Modulation of cisplatin pharmacodynamics by Cremophor EL: experimental and clinical studies

The paclitaxel vehicle Cremophor EL (CrEL) has been shown to selectively inhibit the accumulation of cisplatin in peripheral blood leucocytes, but not in tumour cells in vitro, and we hypothesised that this phenomenon is responsible for the improvement of the therapeutic index of cisplatin observed in combination studies with paclitaxel. Here, we report on studies assessing the interaction between CrEL and cisplatin in a murine model, and involving the potential clinical applicability of CrEL as a protector for cisplatin-associated haematological side-effects. In mice, CrEL (0.17 ml/kg, intravenous (i.v.)) given in combination with cisplatin (10 mg/kg, intraperitoneal (i.p.)) did not change the pharmacokinetics of cisplatin. Cisplatin-induced haematological toxicity, expressed as white blood cells (WBC) at nadir, was significantly reduced by CrEL from 5.05±0.95 to 6.50±1.31×10⁹/l (P=0.0009). Data obtained from cancer patients treated with cisplatin (70 mg/m², 3-h i.v.) and topotecan (0.45 or 0.60 mg/m²/day×2) preceded by CrEL (12 ml, 3-h i.v.) (n=6) or without CrEL (n=10) similarly indicated significant differences in the percent decrease in WBC between the groups (46.5±18.7 versus 67.2±15.0%; P=0.029). Likewise, the percent decrease in platelet count was significantly greater in the absence of CrEL (23.9±5.38 versus 73.3±15.5%; P=0.0003). Pharmacokinetic parameters of unbound and total cisplatin and of topotecan lactone and total drug were not significantly different from historic control values (P⩾0.245). Overall, this study provides further evidence on the important role of CrEL in the pharmacological and toxicological profile of cisplatin, and implies that reformulation of cisplatin with CrEL for systemic treatment might achieve an improvement of its therapeutic index, particularly in the setting of a weekly dose-dense concept.     

Phase I study of weekly paclitaxel and liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumours

The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of a weekly administration of paclitaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx; Schering Plough Pharmaceutical) in patients with advanced solid tumours. 19 pretreated patients with solid tumours received escalated doses of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (6-12 mg/m(2)) as a 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by a fixed dose of paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) weekly for 4 consecutive weeks in cycles of 6 weeks. DLT was defined as grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, grades 3 or 4 non-haematological toxicity or treatment delay due to unresolved toxicity during cycle 1. The MTD was reached at the dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin of 10 mg/m(2)/week and paclitaxel of 80 mg/m(2)/week. The DLTs were treatment delay due to grade 3 neutropenia and grade 3 diarrhoea. A total of 55 chemotherapy cycles were administered, and grades 3-4 neutropenia occurred in seven cycles (13%); the non-haematological toxicity was mild with grades 2/3 diarrhoea occurring in 4 (7%), grades 2-4 asthenia in 11 (20%) and grade 2 mucositis in 7 (13%) cycles. There was no case with more than a 10% LVEF decrease after a median of 3 (range 2-6) administered cycles/patients. One patient with breast cancer and 1 with ovarian cancer experienced a major partial response. The weekly administration of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin at the dose of 10 mg/m(2) in combination with paclitaxel at the dose of 80 mg/m(2) for 4 consecutive weeks, in cycles of 6 weeks which represent the recommended doses for further phase II studies, is a well tolerated regimen, which merits further evaluation in tumours known to be sensitive to taxanes and/or anthracyclines.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of the combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and topotecan administered intravenously every 21 days as first-line therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of administering topotecan in combination with paclitaxel and cisplatin without and with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support as first-line chemotherapy in women with incompletely resected stage III and stage IV ovarian carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Starting doses were paclitaxel 110 mg/m2 administered over 24 hours (day 1), followed by cisplatin 50 mg/m2 over 3 hours (day 2) and topotecan 0.3 mg/m2/d over 30 minutes for 5 consecutive days (days 2 to 6). Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. After encountering dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) without G-CSF support, the maximum-tolerated dose was defined as 5 microg/kg of G-CSF subcutaneously starting on day 6. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients received a total of 116 courses at four different dose levels. The DLT was neutropenia. At the first dose level, all six patients experienced grade 4 myelosuppression. G-CSF support permitted further dose escalation of cisplatin and topotecan. Nonhematologic toxicities, primarily fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and neurosensory neuropathy, were observed but were generally mild. Of 15 patients assessable for response, nine had a complete response, four achieved a partial response, and two had stable disease. CONCLUSION: Neutropenia was the DLT of this combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and topotecan. The recommended phase II dose is paclitaxel 110 mg/m2 (day 1), followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (day 2) and topotecan 0.3 mg/m2/d (days 2 to 6) with G-CSF support repeated every 3 weeks.     

