腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术并发症的预防

目的探讨使用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术的疗效和安全性。减少手术并发症,随访腹腔镜治疗食道裂孔疝的效果。方法对280例食管裂孔疝患者使用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术,其中132例做胃底270°部分折叠术（Toupet术）,148例做胃底360°折叠术（Nissen术）。36例应用补片修补疝缺口,剩余患者采用直接缝合。结果 280例腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术全部获得成功。手术时间30～190min,平均手术时间110min,失血10～50ml;术后24～48h进流质饮食,无术后并发症;术后平均住院5.7d。结论腹腔镜食道裂孔疝修补术具有疗效确定、安全和创伤小的优点。并发症率极低。     

腹腔镜治疗食管裂孔疝的临床应用

目的探讨使用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术的疗效和安全性。方法对26例食管裂孔疝患者使用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术，其中16例做胃底270。部分折叠术（Toupet术），10例做胃底360°胃底折叠术（Nissen术）。19例应用补片修补疵缺口，7例采用7号丝线缝合。结果26例腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术全部获得成功。手术时间30～190min，平均110min，失血10～50ml；术后24～48h进流质饮食，无术后并发症；术后平均住院5．7d。结论26例患者的反酸症状均在24h内缓解，术后停用抗酸药物，修补术具有疗效确定、安全和创伤小的优点。值得进一步推广应用。     

食管裂孔疝的腹腔镜治疗

目的:探讨使用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术的疗效和安全牲.方法:对62例食管裂孔疝患者行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术,其中46例做胃底270o部分折叠术(Toupet术),16例做胃底360o折叠术(Nissen术).21例应用补片修补疝缺口,41例采用7号丝线缝合.随访时间中位数18个月.结果:62例腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术全部成功.手术时间110(30～190)min,失血10～50 mL;术后24～48 h进流质饮食,无术后并发症;术后平均住院5.7 d.结论:腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术具有疗效确定、安全和创伤小的优点,值得进一步推广应用.     

腹腔镜手术治疗食管裂孔疝的42体会

目的探讨使用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术的疗效和安全性。方法对42例食管裂孔疝患者行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术,其中32例行胃底360°折叠术(Nissen术),10例行胃底270°部分折叠术(Toupet术)。39例采用4号丝线缝合修补疝缺口,3例应用补片修补疝缺口。结果42例腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术全部成功。手术时间平均(138±22)min,失血平均(62±16)ml;无术后并发症;术后平均住院(5.2±1.9)d。术后症状完全消失32例(76%),好转10例(24%)。结论腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术具有疗效确定、安全和创伤小的优点,值得进一步推广应用。     

腹腔镜在先天性食管裂孔疝修补术中的应用

目的探讨腹腔镜手术治疗小儿食管裂孔疝的安全性和疗效。方法2001年9月～2008年12月对7例小儿食管裂孔疝施行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合胃底折叠术（Nissen法）。1例因术前上消化道造影发现合并胃排空延迟,联合实施了腹腔镜幽门成形术。1例合并右腹股沟斜疝同时行腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术。1例术中发现合并副脾,未给予处理。结果7例患儿均在腹腔镜下完成食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术（Nissen法）,无中转开腹者。手术时间平均94.2min（75～150min）;术中出血量平均5ml（2～10ml）,无术中术后输血者。术后24～48h进奶或进食。术后住院3～7d,平均4.5d。7例患儿术后随访6～20个月,平均12.6月。1例术后第10天出现呕吐,给予食管扩张和胃动力药物治疗后好转;1例术后1年复发,再次行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合Nissen胃底折叠术治愈;其余5例术后恢复顺利,无并发症发生。结论腹腔镜治疗食管裂孔疝创伤小,安全性好,疗效确切,可以联合治疗其他疾病,应注意适应证的选择。     

胃食管反流病的腹腔镜外科治疗

目的:探讨腹腔镜手术治疗胃食管反流病的临床效果.方法:回顾性分析2008年1月—2011年9月对33例胃食管反流病患者行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补和胃底折叠术的临床资料.腹腔镜单纯胃底折叠术5例(Toupet式),腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补加胃底折叠术25例(Nissen式3例,Toupet式22例),腹腔镜单纯食管裂孔疝修补术3例.结果:全组患者手术均获成功,手术时间90～185 min.术后平均住院6d.无中转开腹及死亡病例,无术后严重并发症.术后随访1～24个月,32例临床症状完全消失,1例明显好转.结论:对于胃食管反流性疾病,腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补和胃底折叠术是一种微创、安全、有效的治疗方法.     

腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术12例报告

目的:探讨腹腔镜手术治疗食管裂孔疝的可行性及临床价值。方法:为12例食管裂孔疝患者行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术,其中9例行胃底360度折叠术(Nissen术),3例行胃底270度部分折叠术(Toupet术)。8例使用7号丝线缝合修补疝缺口,4例应用补片修补。结果:12例手术均获成功,无一例中转开腹。手术时间62～215 min,平均(116±23)min;术中出血量10～20 ml,平均(12±2.4)ml;术后住院3～19 d,平均(5.1±1.3)d;无严重并发症发生及死亡病例。术后症状完全消失9例(75%),好转3例(25%)。结论:腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术安全,疗效确定,患者创伤小,值得临床应用。     

腹腔镜胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病

目的探讨腹腔镜胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病的临床效果。方法2008年1月-2011年11月对40例胃食管反流病行腹腔镜胃底折叠术。腹腔镜单纯胃底折叠术7例（Toupt式）,腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补加胃底折叠术33例（Nissen式5例,Toupet式28例）。结果手术均获成功,无中转开腹及死亡病例,无术后严重并发症。手术时间75～215min,平均112min;术中出血量10-350ml,平均52ml;术后住院5—10d,平均7d。40例术后随访1—24个月,平均16个月,34例临床症状完全消失,6例症状明显好转。结论腹腔镜胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病疗效满意。     

腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术的临床疗效评价

目的:评价腹腔镜Nissen手术在治疗食管裂孔疝中的优越性。方法:应用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补和胃底折叠术治疗31例食管裂孔疝患者。结果:本组患者手术均获成功,仅1例发生纵隔气肿。术后随访6个月~7年,临床症状完全消失,无一例复发。结论:腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补和胃底折叠术具有患者创伤小、痛苦少、住院时间短等优点,是当今治疗食管裂孔疝手术的金标准。     

超重患者胃食管反流病的腹腔镜治疗

目的 探讨腹腔镜手术治疗超重患者胃食管反流病（gastroesophageal reflux disease,GERD）的临床效果.方法 2008年1月~2013年1月,对23例体重指数（BMI）26.1~29.7的超重GERD患者行腹腔镜治疗.单纯胃底折叠术5例（Toupet式）,18例合并食管裂孔疝者行食管裂孔疝修补加胃底折叠术（Nissen式4例,Toupet式14例）.结果 全组手术均获成功,手术时间85~225 min,平均117 min;术中出血量30~200 ml,平均70 ml;术后住院时间4~8 d,平均7 d.无中转开腹及死亡,无术后严重并发症.术后随访1~24个月,平均14个月,其中15例〉12个月,21例治愈,2例缓解.结论 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补和胃底折叠术治疗超重GERD患者效果满意.     

腹腔镜下Toupet胃底折叠术式治疗食管裂孔疝的临床应用

目的 探讨使用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术的疗效和安全性.方法 对61例食管裂孔疝患者使用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术,做胃底270°部分折叠术(Toupet术),19例应用补片修补疝缺口,42例采用直接线缝合.结果 61例腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术全部获得成功.手术时间30～190 rain,平均手术时间110 min,失血10～50 mL;术后24～48 h进流质饮食,无术后并发症;术后平均住院5.7 d.结论 61例患者的反酸症状均在24 h内缓解,术后停用抗酸药物,修补术具有疗效确定、安全和创伤小的优点,值得进一步推广应用.     

腹腔镜治疗成人食管裂孔疝手术适应证的选择(附20例报告)

目的探讨腹腔镜修补术治疗食管裂孔疝的适应证,总结相关临床治疗经验。方法回顾性分析武汉市中心医院疝与腹壁外科自2013年1月至2015年6月期间收治的20例食管裂孔疝病人的临床资料。结果 20例病人均行腹腔镜疝修补治疗,临床症状好转出院,其中14例行补片修补,6例行单纯缝合修补。手术时间为40~120 min,平均手术时间为75 min;失血量为10~50 ml,平均为25 ml;住院时间为3~8 d,平均为4.5 d;术后无严重并发症。术后1个月复查上消化道钡餐检查均显示疝囊复位良好。术后随访1年半,未见症状复现及疝复发。结论合理选择手术适应证是腹腔镜治疗食管裂孔疝的关键。     

Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias

The advent of minimally invasive techniques has brought about a shift in the operative approach of patients with paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Today, the laparoscopic repair of a paraesophageal hiatal hernia has almost completely replaced the open approach through either a laparotomy or a left thoracotomy. The laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias is a technically challenging operation; however, it is technically feasible and safe, and it is associated with a positive relief of symptoms, decreased postoperative pain, and a rapid return to normal activities (1, 2). This paper describes, step by step, our approach to the laparoscopic repair of a paraesophageal hiatal hernia.     

