S1椎弓根螺钉结合髂骨板间螺钉治疗骶髂关节骨折脱位

目的 探索S1椎弓根螺钉结合髂骨板问螺钉治疗骶髂关节骨折脱位的临床疗效，评价两者结合对骶髂关节骨折脱位的治疗价值。方法 对11例骶髂关节骨折脱位患者用脊柱内固定系统(TSRH)之S1椎弓根螺钉结合髂骨板间螺钉进行固定，该组患者涉及骶髂关节的垂直移位及旋转的骨盆环变形，归于Tile分型的B类或C类骨盆损伤。11例患者均伴有前环损伤，其中9例予以加压钢板(smith nephew)内固定，余2例患者单纯采用后路手术内固定。结果 7例患者垂直移位完全复位，9例旋转畸形纠正，未发现感染及神经损伤等并发症。结论 S1椎弓根螺钉结合髂骨板问螺钉固定技术治疗骶髂关节骨折脱位，可获得即刻稳定性并良好地维持了复位的效果．这一混合技术对于涉及垂直及旋转损伤的骨盆环损伤有稳定的作用。     

Posterior bridging osteosynthesis for traumatic sacroiliac joint dislocation: a report of seven cases

Objective

To evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic results in patients treated for 61C3-2 (OTA class) pelvic ring disruption with a posterior bridging sacroiliac fixation.

Design

Retrospective clinical and radiological study.

Setting

University Hospital.

Patients/participants

Between May 2002 and March 2003, seven patients with sacroiliac dislocation were treated with a technique developed for the treatment of pelvic injuries with vertical and horizontal instability.

Intervention

We applied spino-pelvic fixation techniques, using spine instrumentation, to stabilize an SI dislocation. This technique consists of two 5 mm diameter screws inserted into the S1 pedicle and S2 ala. A 5.5 mm rod joins the 2 sacral screws to two 7 mm screws placed into the posterior iliac crest and secured into the cancellous mass of the posterior ilium . The described technique stabilizes the SI-joint by performing a bridging osteosynthesis instead of the commonly performed iliosacral screw osteosynthesis passing the SI-joint. Symphyseal platting is performed to reduce and stabilize the anterior ring if necessary.

Main outcome measurements

Data were analyzed as follows: pelvic fracture classification; functional outcome; radiographic outcome; Leg length discrapency; and CT scan aspect of the sacroiliac joint.

Results

Associated pelvic injuries were present in all the patients and include symphysis rupture and acetabular fractures. Four of the seven patients had fractures of the lower extremities. Follow-up was available for all patients at an average of 27 months (range, 32–24 months). Neither septic nor cutaneous complications were reported. No loss of post-op reduction and no fixation failure were observed. The functional results noted at the last examination were satisfactory with a mean Majeed score of 93.

Conclusion

In our opinion, this surgical technique may be indicated in Tile type C1.2 (61C3-2 OTA class) pelvic ring disruption. It obviously reaches its limits in sacral fractures. The technique described provides effective control of vertical displacement while providing a certain degree of horizontal mobility to facilitate reduction and osteosynthesis of anterior lesions. The quality of the fixation allowed early weight bearing.     

Anatomically correct reduction and fixation of a Tile C-1 type unilateral sacroiliac disruption using a rod and pedicle screw system between the S1 vertebra and the ilium: experimental and clinical case report

 We have developed a new surgical technique for the treatment of Tile C-1 type sacroiliac disruption. We tried this procedure first in a cadaveric specimen and then applied it to a clinical case. We used the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital (TSRH) rod and pedicle screw system to insert one screw into the S1 vertebra without using an image intensifier and the other screw into the bone marrow of the ilium from the posterosuperior iliac spine. A straight rod was connected between the two screws by using a manipulator to attempt to reduce and fix the sacroiliac disruption. The combined pubic symphysis diastasis could be simultaneously reduced and fixed by using a plate through another incision, resulting in anatomically correct reconstruction of the pelvic ring. In this procedure, the alignment of the sacroiliac joint can be reversibly and directly changed during reduction and fixation. The sacroiliac joint can be strongly fixed because the screws can be freely inserted into the intact portion of the pelvis and the adjacent lumbar spine, if necessary. Good reduction is obtained because direct compression force is applied to the fracture site. The posterior and anterior procedures can be simultaneously performed under the same lateral position. Received: December 25, 2001 / Accepted: May 2, 2002     

