Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians: myth or reality?

AIM: We studied the thirty-day mortality and morbidity rate to assess the value of conventional open repair vs endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in an elderly population presenting with a ruptured, symptomatic or asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) undergoing emergency, urgent or elective repair. METHODS: During the period from January 2004 to May 2007, 329 consecutive patients were treated for AAA in our Department. Among these, 81 (24.6%) were aged >80 years (mean age 83.6, range 80-95 years). These older patients were divided into groups according to their clinical presentation: ruptured AAA group (rAAA) - 22 cases (4 emergency EVAR, 18 emergency open repair); symptomatic non-ruptured AAA group (sAAA) - 15 cases (11 urgent EVAR, 4 urgent open repair); asymptomatic AAA group (asAAA) - 44 cases (32 elective EVAR, 12 elective open repair). The main outcome measures were 30-day mortality and 30-day morbidity rate. RESULTS: The mortality rate following open surgery vs EVAR was 66.6% vs 50% (P=NS) in the rAAA group, 25% vs 0% (P=NS) in the sAAA group, and 9% vs 3.2% (P=NS) in the asAAA group. When comparing postoperative morbidities in the octogenarians, 3 of the patients that received EVAR (6.4%) and 15 of those that received open repair (48.4%) had a severe complication (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The introduction of EVAR has considerably changed the balance of risks and benefits for AAA treatment. Our study confirms the high mortality rate for octogenarians with rAAA and haemodynamic instability, and supports the value of an active EVAR approach for octogenarians with AAA to prevent rupture. Moreover, the introduction of endovascular techniques as part of an overall treatment algorithm for ruptured AAAs appears to be potentially associated with improved outcomes in terms of mortality and morbidity as compared to open surgical repairs alone.     

Operative treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms in octogenarians. When is it too much too late?

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the value of operation for treatment of all octogenarians with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Elective AAA resection in octogenarians is safe, with published operative mortality rates of approximately 5%. Published operative mortality rates of ruptured AAA in this age group, however, vary from 27 to 92%. METHODS: To evaluate this question, we extracted the clinical course of the 34 octogenarians submitted to AAA resection by the authors from our total experience of 548 resections performed during the past 7 1/2 years. In this subgroup of octogenarians, 18 underwent elective AAA replacement, 5 were submitted to urgent resection of active but intact AAAs, and 11 had operations for ruptured AAAs. There were 23 males and 11 females in the group. The ages ranged from 80 to 91 years. RESULTS: Operative mortality in the patients managed electively was 5.6%. Two of the five patients (40%) submitted to operation for active yet unruptured aneurysms died in the preoperative period. Finally, 10 of the 11 patients (91%) with ruptured AAAs were operative mortalities. All of these operative mortalities in the ruptured AAA subgroup had severe hypotension preoperatively (mean systolic blood pressure: 23 mm Hg). The charges associated with the management of the ruptured AAA group averaged $84,486 (range $12,537-$199,233). CONCLUSIONS: Although elective replacement of AAA in properly selected octogenarians appears valuable to prolong worthwhile life expectancy, this experience leads us to consider observation only in the treatment of octogenarians with ruptured AAA who present with severe hemodynamic instability.     

Epidemiological study of the relationship between volume and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in the UK from 2000 to 2005

BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess the relationship between hospital volume and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery in the UK. METHODS: Hospital Episode Statistics (2000-2005) were classified as elective, urgent or ruptured AAA repair. Analysis was by modelling of mortality rate, complication rate and length of hospital stay with regard to the annual operative volume, after risk adjustment. RESULTS: There were 112,545 diagnoses, or repairs, of AAAs, of which 26,822 were infrarenal aneurysms. The mean mortality rate was 7.4, 23.6 and 41.8 per cent for elective, urgent and ruptured AAA repair respectively. Elective AAA repair undertaken at high-volume hospitals showed volume-related improvements in mortality (P < 0.001). Patients were discharged from hospital earlier (P < 0.001). The critical volume threshold was 32 elective AAA repairs per year. For urgent repair, patients at high-volume hospitals had a reduced mortality rate (P = 0.017) with an increased length of stay (P = 0.041). There was no relationship between volume and outcome for ruptured AAA repairs. CONCLUSION: Increased annual volumes were associated with significant reductions in mortality for elective and urgent AAA repair, but not for repair of ruptured AAAs.     

