Randomized Phase II Trial of weekly paclitaxel alone versus trastuzumab plus weekly paclitaxel as first-line therapy of patients with Her-2 positive advanced breast cancer

Background A randomized Phase II study evaluated the activity of weekly paclitaxel versus its combination with trastuzumab for treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer overexpressing HER-2. Patients and methods Among 124 patients randomized, 123 are assessable for toxicity and 118 for response. Patients received weekly paclitaxel single agent (80 mg/m²) or combined with trastuzumab (4 mg/kg loading dose, then weekly 2 mg/kg). HER-2 overexpression was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Patients with 2+/3+ IHC scores were eligible. IHC was compared with HER-2 serum extracellular domain (ECD). Results Patient characteristics were similar in the two arms. Both treatments were feasible and well tolerated with no grade 4 hematologic toxicity. No patient developed cardiac toxicity. The combined treatment was statistically significant superior for overall response rate (ORR) (75% vs. 56.9%; P = 0.037), particularly in the subset of IHC 3+ patients (84.5% vs. 47.5%; P = 0.00050). A statistically significant better median time to progression was seen in the subgroup with IHC 3+ (369 vs. 272 days; P = 0.030) and visceral disease (301 vs. 183 days; P = 0.0080) treated with combination. Multivariable analysis of predictive factors showed that only IHC score retained statistically significant value for ORR (P = 0.0035). Conclusion Weekly paclitaxel plus trastuzumab is highly active and safe and it is superior to paclitaxel alone in patients with IHC score of 3+.     

曲妥珠单抗联合紫杉醇脂质体和卡培他滨治疗HER-2阳性复发转移性乳腺癌

目的：评估曲妥珠单抗（trastuzumab,H）与紫杉醇脂质体（paclitaxel liposome,P）、卡培他滨（capecit-abine,X）的联合方案HPX方案治疗人表皮生长因子受体-2（human epidermal growth factor receptor-2,HER-2）阳性复发转移性乳腺癌的疗效与安全性。方法筛选HER-2阳性复发转移性乳腺癌患者32例,给予HPX方案治疗：曲妥珠单抗首次8 mg／kg,后6 mg／kg维持,d1;紫杉醇脂质体175 mg／m2,d1;卡培他滨825 mg／m2,2次／d,d1－14,21天为1周期。结果32例患者中位无进展生存时间（progression-free survival,PFS）为12．7月（95％CI：5．7－19.7月）,客观缓解率（objective response rate,ORR）为53．2％,临床获益率（clinical benefit rate,CBR）为84．5％。一线治疗患者的PFS达15．3月（95％ CI：2．5－28．1月）,ORR达68．4％,CBR达84．2％。Ⅲ～Ⅳ级不良反应主要为血液学毒性,包括中性粒细胞减少（46．9％）、白细胞减少（37．5％）、血小板减少（6．3％）,Ⅲ～Ⅳ级非血液学不良反应主要为手足综合征（9．4％）和腹泻（3．1％）。结论曲妥珠单抗联合紫杉醇脂质体和卡培他滨是治疗HER-2阳性复发转移性乳腺癌的有效治疗方案,且安全性良好。     

Phase II study of weekly docetaxel and trastuzumab for patients with HER-2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of weekly docetaxel plus trastuzumab in women with HER-2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Efficacy was correlated with serum HER-2 extracellular domain (ECD) levels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty women with metastatic breast cancer were treated with weekly docetaxel and trastuzumab as first- or second-line therapy. Both docetaxel 35 mg/m(2)/wk and trastuzumab 2 mg/kg/wk were delivered in 4-week cycles consisting of three weekly treatments followed by 1 week of rest. A loading dose of trastuzumab 4 mg/kg was administered 1 day before the start of the first cycle. RESULTS: The median delivered dose-intensity of docetaxel was 24 mg/m(2)/wk (range, 18 to 27 mg/m(2)/wk). The intent-to-treat overall response rate (ORR) was 63% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44% to 80%). The ORR in patients whose tumors were HER-2-positive by fluorescence in situ hybridization was 67% (16 of 24 patients; 95% CI, 45% to 84%). In patients with elevated serum HER-2 ECD at baseline, the ORR was 76% (95% CI, 53% to 92%), compared with 33% (95% CI, 7% to 70%) in patients with low HER-2 ECD levels (P =.04). Variations in HER-2 ECD concentrations during treatment correlated with response to treatment. Median time to progression was 9 months. Acute toxicity, including myelosuppression, was mild. Fatigue, fluid retention, and excessive tearing became more common with repetitive dosing. CONCLUSION: Weekly docetaxel and trastuzumab is an active combination for treating patients with HER-2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Serum HER-2 ECD testing may be a promising method for monitoring patients on trastuzumab-based therapy.     

