Influence of taranabant, an orally active, highly selective, potent cannabinoid-1 receptor (CB1R) inverse agonist, on ethinyl estradiol and norelgestromin plasma pharmacokinetics

Taranabant, an orally active, potent, and highly selective CB-1 receptor inverse agonist, is being developed for the treatment of obesity. This randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, crossover study evaluated the effect of taranabant on the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol and norelgestromin in healthy women receiving > or =3 months of therapy with oral contraceptives. Nineteen participants with normal menstrual cycles received oral contraceptives on days 1 to 21 during 2 consecutive contraceptive cycles. Participants received taranabant 6 mg/day or placebo on days 1 to 21 of each contraceptive cycle. Plasma samples were collected predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours postdose on day 21 of each cycle for determination of AUC0-24 h and Cmax of ethinyl estradiol and norelgestromin. Lack of a clinically important effect was declared if the 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratio of AUC0-24 h and Cmax in the absence and presence of taranabant were contained within the predefined bounds of (0.8, 1.25). The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of ethinyl estradiol and norelgestromin, respectively, were 0.93 (0.87, 1.00) and 1.02 (0.96, 1.09) for AUC0-24 h and 0.95 (0.88, 1.01) and 0.95 (0.88, 1.01) for Cmax. In summary, coadministration of multiple-dose taranabant 6 mg with oral contraceptives did not lead to clinically meaningful alterations in the pharmacokinetic profiles of ethinyl estradiol or norelgestromin.     

The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic consequences of the co-administration of lamotrigine and a combined oral contraceptive in healthy female subjects

AIMS: To assess the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of co-administration of a combined oral contraceptive (ethinyloestradiol plus levonorgestrel) and lamotrigine. METHODS: Over a period of 130 days, healthy female subjects took lamotrigine (titrated up to 300 mg day(-1)) and the combined oral contraceptive, either individually or as co-therapy. Plasma ethinyloestradiol and levonorgestrel concentrations were measured in the presence and absence of lamotrigine, and serum lamotrigine concentrations were measured in the presence and absence of the combined oral contraceptive. Serum concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), progesterone, oestradiol and sex hormone binding globulin were also determined. RESULTS: Of the 22 enrolled subjects, 16 had evaluable pharmacokinetic data. The mean (90% CI) ratios of lamotrigine area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0,24 h)) and maximum observed concentration (C(max)) of lamotrigine when it was given with the combined oral contraceptive and during monotherapy were 0.48 (0.44, 0.53) and 0.61 (0.57, 0.66), respectively. Ethinyloestradiol pharmacokinetics were unchanged by lamotrigine, the mean combined oral contraceptive + lamotrigine : combined oral contraceptive alone ratios (90% CI) of the AUC(0,24 h) and C(max) of levonorgestrel were 0.81 (0.76, 0.86) and 0.88 (0.82, 0.93), respectively. FSH and LH concentrations were increased (by 4.7-fold and 3.4-fold, respectively) in the presence of lamotrigine, but the low serum progesterone concentrations suggested that suppression of ovulation was maintained. Intermenstrual bleeding was reported by 7/22 (32%) of subjects during co-administration of lamotrigine and combined oral contraceptive. CONCLUSIONS: A clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction was observed during co-administration of a combined oral contraceptive and lamotrigine. A dosage adjustment for lamotrigine may need to be considered when these agents are co-administered. A modest decrease in the plasma concentration of levonorgestrel was also observed but there was no corresponding hormonal evidence of ovulation.     

