Antinuclear antibodies following infliximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondylarthropathy

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of infliximab treatment on antinuclear antibodies (ANAs), anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA), antinucleosome, antihistone, and anti-extractable nuclear antigen (anti-ENA) antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondylarthropathy (SpA) patients. METHODS: Sera from 62 RA and 35 SpA patients treated with infliximab were tested at baseline and week 30 (RA group) or week 34 (SpA group). ANAs were tested by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on HEp-2 cells. Anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected by IIF on Crithidia luciliae and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and were further isotyped with gamma, mu, and alpha chain-specific conjugates at various time points. Antinucleosome antibodies were tested by ELISA. Antihistone and anti-ENA antibodies were detected by line immunoassay. RESULTS: Initially, 32 of 62 RA patients and 6 of 35 SpA patients tested positive for ANAs. After infliximab treatment, these numbers shifted to 51 of 62 (P < 0.001) and 31 of 35 (P < 0.001), respectively. At baseline, none of the RA or SpA patients had anti-dsDNA antibodies. After infliximab treatment, 7 RA patients (P = 0.016) and 6 SpA patients (P = 0.031) became positive for anti-dsDNA antibodies. All 7 anti-dsDNA-positive RA patients had IgM and IgA anti-dsDNA antibodies. Three of the 6 anti-dsDNA-positive SpA patients had IgM and IgA anti-dsDNA antibodies, and 2 had IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies alone. In both diseases, the IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies appeared before the IgA anti-dsDNA antibodies. During the observation period, no IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies or lupus symptoms were observed. The development of antinucleosome, antihistone, or anti-ENA antibodies following infliximab treatment was observed in some patients, but the numbers were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Infliximab treatment may induce ANAs, and especially IgM and IgA anti-dsDNA antibodies, in RA and SpA patients. However, no anti-dsDNA IgG antibodies or lupus symptoms were observed during the period of observation in this study, and the development of antinucleosome, antihistone, or anti-ENA antibodies was not statistically significant. These observations do not exclude potential induction of clinically significant lupus in the long term, and further followup is therefore mandatory.     

Infliximab,but not etanercept,induces IgM anti–double‐stranded DNA autoantibodies as main antinuclear reactivity: Biologic and clinical implications in autoimmune arthritis

Objective

To analyze the clinical and biologic correlates of autoantibody induction during longer‐term tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) blockade with either the monoclonal antibody infliximab or the soluble receptor etanercept.

Methods

Thirty‐four patients with spondylarthropathy (SpA) and 59 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were treated with infliximab for 2 years. Additionally, 20 patients with SpA were treated with etanercept for 1 year. Sera were blindly analyzed for antinuclear antibodies (ANAs), anti–double‐stranded DNA (anti‐dsDNA) antibodies, anti–extractable nuclear antigen (anti‐ENA) antibodies, and antihistone, antinucleosome, and anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL). The anti‐dsDNA antibodies were isotyped.

Results

High numbers of infliximab‐treated patients with SpA or RA had newly induced ANAs (61.8% and 40.7%, respectively) and anti‐dsDNA antibodies (70.6% and 49.2%, respectively) after 1 year, but no further increase between year 1 and year 2 was observed. In contrast, induction of ANAs and anti‐dsDNA antibodies was observed only occasionally in the etanercept‐treated patients with SpA (10% of patients each). Isotyping revealed almost exclusively IgM or IgM/IgA anti‐dsDNA antibodies, which disappeared upon interruption of treatment. Neither infliximab nor etanercept induced other lupus‐related reactivities such as anti‐ENA antibodies, antihistone antibodies, or antinucleosome antibodies, and no clinically relevant lupus‐like symptoms were observed. Similarly, infliximab but not etanercept selectively increased IgM but not IgG aCL titers.

Conclusion

The prominent ANA and anti‐dsDNA autoantibody response is not a pure class effect of TNFα blockers, is largely restricted to short‐term IgM responses, and is not associated with other serologic or clinical signs of lupus. Similar findings with aCL suggest that modulation of humoral immunity may be a more general feature of infliximab treatment.