Anterior gastropexy may reduce the recurrence rate after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair

Background: Although laparoscopic repair of type 3 paraesophageal hernias is safe and results in symptomatic relief, recent data have questioned the anatomic integrity of the laparoscopic approach. The reports document an asymptomatic recurrence rate as high as 42% with radiologic follow-up evaluation for type 3 paraesophageal hernias repaired laparoscopically. This disturbingly high recurrence rate has prompted the addition of an anterior gastropexy to our standard laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Methods: A prospective series of 28 patients underwent laparoscopic repair of large type 3 hiatal hernias between July 2000 and January 2002 at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation by one surgeon. All the patients underwent reduction of the hernia, sac excision, crural repair, antireflux procedure, and anterior gastropexy. They all had a video esophagram 24 h after surgery, then at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits and annually thereafter. Symptomatic outcomes were assessed with a standard questionnaire at each follow-up visit. Results: In this study, 21 women and 7 men with a mean age of 67 years (range, 35–82 years) underwent successful laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. The mean operative time was 146 min (range, 101–186 min), and the average blood loss was 71 ml (range, 10–200 ml). One intraoperative complication occurred: A small esophageal mucosal tear occurred during esophageal dissection and was repaired laparoscopically. At 24 h, upper gastrointestinal examination identified no leaks. At this writing, all the patients have undergone video esophagram at a 3-month follow-up visit. All were asymptomatic and all examinations were normal. Of the 28 patients, 27 have undergone follow-up assessment at 6 months. At this writing, all the patients have undergone video esophagram at 3, 6, and 12 months follow up visits. All were asymptomatic and all examinations were normal. Ten patients have completed 2 year follow up barium swallows with no recurrences. Conclusions: With up to 2 years of follow-up evaluation, the addition of an anterior gastropexy to the laparoscopic repair of type 3 hiatal hernias resulted in no recurrences. These encouraging results necessitate further follow-up evaluation to document the long-term effects of anterior gastropexy in reducing postoperative recurrence after laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias.     

Simultaneous laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair and sleeve gastrectomy in the morbidly obese

BackgroundMorbid obesity is associated with increased rates of hiatal and paraesophageal hernias. Although laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is gaining popularity as the procedure of choice for morbid obesity, there is little data regarding the management of paraesophageal hernias found intraoperatively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of a combined sleeve gastrectomy and paraesophageal hernia repair in morbidly obese patients.MethodsFrom May 2011 to February 2013, 23 patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with the repair of a paraesophageal hernia. Only 4 patients had a large hiatal hernia documented preoperatively on esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The body mass index (BMI), operative time, length of stay, and complications were evaluated.ResultsThe average operative time was 165 minutes (115–240 minutes) and length of stay was 2.83 days (2–6 days). All patients were female except for one, with an average age of 53.4 years and a BMI of 41.9 kg/m². There were no complications during the procedures. Mean follow-up was 6.16 months (1–19 months), and mean excess weight loss was 39%. The average cost of admission for a combined procedure ($10,056), was slightly higher than a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy ($8905) or laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair ($8954) done separately.ConclusionsLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with a paraesophageal hernia repair is well-tolerated and feasible in morbidly obese patients. Surgeons should be aware that preoperative EGD is not effective at diagnosing large hiatal or paraesophageal hernias. Surgeons with the skill set to repair paraesophageal hernias should do a combined procedure because it is well-tolerated, feasible, and can reduce the cost of multiple hospital admissions.     

Paraesophageal hernia

The laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia has proven to be safe and effective, with relatively low morbidity and mortality rates. The laparoscopic approach is feasible in patients with paraesophageal hernia because these patients are usually past middle age and commonly have multiple other medical problems. The procedure is technically demanding, but skilled laparoscopic surgeons should be able to perform the standard repair, that is, sac excision, crural closure, and fundoplication or gastropexy.     

Open versus Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair

Background:

The literature reports the efficacy of the laparoscopic approach to paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair. However, its adoption as the preferred surgical approach and the risks associated with paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair have not been reviewed in a large database.

Method:

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample dataset was queried from 1998 to 2005 for patients who underwent repair of a complicated (the entire stomach moves into the chest cavity) versus uncomplicated (only the upper part of the stomach protrudes into the chest) paraesophageal hiatal hernia via the laparoscopic, open abdominal, or open thoracic approach. A multivariate analysis was performed controlling for demographics and comorbidities while looking for independent risk factors for mortality.

Results:

In total, 23,514 patients met the inclusion criteria. By surgical approach, 55% of patients underwent open abdominal, 35% laparoscopic, and 10% open thoracic repairs. Length of stay was significantly reduced for all patients after laparoscopic repair (P < .001). Age ≥60 years and nonwhite ethnicity were associated with significantly higher odds of death. Laparoscopic repair and obesity were associated with lower odds of death in the uncomplicated group.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernia is associated with a lower mortality in the uncomplicated group. However, older age and Hispanic ethnicity increased the odds of death.