Influence of avosentan (SPP3OI) on the pharmacokinetics of a second generation oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel in healthy female volunteers

BACKGROUND: Avosentan (SPP301) is a potent and highly selective ETA receptor blocker and is clinically investigated in diabetic nephropathy. This study was designed to evaluate whether avosentan influences the pharmacokinetics of steroid oral contraceptives. METHODS: During a run-in phase, 16 healthy females received an oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol 0.03 mg and levonorgestrel 0.15 mg for the first 21 days of a minimum of one menstrual cycle. In a subsequent double-blind, randomized two menstrual cycle crossover treatment phase, subjects received either avosentan 25 mg or placebo once daily concomitantly with the oral contraceptive. Serum ethinylestradiol and plasma levonorgestrel concentrations were measured on Days 14 and 15 of the two treatment periods for the evaluation of the 24-hour kinetic parameters, and an additional sample was collected on Day 21 to determine their trough concentrations. Serum progesterone, luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels as well as plasma avosentan and Ro 68-5925 levels were determined on Days 13, 14, 15 and 21 of each cycle of the treatment phase. RESULTS: Avosentan had a statistically significant lowering effect of 9 - 15% on the ethinylestradiol serum concentration levels. The 90% confidence intervals of the pharmacokinetic parameters did not include 1 or exceeded the 0.8 - 1.25 acceptance range for lack of interaction. The plasma concentration-time curves and pharmacokinetic parameters of levonor-gestrel were not statistically different during concomitant treatment with either avosentan or placebo. Compared to placebo, avosentan lowered the serum concentrations of progesterone statistically significantly by about 8% and increased slightly the LH and FSH serum concentrations. Safety and tolerability patterns were comparable during avosentan and placebo administration. CONCLUSION: Because of the effect of avosentan on the concentration levels of ethinylestradiol and progesterone, it is possible that the contraceptive efficacy of low-dose combination oral contraceptives may be adversely affected during avosentan treatment.     

Influence of ethinylestradiol-containing combination oral contraceptives with gestodene or levonorgestrel on caffeine elimination

In a controlled clinical trial, the elimination of caffeine was examined in 20 healthy women prior to and during one cycle of treatment with either of two oral contraceptive formulations, one containing 0.075 mg gestodene and 0.03 mg ethinylestradiol and one containing 0.125 mg levonorgestrel and 0.03 mg ethinylestradiol. In addition, caffeine clearance was determined 1 month after the last intake of the oral contraceptives. Compared with pretreatment values, the clearance of caffeine was reduced by about 54% and 55% after one treatment cycle with gestodene- and the levonorgestrel-containing oral contraceptive, respectively. Other pharmacokinetic parameters of caffeine, such as t _max and C _max, were not affected. Clearance values returned to pretreatment values 1 month after the last administration of the oral contraceptives. There was no difference in the reduction of caffeine clearance between contraceptive formulations. A small, but significant difference in the AUC(0–24 h) values of ethinylestradiol was noted between both preparations. There was no correlation between the AUC(model) values of caffeine and the AUC(0–24 h) values of ethinylestradiol. In the present study, a somewhat more pronounced effect on the elimination of caffeine was observed than in previous investigations, where several contraceptive steroids were administered only for a period of 2 weeks.     

Lansoprazole does not affect the bioavailability of oral contraceptives.

The effects of the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole on the bioavailability of a low-dose oral contraceptive (OC), containing 0.03 mg ethinyloestradiol (EE) and 0.15 mg levonorgestrel (LNG), were investigated. Twenty-four healthy females (aged 19-35 years; weight 60.6 +/- 7.1 kg) participated in a multiple-dose, placebo-controlled, randomized two-way cross-over study. All subjects received the OC over 2 full menstrual cycles from day 1 to day 21 separated by a drug-free interval of 7 days. Lansoprazole (60 mg day-1) or placebo was coadministered for 3 weeks each. Plasma concentrations of EE and LNG were determined by GC-MS. The 90% confidence intervals for ratios of Cmax and AUC after log transformation of both EE and LNG ranged between 91 and 111%, indicating that lansoprazole did not affect the bioavailability of EE and LNG.     

