Combined biofeedback, physiotherapy and electrostimulation for fecal incontinence

Different outcomes are reported in the literature following pelvic floor rehabilitation for fecal incontinence, possibly due to the type of procedure employed, whether biofeedback or physiotherapy or electrostimulation. The aim of the present study is to analyze the results achieved in a group of patients treated with a combination of the three procedures. Thirty-two patients (24 females) affected by fecal incontinence underwent a course of combined rehabilitation (CR); 23 of them had anal surgery prior to CR, for rectal mucosal prolapse and hemorrhoids in most cases. Eighteen had anal manometry before and after CR. Sixteen underwent anal ultrasound prior to treatment. Patients were taught perineal exercises, biofeedback was either sensory or electromyographic, and electrostimulation was performed with a 10–20 MHz endoanal probe. Twenty-seven patients were available for follow-up. The mean incontinence score improved from 4.0±0.8 to 2.1±1.7 (mean±sd) (p<0.001); 19 patients (70%) were satisfied after CR, and 11 (44%) were fully continent. Post-treatment manometry showed an increased amplitude of squeeze pressure in 50% of the cases, whereas 61% had an increase in duration, but only 27% of them had a positive clinical outcome. Rectal evacuation thresholds improved in 55% of the cases and 86% of them had a corresponding positive clinical outcome. At ultrasound, 6 patients showed intact anal sphincters and had a positive outcome following CR. Pelvic floor rehabilitation seems to be effective for the management of fecal incontinence when carried out combining different types of procedures. No significant correlation was found between manometric and clinical response to the treatment. An increase of rectal sensation may be responsible for the clinical improvement. Received: 25 August 2000 / Accepted in revised form: 20 October 2000     

Investigating and treating fecal incontinence: When and how

Fecal incontinence is a common disorder in our aging population and can have profound effects on patient’s well-being. The present review examines the current understanding of fecal incontinence and provides a practical approach to the investigation and management of this condition. A special emphasis is placed on specialized testing, focusing on indications and impact on guiding management.     

生物反馈治疗大便失禁的疗效评价

目的　评价生物反馈方法治疗大便失禁患者的疗效。方法　对 2 6例大便失禁患者进行生物反馈治疗 ,治疗前后分别做肛肠测压和肌电图检查 ,评价患者的肛门功能。结果　 2 6例患者肛管最大收缩压、收缩肌电振幅、持续收缩时间、直肠感觉阈值和感觉收缩时间治疗前、后均有显著差异 (P <0 .0 1)。结论　生物反馈治疗大便失禁有效     

Open study of low-dose amitriptyline in the treatment of patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence

INTRODUCTION: Amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant agent with anticholinergic and serotoninergic properties, has been used empirically in the treatment of idiopathic fecal incontinence with good results. METHODS: An open study was conducted to test the response to amitriptyline 20 mg daily for four weeks by 18 patients (2 males) of median age 66 years with idiopathic fecal incontinence. Incontinence scores, number of bowel movements, computerized ambulatory anorectal pressures, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies were evaluated before and after four weeks of therapy. Twenty-four control subjects (10 males) of median age 61 years were also assessed. RESULTS: Amitriptyline improved incontinence scores (median pretreatment score=16vs. median posttreatment score=3;P<0.001) and reduced the number of bowel movements per day (P<0.001). Amitriptyline also decreased the frequency (median pretreatment frequency=4.5 per hourvs. median immediate posttreatment frequency=1.2 per hour (P<0.05); control median frequency=0.3 per hour) and the amplitude of rectal motor complexes (median pretreatment rectal pressure=94 cm H₂Ovs. median immediate posttreatment rectal pressure=58 cm H₂O (P<0.05); control median rectal pressure=36 cm H₂O) and improved anal pressures during these events (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Amitriptyline improved symptoms in 89 percent of patients with fecal incontinence. The data support that the major change with amitriptyline is a decrease in the amplitude and frequency of rectal motor complexes. The second conclusion is that drug increases colonic transit time and leads to the formation of a firmer stool that is passed less frequently. These in combination may be the source of the improvement in continence.Presented at the European Council of Coloproctology Biennial Meeting, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, June 17 to 19, 1997. Published in abstract form in theInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease 1997;12:143.     

