Brace effect in scoliosis in the sagittal plane - an MRI study

AIM: Using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging we studied the brace effect in scoliosis in the sagittal plane. METHOD: In 38 patients with idiopathic scoliosis (mean age 13.4 years) MR total spine imaging was carried out to investigate the immediate effect of bracing in the sagittal plane. There were 19 thoracic, 13 S-shaped and 6 lumbar scoliosis. On conventional radiographs the mean Cobb angle of the thoracic curves was 31 degrees and of the lumbar curves 26 degrees. MR imaging was performed in the supine position with and without the brace in direct sequence. On the sagittal MR projection the Cobb angle was measured between T 4 and T 12 and between T 12 and L 5. RESULTS: On the coronal MR images the mean correction with brace was 23 % of the thoracic curves and 29 % of the lumbar curves. The mean, sagittal Cobb angle (T 4 - T 12) was 14 degrees without brace and 12 degrees with brace. For the lumbar curves the mean sagittal Cobb angle (T 12 - L 5) was 32 degrees without brace and 31 degrees with brace. In the paired t-test these differences were significant. CONCLUSION: Using MR total spine imaging the brace effect in scoliosis could be depicted in the sagittal plane. In the thoracic spine a correction of the lordotic deformity could not be observed.     

Effect of the Boston thoracic brace on the frontal and sagittal curves of the spine

The purpose of the present study was to compare the sagittal and lateral curves in progressive idiopathic scoliosis treated conservatively with the Boston thoracic brace. The importance of the delordosation was confirmed. The correlation was, however, seen only between correction of the lumbar lordosis and correction of the lumbar scoliosis. The correction of the proximal thoracic scoliosis with the brace was equally good, without a similar correlation between correction of the proximal scoliosis and correction of the sagittal curves being observed. A coupling between the correction of the two scolioses may therefore be suspected. Further, the correcting forces of the Boston thoracic brace seemed to be approximately the same independent of the range of the scoliosis, at least between 10 degrees and 40 degrees.     

Selective ventral derotation spondylodesis in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis: a prospective study

AIM: Radiometric curve analysis of instrumented primary and spontaneous secondary curve correction after anterior correction and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. METHOD: Sixty-four patients with idiopathic thoracic scoliosis were prospectively evaluated. All patients were operated either with the Zielke-VDS or with a primary stable double rod instrumentation with selective fusion of the thoracic curve from end-to end-vertebra. Follow-up averaged 29 months (24 - 52 months). RESULTS: The Cobb angle of the primary curve averaged 63.2 degrees preoperatively and was corrected to 21.4 degrees postoperatively with an average loss of correction of 5.3 degrees (58 % final curve correction). Apical thoracic vertebral rotation was corrected by 48 %. The secondary lumbar curve measured 38.2 degrees preoperatively (72 % correction on the bending films) and was spontaneously corrected by 57 % to 16.4 degrees without significant loss of correction in the final follow-up. Apical vertebral rotation averaged 11.3 degrees in the lumbar curve and was corrected spontaneously by 24 % to 8.6 degrees without significant loss of correction. Lumbar apex vertebra deviation showed no significant reduction. There was no case of lumbar curve decompensation in either frontal or sagittal plane. Implant related complications were observed in 7 patients (rod breakage), but no pseudarthrosis occurred. There were no neurological complications noted. CONCLUSION: Selective anterior correction and fusion in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis enables a satisfactory correction of both primary and lumbar secondary curves. The advantage of selective anterior correction and fusion of thoracic scoliosis is the short fusion length, better derotation and satisfactory correction of the secondary lumbar curve. The disadvantages of single threaded rod techniques in terms of lack of primary stability and a kyphogenic effect have been eliminated by the development of a primary stable, small size double rod instrumentation.     

Changes in curve pattern after brace treatment for idiopathic scoliosis

We studied whether thoracic Boston brace treatment changes the King type of scoliotic curves in a group of 50 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Bending radiographs showed more flexibility of the lumbar curves than that of the thoracic curves. However, after initial application of the brace, the mean lumbar correction in degrees was less than the mean thoracic correction. After brace treatment we found a slight statistically significant increase in the mean lumbar curve, but no significant change in the mean thoracic curve. In 7 of our patients, we found a change in the King classification which seemed to be related to insufficient lumbar correction at the start of brace treatment. When classifying idiopathic scoliosis, one should bear in mind that the result may be temporary because scoliosis is a dynamic process. A change in curve type can occur during brace treatment.     