Phase II trial of trastuzumab followed by weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the response rate of trastuzumab as first-line therapy in patients with HER-2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. To assess the feasibility and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin with or without trastuzumab following initial treatment with trastuzumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients received trastuzumab (8 mg/kg followed by 4 mg/kg/wk) for 8 weeks. Responding patients received 8 additional weeks of trastuzumab (4 mg/kg/wk), and then proceeded to receive trastuzumab (2 mg/kg) in combination with paclitaxel 70 mg/m(2) and carboplatin (area under the curve, 2) weekly for 6 weeks followed by 2 weeks rest. Stable patients after the initial 8 weeks of trastuzumab proceeded to treatment with trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin. Patients with disease progression during the initial 8 weeks had the trastuzumab discontinued and were treated with weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin. RESULTS: Weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin with or without trastuzumab was well tolerated. Fifty-two patients were assessable for response and all 61 patients were assessable for survival. Seventeen (33%) of 52 patients experienced a minor/partial response to single-agent trastuzumab and received 8 additional weeks of single-agent trastuzumab. Fifteen (29%) of 52 patients had stable disease and proceeded to receive paclitaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab. Thirty-one patients with measurable disease were assessable for response after initial single-agent trastuzumab followed by paclitaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab. An overall response rate of 84% (eight complete responses/18 partial responses), median time to progression of 14.2 months, and median overall survival of 32.2 months was reported with the triplet combination. In the patients treated with paclitaxel/carboplatin alone after disease progression on initial single-agent trastuzumab, an overall response rate of 69% (one complete response/10 partial responses), median time to progression of 8.3 months, and median overall survival of 22.2 months was reported. Median time to progression for all 61 patients is 10 months and the median overall survival is 26.7 months. CONCLUSION: This trial confirms the activity and tolerability of weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin alone or in combination with trastuzumab in women with HER-2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancer.     

Docetaxel combined with trastuzumab is an active regimen in HER-2 3+ overexpressing and fluorescent in situ hybridization-positive metastatic breast cancer: a multi-institutional phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of weekly docetaxel and trastuzumab as first- or second-line therapy in women with HER-2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer and to correlate the efficacy of trastuzumab with HER-2 status as determined by immunohistochemistry assay and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six women with HER-2-positive (HercepTest [Dako Corp, Carpenteria, CA]2 to 3+) metastatic breast cancer were enrolled onto this study of trastuzumab (4 mg/kg load; 2 mg/kg/wk administered intravenously) and docetaxel (35 mg/m2/wk for 6 weeks). RESULTS: Using an intent-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate was 50% (13 of 26 patients). Eight patients (31%) had a period of stable disease posttherapy. Among HER-2 3+ patients, the overall response rate was 63% (12 of 19 patients) compared with a 14% response rate (one of seven patients) for HER-2 2+ patients (P=.07). Patients with FISH-positive tumors experienced an overall response rate of 64%. Median time to progression was 12.4 months for the entire cohort (HER-2 3+ tumors, 12.3 months; HER-2 2+ lesions, 9.5 months) and median survival was 22.1 months. All HER-2 3+ patients were FISH-positive; the only HER-2 2+ patient responding to treatment was also FISH-positive. Grade 4 toxicities occurred in four patients; most toxicities were mild. CONCLUSION: Trastuzumab plus docetaxel is an active and well-tolerated regimen in women with HER-2 3+ overexpressing or FISH-positive metastatic breast cancer.     

