Neuromodulator release in neurons requires two functionally redundant calcium sensors

Neuropeptides and neurotrophic factors secreted from dense core vesicles (DCVs) control many brain functions, but the calcium sensors that trigger their secretion remain unknown. Here, we show that in mouse hippocampal neurons, DCV fusion is strongly and equally reduced in synaptotagmin-1 (Syt1)- or Syt7-deficient neurons, but combined Syt1/Syt7 deficiency did not reduce fusion further. Cross-rescue, expression of Syt1 in Syt7-deficient neurons, or vice versa, completely restored fusion. Hence, both sensors are rate limiting, operating in a single pathway. Overexpression of either sensor in wild-type neurons confirmed this and increased fusion. Syt1 traveled with DCVs and was present on fusing DCVs, but Syt7 supported fusion largely from other locations. Finally, the duration of single DCV fusion events was reduced in Syt1-deficient but not Syt7-deficient neurons. In conclusion, two functionally redundant calcium sensors drive neuromodulator secretion in an expression-dependent manner. In addition, Syt1 has a unique role in regulating fusion pore duration.

To date, over 100 genes encoding neuropeptides and neurotrophic factors, together referred to as neuromodulators, are identified, and most neurons express neuromodulators and neuromodulator receptors (1). Neuromodulators travel through neurons in dense core vesicles (DCVs) and, upon secretion, regulate neuronal excitability, synaptic plasticity, and neurite outgrowth (2–4). Dysregulation of DCV secretion is linked to many brain disorders (5–7). However, the molecular mechanisms that regulate neuromodulator secretion remain largely elusive.Neuromodulator secretion, like neurotransmitter secretion from synaptic vesicles (SVs), is tightly controlled by Ca²⁺. The Ca²⁺ sensors that regulate secretion have been described for other secretory pathways but not for DCV exocytosis in neurons. Synaptotagmin (Syt) and Doc2a/b are good candidate sensors due to their interaction with SNARE complexes, phospholipids, and Ca²⁺ (8–11). The Syt family consists of 17 paralogs (12, 13). Eight show Ca²⁺-dependent lipid binding: Syt1 to 3, Syt5 to 7, and Syt9 and 10 (14, 15). Syt1 mediates synchronous SV fusion (8), consistent with its low Ca²⁺-dependent lipid affinity (15, 16) and fast Ca²⁺/membrane dissociation kinetics (16, 17). Syt1 is also required for the fast fusion in chromaffin cells (18) and fast striatal dopamine release (19). Synaptotagmin-7 (Syt7), in contrast, drives asynchronous SV fusion (20), in line with its a higher Ca²⁺ affinity (15) and slower dissociation kinetics (16). Syt7 is also a major calcium sensor for neuroendocrine secretion (21) and secretion in pancreatic cells (22–24). Other sensors include Syt4, which negatively regulates brain-derived neurothropic factor (25) and oxytocin release (26), in line with its Ca²⁺ independency. Syt9 regulates hormone secretion in the anterior pituitary (27) and, together with Syt1, secretion from PC12 cells (28, 29). Syt10 controls growth factor secretion (30). However, Syt9 and Syt10 expression is highly restricted in the brain (31–33). Hence, the calcium sensors for neuronal DCV fusion remain largely elusive. Because DCVs are generally not located close to Ca²⁺ channels (34), we hypothesized that DCV fusion is triggered by high-affinity Ca²⁺ sensors. Because of their important roles in vesicle secretion, their Ca²⁺ binding ability, and their high expression levels in the brain (20, 31, 35–38), we addressed the roles of Doc2a/b, Syt1, and Syt7 in neuronal DCV fusion.In this study, we used primary Doc2a/b-, Syt1-, and Syt7-null (knockout, KO) neurons expressing DCV fusion reporters (34, 39–41) with single-vesicle resolution. We show that both Syt1 and Syt7, but not Doc2a/b, are required for ∼60 to 90% of DCV fusion events. Deficiency of both Syt1 and Syt7 did not produce an additive effect, suggesting they function in the same pathway. Syt1 overexpression (Syt1-OE) rescued DCV fusion in Syt7-null neurons, and vice versa, indicating that the two proteins compensate for each other in DCV secretion. Moreover, overexpression of Syt1 or Syt7 in wild-type (WT) neurons increased DCV fusion, suggesting they are both rate limiting for DCV secretion. We conclude that DCV fusion requires two calcium sensors, Syt1 and Syt7, that act in a single/serial pathway and that both sensors regulate fusion in a rate-limiting and dose-dependent manner.     

Conditional destabilization of the TPLATE complex impairs endocytic internalization

In plants, endocytosis is essential for many developmental and physiological processes, including regulation of growth and development, hormone perception, nutrient uptake, and defense against pathogens. Our toolbox to modulate this process is, however, rather limited. Here, we report a conditional tool to impair endocytosis. We generated a partially functional TPLATE allele by substituting the most conserved domain of the TPLATE subunit of the endocytic TPLATE complex (TPC). This substitution destabilizes TPC and dampens the efficiency of endocytosis. Short-term heat treatment increases TPC destabilization and reversibly delocalizes TPLATE from the plasma membrane to aggregates in the cytoplasm. This blocks FM uptake and causes accumulation of various known endocytic cargoes at the plasma membrane. Short-term heat treatment therefore transforms the partially functional TPLATE allele into an effective conditional tool to impair endocytosis. Next to their role in endocytosis, several TPC subunits are also implicated in actin-regulated autophagosomal degradation. Inactivating TPC via the WDX mutation, however, does not impair autophagy, thus enabling specific and reversible modulation of endocytosis in planta.

