Electrophysiological characteristics of accessory pathways with prolonged retrograde conduction

Electrophysiological characteristics of an accessory pathway (AP) with a long ventriculoatrial (VA) interval (arbitrarily defined as > or = 50 ms and absence of continuous electrical activity) and no retrograde decremental property are described in this study. Fifteen patients (group 1) were compared with 171 patients with normal VA conduction (group 2). Mean VA conduction time was 77 +/- 24 versus 34 +/- 12 ms in group 1 versus group 2, respectively. Group 1 patients were older (55 +/- 14 vs 40 +/- 14 years), the male to female ratio was higher (2.8 vs 1.6), and APs were more prevalent on the right (60%) but manifest APs were lower (20% vs 54%) compared to group 2 patients (P < 0.05 in all cases). QRS morphology during induced atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia was identical in both groups but the tachycardia cycle length was longer in group 1 (373 +/- 29 vs 344 +/- 50 ms, P < 0.05). Retrograde AP block cycle length and effective refractory period were greater in group 1 (362 +/- 59 vs 293 +/- 57 ms; 330 +/- 58 vs 273 +/- 55 ms, both P < 0.05). Adenosine (up to 18 mg) and verapamil (5-10 mg) failed to block the VA conduction via AP during ventricular pacing. In group 1 the number of radiofrequency lesions for a successful ablation were significantly less (3 +/- 2 vs 6 +/- 5, P < 0.05). In conclusion, APs with a long VA interval and no decremental retrograde conduction have electrophysiological characteristics that are different from those with a short VA interval. Role of aging deserves further exploration.     

Ventriculoatrial Conduction in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Implications for Tachycardia Discrimination by Dual Chamber Sensing

Incorporation of atrial electrograms in the tachycardia detection algorithm may improve tachyarrhythmia discrimination by ICDs but retrograde ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction over the AV node during ventricular tachyarrhythmia may be problematic. The present study analyzed VA conduction characteristics in 66 ICD patients who had evaluation of the VA conduction system by electrophysiological studies before implant. VA conduction was demonstrated in patients during ventricular decremental stimulation. Forty patients had inducible sustained monomorphic VT. The minimum cycle length maintaining 1:1 VA conduction during ventricular stimulation was longer than the cycle of VT in every patient (496 ±100 msec vs 320 ± 81 msec; P < 0.01). Occasional VA conduction during VT was observed in five patients and one patient had 2:1 VA conduction during induced VT. No patient had 1:1 VA conduction during VT. We conclude that brisk VA conduction is uncommon and 1:1 VA conduction during VT is rare in ICD recipients. VA conduction is unlikely to complicate the incorporation of atrial electrograms into tachyarrhythmia detection algorithms.     

Differentiation of Sinus Tachycardia From Ventricular Tachycardia with 1:1 Ventriculoatrial Conduction in Dual Chamher Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Feasibility of a Criterion Based on the Atrioventricular Interval

Tachycardia discrimination in future implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is likely to be enhanced by the addition of an atrial sensing/pacing lead. However, differentiation of sinus tachycardia (ST) from ventricular tachycardia (VT) with 1:1 VA conduction will remain problematic. We assessed the use of the AV interval as a potential criterion for correctly differentiating ST from VT. Incremental V pacing at the right ventricular (HV) apex served as a “VT” model in each of 41 patients with 1:1 VA conduction to pacing cycle lengths ≤ 450 msec. High right atrial and RV apical electrograms during normal sinus rhythm (NSR) and during incremental V pacing were digitized (simulating ICD sensing). From these signals, AV interval versus pacing cycle length plots were computer generated to identify crossover cycle lengths, each defined as the cycle length at which the AV interval during V pacing equals the AV interval during NSR. At cycle lengths longer than the crossover value, the AV interval during “VT” exceeds the AV interval during NSR. In contrast, the AV interval during ST is physiologically shorter than the AV interval during NSR. Thus, ST can be readily differentiated from “VT” over a range of cycle lengths greater than the crossover value. The overall mean calculated crossover cycle length was 371 ± 52 msec. In 11 patients paced multiple times, each crossover cycle length was reproducible (mean coefficient of variation was 1.2%± 0.9% per patient). AV intervals measured at the RV apex were also analyzed with incremental V pacing during catecholamine stimulation (isoproterenol, n = 5) and during alternate site “VT” (RV outflow tract [n = 8] and left ventricle [n = 2]). In all these cases, the new “VT” plots of AV interval versus pacing cycle length coincided with or fell to the left of those obtained during control RV apical pacing and recording (i.e., these AV interval values crossed the NSR baseline at cycle lengths ≤ the crossover cycle length). Thus, the cycle length range for recognizable differentiation of ST from “VT” remained valid. The data suggest that the described AV interval criterion relying on the crossover cycle length: (1) is a promising approach to improve differentiation of ST from relatively slow VTs with 1:1 VA conduction, and (2) can readily be automated in future dual chamber ICDs, given its computational simplicity.     