Age and sex and anorectal manometry in incontinence

Although the prevalence of fecal incontinence is greater in women compared with men and in elderly subjects compared with younger subjects, data regarding the influence of age and sex on anorectal performance in continent and incontinent patients are conflicting. The authors, therefore, investigated age-and gender-related changes in anal resting and squeeze pressure as well as in sphincter relaxation after rectal balloon distention in 75 patients with fecal incontinence of different pathogenesis and in 99 continent patients by multichannel anorectal manometry. As a group, incontinent patients usually exhibit lower pressure profiles than do continent patients regardless of age and gender; however, both the resting pressure of the internal anal sphincter and the voluntary contractile pressure of the external anal sphincter are decreased with age, and both are lowered in women compared with men. Sphincter relaxation and perception of gastrointestinal events are not altered in incontinent patients, and they are not different between men and women or between elderly and younger patients. Supported by grant Er 142/1 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.     

Radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal for the treatment of fecal incontinence

PURPOSE: In this prospective study we investigated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of radio-frequency energy delivery deep to the mucosa of the anal canal for the treatment of fecal incontinence. METHODS: We studied ten patients with fecal incontinence of varying causes. All patients underwent anoscopy, anorectal manometry, endorectal ultrasound, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing at baseline and six months. The Cleveland Clinic Florida scale for fecal incontinence (Wexner, 0–20), fecal incontinence-related quality of life score, and Short Form 36 were administered at baseline, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months. Using conscious sedation and local anesthesia, we delivered temperature-controlled radio-frequency energy via an anoscopic device with multiple needle electrodes to create thermal lesions deep to the mucosa of the anal canal. RESULTS: Ten females (age, 55.9 ± 9.2 years; range, 44–74) were enrolled and treated. Median discomfort by visual analog scale (0–10) was 3.8 during and 0.9 two hours after the procedure. Bleeding occurred in four patients (14–21 days after procedure), spontaneous resolution (n = 3) and anoscopic suture ligation (n = 1). At 12 months, the median Wexner score improved from 13.5 to 5 (P < 0.001), with 80 percent of patients considered responders. All parameters in the fecal incontinence-related quality of life were improved (lifestyle (from 2.3 to 3.4), coping (from 1.4 to 2.7), depression (from 2.2 to 3.5), and embarrassment (from 1.3 to 2.8); P < 0.05 for all parameters). Protective pad use was eliminated in five of the seven baseline users. At six months, there was a significant reduction in both initial and maximum tolerable rectal distention volumes. Anoscopy was normal at six months. CONCLUSION: Radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal for treatment of fecal incontinence is a new modality that, in this study group, safely improved Wexner and fecal incontinence-related quality of life scores, eliminated protective pad use in most patients, and improved patient quality of life.     

Rectal tone and compliance affected in patients with fecal incontinence after fistulotomy

AIM: To investigate the anal sphincter and rectal factors that may be involved in fecal incontinence that develops following fistulotomy(FIAF).METHODS: Eleven patients with FIAF were compared with 11 patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence and with 11 asymptomatic healthy subjects(HS). All of the study participants underwent anorectal manometry and a barostat study(rectal sensitivity, tone, compliance and capacity). The mean time since surgery was 28 ± 26 mo. The postoperative continence score was 14 ± 2.5(95%CI: 12.4-15.5, St Mark's fecal incontinence grading system).RESULTS: Compared with the HS, the FIAF patients showed increased rectal tone(42.63 ± 27.69 vs 103.5 ± 51.13, P = 0.002) and less rectal compliance(4.95 ± 3.43 vs 11.77 ± 6.9, P = 0.009). No significant differences were found between the FIAF patients and the HS with respect to the rectal capacity; thresholds for the non-noxious stimuli of first sensation, gas sensation and urge-to-defecate sensation or the noxious stimulus of pain; anal resting pressure or squeeze pressure; or the frequency or percentage of relaxation of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex. No significant differences were found between the FIAF patients and the patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence.CONCLUSION: In patients with FIAF, normal motor anal sphincter function and rectal sensitivity are preserved, but rectal tone and compliance are impaired. The results suggest that FIAF is not due to alterations in rectal sensitivity and that the rectum is more involved than the anal sphincters in the genesis of FIAF.     