骶髂关节解剖型棒-板内固定系统的生物力学评价

目的：探讨采用新型骶髂关节解剖型棒-板内固定系统（SABP）治疗骨盆骶髂关节骨折脱位的生物力学性能。方法：采集新鲜的冷冻尸体骨盆标本20具,造成骨盆骨折模型,采用实验应力分析方法,对SABP内固定和骶骨螺钉结合Galveston技术内固定、骶骨棒固定、重建钢板固定、骶髂关节螺钉等5种固定作对照比较,分别测定它们的刚度和强度,用以评价骨盆的稳定性。结果：采用新型骶髂关节解剖型棒-板内固定系统治疗骨盆骶髂关节骨折脱位,较骶骨螺钉结合Galveston技术内固定、骶髂关节螺钉、重建钢板固定、骶骨棒固定其骨盆的刚度分别高10%、11%、16%、21%,强度分别高12%、14%、21%、31%;应变分别小13%、14%、22%、25%,位移分别小10%、12%、16%、20%,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）,并且超过正常人骨盆标本,但差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论：采用新型SABP内固定装置治疗骨盆骨折,其强度、刚度最佳,优于其他内固定方法,是一种理想的新型内固定器械。     

应用Galveston技术联合椎弓根钉系统治疗骶髂关节骨折脱位

目的探讨应用Galveston技术联合椎弓根钉系统治疗骶髂关节骨折脱位的方法和疗效。方法对18例骶髂关节骨折脱位患者应用Galveston技术联合椎弓根钉系统进行骶髂关节复位内固定。结果18例均获得随访,时间8-23个月。所有患者术后X线片均提示骨折复位及内固定位置良好,未发现内固定松动及断裂。采用M ajeed评价标准：满意10例,良好7例,一般1例。结论应用Galveston技术联合椎弓根钉系统治疗骶髂关节骨折脱位,不仅操作方便,而且复位固定可靠,疗效满意。     

S1 pediculoiliac screw fixation in instabilities of the sacroiliac complex: biomechanical study and report of two cases

OBJECTIVE: A new technique for posterior sacroiliac fixation is described and compared with conventional techniques. PATIENTS/MATERIAL AND METHODS: A patient with sacral alar fracture (zone 1) and another one with sacroiliac joint instability due to tuberculous infection underwent fixation using screws placed in the S1 pedicle and the iliac bone. Vertical stability of the new technique also was investigated using polyurethane pelvic bone analogs and compared with anterior double plating (group P) and iliosacral screw fixation (group ISS) techniques. RESULTS: Healing was obtained and reduction was maintained in both patients on the final follow-up examination at 2 years postoperatively. Vertical loading tests revealed that failure loads within the first 10 mm of displacement of the new pediculoiliac screw fixation technique (group PIS) was higher than plating (P = 0.03) and lower than ISS techniques (P = 0.002). Ultimate failure load of the PIS technique was slightly higher than plating (P = 0.277) and lower than ISS techniques (P = 0.003). With the addition of an iliosacral screw to the pediculoiliac screw construction (PIS+ISS), the PIS technique became more stable in early (P = 0.110) and ultimate failure loads (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Pediculoiliac screw fixation for sacroiliac joint disruptions and zone I sacrum fractures using iliac and S1 pedicle screws is a new and effective alternative for obtaining and maintaining anatomic reduction.     

Biomechanical study of 4-hole pubic symphyseal plating: locked versus unlocked constructs

To the authors' knowledge, no published studies have examined the use of locking plates on injuries of the anterior pelvic ring. The purpose of this study was to determine whether locked plates provide enhanced stability in the treatment of pubic symphyseal disruptions. Completely unstable pelvic injuries were simulated in pelvic Sawbones (model 1301; Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, Washington) and 2 different fixation constructs used for anterior fixation (4-hole, 3.5-mm pubic symphysis plate with all locked or all unlocked screws). Adjunctive sacroiliac screw fixation with a single 7.3-mm screw placed into S1 was used in all specimens. Specimens were analyzed for motion at the pubic symphysis and sacroiliac joints using a Material Testing System (MTS Systems Corporation, Eden Prairie, Minnesota). Each specimen was subjected to compressive loading in a single-limb stance. Side loading was also examined. The main outcome measurement was motion at the pubic symphysis and sacroiliac joints and overall construct stiffness. No significant difference existed in overall construct stiffness between the 2 methods of pubic symphysis fixation. The motions at the pubic symphysis or injured sacroiliac joints were not significantly different. In addition, motion at the pubic symphysis joint with lateral load was not improved with a locking construct.No significant difference existed between 4-hole locked or unlocked constructs used for fixation of the pubic symphysis. No apparent advantage of locking screws exists for disruptions of the pubic symphysis, and recent reports have questioned the possibility of catastrophic failure.     