Lack of effect of rosiglitazone on the pharmacokinetics of oral contraceptives in healthy female volunteers

The effect of rosiglitazone (Avandia [BRL 49653C]) on the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol and norethindrone was evaluated after repeat dosing of rosiglitazone with an oral contraceptive (OC; Ortho-Novum 1/35 containing norethindrone 1 mg and ethinylestradiol 0.035 mg) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Thirty-four healthy female volunteers received oral rosiglitazone (RSG) 8 mg + OC or matched placebo (P) + OC daily on days 1 to 14 of a 28-day OC dosing cycle; the alternate regimen was administered during a second cycle. Ethinylestradiol and norethindrone pharmacokinetics were determined from plasma concentrations on day 14. Lack of pharmacokinetic effect was prospectively defined as 90% CI for the point estimate (PE) of the ratio (RSG + OC):(P + OC) contained within a 20% equivalence range for both ethinylestradiol and norethindrone (analyzed by ANOVA). For RSG + OC and P + OC, respectively, mean ethinylestradiol AUC(0-24) was 1126 and 1208 pg.h/mL (PE: 0.92; 90% CI: 0.88-0.97), and mean norethindrone AUC(0-24) was 178 and 171 ng.h/mL (PE: 1.04; 90% CI: 1.00-1.07). Thus, rosiglitazone had no significant effects on the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol or norethindrone. Coadministration of rosiglitazone with OCs does not induce metabolism of these synthetic sex steroids and is not expected to impair the efficacy of OCs or hormone replacement therapy.     

Pharmacokinetics and serum protein binding of 3-keto-desogestrel in women during three cycles of treatment with a low-dose combination oral contraceptive.

The serum concentrations of 3-keto-desogestrel have been measured in 43 women who took a low-dose oral contraceptive containing 30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol (CAS 57-63-6) together with 150 micrograms desogestrel (CAS 54024-22-5) for a period of 3 months. Basic pharmacokinetic parameters, like Cmax, tmax and AUC, as well as the serum protein binding of 3-keto-desogestrel were determined on days 1, 10 and 21 of the first and the third treatment cycle, respectively. During cycle one, Cmax, AUC(0-4h) and AUC(0-24h) values on day 1 were 1.9 +/- 0.7 ng/ml, 3.9 +/- 1.3 ng.ml-1.h and 12.4 +/- 5.7 ng.ml-1.h, respectively. These values increased to 4.7 +/- 2.0 ng/ml, 12.1 +/- 5.6 ng.ml-1.h and 47.3 +/- 26.0 ng.ml-1.h on day 21. Within cycle 3, a similar, although less steep increase was observed for these parameters and there was practically no difference in the values of corresponding parameters on day 21 of both cycles. Throughout treatment, there was a redistribution of 3-keto-desogestrel with respect to the binding proteins albumin and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG). During cycle 1, the free fraction decreased from 1.8% on day 1 to 1.1% on day 21, and the SHBG-bound fraction increased at the same time from 40% to 62%, mainly at the expense of the albumin-bound fraction. During cycle 3, there were only minor changes as compared to cycle one. The observed changes in the serum protein binding were related to an increase in SHBG levels during the treatment period.     

Tazarotene does not affect the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of a norethindrone/ethinylestradiol oral contraceptive

