Application of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with acute coronary syndrome requiring emergency surgery.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has become a more applicable procedure, even in patients with multi-vessel disease. However, the role of OPCAB for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring emergency revascularization has not been established yet. We reviewed our results of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for patients with ACS. Seventy-two patients with ACS who underwent emergency CABG were studied. Twenty-five underwent OPCAB and 47 on-pump CABG. OPCAB was mainly indicated for patients who were possibly at risk for cardiopulmonary bypass. When the coronary anatomy was suitable in younger or less risky patients, OPCAB was performed. Patients with multi-vessel disease or with a critical left main trunk lesion were not excluded from OPCAB. The mean number of grafted vessels was 2.6 per patient in the OPCAB group, and 3.8 per patient in the on-pump group (p<0.0001). However, none of the patients in either group required postoperative catheter intervention. Mean operative time was 195 minutes in the OPCAB group and 286 minutes in the on-pump group (p<0.0001). There were three postoperative deaths in the OPCAB group and four in the on-pump group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative cardiogenic shock was the only significant predictor for postoperative death (odds ratio, 7.33). The selection of the on-pump procedure or OPCAB did not correlate with operative death. Thus, we conclude that OPCAB can be performed safely and effectively in selected patients with ACS requiring emergency coronary revascularization.     

Coronary artery surgery results 2005 in Japan.

This report is focused on the status and outcome of coronary artery surgery performed in Japan, from January 1 to December 31, 2005. A total of 12,207 cases underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), as an isolated or concomitant procedure. Isolated CABG was performed in 9,827 patients. The operative mortality for patients who underwent isolated CABG was 1.91% in 2005. The mortality for initial elective CABG was 0.89%. These are the most improved results obtained since annual surveys started over 30 years ago. Since 1996 the number of off-pump CABG (OPCAB) cases increased year after year. This less-invasive procedure was performed on 4,936 patients in 2005, which is 61.0% the of total number of CABG cases. Mortality improved after complete OPCAB to 0.60%, which is the lowest rate since this procedure has been introduced. More than half (50.6%) of 4 and/or more grafting patients underwent OPCAB, which is higher rate than that (49.7%) in 2004. The percentage of elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery is rising every year. In 2005, 46.5% of patients were aged 70 years or older and 7.8% were aged 80 years or older. The utilization rate of arterial grafts was 70%.     

Off-pump coronary revascularization: current state of the art

Patients presenting for surgical coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are older and have more comorbidity than patients in prior decades. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may add to the elevated morbidity and mortality seen in these higher-risk patients. After the re-introduction of single-vessel bypass without CPB, surgeons have developed techniques for multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) through sternotomy. Understanding the causes of the hemodynamic disturbances seen during cardiac displacement has led to surgical techniques that minimize mechanical compression and the effects of temporary regional ischemia. With careful attention to detail, OPCAB has been shown to be feasible in nearly all patients needing coronary artery bypass. The procedure has been demonstrated to be safe and effective. Early outcomes and graft patency rates appear to be at least as good as those seen with traditional CPB-supported CABG. Certain high-risk groups may be better treated with OPCAB, but further studies are necessary to elucidate which patients should be offered OPCAB and which should receive standard CABG.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting/beating coronary artery bypass grafting for a patient with low left ventricular ejection fraction

Beating coronary artery bypass grafting could be performed for a 47-year-old man with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 9.3%. Post-operative LVEF was improved to 51.6%. Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) used to be contraindicative for patients with LVEF below 20%. Recently, such patients are involved to indication of off-pump CABG (OPCAB) or beating CABG, because we consider OPCAB are lower complications than conventional CABG. We were able to bypass the circumflex for the patient while we had been used percutaneous cardio-pulmonary support (PCPS). We could perform beating coronary artery bypass grafting for a patient of the low LVEF.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: initial experience at one community hospital