Surgical technique of percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation in S3 level in unstable pelvic fracture with closed degloving injury and morrell lavallee lesion: Two case reports

IntroductionPercutaneous screw fixation is considered the best option in unstable pelvic fracture with severe soft tissue injury. However, fixation technique at the level of S3 has not been well established. This paper showed the feasible surgical technique of S3 screw insertion in unstable pelvic fracture with severe soft tissue injury.MethodsWe reported 2 cases of unstable pelvic injury of an 11 years old boy with Marvin-Tile (MT) C1 pelvic fracture with sacroiliac (SI) joint disruption, skin avulsion and Morel-Lavallée lesion. Second case was 30 years old male with open pelvic fracture MTB2 and vertical sacral fracture Denis zone I with Morel-Lavallée lesion, intraperitoneal bladder rupture, infected laparotomy wound dehiscence. We performed percutaneous screws insertion on both pubic rami and IS screw on S1 and S3 to both cases. Functional outcome was evaluated using Majeed and Hannover pelvic score.ResultsAll patients survived and had good reduction with no residual displacement on SI joint. The former case at 21-month follow up presented with excellent outcome (100/100) by Majeed score and very good outcome (4/4) by Hannover score; while the latter case, at 18-month, present with good outcome (85/100) Majeed score and fair outcome (2/4) Hannover score.ConclusionsPercutaneous screw fixation at the level of S3 is feasible and can be inserted in S3 level by sacroiliac type and sacral type with minimal soft tissue intervention and good functional outcome.     

Biomechanical comparison of posterior pelvic ring fixation

OBJECTIVE: To determine relative stiffness of various methods of posterior pelvic ring internal fixation. DESIGN: Simulated single leg stance loading of OTA 61-Cl.2, a2 fracture model (unilateral sacroiliac joint disruption and pubic symphysis diastasis). SETTING: Orthopaedic biomechanic laboratory. OUTCOME VARIABLES: Pubic symphysis gapping, sacroiliac joint gapping, hemipelvis coronal plane rotation. METHODS: Nine different posterior pelvic ring fixation methods were tested on each of six hard plastic pelvic models. Pubic symphysis was plated. The pelvic ring was loaded to 1000N. RESULTS: All data were normalized to values obtained with posterior fixation with a single iliosacral screw. The types of fixation could be grouped into three categories based on relative stiffness of fixation: For sacroiliac joint gapping, group 1-fixation stiffness 0.8 and above (least stiff) includes a single iliosacral screw (conditions A and J), an isolated tension band plate (condition F), and two sacral bars (condition H); group 2-fixation stiffness 0.6 to 0.8 (intermediate stiffness) includes a tension band plate and an iliosacral screw (condition E), one or two sacral bars in combination with an iliosacral screw (conditions G and I); group 3-fixation stiffness 0.6 and below (greatest stiffness) includes two anterior sacroiliac plates (condition D), two iliosacral screws (condition B), and two anterior sacroiliac plates and an iliosacral screw (condition C). For sacroiliac joint rotation, group 1-fixation stiffness 0.8 and above includes a single iliosacral screw (conditions A and J), two anterior sacroiliac plates (condition D), a tension band plate in isolation or in combination with an iliosacral screw (conditions E and F), and two sacral bars (condition H); group 2-fixation stiffness 0.6 to 0.8 (intermediate level of instability) includes either one or two sacral bars in combination with an iliosacral screw (conditions G and I); group 3-fixation stiffness 0.6 and below (stiffest fixation) consists of two iliosacral screws (condition B) and two anterior sacroiliac plates and an iliosacral screw (condition C). DISCUSSION: Under conditions of maximal instability with similar material properties between specimens, differences in stiffness of posterior pelvic ring fixation can be demonstrated. The choice of which method to use is multifactorial.     