To what extent has endovascular aneurysm repair influenced abdominal aortic aneurysm management in the state of Illinois?

PURPOSE: This study was performed using population-based data to determine the changing trends in the techniques for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in the state of Illinois during the past 9 years and to examine the extent to which endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has influenced overall AAA management. METHODS: All records of patients who underwent AAA repair (1995 to 2003 inclusive) were retrieved from the Illinois Hospital Association COMPdata database. The outcome as determined by in-hospital mortality was analyzed according to intervention type (open vs EVAR) and indication (elective repair vs ruptured AAA). Data were stratified by age, gender, and hospital type (university vs community setting) and then analyzed using both univariate (chi 2 , t tests) and multivariate (stepwise logistic regression) techniques. RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2003, 14,517 patients underwent AAA repair (85% for elective and 15% for ruptured AAA). The average age was 71.4 +/- 7.9 years, and 76% were men. For elective cases, open repair was performed in 86% and EVAR in 14%; and for ruptured cases, open repair in 97% and EVAR in 3%. Elective EVAR was associated with lower in-hospital mortality compared with open repair regardless of age. No differences were observed with age after either type of repair for a ruptured aneurysm. Men had a lower in-hospital mortality compared with women for open repair of both elective and ruptured aneurysms. For EVAR, the mortality of an elective repair was lower in men, but there was no difference after a ruptured AAA. In men, the difference in mortality between elective open repair and EVAR was significant; the type of institution did not influence outcome. Patients >80 years of age had a higher mortality after open repair for both elective and ruptured AAA and after EVAR of a ruptured AAA. The average length of stay was 9.9 days for open elective repair, 13.1 days after open repair of a ruptured AAA, and 3.6 days for EVAR. The independent predictors of higher in-hospital mortality were female gender, age >80 years, diagnosis (ruptured vs open), and procedure (open vs EVAR). The year of the procedure and type of hospital (university vs community) were not predictive of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR has had a significant impact on AAA management in Illinois over a relatively short time period. In this population-based review, EVAR was associated with a significantly decreased in-hospital mortality and length of stay. Octogenarians had higher mortality after both types of repair, with the exception of elective EVAR.     

Long-Term Survival and Quality of Life After Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Background

Open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) generally involves postsurgery admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Few studies have evaluated the impact of surgery for either ruptured or nonruptured AAA (with postoperative ICU treatment) on long-term survival and quality of life. The primary aim of this study was to quantify long-term survival and health-related quality of life (HrQpL) of a cohort of patients undergoing open AAA repair after hospital discharge.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing open elective or acute AAA reconstruction with postoperative admission to the ICU and discharged alive from the hospital during 2009 were identified. Primary outcome measures were 1-year and long-term mortality. The secondary outcome was the HrQoL using the EuroQol-6D (EQ-6D) questionnaire at the end of the follow-up period.

Results

A total of 263 patients were treated and postoperatively discharged alive: 56 had a ruptured AAA (rAAA), 35 a symptomatic AAA, and 172 an asymptomatic AAA. The 1-year mortality after open AAA repair was 8 %. Overall, 39 % of patients died within 10 postoperative years (mean 6.0 ± 2.8 years). Long-term survival of patients with a ruptured or symptomatic aneurysm was similar to that of patients undergoing elective aneurysm repair. Long-term HrQoL of the total study population was worse than that of an age-matched general Dutch population on the EQ-us (range 0–1, difference 0.12). This decrease in HrQoL was mainly seen in mobility, self-care, usual activities, and cognition.

Conclusions

Ten years after open AAA repair, the overall survival rate was 59 %. Long-term survival and HrQoL were similar for patients with a repaired ruptured or symptomatic aneurysm and those who underwent elective aneurysm repair. There were also no differences in patients with infrarenal versus juxtarenal/suprarenal aneurysms. Surviving patients had a lower HrQoL than the age-matched general Dutch population, especially regarding mobility, self-care, usual activities, and cognition.     