Docetaxel plus Cisplatin

? Docetaxel and cisplatin are well established antineoplastic agents with activity against NSCLC. The combination exhibited additive cytotoxic activity against human NSCLC cell lines in vitro. ? In a large phase III trial in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC, survival with docetaxel plus cisplatin was statistically noninferior to that with the control regimen of vinorelbine plus cisplatin. Overall response rate with docetaxelplus cisplatin was significantly higher than with the control. ? Median survival times, tumor response rates, and median time to progression for patients receiving docetaxel plus cisplatin were similar to those for patients receiving paclitaxel plus cisplatin in another large phase III trial. ? Neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 adverse event in docetaxel/cisplatin recipients (≥69% of patients in the two large phase III trials); these proportions were not significantly different from those for patients receiving controls. Grade 3/4 vomiting, nausea, or anemia were significantly less common than with vinorelbine plus cisplatin, whereas hypersensitivity reactions were significantly more common than with paclitaxel plus cisplatin.

紫杉醇脂质体联合顺铂方案一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床随机对照研究

背景与目的紫杉醇联合顺铂方案(pacilitaxel plus cisplatin,TP)是目前一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)的标准方案之一。本研究旨在比较紫杉醇脂质体联合顺铂(liposome pacilitaxelplus cisplatin,LP)方案与TP方案一线治疗晚期NSCLC的近期疗效、远期生存及毒副反应。方法 100例患者随机分为两组,分别静脉注射紫杉醇脂质体和紫杉醇注射液150 mg/m~2,第1天,联合顺铂75mg/m~2,第1天-2天,21天一个周期。结果 100例患者均可评价疗效,其中LP组中位无进展生存期(progression free survival,PFS)为5.1个月,中位总生存期(overall survival,OS)为9.0个月,客观反应率(response rate,RR)为26%;TP组中位PFS为4.2个月,中位OS为9.3个月,RR为24%;两组比较均无统计学差异(P=0.110;P=0.342;P=0.890)。两组Ⅲ度+Ⅳ度毒性反应均无统计学差异(P>0.05),LP组末梢神经炎发生率低于TP组(8%vs 28%,P=0.030)。结论 LP方案一线治疗晚期NSCLC疗效与TP方案相当,末梢神经炎发生率低于TP方案。     

Randomized phase II trial of two different schedules of docetaxel plus cisplatin as first-line therapy in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in the use of a weekly administration of docetaxel as a way of reducing its hematologic toxicity. The purpose of the current randomized study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of docetaxel plus cisplatin combination on 2 schedules in patients with previously untreated, advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Consenting patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on Day 1, plus 3-weekly (75 mg/m(2) on Day 1) or weekly (35 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle) docetaxel, for up to 6 cycles. RESULTS: Of 86 patients accrued, 41 patients were treated with 3-weekly and 43 with weekly docetaxel plus cisplatin. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicity in the 3-weekly arm was neutropenia (56% of patients). In those receiving the weekly regimen, the frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were fatigue (44%) and nausea/vomiting (35%). The overall response rate was 40% with the 3-weekly and 39% with the weekly arm (P = .74). The median progression-free survival was 4.3 months in the 3-weekly arm and 3.9 months in the weekly arm (P = .08) and the median survival was 10.3 and 10.0 months, respectively (P = .76). Quality of life data showed no relevant difference between the arms. CONCLUSIONS: The weekly schedule of docetaxel plus cisplatin combination as first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC, while feasible, has no clear advantage over the standard 3-weekly regimen.     

曲妥珠单抗联合内分泌维持治疗HR和HER-2阳性晚期乳腺癌的临床观察

目的 探讨曲妥珠单抗联合内分泌维持治疗激素受体（HR）和人表皮生长因子受体-2（HER-2）阳性复发转移性乳腺癌的疗效与安全性。方法 回顾性分析本院2013年1月至2016年1月收治的HR和HER-2阳性复发转移性乳腺癌患者31例,一线曲妥珠单抗联合化疗达到病情缓解或稳定后继续曲妥珠单抗联合内分泌维持治疗,采用RECIST 1.1版标准评估维持治疗的疗效,采用常见不良反应事件评价标准（CTCAE）4.0版评价毒性反应,根据随访资料分析预后。结果 31例复发转移性乳腺癌维持治疗的中位无进展生存期为12.0个月（95％CI：5.4～18.6个月）。5例患者在一线化疗后获完全缓解,无可评估病灶,其余26例可评估近期疗效,总有效率和临床获益率分别为26.9％和88.5％。内分泌联合曲妥珠单抗的主要不良反应较轻,主要包括乏力（19.4％）、潮热（16.1％）和恶心呕吐（9.7％）。结论 一线曲妥珠单抗联合化疗有效后,曲妥珠单抗联合内分泌维持治疗HR+／HER-2+转移性乳腺癌可进一步改善患者的临床获益,且安全性良好。     