Endocytosis is an evolutionarily conserved eukaryotic pathway by which extracellular material and plasma membrane (PM) components are internalized via vesicles (1, 2). Clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME), relying on the scaffolding protein clathrin, is the most prominent and the most studied endocytic pathway (3–5). As clathrin does not interact directly with the PM, nor does it recognize cargoes, adaptor proteins are required to act as essential links between the clathrin coat and the PM (6). In plant cells, material selected for CME is recognized by two adaptor complexes, the adaptor complex 2 (AP-2) and the TPLATE complex (TPC) (7–9). In contrast to TPC, single subunit mutants of AP-2 are viable (7, 8, 10–13) and AP-2 recruitment and dynamics appear to rely on TPC function (8, 14).TPC represents an ancestral adaptor complex, which is however absent in present-day metazoans and yeasts. It was experimentally identified as an octameric complex in Arabidopsis and as a hexametric complex in Dictyostelium (8, 15). Plants, however, are the only eukaryotic supergroup identified so far where TPC is essential for life (8, 15), as knockout or severe knockdown of single subunits of TPC in Arabidopsis leads to pollen or seedling lethality, respectively (8, 13). Two TPC subunits, AtEH1/Pan1 and AtEH2/Pan1, were not associated with the other TPC core components when the complex was forced into the cytoplasm by truncating the TML subunit and did not copurify with the other TSET components in Dictyostelium. This indicates that they may be auxiliary components to the core TPC (8, 15). These AtEH/Pan1 proteins were recently identified as important players in actin-regulated autophagy in plants. AtEH/Pan1 proteins recruit several components of the endocytic machinery to the autophagosomes, and are degraded together with them under stress conditions (16). However, whether this pathway serves to degrade specific cargoes or to regulate the endocytic machinery itself (17), and whether the whole TPC is required for this degradation pathway, remains unclear.Genetic and chemical tools to manipulate endocytosis have been extensively investigated via interfering with the functions of endocytic players, such as clathrin (18–22), adaptor proteins (7, 10–12, 14, 23–25), and dynamin-related proteins (26–30). The chemical inhibitors originally used to affect CME in plants have recently been described to possess undesirable side effects (31) or to affect proteins that are not only specific for endocytosis: for example, clathrin itself, as it is also involved in TGN trafficking (19, 22). The same is true for several genetic tools currently available to affect CME in plants (18, 21, 22, 30). Manipulation of TPC, functioning exclusively at the PM, represents a very good candidate to affect CME more specifically. So far however, there are no chemical tools to target TPC functions or dominant-negative mutants available. Inducible silencing works, but causes seedling lethality and takes several days to become effective (8). The only tools to manipulate TPC function in viable plants consist of knock-down mutants with very mild reduction of expression and consequently similar mild effects on CME (8, 14, 16, 32).     

Discriminating symbiosis and immunity signals by receptor competition in rice

Plants encounter various microbes in nature and must respond appropriately to symbiotic or pathogenic ones. In rice, the receptor-like kinase OsCERK1 is involved in recognizing both symbiotic and immune signals. However, how these opposing signals are discerned via OsCERK1 remains unknown. Here, we found that receptor competition enables the discrimination of symbiosis and immunity signals in rice. On the one hand, the symbiotic receptor OsMYR1 and its short-length chitooligosaccharide ligand inhibit complex formation between OsCERK1 and OsCEBiP and suppress OsCERK1 phosphorylating the downstream substrate OsGEF1, which reduces the sensitivity of rice to microbe-associated molecular patterns. Indeed, OsMYR1 overexpression lines are more susceptible to the fungal pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae, whereas Osmyr1 mutants show higher resistance. On the other hand, OsCEBiP can bind OsCERK1 and thus block OsMYR1–OsCERK1 heteromer formation. Consistently, the Oscebip mutant displayed a higher rate of mycorrhizal colonization at early stages of infection. Our results indicate that OsMYR1 and OsCEBiP receptors compete for OsCERK1 to determine the outcome of symbiosis and immunity signals.

In nature, plants live and interact with diverse microbes, including symbionts and pathogens. To discern friends from foes, plants have evolved various receptors that sense external microbes. Plant immune responses are triggered when pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) at the plasma membrane recognize microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) (1). MAMPs are highly conserved molecular signatures within a class of microbes and include fungal chitin, bacterial flagellin, and elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) (2). PRRs comprise receptor-like kinases and receptor-like proteins (3). In plant–symbiont interactions, receptor kinases at the plasma membrane recognize signals that trigger symbiosis (4, 5).Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi secrete short-chain chitooligosaccharides (COs) and nonsulfated lipochitooligosaccharides (LCOs), called mycorrhizal factors (Myc factors), that are recognized by plant receptors and mediate the establishment of AM symbiosis (6–14). In rice, perception of the AM symbiotic signal is mediated by a lysin motif (LysM)–containing receptor kinase (LYKs), OsMYR1, that directly binds to CO4 and subsequently interacts with OsCERK1 (8). Interestingly, OsCERK1 is also a well-known receptor involved in MAMP-triggered immunity (15–17). In rice, an OsCERK1–OsCEBiP receptor complex recognizes chitin and triggers immune responses (18). Additionally, OsCERK1 interacts with OsLYP4 and OsLYP6 to participate in peptidoglycan perception (19). Thus, OsCERK1 is a node that crosses immunity and symbiosis.Fungal cell walls consist of about 1 to 20% chitin, which is a long-chain polymer of N-acetylglucosamine. To protect themselves from fungal infection, plants secrete chitinases that break down chitin and release COs (20). Long-chain COs are recognized by specific receptors and trigger immunity, whereas short-chain COs are associated with non-stress–related plant responses (21). Similarly, in mammals, shorter oligomers induce a weaker defense response than longer oligomers (22). Intriguingly, although chitin is the principal component of AM fungi, AM symbiosis triggers only a weak defense response (23, 24). Moreover, pretreatment of plants with CO4 also suppresses their defense response (21), implying that CO4 and OsMYR1 might suppress defense responses during AM symbiosis. However, the mechanism remains unclear.Interestingly, a recent study reported that COs ranging from four to eight residues in length (CO4 to CO8) can serve as symbiotic signals in Medicago truncatula, although CO8 is typically considered an immunity signal (9, 25). In rice, LCOs cannot induce symbiotic calcium oscillations, and short-chain COs are the major symbiotic signals from mycorrhizal fungi (26). In this study, we found that the shorter-chain chitooligosaccharide CO4 and its receptor OsMYR1 can suppress immune signaling induced by CO8 in rice. Our data indicate that the balanced perception of CO4 and CO8 by the symbiotic receptor OsMYR1, and the MAMP receptor OsCEBiP is crucial for the establishment of AM symbiosis in rice.     