Quality of life following surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) carries a considerable rate of morbidity and mortality, but little information exists on the quality of life following this procedure. During 1988 and 1989, in two hospitals, 211 patients (186 men and 25 women; median age 74 (range 48-87) years) underwent surgery for AAA. There were 77 ruptured aneurysms and 134 electively repaired. Of these, 38 patients died in hospital (27 ruptured, 11 elective); by the time of review a further eight (one ruptured, seven elective) had died from unrelated causes. Of the 165 survivors, 131 (45 ruptured, 86 elective) were reviewed and questioned as to their physical and mental state before and after surgery. Using the Rosser index, a value for quality of life before and after surgery was calculated (1.0, good; 0, dead). The value for the elective group was 0.94 before operation and 0.96 after, but in the ruptured group fell from 0.98 before surgery to 0.87 afterwards. This study shows that patients undergoing elective surgery for repair of AAA retain good quality of life. By contrast, patients surviving emergency surgery following this procedure seem to suffer a deterioration in life quality, which must be endured for the same expected lifetime as that for the elective group. These results support the need for a national AAA ultrasonographic screening programme.     

Initial experience of abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs in Borneo

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) repairs are routineoperations with low mortality in the developed world. There arefew studies on the operative management of AAA in the Asian population.This study reports the initial results from a unit with no previousexperience in this surgery by a single surgeon on completion oftraining. Methods: All patients with AAA repair from a prospective databasebetween 1996 and 1999 in the south‐east Asian state of Sarawak inBorneo Island were analyzed. Three groups were identified on presentationaccording to clinical urgency of surgery. Elective surgery was offeredto all good risk patients with AAA of ≥ 5 cm.All symptomatic patients were offered surgery unless contraindicatedmedically. Results: AAA repairs were performed in 69 patients: 32 (46%)had elective repairs of asymptomatic AAA; 20 (29%) hadurgent surgery for symptomatic non‐ruptured AAA; and 17 (25%)had surgery for ruptured AAA. The mortality rate for elective surgery was6%; the two deaths occurred early in the series with thesubsequent 25 repairs recorded no further mortality. The mortalityrates for the urgent, symptomatic non‐ruptured AAA repair and rupturedAAA repair were 20% and 35%, respectively. Cardiacand res­piratory complications were the main morbidities.Sixty‐three patients seen during this period had no surgery; threepresented and died of ruptured AAA, 34 had AAA of ≤ 5 cmin diameter, and 26 with AAA of ≥ 5 cmdiameter had either no consent for surgery or serious medical contraindications. Conclusion: This study showed that AAA can be repaired safely byhighly motivated and adequately trained surgeons in a hospital withlittle previous experience.     

The epidemiology of surgically repaired aneurysms in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the results of surgery for hospitalized cases of aneurysms in the United States, thereby providing a standard of comparison for new techniques proposed to treat aneurysms. METHODS: Data on hospitalized aneurysm cases were collected from the National Hospital Discharge Survey, a comprehensive database of patients hospitalized in the United States for treatment from the years 1984 to 1994. The National Hospital Discharge Survey samples non-federal, acute-care hospitals with an average length of stay of less than 30 days. All the cases had a diagnosis of or a surgical procedure for a non-cerebral aneurysm. RESULTS: In the year 1994, 51,949 non-cerebral aneurysms were repaired in the United States, and 75% of these procedures were abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgeries. The operative mortality rates for AAA were higher than previously reported from multi-institutional studies and were found to be 8.4% for elective repair and 68% for emergency AAA repair. The number of aneurysm surgeries per thousand population varied by region: surgery rates were more frequent in the Northeast and less frequent in the West. Surgical volume appeared to decrease for smaller hospitals and increase for larger hospitals for the period between 1990 and 1994. The overall mortality rates for all aneurysm surgeries diminished with hospital size. However, no significant difference was found for the rates of elective AAA repair between hospital sizes. The percentage of men with aneurysms who underwent surgery for repair was significantly higher than for women with aneurysms. In addition, the AAA repair rates increased for men from 1985 to 1994, and the number of women reported with repaired AAAs remained constant. CONCLUSION: The location of aneurysm, urgency of repair, region, sex, and hospital size are important factors related to patient treatment and outcome. These data provide a standard of comparison against which surgeons can compare their own results, and they provide a benchmark for the evaluation of interventional techniques proposed to treat aneurysms.     