Trastuzumab plus docetaxel in HER2/neu-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a California Cancer Consortium screening and phase II trial

HER2 is reported to be overexpressed in 20% of cases of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), principally adenocarcinoma. Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody against HER2 that, when combined with a taxane, improves survival compared with chemotherapy alone in advanced breast cancer. In view of these observations, we conducted a phase II HER2 screening and efficacy trial of trastuzumab plus weekly docetaxel in cases of advanced NSCLC in which primary platinum-based therapy had failed. Patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC were screened for HER2 overexpression by immunohistochemistry. Patients with HER2-positive tumors (2+ or 3+) were initially randomized to either single-agent trastuzumab or docetaxel. After completing 2 treatment cycles, all patients went on to receive the trastuzumab/docetaxel combination regardless of response to the single agents. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 30 mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks followed by a 2-week break and trastuzumab 4 mg/kg intravenously on week 1 followed by 2 mg/kg per week thereafter. Cycle length was 8 weeks. Sixty-nine patients with NSCLC (33 men, 36 women) were screened between August 1999 and March 2001. Only 13 patients (19%) had HER2-positive disease; all 13 enrolled in the efficacy trial. Of 9 patients receiving docetaxel alone, 1 partial response (PR) was seen. None responded to trastuzumab alone. The overall outcomes to the sequence of single-agent therapy followed by combination therapy included a PR rate in 8% of cases, stable disease in 23%, progression in 46%, and nonassessable disease in 23%. Estimated event-free and overall survival times were 4.3 and 5.7 months, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated. The screening component of this trial demonstrated that the target population for trastuzumab therapy in NSCLC is relatively small. Because of the limited clinical activity of trastuzumab-based therapy in this cohort and the similar disappointing reports from other studies of trastuzumab in NSCLC, this trial was closed to further accrual. In view of the limited target population for HER2 inhibition, future efforts and resources should be directed toward molecular targets other than HER2 in NSCLC.     

曲妥珠单抗治疗141例人表皮生长因子受体2阳性乳腺癌的回顾性分析

目的 总结曲妥珠单抗在人表皮生长因子受体2(Her-2)阳性乳腺癌患者新辅助、辅助和复发转移治疗中的临床应用经验,评价其与化疗联用的疗效.方法 对2004年1月至2008年12月门诊应用曲妥珠单抗治疗的141乳腺癌患者进行回顾性分析.随访时间为3～319个月.分析患者的无病生存时间(DFS),比较患者辅助、复发转移一线及二线使用曲妥珠单抗治疗的总生存时间(OS)、治疗失败时间(TTF)和临床有效率的差异.结果 与曲妥珠单抗治疗联用的新辅助化疗中,紫杉醇联合卡铂方案占66.7%;辅助治疗中,蒽环类和蒽环类序贯紫杉类方案占53.9%.复发转移的患者治疗后中位DFS为17个月.复发转移的患者经一线曲妥珠单抗联合化疗治疗后,临床总有效 率为84.5%,中位TTF为24个月;二线治疗有效率为44.4%,中位TTF为5个月.两者比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.002).结论 紫杉醇和卡铂化疗联合曲妥珠单抗,值得在新辅助治疗中推广,紫杉类和蒽环类联合或序贯靶向治疗仍是辅助治疗的标准方案.转移性乳腺癌一线应用曲妥珠单抗联合化疗比二线治疗的临床有效率更高,在继续应用曲妥珠单抗的基础上改用化疗方案,可提高治疗有效率,减少治疗失败的概率.     