S rod fixation to the sacrum in patients with neuromuscular spinal deformities.

A new form of pelvic fixation has been designed for use in patients with neuromuscular spinal deformities to overcome the problems imposed by the Galveston technique. One end of a Luque rod is prebent into an S shaped configuration and placed over the sacral ala supplying firm fixation across the lumbosacral junction without crossing the sacroiliac joint. It fixes firmly against the sacral ala by distracting against a hook or screw in the lumbar spine. A 12 year retrospective review of 67 patients with severe neuromuscular spinal deformities was accomplished. All surgeries were performed by one surgeon. All patients had good deformity correction with an average followup of 6 years and 2 months. Complications included: recurrence of pelvic obliquity (one patient), skin break-down over hardware (one patient), migration of hardware at sacrum (two patients), and rod breakage (five patients). The S rod is recommended for all patients with neuromuscular spinal deformities who require instrument fixation to the pelvis. Its ease of insertion and decreased operative time allow for a safe and dependable alternative fixation to the sacrum without crossing the sacroiliac joint.     

Vertically unstable pelvic fractures fixed with percutaneous iliosacral screws: does posterior injury pattern predict fixation failure?

OBJECTIVE: To measure the failure rate of percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation of vertically unstable pelvic fractures and particularly to test the hypothesis that fixations in which the posterior injury is a vertical fracture of the sacrum are more likely to fail than fixations with dislocations or fracture-dislocations of the sacroiliac joint. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. METHODS: All patients with pelvic fractures admitted between January 1, 1993, and December 31, 1998, were identified from the trauma registry. Hospital records were used to identify patients treated with iliosacral screws. Radiologic studies were examined to identify patients who had unequivocally vertically unstable pelvic fractures. Immediate postoperative and follow-up anteroposterior, inlet, and outlet radiographs from a minimum of 12 months postinjury were examined. Position, length, and numbers of iliosacral screws and any evidence of screw failure (eg, bending or breakage) were recorded. Residual postoperative displacement and late displacement of the posterior pelvis were measured. The main outcome measure was failure, defined as at least 1cm of combined vertical displacement of the posterior pelvis compared with immediate postoperative position. The main analysis was for association between fracture pattern and failure. Patient demographic data, iliosacral screw position, and anterior pelvic fixation method also were studied. RESULTS: The study group comprised 62 patients with unequivocally vertically unstable pelvic fractures in whom the posterior injury was treated with closed reduction and percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation. Of patients, 32 had dislocations or fracture-dislocations of the sacroiliac joint, and 30 had vertical fractures of the sacrum. Fixation failed in four patients, all with vertical sacral fractures and all within the first 3 weeks after surgery. These four patients required revision fixation. In two further cases with vertical sacral fractures, there was evidence that the fracture had only barely been held by the fixation, but these fractures healed, and follow-up radiographs did not meet the displacement criteria for failure. A vertical sacral fracture pattern was associated significantly with failure (Fisher exact test, P = 0.04); the excess risk of failure compared with sacroiliac joint injury was 13% (95% confidence interval 1% to 25%). There was no significant association between failure and anterior fixation method, iliosacral screw arrangement or length, or any demographic or injury variable. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation is a useful technique in the management of vertically unstable pelvic fractures, but a vertical sacral fracture should make the surgeon more wary of fixation failure and loss of reduction.     

骨盆后环损伤的内固定治疗

目的 探讨手术内固定治疗骨盆后环损伤的临床疗效.方法 对22例骨盆后环损伤患者分别采用微创技术椎弓根螺钉固定、骶髂关节空心螺钉固定及骨盆重建带后方髂髂固定3种方式治疗.结果 22例均随访,时间4~22个月.无切口感染、血管神经损伤及内固定松动或断裂,无骨折不愈合.结论 微创椎弓根螺钉固定、骶髂关节空心螺钉固定及骨盆重建带后方髂髂固定3种方式均为治疗骨盆后环损伤的有效方法,根据骨折类型及患者的情况选择不同的内固定方式,可获满意疗效.     