BACKGROUND: This study reports one cardiac surgical center's experience with off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and compares clinical risk factors and outcomes with a group of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass at the same institution. METHODS: Data on preoperative risk factors, intraoperative clinical markers, and postoperative outcomes were collected prospectively on all patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures at our institution. From January 1, 1999, through October 7, 1999, 332 patients underwent OPCAB procedures at our institution. This group was compared with 445 consecutive patients undergoing CABG at the same institution during the period of January 1, 1998, through November 30, 1998. RESULTS: The two groups were similar with respect to preoperative clinical risk factors. Intraoperative data showed OPCAB patients tended to have fewer grafts performed and had a lower frequency of multiple grafts to obtuse marginal vessels. Outcomes showed no differences in the incidence of perioperative stroke, mediastinitis, reexploration for bleeding, pulmonary complications, new renal failure, postoperative atrial fibrillation, or transfusion of blood products. Patients in the OPCAB group had fewer perioperative myocardial infarctions and lower incidence of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome. A higher percentage of OPCAB patients had surgical lengths of stay of 5 days or less. The OPCAB group tended to have a lower in-hospital mortality rate but this difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with revascularization of all coronary artery segments is a safe and effective procedure that can be performed with equal or improved outcomes and shorter surgical lengths of stay compared with CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Economic evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass: cost-effectiveness and quality-adjusted life years in a randomized controlled trial

The objective of this study is to evaluate the costs and health benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Randomized controlled clinical trial is used as the design. The setting is in a single tertiary cardiothoracic center in Middlesex, UK. Participants were 168 patients (27 females) requiring primary isolated CABG surgery. Patients were randomized to have the procedure performed by a single surgeon either with CPB (n = 84) or by an off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery (n = 84). Health-related quality of life was assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 6 months using the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life (WHOQOL-100) questionnaire. Mean total costs of patient management by either technique were calculated using different available key sources. A utility measure, derived from WHOQOL-100, was used to calculate quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained in each group, on basis of which a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. The mean total costs of an OPCAB patient was 5859 pounds , whereas for a CPB patient it was 7431 pounds with a mean difference of 1572 pounds (standard error [SE] 674 pounds ; P = 0.02). Three patients died in the CPB group and two in the OPCAB group during the 6-month follow-up period. Mean QALYs over 6 months was 0.379 in the OPCAB group and 0.362 in the CPB group, but the difference was not significant (mean difference 0.017; SE 0.016; P = 0.305). OPCAB surgery offered patients in this randomized trial similar health benefits to CPB over a 6-month period, but at a significantly less cost.     

On/off-pump beating coronary artery bypass grafting after thoracoplasty

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [OPCAB] or on-pump beating CABG (conventional CABG) was performed in 3 post-thoracoplasty patients. Considering their poor respiratory function after thoracoplasty, OPCAB is considered more suitable than conventional CABG with cardio-pulmonary bypass in such cases with severe coronary lesions. However, because the sternum inclines or the pleural cavity may be polluted in these patients, special care is necessary for the operation. In such cases, it may be impossible to bypass to the circumflex artery in OPCAB, and is necessary to consider the use of percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS), cardio-pulmonary bypass or hybrid therapy before the operation.     

Surgical revascularization in patients with poor left ventricular function: on- or off-pump?

BACKGROUND: Patients with left ventricular dysfunction and low ejection fraction (EF) are at high-risk of complication and mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The potential success of off-pump CABG in this high-risk population has yet to be determined. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and conventional coronary artery bypass (CCAB) in patients with poor left ventricular function, all from a single institution. METHODS: Data on patient demographics, preoperative risk factors, operative and postoperative outcomes were collected retrospectively on all patients having undergone isolated CABG between January 1, 1998, and October 31, 2001. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients (31 OPCAB/46 CCAB) were identified as having an ejection fraction (EF) of < or = 0.35. Of these, 52 had EF < or = 0.30 (21 OPCAB/31 CCAB) and 31 patients had EF < or = 0.25 (10 OPCAB/21 CCAB). Operative mortality was 3.2% after the OPCAB procedure versus 10.9% for the CCAB (p = 0.39). Use of intraaortic balloon pump (6.5%) was rarely required. The OPCAB procedure resulted in significantly less requirement for blood transfusions (p < 0.05), fewer distal anastomoses per patient (p < 0.01), and a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation (p < 0.05) compared with CCAB. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with poor left ventricular function may undergo surgical revascularization using off-pump technique with relatively good results and low mortality levels. The lower number of grafts performed on the off-pump procedure did not seem to affect clinical outcomes.     