拓扑替康治疗小细胞肺癌Ⅱ期临床研究

目的：观察围产拓扑替康单药二线治疗复发性小细胞肺癌（small cell lung cancer,SCLC)和与顺铂联合方案治疗初治SCLC的疗效及毒性。方法：采用多中心开放式研究方法,在100例病例中有97例符合人组条件,其中采用拓扑替康单药治疗的复发SCLC38例,用药方法为拓扑替康1．25mg/(m^2.d)连用5天,每3周一疗程;拓扑替康与顺铂联合用于初治SCLC病例59例,顺铂80mg/(m^2.d)d1,拓扑替康1mg/(m^2.d),连用5天,每3周一疗程。结果：拓扑替康单药用于复发SCLC有效率为37．5％,其中CR3．1％,34．4％,与顺铂联合用于初治SCLC细胞缺乏,Ⅲ-Ⅳ度血小板下降31．6％,而联用药组Ⅲ-Ⅳ度中性粒细胞缺乏61．0％,Ⅲ-Ⅳ度血小板下降39．0％,非血液学毒性较轻,结论：拓扑替康是治疗SCLC的有效药物之一,联合顺铂后可提高疗效,拓扑替康的主要毒副反应为血液学毒性。     

Phase I trial of topotecan plus vinorelbine with/without filgrastim (G-CSF) in patients with refractory malignancies

The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan plus vinorelbine with and without filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) in refractory solid tumors. Cohorts of three patients with recurrent solid tumors previously treated with no more than one chemotherapy regimen were entered. All patients had a performance status of 0 to 1 with adequate hepatic, renal, and bone marrow function and were treated with topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 to 3 followed by vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 without filgrastim every 3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on standard criteria for phase I escalation with a maximum of five patients in a cohort until an MTD was defined (first without then with filgrastim). Three patients were treated at dose level 1 (topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 days 1-3 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) without filgrastim. All three experienced hematologic dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) including grade IV neutropenia in two patients and grade III thrombocytopenia in one patient. An additional two patients, supported with filgrastim, treated at dose level 1 experienced DLT. One patient had dose-limiting neutropenia and the other had significant nonhematologic toxicity. No objective responses were seen, and all patients died within 6 months of entering the trial. The combination of topotecan and vinorelbine was poorly tolerated in the dose and schedule tested in this phase I trial. Subsequent combinations of these drugs, if warranted, should focus on alternate doses, schedules, or routes of administration.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of sequential topotecan-carboplatin-etoposide in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer

The inhibition of topoisomerase I by topotecan results in a compensatory increase in topoisomerase II associated with increased in vitro sensitivity of tumors to etoposide. Maximal synergy has been observed for the sequence of topotecan followed by etoposide. Carboplatin has clinical activity when combined with either of these two agents. These interactions were the pharmacologic rationale for topotecan p.o. days 1-5, carboplatin i.v. day 6, and etoposide p.o. days 6-10. Three successive dose levels were explored: (1) topotecan 2mg/day, carboplatin AUC 5, etoposide 150 mg/day; (2) topotecan 3mg/day, carboplatin AUC 5, etoposide 150 mg/day; and (3) topotecan 3mg/day, carboplatin AUC 5, etoposide 200mg/day. Filgrastim 5 microg/kg/day was injected s.c. days 11-18. Up to 6 cycles were administered every 21 days. Eligible patients had measurable or evaluable, extensive disease, small lung cell lung cancer, no prior chemotherapy, ECOG performance status 0-2, and adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. Follow-up was weekly for CBC. Tumor response was assessed after 2 and 6 cycles. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any of the following in cycle 1: grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity other than nausea and vomiting, grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 3 days, neutropenic fever or sepsis, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, or failure to recover neutrophils >or=1500/microl or platelets >or=100,000/microl by day 28. Ten patients were enrolled: median age 62 (range, 50-79); female/male 4/6; and performance status 0/1/2 in 2/7/1. Three patients each were treated on dose levels 1 and 2 without DLT. The first 2 patients entered on dose level 3 had no DLT. The third patient on dose level 3 developed grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 3 days, neutropenic fever, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia on day 15 of cycle 1. The fourth patient on dose level 3 developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia on day 18 of cycle 1. One patient received only 1 cycle and was not evaluable for response. Seven patients completed 6 cycles: 1 had a complete response and 6 achieved a partial response. The third patient on dose level 3 received 2 cycles and had stable disease, but had to be removed from protocol treatment because of grade 4 neutropenia despite dose reduction in cycle 2. The fourth patient on dose level 3 achieved a partial response, but had to be removed from protocol therapy after cycle 5 because of recurrent grade 4 thrombocytopenia. In conclusion, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were dose-limiting. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is topotecan 3mg/day p.o. days 1-5, carboplatin AUC 5i.v. day 6, and etoposide 150 mg/day p.o. days 6-10 with filgrastim.     