Second-line,low-dose,weekly paclitaxel in patients with stage IIIB/IV nonsmall cell lung carcinoma who fail first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel

BACKGROUND: Second-line chemotherapy with docetaxel improves survival and quality of life (QoL) in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) who fail first-line platinum-based regimens. The authors sought to determine the activity of second-line, low-dose, weekly paclitaxel in patients with NSCLC who failed first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel. METHODS: Patients with Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who had received first-line carboplatin/paclitaxel were treated with low-dose (80 mg/m(2)), weekly paclitaxel at the time of disease progression. Response rates, QoL, and survival were outcome end points. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 62 years (range, 32-76 years), 55% of patients were male, 89% of patients had Stage IV NSCLC, and the Karnofsky performance status was 90-100% in 31% of patients, 70-80% in 55% of patients, and 60% in 14% of patients. Twenty-six percent of patients experienced disease progression as their best response to first-line carboplatin plus paclitaxel, whereas 52% of patients had stable disease, and 23% of patients had achieved a response. The median time from first-line carboplatin plus paclitaxel to second-line, low-dose, weekly paclitaxel was 9.5 weeks (range, 1-78 weeks). The toxicity profile was extremely favorable, with no Grade 4 toxicity and < 10% Grade 3 hematologic or nonhematologic toxicity in all patients with the exception of neuropathy. Ten percent of patients experienced both Grade 2 and Grade 3 neuropathy. The overall objective response rate was 8%. The median survival was 5.2 months (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 3.6-6.2 months), and the 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 20% (95%CI, 10-30%) and 9% (95%CI, 1-16%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Second-line, low-dose, weekly paclitaxel had activity in selected patients with Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who failed first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel. The toxicity profile of this approach is extremely favorable, and outcome expectations are similar to the outcome expectations with other single agents in this setting.     

Randomized, multinational, phase III study of docetaxel plus platinum combinations versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the TAX 326 study group.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether docetaxel plus platinum regimens improve survival and affect quality of life (QoL) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with vinorelbine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 1,218) with stage IIIB to IV NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (DC); docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the curve of 6 mg/mL * min every 3 weeks (DCb); or vinorelbine 25 mg/m2/wk and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 every 4 weeks (VC). RESULTS: Patients treated with DC had a median survival of 11.3 v 10.1 months for VC-treated patients (P =.044; hazard ratio, 1.183 [97.2% confidence interval, 0.989 to 1.416]). The 2-year survival rate was 21% for DC-treated patients and 14% for VC-treated patients. Overall response rate was 31.6% for DC-treated patients v 24.5% for VC-treated patients (P =.029). Median survival (9.4 v 9.9 months [for VC]; P =.657; hazard ratio, 1.048 [97.2 confidence interval, 0.877 to 1.253]) and response (23.9%) with DCb were similar to those results for VC. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, infection, and febrile neutropenia were similar with all three regimens. Grade 3 to 4 anemia, nausea, and vomiting were more common (P <.01) with VC than with DC or DCb. Patients treated with either docetaxel regimen had consistently improved QoL compared with VC-treated patients, who experienced deterioration in QoL. CONCLUSION: DC resulted in a more favorable overall response and survival rate than VC. Both DC and DCb were better tolerated and provided patients with consistently improved QoL compared with VC. These findings demonstrate that a docetaxel plus platinum combination is an effective treatment option with a favorable therapeutic index for first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC.     

曲妥珠单抗联合拉帕替尼及多西紫杉醇一线治疗HER-2阳性晚期乳腺癌的安全性和有效性

目的:观察曲妥珠单抗联合拉帕替尼及多西紫杉醇一线治疗HER-2阳性晚期乳腺癌的安全性和有效性。方法:这是一项前瞻、单臂、开放标签的单中心Ⅱ期临床研究(ChiCTR1800015814)。HER-2阳性晚期乳腺癌一线治疗给予曲妥珠单抗(6 mg/kg,首剂8 mg/kg)联合拉帕替尼(1 000 mg/d)及多西紫杉醇(75 mg/m2),每3周重复。对非进展的患者继续用药直至疾病进展或毒性不可耐受,但最长用药时间不超过2年。主要研究终点是有效率,次要终点是PFS和OS。结果:自2016年9月至2019年5月共入组65例患者。本方案的剂量限制性毒性为腹泻,Ⅲ-Ⅳ度腹泻发生率为24.6%。总体有效率为69.2%(CR 3.1%,PR 66.1%),激素受体阴性患者有效率明显优于激素受体阳性患者(76.7% vs 57.1%,P＜0.01)。中位随访31个月,PFS为16.4个月(95%CI:13.4~19.6个月)。尚未达到中位OS时间。Log-rank检验显示是否内脏转移、是否多器官转移对PFS的影响具有统计学意义(P＜0.01和P=0.022)。结论:曲妥珠单抗联合拉帕替尼及多西紫杉醇毒性可耐受,疗效较好,作为HER-2阳性晚期乳腺癌一线治疗新的治疗策略,值得进一步研究。     