Comparison of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in midterm results.

OBJECTIVE: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has become a procedure of choice for surgical treatment of coronary artery disease. Although early advantages of OPCAB were confirmed in comparison with conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), late cardiac complications are still controversial. We examined midterm results of OPCAB compared with standard CABG. METHODS: Between July 1997 and April 2002, 736 consecutive patients who underwent isolated CABG were retrospectively reviewed. The OPCAB group (Group I) comprised 357 patients (49%), and the on-pump CABG group (Group II) 379 patients (51%). Their preoperative, intraoperative, and follow-up data were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean number of distal anastomoses and the early graft patency were not greatly different between the two groups. The actuarial survival rate at 3 years was not significantly different between Group I (98.3%) and Group II (98.2%) (p = 0.71). The frequency of cardiac events was 4.2%/patient-year in Group I and 2.6%/patient-year in Group II (p = 0.12). The actuarial event free rates were not different between the two groups (p = 0.61). The cardiac event free rates at 3 years were significantly (p = 0.011) higher in patients with complete revascularization (96.7%) than without complete revascularization in Group I (69.2%) and in Group II (92.7% versus 85.9%, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Midterm clinical outcome in OPCAB is as good as conventional on-pump CABG. Incomplete revascularization caused cardiac events more frequently than complete revascularization both in OPCAB and on-pump CABG in the intermediate follow-up.     

Clinical outcomes, angiographic patency, and resource utilization in 200 consecutive off-pump coronary bypass patients

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study compared clinical outcomes and resource utilization in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Angiographic patency was documented in the OPCAB group. METHODS: From April 1997 through November 1999, OPCAB was performed in 200 consecutive patients, and the results were compared with those in a contemporaneous matched control group of 1,000 patients undergoing CABG. Patients were matched according to age, sex, preexisting disease (renal failure, diabetes, pulmonary disease, stroke, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, previous myocardial infarction, and primary or redo status. Follow-up in the OPCAB patients was 93% and averaged 13.4 months. RESULTS: Hospital death (1.0%), postoperative stroke (1.5%), myocardial infarction (1.0%), and re-entry for bleeding (1.5%) occurred infrequently in the OPCAB group. There were reductions in the rates of transfusion (33.0% versus 70.0%; p < 0.001) and deep sternal wound infection (0% versus 2.2%; p = 0.067) in the OPCAB group compared with the CABG group. Angiographic assessment of 421 grafted arteries was performed in 167 OPCAB patients (83.5%) prior to hospital discharge. All but five were patent (98.8%) (93.3% FitzGibbon A, 5.5% FitzGibbon B, 1.2% FitzGibbon O). All 163 internal mammary artery grafts were patent. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduced postoperative hospital stay from 5.7 +/- 5.3 days in the CABG group to 3.9 +/- 2.6 days (p < 0.001), with a decrease in hospital cost of 15.0% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduces hospital cost, postoperative length of stay, and morbidity compared with CABG on cardiopulmonary bypass. Off-pump coronary bypass grafting is safe, cost effective, and associated with excellent graft patency and clinical outcomes.     

Coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass versus off-pump cardiopulmonary bypass grafting: does eliminating the pump reduce morbidity and cost?

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may contribute to the complications and cost of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Off-pump CABG (OPCAB) allows coronary revascularization without CPB. We hypothesized that OPCAB provides satisfactory graft patency while reducing complications and cost compared with CABG with CPB. METHODS: We prospectively followed 80 patients undergoing CABG: 40 patients undergoing OPCAB and 40 patients undergoing CABG with CPB. OPCAB patients underwent angiography within 48 hours of surgery to determine early graft patency. Incidence of complications, length of stay, and costs were recorded for each patient. The influence of the number of vessels bypassed was analyzed. RESULTS: OPCAB patients (n = 40) underwent grafting of 2.7 +/- 0.7 vessels per patient compared with 3.6 +/- 0.8 vessels per patient in the CABG with CPB group (n = 40) (p < 0.0001). Angiography demonstrated 105 of 108 (97%) of grafts were patent in the OPCAB group. Incidence of complications, length of stay, and costs did not differ between the OPCAB and CABG with CPB groups. Number of vessels grafted showed a positive correlation to total costs in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: While OPCAB provided satisfactory early graft patency, there was no significant difference between OPCAB and CABG with CPB with regard to cost, length of stay, or incidence of complications. In this study, eliminating CPB did not reduce morbidity or cost after CABG.     