Nighttime bracing with the Providence brace in adolescent girls with idiopathic scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study was conducted of 102 consecutive female patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Those patients with Risser 0, 1, and 2 met the criteria for inclusion and were treated only with the Providence brace. OBJECTIVES: To report the authors' experience with a hypercorrective nighttime brace and to evaluate the results with respect to risk factors for progression. Second, the study compares results with expectations from the natural history as reported by others. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Compliance with full-time brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has been a problem. Since the introduction of the Milwaukee brace, alternatives such as low-profile braces, reduced wearing schedules, and nighttime only bracing have been tried. However, many factors influence the success or failure besides compliance. These include in-brace correction, brace design, and the orthotist's skills. This is the first report of the results of treatment with a new nighttime brace that is made with CAD/CAM technology that can achieve higher initial in-brace corrections than other reported methods. METHODS: Results were analyzed with respect to curve size, curve pattern, maturity, and level of the primary curve apex. Both compliant and noncompliant patients were included in the analysis. A univariate analysis was done on those factors thought to influence success with bracing using the Pearson chi2 test. RESULTS: The average initial in-brace correction with a supine radiograph was 96% for major curves and 98% for minor curves. Seventy-five patients (74%) did not progress >5 degrees and 27 patients (26%) progressed > or =6 degrees or went on to surgery. Twenty-nine percent of Risser 0 or 1 patients progressed and 17% of patients Risser 2 progressed. The risk of progression anticipated by natural history data, which included all curve patterns, was 68% for Risser 0 and 1 and 23% for Risser 2. Risser 3 and 4 patients were excluded from the study. Seventy-six percent of patients with curve apexes between T8 and L1 had successful outcomes using the Providence brace. This is compared with a 74% success rate in the prospective Scoliosis Research Society study of patients wearing a thoraco lumbar sacral orthosis for 16 hours per day with curve apexes between T8 and L1. With the Providence brace, 63% of thoracic curves and 65% of double curves were successful. Ninety-four percent of lumbar curves and 93% of thoracolumbar curves were successful. CONCLUSION: Excellent initial in-brace correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was observed with this computer-designed and manufactured recumbent brace. Patients with high apex curves cephalad to T8 (n = 31) had a success rate of 61% compared with a success rate of 79% (n = 71) if the apex was at or below T9. Compared with previous natural history and the prospective study data, the Providence brace is effective in preventing progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis for curves <35 degrees. It was effective for larger curves with a low apex. The authors' experience with patients with curves >35 degrees (n = 8) is too small to validate its effectiveness for larger curves with a higher apex.     

Changes in curve pattern after brace treatment for idiopathic scoliosis

We studied whether thoracic Boston brace treatment changes the King type of scoliotic curves in a group of 50 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Bending radiographs showed more flexibility of the lumbar curves than that of the thoracic curves. However, after initial application of the brace, the mean lumbar correction in degrees was less than the mean thoracic correction. After brace treatment we found a slight statistically significant increase in the mean lumbar curve, but no significant change in the mean thoracic curve. In 7 of our patients, we found a change in the King classification which seemed to be related to insufficient lumbar correction at the start of brace treatment. When classifying idiopathic scoliosis, one should bear in mind that the result may be temporary because scoliosis is a dynamic process. A change in curve type can occur during brace treatment.     

Three-year results of bracing in scoliosis

We treated 107 patients with idiopathic scoliosis with the Boston brace. The primary correction was good in all the curve patterns. The follow-up time after weaning averaged 3 years. The best final result was achieved in thoracic and lumbar curves (mean 2 degrees). The final correction was worse in patients with an initial curve less than 30 degrees when compared with the patients with larger curves. Except the double major curves, there was a positive correlation between the primary correction, duration of the treatment, and the final result. The results in 14 patients with bracing for 12 hours daily did not differ from the remainder. Progression of the initial curve more than 5 degrees after the treatment was noted in 24 patients. Three patients were operated on later because of progression. We conclude that bracing can prevent progress of scoliosis.     