Influence of presentation on outcome in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVES: In the absence of formal screening abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are detected in an opportunistic manner. Many remain asymptomatic and undetected until they rupture. Incidentally discovered small AAAs are entered into a surveillance programme until they reach a suitable size for repair. The aim of this study was to examine trends in the management of AAA and whether the method of presentation had an effect on subsequent mortality. DESIGN: Observational study in UK district general hospital. MATERIALS/METHODS: This study reports a single surgeon case series identified using a prospectively maintained database. Data on mode of presentation, management and mortality were retrieved from case notes, PIMS hospital database and the Office of National Statistics. RESULTS: Two hundred and five patients were referred with AAAs between 1992 and 2004, 78% presenting in elective circumstances. The surveillance programme fed 33% of the operated cases. Two aneurysms ruptured whilst under surveillance. Overall elective operative mortality was 11.8% and has progressively decreased over time. Thirty-day operated mortality was significantly lower in patients having a period of surveillance than those having immediate elective repair (2.3 vs. 16.3%, p=0.018). A slight reduction in emergency AAA repairs was noted over the study period (r2=0.6) although registered aneurysm deaths continue to increase (r2=0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Elective mortality following AAA surgery decreased over the study period. Outcome was better in those patients who had surgery for aneurysms that had been under surveillance. Despite opportunistic screening the population adjusted mortality rate of aortic aneurysms showed a progressive increase. A reduction in deaths from aneurysms is unlikely without a formal screening programme.     

The 30-day mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of gender, age, diameter and comorbidities

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of gender, age, the aneurysm diameter and comorbidity on the 30-day mortality after open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). METHODS: Between January 1, 1993, and December 31, 2006 all consecutive patients who underwent open repair for a ruptured AAA at the tertiary care of Catharina teaching Hospital were included in this study (N=186). Patients who underwent endovascular repair of their ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms were excluded from this study. Patient and procedure characteristics were collected and analyzed in relation to 30-day mortality. The association between age, gender, diameter of AAA and comorbidity with 30-day mortality was analyzed with c2 are and logistic regression; a P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In this study there were 186 patients with ruptured AAA repair with an 30-day mortality of 36.6% (68/186). Among female patient 30-day mortality was 45.8% (11/24) compared with 35.2% (57/162) among male patients (P=0.31). Patients of 80 years and older had a 61.3% (19/31) 30-day mortality where younger patients had 33% (51/155) 30-day mortality (P=0.02). Thirty-day mortality was 47.2% (17/36) for patients with an AAA less than 65 mm compared with 34% (36/104) for patients with an AAA of 65 mm or larger (P=0.16). Multivariate analysis demonstrated age was a significant predictor of ruptured AAA repair mortality (P=0.017). CONCLUSION: In this study, age was the only significant risk factor of 30-day mortality after open repair in patients with ruptured AAA.     

Clamp before you cut: Proximal control of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms using endovascular balloon occlusion--Case reports

While the mortality rate for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair has declined over the last several decades, the rate for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) has unfortunately remained disturbingly high. Undiagnosed aneurysms may present with little warning until abdominal pain, syncope, and hypotension signify rupture. Fifty percent of patients with ruptured aneurysms die before reaching a medical facility, and their survival is highly dependent on hemodynamic stability at presentation. The degree of rupture containment and comorbid status of the patient determine hemodynamic stability. Endovascular stent grafting has significantly improved perioperative morbidity and mortality rates for elective AAA repair, and some of the same endovascular techniques can be used to obtain proximal control in patients presenting with RAAA. We describe 3 consecutive cases of RAAA where proximal control was obtained using a percutaneously placed, transfemoral aortic occlusion balloon before induction of anesthesia.     