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between oral tazarotene and an oral contraceptive containing norethindrone 1mg and ethinylestradiol 0.035 mg (Ortho-Novum 1/35).DESIGN: Two separate open-label, parallel-group, single-centre, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction studies.PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven healthy women (age 20-55 years) completed Study I, with a duration of 64 days during three consecutive menstrual cycles. Ortho-Novum 1/35 was taken once daily from study day 0 (first cycle day 1) to day 61 (third cycle day 6), and oral tazarotene 1.1 mg was coadministered daily from study day 34 (second cycle day 7) to day 61. Twenty-nine healthy women (age 20-44 years) completed Study II, with a duration of 75 days during three consecutive menstrual cycles. Ortho-Novum 1/35 was taken once daily from study day 0 (first cycle day 1) to day 74 (third cycle day 19), and oral tazarotene 6 mg was coadministered daily from study day 48 (second cycle day 21) to day 74. In both studies, the pharmacokinetics of tazarotenic acid on study day 61 (third cycle day 6) were evaluated from plasma tazarotenic acid concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters of plasma norethindrone and ethinylestradiol were compared before and after tazarotene administration (cycle day 6 of the second and third cycles, respectively). Serum luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations were compared before and after tazarotene administration (cycle days 2, 4 and 6 of the second and third cycles, respectively). In Study II, serum progesterone concentrations were also determined on cycle days 18 and 20 of the second and third cycles. Tazarotenic acid was determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Ethinylestradiol and norethindrone were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. LH and FSH were assayed by microparticle enzyme immunoassay in Study I and by double-antibody radioimmunoassay in Study II. Progesterone was determined by solid-phase radioimmunoassay.RESULTS: In Study I (tazarotene 1.1 mg), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to 24 hours (AUC24) and the peak concentration in plasma (Cmax) for tazarotenic acid were 121 +/- 27 microg. h/L and 28.9 +/- 9.4 microg/L (mean +/- SD), respectively. In Study II (tazarotene 6 mg), AUC24 and Cmax for tazarotenic acid were 379 +/- 78 microg. h/L and 111 +/- 37 microg/L (mean +/- SD), respectively. In both studies, for both norethindrone and ethinylestradiol, the 90% CIs of AUC24 and Cmax on cycle day 6 before and after tazarotene administration were within the 80-125% boundary. In Study I, the 90% CIs of serum FSH and LH concentrations on cycle day 4 were within the 80-125% boundary. FSH and LH concentrations on cycle day 6 were marginally/partially outside the 80-125% boundary as a result of high variability. However, the mean FSH and LH serum concentrations on cycle day 6 of the third cycle were lower than those of the second cycle. In Study II, the 90% CIs of serum FSH, LH and progesterone concentrations were all within the 80-125% boundary, except for LH on cycle day 2. LH concentrations on cycle day 2 were marginally/partially outside the 80-125% boundary as a result of high variability. However, the mean serum LH concentration on cycle day 2 of the third cycle was lower than that of the second cycle.CONCLUSIONS: Oral tazarotene up to 6 mg once daily does not affect the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of Ortho-Novum 1/35.     

Absence of pharmacokinetic interactions of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring NuvaRing with oral amoxicillin or doxycycline in two randomised trials

BACKGROUND: Two pharmacokinetic studies were performed to investigate whether there is any interaction between etonogestrel or ethinylestradiol released from the combined contraceptive vaginal ring NuvaRing and concomitant treatment with orally administered amoxicillin or doxycycline. METHODS: In one study, healthy women were randomised to receive either NuvaRing alone for 21 days or NuvaRing for 21 days plus amoxicillin on days 1-10. After a 7-day ring-free washout period, women were crossed over to the alternate regimen for a further 21-day treatment period. The other study used an identical design except that women received doxycycline instead of amoxicillin. The amoxicillin study measured serum etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol levels and area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) values over the initial 12 hours on days 1 (AUC(12)) and 10 (AUC(216-228)) and the whole of days 1-11 (AUC(240)) and 1-22 (AUC(504)). The doxycycline study measured AUC values over the initial 24 hours on days 1 (AUC(24)) and 10 (AUC(216-240)) and the whole of days 1-11 (AUC(240)) and 1-22 (AUC(504)). RESULTS: No differences in etonogestrel or ethinylestradiol serum concentrations were observed between subjects using NuvaRing alone versus those receiving the ring plus either of the antibiotics. Calculation of etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol interaction/control ratios confirmed the absence of pharmacokinetic interactions. CONCLUSION: The results from these studies demonstrate the absence of pharmacokinetic interactions between etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol released from NuvaRing and the oral antibiotics amoxicillin and doxycycline, suggesting that contraceptive efficacy would also be unaffected.     

Pharmacokinetics of zidovudine after the initial single dose and during chronic-dose therapy in HIV-infected patients.