Anorectal pressure gradient and rectal compliance in fecal incontinence

To study whether anorectal pressure gradients discriminated better than standard anal manometry between patients with fecal incontinence and subjects with normal anal function, anorectal pressure gradients were measured during rectal compliance measurements in 36 patients with fecal incontinence and in 22 control subjects. Anal and rectal pressures were measured simultaneously during the rectal compliance measurements. With standard anal manometry, 75% of patients with fecal incontinence had maximal resting pressure within the normal range, and 39% had maximum squeeze pressure within the normal range. Anorectal pressure gradients did not discriminate better between fecal incontinence and normal anal function, since, depending on the parameters used, 61%–100% of the incontinent patients had anorectal pressure gradients within the normal range. Patients with fecal incontinence had lower rectal volumes than controls at constant defecation urge (median 138 ml and 181 ml, P<0.05) and at maximal tolerable volume (median 185 ml and 217 ml, P<0.05). We conclude that measurements of anorectal pressure gradients offer no advantage over standard anal manometry when comparing patients with fecal incontinence to controls. Patients with fecal incontinence have a lower rectal volume tolerability than control subjects with normal anal function. Accepted: 5 June 1998     

Postoperative anal canal length predicts outcome in patients having sphincter repair for fecal incontinence

PURPOSE: Controversy exists in regard to the prognostic value of clinical data and physiological tests in patients undergoing sphincter repair for fecal incontinence. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors. METHODS: Between 1986 and 1996, 405 consecutive patients had a sphincter repair for fecal incontinence. Preoperative and postoperative manometric data were available on 51 of these patients, and these patients' charts were reviewed retrospectively. Preoperative and postoperative continence was scored using the four-level scale of Browning and Parks. Mean follow-up was 16.2 (median, 6; range, 1–96) months. Mean age was 41 (median, 36; range, 21–80) years, and 46 (90 percent) patients were female. RESULTS: Twenty-three (45 percent) patients had perfect continence postoperatively, whereas 41 (80 percent) patients demonstrated improvement in continence score after sphincter repair. Using univariate analysis, various clinical and anal physiologic data were analyzed for an association with postoperative continence score. Postoperative mean resting pressure and postoperative anal canal length were both significantly related to postoperative continence (r _s ^B for Spearman correlation coefficient to differentiate from r for the Pearson coefficient. =0.442;P=0.0012; andr _s=0.440;P=0.0012, respectively), whereas postoperative mean squeeze pressure was not (r _s=0.273;P=0.0529). Postoperative mean resting pressure and anal canal length were entered into a logistic regression model. Postoperative mean resting pressure was not significant (P=0.6643), and when it was dropped from the model, postoperative anal canal length was highly significant (estimated odds ratio, 3.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1–9.3;P=0.0047) in predicting postoperative continence. CONCLUSIONS: No preoperative data predicted functional outcome, and in contrast to other studies, postoperative anal canal length provides the best prediction of postoperative continence.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Antonio, Texas, May 2 to 7, 1998.     

Measurement of the anorectal angle by defecography for the diagnosis of fecal incontinence

We assessed the reliability of anorectal angle (ARA) measurement as an index of fecal incontinence. The “posterior” ARA was measured at rest, squeezing, and straining in 69 continent and 82 incontinent subjects all complaining of various evacuation dysfunctions. The two groups were homogeneous with regard to sex distribution (48.6% vs. 51.4% men and 44.7% vs. 55.3% women, n.s.) and age (56.5±10.2 vs. 59.3±9.7 years, n.s.). The incidence of rectal prolapse was the same in the two groups (40 each). The intraobserver agreement index from two independent measurements (Pearson's correlation coefficient), age, and gender interaction [T ² Hotelling test in multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA)] and the most discriminating category of ARA measurement (Fisher's F test in ANOVA) were calculated. In addition, the relationship between ARA and severity of incontinence was assessed by the eta coefficient. Pearson's correlation coefficient was between 0.78 and 0.98 (P<0.01). The mean ARA differed significantly between the continent and incontinent subjects (104.5±10.3° vs. 116.2±23.6° at rest, 84.5±14.2° vs. 95.1±20.1° on squeezing, and 133.7±21.7° vs. 141.7 ± 25.9° on straining; T ² 0.066, P<0.05 in multivariate ANOVA). No interaction was noted between groups and gender (T ² = 0.023; F = 1.11, n.s.). Resting ARA was shown by ANOVA to be the most discriminating index (F = 9.4 P<0.01) between the two groups. Overall, ARA measurement was correlated with the severity of fecal incontinence (eta coefficient: 0.894 at rest; 0.811 on squeezing; 0.695 on straining); its accuracy was 79%, the false-positive rate was 15.3% and the false-negative rate 26.5%. Irrespective of the underlying abnormality, namely rectal prolapse, ARA measurement by defecography can: (a) be reinterpreted reliably by the same observer and (b) differentiate continent from incontinent subjects. Accepted: 25 February 1999     

A novel magnetic device to prevent fecal incontinence (preliminary study)