Conditions and extent of volatile loss from the Moon during formation of the Procellarum basin

Rocks from the lunar interior are depleted in moderately volatile elements (MVEs) compared to terrestrial rocks. Most MVEs are also enriched in their heavier isotopes compared to those in terrestrial rocks. Such elemental depletion and heavy isotope enrichments have been attributed to liquid–vapor exchange and vapor loss from the protolunar disk, incomplete accretion of MVEs during condensation of the Moon, and degassing of MVEs during lunar magma ocean crystallization. New Monte Carlo simulation results suggest that the lunar MVE depletion is consistent with evaporative loss at 1,670 ± 129 K and an oxygen fugacity +2.3 ± 2.1 log units above the fayalite-magnetite-quartz buffer. Here, we propose that these chemical and isotopic features could have resulted from the formation of the putative Procellarum basin early in the Moon’s history, during which nearside magma ocean melts would have been exposed at the surface, allowing equilibration with any primitive atmosphere together with MVE loss and isotopic fractionation.

Returned samples of basaltic rocks from the Moon provided evidence decades ago that the Moon is depleted in volatile elements compared to the Earth (1), with lunar basalt abundances of moderately volatile elements (MVEs) being ∼1/5 that of terrestrial basalt abundances for alkali elements and ∼1/40 for other MVE, such as Zn, Ag, In, and Cd (2). The theme of lunar volatiles thus seemed settled. Yet, the unambiguous detection in 2008 of lunar indigenous hydrogen and other volatile elements, such as F, Cl, and S in pyroclastic glasses (3), heralded a new era of research into lunar volatiles, overturning the decades-old paradigm of a bone-dry Moon (e.g., refs. 4 and 5). Here, we define volatile elements as those with 50% condensation temperatures below these of the major rock-forming elements Fe, Mg, and Si (6). This paradigm shift was accompanied by new measurements of volatile stable isotope compositions (e.g., H, C, N, Cl, K, Cr, Cu, Zn, Ga, Rb, and Sn) in a wealth of bulk lunar samples (7–18) and in the mineral phases and melt inclusions they host (19–28). These studies have shown that the stable isotope compositions of most MVEs (e.g., K, Zn, Ga, and Rb) are enriched in their heavier isotopes with respect to the bulk silicate Earth (BSE) (9, 11, 13–15, 17). Such heavy isotope enrichment is associated with elemental depletion, which has been variously attributed to liquid–vapor exchange and vapor loss from the protolunar disk (17, 18), incomplete accretion of MVEs during condensation of the Moon (13, 29, 30), and degassing of these elements during lunar magma ocean crystallization (9, 11, 14, 15, 25, 31). Almost all these hypotheses have typically assumed that the MVE depletions and associated MVE isotope fractionations are relevant to the whole Moon. However, our lunar sample collections are biased, as all Apollo and Luna returned samples come from the lunar nearside from within or around the anomalous Procellarum KREEP Terrane (PKT) region (e.g., ref. 32), where KREEP stands for enriched in K, REEs, and P. Barnes et al. (26) proposed that the heavy Cl isotope signature measured in KREEP-rich Apollo samples resulted from metal-chloride degassing from late-stage lunar magma ocean melts in response to a large crust-breaching impact event, spatially associated with the PKT region, which facilitated exposure of these late-stage melts to the lunar surface. Here, we further investigate whether a localized impact event could have been responsible for the general MVE depletion and heavy MVE isotope enrichment measured in lunar samples.     

Stage-specific overcompensation,the hydra effect,and the failure to eradicate an invasive predator

As biological invasions continue to increase globally, eradication programs have been undertaken at significant cost, often without consideration of relevant ecological theory. Theoretical fisheries models have shown that harvest can actually increase the equilibrium size of a population, and uncontrolled studies and anecdotal reports have documented population increases in response to invasive species removal (akin to fisheries harvest). Both findings may be driven by high levels of juvenile survival associated with low adult abundance, often referred to as overcompensation. Here we show that in a coastal marine ecosystem, an eradication program resulted in stage-specific overcompensation and a 30-fold, single-year increase in the population of an introduced predator. Data collected concurrently from four adjacent regional bays without eradication efforts showed no similar population increase, indicating a local and not a regional increase. Specifically, the eradication program had inadvertently reduced the control of recruitment by adults via cannibalism, thereby facilitating the population explosion. Mesocosm experiments confirmed that adult cannibalism of recruits was size-dependent and could control recruitment. Genomic data show substantial isolation of this population and implicate internal population dynamics for the increase, rather than recruitment from other locations. More broadly, this controlled experimental demonstration of stage-specific overcompensation in an aquatic system provides an important cautionary message for eradication efforts of species with limited connectivity and similar life histories.