The pharmacokinetics of zidovudine in 10 symptomatic HIV-infected men were assessed after administration of the initial 200 mg oral dose at the start of therapy (day 1) and on one occasion during non steady-state conditions of chronic-dose therapy (200 mg every 4 h while awake on day 21-66; 5 doses per day). The following mean (+/- s.d.) pharmacokinetic parameters were determined on day 1 and during chronic therapy, respectively: Cmax (4.09 +/- 2.54 vs 3.82 +/- 1.03 mumol l-1), oral clearance (40.7 +/- 12.9 vs 41.1 +/- 8.4 ml min-1 kg-1) and terminal half-life (68.4 +/- 29.4 vs 65.1 +/- 13.1 min). Mean pharmacokinetic parameters on day 1 were < 10% different (P > 0.34) from those determined during chronic therapy. Differences in means of 21% for clearance and 36% for Cmax could be detected with a power of 80% at the 5% significance level. Intra-subject coefficients of variation were 17% for clearance and 32% for Cmax, respectively. This study suggests that within a group of patients whose stage of HIV infection and general health are relatively stable, first-dose pharmacokinetic parameters provide a good estimate of multiple-dose pharmacokinetic parameters.     

Single and multiple dose bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of gliclazide modified release tablets in healthy Chinese male volunteers

Randomized, two-way, crossover, single- and multiple-dose studies were conducted in healthy Chinese male volunteers to evaluate the bioequivalence of two brands of gliclazide (CAS 21187-98-4, 1-(3-azabicylco(3, 3, 0)oct-3-yl)-3-p-tolysulfonylurea) 30 mg tablets, viz. Gliclazide modified release (MR) tablets as test (T) and a commercial gliclazide standard preparation as reference (R) product. Each volunteer received T and R tablets separated by 7 days of a drug-free washout period. The plasma concentrations of gliclazide, determined by a validated LC-ESI-MS method, were employed to assess the pharmacokinetic parameters such as maximum and minimum observed plasma concentration (Cmax and Cmin), time to Cmax (tmax), average plasma concentration at steady state (Cav), area under plasma concentration curve (AUC(0-72), AUC(0-infinity) and AUC(ss), and degree of fluctuation for plasma concentration (DF %). As to these parameters, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed no significant difference and 90 % confidence intervals (CI) fell entirely into the acceptable range of bioequivalence. Based on these statistical inferences, the two formulations are considered bioequivalent in the extent and rate of absorption from both single- and multiple-dose studies.     

Comparative bioequivalence study of leflunomide tablets in Indian healthy volunteers

The pharmacokinetics of teriflunomide [CAS No. 163451-81-8], the metabolite of leflunomide [CAS No. 75706-12-6] has been evaluated in adult human volunteers after oral administration of tablet formulation. However, no published data is available regarding the bioavailability of this in the Indian population. In light of the above, a study was designed to carry out a bioequivalence study of 2 preparations of leflunomide 20 mg in healthy Indian male volunteers.24 healthy male volunteers (age, 25±4.1 years; weight, 57.58±7.01 kg) were enrolled in this study. Each subject received a test and reference formulation in a single dose, fasting 2 period, 2 way crossover study with a wash out period of 4 weeks. Analysis of teriflunomide from plasma samples was done by a simple and sensitive HPLC method using UV detection developed in our laboratory. An analysis of variance was performed on the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ using GLM procedures in which sources of variation were subject, formulation, and period.The results indicated that there are no statistically significant differences between the 2 products in either the mean concentration-time profiles or in the obtained pharmacokinetic parameters. 90% confidence limits for the log transformed data of Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞. were within the acceptable range of 0.80-1.25.The results indicate that the 2 products are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of drug absorption. Both the preparations were well tolerated with no adverse reactions throughout the study.     

Treatment with liraglutide--a once-daily GLP-1 analog--does not reduce the bioavailability of ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel taken as an oral combination contraceptive drug

Liraglutide is a once-daily human GLP-1 analog for treatment of type 2 diabetes. Like other GLP-1 analogs, liraglutide delays gastric emptying, which could potentially affect absorption of concomitantly administered oral drugs. This study investigated the effect of liraglutide on the pharmacokinetics of the components of an oral contraceptive (ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel). Postmeno-pausal healthy women (n = 21) were included. A single dose of this contraceptive was administered. Blood samples for ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel measurements were drawn until 74 hours post dosing of the contraceptive during liraglutide and placebo treatments. The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio of the area under the curve (AUC) (1.06; 90% CI, 0.99-1.13) for ethinyl estradiol (during liraglutide and placebo) was within defined limits, demonstrating equivalence. The 90% CI for the ratio of AUC for levonorgestrel was not fully contained within the limits (1.18; 90% CI, 1.04-1.34) (levonorgestrel AUC was 18% greater with liraglutide vs placebo). However, equivalence was demonstrated for levonorgestrel AUC(0-t) (1.15; 90% CI, 1.06-1.24). Equivalence was not demonstrated for maximum concentration (C(max)); values for ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel C(max) were 12% and 13% lower with liraglutide versus placebo, respectively. Both reached C(max) ~1.5 hours later with liraglutide. No clinically relevant reduction in bioavailability of ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel occurred.     