Background and aims In this research we propose an original magnetic device to strengthen the hypo-atonic anal sphincter and prevent fecal incontinence. Methods The device consists in a couple of small magnetic plaques to be surgically inserted in the wall of the anal canal between the external and internal anal sphincters with the opposite polarities face to face, so that, attracting themselves, close the anal lumen. Three couples of magnets made of materials of different magnetic force (neodymium > ferrite > plastoferrite) were evaluated in each of three swine anatomical preparations by measuring the endoanal pressure with a manometric catheter, both before and after magnet implantation. The mean pressures obtained before and after magnet insertion were statistically compared with Student t test. Results The endoanal pressure after the insertion of neodymium magnets was 79.7 ± 13.1 (mean ± SD), after ferrite magnets was 42.1 ± 5.6 mmHg and after plastoferrite magnets was 21.6 ± 4.6 mmHg, all of them significantly higher than the pressure recorded in basal conditions (1.72 ± 0.71 mmHg). Conclusion This research demonstrated that the implantation of a couple of magnets in the wall of the anal canal is able to create a high pressure zone of a value sufficient to prevent fecal incontinence and that the strength of this “dynamic closure” can be modulated by using magnets of various attraction force, so allowing a “tailored correction” of the anal sphincter hypotension.     

Referral for anorectal function evaluation is indicated in 65% and beneficial in 92% of patients

AIM： To determine the indicated referrals to a tertiary centre for patients with anorectal symptoms, the effect of the advised treatment and the discomfort of the tests.
METHODS： In a retrospective study, patients referred for anorectal function evaluation （AFE） between May 2004 and October 2006 were sent a questionnaire, as were the doctors who referred them. AFE consisted of anal manometry, rectal compliance measurement and anal endosonography. An indicated referral was defined as needing AFE to establish a diagnosis with clinical consequence （fecal incontinence without diarrhea, 3^rd degree anal sphincter rupture, congenital anorectal disorder, inflammatory bowel disease with anorectal complaints and preoperative in patients for re-anastomosis or enterostoma, anal fissure, fistula or constipation）. Anal ultrasound is always indicated in patients with fistula, anal manometry and rectal compliance when impaired continence reserve is suspected. The therapeutic effect was noted as improvement, no improvement but reassurance, and deterioration. RESULTS： From the 216 patients referred, 167 （78%） returned the questionnaire. The referrals were indicated in 65%. Of these, 80% followed the proposed advice. Improvement was achieved in 35% and a reassurance in 57% of the patients, no difference existed between patient groups. On a VAS scale （1 to 10） symptoms improved from 4.0 to 7.2. Most patients reported no or little discomfort with AFE.
CONCLUSION： Referral for AFE was indicated in 65%. Beneficial effect was seen in 92%： 35% improved and 57% was reassured. Advice was followed in 80%. Better instruction about indication for AFE referral is warranted.     

Long-term results of electromyographic biofeedback training for fecal incontinence

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the long-term results of electromyographic biofeedback training in fecal incontinence. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (1 male) received a customised program of 2 to 11 (median, 3) biofeedback training sessions with an anal plug electromyometer. Nine patients had persistent incontinence after anal sphincter repair, a further 8 patients had postsurgical or partial obstetric damage of the sphincter but no sphincter repair, 9 patients had neurogenic sphincter damage, and 11 patients were classified as having idiopathic fecal incontinence. Duration of voluntary sphincter contraction was measured by anal electromyography (endurance score) before and after treatment. A postal questionnaire was used to investigate the following variables: 1) subjective rating on a four-grade Likert-scale of the overall result of the biofeedback training; 2) incontinence score (maximum score is 18, and 0 indicates no incontinence); and 3) rating of bowel dissatisfaction using a visual analog scale (0 to 10). RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (60 percent) rated the result as very good (n=8) or good (n=14) immediately after the treatment period. Median endurance score improved from 1 to 2 minutes (P<0.0001). Median incontinence score improved from 11 to 7, and bowel dissatisfaction rating improved from 5 to 2.8 (bothP<0.0001). After a median follow-up of 44 (range, 12–59) months, 15 patients (41 percent) still rated the overall result as very good (n=3) or good (n=12). The incontinence score did not change during follow-up. Median bowel dissatisfaction rating deteriorated from 2.8 to 4.2 but remained better than before treatment. Poor early subjective rating and the need for more than three biofeedback sessions were predictive of worsening during follow-up. CONCLUSION: We think it is encouraging that in this study biofeedback treatment for fecal incontinence with an intra-anal plug electrode resulted in a long-term success rate in nearly one-half of the patients.     