Theoretical population models can produce counterintuitive predictions regarding the consequences of harvest or removal of predatory species. These models show that for simple predator-prey systems, there can be positive population responses to predator mortality resulting from harvest for fisheries or population management, which can create an increased equilibrium level of that predator species (1–5). Among these mortality processes is the “hydra effect,” named after the mythical multi-headed serpent that grew two new heads for each one that was removed (6, 7). This counterintuitive outcome can be driven by a density-dependent process known as overcompensation. The hydra effect typically refers to higher equilibrium or time-averaged densities in response to increased mortality, typically involving consumer populations undergoing population cycles. Population increases in response to mortality can be the result of stage-specific overcompensation, which involves an increase in a specific life history stage or a size class following increased mortality. The first analysis of overcompensatory responses to mortality did not depend on stage specificity and was applied initially to fisheries harvests (1). Subsequent models have included stage specificity and have been applied to a broad range of systems in which species have been harvested for consumption or removed for population control of non-native species (4, 5, 8–15).Theory suggests that overcompensation in response to harvest or removal can occur for a variety of reasons, including 1) reduced competition for resources and increased adult reproduction rates, 2) faster rates of juvenile maturation or greater success in reaching the adult stage, and 3) increased juvenile or adult survival rates (1–7). An increase in reproductive output in response to reduced adult density can be the result of a reduction in resource competition (SI Appendix, Fig. S1).While there is substantial evidence that conditions that could produce density-dependent overcompensation occur frequently, evidence for overcompensation in natural populations is rare. For only a few populations do we have the long-term demographic data collected over a sufficiently long duration and for population densities over a wide enough range to detect this effect. Unfortunately, recent reviews of population increases in response to increased mortality do not include field studies with explicit controls for removals (13–17).There are examples of density-dependent overcompensation from field populations (4, 13–15), as well as a larger number of studies from the laboratory and greenhouse typically involving plant and insect populations (18–22). Among the field examples is a population control program for smallmouth bass in a lake in upstate New York, which paradoxically resulted in greater bass abundance, primarily of juveniles, after 7 y of removal efforts (23, 24). Another field study in the United Kingdom showed that perch populations responded similarly when an unidentified pathogen decimated adults (25). Other programs that attempted to remove invasive fishes, including pikeperch in England (26), brook trout in Idaho (27), and Tilapia in Australia (28), showed similar results. However, although many of these examples involved well-executed studies with substantial field data, none had explicit controls for removal, such as comparable populations without harvest (or disease). Thus, despite the support of current theory in these studies, the contribution of external factors to observed population responses to harvest remains uncertain. To date, we are unaware of any experimental studies with comparable controls in a field population that demonstrates overcompensation in a single species (13–15).     

INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:The effect of parathyroid hormone on osteogenesis is mediated partly by osteolectin

We previously described a new osteogenic growth factor, osteolectin/Clec11a, which is required for the maintenance of skeletal bone mass during adulthood. Osteolectin binds to Integrin α11 (Itga11), promoting Wnt pathway activation and osteogenic differentiation by leptin receptor⁺ (LepR⁺) stromal cells in the bone marrow. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) and sclerostin inhibitor (SOSTi) are bone anabolic agents that are administered to patients with osteoporosis. Here we tested whether osteolectin mediates the effects of PTH or SOSTi on bone formation. We discovered that PTH promoted Osteolectin expression by bone marrow stromal cells within hours of administration and that PTH treatment increased serum osteolectin levels in mice and humans. Osteolectin deficiency in mice attenuated Wnt pathway activation by PTH in bone marrow stromal cells and reduced the osteogenic response to PTH in vitro and in vivo. In contrast, SOSTi did not affect serum osteolectin levels and osteolectin was not required for SOSTi-induced bone formation. Combined administration of osteolectin and PTH, but not osteolectin and SOSTi, additively increased bone volume. PTH thus promotes osteolectin expression and osteolectin mediates part of the effect of PTH on bone formation.