Anterior surgery with short fusion using the Zielke procedure for thoracic scoliosis: focus on the correction of compensatory curves

Anterior instrumentation is recommended to correct idiopathic thoracolumbar or lumbar scoliosis through short fusion within the major curve. Only a few reports exist of anterior surgical correction for thoracic scoliosis. This study assessed the results of Zielke instrumentation for thoracic curve and analyzed the three-dimensional correction of deformity, especially correction of the uninstrumented compensatory curve. Seventeen patients, who had undergone selective thoracic correction and fusion using the Zielke procedure to treat thoracic scoliosis, had been followed for at least 3 years. Three-dimensional correction was evaluated radiographically. Furthermore, three-dimensional back deformities were evaluated using a topographic body scanner. Twelve patients with a single thoracic curve and five with a double curve were all female, with a mean age of 14.6 years. The preoperative main thoracic curve was 54.8 degrees +/- 10.5 degrees (range, 40-78 degrees), and it was 23.8 degrees +/- 10.5 degrees (range, 7-40 degrees) at the final follow-up examination (p < 0.0001). The average correction rate of the main curves was 56.6%. By correcting the thoracic curve, the upper and lower compensatory curves were corrected spontaneously without surgical instrumentation, with average correction rates of 45.1% and 50.2%, respectively. The average correction loss of the main curve was 2.3 degrees. The hump angle measured using a topographic body scanner decreased from 12.8 degrees +/- 4.5 degrees to 8.4 degrees +/- 4.3 degrees after surgery (p = 0.0001). Of the three patients in whom the rod broke up, only one showed a correction loss of 10 degrees; however, bony fusion was obtained. Anterior short fusion for thoracic scoliosis appears to offer significant correction, stabilization, and spontaneous correction of the compensatory lumbar curve without limiting lumbar motion.     

Kriterien zur Behandlung idiopathischer Skoliosen zwischen 40 ° und 50 °

The treatment of idiopathic scoliosis over 40 degrees (Cobb) during the growth period is under discussion concerning the indication for conservative or surgical treatment. Curve progression depends on the degree of the frontal and sagittal deformity, vertebral rotation, rigidity of the curve, the skeletal age, the age and sex of the patient, the familial frequency of scoliosis and the location of the curve. In scoliosis over 40 degrees progression is fast and the possibilities for successful conservative brace treatment are reduced during the growth period. Progression occurs more frequently in thoracic and double major scolioses, especially in young patients (Risser sign 0 and 1). Predictive factors of a successful brace treatment are the correction of scoliosis and rotation; deterioration of both during the brace treatment leads to poor results. Evaluating the flexibility of the sagittal profile is important, as is primary correction of 30-50% in the brace during the 3 months. Operative correction of small primary curves reduces the fusion length, operation time, and blood loss and is followed by a reduction in loading on the adjacent vertebral segments in comparison to the long fusions necessary in more structural and double major scolioses. So far it is not possible to make an equivalent judgment of the frequency of the "crankshaft" phenomenon and the treatment necessary in young patients (Rissersign 0 and 1) treated by dorsal instrumentation alone, but temporary brace treatment may be considered in those cases.     

Surgical therapy of hemivertebrae scoliosis and kyphosis--a retrospective analysis of 53 cases

AIM OF THE STUDY: We performed a retrospective analysis of the results of operative treatment of 53 patients with congenital scoliosis (n = 47) or kyphosis (n = 6) due to hemivertebrae. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The mean age of the patients (31 girls and 22 boys) at the time of the initial examination was 6 +/- 4 years. Surgical treatment was carried out on average at the age of 9 +/- 5 years. Follow-up examinations were carried out up to a mean age of 16 +/- 6 years. RESULTS: The results of operative treatment depended on the localization of the hemivertebrae and the surgical technique. Progression of scoliosis due to a thoracic hemivertebra was halted, but the scoliosis could not be corrected (Cobb angle at initial examination 37 +/- 17 degrees at follow-up 34 +/- 23 degrees). Scoliosis due to lumbar hemivertebrae was reduced by surgery (Cobb angle at initial examination 36 +/- 14 degrees, at follow-up 21 +/- 15 degrees). Surgery without instrumentation led to worse results than did surgery with instrumentation with thoracic as well as lumbar scoliosis. Combined dorsoventral procedures with resection of the hemivertebra seemed to be superior to spondylodesis without resection of the hemivertebra. Surgical correction of kyphosis associated with dorsal hemivertebrae was performed by means of dorsal or dorsoventral spondylodesis with hemivertebra resection (preoperative kyphosis 70 +/- 34 degrees, at follow-up 44 +/- 25 degrees). CONCLUSION: Spondylodesis without instrumentation is associated with an unsure prognosis with respect to effects on the progression of the scoliosis, even if it is performed on very young patients. In contrast, spondylodesis with instrumentation can achieve better and longer-lasting corrections of scoliosis even with larger initial curvatures. Scoliosis due to lumbar hemivertebrae is more amenable to surgical correction than thoracic scoliosis due to hemivertebrae.     