     

Autoantibody formation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with anti-TNF alpha

Background: Research on autoantibody formation in patients treated with TNFα inhibitors has produced contradictory results. Objective: To study the prevalence of autoantibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with the TNFα inhibitor infliximab. Methods: 53 patients (48 female, 11 male) treated with infliximab for rheumatoid arthritis were followed for autoantibody production before treatment and after 14, 30, and 54 weeks. Six patients treated with etanercept were studied for comparison. The analyses included antibodies against nuclear antigens (ANA), extractable nuclear antigens, double stranded (ds)DNA (by ELISA, IIF on Crithidia luciliae for IgM and IgG, and Farr assay), nucleosomes, cardiolipin, smooth muscle, mitochondria, proteinase 3, and myeloperoxidase antigens. Results: The number of patients treated with infliximab who developed antibodies against dsDNA of both IgG and IgM class (tested by IIF) increased significantly. The prevalence of patients positive for IgG class increased to 66% at 30 weeks and 45% at 54 weeks, and of IgM class to 85% and 70%, respectively. The titre and number of patients expressing antibodies against nucleosomes and ANA also increased significantly. The number of rheumatoid factor or anticardiolipin positive patients was stable and there was no increase in antibodies against the other antigens. A lupus-like syndrome was seen in one patient. No patient treated with etanercept developed any of these autoantibodies. Conclusions: Patients treated with infliximab may develop anti-dsDNA antibodies of both IgM and IgG class, anti-nucleosome antibodies, and ANA, with a gradual increase until 30 weeks.     

The effect of TNFalpha blockade on the antinuclear antibody profile in patients with chronic arthritis: biological and clinical implications

Since the first proof of efficacy of TNFalpha blockade, both the number of patients treated worldwide and the number of indications for treatment with TNFalpha blockers have grown steadily. Surprisingly, the profound immunomodulation induced by anti-TNFalpha therapy is associated with a relatively low incidence of immune-related complications such as lupus-like syndromes and demyelinating disease. This contrasts sharply with the prominent induction of autoantibodies such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-dsDNA antibodies during TNFalpha blockade. Although this phenomenon has been recognized for several years, the clinical and biological implications are not yet fully understood. In this review, recent studies analysing the effect of TNFalpha blockade (infliximab and etanercept) on the ANA profile in autoimmune arthritis will be discussed. Taken together, these reports indicate that the prominent ANA and anti-dsDNA autoantibody response is 1) not a pure class effect of TNFalpha blockers, 2) independent of the disease background, 3) largely restricted to the induction of short-term IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies, and 4) not associated with other serological or clinically relevant signs of lupus. Nevertheless, a careful follow-up of patients treated with TNFalpha blockers remains mandatory, including monitoring for lupus-like characteristics.     

Induction of autoantibodies in refractory rheumatoid arthritis treated by infliximab

OBJECTIVES: To investigate autoantibody induction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with infliximab. METHODS: We included 59 refractory RA patients treated with infliximab in combination with low-dose prednisone and methotrexate or leflunomide. We tested the sera of the patients for antinuclear antibodies (ANA), rheumatoid factor (RF), anti double-stranded DNA antibodies (anti dsDNA), anti-histone and anti-extractable nuclear antigen antibodies (aENA) at baseline and before infusion at weeks 6 and 30. Infliximab, initiated at a dose of 3 mg/kg, was increased to 5 mg/kg if insufficient improvement was observed after three infusions. RESULTS: At week 6, only the frequency of anti-histone IgM antibody-positive patients had significantly increased (19 vs 42%, p = 0.009). At week 30, the frequency of patients with ANA had increased from 29% to 69% (p < 0.001), that of patients with anti-dsDNA antibodies had increased from 0% to 3% for IgG (NS) and from 0% to 32% for IgM (p < 0.001); the frequency of antihistone IgG detection had increased from 22% to 32% (p = 0.04) and that of IgM detection, from 18% to 79% (p < 0.001). No lupus-like syndrome was observed. RF decreased significantly (87 IU to 52.5 IU, from baseline to week 30; p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the 16 non-responders and the responders, in terms of autoantibody status at baseline and changes with infliximab therapy. CONCLUSION: Infliximab therapy lead to the selective and delayed induction of autoantibodies. This induction was not associated with clinical symptoms until week 30 and did not differ between responders and non-responders.     

