Early and late reversal of rocuronium and vecuronium with neostigmine in adults and children.

We investigated the influence of the timing of neostigmine administration on recovery from rocuronium or vecuronium neuromuscular blockade. Eighty adults and 80 children were randomized to receive 0.45 mg/kg rocuronium or 0.075 mg/kg vecuronium during propofol/fentanyl/N2O anesthesia. Neuromuscular blockade was monitored by train-of-four (TOF) stimulation and adductor pollicis electromyography. Further randomization was made to control (no neostigmine) or reversal with 0.07 mg/kg neostigmine/0.01 mg/kg glycopyrrolate given 5 min after relaxant, or first twitch (T1) recovery of 1%, 10%, or 25%. Another eight adults and eight children received 1.5 mg/kg succinylcholine. At each age, spontaneous recovery of T1 and TOF was similar after rocuronium and vecuronium administration but was more rapid in children (P < 0.05). Spontaneous recovery to TOF0.7 after rocuronium and vecuronium administration in adults was 45.7 +/- 11.5 min and 52.5 +/- 15.6 min; in children, it was 28.8 +/- 7.8 min and 34.6 +/- 9.0 min. Neostigmine accelerated recovery in all reversal groups (P < 0.05) by approximately 40%, but the times from relaxant administration to TOF0.7 were similar and independent of the timing of neostigmine administration. Recovery to T1 90% after succinylcholine was similar in adults (9.4 +/- 5.0 min) and children (8.4 +/- 1.1 min) and was shorter than recovery to TOF0.7 in any reversal group after rocuronium or vecuronium administration. Recovery from rocuronium and vecuronium blockade after neostigmine administration was more rapid in children than in adults. Return of neuromuscular function after reversal was not influenced by the timing of neostigmine administration. These results suggest that reversal of intense rocuronium or vecuronium neuromuscular blockade need not be delayed until return of appreciable neuromuscular function has been demonstrated. Implications: These results suggest that reversal of intense rocuronium or vecuronium neuromuscular blockade need not be delayed until return of appreciable neuromuscular function has been demonstrated. Although spontaneous and neostigmine-assisted recovery is more rapid in children than in adults, in neither is return of function as rapid as after succinylcholine administration.     

Postoperative residual curarization with cisatracurium and rocuronium infusions

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Monitoring of neuromuscular blockade still often relies on clinical judgement. Moreover, there are substantial national differences in the use of agents to 'reverse' their effects. We investigated the recovery characteristics and incidence of postoperative residual curarization after cisatracurium and rocuronium infusions for long duration interventions without systematic antagonism. METHODS: In 30 patients undergoing major surgery, we measured infusion dose requirements for rocuronium and cisatracurium during propofol anaesthesia. Infusions were discontinued at the beginning of surgical closure; spontaneous recovery of neuromuscular function was awaited in both groups. Neostigmine (50 microg kg(-1)) was administered only when a patient started to wake without a train-of-four ratio (TOF) of 0.9. RESULTS: In the cisatracurium and rocuronium groups, four (27%) and one (7%) patients, respectively, had a TOF ratio > or = 0.9 at the end of surgery. The TOF ratio in each group at that time was 51 +/- 32% for cisatracurium and 47 +/- 31% for rocuronium (P = 0.78). Six patients (40%) in the cisatracurium group and seven (47%) in the rocuronium group required neostigmine. The TOF ratio at the time of reversal was 63 +/- 7% for cisatracurium and 40 +/- 19% for rocuronium (P = 0.01). The time interval between the end of surgery and a TOF ratio of 0.9 was 10 +/- 9 min for cisatracurium and 18 +/- 13 min for rocuronium (P = n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving a cisatracurium or rocuronium infusion have a high incidence of postoperative residual curarization when the block is not antagonized. When 'reversal' is not attempted, cisatracurium seems to be safer than rocuronium.     