Specificity of Retrograde Conduction in Screening for Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Baseline AV conduction properties (antegrade and retrograde) are often used to assess the presence of dual AV nodal physiology or concealed AV accessory pathways. Although retrograde conduction (RET) is assumed to be a prerequisite for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), its prevalence during baseline measurements has not been evaluated. We reviewed all cases of AVNRT referred for radiofrequency ablation to determine the prevalence of RET at baseline evaluation and after isoproterenol infusion. Results: Seventy-three patients with AVNRT underwent full electrophysiological evaluation. Sixty-six patients had manifest RET and inducible AVNRT during baseline atrial and ventricular stimulation. Seven patients initially demonstrated complete RET block despite antegrade evidence of dual AV nodal physiology. In 3 of these 7 patients AVNRT was inducible at baseline despite the absence of RET. In the other four patients isoproterenol infusion was required for induction of AVNRT, however only 3 of these 4 patients developed RET. One of these remaining patients had persistent VA block after isoproterenol. Conclusions: The induction of AVNRT in the absence of RET suggests that this is not an obligatory feature of this arrhythmia. Therefore, baseline AV conduction properties are unreliable in assessing the presence of AVNRT and isoproterenol infusions should be used routinely to expose RET and reentrant tachycardia.     

Dissociation between Anterograde and Retrograde Conduction during Transvenous Cryoablation of Parahissian Accessory Pathways

Ablation of parahissian accessory pathways (APs) is a challenging procedure because of the high risk to provoke “iatrogenic” atrioventricular (AV) nodal block. The feasibility and safety of cryoablation (CA) have been already demonstrated both in patients with AV nodal reentry tachycardia and in those with anteroseptal APs. However, dissociation between anterograde and retrograde conduction after CA has not yet been described. We report two cases of CA of parahissian AP associated with transient dissociation between anterograde and retrograde conduction. (PACE 2011; 34:e98–e101)     

Retrograde (Ventriculoatrial) Conduction in Congenital Complete Heart Block

Retrograde ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction is documented at the time of dual chamber pacemaker implantation in a 36-year-old patient with congenital complete atrioventricular (AV) block. Programmed ventricular stimulation with stimuli of increasing prematurity demonstrated a lack of decremental conduction via a unidirectional retrograde pathway. Because retrograde VA conduction has been associated with pacemaker mediated endless loop tachycardia, the status of retrograde conduction should be assessed in all patients undergoing dual chamber pacemaker implantation, including those with congenital complete AV block who have previously been considered to have no conductive tissue between atria and ventricles.     

Cycle Length Alternation During Supraventricular Tachycardia: Occurrence and Mechanism in a Canine Model of AV Reentrant Tachycardia

Cycle length alternation (CLA) is commonly observed during supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) onset and termination. The present study was designed to gain insights into the mechanism and potential clinical relevance of CLA by comparing computer simulations of tachycardia to directly observed behavior in a canine model of AV reentrant tachycardia (AVRT). The computer model was based on the hypothesis that CLA is secondary to feedback between AV nodal output during SVT and subsequent AV nodal input, and used the measured anterograde AV nodal recovery curve (AV vs A1A2) to predict sequential AV and RR intervals during SVT. Orthodromic AVRT was created experimentally in 11 open-chested, autonomically-blocked (atropine plus nadolol) dogs using a sensing and pacing circuit that mimicked a retrograde-conducting accessory pathway. Steady-state cycle length and AV interval during experimental AVRT closely paralleled predictions made by the computer model. CLA appeared consistently at the onset of experimental AVRT at programmed VA intervals less than or equal to 100 msec (corresponding to VA less than or equal to 150 msec as measured clinically) in all dogs. The amplitude and duration of CLA increased as the VA interval decreased, and closely paralleled predictions based on the computer model. Abrupt accelerations in atrial pacing to the same rate as AVRT did not result in alternation of cycle length. In conclusion, alternation of cycle length results from feedback between AV nodal output and subsequent AV nodal input at the onset of reentrant supraventricular tachycardia, and does not require changes in autonomic tone or dual AV nodal pathways. CLA occurrence, amplitude, and duration are predictable based on AV node recovery properties, and depend on retrograde conduction properties of the reentrant circuit. The presence of CLA suggests that the AV node is an integral component of the SVT reentry circuit, and may be useful clinically to identify the mechanism of supraventricular tachycardias.     