Tumor necrosis factor alpha blockade treatment down-modulates the increased systemic and local expression of Toll-like receptor 2 and Toll-like receptor 4 in spondylarthropathy

OBJECTIVE: Abnormal host defense against pathogens has been implicated in the pathogenesis of spondylarthropathy (SpA), a disease characterized by abundant synovial infiltration with innate immune cells. Given the role of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in activation of innate inflammation and the occurrence of TLR-dependent infections after tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) blockade treatment, the present study was undertaken to analyze TLRs and their modulation by TNFalpha blockade in SpA. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were obtained from SpA and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients during infliximab therapy, and from healthy controls. TLR-2 and TLR-4 expression and TNFalpha production upon lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation were analyzed by flow cytometry on different monocyte subsets. Synovial biopsy specimens from 23 SpA patients before and after infliximab or etanercept treatment, from 15 RA patients, and from 18 osteoarthritis (OA) patients were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Expression of TLR-4, but not TLR-2, was increased on PBMCs from patients with SpA, whereas both TLRs were increased in RA patients. TLR expression was particularly increased on the CD163+ macrophage subset. Infliximab reduced TLR-2 and TLR-4 expression on monocytes of SpA and RA patients, leading to lower levels than in controls and to impaired TNFalpha production upon LPS stimulation. In inflamed synovium, the expression of both TLRs and of CD163 was significantly higher in patients with SpA than in those with RA or OA. Paralleling the systemic effect, TLRs in synovium were down-regulated following treatment with infliximab as well as etanercept, indicating a class effect of TNFalpha blockers. CONCLUSION: Inflammation in SpA is characterized by increased TLR-2 and TLR-4 expression, which is sharply reduced by TNFalpha blockade. These findings suggest a potential role of innate immunity-mediated inflammation in SpA and provide an additional clue regarding the mechanism of action as well as the potential side effects of TNFalpha blockade.     

Anti-nucleosome antibodies as prediction factor of development of autoantibodies during therapy with three different TNFα blocking agents in rheumatoid arthritis

Anti-nucleosome antibodies have a role in the diagnosis and follow-up of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and have a possible correlation with SLE activity and with kidney and hematological involvement. The aim of our study was to detect in 91 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) the positivity of anti-nucleosome antibodies during therapy with three different TNFα blocking agents and to underline the possible correlation with the development of antinuclear autoantibodies (ANA) and anti-dsDNA autoantibodies. We detected anti-nucleosome antibodies, ANA, and anti-dsDNA during therapy with three different TNFα blocking agents at T-0 and after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, respectively. Anti-nucleosome antibodies (IgG class) were analyzed by ELISA technique (Orgentec Diagnostika GmbH, Mainz, Germany), ANA both by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) technique on Hep-2 (Scimedx, USA) and by ELISA (Autoimmune EIA ANA screening test Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA, USA), and anti-dsDNA (IgG and IgM classes) by ELISA (Kallestad, Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA, USA) and confirmed by IIF on Crithidia luciliae (ImmunoConcepts N.A., Sacramento, CA, USA). We observed 19 patients on infliximab treatment at 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks, 43 patients on etanercept treatment at 25 mg twice a week, and 29 patients on adalimumab treatment at 40 mg every other week. At baseline, we observed positivity as follow: in the group of patients treated with infliximab—anti-nucleosome 1/19 (5.26%), ANA 3/19 (15.7%), anti-dsDNA 1/19 (5.26%); in the group treated with etanercept—anti-nucleosome 2/43 (4.65%), ANA 1/43 (2.43%), anti-dsDNA 0/43; and in the group treated with adalimumab—anti-nucleosome 2/29 (6.89%), ANA 1/29 (3.44%), anti-dsDNA 0/29. The results at 12 weeks for the three autoantibodies were: for infliximab—3/19 (15.7%), 10/19 (52.6%), 2/19 (10.5%); for etanercept—3/43 (6.9%), 10/43 (23.2%), 1/43 (2.32%); and for adalimumab—3/29 (10.3%), 4/29 (13.7%), 1/29 (3.4%). At 24 weeks, the results were for infliximab 6/19 (31.5%), 12/19 (63.1%), 2/19 (10.5%); for etanercept 11/43 (25.5%), 22/43 (51.1%), 2/43 (4.65%); and for adalimumab 4/29 (13.7%), 13/29 (44.8%), 1/29 (3.4%). We observed a concordance anti-nucleosome/ANA antibodies of 85.5% (p < 0.001). Our data showed a concordance between anti-nucleosome antibodies and ANA positivity in patients with RA during therapy with TNFα blocking agents. The induction of autoantibodies positivity is different for each TNFα blocking agent.     