Reversal of intense neuromuscular blockade following infusion of atracurium

In order to evaluate reversal time from very intense neuromuscular blockade caused by a continuous infusion of atracurium, the time course of neostigmine induced reversal from different levels of neuromuscular blockade was evaluated using the post-tetanic count (PTC) and the train-of-four (TOF) in 30 patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide, fentanyl, and thiopental. Reversal time (time from administration of neostigmine at different PTC levels to a TOF ratio of 0.7) was found to depend upon the degree of blockade at the time of reversal. Median reversal time from a PTC of 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-8, 9-10, 11-12, and greater than 13 (but less than 10% twitch height) to a TOF ratio of 0.7 was 31, 23, 19, 18, 14, and 13 min, respectively. Spontaneous recovery from PTC level of 1-2, when atracurium infusion was stopped, to a PTC level at which antagonism was induced and reversal time were both correlated to the square root of the PTC. Total recovery time (spontaneous recovery plus reversal time) was not shortened by an early injection of neostigmine. It is concluded that neostigmine administration during intense neuromuscular blockade following atracurium infusion does not shorten total recovery time and offers no clinical advantages.     

Optimum dose of neostigmine to reverse shallow neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium and cisatracurium

We examined the use of neostigmine for reversing shallow (defined as train‐of‐four ratio of 0.5), cisatracurium‐ and rocuronium‐induced neuromuscular block in 112 patients, by use of 0 μg.kg^?1, 10 μg.kg^?1, 20 μg.kg^?1 or 40 μg.kg^?1 dose of neostigmine for reversal. The times from neostigmine administration to train‐of‐four ratios of 0.7, 0.9 and 1.0 were evaluated. Analysis of variance showed that the duration of action was significantly longer after cisatracurium compared with rocuronium. The time to reach a train‐of‐four ratio of 1.0 was significantly shorter with neostigmine 40 μg.kg^?1 compared with lower neostigmine doses, and at this dose the time did not differ between cisatracurium and rocuronium. The recovery time from a train‐of‐four ratio of 0.5–1.0 did not differ between cisatracurium and rocuronium, and was significantly shortened by the administration of neostigmine. We conclude that a neostigmine dose of 40 μg.kg^?1 was the most effective at reducing recovery time after neuromuscular blockade.     

Accelerated reversal of atracurium blockade with divided doses of neostigmine

The hypothesis that administration of neostigmine in divided doses might accelerate the antagonism of neuromuscular blockade was investigated. Neostigmine 0.05 mg X kg-1 was administered either in a single bolus dose (Group I, n = 16) or in an initial dose of 0.01 mg X kg-1 followed three minutes later by 0.04 mg X kg-1 (Group II, n = 16) for antagonism of atracurium-induced blockade. Reversal was attempted at 10 per cent spontaneous recovery of twitch height. The mean time (+/- SD) from the first injection of the drug until the train-of-four (TOF) ratio value had reached 0.75 was significantly shorter in Group II (p less than 0.05) than in Group I (391.8 +/- 83.3 and 468.6 +/- 150.3 seconds respectively). The rate of TOF ratio recovery was 2.5 times faster after neostigmine administration in divided doses. It is concluded that administration of neostigmine in divided doses, as described in this study, produced a significantly faster reversal of residual atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade as compared to a single bolus administration.     

Reversal of pancuronium

Moderate to deep (67-99% single twitch depression) pancuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade was antagonised with neostigmine (30 micrograms/kg, 60 micrograms/kg, or 80 micrograms/kg) in combination with glycopyrronium. Twenty-seven patients were reversed from 91%-99% twitch depression. Recovery of the first twitch of a train-of-four to 95% of control twitch took at least 20 minutes with neostigmine 30 micrograms/kg. The higher doses were significantly faster (60 micrograms/kg p less than 0.05, 80 micrograms/kg p less than 0.01) and took 15.8 and 14.8 minutes respectively. Reversal to a train of four ratio of 0.75 was not consistently achieved in under 30 minutes with any dose of neostigmine. Nineteen patients were antagonised from a 67%-80% depression of first twitch and in all but two recovery to 95% of control took under 10 minutes. To achieve a train of four ratio of 0.75 took less than 12.5 minutes except in three patients, two of whom, both given neostigmine 30 micrograms/kg, took longer than 20 minutes. Neostigmine 60 micrograms/kg produced as rapid a degree of antagonism as 80 micrograms/kg. Heart rates after reversal decreased gradually in all groups, although the decrease was initially greater in the low dose neostigmine (30 micrograms/kg) group. A fixed 5:1 ratio of neostigmine and glycopyrronium will usually antagonise a moderate (70%-80%) pancuronium block to a train of four of greater than 75% within 12.5 minutes if at least 60 micrograms/kg of neostigmine is administered. More than 30 minutes may be required for reversal whatever the dose of neostigmine, for antagonism from greater than 90% twitch depression.     