Effectiveness of the boston brace in treatment of large curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective study of 50 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with curves measuring 35 degrees to 45 degrees who were treated with a Boston brace. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Boston brace could effectively halt long-term progression in skeletally immature adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis who had a curve between 35 degrees and 45 degrees. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Boston brace has been shown to be effective in preventing curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, but its efficacy in large curves has not been fully studied. METHODS: Fifty adolescents were treated with a Boston brace for idiopathic scoliosis curves of 35-45 degrees (mean, 38.55 degrees ). All were judged to be skeletally immature based on menarcheal status (mean, 2.6 months before menarche), Risser sign (mean, 0.90; range, 0-2), and chronologic age (mean, 13 +/- 1 years). Patients were recalled for long-term follow-up at a mean of 9.7 years (range, 6.23-13.22 years) after brace discontinuation. Three well-matched patient subsets were then identified based on compliance. Group 1 (n = 24) consisted of patients who were compliant with the brace program and wore the brace 18 or more hours per day, Group 2 (n = 14) contained patients who wore the brace 12-18 hours per day, and Group 3 (n = 12) contained patients who wore the brace 0-12 hours per day. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the amount of initial correction seen in the brace between the groups: 49%, 45%, and 33% curve correction in the brace for Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < 0.05). At long-term follow-up there was a statistically significant difference between Groups 1, 2, and 3 in the percentage of patients in whom the curve had progressed to more than 45 degrees (P < 0.001), who had more than 5 degrees of curve progression (P < 0. 05), or who had undergone posterior spinal fusion (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These long-term data confirm that the Boston brace when used 18 or more hours per day is effective in preventing progression of large curves at a mean of 9.8 years after bracing is discontinued.     

Application of a lumbar brace for thoracic and double thoracic lumbar scoliosis: a comparative study

A pilot study was performed to determine if thoracic and double thoracic lumbar scolioses can successfully be treated by applying a lumbar brace. In some of the patients application of a thoracic brace yielded insufficient correction of the lumbar curve. As the response of a curve to application of a brace is said to be the best guideline for prediction of the results of brace treatment, it was thought important to focus more attention on the behaviour of the lumbar curve. It was assumed that a lumbar brace would result in a better fit and might lead to better correction of the lumbar curve. In total 21 patients were treated according to the above-described method. Three patients were omitted from the study because of incomplete radiographic data. Thus, 18 patients treated with a thoracic brace, who showed insufficient correction of the lumbar curve, were subsequently treated with a lumbar brace. Radiographs taken in the thoracic brace patients showed a mean decrease of the thoracic curve of 9 degrees (27%) and a mean decrease of the lumbar curve of 5 degrees (16%). In the lumbar brace group the mean decrease of the thoracic curve was 7 degrees (21%) and the mean decrease of the lumbar curve was 12 degrees (38%). Brace treatment was successful (<6 degrees progression of the major curve) in 13 patients (70%). In this selection of patients with thoracic and double thoracic lumbar scoliosis a lumbar brace clearly led to a better initial correction of the lumbar curve; follow-up results seem to be comparable to those in literature.     

Brace treatment in neuromuscular spine deformity.

We reviewed 90 consecutive patients with various neuromuscular diseases and a progressive spine deformity treated with a prefabricated Boston-type underarm corrective brace. Of these, 38 patients had spastic tetraplegia; seven, syndrome-related muscular hypertonia; 24, muscular hypotonia; and 21, myelomeningocele. The mean age at the treatment start was 9.2 years (range, 1.4-17.7 years). Twenty-four were ambulating and 66 wheelchair-bound. Hypotonia was the dominant type of muscle involvement in 49, spasticity in 28, and athetosis in 13 patients. The mean pretreatment Cobb angle was 47 degrees, with a range from 23 to 95 degrees. The mean brace-induced Cobb-angle correction was 60%, thus well comparable to that in idiopathic scoliosis. However, this did not predict favorable treatment results. At the follow-up, on average 3.1 years (range, 1-5.5 years) after weaning from the brace, the brace treatment was successful in 23 patients. Successful was defined as <10 degrees curve progression during the observation time and a good brace compliance. Forty-one patients discontinued the brace treatment, and 19 progressed despite adequate brace wear. Five patients are still in treatment, and two have died. Successful treatment was seen in ambulating patients with muscle hypotonia and short thoracolumbar/lumbar curves measuring <40 degrees as well as in nonambulating patients with spastic short lumbar curves. These types of neuromuscular scoliosis may be the only ones to respond to brace treatment. In other cases, the brace treatment cannot be expected to have a lasting corrective effect although it can be used as sitting support.     