High thoracic epidural anesthesia for coronary artery bypass grafting using two different surgical approaches in conscious patients

Recent developments in coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) without cardiopulmonary bypass made the sole use of high thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) in conscious patients feasible. Previously, TEA has been reported only for single-vessel CABG via lateral thoracotomy. We investigated the feasibility and complications of sole TEA in 20 patients undergoing beating-heart arterial revascularization via partial lower sternotomy for single-vessel disease (minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting [MIDCAB] technique; n = 10) or complete median sternotomy for multivessel disease (off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting [OPCAB] technique; n = 10). An epidural catheter was inserted at the T1-2 or T2-3 interspace. An epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.5% and sufentanil 1.66 micro g/mL was started to establish anesthetic levels at C5-6 for OPCAB and at T1-2 for MIDCAB. Nine OPCAB and eight MIDCAB procedures were completed while patients were awake and spontaneously breathing during the entire procedure. Because of surgical pneumothorax (OPCAB), insufficient anesthesia, or phrenic nerve palsy (both MIDCAB), three patients required intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia. The heart rate decreased significantly (P < 0.05) by 10%-15% in both groups during the procedure. Compared with baseline (B), mean arterial blood pressure (mm Hg) was decreased significantly only during coronary anastomosis (CA) (B(OPCAB), 95 +/- 11; CA(OPCAB), 68 +/- 9; B(MIDCAB), 86 +/- 10; CA(MIDCAB), 73 +/- 10; P not significant between groups). PaCO(2) increased from 42 +/- 2 mm Hg to 46 +/- 7 mm Hg (P < 0.05) throughout the perioperative course during OPCAB, whereas it remained almost unaltered during MIDCAB procedures. All patients rated TEA as "good" or "excellent." In conclusion, we demonstrated that the sole use of TEA for MIDCAB and OPCAB procedures was feasible and provided a high degree of patient satisfaction in our small and highly selected cohorts. IMPLICATIONS. The sole use of high thoracic epidural anesthesia was studied in 20 patients who underwent beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting using either median or partial lower sternotomy while awake.     

Beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting for acute myocardial infarction

We consider that off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [OPCAB], which results in local myocardial ischemia, is more effective for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than conventional CABG under cardiac arrest with global myocardial ischemia. Twenty-one patients (15 males, 6 females) received OPCAB for AMI, among whom surgery was performed following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) failure in 4 and PCI was performed prior to OPCAB in 2, while PCI was not performed in the remaining 15. Preoperatively, 16 patients had intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP), and 4 had IABP and percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS). The mean interval from onset to surgery was 11.7 (range 3 to 40) hours. In 20 cases, a complete revascularization was performed. The mean number of bypasses was 2.3 and OPCAB was carried out in 14 patients. In 2 cases, OPCAB was converted to on-pump beating CABG for complete revascularization. Fourteen patients (67%), each maintained with preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), were discharged with an elective bypass. Four patients died after on-pump beating CABG, in whom EF was lower than 10%. In addition, 3 died of low cardiac output syndrome (LOS) under PCPS and 1 of ventricular fibrillation. Based on our results, we considered that complete revascularization using OPCAB was effective for cases of AMI with PCI difficulty. However, in shock cases requiring PCPS, cardiac function was not improved even after revascularization. Therefore, it is necessary to study new procedures for shock cases during the period from onset to surgery.     

Coronary artery bypass in patients 80 years and over: is off-pump the operation of choice?

