Subconjunctival bevacizumab for corneal neovascularization

Objective To report the efficacy of subconjunctival bevacizumab injection in patients with corneal neovascularization (NV). Methods This retrospective interventional case study included two eyes of two patients with corneal NV due to aqueous-deficient dry eye with filamentary keratitis in the first case, and corneal graft failure in the second case. Patients received a subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg (0.1 ml) bevacizumab. Morphologic changes were investigated by slit-lamp biomicroscopy and corneal photography. Results Corneal NV was dramatically regressed a week after injection in the first case. In the second case, minor vessels were regressed while the major one did not. No infection or inflammation was observed. No relapse was seen within the follow-up of two to three months. Conclusion Subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab may offer an additional strategy for the treatment of corneal NV.     

Subconjunctival bevacizumab for corneal neovascularization

Acta Ophthalmol. 2010: 88: 868–871

Abstract.

Purpose: This work aimed to study and evaluate the effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab injection in patients with corneal neovascularization (CNV) resulting from different ocular surface disorders. Methods: Ten eyes with CNV caused by different ocular surface disorders were studied. All eyes had both major and minor vessel CNV caused by factors such as healed corneal ulcers, long‐standing chronic inflammatory diseases and corneal ischaemia (caused by contact lenses). All eyes received a single subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg (0.1 ml) bevacizumab. Morphological changes in the major and minor vessels were evaluated using slit‐lamp biomicroscopy and corneal photography. Results: Conspicuous recession of the minor vessels of CNV was observed in all eyes at 2 weeks post‐injection. The extent of CNV of the major vessels was significantly decreased at 2 weeks post‐injection. The level of CNV continued to decrease noticeably for 3 months and then stabilized for the remainder of the 6‐month follow‐up period. Parameters used for evaluation included the total area of CNV, which amounted to 14.0 ± 5.4% of the corneal surface pre‐injection, compared with 9.4 ± 3.9% post‐injection (p < 0.01), reflecting a mean decrease in CNV of 33 ± 8%, and the extent of neovascularization, which decreased from 4.3 ± 1.5 clock hours pre‐injection to 2.4 ± 1.1 clock hours post‐injection (p < 0.01). During the 6‐month follow‐up, none of the 10 eyes showed any complication that could be related to subconjunctival bevacizumab injection. Conclusions: Bevacizumab can be used safely and effectively for CNV resulting from different ocular surface disorders. It represents an effective treatment for minor vessel neovascularization caused by long‐standing chronic inflammation (e.g. trachoma) or long‐standing corneal ischaemia (e.g. contact lenses), as well as for major vessel neovascularization resulting from different causes. Bevacizumab was well tolerated over the 6‐month follow‐up period.     

Subconjunctival bevacizumab injection for corneal neovascularization in recurrent pterygium

PURPOSE: We report on the use of subconjunctival bevacizumab on corneal vessel density in recurrent pterygia. METHODS: The charts of 5 patients with recurrent pterygium, who received subconjunctival injections of bevacizumab (2.5 mg/0.1 ml) were retrospectively reviewed. Ophthalmic evaluation included Snellen visual acuity (VA), tonometry and complete examination before the injection and at 1 week and 1 and 3 months thereafter. Digital photographs of the eyes were analyzed by image analysis software to determine the area of cornea covered by new vessels as a percentage of the total corneal area. RESULTS: No ocular or systemic adverse events were observed. No change in visual acuity was noted in any patient following the injection. The mean change in corneal vascularization after one bevacizumab injection was 0.03%+/-0.45, while after two injections the change was 0.025%+/-0.19 (both not statistically different than zero, t-test). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term results suggest that subconjunctival bevacizumab is well tolerated but does not cause regression of corneal vessels in recurrent pterygium.     

Subconjunctival bevacizumab for vascularized rejected corneal grafts

We describe 3 patients who experienced corneal neovascularization following keratoplasty and were treated with a single subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg bevacizumab. Although there was immediate regression of the corneal vascularization and haze, as well as improvement in the anterior chamber reaction, the effects were short-lived and starting from the second week, the corneal vessels began to progress. All 3 cases ended in permanent graft failure. The series suggests a possible role for bevacizumab in the management of graft rejection with vascularization.     

Subconjunctival conbercept for the treatment of corneal neovascularization

AIM: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of subconjunctival injection of conbercept in the treatment of corneal neovascularization (CNV). METHODS: The data on 10 consecutively recruited patients with CNV who received a subconjunctival conbercept (1 mg) once, and measured the area, length, and diameter of neovascularization before and after (1d, 1, 2wk, and 1mo) treatment as well as the occurrence of systemic and ocular complications after treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant reduction in the area of CNV one day after treatment (mean±SD: 38.46±11.36 mm2), compared with before treatment (42.46±12.80 mm2, P<0.01). There was also a statistically significant reduction in the length (3.86±1.80 mm vs 4.64±1.77 mm, P<0.01) and diameter (0.044±0.022 vs 0.060±0.026, P<0.05) of CNV, one week after treatment comparing to before treatment. The reduction in all three parameters was maximized at two weeks after treatment (area: 29.49±8.83 mm2, P<0.001; length: 3.50±1.88 mm, P<0.001; and diameter: 0.038±0.017 mm, P<0.01). No severe systemic or ocular complication was observed during the study. CONCLUSION: During the observation period of one-month, subconjunctival injection of conbercept is an effective and safe method for the reduction of CNV. It may be effective as a preoperative drug for neovascular corneal transplantation.     