The maintenance and repair of the skeleton require the generation of new bone cells throughout adult life. Osteoblasts are relatively short-lived cells that are constantly regenerated, partly by skeletal stem cells within the bone marrow (1). The main source of new osteoblasts in adult bone marrow is leptin receptor-expressing (LepR⁺) stromal cells (2–4). These cells include the multipotent skeletal stem cells that give rise to the fibroblast colony-forming cells (CFU-Fs) in the bone marrow (2), as well as restricted osteogenic progenitors (5) and adipocyte progenitors (6–8). LepR⁺ cells are a major source of osteoblasts for fracture repair (2) and growth factors for hematopoietic stem cell maintenance (9–11).One growth factor synthesized by LepR⁺ cells, as well as osteoblasts and osteocytes, is osteolectin/Clec11a, a secreted glycoprotein of the C-type lectin domain superfamily (5, 12, 13). Osteolectin is an osteogenic factor that promotes the maintenance of the adult skeleton by promoting the differentiation of LepR⁺ cells into osteoblasts. Osteolectin acts by binding to integrin α11β1, which is selectively expressed by LepR⁺ cells and osteoblasts, activating the Wnt pathway (12). Deficiency for either Osteolectin or Itga11 (the gene that encodes integrin α11) reduces osteogenesis during adulthood and causes early-onset osteoporosis in mice (12, 13). Recombinant osteolectin promotes osteogenic differentiation by bone marrow stromal cells in culture and daily injection of mice with osteolectin systemically promotes bone formation.Osteoporosis is a progressive condition characterized by reduced bone mass and increased fracture risk (14). Several factors contribute to osteoporosis development, including aging, estrogen insufficiency, mechanical unloading, and prolonged glucocorticoid use (14). Existing therapies include antiresorptive agents that slow bone loss, such as bisphosphonates (15, 16) and estrogens (17), and anabolic agents that increase bone formation, such as parathyroid hormone (PTH) (18), PTH-related protein (19), and sclerostin inhibitor (SOSTi) (20). While these therapies increase bone mass and reduce fracture risk, they are not a cure.PTH promotes both anabolic and catabolic bone remodeling (21–24). PTH is synthesized by the parathyroid gland and regulates serum calcium levels, partly by regulating bone formation and bone resorption (23–25). PTH1R is a PTH receptor (26, 27) that is strongly expressed by LepR⁺ bone marrow stromal cells (8, 28–30). Recombinant human PTH (Teriparatide; amino acids 1 to 34) and synthetic PTH-related protein (Abaloparatide) are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of osteoporosis (19, 31). Daily (intermittent) administration of PTH increases bone mass by promoting the differentiation of osteoblast progenitors, inhibiting osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis, and reducing sclerostin levels (32–35). PTH promotes osteoblast differentiation by activating Wnt and BMP signaling in bone marrow stromal cells (28, 36, 37), although the mechanisms by which it regulates Wnt pathway activation are complex and uncertain (38).Sclerostin is a secreted glycoprotein that inhibits Wnt pathway activation by binding to LRP5/6, a widely expressed Wnt receptor (7, 8), reducing bone formation (39, 40). Sclerostin is secreted by osteocytes (8, 41), negatively regulating bone formation by inhibiting the differentiation of osteoblasts (41, 42). SOSTi (Romosozumab) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds sclerostin, preventing binding to LRP5/6 and increasing Wnt pathway activation and bone formation (43). It is FDA-approved for the treatment of osteoporosis (20, 44) and has activity in rodents in addition to humans (45, 46).The discovery that osteolectin is a bone-forming growth factor raises the question of whether it mediates the effects of PTH or SOSTi on osteogenesis.     

Tropospheric carbonyl sulfide mass balance based on direct measurements of sulfur isotopes

Robust estimates for the rates and trends in terrestrial gross primary production (GPP; plant CO₂ uptake) are needed. Carbonyl sulfide (COS) is the major long-lived sulfur-bearing gas in the atmosphere and a promising proxy for GPP. Large uncertainties in estimating the relative magnitude of the COS sources and sinks limit this approach. Sulfur isotope measurements (³⁴S/³²S; δ³⁴S) have been suggested as a useful tool to constrain COS sources. Yet such measurements are currently scarce for the atmosphere and absent for the marine source and the plant sink, which are two main fluxes. Here we present sulfur isotopes measurements of marine and atmospheric COS, and of plant-uptake fractionation experiments. These measurements resulted in a complete data-based tropospheric COS isotopic mass balance, which allows improved partition of the sources. We found an isotopic (δ³⁴S ± SE) value of 13.9 ± 0.1‰ for the troposphere, with an isotopic seasonal cycle driven by plant uptake. This seasonality agrees with a fractionation of −1.9 ± 0.3‰ which we measured in plant-chamber experiments. Air samples with strong anthropogenic influence indicated an anthropogenic COS isotopic value of 8 ± 1‰. Samples of seawater-equilibrated-air indicate that the marine COS source has an isotopic value of 14.7 ± 1‰. Using our data-based mass balance, we constrained the relative contribution of the two main tropospheric COS sources resulting in 40 ± 17% for the anthropogenic source and 60 ± 20% for the oceanic source. This constraint is important for a better understanding of the global COS budget and its improved use for GPP determination.

The Earth system is going through rapid changes as the climate warms and CO₂ level rises. This rise in CO₂ is mitigated by plant uptake; hence, it is important to estimate global and regional photosynthesis rates and trends (1). Yet, robust tools for investigating these processes at a large scale are scarce (2). Recent studies suggest that carbonyl sulfide (COS) could provide an improved constraint on terrestrial photosynthesis (gross primary production, GPP) (2–12). COS is the major long-lived sulfur-bearing gas in the atmosphere and the main supplier of sulfur to the stratospheric sulfate aerosol layer (13), which exerts a cooling effect on the Earth’s surface and regulates stratospheric ozone chemistry (14).During terrestrial photosynthesis, COS diffuses into leaf stomata and is consumed by photosynthetic enzymes in a similar manner to CO₂ (3–5). Contrary to CO₂, COS undergoes rapid and irreversible hydrolysis mainly by the enzyme carbonic-anhydrase (6, 7). Thus, COS can be used as a proxy for the one-way flux of CO₂ removal from the atmosphere by terrestrial photosynthesis (2, 8–11). However, the large uncertainties in estimating the COS sources weaken this approach (10–12, 15). Tropospheric COS has two main sources: the oceans and anthropogenic emissions, and one main sink–terrestrial plant uptake (8, 10–13). Smaller sources include biomass burning, soil emissions, wetlands, volcanoes, and smaller sinks include OH destruction, stratospheric destruction, and soil uptake (12). The largest source of COS to the atmosphere is the ocean, both as direct COS emission, and as indirect carbon disulfide (CS₂) and dimethylsulfide (DMS) emissions that are rapidly oxidized to COS (10, 16–20). Recent studies suggest oceanic COS emissions are in the range of 200–4,000 GgS/y (19–22). The second major COS source is the anthropogenic source, which is dominated by indirect emissions derived from CS₂ oxidation, mainly from the use of CS₂ as an industrial solvent. Direct emissions of COS are mainly derived from coal and fuel combustion (17, 23, 24). Recent studies suggest that anthropogenic emissions are in the range of 150–585 GgS/y (23, 24). The terrestrial plant uptake is estimated to be in the range of 400–1,360 GgS/y (11). Measurements of sulfur isotope ratios (δ³⁴S) in COS may be used to track COS sources and thus reduce the uncertainties in their flux estimations (15, 25–27). However, the isotopic mass balance approach works best if the COS end members are directly measured and have a significantly different isotopic signature. Previous δ³⁴S measurements of atmospheric COS are scarce and there have been no direct measurements of two important components: the δ³⁴S of oceanic COS emissions, and the isotopic fractionation of COS during plant uptake (15, 25–27). In contrast to previous studies that used assessments for these isotopic values, our aim was to directly measure the isotopic values of these missing components, and to determine the tropospheric COS δ³⁴S variability over space and time.     