Pharmacokinetics of buspirone following oral administration to rhesus monkeys.

Pharmacokinetics of buspirone and its active metabolite, 1-pyrimidinyl piperazine (1-PP) following oral administration were assessed in rhesus monkeys at doses used in chronic toxicology studies. The study was conducted over four periods in three male and three female rhesus monkeys. In the first three periods, buspirone hydrochloride solution was administered in a randomized manner by oral gavage at doses (expressed as buspirone free base) of 12.5, 25 and 50 mg kg(-1) once a day on days 1 and 7 and twice a day on days 2-6. In the last period, all monkeys received 25 mg kg(-1) buspirone as a single daily dose for 7 days. Serial plasma samples were collected for analysis of buspirone and 1-PP on days 1 and 7 in the first three periods and on day 7 in the last period for assessment of single dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics. Inter-animal variability in the pharmacokinetics of buspirone was high. Examination of Cmin vs time plots revealed that the steady state was attained by day 7 except for one monkey who demonstrated much higher Cmin values. For buspirone, dose proportionality was concluded for both Cmax and AUC on day 1 but not on day 7. The accumulation factor on day 7 for buspirone was nearly 5 for Cmax and 7 for AUC when compared with day 1. For 1-PP, dose proportionality was concluded except for Cmax in male monkeys on day 7. In contrast to buspirone, 1-PP showed less than 2-fold accumulation in Cmax and AUC values on day 7 compared with those on day 1. Exposure at a dose of 25 mg kg(-1) once daily was in between the 125 mg kg(-1) and 25 mg kg(-1) twice-a-day regimens. These results document dose-dependency in the steady-state pharmacokinetics of buspirone in rhesus monkeys.     

Bioequivalence study of a fixed dose combination of nitazoxanide and ofloxacin in Indian healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetics of nitazoxanide (CAS 55981-09-4) and ofloxacin (CAS 82419-36-1) has been extensively evaluated in adult human volunteers individually after oral administration of tablet formulation. However, no published data is available regarding the combined pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of this particular fixed dose combination. In light of the above, a clinical study was designed to evaluate the bioequivalence of two fixed dose combination (FDC) products of two manufacturers containing nitazoxanide 500 mg and ofloxacin 200 mg in healthy Indian male volunteers. METHODS: 24 healthy male volunteers (age 25 +/- 4.6 years; weight 74.5 +/- 7.87 kg) were enrolled in this study. Each subject received a Test fixed dose combination and a Reference fixed dose combination formulation in a randomized, single dose, fasting state, two period, crossover study design with a 1-week washout period between the doses. Extraction of the drugs from the plasma was carried out by precipitation method. Analysis of tizoxanide (active metabolite of nitazoxanide) and ofloxacin from plasma samples was done by a simple and sensitive HPLC method using UV detection developed in our laboratory. An analysis of variance was performed on the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity). using general linear model (GLM) procedures in which sources of variation were subject, formulation, period. RESULTS: The results of this investigation indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the two products in either the mean concentration-time profiles or in the obtained pharmacokinetic parameters. 90 % confidence limits for the log-transformed data of Cmax, AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) were within the acceptable range of 0.80-1.25. CONCLUSION: Thus, these findings clearly indicate that the two products are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of drug absorption. Both the preparations were well tolerated with no adverse reactions seen throughout the study.     

Pharmacokinetics and protein binding of gestodene under treatment with a low-dose combination oral contraceptive for three months.