Early and late reversal of rocuronium with pyridostigmine during sevoflurane anaesthesia in children

This study investigated the effect of pyridostigmine administered at different levels of recovery of neuromuscular function after rocuronium during sevoflurane anaesthesia in children. Fifty-one patients aged 3 to 10 years, ASA physical status 1 or 2 were randomized to 4 groups: a spontaneous recovery group; or, reversal with pyridostigmine 0.25 mg/kg with glycopyrrolate 0.01 mg/kg at one of three times: 5 minutes after rocuronium administration; at 1% twitch height (T1) recovery; or at a 25% twitch height (T25) recovery. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone (5-7 mg/kg) and maintained with 2-3% sevoflurane and 50% nitrous oxide. Atropine (0.015 mg/kg) and, after calibrating the TOF-Watch, rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) were then administered. Maximal block occurred 1.1+/-0.5 min (mean, SD) after rocuronium administration. In the spontaneous recovery group, the clinical duration (recovery to T25) was 40.1+/-8.8 min and the recovery index (time between T25 and T75) 19.9+/-9.8 min. Recovery to TOF >0.9 from the time of rocuronium administration was reduced by approximately 30% in the pyridostigmine groups compared to the spontaneous recovery group. There was no significant difference among the three pyridostigmine groups. When pyridostigmine was given at T1 or T25, the time from pyridostigmine administration to TOF >0.9 was shorter than for the group receiving pyridostigmine 5 minutes after rocuronium.     

Cisatracurium- and rocuronium-associated residual neuromuscular dysfunction under intraoperative neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative neostigmine reversal: a single-blind randomized trial

BackgroundPostoperative residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB) is a common complication in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), but also one of the most controversial issues. Many studies and trials demonstrated that some methods and techniques can reduce the incidence and the extent of the phenomenon.Study ObjectiveTo determine the incidence of RNMB in the PACU at standardized times after extubation with the implementation of a protocol of careful neuromuscular blockade management.DesignRandomized, single-blinded controlled clinical trial.SettingOperating room and PACU.PatientsA total of 120 patients of either sex with American Society of Anesthesiologists grades 1, 2, and 3, aged 18 to 80 years were scheduled to undergo elective abdominal surgical procedures lasting for at least 60 minutes.InterventionsPatients were randomized to receive either cisatracurium (n = 60) or rocuronium (n = 60) at the time of intubation and during surgery. Every patient received quantitative neuromuscular monitoring during general anesthesia. On completion of surgery, patients were given neostigmine 0.05 mg kg⁻¹. Patients were extubated at a train-of-four (TOF) ratio ≥0.9.MeasurementsTOF measurements were performed 15, 30, and 60 minutes after extubation. Tolerability of neuromuscular monitoring was evaluated with a scale from 1 to 10 (with 1 meaning no discomfort at all and 10 meaning maximal discomfort or pain).ResultsSix, 11, and 14 patients (5.0%, 9.2%, and 11.7%) exhibited a TOF ratio <0.9 at 15, 30, and 60 minutes after extubation, respectively. No statistically significant difference in the postoperative RNMB between cisatracurium and rocuronium was found. The median tolerability score for neuromuscular monitoring was 3.ConclusionCareful conduction, monitoring, and subsequent reversal of neuromuscular block may allow for obtaining considerably low incidence of residual neuromuscular block. However, our trial shows that some mid- and long-term cases of TOF ratios <0.9 can still occur, possibly jeopardizing the patients' postoperative recovery.     