Longitudinal study of antinuclear and anticardiolipin antibodies in pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome

The objective of this study was to perform a longitudinal follow-up of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) and anticardiolipin antibodies titers (aCL) throughout pregnancy in a group of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients during their therapy for the prevention of fetal loss and to examine their relationship with pregnancy outcome. Thirty patients and 15 controls were followed in the study. Fifteen patients had SLE (group I) and 15 had APS (group II, of which seven patients had primary APS and eight had APS secondary to SLE). All patients were receiving therapy for the prevention of fetal loss with prednisone and aspirin as part of an ongoing clinical trial in lupus pregnancy. If there was a history of previous thrombosis, heparin was added. Blood samples were taken at the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimesters (T) of pregnancy in order to assess the presence of IgG and IgM aCL antibodies (ELISA), anti-dsDNA ( C. luciliae) ANAs (HEp-2 cells), and immunospecific antibodies (antiextractable nuclear antigens). We collected 90 samples from patients and 45 samples from healthy controls. Group I (SLE) ANAs were positive in 100% during the 1st T, 67% in the 2nd T, and 67% in the 3rd T, with various immunofluorescence patterns. In five patients, aCL antibodies were detected without a history of APS (one in 1st T, three in 2nd T, and one in 3rd T). Fetal loss was observed in two patients, in one of whom it was associated with nephritis, high titers of ANAs, and anti-dsDNA. Another patient had pulmonary hemorrhage with anti-dsDNA and aCL. In group II, all but one patient with primary APS were negative to ANAs. In secondary APS, by contrast, 6/8 patients (75%) had positive ANAs at least during the 1st T. All seven patients with primary APS and 6/8 with secondary APS had aCL during pregnancy. In 9/15 (60%) patients from the APS group with a history of previous fetal loss, aCL became negative during pregnancy and they had live births. The disappearance of aCL was associated with improved fetal survival (relative risk, or RR, 0.67). ANAs in the control group were positive in 7% at low titers, and all of them were negative for aCL. Despite treatment, ANAs are prevalent during pregnancy in SLE patients and APS secondary to SLE. During pregnancy in SLE, aCL titers may appear. Decreasing titers and/or disappearance of aCL correlated with improved fetal prognosis in a subset of patients with APS.     

Utility of age,gender, ANA titer and pattern as predictors of anti-ENA and -dsDNA antibodies

Monovariate and multivariate analyses including logistic regression were performed to determine associations among predicting variables [age, gender, immunofluorescence pattern, and anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) titer] and anti-extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) and -dsDNA antibodies (Abs) in 1089 patients with positive fluorescent ANA (FANA) test results. Samples with high titer ANAs had an increased frequency of anti-ENA and -dsDNA Abs. The receiver operating (ROC) curves of the ANA titer for anti-ENA Abs had a larger under the curve area compared to the ROC curve for anti-dsDNA Abs, indicating that ANA titer is better for predicting anti-ENA Abs than anti-dsDNA Abs. There was no relation noticed between immunofluorescence patterns and anti-ENA and -dsDNA Abs except an increased frequency of anti-dsDNA Abs found in samples with a homogeneous pattern. Probability calculations on the basis of the ANA pattern and the titer showed that samples with low titer ANAs (1:160 or less) had low probabilities for anti-ENA Abs (0.002–0.009) regardless of immunofluorescence patterns. However, samples with a homogeneous pattern at any titers including low titers had high probabilities for anti-dsDNA Abs. A decreased frequency of anti-dsDNA Abs as measured by Crithidia assay was noticed in samples from patients aged 50 or older. In contrast, no association was noticed between age and anti-ENA Abs. There was no female preponderance found in the presence of anti-ENA and -dsDNA Abs. In conclusion, our study shows that the ANA titer but not the immunofluorescence pattern is useful in predicting anti-ENA Abs. In contrast, both the ANA titer and the immunofluorescence pattern help in predicting anti-dsDNA Abs. Samples with low titer ANAs (1:160 or less) may not need a further test for anti-ENA Abs unless an ANA-associated disease is highly suspected. However, a test for anti-dsDNA Abs should be considered in samples with a homogeneous pattern at any titer including low titers.     