Emergency endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aneurysms--a feasibility study and report of 10 cases

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proved to be effective and safe in the elective management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Initial reports concerning endovascular management of ruptured aneurysms have been promising. OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcome of endovascular repair of ruptured aneurysms in the local setting. Materials and methods. Patients who presented with ruptured AAAs were considered for endovascular repair if they were haemodynamically stable and had suitable aneurysm morphology for EVAR. RESULTS: Ten patients (9 males, 1 female) with a mean age of 74.9 years were treated. All aneurysms were successfully excluded using aorta uni-iliac stent grafts in 7 patients and bifurcated stent grafts in 2 patients. In 1 patient who had had a previous EVAR, a proximal extension device was used. Two patients died in the peri-operative period (30-day mortality of 20%) and 1 patient died after 2 months. Seven patients are still alive. No endo-leaks occurred in any of the survivors. CONCLUSION: Endovascular repair of ruptured AAAs is feasible with acceptable peri-operative mortality and short- to medium-term results.     

Koinzidenz eines Bauchaortenaneurysmas mit Pathologien viszeraler Hohlorgane

The management of patients suffering from abdominal aortic aneurysms with concomitant intestinal disease is demanding. Surgical procedures have to be evaluated meticulously with regard to morbidity and priority. We retrospectively investigated early and late results of nine patients (eight males, one female) with coincidental aortic and intestinal surgery during the last 9.5 years. The average age was 77 years (range 67-85). One-stage procedures were undertaken twice with implantation of aortic grafts to replace abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). During these emergency procedures, an aortoduodenal fistula was repaired in one case and resection of an ischemic segment of the sigmoid colon was resected in another. Seven two-stage procedures were performed as elective surgery. Five AAA were excluded before the intestinal repair. In two cases of urgent visceral pathologies, colon resection was done first, followed by elimination of the AAA. In case of elective surgery, two-stage procedures seem to be safe and effective. However, in certain emergent cases, one-stage procedures with implantation of vascular grafts in combination with colon or bowel surgery might also be justified.     

Meta-analysis and systematic review of the relationship between volume and outcome in abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the volume-outcome relationship for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery and quantified critical volume thresholds. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were searched for articles on the operation volume-outcome relationship in elective and ruptured AAA surgery. UK Hospital Episode Statistics data were also considered. Elective and ruptured AAA repairs were dealt with separately. The data were meta-analysed, and the odds ratios (95 per cent confidence interval) for mortality at higher- and lower-volume hospitals were compared. Volume thresholds were identified from each paper. RESULTS: The analysis included 421,299 elective and 45,796 ruptured AAA operations. Significant relationships between mortality and annual volume were noted for both groups. Overall, the weighted odds ratio was 0.66 (0.65 to 0.67) for elective repair at a threshold of 43 AAAs per annum and 0.78 (0.73 to 0.82) for ruptured aneurysm repair at a threshold of 15 AAAs per annum, both in favour of high-volume institutions. CONCLUSION: Higher annual operation volumes are associated with significantly lower mortality in both elective and ruptured AAA repair. This suggests that AAA surgery should be performed only at higher-volume centres.     

Audit of 200 consecutive aortic aneurysm repairs carried out by a single surgeon in a district hospital: results of surgery and factors affecting outcome.

It has been suggested that surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) be confined to designated centres. A prospective audit of 200 consecutive AAA repairs at a district general hospital was performed between 1981 and 1990. The 30-day mortality rates for elective, symptomatic and ruptured aneurysm repair were 1.4%, 3.5% and 30%, respectively. The major factor affecting outcome after the mode of presentation was the age of the patient, with 30-day mortality rates for emergency treatment increasing from 21% (age range 60-69 years) to 42% (age range 70-79 years). This mortality rate for ruptured aneurysms is an underestimate, with two-thirds of patients with rupture dying before reaching hospital and some patients dying in hospital undiagnosed. The major contribution to improved overall mortality would therefore be detection before rupture (usually by ultrasound) and improved diagnostic accuracy. Many patients with ruptured aneurysms had symptoms for only a short period before presentation (42% for less than 6 h) and required urgent surgery (26% reached theatre within 1 h). These two factors make long-distance transfer of these patients an unrealistic option. The concentration of this type of surgery in relatively few centres will distance the patient from their relatives and reduce the opportunity for the majority of junior doctors to acquire an understanding of the presentation, natural history and management of aortic aneurysms. This understanding when combined with a screening programme is likely to have a far greater impact on the overall mortality from AAA than restricting the centres for surgical treatment.     

