage of liver disease. Potentially curative treatments are suitable for very-early- and early-stage HCC. However, the vast majority of HCC patients are diagnosed in later stages, where the tumor characteristics or progress of liver disease prevent curative interventions. For patients with intermediate-stage HCC, TACE and radioembolization improve survival and are being evaluated in addition to potentially curative therapies or with systemic targeted therapy. There is currently no effective systemic chemotherapy, immunologic, or hormonal therapy for HCC, and sorafenib is the only approved moleculartargeted treatment for advanced HCC. Other targeted agents are under investigation; trials comparing new agents in combination with sorafenib are ongoing. Combinations of systemic targeted therapies with local treatments are being evaluated for further improvements in HCC patient outcomes. This article provides an updated and comprehensive overview of the current standards and trends in the treatment of HCC.     

Efficacy of intra-arterial contrast-enhanced ultrasonography during transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads for hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM To assess the usefulness of intra-arterial contrastenhanced ultrasonography(IAUS) during transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) with drug-eluting beads(DEB) for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).METHODS Thirty two patients with 39 HCC underwent DEB-TACE guided with IAUS, and examined by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(CEUS) or dynamic CT after DEB-TACE were enrolled in this study. CEUS findings before DEBTACE and IAUS findings were compared. Treatments judged to be complete and incomplete for lesions were appropriate and insufficient, respectively. Findings on CEUS and/or dynamic CT performed 1, 3 and 6 mo after DEB-TACE were evaluated using m RECIST(CR/PR/SD/PD).RESULTS The treatments were complete and incomplete in 26 and 13 lesions, respectively. On imaging evaluation using CEUS and/or dynamic CT one month after treatment, 25 and 1 lesions were judged to be CR and PR, respectively, and at 6 mo after treatment, the results were CR, PR, SD and PD for 24, 1, 0 and 1 of these lesions, respectively, in the 26 completely treated lesions. Of the 13 lesions in which treatment was incomplete, the results on imaging at one month after treatment were CR, PR, SD and PD for 0, 6, 4 and 3 lesions, respectively. The overall CR rate at 6 mo after treatment was 61.5%(24/39).CONCLUSION A combination of DEB-TACE with IAUS can improve the therapeutic effects in patients with HCC.