Corneal endothelial safety following subconjunctival and intrastromal injection of bevacizumab for corneal neovascularization

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect on endothelial cell density and morphology of combined subconjunctival and intracorneal injection of bevacizumab for the treatment of corneal neovascularization (NV). The charts and specular microscopy images of ten consecutive patients with corneal NV, who received combined subconjunctival+intracorneal injections of bevacizumab were reviewed. Patients received three injections of bevacizumab 25 mg/mL (1.25 mg/0.05 mL subconjunctival and 1.25 mg/0.05 mL intrastromal) 4–6 weeks apart. Endothelial cell counts (ECCs) and morphological changes were assessed by non-contact specular microscopy performed at baseline, 1 month after each injection and at 3 and 6 months after the last injection. There were no significant changes in ECCs (p = 0.663), coefficient of variation (p = 0.076), percentage of hexagonal cells (p = 0.931) or mean corneal thickness (p = 0.462) from pre-injection values to the 6-month follow-up values. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. In our series, the use of combined subconjunctival and intracorneal bevacizumab did not cause any decrease in ECCs or morphological alterations up to 6 months after the last of three injections. Further studies are required to confirm long-term safety in a larger sample population with longer follow-up, as well as the ideal dose, route of administration and frequency of bevacizumab administration.     

The effect of different doses of subconjunctival bevacizumab injection on corneal neovascularization

To evaluate the effects of various doses of subconjunctival bevacizumab injections in the treatment of patients with corneal neovascularization. During the 6-month-follow-up, no significant ocular or systemic adverse events were observed related to the subconjunctival bevacizumab injection. In Group 1, the total area of corneal neovascularization before injection was 14.8 ± 3.2 % of the corneal surface and 10.2 ± 2.8 % 6 months after injection (p < 0.01). The mean decrease in Group 1 was 32.0 ± 3.0 %. In Group 2, the total area of corneal neovascularization before and 6 months after the injection was 14.2 ± 2.5 and 9.8 ± 2.3 %, respectively (p < 0.01). The mean decrease in Group 2 was 31.0 ± 2.3 %. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Twenty-four eyes of 24 patients with corneal neovascularization who were treated with a subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab were included in this retrospective study. Fourteen eyes were treated with 2.5 mg/0.1 ml (Group 1), and 10 eyes were treated with 5.0 mg/0.2 ml (Group 2) of subconjunctival bevacizumab. Digital photographs of the cornea were used to determine the area of corneal neovascularization before injection and at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment. Subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab is well tolerated and associated with a partial regression of corneal neovascularization. The efficacy of this treatment is not correlated to the injection dose.     

Therapeutic effect of subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab in the treatment of corneal neovascularization

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with corneal neovascularization. Methods: Twenty‐nine eyes of 29 patients with corneal neovascularization were treated with subconjunctival injection [1.25 mg/0.05 ml (seven eyes), 2.5 mg/0.1 ml (15 eyes) and 5.0 mg/0.2 ml (seven eyes)] of bevacizumab. Best‐corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure and area of corneal neovascularization were measured before injection and at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after treatment. Results: At 1 week, the mean neovascularized corneal area decreased significantly to 85.5 ± 18.0% (p = 0.01) in the eyes treated with 2.5 mg bevacizumab and to 73.1 ± 23.4% (p = 0.02) in the eyes treated with 5.0 mg bevacizumab. At 3 months, the mean neovascularized corneal area was 93.6 ± 10.6% (p = 0.10 compared to baseline; p < 0.01 compared to 1 week) in the eyes treated with 2.5 mg bevacizumab and 83.3 ± 25.8% (p = 0.03 compared to baseline; p = 0.02 compared to 1 week) in the eyes treated with 5.0 mg bevacizumab. However, there were no significant changes in the areas of the eyes injected with 1.25 mg bevacizumab. Conclusion: Subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab can partially reduce corneal neovascularization in the short term, and the efficacy of this treatment correlates with the injection dose.     

Inhibition of experimental corneal neovascularization by using subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab (Avastin)

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab (Avastin) administration on corneal neovascularization (NV) in rabbits. METHODS: NV was induced by placing a suture at the corneal periphery of the right eye of 20 rabbits. Immediately after suturing and again 1 week later, rabbits were divided into 2 groups and administered a subconjunctival injection of normal saline (control) or bevacizumab (Avastin; 5 mg/0.2 mL), respectively. On day 14, digital photographs of the cornea were taken and analyzed to determine the area of the cornea covered by NV. In addition, immunohistochemical analysis was used to determine CD31 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in corneal tissue. RESULTS: Analysis of digital photographs showed that there was less corneal NV in bevacizumab-treated eyes than in controls (P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). In addition, there was less staining for VEGF and CD31 in corneas from bevacizumab-treated eyes than in control eyes. Subconjunctival bevacizumab injections were not associated with any complications during observation. CONCLUSIONS: Subconjunctival bevacizumab administration decreased suture-induced corneal neovascularization in rabbits.     