Comparison of Ramp and Stepwise Incremental Pacing in Assessment of Antegrade and Retrograde Conduction

. conduction. Conventional assessmenl of antegrade (AV) and retrograde (VA) conduction involves stepwise increments in pacing rates until block in conduction is observed. This study was designed to establish the comparative characteristics of ramp pacing, in which the rate is continuously and smoothly incremented until block occurs. Two hundred and ten patients participated in portions of this study. Stepwise pacing was performed in 10 beat/minute steps, with the rate held for at least 15 seconds at each step; if marked prolongation or variability in conduction was observed, the rate was held constant for up to 60 seconds to allow for accomodation. With ramp pacing, the rate was gradually increased at a steady 2–4 beats/minute/second. Whenever possible, both stepwise and ramp pacing were performed for assessment of both antegrade and retrograde conduction. All patients had conducted sinus rhythm as their baseline mechanism. Antegrade conduction was similar using incremental stepwise and ramp pacing. The AH interval at a cycle length (CL) of 500 ms, the maximum AH increment, the cycle length at AV block were all remarkably similar (p = NS). Assessment of retrograde conduction produced similar results, with insignificant differences between maximum conducted VA intervals, and cycle length at VA block using the two pacing techniques. Ramp pacing provides a useful and rapid alternative to conventional stepwise incremental pacing in the assessment of antegrade and retrograde conduction in patients using both normal and accessory pathways. Ramp pacing was better tolerated, and some correlations between antegrade and retrograde conduction were stronger with the ramp pacing technique.     

Retrograde Supernormal Conduction, Gap Phenomenon in Concealed Accessory Atrioventricular Pathways

We present four patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome who exhibited retrograde supernormal conduction or gap phenomenon in concealed accessory pathways. In the first patient, ventricular extrastimulus testing revealed retrograde block at the coupling interval of 520 msec and reappearance of conduction at the coupling interval of 370 msec. In a second patient, 1:1 retrograde conduction was not present but supernormal conduction was demonstrated at coupling intervals of 360 msec to 310 msec during the ventricular extrastimulus testing when the basic drive consisted of atrioventricular (AV) simultaneous pacing. In a third patient, ventricular extrastimulus testing demonstrated retrograde conduction through the accessory pathway only at coupling intervals of 400 msec to 360 msec. In a fourth patient, retrograde block occurred at the coupling interval of 340 msec and retrograde "slow" conduction reappeared at coupling intervals of 300 msec to 250 msec (gap phenomenon) only when the basic drive consisted of AV simultaneous pacing. Thus, concealed accessory pathways may exhibit retrograde supernormal conduction or gap phenomenon. Ventricular extrastimulus testing consisting of AV simultaneous pacing during the basic drive may facilitate demonstration of these unusual properties.     

Quantitative Analysis of Concealed Conduction into Accessory Atrioventricular Pathways in Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome

Concealed conduction is demonstrated to occur in an accessory AV pathway (AP). To test the hypothesis that anterograde and retrograde concealed conduction in the AP would have different characteristics, 35 consecutive patients with single APs were studied. The anterograde or retrograde ERP of the AP could be determined in 23 of those patients. Anterograde concealed conduction in the AP was assessed in the first 13 patients with retrograde AP conduction (8 APs with retrograde conduction only and 5 with both directions) (group A). Retrograde concealed conduction in the AP was evaluated in the remaining 10 patients with anterograde AP conduction (6 APs with anterograde conduction only and 4 with both directions) (group B). The concealed conduction in the AP was quantified by determining the ERP of the AP using a “probe” extrastimulus (S_p) introduced in the opposite chamber. The ERP was determined both during conventional extrastimulus (S₁S₂ method; ERP_c) and during that with an S_p (S₁S_pS₂ method; ERP_p). The S_p was delivered before or after the last S₁ with various S₁S_p intervals. The ERP_p was determined at each S₁S_p interval. Three distinct patterns in concealed conduction in the AP were noted. In the first pattern, the ERP_p was always shorter than the ERP_c, whereas the reverse relation was noted in the second pattern. The third pattern showed a combination of the two. In group A, only the first pattern was noted. In group B, the first, second, and third patterns were noted in 4, 2, and 4 patients, respectively. The first pattern was noted only in septal APs and the second and third were seen only in left free-wall APs. The second pattern was seen in patients with retrograde AP conduction, whereas the third one was mainly noted in patients without retrograde AP conduction. These observations indicate that anterograde and retrograde concealed conduction in the AP have different characteristics. Shortening of the ERP_p might be due to the “peeling back” phenomenon, and its lengthening might be caused by the presence of the inhomogeneous refractory periods of the AP. (PACE 1997; 20[Pt. I]:1342-1353)     

Role of Specialized Conducting Fibers in the Genesis of "AV Nodal" Re-entry Tachycardia

Recent reports have suggested that an accessory bypass tract connecting the His bundle to the atrium (His-atrial fiber) may form the retrograde limb of "AV nodal" re-entry tachycardia (AVNRT). We studied 12 patients with AVNRT in whom the presence of an accessory atrioventricular fiber (Kent fiber) was excluded. We investigated the possibility of a His-atrial (H-A) fiber by examining the nature of retrograde conduction and by assessing the necessity of the atrium as a part of the re-entry pathway. Retrograde conduction through the A V node had characteristics similar to retrograde conduction over a Kent bundle; that is, retrograde conduction times were short and did not vary. With echo beats (Ae) evoked during antegrade refractory period determination early premature beats resulted in prolongation of the AH interval with no change in HA_e interval. During AVNRT the A'H':H'A' ratios ranged from 2.0–8.0 (mean 4.0 ± 1.8) and with changes in tachycardia cycle length the H'A interval remained constant. During retrograde refractory period determination, delay occurred below the AV node without change in the H-A interval. Estimations of retrograde conduction times by all 3 methods were not significantly different (p > 0.2). The pattern of retrograde conduction suggests anatomical or functional specialized fibers as the retrograde limb of the tachycardia. The necessity of the atria as a part of the re-entry circuit was assessed by the introduction of atrial premature beats (APBs) in the region of the atrial septum during AVNRT in 10 patients. APBs pre-excited the atria by 40–140 ms without changing the cycle length of the tachycardia, providing strong evidence against the participation of an extranodal His-atrial fiber in AVNRT, In conclusion, retrograde conduction during AVNRT appears to take place over a functional or anatomical specialized fiber within the AV node and not over an extranodal H-A fiber.     

Intermittent Preexcitation: Marked Enhancement of Anterograde Conduction in the Atrioventricular Accessory Pathway with Isoproterenol

A 29-year-old man presented with intermittent preexcitation and exertional syncope. Electrophysiological evaluation in the control state demonstrated a single, left posterior free-wall atrioventricular accessory pathway. The anterograde and retrograde effective refractory periods and block cycle lengths were long in the control state. No tachycardias were induced during programmed electrical stimulation. After intravenous administration of isoproterenol, anterograde conduction of the accessory pathway was markedly enhanced (block cycle length shortened 45% to less than 240 ms) and rapid antidromic reciprocating tachycardia (CL = 250 ms) associated with syncope was observed. Following successful surgical dissection of the accessory pathway the patient has been without tachycardia or exertional symptoms. We conclude that, under the influence of exercise or emotion, patients with intermittent preexcitation may be at risk for serious arrhythmias.     

Fast pathway ablation in a patient with PR prolongation

The classical form of typical atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is a “slow-fast” pathways tachycardia, and the usual therapy is an ablation of the slow pathway since it carries a low risk of atrioventricular (AV) block. In patients with long PR interval and/or living on the anterograde slow pathway, an alternative technique is required. We report a case of a 42-year-old lady with idiopathic restrictive cardiomyopathy, persistent atrial fibrillation status post pulmonary vein isolation, and premature ventricular complex ablation with a systolic dysfunction, who presented with incessant slow narrow complex tachycardia of 110 bpm that appeared to be an AVNRT. Her baseline EKG revealed a first-degree AV block with a PR of 320 ms. EP study showed no evidence of anterograde fast pathway conduction. Given this fact, the decision was to attempt an ablation of the retrograde fast pathway. The fast pathway was mapped during tachycardia to its usual location into the anteroseptal region, then radiofrequency ablation in this location terminated tachycardia. After ablation, she continued to have her usual anterograde conduction through slow pathway and the tachycardia became uninducible. In special populations with prolonged PR interval or poor anterograde fast pathway conduction, fast pathway ablation is the required ablation for typical AVNRT.     