Recovery from vecuronium neuromuscular blockade following neostigmine administration in infants, children, and adults during halothane anesthesia

To determine whether neostigmine had different effects in pediatric patients during vecuronium neuromuscular blockade, the rate of recovery following neostigmine administration was compared in infants (n = 8), children (n = 10), and adults (n = 10) during nitrous oxide-halothane anesthesia. After induction of anesthesia, patients received 100 micrograms/kg of vecuronium. The EMG response of the adductor pollicis was monitored after train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve every 20 s. When the first twitch of TOF spontaneously recovered to 10% of control value, neostigmine was injected (40 micrograms/kg in adults, 30 micrograms/kg in infants and children). During the first few minutes following neostigmine administration, no differences were observed between the three groups. After the 8 min, recovery was more rapid in children than in infants and adults up to and including the 15th min. Ten minutes after neostigmine administration, the first twitch (mean +/- SD) reached 97 +/- 3%, 99 +/- 2%, and 97 +/- 5% of control value in infants, children, and adults, respectively; TOF ratio was greater in children (0.96 +/- 0.03) than in either adults (0.82 +/- 0.17) or in infants (0.83 +/- 0.14) (P less than 0.05). During the first minutes after neostigmine administration, the lack of difference in TOF recovery in the three groups suggests that neostigmine is the main factor of recovery. In contrast, the more complete recovery after the eighth minute in children could be due to the faster rate of spontaneous recovery from vecuronium induced neuromuscular blockade in children.     

Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine antagonism of atracurium and cisatracurium- induced neuromuscular block

PURPOSE: To study the dose-response relationships for neostigmine and edrophonium during antagonism of neuromuscular block induced by atracurium and cisatracurium. METHODS: One hundred and twenty eight, ASA group 1 or 2 adults were given either 0.5 mg x kg(-1) atracurium or 0.1 mg x kg(-1) cisatracurium during fentanyl-thiopental-nitrous oxide-isoflurane anesthesia. The neuromuscular block was measured by an acceleration-responsive transducer. Responses were defined in terms of percent depression in the first twitch (T1) and train-of-four (TOF) response. When spontaneous recovery of first twitch height reached 10% of its initial control value, edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg x kg(-1)) or neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02, or 0.05 mg x kg(-1)) was administered by random allocation. Neuromuscular function in another sixteen subjects was allowed to recover spontaneously. RESULTS: At five minutes, unlike edrophonium, neostigmine was equally effective against atracurium and cisatracurium with respect to T1 recovery. The neostigmine T1-ED50 was 10.3 +/- 1.06 (SEM) microg x kg(-1) after atracurium and 11.2 +/- 1.06) microg x kg(-1) after cisatracurium. The edrophonium ED50 was 157 +/- 1.07 microg x kg(-1) with atracurium and 47.4 +/- 1.07 microg x kg(-1) with cisatracurium, giving a neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios of 15.2 +/- 1.7 and 4.2 +/- 0.41 (P < 0.001) for atracurium and cisatracurium, respectively. At 10 min neostigmine was 13 +/- 1.4 times as potent as edrophonium for achieving 50% TOF recovery after atracurium paralysis. After cisatracurium the potency ratio was 11.8 +/- 1.3 (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were differences at five minutes, neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios at 10 min, were similar in both relaxants studied.     

Effect of neostigmine at different levels of mivacurium-induced neuromuscular blockade

The effectiveness of neostigmine 40 μg/kg for antagonism of two different levels of neuromuscular blockade, induced by a bolus dose of mivacurium 0.15 mg/kg, was studied in 45 patients. The patients were anaesthetized with thiopentone, fentanyl, nitrous oxide in oxygen, and enflurane. Neostigmine was administered at either 10% recovery of the twitch height (TH10) at the adductor pollicis muscle ( n =14) or upon reappearance of the first response at the orbicularis oculi muscle (OO1) after train-of-four (TOF) stimulation ( n = 16), the latter representing a deeper degree of neuromuscular blockade. Fifteen of the 45 patients did not receive neostigmine (control group). Neostigmine administration at OO1 rather than at TH10 at the adductor pollicis muscle caused reversal of neuromuscular blockade to occur 8 min earlier and shortened the time to reach 25% recovery of the twitch height (TH25) at the adductor pollicis muscle by about 5 min, compared with the control group. However, the time needed to reach a T4/T1 ratio ≥0.8 was similar in both the early and late neostigmine administration groups, being 9 min faster than in the control group. It can be concluded that there is no advantage in administering neostigmine at profound neuromuscular blockade to achieve clinically adequate recovery (T4/T1 ratio ≥0.8). However, the time between injection of mivacurium and TH25 may be shortened by using neostigmine at profound neuromuscular blockade, a procedure which may be useful in case of unpredictably difficult intubation, since diaphragmatic movements usually reappear at TH25.     