A phase I study of topotecan as a radiosensitizer for brainstem glioma of childhood: first report of the Children's Cancer Group-0952

Our purpose was to establish the maximum tolerated dosage (MTD) of daily i.v. topotecan with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (XRT) for patients with intrinsic pontine glioma of childhood. Topotecan was given as a 30-min i.v. infusion 30-60 min before each XRT treatment given daily for 33 days. Total XRT dose was 59.4 Gy. Dose escalation of topotecan was carried out using a standard phase I design. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of < or =500/mm(3) for > or =7 days; platelets of < or =50,000/mm(3) for > or =7 days; >7 days platelet transfusions; fever and neutropenia (ANC < or =500/mm(3) for > or =7 days); and/or any > or=grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity. In this multi-institutional phase I study, 17 patients <21 years with intrinsic pontine glioma were enrolled. Sixteen patients completed treatment. An ANC < or =500/mm(3) for > or =7 days occurred in 2/5 patients at 0.50 mg/m(2) of topotecan, which was the DLT. The remaining 14 patients received topotecan without experiencing DLT. One patient at 0.40 mg/m(2) died of disease progression while on treatment. There were 6 other grade 4 hematologic events (5 ANCs <500/mm(3), 1 hemoglobin <6. 5 g/dl) not meeting DLT criteria. No significant non-hematologic toxicities were seen. The actuarial median survival time is 15 months (95% confidence interval, 9.6-19 months); 1-year survival is 53%. DLT of daily topotecan with cranial XRT is grade 4 neutropenia for > or =7 days at 0.50 mg/m(2) x 33 (total dosage = 16.5 mg/m(2)); the recommended safe MTD of daily topotecan for further phase II testing is 0.40 mg/m(2) x 33 (total dosage = 13.2 mg/m(2)).     

A phase I trial defining the maximum tolerated systemic exposure of topotecan in combination with Carboplatin and Etoposide in extensive stage small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: Topotecan is active in relapsed small cell lung cancer; thus, its addition to the standard carboplatin-etoposide regimen may improve outcomes in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients. Significant interpatient variability in the topotecan systemic exposure results when it is dosed based on body surface area (mg/m2). The purpose of this Phase I trial was to determine the maximally tolerated systemic exposure (MTSE) of topotecan in combination with carboplatin and etoposide. METHODS: Thirty-four chemotherapy-na?ve ES-SCLC patients received topotecan in combination with carboplatin AUC 5 mg/mL*min and oral etoposide 100 mg/m2/day. Topotecan was administered as a 30-minute infusion either on Days 1-5 or Days 1-3 and the dosage was individualized to attain a topotecan lactone AUC range (ng/mL*hr) in successive patient cohorts from 7 to 23; 24 to 36; 37 to 53; 54 to 66. RESULTS: The majority (67 percent) of the measured topotecan AUCs were within target range. Overall, 8 of 34 patients experienced Cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), either neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Carboplatin administration prior to topotecan resulted in 2 of 6 patients having Cycle 1 DLT. When the administration sequence was changed (topotecan, carboplatin, etoposide), Cycle 1 hematologic toxicity decreased; however, the maximum topotecan lactone AUC of 24-36 ng/mL*hr (median dose 0.82 mg/m2) had significant cumulative hematologic toxicity. The number of topotecan doses were reduced from 5 to 3, which resulted in a maximum topotecan lactone AUC of 37 to 53 ng/mL*hr with only 1 of 6 patients having Cycle 1 DLT. Overall response rate was 71 percent with median survival of 10.8 months. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to target topotecan lactone AUC in adult ES-SCLC patients. However, this triplet regimen resulted in considerable hematologic toxicity and has a median survival comparable to carboplatin-etoposide. Alternative, less toxic regimens should be investigated for improving survival in ES-SCLC.     