Diagnostic Approach to Narrow Complex Tachycardia with VA Block

Narrow complex tachycardia with VA block is rare. The differential diagnosis usually consists of (1) junctional tachycardia (JT) with retrograde block: (2) AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with proximal common pathway block; and finally (3) nodofascicular tachycardia using the His-Purkinje system for antegrade conduction and a nodofascicular pathway for retrograde conduction. Analysis of tachycardia onset and termination, the effect of bundle branch block on tachycardia cycle length, and the response to atrial and ventricular premature depolarization must be carefully done. Making the correct diagnosis is crucial as the success rate in eliminating the tachycardia will depend on tachycardia mechanism.     

Alternate Ventriculo-Atrial Wenckebach Conduction during Ventricular Tachycardia

Although pacing-induced ventriculo-atrial (VA) Wenckebach conduction has been previously described, the occurrence of this phenomenon during ventricular tachycardia has received little attention. The latter is defined as 2:1 VA block in which the conducted beats show progressive lengthening of VA conduction until the sequence is terminated by two or three blocked ventricular beats. This phenomenon was observed in a 16-year-old boy who underwent electrophysiologic study for ventricular tachycardia as a late complication of surgical correction of tetralogy of Fallot. During pacing-induced ventricular tachycardia with a morphology similar to that of the spontaneous tachycardia, 8:4 alternating VA block was observed. This sequence suggested that the AV node was the site of block, the 2:1 block being located at the upper level, and the VA Wenckebach block at the lower level. Alternate VA Wenckebach conduction appears as a possible cause of variation in atrial depolarization intervals during ventricular tachycardias with short cycle lengths.     

Double Response of the Ventricle During Transient Entrainment in a Common Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

We report a patient with slow-fast atrioventricuiar (AV)nodal reentrant tachycardia, in which double ventricuJar response was demonstrated during rapid pacing at cycle length of 300 msec or less from the high right atrium. The determinants of double ventricular response during transient entrainment in the present case were: (1)a crucial conduction delay in the slow pathway; (2)the collision between the activation via the antegrade fast pathway (antidromically)of the last paced beat and the activation via the antegrade slow pathway (orthodromically)of the previous paced beat, instead of the unidirectional block in the slow pathway; and (3)the enhanced AV nodal conduction over the antegrade fast pathway.     

Factors Associated with Recurrence of Accessory Pathway Conduction After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation

Catheter ablation of 215 accessory pathways (APs) using radiofrequency current (RF) was attempted in 204 consecutive patients. Two hundred twelve of the 215 (99%) APs were successfully ablated. After a minimum follow-up period of 1 month (mean 8.5 ± 5.4 months), AP conduction had returned in 17 patients (8%). Recurrence of AP conduction was manifest by atrioventricular (AV) reentrant tachycardia in six patients, palpitations suggestive of AV reentrant tachycardia in five patients, ventricular preexcitation on electrocardiogram in five patients, and inducible AV reentrant tachycardia during a follow-up electrophysiological study in one asymptomatic patient. AP conduction returned as early as 12 hours and as late as 4.7 months, but was evident within 2 months of ablution in 15 of 17 (88%) patients. AP conduction recurred in 12%-14% of anteroseptal, right free-wall, and posteroseptal APs, but only 5% of left free-wall APs (P < 0.01). Retrograde only conducting APs (concealed APs) had recurrence of AP conduction more frequently (16%) than APs that exhibited antegrade conduction (5.5%; P < 0.01). Failure to record AP potentials from the ablation electrode, reflecting poor AP localization, was a strong predictor for recurrence of AP conduction. AP conduction returned in 19% of 48 APs when AP potentials were not recorded, compared to 5% of 164 APs where AP potentials were recorded from the ablation electrode (P < 0.01). The time to block of AP conduction from the onset of RF current application was longer in APs with recurrence of conduction (4.9 ± 6.1 sec vs 2.9 ± 3.4 sec; P < 0.02). Recurrence of AP conduction was more frequent when the stability of the ablation electrode was poor (12% of 41 APs vs 7% of 171 APs with stable electrode placement], and when the AP had multiple components (11% of 36 APs ablated at multiple sites vs 7% of 176 APs where AP was ablated at a single site), but these were not statistically significant. All 17 patients with recurrence of AP conduction underwent a second successful ablation. In conclusion, the overall incidence of recurrence of AP conduction is low, but is higher for right free-wall and septal APs, concealed APs, and probably relates to poor AP localization.     