A pilot study of total pelvic floor repair or gluteus maximus transposition for postobstetric neuropathic fecal incontinence

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report pilot data comparing the morbidity and functional outcome of total pelvic floor repair with gluteus maximus transposition for women with postobstetric fecal incontinence. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized trial of two surgical procedures in 24 women so far. Functional assessment was performed with use of a 20-point clinical incontinence score and patient questionnaire before and after operation. The physiologic parameters, before and after operation, included resting and squeeze anal pressures, length of the high pressure zone, anal and rectal mucosal sensitivity, and pudendal nerve latency. RESULTS: So far, 12 patients have been treated by total pelvic floor repair and 12 by gluteus maximus transposition. Of these, three patients developed wound complications after gluteus maximus transposition compared with none after total pelvic floor repair. Among these cases there was a significant overall improvement in functional score (given as mean ± standard deviation) after both total pelvic floor repair (13.1±2.7vs. 6.6±4.5;P<0.001) and gluteus maximus transposition (13.8±3.8vs. 7.7±6.1;P<0.01), although no difference existed between the groups. There was no change in any of the physiologic measurements after either operation, and preoperative measurements did not identify patients likely to do badly. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude from these preliminary data that both total pelvic floor repair and gluteus maximus transposition significantly improve continence in women with postobstetric neuropathic fecal incontinence. Gluteus maximus transposition gives equivalent results to total pelvic floor repair. Neither procedure has any influence on anorectal physiologic parameters.Preliminary results presented at the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, Glasgow, Scotland, April 9 to 11, 1997.     

Fecal incontinence after minor anorectal surgery

PURPOSE: Fecal leakage after open lateral internal anal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure is common, but underreported. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the physiologic and morphologic effects of sphincterotomy, comparing continent and incontinent patients after surgery. This group was further compared with an unselected group of patients presenting with incontinence after hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS: Between January 1997 and June 1999, 23 patients were prospectively followed up through internal sphincterotomy with conventional and vector volume anorectal manometry, parametric assessment of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex, and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging. Fourteen continent patients were compared with 9 incontinent postoperative cases, 9 patients referred with incontinence after hemorrhoidectomy, and 33 healthy volunteers without anorectal disease. RESULTS: Significant differences were noted between continent and incontinent postsphincterotomy cases for all resting conventional and vector volume parameters and for some squeeze parameters. Although there was a significant reduction in postoperative high pressure zone length at rest, there were no differences between the postoperative groups. There was an increase in sphincter asymmetry of 6.7 percent (± 3.5 percent) in incontinent postsphincterotomy patients and a decrease of 2.8 percent (± 3.2 percent) in continent cases. Significant differences were noted for resting parameters between incontinent postsphincterotomy and posthemorrhoidectomy patients, with a higher resting sphincter asymmetry in the latter group. The area under the rectoanal inhibitory curve was smaller in postsphincterotomy incontinent patients when compared with continent cohorts over the distal and intermediate sphincter zones at rest with a reduced latency of inhibition. There was no difference in the magnetic resonance images of the sphincterotomy site between incontinent and continent postsphincterotomy cases and no posthemorrhoidectomy case had evidence of sphincteric damage. CONCLUSION: There are complex significant differences in the postoperative physiology of patients undergoing lateral internal sphincterotomy who become incontinent when compared with those who maintain continence. These physiologic changes are not reflected in detectable morphologic sphincteric differences. It is unknown whether these changes predict for long-term incontinence, and it is suggested that postoperative incontinence after minor anorectal surgery is not necessarily related either to a preexisting sphincter defect or inadvertent intraoperative sphincter injury.This work was performed at the Hammersmith Hospital London Imperial College School of Science Technology and Medicine. Presented at the Section of Coloproctology at the Royal Society of Medicine, London, United Kingdom, March 22, 2000, at the Annual Meeting of the Israeli Society of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Nazareth, Israel, September 24 to 27, 2000, and as a poster at the Congress of the European Council of Coloproctology, Prague, Czech Republic, April 29 to May 2, 2001 (winner of the poster prize).     