Phase II and pharmacologic study of weekly oral paclitaxel plus cyclosporine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: A phase II study was performed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of oral cyclosporine (CsA) plus paclitaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive or previously treated patients (one regimen) with measurable disease and World Health Organization performance status 相似文献   

Phase II study of weekly docetaxel alone or in combination with trastuzumab in patients with metastatic breast cancer

This study was designed to determine the efficacy and toxicity of weekly docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer when given alone (for HER2/neu negative disease) or with trastuzumab (for HER2/neu overexpressing disease). Patients with metastatic breast carcinoma received docetaxel given on 2 different schedules (group 1A, 33 mg/m2 weekly [n = 21]; group 1B, 40 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks with 1 week off [n = 14]). Patients with HER2/neu overexpressing disease also received trastuzumab 4 mg/kg on day 1, then 2 mg/kg on days 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle (group 2). Fifty-two patients were treated with docetaxel alone (group 1A/B, n = 35) or in combination with trastuzumab (group 2, n = 17). Prior taxane therapy given every 3 weeks had been used for metastatic disease in 19 of 35 patients (54%) in group 1A/B and in 2 of 17 patients (12%) in group 2. The mean delivered dose intensity of docetaxel was 29 mg/m2 per week. Partial response occurred in 7 of 35 patients (21%; 95% exact binomial confidence interval [CI], 9%-38%) treated with docetaxel alone, including 3 of 19 taxane-pretreated patients (16%) and 4 of 16 taxane-naive patients (25%). Partial response occurred in 10 of 17 patients (59%; 95% CI, 34%-82%) treated with docetaxel/trastuzumab. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities, occurring in more than or equal to 10% of patients, included neutropenia (21%), pulmonary toxicity (12%), and hyperglycemia (10%). The median times to disease progression were 4.5 months (95% CI, 2.5-6.5 months) in the docetaxel group and 8.5 months (95% CI, 4.5-12.5 months) in the docetaxel/trastuzumab group. Weekly docetaxel/trastuzumab is an effective regimen for patients with HER2/neu overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Weekly docetaxel may be effective in as many as 20% of patients who had progressive disease after treatment with taxanes given every 3 weeks.     

Cisplatin and weekly docetaxel as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer a phase II study

BACKGROUND: Based on the results of previous phase I studies, in the current phase II trial we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin plus weekly docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The eligibility criteria for the study included newly diagnosed stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, age < or = 75 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, adequate organ functions, and signed informed consent. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of cisplatin, 80 mg/m2 on day 1, and docetaxel, 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Between January 2002 and December 2003, 31 patients with NSCLC were enrolled in the study. An objective response rate of 40% (95% CI, 21-60) was obtained in 27 assessable patients. The median time to progression was 6.4 months (range, 2.5-26.3) and median overall survival was 10.01 months (range, 5-28.3). The regimen was well tolerated with no grade 4 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin plus weekly docetaxel is an effective and well-tolerated regimen in chemo-naive patients with advanced NSCLC. A phase III study of weekly versus the conventional regimen of every three weeks should be conducted to compare the survival benefits, toxicity profile and quality of life.     