Effects of short-term infliximab therapy on autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE: To analyze changes in autoantibodies occurring in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treated with 4 infusions of the chimeric anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) antibody infliximab. METHODS: In an open-label safety study, 7 patients with SLE were treated with infliximab at weeks 0, 2, 6, and 10 in combination with azathioprine or methotrexate. Antibodies to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) were determined by radioimmunoassay and the Crithidia luciliae indirect immunofluorescence assay; anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and antibodies to histone and chromatin were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Antihistone antibodies were also analyzed by immunoblotting. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy individuals and SLE patients were incubated for 2 weeks with or without TNFalpha. TNFalpha was removed by washing and by the addition of infliximab. Apoptotic cells were stained with annexin V and analyzed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Autoantibodies to dsDNA increased in 5 of 7 patients. Histone, chromatin, and IgM aCL levels were increased in 4 of 7, 6 of 7, and 4 of 7 patients, respectively, peaking 4-10 weeks after the last infliximab infusion, but falling to baseline levels or lower thereafter. In the in vitro experiments, TNF withdrawal after long-term incubation with recombinant human TNF led to increased percentages of apoptotic cells. CONCLUSION: While TNF blockade was clinically effective, the majority of SLE patients treated with infliximab showed an increase in autoantibodies to nuclear antigens and phospholipids. These increases were transient and were not associated with disease flares. Increased availability of apoptotic antigens after TNF blockade may play a role in the autoantibody formation induced by TNF blockade.     

Efficacy of etanercept for treatment of Crohn's related spondyloarthritis but not colitis

The seronegative spondyloarthropathies (SpAs) are associated both with clinical and subclinical colitis. Recently biological blockade with the tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) antagonists infliximab and etanercept has been shown to be effective in the treatment of SpA. However, only infliximab is efficacious in the treatment of colitis in patients with Crohn's SpA. We report on two patients with SpA and associated Crohn's disease treated with etanercept whose arthritis showed an excellent response with complete resolution of spinal pathology, whereas their Crohn's disease persisted or flared. These findings suggest that the effect of TNFalpha blockade in SpA differs between the joint and the bowel.     

Switching tumour necrosis factor alpha antagonists in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis: an observational study over a 5-year period

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical response after switching from one tumour necrosis factor (TNF)alpha antagonist to another in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: In this ongoing, longitudinal, observational study, data were prospectively collected on efficacy and safety since 2000 for patients starting biological treatments. The present analysis was restricted to patients with a diagnosis of spondyloarthropathy (SpA) who switched from one TNFalpha antagonist to another because of inadequate efficacy or adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 589 anti-TNFalpha-naive patients were registered, of whom 165 had a diagnosis of SpA; 7 patients with AS and 15 with PsA received >1 TNFalpha antagonist. Two patients with PsA were treated with all the drugs. In all, 16 subjects switched from infliximab to etanercept, 7 from etanercept to adalimumab and 1 from etanercept to infliximab. Overall, a clinical response was seen in 75% of patients who changed from infliximab to etanercept, and in 57.1% who switched from etanercept to adalimumab. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study on a selected population of patients with SpA indicate that the failure of an initial TNFalpha antagonist does not preclude the response to another one. Further trials are needed to confirm this preliminary observation.     