BACKGROUND: Octogenarians are at increased risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality after coronary artery bypass. In this study we compared our experience with patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass (CAB) and those undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) to assess outcomes. METHODS: We used hospital database analysis in patients 80 years and older who underwent nonemergent coronary artery bypass with (N = 169) and without (N = 60) cardiopulmonary bypass from January 1999 through June 2001. RESULTS: Both groups were at increased perioperative risk based on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk model (7.7% OPCAB vs 5.8% CAB, p = 0.03). There were no operative deaths in the OPCAB group but there were eight (4.7%) in the CAB group (p = NS). Perioperative stroke (0% OPCAB vs 7.1% CAB, p = 0.04), prolonged ventilation (1.7% OPCAB vs 11.8% CAB, p = 0.02), and transfusion rate (33% OPCAB vs 70.4% CAB, p < 0.001) were all lower in the OPCAB group. A shorter hospital stay (6.3 days OPCAB vs 11.5 days CAB, p < 0.001) resulted in lower hospital cost in the OPCAB group ($9,363 OPCAB vs $12,312 CAB, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients was associated with fewer complications, a shorter hospital stay, and lower hospital cost. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting may be the operation of choice for octogenarians requiring surgical myocardial revascularization.     

Use of an audible ultrasonic flowmeter to locate deeply buried coronary arteries for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

In patients with coronary arteries that are deeply buried in the myocardium and fat, it is difficult and sometimes risky to expose them for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB), leading to unavoidable conversion to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (C-CABG) to ensure their safety. We have developed a new search procedure for these coronary arteries using a dedicated ultrasonic flowmeter with a small tip probe for OPCAB. This technique enables the identification of intramuscular and intra-fat coronary arteries that are less diseased and thus more suited for bypass surgery instead of switching to C-CABG. We believe this procedure will not only improve the quality of OPCAB but also expand its indication.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass: techniques, pitfalls, and results

In coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), coronary artery anastomosis is generally performed under cardiac arrest using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). To avoid the invasiveness of CPB, off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) is currently also used. In Japan, in particular, OPCAB now accounts for 60 % of all CABG operations and has become a standard surgical procedure. We herein provide a discussion of OPCAB. The goals of coronary artery bypass surgery are to achieve complete revascularization and maintain a high rate of graft patency for the long term. This requires stable exposure of the coronary arteries, including those located on the posterior surface of the heart and the formation of good-quality anastomoses. Achieving this depends not only on the competency of the individual surgeon, but also on smooth and effective teamwork among everyone involved, including the other surgeons, anesthetists, clinical technicians, and nurses. It is important for surgeons and surgical teams to examine their own outcomes and engage in self-scrutiny in an endeavor to improve these outcomes.     

Coronary artery surgery results 2002 in Japan.

Over the past 30 years, we have reported on status and outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery in Japan. This report is focused on surgery performed last year, from January 1 to December 31, 2002. A total of 13,474 cases underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) of these, 12,552 underwent CABG only. The operative mortality for patients who underwent CABG only was 2.04% in 2002. Mortality for initial elective CABG was 1.02%. These are the best results obtained since surveys were started. The percentage of elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery is rising annually. In 2002, 44.4% of patients were aged 70 years or older and 6.9% were aged 80 years or older. Mortality in elderly patients undergoing initial elective surgery is decreasing, with a mortality of 1.3% for patients aged 70 years or older and 2.0% for patients aged 80 years or older. Since 1996, the number of off-pump CABG (OPCAB) cases remarkably increased annually. This less-invasive procedure was performed on 5,628 patients in 2002, which is 41.8% of the total number of CABG cases.     