Payer status is related to differences in access and outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States

BACKGROUND: The hypothesis of this study was that differences exist among patients with private insurance compared with patients with Medicaid or no insurance, regarding access to the timely treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and the outcomes of AAA repair. METHODS: The study comprised 5363 patients aged less than 65 years (mean age, 59 years) with a diagnostic code for intact or ruptured AAA and a procedure code for AAA repair in the National Inpatient Sample for 1995 to 2000. Dependent variables included ruptured AAA, intact AAA, and in-hospital postoperative mortality rates. Independent variables included payer status, median income, race, gender, age, and comorbid disease. Risk-adjusted analyses were performed with the use of binary logistic regression. RESULTS: AAA rupture was most likely (P <.001) to affect patients with no insurance (36%) or Medicaid (18%), compared with patients with private insurance (13%). After an adjustment for case-mix had been made, data showed that patients without insurance had an increased risk of rupture compared with patients with private insurance (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.5-3.5; P <.001). Operative mortality rates after elective AAA repair were greater (P =.04) for patients with no insurance (2.6%) or Medicaid (2.7%), compared with patients with private insurance (1.2%). Similarly, operative mortality rates for AAA repair after rupture were greater (P =.001) in patients without insurance (45.3%) or Medicaid (31.3%), compared with patients with private insurance (26.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Uninsured patients more often seek treatment of ruptured AAAs compared with patients with private insurance. Operative mortality rates in uninsured patients are greater for elective and emergent AAA repair. These data support the tenet that payer status is associated with mortality rates after AAA repair.     

Epidemiology and Outcome of Aortic Aneurysms in Hong Kong

Abstract The objective of this study was to determine epidemiology and mortality statistics for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in Hong Kong. Data from three sources were obtained and analyzed: (1) Hong Kong Hospital Authority discharge statistics for 1999 and 2000; (2) a survey on aortic aneurysms in public hospitals conducted by the Working Group of Vascular Surgery; and (3) the Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Center aortic aneurysm database. The disease pattern, distribution, and operative mortality were determined. The annual incidence of AAA in Hong Kong is 13.7 per 100,000 population and 105 per 100,000 for those aged 65 and above. About 10% of the AAAs that presented were ruptured. The mean age of the AAA patients was 74 years, with 84% of them over age 65. The operative repair rate for AAAs was low, being only 8% for intact aneurysms and 54% for ruptured ones. Overall, 45% of all aneurysm repairs were performed for a ruptured AAA. There is diverse practice between major vascular centers and smaller regional hospitals. The territory-wide operative mortality rates for intact and ruptured aneurysms were 10% (range 4–24%) and 70% (range 38––100%), respectively. There was no gender bias in the rupture and operative rates. The overall mortality was 17% for intact AAAs and 78% for ruptured AAAs. The average length of hospital stay was 19 days for elective AAA surgery and 13 days for ruptured AAAs. The number of operations in high-volume centers is increasing with a concomitant decrease in operative mortality. There are no definitive data to indicate that the incidence of AAAs is rising, but a trend toward an increasing number of operations in referral centers is noted. The low repair rates for intact AAAs and the high proportion of repairs for ruptured aneurysms suggest that AAAs are undertreated in Hong Kong.     