Chemokine CCL5 promotes robust optic nerve regeneration and mediates many of the effects of CNTF gene therapy

Ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) is a leading therapeutic candidate for several ocular diseases and induces optic nerve regeneration in animal models. Paradoxically, however, although CNTF gene therapy promotes extensive regeneration, recombinant CNTF (rCNTF) has little effect. Because intraocular viral vectors induce inflammation, and because CNTF is an immune modulator, we investigated whether CNTF gene therapy acts indirectly through other immune mediators. The beneficial effects of CNTF gene therapy remained unchanged after deleting CNTF receptor alpha (CNTFRα) in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), the projection neurons of the retina, but were diminished by depleting neutrophils or by genetically suppressing monocyte infiltration. CNTF gene therapy increased expression of C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) in immune cells and retinal glia, and recombinant CCL5 induced extensive axon regeneration. Conversely, CRISPR-mediated knockdown of the cognate receptor (CCR5) in RGCs or treating wild-type mice with a CCR5 antagonist repressed the effects of CNTF gene therapy. Thus, CCL5 is a previously unrecognized, potent activator of optic nerve regeneration and mediates many of the effects of CNTF gene therapy.

Like most pathways in the mature central nervous system (CNS), the optic nerve cannot regenerate once damaged due in part to cell-extrinsic suppressors of axon growth (1, 2) and the low intrinsic growth capacity of adult retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), the projection neurons of the eye (3–5). Consequently, traumatic or ischemic optic nerve injury or degenerative diseases such as glaucoma lead to irreversible visual losses. Experimentally, some degree of regeneration can be induced by intraocular inflammation or growth factors expressed by inflammatory cells (6–10), altering the cell-intrinsic growth potential of RGCs (3–5), enhancing physiological activity (11, 12), chelating free zinc (13, 14), and other manipulations (15–19). However, the extent of regeneration achieved to date remains modest, underlining the need for more effective therapies.Ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) is a leading therapeutic candidate for glaucoma and other ocular diseases (20–23). Activation of the downstream signal transduction cascade requires CNTF to bind to CNTF receptor-α (CNTFRα) (24), which leads to recruitment of glycoprotein 130 (gp130) and leukemia inhibitory factor receptor-β (LIFRβ) to form a tripartite receptor complex (25). CNTFRα anchors to the plasma membrane through a glycosylphosphatidylinositol linkage (26) and can be released and become soluble through phospholipase C-mediated cleavage (27). CNTF has been reported to activate STAT3 phosphorylation in retinal neurons, including RGCs, and to promote survival, but it is unknown whether these effects are mediated by direct action of CNTF on RGCs via CNTFRα (28). Our previous studies showed that CNTF promotes axon outgrowth from neonate RGCs in culture (29) but fails to do so in cultured mature RGCs (8) or in vivo (6). Although some studies report that recombinant CNTF (rCNTF) can promote optic nerve regeneration (20, 30, 31), others find little or no effect unless SOCS3 (suppressor of cytokine signaling-3), an inhibitor of the Jak-STAT pathway, is deleted in RGCs (5, 6, 32). In contrast, multiple studies show that adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated expression of CNTF in RGCs induces strong regeneration (33–40). The basis for the discrepant effects of rCNTF and CNTF gene therapy is unknown but is of considerable interest in view of the many promising clinical and preclinical outcomes obtained with CNTF to date.Because intravitreal virus injections induce inflammation (41), we investigated the possibility that CNTF, a known immune modulator (42–44), might act by elevating expression of other immune-derived factors. We report here that the beneficial effects of CNTF gene therapy in fact require immune system activation and elevation of C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5). Depletion of neutrophils, global knockout (KO) or RGC-selective deletion of the CCL5 receptor CCR5, or a CCR5 antagonist all suppress the effects of CNTF gene therapy, whereas recombinant CCL5 (rCCL5) promotes axon regeneration and increases RGC survival. These studies point to CCL5 as a potent monotherapy for optic nerve regeneration and to the possibility that other applications of CNTF and other forms of gene therapy might similarly act indirectly through other factors.     

Replisome bypass of a protein-based R-loop block by Pif1

Efficient and faithful replication of the genome is essential to maintain genome stability. Replication is carried out by a multiprotein complex called the replisome, which encounters numerous obstacles to its progression. Failure to bypass these obstacles results in genome instability and may facilitate errors leading to disease. Cells use accessory helicases that help the replisome bypass difficult barriers. All eukaryotes contain the accessory helicase Pif1, which tracks in a 5′–3′ direction on single-stranded DNA and plays a role in genome maintenance processes. Here, we reveal a previously unknown role for Pif1 in replication barrier bypass. We use an in vitro reconstituted Saccharomyces cerevisiae replisome to demonstrate that Pif1 enables the replisome to bypass an inactive (i.e., dead) Cas9 (dCas9) R-loop barrier. Interestingly, dCas9 R-loops targeted to either strand are bypassed with similar efficiency. Furthermore, we employed a single-molecule fluorescence visualization technique to show that Pif1 facilitates this bypass by enabling the simultaneous removal of the dCas9 protein and the R-loop. We propose that Pif1 is a general displacement helicase for replication bypass of both R-loops and protein blocks.