A phase I trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine given biweekly with B-vitamin support in solid tumor malignancies or advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of biweekly pemetrexed with gemcitabine plus B(12) and folate supplementation in patients with advanced solid tumors and ovarian cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with no prior pemetrexed or gemcitabine therapy enrolled in cohorts of three, expanding to six if dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. Pemetrexed, escalated from to 700 mg/m(2), was given before gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m(2) every 14 days. DLTs were grade 4 neutropenia lasting >7 days or febrile neutropenia, grade 4 or 3 thrombocytopenia (with bleeding), grade > or =3 nonhematologic toxicity, or treatment delay of > or =1 week due to unresolved toxicity. RESULTS: The ovarian cancer cohort enrolled 24 patients with unlimited prior cytotoxic chemotherapies. MTD was observed at pemetrexed 600 mg/m(2), with 2 of 9 patients experiencing DLT. Most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities per patient were neutropenia (83%), leukopenia (67%), lymphopenia (73%), and febrile neutropenia (12%). Median cycle per patient was 8 (range, 1-16). Six of 21 (28%) patients had confirmed partial responses. Study protocol was modified for the solid tumor cohort (n = 30) to enroll patients with two or more prior cytotoxic regimens. MTD was observed at pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2), with 1 of 9 patients experiencing DLT. Most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities per patient were neutropenia (63%), lymphopenia (43%), leukopenia (70%) and febrile neutropenia (6.6%). Median cycle per patient was 4 (range, 1-20). Three of 29 (10.3%) response-evaluable patients had confirmed partial responses: 2 squamous cell carcinomas of head and neck and 1 nasopharyngeal cancer. CONCLUSION: MTDs for the solid tumor and ovarian cancer cohorts were reached at pemetrexed 500 and 600 mg/m(2), respectively, given biweekly with gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m(2).     

宫颈癌同期放化疗每周单药顺铂的Ⅰ和Ⅱ期临床试验

目的 探讨中晚期宫颈癌患者同期放化疗中适合中国人的顺铂单药化疗每周方案剂量。方法 Ⅰ_B2~Ⅳ_A期需放疗的宫颈癌患者为研究对象。Ⅰ期临床试验(15例)为剂量递增试验,顺铂剂量以20、25、30 、35、40 mg/m²逐渐递增(≥3例/剂量),40 mg/m²后不再增加剂量。依据Ⅰ期临床试验所得出的最大耐受剂量(40 mg/m²)进行Ⅱ期临床试验(36例)。盆腔放疗采用三维适形方法。结果 Ⅰ期临床试验剂量递增至顺铂40 mg/m²未出现限制性不良反应。Ⅱ期临床试验中住院的9例患者都完成了6周化疗,门诊治疗的27例患者18例完成6周化疗,19例完成5周化疗,25例完成4周化疗。所有患者都完成了放疗。主要不良反应为1、2级胃肠道反应与白细胞减少。     

A phase I study of weekly gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with advanced cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group Study

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly gemcitabine plus docetaxel, a dose escalation trial of both drugs was developed with each administered weekly for 3 weeks out of 4. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dose levels for gemcitabine (mg/m(2)) and docetaxel (mg/m(2)) were as follows: level 1: 600/25; level 2: 600/35; level 3: 750/35; and level 4: 900/35. Sixteen patients with adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were treated. Primary sites included pancreas (12) and others (4). RESULTS: Three patients were treated at each dose level from level 1 through level 4. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was neutropenia, the maximum tolerated dose being 750 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine and 35 mg/m(2) of docetaxel. No grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity was seen. Three patients had grade 4 neutropenia. Of the 12 patients with pancreatic cancer, 1 had a partial remission and 7 had stable disease with a median duration of 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine and docetaxel can be safely administered weekly at a dose of 750 and 35 mg/m(2), respectively. The DLT was neutropenia. Disease stabilization suggests that this may be an active regimen in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.     