Effect of the Boston thoracic brace on the frontal and sagittal curves of the spine

The purpose of the present study was to compare the sagittal and lateral curves in progressive idiopathic scoliosis treated conservatively with the Boston thoracic brace. The importance of the delordosation was confirmed. The correlation was, however, seen only between correction of the lumbar lordosis and correction of the lumbar scoliosis. The correction of the proximal thoracic scoliosis with the brace was equally good, without a similar correlation between correction of the proximal scoliosis and correction of the sagittal curves being observed.

A coupling between the correction of the two scolioses may therefore be suspected. Further, the correcting forces of the Boston thoracic brace seemed to be approximately the same, independent of the range of the scoliosis, at least between 10° and 40°.     

Anterior instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Thirty-two patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis underwent anterior fusion with rigid single rod (third generation instrumentation) and titanium mesh cages. The mean follow-up was 31 (24-45) months and the mean age was 14.9 years. There were 8 patients with King type I, 10 with type II, 6 with type III, 4 with type IV and 4 with lumbar curves. Titanium mesh cages were used in all the lumbar procedures and at the cranial and caudal ends of the instrumented area in thoracic cases. All the patients were immobilized in an orthosis for 3-6 months postoperatively. Mean preoperative primary coronal Cobb angle of 56 degrees was improved to 8.6 degrees. Average correction rate was 84%. Sagittal balance was restored with a mean thoracic kyphosis of 28 degrees and a mean lumbar lordosis of 38 degrees. Spontaneous secondary curve decompensation did not occur and postoperative thoracolumbar junctional kyphosis was not seen. One case had to be revised due to proximal screw pull out and loss of correction.     

No relationship exists between the correction of the thoracic and the lumbar curves after selective thoracic fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis King type II

In this study we focus on idiopathic scoliosis with a primary thoracic curve and a secondary lumbar curve. We were interested in how the lumbar curve corrects following selective thoracic fusion and whether one can explain or predict the behaviour of the lumbar curve. In the literature it is said that, if the lower level of fusion is properly selected, the lumbar curve spontaneously corrects to balance the thoracic curve after selective thoracic fusion. Most authors have assumed a mechanism whereby improvement of the lumbar curve occurs through counterbalancing the surgical correction of the thoracic curve. The correction of the lumbar curve is said to echo the correction obtained for the thoracic curve. Because of these hypotheses, we postulate there should be a correlation between the correction of the lumbar and the thoracic curves of a scoliosis. To validate this hypothesis, we performed a retrospective study on 27 patients with King type II adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by selective thoracic fusion. The mean preoperative Cobb angles were 54 degrees for the thoracic curve and 34 degrees for the lumbar curve. Postoperatively they were 31 degrees and 22 degrees respectively. Using Pearson correlation analysis, we found no significant correlation between the relative corrections of the individual thoracic and lumbar curves. Moreover, there was a decrease in the correlation between the thoracic and lumbar curve after operation (preoperative R=0.787, postoperative R=0.364). These results show that the correction of the lumbar curve is not a reflection of the thoracic correction. The exact mechanism by which the lumbar spine corrects remains to be elucidated.     

Nighttime bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the Charleston bending brace. Preliminary report

The authors report their preliminary experience with the Charleston bending brace for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. This brace holds the patient in the position of maximum side bend correction and is worn only at night. Patients in this prospective multicentered study met all the following criteria: skeletal immaturity (Risser 0, 1+, or 2+), curvature greater than 25 degrees before bracing, no prior treatment, and greater than 1-year follow-up since initiation of treatment. There were 191 structural curves in the 139 patients. One hundred fifteen patients (83%) showed improvement or less than 5 degree change in curvature. Twenty-four patients (17%) demonstrated an increase in curvature greater than 5 degrees. Based on these preliminary results, continued use of bending brace treatment at nighttime only is justified for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Patients with double curves should be observed closely for increase in compensatory curves.     