Wide QRS Supraventricular Tachycardia Due to Coexisting Mahaim and Kent Pathways

In two patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, we observed the unusual coexistence of functional Mahaim and accessory atrioventricular pathways. In the first patient, three types of reciprocating tachycardia were demonstrable: (1) anterograde conduction over the atrioventricular (AV) node with right bundle branch block (RBBB) and retrograde conduction via a right-sided atrioventricular accessory pathway; (2) anterograde conduction through the AV node with RBBB and retrograde conduction via two (right-sided and septal) anomalous pathways; and (3) anterograde conduction through nodoventricular fibers and retrograde conduction over a right-sided accessory pathway. In the second patient the reentry circuit was comprised of AV node fasciculoventricular fiber in an anterograde direction and a right-sided accessory pathway in a retrograde direction. We believe this to be the first report of triple accessory pathways, consisting of two atrioventricular and one nodoventricular connection, demonstrated by intracardiac electrophysiologic study.     

A Direct Midseptal Approach to Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Pathway Ablation

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to describe a midseptal approach to selective slow pathway ablation for the treatment of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). In addition, predictors of success and recurrence were evaluated. Methods: Selective ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway utilizing radiofrequency (RF) energy and a midseptal approach was attempted in 60 consecutive patients with inducible AVNRT. Results: Successful slow pathway ablation or modification was achieved in 59 of 60 patients (98%) during a single procedure. One patient developed inadvertent complete AV block (1.6%). A mean of 2,7 ±1.4 RF applications were required with mean total procedure, ablation, and fluoroscopic times of 191± 6.3, 22.8 ± 2.3, and 28.2 ±1.8 minutes, respectively. The PR and AH intervals, as well as the antegrade and retrograde AV node block cycle length, were unchanged. However, the fast pathway effective refractory period was significantly shortened following ablation (354± 13 msec vs 298 ± 12 msec; P= 0.008). The A/V ratio at successful ablation sites were no different than those at unsuccessful sites (0.22 ± 0.04 vs 0.23± 0.03). Junctional tachycardia was observed during all successful and 60 of 122 (49%) unsuccessful RF applications (P < 0.0001). A residual AV nodal reentrant echo was present in 15 of 59 (25%) patients, During a mean follow-up of 20.1± 0.6 months (11.5–28 months) there were four recurrences (5%), 4 of 15 (27%) in patients with and none of 44 patients without residual slow pathway conduction (P = 0.002). Conclusions: A direct midseptal approach to selective ablation of the slow pathway is a safe, efficacious, and efficient technique. Junctional tachycardia during RF energy application was a highly sensitive but not specific predictor of success and residual slow pathway conduction was associated with a high rate of recurrence.     

Hemodynamic Consequences of Atrioventricular and Ventriculoatrial Pacing

The effect of atrialventricular versus ventricular pacing and contraction were studied in seven open-chest dogs. Cardiac output, left ventricular, left atrial, right atrial and pulmonary artery pressures were recorded. The right or left ventricular apical areas were consistently superior as ventricular pacing sites.
Appearance of cannon A waves within the pre- or ejection period produced a significant decrease in left ventricular and systemic blood pressure, and cardiac output with a concomitant increase in right atrial, ventricular and pulmonary pressures. Prominent "v" waves were also observed during these periods.
Reducing the basic driving cycle length from 400 to 300 msec caused a marlted deterioration of all hemodynamic parameters with the appearance of mechanical alternans. Random VA conduction or ventricular pacing in the presence of com-plete AV and VA heart block appeared to offer a more favorable hemodynamic result than constant 1:1 VA conduction. It is concluded that maintenance of a physiologic AV interval permitting atrial contraction to appear outside of pre- or ejection period of ventricular systole is an important determinant or ventriculor function during cardiac pacing.