Phase I study of carboplatin, doxorubicin and weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Doxorubicin is an active compound in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), but adding it to carboplatin-paclitaxel causes toxicity. Toxicity can be reduced by weekly administration. We examined the tolerability of weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin and doxorubicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy na?ve patients with EOC were treated with doxorubicin (50 mg/m(2) day 1), carboplatin (AUC 6 day 1) and paclitaxel (days 1, 8, 15, 21), 28-day cycle. Three patients were treated at each paclitaxel dose level, starting at 60, 75 and 90 mg/m(2)/week. If more than two patients in a cohort experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) three more patients were treated at the dose level below. RESULTS: Twelve patients with advanced EOC received a median of six cycles (range 2-6) of the three-drug combination. DLT occurred at dose level 3: prolonged grade 4 febrile neutropenia, 1 patient; grade 3 peripheral neuropathy, 1 patient. All six patients treated at dose level 2 experienced short-lived grade 4 neutropenia, which led to dose modifications resulting in an actual delivered dose of paclitaxel of 64 mg/m(2)/week. Eight out of 12 patients had measurable disease on CT scan: four obtained a partial remission; three had stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of carboplatin, doxorubicin and paclitaxel in patients with EOC is active and its main toxicity is myelosuppression. Dose intensity of paclitaxel can be maintained in a three-drug combination through weekly administration (65 mg/m(2)).     

Phase I and pharmacological study of sequential intravenous topotecan and oral etoposide.

We performed a phase I and pharmacological study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of a cytotoxic regimen of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan in combination with the topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide, and to investigate the clinical pharmacology of both compounds. Patients with advanced solid tumours were treated at 4-week intervals, receiving topotecan intravenously over 30 min on days 1-5 followed by etoposide given orally twice daily on days 6-12. Topotecan-etoposide dose levels were escalated from 0.5/20 to 1.0/20, 1.0/40, and 1.25/40 (mg m-2 day-1)/(mg bid). After encountering DLT, additional patients were treated at 3-week intervals with the topotecan dose decreased by one level to 1.0 mg m-2 and etoposide administration prolonged from 7 to 10 days to allow further dose intensification. Of 30 patients entered, 29 were assessable for toxicity in the first course and 24 for response. The DLT was neutropenia. At doses of topotecan-etoposide 1.25/40 (mg m-2)/(mg bid) two out of six patients developed neutropenia grade IV that lasted more than 7 days. Reduction of the treatment interval to 3 weeks and prolonging etoposide dosing to 10 days did not permit further dose intensification, as a time delay to retreatment owing to unrecovered bone marrow rapidly emerged as the DLT. Post-infusion total plasma levels of topotecan declined in a biphasic manner with a terminal half-life of 2.1 +/- 0.3 h. Total body clearance was 13.8 +/- 2.7 l h-1 m-2 with a steady-state volume of distribution of 36.7 +/- 6.2 l m-2. N-desmethyltopotecan, a metabolite of topotecan, was detectable in plasma and urine. Mean maximal concentrations ranged from 0.23 to 0.53 nmol l-1, and were reached at 3.4 +/- 1.0 h after infusion. Maximal etoposide plasma concentrations of 0.75 +/- 0.54 and 1.23 +/- 0.57 micromol l-1 were reached at 2.4 +/- 1.2 and 2.3 +/- 1.0 h after ingestion of 20 and 40 mg respectively. The topotecan area under the plasma concentration vs time curve (AUC) correlated with the percentage decrease in white blood cells (WBC) (r2 = 0.70) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) (r2 = 0.65). A partial response was observed in a patient with metastatic ovarian carcinoma. A total of 64% of the patients had stable disease for at least 4 months. The recommended dose for use in phase II clinical trials is topotecan 1.0 mg m-2 on days 1-5 and etoposide 40 mg bid on days 6-12 every 4 weeks.     