Results of brace treatment of scoliosis in Marfan syndrome

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a defined Marfan population with traditional indications for bracing. OBJECTIVES: To determine the success rate of brace treatment in keeping curves from progressing by more than 5 degrees or exceeding 45 degrees. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies exist regarding brace treatment of Marfan syndrome, and they include many patients with curves of more than 45 degrees, as well as some who are near maturity. All of the prior studies risk the possibility of some selection bias. METHODS: Patients were selected from support groups and several institutions. Inclusion criteria were: Definite diagnosis of Marfan syndrome, curve of 45 degrees or less, Risser sign 2, 1, or 0 at inception of bracing, recommended wear of 18 hours or more per day, and follow-up until maturity or surgery (minimum, 2 years). Success was defined as curve progression of 5 degrees or less and final curve remaining 45 degrees or less. Failure was a final curve of more than 45 degrees. Twenty-four patients met the criteria. There were 15 girls and 9 boys. Twenty-two patients wore a brace as recommended. Two additional patients were unable to tolerate it. RESULTS: Mean age at inception of bracing was 8.7 years (range, 4-12 years). There were 14 double major, 6 thoracic, and 4 thoracolumbar curves with a mean size of 29 degrees at the beginning of bracing. The stated wearing time averaged 21 hours per day. Five patients had significant pain over bony prominences. Although correction of the curve in brace was good (45%), only 4 of the patients had success, and in 20 of the 24 treatment was considered a failure. Mean progression was 6 degrees +/- 8 degrees per year, for a final mean curve of 49 degrees. Sixteen of the patients had, or were advised to have, surgical correction. The difference in age and degree of curvature were not statistically significant between the success and nonsuccess groups. CONCLUSIONS: The success rate for brace treatment of Marfan scoliosis is 17%, which is lower than that reported for idiopathic scoliosis. Possible reasons include increased progressive forces, altered transmission of corrective pressure to the spine, and younger age at inception of bracing. Because there was no control group, it is unknown whether bracing slowed curve progression. Physicians should understand that most patients with Marfan syndrome who have a curve of more than 25 degrees and a Risser sign of 2 or less will reach the surgical range, even with brace treatment.     

Biological factors and predictability of bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Biological factors that could have a predictive value in treating idiopathic scoliosis by brace were studied in 107 patients (102 girls and 5 boys). The mean age of the patients was 14 years 6 months, and the mean Cobb angle of the curves was 36 degrees at start of treatment. The Boston brace was used for an average of 1 year 6 months, and mean follow-up time after weaning was 3 years. Scoliosis with an apex of Th 10-12 proved to be the most favorable for the final result, with a mean correction of 2 degrees. All other curves remained unchanged. Patients who had a period of rapid growth just before or during treatment had a better final result than the others. The final result was also better when treatment was started before menarche.     

The flexible Triac-Brace for conservative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. An alternative treatment option?

The flexible Triac-Brace was developed to improve cosmetic appearance and wearing comfort. It was evaluated in this study with respect to primary curve correction in idiopathic scoliosis (IS). Twenty patients (15 girls, 5 boys, mean age: 12.5) with a diagnosis of IS were treated with the Triac-Brace. Lumbar curves showed an initial average Cobb angle of 26 degrees (SD = 9 degrees), thoracic curves of 25 degrees (SD = 7 degrees). After 6.2 weeks the primary curve correction was measured (Cobb). Further radiological follow-up was done every 6 months during the average wearing time of 15 months. Cosmesis and wearing comfort were assessed by a valid scoring system (Quality of Life Profile for Spine Deformities). We observed a primary correction of 41% in lumbar curves (n = 12) (significant, t-test), and 10% in thoracic curves (n = 17) (not significant, t-test). An increase in correction over time as reported by Veldhuizen et al was not seen. Curve progression was noted in five patients (average 12 degrees). The scores for cosmesis (4.2/5) and flexibility of the back (4.6/5) were high. Ninety percent of the patients reported a wearing time of 22-23 h. We do not recommend treatment of thoracic or double curves with the Triac-Brace. Larger studies are necessary to assess the effectiveness in lumbar curves. The improved wearing comfort is a potential advantage.