Assessment of antibodies to double-stranded DNA induced in rheumatoid arthritis patients following treatment with infliximab, a monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor alpha: findings in open-label and randomized placebo-controlled trials

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving either single or multiple doses of a chimeric anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFalpha) antibody or placebo infusions, with or without methotrexate, in open-label, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. METHODS: Multiple sera obtained from 156 patients before and after treatment with infliximab and from 37 patients treated with placebo infusions were tested for anti-dsDNA antibodies by 3 methods: Crithidia luciliae indirect immunofluorescence test (CLIFT), a commercial Farr assay (Ortho Diagnostics radioimmunoassay [RIA]) in which the antigen source is mammalian DNA, and a Farr assay employing 125I-labeled circular plasmid DNA (Central Laboratory of The Netherlands Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service [CLB] RIA). Patients with positive findings on the CLIFT were also tested for antibodies to histones (H1-H5) and chromatin and for IgM rheumatoid factors (IgM-RFs). RESULTS: None of the RA patients had a serum sample that was positive for anti-dsDNA antibodies by the CLIFT prior to infliximab therapy. Of the 22 patients who developed a positive CLIFT result, 11 (7% of 156 exposed to infliximab) also had positive findings on the Ortho RIA at a concentration of >10 units/ml and another 8 (5%) were positive at a concentration of >25 units/ml. In all but 1 patient, the anti-dsDNA antibodies were solely of the IgM isotype. Only 1 patient had detectable anti-dsDNA antibodies by the CLB RIA. All sera containing anti-dsDNA by the CLIFT contained antibodies to chromatin, and sera from 2 patients also contained antibodies to histones. IgM-RF titers showed a significant reduction following infliximab therapy in these 22 patients. One patient developed anti-dsDNA antibodies of IgG, IgA, and IgM isotype and had positive results on both Farr assays (peaking at 22 weeks and resolving by 54 weeks); this was associated with a reversible lupus syndrome. CONCLUSION: Anti-dsDNA antibodies of IgM class are induced by infliximab therapy; the frequency is dependent on the assay method used. Only 1 of the 156 patients who were treated with infliximab developed a self-limiting clinical lupus syndrome; that patient developed high titers of anti-dsDNA antibodies of IgG, IgM, and IgA class, as detected by the CLIFT and by 2 different Farr assays.     

Anti-nuclear antibodies, anti-DNA and C4 complement evolution in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis treated with TNF-alpha blockers

OBJECTIVE: To investigate autoantibody induction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in a cohort of French patients treated with TNF-alpha blockers. METHODS: We tested the serum of patients for antinuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-DNA antibodies and C4 complement at baseline, and for each infusion for infliximab, and at month 3, 6 and 12 for etanercept. We looked for all signs suggesting a drug-induced lupus. We tried to correlate ANA and anti-DNA development with various clinical data, especially the response to treatment. RESULTS: 229 patients were included in the study. 159 were treated with infliximab (98 RA and 61 AS) and 125 with etanercept (116 RA and 9 AS). In the infliximab group, 43.6% of RA patients and 27.1% of AS had significant levels of ANA at baseline. This proportion increased during the follow up to 73% in RA patients and 52% in AS patients. The proportion of patients positive for anti-DNA antibodies increased from 0% to 9.5% in RA group, and from 0% to 2% in AS group. In the etanercept group, 58.5% of these patients had significant levels of ANA at baseline; this proportion raised to 63.3% in patients previously treated with infliximab, and fell to 20.6% in the patients who never received TNF-alpha blockers. No significant variation of ANA, anti-DNA and C4 levels was observed in the etanercept group. Only three patients developed clinical manifestations (chilblain lupus) possibly related to these auto-antibodies, two with infliximab and one with etanercept. CONCLUSION: The ANA induction was only observed under infliximab therapy. Thus, ANA induction seems not to be a therapeutic class effect. This difference between infliximab and etanercept treatment may be the consequence of differential capacity of a monoclonal antibody and a soluble receptor in inducing apoptotic cell death of the cells expressing TNF on their membrane.     