Phase I/II study of cisplatin combined with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose (RD) of paclitaxel administered weekly with a fixed dose of cisplatin, and to assess the toxicity and activity of this combination, we conducted a phase I/II trial in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were eligible. Paclitaxel, at a starting dose of 40 mg x m(-2) week(-1) on days 1, 8, and 15, was combined with a fixed dose of cisplatin 80 mg x m(-2) on day 1. Chemotherapy was given in a 4-week cycle. In this phase I/II study, 38 patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were neutropenia, fatigue, and omission of treatment due to leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, or febrile neutropenia. The MTD and RD were estimated to be 70 mg x m(-2). Of the 37 assessable patients, 23 had a partial response and one had a complete response. Overall response rate was 62.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 46.5-77.7%). The progression-free survival, the median survival time, and the 1-year survival rate were 5.5 months, 13.7 months, and 56.9%, respectively. This regimen is tolerable and very active against advanced NSCLC, and its efficacy should be confirmed in a phase III study.     

Phase I and pharmacological study of single paclitaxel administered weekly for heavily pre-treated patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

We have reported that paclitaxel results in cisplatin sensitization in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cell lines in vitro and in nude mice. The purpose of this trial was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommend phase II dose of weekly single agent paclitaxel for outpatients with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian carcinoma (REOC), with standard chemotherapy containing platinum in the initial setting. Patients with REOC were eligible for this protocol regardless of the number and kind of previous chemotherapy regimens. The starting dose was paclitaxel 70 mg/m2/week in 1-hour infusion, 3 weeks on, 1 off and repeated at least twice. This dose was increased by 10 mg per step to 100 mg/m2/week. Three patients were accrued to each dose cohort. Three new patients were to be entered at escalation doses unless dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) occurred, defined as grade 4 hematological or grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities. If 1 out of 3 patients developed DLT, 3 additional patients were entered at the same dose level. Sixteen patients were accrued. All the patients had received at least one prior platinum-containing regimen (1 regimen 14 cases, 2 regimens 1 case, 3 regimens 1 case). At the level I dose of 70 mg/m2/week no hematological or non-hematological toxicity more than grade 2 was observed. At the level II dose of 80 mg/m2/week, 1 patient had grade 4 non-hematological toxicity, showing difficulty-walking. Three new additional patients were treated with the same dose. Except for this patient, 1 had grade 3 leukopenia and grade 4 neutropenia, but these toxicities were overcome within 3 days without support of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). At the level III dose, 90 mg/m2/week, 1 of 3 patients showed grade 4 leukopenia and 2 had grade 4 neutropenia, requiring support by G-CSF. Similarly, when using 100 mg/m2/week of paclitaxel, 2 out of 4 patients had more than grade 3 hematological toxicity. However, at levels II or IV, no non-hematological toxicity exceeding grade 2 was observed. Even if the weekly single paclitaxel was repeated, the toxicity did not seem to accumulate. According to dose-escalation, use of G-CSF and treatment delay were increased. The use of G-CSF was significantly (p<0.05) increased between levels I, II, III and IV. Although treatment with 90 or 100 mg/m2/week, at 3 weeks on, 1 off was tolerable and safe with support of G-CSF, these doses cannot be recommended for out-patients because of treatment delay. In this phase I trial, 80 mg/m2/week of paclitaxel was recommended as the phase II dose for outpatients.     

Phase I trial of escalating-dose irinotecan given weekly with cisplatin and concurrent radiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer.