Aneurysm rupture is independently associated with increased late mortality in those surviving abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to define whether veterans who survived repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) experienced late survival rates similar to those surviving repair of intact AAA. METHODS: All veterans undergoing AAA repair in DRGs 110 and 111 during fiscal years 1991-1995 were identified using the Veterans Affairs (VA) Patient Treatment File (PTF). Late mortality was defined using VA administrative databases including the Beneficiary Identification and Record Locator System and PTF. Illness severity and patient complexity were defined using PTF discharge data that were further analyzed by Patient Management Category software. Veterans were followed up to 6 years after AAA repair. RESULTS: During the study, 5833 veterans underwent repair of intact AAA while 427 had repair of ruptured AAA in all VA medical centers. Operative mortality was defined as that which occurred within 30 days of surgery or during the same hospitalization as aneurysm repair. For those undergoing repair of intact AAA, operative mortality thus defined was 4.5% (265/5833). Operative mortality was 46% (195/427) after repair of ruptured AAA. Overall mortality (including operative mortality) during 2.62+/-1.61 years follow-up was 22% (1282/5833) with intact AAA versus 61% (260/427) for those with ruptured AAA (P<0.001). Further analysis of survival outcomes was performed in patients who survived AAA repair (i.e., those who were discharged alive and lived 30 days or more after surgery). Of those who initially survived repair of ruptured AAA, 28% (65/232) died during follow-up versus 18% (1017/5568) who initially survived repair of intact AAA (odds ratio 1.74; 95% confidence limits 1.30-2.34; P<0.001). In those initially surviving AAA repair, stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that increasing age, illness severity, patient complexity, as well as AAA rupture and aortic graft complications were increasingly and independently associated with late mortality. Mean survival time was 1681 days for those who survived >30 days and who were discharged alive after repair of ruptured AAA versus 1821 days for those who initially survived repair of intact AAA (P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to higher postoperative mortality rates with ruptured AAA, mortality during follow-up for survivors of AAA repair was also greater for those who survived repair of ruptured AAA. The toll taken by ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms did not end in the immediate postoperative period.     

Reoperative aortic surgery.

The presentation of long-term complications after conventional aortic surgery and the treatment of patients that have had reoperative aortic operations are reviewed. Ninety-seven consecutive patients that had 102 subsequent aortic operations at a tertiary referral center were studied. Presenting symptoms, demographics, risk factors, indications for initial and second procedures, operative techniques and outcomes were recorded in a computerized database. There were 70 men and 27 women studied, with an average age of 64 years. First operations were performed primarily for aneurysm (56%) and occlusive disease (44%). The interval between procedures ranged up to 23 years, with a mean of 6 years. Indications for reoperation were subsequent aneurysm (65), graft occlusions (25) and/or infections (24). Seventy-three percent of the subsequent aneurysms were true metachronous aneurysms; the others were associated with the graft or an anastomosis. Para-anastomotic aneurysms may be more common with a primary end-to-side graft configuration. One-third of subsequent aneurysms were not palpable and asymptomatic. Graft occlusion can be treated safely with elective repeat bypass (mortality 0%). Graft infections that require total graft removal remain a challenging problem (mortality 17%). Although surgical approach for reoperations utilized more extensive exposure and proximal clamping, 59 elective aneurysm cases had a 5.1% mortality rate; eight emergent procedures for ruptured aneurysms resulted in 88% mortality. Reoperation for graft occlusion or infection showed a similar high mortality rate with emergent cases. In this referral practice, graft occlusion and infection are relatively less frequent, whereas metachronous aneurysm formation is now the most common indication for reoperation. These aneurysms often remain undetected until symptoms occur; frank rupture is usually lethal. As elective repair with modern reoperative techniques can be safely performed, routine computed tomographic examination is advisable at least every 5 years after aortic operations.     

Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm – a Challenge to Open Repair? Results of a Single Centre Experience in 20 Patients

Introduction: the mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) remains in the region of 50% despite advances in critical care. Endovascular repair of AAA has been shown to be associated with reduced physiological stress in the elective setting. It is hypothesised that the reduced physiological stress associated with EVAR may improve the outcome in patients with ruptured AAA. Methods: a feasibility study of endovascular repair of ruptured AAA was undertaken at the University Hospital, Nottingham, U.K. between 1994 and 2000. Patients admitted with ruptured AAA were assessed by a team familiar with endovascular techniques for elective repair of AAA. After giving informed consent patients underwent spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in the majority of cases. Patients were then transferred to the operating theatre for EVAR. Results: twenty patients underwent repair of ruptured AAA. Of these 20 patients, seven were referred from another hospital. Eight patients were considered unfit for open repair. The median duration of procedure was 180 min (range 120–480) and median blood loss was 1200 ml (range 750–2000 ml). The overall peri-operative mortality was 45%. A number of intra-operative and peri-operative procedures (both open and endovascular) were required to ensure aneurysm exclusion and to deal with the complications of endovascular surgery. Conclusions: ruptured AAA remains a particularly hazardous condition to treat. There are a number of advantages of EVAR in this condition. A number of the problems early in the experience of EVAR have been addressed, but further experience is required to demonstrate its efficacy when compared with open repair.