Sacroiliac fixation: a new technique after pelvic trauma

We propose a new technique for sacroiliac fixation for the treatment of pelvic fracture with vertical and horizontal instability (Tile class C). This fixation technique allows control of vertical displacement while allowing, if needed, a certain degree of movement in the horizontal plane to facilitate reduction of anterior lesions. The technique involves insertion of two sacral screws, one in S1 and one in S2, and two iliac screws. The iliac screws are inserted in the posterior iliac crest through two sacroiliac connectors placed on a rod linking the two sacral screws. Vertical displacement is controlled by blocking the screw heads on the connecting rod. If needed, a certain degree of horizontal mobility of the half pelvis can be allowed by loosening the connectors on the rods. This technique was used for 4 patients. Anatomic reduction was achieved and no secondary movement of the osteosynthesis material nor secondary displacement were observed. The quality of the fixation allowed rapid weight bearing in the standing position and early walking without crutches. This type of fixation can only be used for type C12 fractures in the Tile classification.     

改良Galveston技术与拉力螺钉固定单侧骶髂关节脱位的有限元分析

目的 通过对改良Galveston技术与拉力螺钉同定单侧骶髂关节脱位的三维有限元模型进行分析,比较其生物力学稳定性.方法基于CT扫描数据,利用Mimics10.01软件和Geomagic10.0软件埘骨盆模型进行几何重建;利用Solidworks2007软件对内固定器械进行几何重建.导人Hypermesh 10.0软件中进行刚格划分和装配,赋予材料属性.建立右侧骶髂关节脱位双侧L4-髂骨Galveston固定、双侧L5-髂骨Galveston固定、单侧L4-髂骨Galveston同定、单侧L5-髂骨Galveston固定和拉力螺钉固定5种有限元模型.最后导入Ansys10.0软件中,在L4椎体上方模拟施加500 N轴向压缩载荷,分析不同内固定方式的von Mises应力分布和应变分布.结果从应力和应变云图可知,双侧L4-髂骨Galveston固定、舣侧L5-髂骨Galveston固定、单侧L4-髂骨Galveston固定、单侧L5-髂骨Galveston固定及拉力螺钉固定后骨盆的最大应力值分别为1.690×109 Pa、1.310×109 Pa、0.834×109 Pa、0.836×109 Pa、1.584×109 Pa;骶骨相对于左侧髋骨的移位方向为向下、向前和向右,总位移依次为1.589×10-3m、1.871×10～m、2.404×10-3 m、2.468×10-3m、0.308×10-3m.结论各种内固定下 Von Mises应力集中分布于腰髂螺钉与骨质的结合部位.改良Galveston技术双侧固定较单侧固定应变小,无论是双侧固定还是单侧固定,固定于L4和L5的应变无明显差异,但均明显大于拉力螺钉吲定.

Abstract：

Objective To explore biomechanical properties of modified Galveston technique and lag screw fixation for dislocation of the unilateral sacroiliac ioint through finite element analysis. Methods Soft-ware Mimics 10.0l and Geomagic 10.0 was used to develop a geometric reconstruction of the pelvis based on the CT scan data.Geometric reconstructions of different internal fixations were also developed using software Solidworks 2007.The models were meshed,assembled and given the material properties through software Hypermesh 10.0.Five models of three-dimensional finite element(3D FE)were established for dislocation of the sacroiliac ioint:double L4-ilium Galveston fixation,double L5-ilium Galveston fixation,single L4-ilium Galveston fixation.single L5-ilium Galveston fixation,and lag screw fixation,Finally the models were imported to software Ansys 10.0.An axial load of 500 N was compressed above the L4 vertebral body.Stress-strain nephograms for the 5 different fixations were compared.and biomechanical stabilities of different internal fixations were analyzed. Results The stress-strain nephograms showed the maximum pelvic stresses in the 5 fixations were respectively 1.690×109Pa(double L4-1 Galveston),1.130×109Pa(double 1.584×109Pa(1ag screw fixation).Displacements of the sacrum were downward,forward,and rightward.The total displacements were respectively 1.589×10-3m,1.871×10-3m,2.404×10～m,2.468×10-3m and 0.308 ×103 m. Conclusions The maximum displacement in bilateral fixation is smaller than that in unilateral fixation with modified Galveston technique.In both bilateral and unilateral Galveston fixations for L4and L5,the maximum displacements are not significantly different,but they are larger than that in lag screw fixation.     