Weekly paclitaxel plus trastuzumab in metastatic breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines-a phase II multipractice study

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The 3-weekly combination of trastuzumab and paclitaxel has been approved for the treatment of advanced breast cancer based on a large pivotal study. However, mono and combination chemotherapy trials suggest that weekly paclitaxel has a better therapeutic index, especially in the palliative setting. The present trial examined the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel over a limited duration combined with continued trastuzumab in HER2+ patients. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer overexpressing HER2 were eligible if pretreated with anthracycline in either the adjuvant or palliative setting. Treatment consisted of weekly trastuzumab (2 mg/kg/week for up to one year after a loading dose of 4 mg/kg in week 1) and paclitaxel (90 mg/m2, administered in weeks 1-6 and 8-13). RESULTS: Twenty-seven German centers enrolled 121 patients. The median number of metastatic sites was two (range 1-5); 38% of patients had received chemotherapy for advanced disease. After a median 42 weeks of trastuzumab treatment, limited by disease progression in roughly half the patients, a best objective response rate (complete response?+?partial response) of 76% was achieved, including complete remissions in 29%. 74% of patients lived without tumor progression at six months. Median progression-free and overall survival were 9.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1-11.3) and 22 months (95% CI: 17-46). After alopecia, Common Toxicity Criteria grade ≥2 toxicity was predominantly hematological (leukopenia [31%] and anemia [41%]); however, thrombocytopenia occurred in only 5%. Neurotoxicity was remarkably low. Two cardiac events (grades 2 and 3) were presumed treatment-related. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly paclitaxel plus trastuzumab allows an increased dose density and offers an attractive and effective alternative to the conventional schedule. Limiting the duration of cytotoxic therapy to 3 months seems to be an option to reduce neurotoxicity without impairing long-term outcome.     

The combination of carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel: a safe and active regimen in advanced non small-cell lung cancer patients. A phase I-II study

The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel given every three weeks is a tolerated and reasonably active regimen in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study was designed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a fixed dose of carboplatin with an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 and escalating doses of weekly paclitaxel with an initial dose of 50 mg/m2 with 10 mg/m2 increments at each level in untreated NSCLC patients (phase I study). The study continued with a phase II study. Thirty patients entered the phase I study. The MTD was: carboplatin AUC = 6 on days 1 and 28 plus paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 (1 hour) on days 1, 8,15, 28. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was severe neutropenia and cardiological toxicity. Subsequently, 42 patients entered the phase II study with the same treatment schedule. The 2-drug combination was globally well tolerated. The overall response rate (RR) was 42% [CI 95%: 26.3-57.7], stable disease (SD) 29% and progression (PD) 29%. The median duration of response was 8.0 mos (range: 1.0-19.0).The median time to progression was 8.0 mos (range: 7.0-19.0) and the median survival was 14.0 months (range: 9.0-19.0). The association of carboplatin AUC = 6 and weekly paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 proved to be manageable, active and extremely safe even in elderly patients (one third of all patients in our cohort). The survival results were interesting: the median survival time was 14 months (9-19 months) and the 1- and 2-year survival was 59% and 16%, respectively.     

Vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus docetaxel plus gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized trial.

PURPOSE To compare the activity and tolerability of docetaxel/gemcitabine (DG) and vinorelbine/cisplatin (VC) combinations in chemotherapy-naive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either DG (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) [days 1 and 8] plus docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) [day 8]) or VC (vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) [days 1 and 8] plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) [day 8]) and prophylactic recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (150 microg/m(2) subcutaneously [day 9 through 15]) every 3 weeks. Results A total of 413 randomly assigned patients were analyzed for response and toxicity (DG, n = 197; VC, n = 192). Median survival was 9.0 and 9.7 months (P = .965) for DG and VC arms, respectively; the corresponding 1-year survival rates were 34.3% and 40.8%, respectively. Overall response rate was 30% (95% CI, 23.9% to 36.3%) and 39.2% (95% CI, 32.5% to 45.9%; P = .053) for DG and VC, respectively. Toxicity was as follows (DG v VC): grade 2 to 4 anemia, 34% v 55% (P = .0001); grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, 16% v 37% (P = .0001); febrile neutropenia, 6% v 11% (P = .009); and grade 3 to 4 nausea and vomiting, 1% v 15% (P = .003). Nephrotoxicity occurred in 8% and ototoxicity in 2% of VC-treated patients. There were five and six treatment-related deaths in the DG and VC arms, respectively. Quality of life was improved in DG but not in VC patients. CONCLUSION Although the two regimens produced comparable overall survival, the DG regimen had a better toxicity profile. Therefore, DG could be used in the first-line setting of advanced NSCLC, especially for patients who cannot tolerate cisplatin.