The serum concentrations of gestodene (CAS 60282-87-3) as well as the binding of this progestin to serum proteins were studied in 40 women who took a low-dose oral contraceptive (Femovan, Femodene) containing 30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol (CAS 57-63-6) and 75 micrograms gestodene for 3 months. On days 1, 10, and 21 of the first and the third treatment cycle, respectively, 7 blood samples were drawn before and up to 4 h after pill intake; additional samples were taken prior to morning ingestion of pill on days 2, 5, 11, 15 and 22 of these cycles. Gestodene levels were measured by means of a specific radioimmunoassay and were evaluated for Cmax, tmax, and AUC up to 4 and 24 h. Independent of the test day and the treatment cycle studied, mean maximum gestodene serum levels were found about 0.8 to 0.9 h after pill intake. During the first treatment cycle, mean values of Cmax, AUC(0-4h), and AUC(0-24h) amounted to 4.3 ng.ml-1, 9.3 ng.ml-1.h, and 27.3 ng.ml-1.h on test day 1; these values increased by 250-400% and by 300-500%, respectively, when days 10 and 21 were compared to day 1. On day 1 of the third treatment cycle, these pharmacokinetic parameters were higher by almost a factor of two as compared to the corresponding data obtained on the beginning of the first cycle whereas the increase of these values between day 1 and the subsequent test days (200-300%) was slightly lower in cycle 3 as compared to cycle 1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Influence of drugs interacting with CYP3A4 on the pharmacokinetics,pharmacodynamics, and safety of the prandial glucose regulator repaglinide

The object of this study was to analyze drug interactions between repaglinide, a short-acting insulin secretagogue, and five other drugs interacting with CYP3A4: ketoconazole, rifampicin, ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel (in an oral contraceptive), simvastatin, and nifedipine. In two open-label, two-period, randomized crossover studies, healthy subjects received repaglinide alone, repaglinide on day 5 of ketoconazole treatment, or repaglinide on day 7 of rifampicin treatment. In three open-label, three-period, randomized crossover studies, healthy subjects received 5 days of repaglinide alone; 5 days of ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel, simvastatin, or nifedipine alone; or 5 days of repaglinide concomitant with ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel, simvastatin, or nifedipine. Compared to administration of repaglinide alone, concomitant ketoconazole increased mean AUC0-infinity for repaglinide by 15% and mean Cmax by 7%. Concomitant rifampicin decreased mean AUC0-infinity for repaglinide by 31% and mean Cmax by 26%. Concomitant treatment with CYP3A4 substrates altered mean AUC0-5 h and mean Cmax for repaglinide by 1% and 17% (ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel), 2% and 27% (simvastatin), or 11% and 3% (nifedipine). Profiles of blood glucose concentration following repaglinide dosing were altered by less than 8% by both ketoconazole and rifampicin. In all five studies, most adverse events were related to hypoglycemia, as expected in a normal population given a blood glucose regulator. The safety profile of repaglinide was not altered by pretreatment with ketoconazole or rifampicin or by coadministration with ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel. The incidence of adverse events increased with coadministration of simvastatin or nifedipine compared to either repaglinide or simvastatin/nifedipine treatment alone. No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions occurred between repaglinide and the CYP3A4 substrates ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel, simvastatin, or nifedipine. The pharmacokinetic profile of repaglinide was altered by administration of potent inhibitors or inducers, such as ketoconazole or rifampicin, but to a lesser degree than expected. These results are probably explained by the metabolic pathway of repaglinide that involves other enzymes than CYP3A4, reflected to some extent by a small change in repaglinide pharmacodynamics. Thus, careful monitoring of blood glucose in repaglinide-treated patients receiving strong inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4 is recommended, and an increase in repaglinide dose may be necessary. No safety concerns were observed, except a higher incidence in adverse events in patients receiving repaglinide and simvastatin or nifedipine.     