PURPOSE: To identify the maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of weekly irinotecan combined with cisplatin and radiation in esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients with clinical stage II to III esophageal squamous cell or adenocarcinoma were treated on this phase I trial. Induction chemotherapy with weekly cisplatin 30 mg/m2 and irinotecan 65 mg/m2 was administered for four treatments during weeks 1 to 5. Radiotherapy was delivered weeks 8 to 13 in 1.8-Gy daily fractions to a dose of 50.4 Gy. Cisplatin 30 mg/m2 and escalating-dose irinotecan (40, 50, 65, and 80 mg/m2) were administered on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 of radiotherapy. DLT was defined as a 2-week delay in radiotherapy for grade 3 to 4 toxicity. RESULTS: Minimal toxicity was observed during chemoradiotherapy, with no grade 3 or 4 esophagitis, diarrhea, or stomatitis. DLT caused by myelosuppression was seen in two of six patients treated at the 80-mg/m2 dose level, thus irinotecan 65 mg/m2 was defined as the recommended phase II dose. Dysphagia improved or resolved after induction chemotherapy in 13 (81%) of 16 patients who reported dysphagia before therapy. Only one patient (5%) required a feeding tube. Six complete responses (32%) were observed, including four pathologic complete responses in 15 patients selected to undergo surgery (27%). CONCLUSION: Cisplatin, irinotecan, and concurrent radiotherapy can be administered on a convenient schedule with relatively minimal toxicity and an acceptable rate of complete response in esophageal cancer. Further phase II evaluation of this regimen is ongoing. A phase III comparison to fluorouracil or taxane-containing chemoradiotherapy should be considered.     

Phase I study of weekly alternating therapy with irinotecan/cisplatin and etoposide/cisplatin for patients with small-cell lung cancer

The combination of IP (irinotecan/cisplatin) has been shown to confer a survival benefit compared with EP (etoposide/cisplatin) in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Based on this and potential synergy from sequential inhibition of topoisomerases I and II, we conducted a phase I study to assess the feasibility of weekly therapy alternating IP and EP. The doses of EP were fixed (etoposide 60 mg/m2 on days 1-3 and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 on day 1). The dose of irinotecan was escalated in serial cohorts at 3 dose levels: 80, 90, and 100 mg/m2 on day 1. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given on days 2-5 and days 4-7 after IP and EP, respectively. Patients with limited-stage SCLC received chemoradiation during weeks 4-6 with etoposide 120 mg/m2 on days 1-3, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, and thoracic radiation 1.5 Gy twice daily in 30 fractions. Patients received 12 weeks of therapy. To evaluate dose escalation in subsequent cohorts, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was initially assessed during weeks 1-3 of treatment. Characteristics of the 18 patients accrued are as follows: performance status 0/1, n = 9; female sex, n = 9; extended-stage SCLC, n = 16; and median age, 53 years. Four patients treated at irinotecan dose level 1 (80 mg/m2), 6 patients at dose level 2 (90 mg/m2), and 6 patients at dose level 3 (100 mg/m2) did not experience DLT in weeks 1-4 and completed therapy without major incident. The only 2 patients to experience DLT during weeks 1-4 were treated at dose level 2. Both were hospitalized during week 4 and subsequently died. However, patients had already been accrued at dose level 3 and tolerated therapy well. Therefore, the trial design was modified to assess DLT during weeks 1-4, and additional patients were cautiously added to the dose level 2 and 3 cohorts. Analysis of summary toxicity data resulted in a recommendation that dose level 3 be used in phase II based on the probability of DLT of 16% (95% CI, 3%-29%). Responses in 16 evaluable patients include complete response in 1 patient, partial response in 14 patients, and minor response in 1 patient. With the exception of the 2 deaths, the therapy was well tolerated and active. Phase II evaluation of the regimen in patients with extensive-stage SCLC is ongoing.     

Phase I trial of strictly time-scheduled gemcitabine and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: Maximal therapeutic gain in xenograft sarcoma and toxicity for jejunal mucosa is time dependent for concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy (RT). We used a time-dependent schedule to determine the maximal-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; Grade 4 hematologic or Grade 3 other toxicity). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with pancreatic cancer (n = 33), periampullary carcinoma (n = 1), or bile duct cancer (n = 2) were treated with 3-day conformal RT with 50.4 Gy (tumor, lymphatics) plus a 5.4-Gy boost. Concurrent cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/d on Days 1-5 and 29-33) and gemcitabine (initially 600 mg/m(2), weekly on Fridays 68 h before RT) were administered. Because of DLT, the doses were reduced to 500 mg/m(2) weekly and then 500, 400, or 300 mg/m(2) on Days 2, 5, 26, 33. RESULTS: DLT occurred at all dose levels of gemcitabine >300 mg/m(2). Fourteen patients were treated at the recommended Phase II dose of gemcitabine (300 mg/m(2)) without DLT. The response to chemoradiation allowed 10 of 30 initially unresectable patients with primary pancreatic carcinoma to undergo radical surgery, including a complete response in 2 cases. CONCLUSIONS: At the recommended Phase II dose, chemoradiation with gemcitabine and cisplatin can be administered safely in pancreatic carcinoma. However, at higher dose levels, toxicity is severe and frequent. Patients with a chance for conversion to resection could benefit from this schedule.     