Efficient and faithful replication of the genome is essential to maintain genome stability and is carried out by a multiprotein complex called the replisome (1–4). There are numerous obstacles to progression of the replisome during the process of chromosome duplication. These obstacles include RNA-DNA hybrids (R-loops), DNA secondary structures, transcribing RNA polymerases, and other tightly bound proteins (5–9). Failure to bypass these barriers may result in genome instability, which can lead to cellular abnormalities and genetic disease. Cells contain various accessory helicases that help the replisome bypass these difficult barriers (10–20). A subset of these helicases act on the opposite strand of the replicative helicase (1, 2, 14, 19).All eukaryotes contain an accessory helicase, Pif1, which tracks in a 5′–3′ direction on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) (11–16). Pif1 is important in pathways such as Okazaki-fragment processing and break-induced repair that require the removal of DNA-binding proteins as well as potential displacement of R-loops (11–13, 21, 15–18, 22–25). Genetic studies and immunoprecipitation pull-down assays indicate that Pif1 interacts with PCNA (the DNA sliding clamp), Pol ε (the leading-strand polymerase), the MCMs (the motor subunits of the replicative helicase CMG), and RPA (the single-stranded DNA-binding protein) (15, 26, 27). Pif1 activity in break-induced repair strongly depends on its interaction with PCNA (26). These interactions with replisomal components suggest that Pif1 could interact with the replisome during replication. In Escherichia coli, the replicative helicase is the DnaB homohexamer that encircles the lagging strand and moves in a 5′–3′ direction (20). E. coli accessory helicases include the monomeric UvrD (helicase II) and Rep, which move in the 3′–5′ direction and operate on the opposite strand from the DnaB hexamer. It is known that these monomeric helicases promote the bypass of barriers during replication such as stalled RNA polymerases (5). The eukaryotic replicative helicase is the 11-subunit CMG (Cdc45, Mcm2–7, GINS) and tracks in the 3′–5′ direction, opposite to the direction of Pif1 (25, 28). Once activated by Mcm10, the MCM motor domains of CMG encircle the leading strand (29–32). We hypothesized that, similar to UvrD and Rep in E. coli, Pif1 interacts with the replisome tracking in the opposite direction to enable bypass of replication obstacles.In this report, we use an in vitro reconstituted Saccharomyces cerevisiae replisome to study the role of Pif1 in bypass of a “dead” Cas9 (dCas9), which is a Cas9 protein that is deactivated in DNA cleavage but otherwise fully functional in DNA binding. As with Cas9, dCas9 is a single-turnover enzyme that can be programmed with a guide RNA (gRNA) to target either strand. The dCas9–gRNA complex forms a roadblock consisting of an R-loop and a tightly bound protein (dCas9), a construct that is similar to a stalled RNA polymerase. This roadblock (hereafter dCas9 R-loop) arrests replisomes independent of whether the dCas9 R-loop is targeted to the leading or lagging strand (30). Besides its utility due to its programmable nature (33), the use of the dCas9 R-loop allows us to answer several mechanistic questions. For example, the ability to program the dCas9 R-loop block to any specific sequence enables us to observe whether block removal is different depending on whether the block is on the leading or lagging strand. Furthermore, the inner diameter of CMG can accommodate double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and possibly an R-loop, but not a dCas9 protein. Using the dCas9 R-loop block allows us to determine the fate of each of its components.Here, we report that Pif1 enables the bypass of the dCas9 R-loop by the replisome. Interestingly, dCas9 R-loops targeted to either the leading or lagging strand are bypassed with similar efficiency. In addition, the PCNA clamp is not required for bypass of the block, indicating that Pif1 does not need to interact with PCNA during bypass of the block. We used a single-molecule fluorescence imaging to show that both the dCas9 and the R-loop are displaced as an intact nucleoprotein complex. We propose that Pif1 is a general displacement helicase for replication bypass of both R-loops and protein blocks.     

Defining principles that influence antimicrobial peptide activity against capsulated Klebsiella pneumoniae

The extracellular polysaccharide capsule of Klebsiella pneumoniae resists penetration by antimicrobials and protects the bacteria from the innate immune system. Host antimicrobial peptides are inactivated by the capsule as it impedes their penetration to the bacterial membrane. While the capsule sequesters most peptides, a few antimicrobial peptides have been identified that retain activity against encapsulated K. pneumoniae, suggesting that this bacterial defense can be overcome. However, it is unclear what factors allow peptides to avoid capsule inhibition. To address this, we created a peptide analog with strong antimicrobial activity toward several K. pneumoniae strains from a previously inactive peptide. We characterized the effects of these two peptides on K. pneumoniae, along with their physical interactions with K. pneumoniae capsule. Both peptides disrupted bacterial cell membranes, but only the active peptide displayed this activity against capsulated K. pneumoniae. Unexpectedly, the active peptide showed no decrease in capsule binding, but did lose secondary structure in a capsule-dependent fashion compared with the inactive parent peptide. We found that these characteristics are associated with capsule-peptide aggregation, leading to disruption of the K. pneumoniae capsule. Our findings reveal a potential mechanism for disrupting the protective barrier that K. pneumoniae uses to avoid the immune system and last-resort antibiotics.