Plasma tenoxicam concentrations after single and multiple oral doses

The pharmacokinetics of single- and multiple-dose administration of tenoxicam 20 mg were evaluated in 8 healthy males. Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) after the first dose was 2.76 +/- 0.48 micrograms/ml (mean +/- s.d.) and the time to reach Cmax (Tmax) was 5.0 +/- 3.0 h. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity) after a single administration of tenoxicam was 242.5 +/- 73.5 micrograms x h/ml. The elimination half-life (t1/2) was 66.3 +/- 15.8 h and the plasma concentration at 24 hours after dosing (Cmin) was 1.84 +/- 0.33 micrograms/ml. Steady-state plasma concentrations of tenoxicam were virtually reached after 10 consecutive daily doses. At steady-state, Cmax averaged 13.63 +/- 3.33 micrograms/ml and Tmax remained 5.0 +/- 3.0 hours. AUC within a dosing interval at steady-state was 262.2 +/- 67.0 micrograms x h/ml, Cminss was 9.67 +/- 3.25 micrograms/ml, and t1/2 averaged 74.2 +/- 13.3 h. The average fluctuation during multiple-dose administration was 26.8 +/- 8.0% and the accumulation ratio was 5.82 +/- 0.60. Steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters predicted from the first-dose data slightly underestimated observed values, but the results supported the assumption of linear pharmacokinetics during multiple-dose tenoxicam administration.     

The pharmacokinetics of orally administered fudosteine in healthy Chinese volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics of fudosteine in healthy Chinese volunteers was investigated for the first time after single- and multiple-dose administration. Five male and five female volunteers were enrolled in this study. Each subject received 400 mg fudosteine capsules (the therapeutic dose) on day 1 after overnight fasting for the single-dose study and three times daily oral administration (400 mg) for 5 consecutive days until the sixth morning for the multiple-dose study. Serial blood samples were collected at specified time intervals up to 16 hours following the first and last doses of fudosteine. Plasma harvested from the blood was separated and analyzed for fudosteine levels by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HPLC/ESI/MS) method employing percolumn derivatization with 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate (FMOC-Cl). Noncompartmental analysis was used for the calculation of the total area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to time infinity and the terminal half-life (t1/2) of fudosteine. The pharmacokinetic parameters for single- and multiple-dose administration were estimated as follows: Cmax amounted to 10.13+/-4.39 microg/mL and 11.75+/-6.51 microg/mL, tmax to 0.69+/-0.36 h and 0.53+/-0.12 h and t1/2 to 2.33+/-0.63 h and 2.40+/-0.37 h, respectively. No significant differences were found between single- and multiple-dose oral administration, although gender differences were observed.     

Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence studies of trospium chloride after a single-dose administration in healthy Chinese volunteers

The study aimed to compare and evaluate the bioequivalence of a new generic preparation of trospium chloride (CAS NO:10405-02-4) capsule (20 mg, test) and the available import tablet (20 mg , reference) for the requirement of state regulatory criteria in China. A randomized- sequence, 2-period crossover study was conducted in 20 healthy Chinese male volunteers in the fasted state. Blood samples were collected before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 h after administration of a single oral dose of 40 mg trospium chloride capsules or tablets, followed by a 7-day washout period. The concentration of trospium chloride was determined by a LC-MS/MS method. Drug And Statistical-Version 2.0 was used to calculate the pharmacokinetics parameters and assess bioequivalence of the two preparations. It was considered bioequivalent if the 90% CIs of the mean ratios (test: reference) for Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were within the range from 80% to 125%, respectively. The main pharmacokinetics parameters of test and reference were as follows: t1/2 was (15.11 ± 3.24) h and (16.00 ± 3.96) h; Tmax was (4.0 ± 1.2) h and (4.1 ± 0.9) h; Cmax was (3.76 ± 1.87) ng·mL - 1 and (3.70 ± 1.89) ng·mL - 1; AUC0-t was (33.51 ± 14.39) ng·mL - 1·h and (33.33 ± 14.88) ng·mL - 1·h, and the AUC0-∞ was (35.20 ± 14.88) ng·mL - 1·h and (35.16±15.17) ng·mL - 1·h. The ratios (test: reference) for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 94.0%~111.7%, 96.4%~106.8%, and 96.1%~105.3%, respectively. No significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were found between preparations and periods (p>0.05). No obvious adverse events were monitored throughout the study based on clinical parameters and patient reports.