IgG and IgM anticardiolipin antibodies following treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the occurrence of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate (MTX) versus MTX alone. METHODS: The first 299 patients enrolled in the randomized, Active-Controlled Study of Patients Receiving Infliximab for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis of Early Onset (ASPIRE) trial who had baseline (week 0) samples available for aCL testing were included in this study. Sera were collected at weeks 0, 30, and 54 from 110 patients taking infliximab 3 mg/kg plus MTX, 98 patients taking infliximab 6 mg/kg plus MTX, and 91 patients taking placebo plus MTX. IgG and IgM aCL were measured using an anticardiolipin assay. RESULTS: IgG and IgM aCL positivity at baseline was similar in all treatment groups. Most patients were negative for IgG aCL at baseline and remained so at the last followup evaluation. One percent (2 of 208) of patients who received infliximab plus MTX and were negative for IgG aCL at baseline were positive for IgG aCL at weeks 30 and 54. A slightly higher proportion of patients who received infliximab plus MTX and were negative for IgM aCL at baseline were positive for IgM aCL at weeks 30 and 54 (4.8% [10 of 208]) as compared with patients who received placebo plus MTX (1.1% [1 of 91]), but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: There was a low incidence of the development of aCL in patients with early RA who received infliximab in combination with MTX, and the difference was not significant compared with patients who received placebo plus MTX.     

Evolution of antinuclear antibodies and clinical patterns in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with longterm infliximab therapy

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of longterm infliximab therapy on serum levels of fluorescent antinuclear and anti-double and single-stranded DNA antibodies (FANA, anti-dsDNA, anti-ssDNA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and their possible association with clinical evolution. METHODS: Sera from 58 RA patients, treated for one to 3 years with infliximab, were retrospectively analyzed. Matched control groups were RA patients treated with corticosteroids or methotrexate. FANA were tested using HEp-2 cells, and anti-dsDNA and anti-ssDNA IgG by ELISA. After 28 months of infliximab therapy, clinical status was evaluated in 43/58 patients with uninterrupted therapy and associations with autoantibody levels were investigated. Data were documented for patients who discontinued infliximab. RESULTS: Over the 3 year period, significant increases in FANA and anti-ssDNA IgG levels were observed in infliximab treated patients (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). In 43 patients with an uninterrupted infliximab regimen, association was found between high FANA (>or= 1/1280) and lower age (p = 0.048) and patient's assessment of infliximab's efficacy (p = 0.014). Three patients developed anti-dsDNA IgG, preceded by high anti-ssDNA IgG levels, and one of them developed a lupus-like syndrome. Neither the initial presence of high FANA levels nor their increase >or= 1/1280 was significantly associated with discontinuation of infliximab. In contrast, at baseline (p = 0.0012) and at the time of infliximab discontinuation (p = 0.0078), anti-ssDNA IgG (>or= 500 arbitrary units) were more frequent in 7 patients who stopped infliximab due to skin or systemic anaphylactoid reactions. CONCLUSION: Monitoring of serum FANA, anti-dsDNA, and anti-ssDNA IgG antibodies provided predictors of lupus-like symptoms and/or anaphylactoid reactions in patients with RA.     

Anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha therapy for ankylosing spondylitis: international experience

The conventional approach to treatment of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA), particularly ankylosing spondylitis (AS), has serious limitations, adding a sense of urgency to the evaluation of new treatments for these rheumatic disorders. Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) is a cytokine that has been shown to mediate inflammatory and regulatory activities in SpA and other immune mediated diseases, including other arthritides and inflammatory bowel disease. Positive results have been reported in several international open label and randomised controlled trials of infliximab and etanercept, the two main biological agents targeting TNFalpha, which have included approximately 300 patients with SpA. Specifically, TNFalpha-directed therapy resulted in significant improvements in disease activity, function, and quality of life in these patients, most of whom had AS and received infliximab. Preliminary evidence from open label, long term extension trials suggests clinical benefit with continued use. Serious side effects were rare and consistent with experience from patient groups receiving infliximab or etanercept treatment for inflammatory bowel disease or rheumatoid arthritis. Together, these findings herald an age of more effective treatment of patients with AS with anti-TNFalpha and other emerging biological agents.     