Benefits of off-pump bypass on neurologic and clinical morbidity: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Neurologic and clinical morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) can be significant. By avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass, off-pump CABG (OPCAB) may reduce morbidity. METHODS: Sixty patients (30 CABG and 30 OPCAB) were prospectively randomized. Neurocognitive testing was performed before the operation and 2 weeks and 1 year after the operation. Neurologic testing to detect stroke and (99m)Tc-HMPAO whole-brain single photon emission computed tomography scanning to assess cerebral perfusion were performed before the operation and 3 days afterward. Bilateral middle cerebral artery transcranial Doppler scanning was performed intraoperatively to detect cerebral microemboli. All examiners were blinded to treatment group. Clinical morbidity and costs were compared. RESULTS: Coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with more cerebral microemboli (575 +/- 278.5 CABG versus 16.0 +/- 19.5 OPCAB (median +/- semiinterquartile range) and significantly reduced cerebral perfusion after the operation to the bilateral occipital, cerebellar, precunei, thalami, and left temporal lobes (p < or = 0.01). Cerebral perfusion with OPCAB was unchanged. Compared with base line, OPCAB patients performed better on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (total and recognition scores) at both 2 weeks and at 1 year (p < or = 0.05), whereas CABG performance was statistically unchanged for all cognitive measures. Patients who underwent CABG had more chest tube drainage (1389 +/- 1256 mL CABG versus 789 +/- 586 mL OPCAB, p = 0.02) and required more blood (3.9 +/- 5.8 U CABG versus 1.2 +/- 2.2 U OPCAB, p = 0.02), fresh frozen plasma (3.0 +/- 6.0 U CABG versus 0.5 +/- 2.2 U OPCAB, p = 0.03), and hours of postoperative use of dopamine (16.3 +/- 21.2 hours CABG versus 7.3 +/- 9.7 hours OPCAB, p = 0.04). These differences culminated in higher costs for CABG ($23,053 +/- $5,320 CABG versus $17,780 +/- $4,390 OPCAB, p < 0.0001). One stroke occurred with CABG, compared with none with OPCAB (p = NS). One OPCAB patient died because of a pulmonary embolus (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CABG, OPCAB may reduce neurologic and clinical morbidity as well as cost.     

Comparison of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in midterm results

Objective: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has become a procedure of choice for surgical treatment of coronary artery disease. Although early advantages of OPCAB were confirmed in comparison with conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), late cardiac complications are still controversial. We examined midterm results of OPCAB compared with standard CABG. Methods: Between July 1997 and April 2002, 736 consecutive patients who underwent isolated CABG were retrospectively reviewed. The OPCAB group (Group I) comprised 357 patients (49%), and the on-pump CABG group (Group II) 379 patients (51%). Their preoperative, intraoperative, and follow-up data were analyzed. Results: The mean number of distal anastomoses and the early graft patency were not greatly different between the two groups. The actuarial survival rate at 3 years was not significantly different between Group I (98.3%) and Group II (98.2%) (p=0.71). The frequency of cardiac events was 4.2%/patient-year in Group I and 2.6%/patient-year in Group II (p=0.12). The actuarial event free rates were not different between the two groups (p=0.61). The cardiac event free rates at 3 years were significantly (p=0.011) higher in patients with complete revascularization (96.7%) than without complete revascularization in Group I (69.2%) and in Group II (92.7% versus 85.9%, p=0.026). Conclusions: Midterm clinical outcome in OPCAB is as good as conventional on-pump CABG. Incomplete revascularization caused cardiac events more frequently than complete revascularization both in OPCAB and on-pump CABG in the intermediate follow-up.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A single center experience

Background Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is gaining popularity as an effective alternative to conventional CABG using cardiopulmonary bypass. With the advent of mechanical tissue stabilization systems and intra coronary shunts the technique of off-pump CABG (OPCAB) is now applicable to revascularize the patients with multi-vessel disease. Methods A total of 293 patients underwent surgical myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass between July 1996 and October 2000 at our hospital. Of these, 245 patients received 2 or more grafts: two in 193 patients, 3 in 46 patients and 4 in 7 patients. A mechnical tissue stabilization system (CTS or Octopus II/III) was used in all patients. In majority of the patients intra coronary shunts were also used. A total of 550 distal anastomoses were made and the vessels grafted were LAD (n=245), diagonal (n=90), ramus intermedius (n=16), obtuse marginal branches (n=58), distal right coronary artery (n=88) and posterior descending artery (n=52). Results There was no incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction. Three patients had transient ST segment elevation postoperatively which was normalized in the first few hours. Hospital mortality was 0.4%. No patient needed reexploration for bleeding. No patient had neurological event or pulmonary problems. All these patients except one were discharged from the hospital between 6 and 9 days. Conclusion In selected patients multi vessel OPCAB is a safe and reproducible technique and the mechanical tissue stabilization systems have made the procedure less difficult to perform. Its usefulness is more pronounced in high risk patients with comorbidities and the patients who undergo this procedure are free from major complications.