A phase I study of topotecan/paclitaxel alternating with etoposide/cisplatin and thoracic irradiation in patients with limited small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Topotecan and paclitaxel are promising cytotoxic drugs with novel mechanisms of action relative to other chemotherapies used in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In an effort to integrate paclitaxel and topotecan into the treatment of limited disease (LD) SCLC, we conducted a Phase I study of these agents administered as initial induction therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Escalating doses of topotecan (0.8-1.4 mg/m(2) d1-5) and paclitaxel (110-175 mg/m(2) d1) were administered i.v. every 21 days for two cycles to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in patients with LD SCLC. This was followed by two cycles of etoposide (120 mg/m(2) d1-3) and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) d1) with thoracic radiotherapy. The first 5 subjects received 1.8 Gy once daily x 25 fractions, while subsequent subjects received 1.5 Gy twice daily x 30 fractions. Two additional cycles of chemotherapy (topotecan and paclitaxel, followed by etoposide and cisplatin) were given. RESULTS: Common toxicities included grade >/=3 neutropenia in 67% of courses of topotecan and paclitaxel and grade >/=2 esophagitis in 71% of patients. The MTD was based on toxicity during the first two cycles of chemotherapy and defined after accrual of 18 patients to four dose levels. Two of three patients developed grade 3 nonhematological toxicity (pneumonia) at the fourth dose level. Thus, the third dose level (topotecan 1.2 mg/m(2), paclitaxel 160 mg/m(2)) was defined as the MTD recommended for Phase II studies. One subject died suddenly on day 2 of cycle 1 without autopsy confirmation of the etiology. A second subject died during cycle 3 due to thrombocytopenia, gastrointestinal bleeding, and respiratory failure. Response rates after induction of topotecan and paclitaxel: 16 of 18 (88.8%) partial response, 1 of 18 (5.5%) complete response. Response rates after completion of therapy: 10 of 18 (55.5%) partial response, 7 of 18 (38.8%) complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Induction topotecan and paclitaxel before chemoradiotherapy in patients with LD SCLC is feasible and results in expected toxicities. The outcome of a recently closed Cancer and Leukemia Group B Phase II study of similar design (CLB-39808) should help determine whether or not this approach warrants testing in a randomized setting.     

泰索帝每周给药联合顺铂一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究

目的确定泰索帝每周给药联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的最大耐受剂量（MTD）和剂量限制毒性（DLT）,观察其疗效（RR）和安全性,并进行药代动力学研究。方法泰索帝每周给药,连用3周,休息1周,顺铂每周期的第1天给药;每28d为1个治疗周期。顺铂的剂量为75mg／m^2。泰索帝在Ⅰ期临床阶段共有4个剂量组：25mg／m^2、30mg／m^2、35mg／m^2和40mg／m^2,每个剂量组至少人选3例患者。在Ⅱ期临床阶段,根据Ⅰ期临床推荐剂量,泰索帝35mg／m^2每周给药。药代动力学为第一周期第1天和第15天抽取血样待分析。根据Ⅰ期临床研究推荐剂量,进行Ⅱ期临床研究。结果Ⅰ期临床的15例患者中,有14例可评价疗效,其中5例部分缓解,有效率为35．7％,其中位生存时间16个月（范围5-40个月）。1、2、3年生存率分别为73．3％、26．6％和20．0％。中位疾病进展时间9个月（6～14个月）。Ⅱ期临床研究的83例初治的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者共接受了216个周期的化疗,可评价者75例。有1例患者完全缓解,22例患者部分缓解,占全部人组病例的27．7％（23／83）,占可评价病例的30．7％（23／75）;其中位生存时间为10．7个月（范围3—34个月）,1年生存率为48．6％。主要不良反应为Ⅲ-Ⅳ度的粒细胞减少以及乏力、指甲毒性及液体潴留。结论泰索帝（35mg／m^2）每周给药联合顺铂（75mg／m^2）作为一线方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌,疗效较好,骨髓毒性较小。