Customized biofeedback therapy improves results in fecal incontinence

Background and aims Biofeedback therapy has been extensively used and accepted in fecal incontinence, but reports of its efficiency vary. We evaluated feedback therapy efficiency when (a) selecting the patients subject of the therapy, and (b) customizing the therapy protocol used for each patient.Patients and methods Fifty-three patients with fecal incontinence were selected for biofeedback training. The treatment program was customized for each patient depending on the underlying dysfunction, the patients cooperative and learning attitude, and the patients progress. Biofeedback efficiency was measured using clinical scores, subjective satisfaction of the patient, and manometry.Results Incontinent scores showed improvement in 66% of patients and good improvement in 11% and 15%, respectively, indicating an overall excellent effect of the therapy. Subjective satisfaction was strongly correlated with the previous incontinent scores. Comparison of manometry parameters before and after biofeedback therapy, including maximum anal resting, maximum anal squeeze pressure, and maximum duration of the squeeze, all showed significant differences. In addition, the sensory threshold significantly decreased after biofeedback therapy. Clinical improvements were maintained during the following 12 months.Conclusion Biofeedback improves objective and subjective parameters of anorectal function. Selection of patients and customization of the therapy program increased biofeedback efficiency for the treatment of fecal incontinence.     

Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence

Obstructed defecation (OD) and fecal incontinence (FI) are challenging clinical problems, which are commonly encountered in the practice of colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists. These disorders socially and psychologically distress patients and greatly impair their quality of life. The underlying anatomical and pathophysiological changes are complex, often incompletely understood and cannot always be determined. As a consequence, many medical, surgical, and behavioral approaches have been described, with no panacea. Over the past decade, advances in an understanding of these disorders together with rational and similar methods of evaluation in anorectal physiology laboratories (ARP), radiology studies, and new surgical techniques have led to promising results. In this brief review, we discuss treatment strategies and recent updates on clinical and therapeutic aspects of obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence.     

Cumulative index,volumes 21–25 1978–1982

The results after gracilis muscle transposition were studied in ten patients with a follow-up of six months to 17 years. Nine patients were continent for formed feces and the condition of one patient worsened after operation. Anorectal manometry was performed in eight of the ten patients. Evaluation of pressure recordings showed a normal image, both at rest and at maximal squeeze, in five patients. Low-pressure recordings at rest and at maximal squeeze were seen in two continent patients, in whom the tissue scarring resulted in narrowing of the anal canal. One patient with low-pressure recordings was completely incontinent. An attempt was made to explain the continence and low-pressure recordings. The results suggest gracilis muscle transposition to be a method of choice in patients with total incontinence who have no functional anal sphincter.     

Electrostimulation in fecal incontinence

PURPOSE: Continence scores and anal manometry are commonly used to assess the effect of electrostimulation in fecal incontinence. This study determined the increase of muscular compound potentials in electroneurography of the pudendal nerve after three months of electrostimulation treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty women were tested; their average age was 46.8 (standard deviation, 9.82) years. Electrostimulation was applied twice daily for 15 minutes in each case. RESULTS: Before treatment, amplitudes were, on average, 0.54 mV (standard deviation, 0.2). After three months of electrostimulation, the amplitudes had increased to 0.84 mV (standard deviation, 0.2). The continence score was improved from 8.73 to 7.1 points. CONCLUSION: We believe that by electrostimulation the atrophic muscle can be trained to stabilize the pelvic floor, thus increasing anal pressure and, thereby, creating a basis for adequate voluntary contraction. Electrostimulation is, therefore, especially suitable for functional deficits of the external anal sphincter (insufficient voluntary contractions because of atrophic muscle) without identifiable muscular lesion.     

Implantation of microballoons in the management of fecal incontinence

PURPOSE: The implantation of expandable microballoons has proved successful for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. This led us to test its effectiveness in the treatment of severe fecal incontinence. METHODS: Six patients (four male), of average age of 43 (range, 29–60) years, with severe fecal incontinence, underwent implantation of expandable microballoons in the submucosa of the anal canal. The implantation was performed under intravenous sedation as an outpatient procedure. Anal manometry, endosonography, and incontinence assessment with a scoring system were performed before and after the implantation. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 8.6 (range, 7–12) months, the incontinence scores improved in all patients from an average of 16.16 (standard deviation: ± 1.6) before the implantation to an average of 5 (standard deviation: ± 1.26) after the procedure. The anal pressure at rest was not improved in any patient (mean: 50.16 before treatment to a mean of 53 after treatment). No significant adverse events were associated with the procedure, and no serious postim-plantation complications were noted. DISCUSSION: Anal implantation of expandable microballoons seems to be a simple, safe, and effective method that restores the fecal continence without hindering normal defecation.Presented at the Digestive Disease Week, Atlanta, Georgia, May 20 to 23, 2001.