Computed tomography-guided screw fixation of a sacroiliac joint dislocation fracture: a case report

A 19-year-old woman sustained a vertical shear type pelvic fracture. Sacroiliac fixation using computed tomography (CT)-guided cannulated screws was performed for a left sacroiliac dislocation fracture, and a satisfactory result was obtained over time. Patients who have posterior instability of the lateral compression or vertical shear type do not obtain adequate stability by fixation of the anterior part alone; and they often have persistent residual pain, necessitating internal fixation of the posterior part later. Advantages of CT-guided sacroiliac screw fixation include precise evaluation of the degree of reduction and absence of nerve and vascular damage during the time the screw is inserted into the sacral body. This procedure is a useful, safe method owing to its minimal invasiveness in patients with unstable pelvic fractures that are reducible by manual manipulation or traction.     

Die perkutane transiliosakrale Zugschraubenosteosynthese des hinteren Beckenrings

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of posterior pelvic ring fractures by sacroiliac screws has become a well established treatment option for stabilization of posterior pelvic ring disruptions. Stable percutaneous pelvic ring fixation also implies a very low complication rate, e.g., in operative blood loss, wound healing, and operative time. To avoid malpositioning of the screws, sufficient reduction and radiologic visualization are essential. The surgical technique has been described in several studies; however, great importance is attached to the personal experience of the surgeon. Therefore, this study was conducted to establish a standard procedure that allows different surgeons a safe positioning of sacroiliac screws. RESULTS: A total of 41 injuries of the posterior pelvic ring were stabilized with 73 sacroiliac lag screws inserted by 7 different surgeons using a standardized technique. In all cases adequate reduction of the fracture and radiologic visualization were achieved. No wound infections, no relevant bleedings, and no spiral fractures of screws were observed. In two cases malpositioning led to revision of the screws. Of interest, one case of S1 paresthesia resulting from a malpositioned screw could be revised. In contrast, two cases of screw loosening and one case of screw bending did not require further intervention. CONCLUSION: We conclude that safe positioning of the sacroiliac screws was accomplished by all surgeons given a standardized technique. For safe insertion preparation of the patients, accurate visualization of the fracture zone, and potential closed reduction is always required.     

经皮空心钉固定治疗创伤性耻骨联合分离

 目的 探讨经皮空心钉固定治疗创伤性耻骨联合分离的手术方法及临床疗效。方法 2003年 2月至 2010年 12月, 治疗 46例伴耻骨联合分离的不稳定骨盆骨折, 男 27例, 女 19例;年龄 18~61岁, 平均 34.6岁。按 Tile分型: B1.1型 4例, B1.2型 7例, B2型 2例, B3型 2例, C1.1型 7例, C1.2型 7例, C1.3型 10例, C2型 5例, C3型 2例。行闭合复位经皮耻骨联合螺钉内固定后, 再行后环 固定, 包括经皮骶髂螺钉、经皮髂骨后部螺钉固定。除 4例 B1.1型骨折仅固定耻骨联合外, 余均同时行 后环固定。结果 手术时间 15~65 min, 平均 45 min;出血量 10~50 ml, 平均 25 ml。 46例患者均置入 1 枚耻骨联合螺钉, 35例术后行骨盆 CT检查, 其中 3例发现螺钉侵入盆腔, 但未引起任何临床症状。术后 无一例发生切口及钉道感染。 46例患者均获得随访, 随访时间 5~48个月, 平均 23.5个月;随访期间未 发现明显的复位丢失。根据 Matta和 Tornetta标准, 末次随访时优 43例, 良 3例。 31例(67.39%)患者恢 复原工作, 6例因合并损伤而改变原工作, 9例尚处于恢复期。 28例患者无骶髂关节疼痛;13例仅在用 力时有耻骨联合部或耻骨微痛, 但不影响日常生活;5例有不同程度的骶髂关节疼痛。结论 闭合复位经皮空心钉固定治疗创伤性耻骨联合分离安全可行, 操作简便, 损伤小, 疗效满意。     