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections have become a major threat to human health (1–3). Mortality rates from infections caused by gram-negative bacteria, specifically Klebsiella pneumoniae, are on the rise owing to the lack of effective antibiotics to treat the emergent MDR strains (4–7). The capsule of K. pneumoniae is composed of extracellular polysaccharides that promote infection by masking the bacteria from immune recognition and provide an especially potent barrier against peptide-based antimicrobials, including innate host defense peptides and last-resort polymyxin antibiotics (8–14).Antimicrobial peptides are commonly amphipathic, with both a charged and a hydrophobic character (15). The anionic nature of the bacterial capsule promotes an electrostatic attraction to cationic antimicrobial peptides, and peptide hydrophobicity has been proposed to enhance capsule binding through nonionic interactions (9, 12, 16). Interaction with the bacterial capsule is thought to induce structural changes that cause sequestration of antimicrobial peptides to prevent them from reaching their bacterial membrane target (16, 17). While the bacterial capsule inhibits host defense peptides and polymyxins, a few amphipathic antimicrobial peptides have been identified that can retain activity against capsulated K. pneumoniae (18–21). However, it is not known what enables some peptides to avoid sequestration by the capsule of K. pneumoniae while the capsule effectively neutralizes our innate host defense peptides with similar physicochemical properties. This lack of knowledge prevents us from understanding how to bypass the capsule barrier that K. pneumoniae uses to avoid our innate immune response and last-resort treatment options.Here we characterize the synthetic evolution of a peptide inhibited by capsule to a peptide with potent activity against capsulated K. pneumoniae. Remarkably, our results indicate that rather than reduced interactions, our active peptide retains binding to capsule and undergoes conformational changes associated with capsule aggregation. We present a model in which peptide-driven sequestration of capsule disrupts this barrier and reduces its ability to protect K. pneumoniae against antimicrobial attack. These findings provide insight into improving antimicrobial peptide activity against K. pneumoniae and may help strengthen our understanding of the inability of innate host defense peptides to act on capsulated bacteria.     

Directed information exchange between cortical layers in macaque V1 and V4 and its modulation by selective attention

Achieving behavioral goals requires integration of sensory and cognitive information across cortical laminae and cortical regions. How this computation is performed remains unknown. Using local field potential recordings and spectrally resolved conditional Granger causality (cGC) analysis, we mapped visual information flow, and its attentional modulation, between cortical layers within and between macaque brain areas V1 and V4. Stimulus-induced interlaminar information flow within V1 dominated upwardly, channeling information toward supragranular corticocortical output layers. Within V4, information flow dominated from granular to supragranular layers, but interactions between supragranular and infragranular layers dominated downwardly. Low-frequency across-area communication was stronger from V4 to V1, with little layer specificity. Gamma-band communication was stronger in the feedforward V1-to-V4 direction. Attention to the receptive field of V1 decreased communication between all V1 layers, except for granular-to-supragranular layer interactions. Communication within V4, and from V1 to V4, increased with attention across all frequencies. While communication from V4 to V1 was stronger in lower-frequency bands (4 to 25 Hz), attention modulated cGCs from V4 to V1 across all investigated frequencies. Our data show that top-down cognitive processes result in reduced communication within cortical areas, increased feedforward communication across all frequency bands, and increased gamma-band feedback communication.

Goal-directed behavior requires the brain to integrate sensory information with cognitive variables. In neocortical areas, sensory information is conveyed by feedforward connections, while feedback connections convey information about cognitive states and goals. Feedforward and feedback connections rely on separate anatomical pathways and have been proposed to map onto distinct frequency bands of neural population activity (1–7). It is, however, unknown whether these signals differ across laminae, or how they are communicated between laminae within and between cortical areas.Feedforward connections predominantly terminate in layer IV of sensory cortical areas. This information is passed on to layers II/III and further to layers V/VI, where recurrent inputs to layer II/III arise (8–11). Cognitive variables affect sensory processing through feedback connections, which predominantly terminate in layer I and V (12), but this termination pattern varies depending on hierarchical distances between areas (13). Feedforward and feedback signals have been proposed to show separate local field potential (LFP) spectral signatures. Feedforward signals have been associated with low-frequency theta- (1, 7) and gamma-band activity, originating and dominating in supragranular layers (1–7). Feedback signals have been associated with lower-frequency (alpha, beta) band activity, prominent in infragranular layers across the cortical hierarchy (1–4, 7, 14), although attention-related feedback signals in the gamma-frequency band between frontal eye field (FEF) and V4 have been reported (15). Alpha-related feedback has been linked to active inhibition (16, 17), suggesting that feedback signals, induced by attention to receptive field (RF) locations, should result in reduced alpha power. This occurs in infragranular layers in visual areas (18), but can also be less layer-specific (2). It is thus questionable whether feedback information is transmitted by alpha frequencies because attention, employing feedback, shunts alpha oscillations. In extrastriate sensory areas, attention increases LFP power in the gamma-frequency band (14, 15, 19–21), while, in primary visual cortex, attention can increase or decrease LFP power in the gamma-frequency band (1, 14, 21). Many of the above results were obtained by methods which do not provide insight into how these signals differ between laminae within an area, or between laminae across different areas. Thus, it remains unclear whether layer differences in these signals between cortical areas exist, and whether they are differently affected by cognitive goals.To understand how information within and between areas is conveyed as a function of cognitive task, we performed simultaneous laminar recordings in areas V1 and V4 using 16-contact laminar probes while macaque monkeys performed a feature-based spatial attention task (22). We quantified communication between laminae and areas by measuring Granger causality (GC) using locally referenced LFP signals.