玻璃体腔注射Bevacizumab治疗特发性脉络膜新生血管的临床观察

目的观察玻璃体腔注射Bevacizumab治疗特发性脉络膜新生血管的临床效果。方法采用非随机对照临床回顾性研究,对经直接或间接检眼镜、荧光素眼底血管造影和吲哚青绿脉络膜血管造影以及光学相干断层扫描检查确诊的特发性脉络膜新生血管患者共32例(32眼),病程10d～1a,行玻璃体腔注射25g.L-1Bevacizumab治疗,注射次数为1～3次,间隔4周,治疗后随访4～18个月,对比分析术前与末次随访的视力、眼底、荧光素眼底血管造影和吲哚青绿脉络膜造影检查显示的渗漏以及光学相干断层扫描检查显示的平均中央视网膜厚度的变化。结果术前和末次随访时平均logMAR视力分别为0.23590±0.19751和0.39750±0.27287,治疗前后比较差异有显著统计学意义(t=-5.530,P<0.001)。OCT显示术前平均中央视网膜厚度为(317.72±75.01)μm,末次随访为(206.28±31.56)μm,治疗前后比较差异有显著统计学意义(t=8.857,P<0.001)。造影显示渗漏消失者18眼,减少者12眼,渗漏持续者2眼。随访期间有5眼出现小片结膜下出血,1眼出现少量玻璃体腔出血,注射后第2天3眼眼压有明显下降,未见其他并发症。2例病情复发,复发率为6.25%,复发病例进行再次注射治疗仍有疗效。结论玻璃体腔注射Bevacizumab治疗特发性脉络膜新生血管安全有效,但其长期的疗效和安全性评价尚需进行多中心、大样本的临床随机对照研究。     

Bevacizumab对大鼠角膜新生血管的抑制作用

目的 观察bevacizumab对角膜新生血管的抑制作用.方法 选取鼠龄6～8周、体质量(180±10)g的雄性Wistar大鼠40只,建立碱烧伤角膜新生血管模型;将大鼠随杌分为3个不同剂量药物治疗组(实验组)和1个对照组,每组10只(20眼),大鼠角膜碱烧伤后分别给予结膜下注射不同剂量(0.5 mg、1.0 mg、2.0 mg)的bevacizumab,对照组注入生理盐水;然后进行角膜新生血管的各项数据观察,观察期为16 d,主要观察项目包括各组角膜新生血管的生长情况;计算角膜新生血管的生长面积;碱烧伤后第7天和第16天后采集角膜,标本行组织病理学检测和免疫组织化学检测,第16天,计算平均OD值;评价药物对角膜新生血管的抑制效果.结果 碱烧伤后第7天、第14天,实验组与对照组新生血管面积比较差异均有统计学意义(均为P＜0.05);组织病理学检测发现各实验组炎性细胞浸润、新生血管形成均明显轻于对照组.对照组血管内皮生长因子(vascular endothelial growth factor,VEGF)染色明显增强,实验组的表达明显减弱.碱烧伤后第16天,实验组与对照组比较,VEGF染色阳性细胞数和VEGF平均OD值差异均有统计学意义(均为P＜0.05).碱烧伤后第7天、第16天大鼠角膜CD34的免疫组织化学检测结果及新生血管密度计数方面,实验组和对照组比较差异均有统计学意义(均为P＜0.05).结论 结膜下注射一定浓度的bevacizumab对大鼠角膜碱烧伤后的新生血管生长有抑制作用.     

Inhibitory effects of bevacizumab on angiogenesis and corneal neovascularization

Background

To evaluate the inhibitory effects of bevacizumab (Avastin®) on angiogenesis using cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in vitro and on corneal neovascularization by subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab in vivo.

Methods

After the HUVECs were exposed to different concentrations of bevacizumab stimulated with VEGF (10 ng/ml) for 2, 6, and 24 hours, cellular-activity-like proliferation, migration and tube formation were assessed. Subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab (2.5 mg/0.1 ml) was performed after corneal chemical burn injury. Then the cornea was evaluated by biomicroscopy, fluorescein angiography, and light microscopy.

Results

The inhibitory effects of bevacizumab on VEGF-induced HUVECs proliferation showed a dose-dependent response for 2 and 6 hours, but all groups were effectively inhibited regardless of the concentration of bevacizumab for 24 hours. The inhibitory effects of bevacizumab on the migration of VEGF-induced HUVECs showed a time- and dose-dependent response. The inhibitory effects of bevacizumab on VEGF-induced HUVECs tube formation showed a dose-dependent response only for 24 hours. On days 3 and 8 after the subconjunctival injection, bevacizumab-treated eyes showed less neovascular growth than BSS-treated eyes in biomicroscopic, fluorescein angiographic, and light microscopic findings in vivo.

Conclusions

Bevacizumab effectively inhibits angiogenesis and corneal neovascularization, and could be used as a inhibitor of corneal neovascularization in the future.