High IgA rheumatoid factor levels are associated with poor clinical response to tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether rheumatoid factor isotypes and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies are related to clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) inhibitors. METHODS: The study was carried out on 132 patients with advanced rheumatoid arthritis refractory to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Patients were treated with infliximab (n = 63), etanercept (n = 35) or adalimumab (n = 34). All patients completed 1 year of follow-up, and 126 were evaluable for clinical response according to the disease activity score (DAS) criteria. IgM, IgA and IgG rheumatoid factors and anti-CCP antibodies were assessed by ELISA both before anti-TNFalpha treatment and 1 year later. RESULTS: The DAS response was reached in 66% of evaluable patients (61% infliximab, 65% etanercept and 76% adalimumab; p = 0.354). A significant reduction in the rheumatoid factor level was reported by all treatment groups after 1 year. The frequency of positive tests for the different antibodies did not differ between responders and non-responders at baseline; however, significantly higher IgA rheumatoid factor levels were reported by the non-responder group (130.4 U/ml (interquartile range 13.8-276.7) v 24.8 U/ml (10.2-90.8); p = 0.003). A significant decrease (p<0.001) in the levels of all rheumatoid factor isotypes in the responder group was reported after 1 year of treatment, whereas anti-CCP antibody levels were not significantly affected. CONCLUSIONS: According to the clinical response, anti-TNFalpha agents seem to reduce IgM, IgG and IgA rheumatoid factor levels. More interestingly, high pretreatment levels of IgA rheumatoid factor are associated with a poor clinical response to TNFalpha inhibitors.     

Antitumor necrosis factor therapy for inflammatory bowel disease: a review of agents, pharmacology, clinical results, and safety.

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha), a proinflammatory cytokine, plays an important role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Biotechnology agents including a chimeric monoclonal anti-TNF antibody (infliximab), a humanized monoclonal anti-TNF antibody (CDP571), and a recombinant TNF receptor fusion protein (etanercept) have been used to inhibit TNFalpha activity. Controlled trials have demonstrated efficacy for infliximab in moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD) and fistulizing CD sufficient to justify recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Additional trials have been completed in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Similarly, preliminary controlled trials have suggested efficacy for CDP571 in active CD and RA. Larger controlled trials have demonstrated efficacy for etanercept in RA patients who have failed disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy leading to FDA approval for RA. Toxicities observed with anti-TNF therapies have included formation of human antichimeric antibodies (HACA) with associated acute and delayed hypersensitivity infusion reactions, human antihuman antibodies (HAHAs), and formation of autoantibodies with rare instances of drug-induced lupus. Several cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma also has been described. Future studies should evaluate optimal timing and duration of anti-TNF therapy, the utility of adjuvant medical treatments during anti-TNF therapy, and evaluate long-term safety and efficacy of the various anti-TNF agents.     

Mechanisms for cytotoxic effects of anti-tumor necrosis factor agents on transmembrane tumor necrosis factor alpha-expressing cells: comparison among infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab

OBJECTIVE: Three anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFalpha) agents have been proved to be effective for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other inflammatory disorders. Infliximab and adalimumab have been generated as anti-TNFalpha monoclonal antibodies, while etanercept is engineered from human type II TNF receptors. In spite of all 3 agents' equal efficacy for RA, both infliximab and adalimumab are effective for other diseases such as Crohn's disease and Wegener's granulomatosis, while etanercept is not. We undertook this study to understand the different clinical effects of these anti-TNFalpha agents by analyzing their biologic activities on transmembrane TNFalpha. METHODS: Jurkat T cells stably expressing an uncleavable form of transmembrane TNFalpha were used for the following studies: 1) flow cytometric analysis of binding activities of anti-TNF agents to cell surface transmembrane TNFalpha, 2) complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), 3) antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) by using peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and 4) outside-to-inside (reverse) signal transduction through transmembrane TNFalpha estimated by apoptosis and cell cycle analysis using flow cytometry. RESULTS: All of the anti-TNFalpha agents bound to transmembrane TNFalpha. Infliximab and adalimumab exerted almost equal CDC activities, while etanercept showed considerably lower activity. ADCC activities were almost equal among these 3 agents. Adalimumab and infliximab induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in transmembrane TNFalpha-expressing Jurkat T cells, reflecting an outside-to-inside signal transduction through transmembrane TNFalpha. CONCLUSION: Three different anti-TNF agents showed different biologic effects on transmembrane TNFalpha. This finding suggests that CDC and outside-to-inside signals by anti-TNFalpha antibodies may explain the successful clinical efficacy of adalimumab and infliximab in Crohn's disease and Wegener's granulomatosis.