导航下经皮微创螺钉内固定治疗骨盆骨折

目的:探讨计算机辅助导航技术在骨盆骨折治疗中的应用及相关术前术中注意事项。方法:2010年5月至12月,采用导航下经皮微创螺钉内固定方法治疗骨盆骨折16例,男12例,女4例;年龄20～54岁,平均37岁;车祸伤5例,重物压伤5例,高坠伤6例。单纯前环骨折1例,前后环均骨折15例,其中骶髂关节脱位6例,骶骨骨折9例(均未累及骶管)。根据Tile分型:C型15例,B型1例。观察内容包括螺钉置入时间,螺钉置入准确率,术中失血量,神经、血管、脏器损伤情况,术后骨折复位情况等。导航下经皮微创螺钉固定方法包括骶髂螺钉固定、耻骨支空心钉固定、耻骨联合分离空心钉固定。16例患者中单纯骶髂螺钉固定4例;骶髂螺钉固定、耻骨支空心钉固定、耻骨联合分离空心钉固定2例;骶髂螺钉固定及耻骨支空心钉固定8例;单纯行耻骨支空心钉固定2例。结果:置入螺钉36枚,平均每枚螺钉置入时间约20min,术中出血10～20ml。术后骨盆X线片及三维CT显示,所有骨折良好复位,螺钉无错误置入。伤口均Ⅰ期愈合,无伤口感染及固定失败;术后均未出现神经、血管及其他脏器损伤。结论:导航下经皮微创螺钉内固定治疗骨盆骨折具有创伤小、术中失血少、手术并发症发生率低、固定可靠、无须输血等优点,能很好地重建骨盆环的稳定性,但是对术者的技术要求较高,应注意充分的术前准备。     

寰枢椎脱位后路螺钉固定方法的临床选择

目的 探讨寰枢椎脱位后路钉棒固定术中寰椎螺钉和枢椎螺钉固定方法 的临床选择.方法 对2002 年11 月至2011 年12 月广州军区广州总医院收治的228 例可复性和23 例难复性寰枢椎脱位患者,术前进行置钉可行性和复位可能性评估,针对性地选择寰椎和枢椎的后路螺钉固定方法,进行寰枢椎后路钉棒固定治疗.结果 251 例患者均行钉棒固定并获得满意复位.寰椎螺钉固定采用椎弓根螺钉403 枚、部分经椎弓根螺钉77 枚、侧块螺钉22 枚;枢椎螺钉固定采用椎弓根螺钉437 枚、椎板螺钉56 枚、侧块螺钉9 枚.术中未发生椎动脉、脊髓损伤.237 例患者获得随访,随访时间4～38 个月,平均随访时间13 个月.230 例患者获骨性融合;6例为纤维愈合,动力位片（均随访2 年以上）未见复发脱位;另1 例为假关节未融合并双侧枢椎椎弓根螺钉松动,行后路翻修手术治愈.结论 根据寰枢椎脱位的复位难易程度和个体解剖特点灵活选择寰椎和枢椎不同的后路螺钉固定方法,扩大了寰枢椎后路钉棒固定技术的适用范围,提高了手术安全性和成功率.     

骨盆后环损伤内固定重建方法的选择

目的 探讨选择骨盆后环损伤内固定的重建方法。方法 2000年5月～2005年6月，对40例骨盆后环骨折脱佗患者采用内同定重建手术，其中男28例，女12例。年龄21～58岁。致伤原因：车祸伤23例，压碰伤11例，坠落伤6例。骨盆后环损伤情况：骶髂关节脱位22例，骶骨骨折伴脱位12侧，髂翼侧骨折伴脱位6例。按Denis等（1988）分类标准，骶骨Ⅰ区骨折6例，Ⅱ区骨折3例，Ⅲ区骨折3例。其中合并骨盆前环骨折：耻骨联合分离14例，单侧耻骨上、下支骨折10例，双侧耻骨上、下支骨折8例，同侧髋臼骨折4例，同侧髋臼骨折合并对侧耻骨卜下支骨折3例，对侧髋臼骨折1例。丁伤后24h～15d手术。分别采用骶髂关节前路钢板内固定28例，骶髂关节后路螺钉内固定2例，采用Galveston技术联合ISOLA系统内同定10例。结果40例均获随访6个月～3年。术前合并骶丛神经损伤3例，术后1例遗留会阴部麻木和尿失禁，1例遗留跛行；后尿道断裂3例，膀胱破裂2例，经手术修补后功能完全恢复；其余患者均恢复满意。结论 对于骨盆后环骨折脱位，应根据骨盆后环骨折的类型，掌握内固定技术的适用范围，选择合适的内固定重建方法。