Neostigmine injected 5 minutes after low-dose rocuronium accelerates the recovery of neuromuscular function

Study ObjectiveTo determine whether neostigmine 5 minutes after 0.4 mg/kg rocuronium accelerates reversal.DesignProspective, randomized, comparative open-label study.SettingOperating room.Patients60 ASA physical status I and II patients, aged 18 to 65 years.InterventionsPatients received 0.4 mg/kg rocuronium during nitrous oxide (N₂O)-propofol-opioid anesthesia. Reversal of neuromuscular blockade was achieved with neostigmine, either at 0.03 mg/kg or 0.05 mg/kg intravenously (IV), together with glycopyrrolate administered 5 minutes after relaxant and compared with spontaneous recovery. Onset, depth, and duration of neuromuscular block, as well as recovery of train-of-four (TOF) to 0.8 and 0.9 were evaluated.Main ResultsTimes to achieve TOF ratios of 0.8 and 0.9 were significantly shorter when 0.03 mg/kg or 0.05 mg/kg neostigmine was administered 5 minutes after administration of rocuronium (20.2 ± 5 min and 22.6 ± 5.9 min or 17.8 ± 4.8 min and 19.4 ± 5.1 min, respectively) compared with controls (36.2 ± 8.5 min and 39.0 ± 8.7 min; P < 0.01). Duration to spontaneous T1 25% recovery after rocuronium was 15.5 ± 6.5 min versus 9.3 ± 2.3 min and 7.7 ± 1.6 min in the treatment groups (P < 0.01). Recovery index (T1 from 25% to 75%) was significantly shorter after neostigmine (7.1 ± 2.4 min and 5.7 ± 4.0 min) versus controls (13.3 ± 8.3 min; P < 0.01). Speed of reversal did not differ significantly between IV neostigmine doses of 0.03 mg/kg or 0.05 mg/kg.ConclusionNeostigmine accelerates recovery when administered 5 minutes after injection of IV rocuronium 0.4 mg/kg.     

A randomised controlled trial comparing sugammadex and neostigmine at different depths of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery*

Deep neuromuscular blockade during certain surgical procedures may improve operating conditions. Sugammadex can be used to reverse deep neuromuscular blockade without waiting for spontaneous recovery. This randomised study compared recovery times from neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg^?1, using sugammadex 4 mg.kg^?1 administered at 1–2 post‐tetanic count (deep blockade) or neostigmine 50 μg.kg^?1 (plus atropine 10 μg.kg^?1) administered at the re‐appearance of the second twitch of a train‐of‐four stimulation (moderate blockade), in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. The primary efficacy variable was the time from the start of sugammadex/neostigmine administration to recovery of the train‐of‐four ratio to 0.9. Patients receiving sugammadex recovered 3.4 times faster than patients receiving neostigmine (geometric mean (95% CI) recovery times of 2.4 (2.1–2.7) and 8.4 (7.2–9.8) min, respectively, p < 0.0001). Moreover, 94% (62/66) of sugammadex‐treated patients recovered within 5 min, vs 20% (13/65) of neostigmine‐treated patients, despite the difference in the depth of neuromuscular blockade at the time of administration of both drugs. The ability to provide deep neuromuscular blockade throughout the procedure but still permit reversal at the end of surgery may enable improved surgical access and an enhanced visual field.     

A comparison of the neuromuscular blocking effects and reversibility of cisatracurium and atracurium

The neuromuscular blocking effects and the reversibility of cisatracurium 0.1 or 0.15 mgkg⁻¹ were compared with those of atracurium 0.5 mgkg⁻¹ during anaesthesia with propofol, nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Neuromuscular block was monitored using train-of-four stimulation while recording the mechanomyographic response of the adductor pollicis muscle. The block was either allowed to recover spontaneously or was antagonised with neostigmine 50 μgkg⁻¹ at 10% or 25% recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four. The median times to maximum block were 2.7, 2.2 and 1.5 min following cisatracurium 0.1 and 0.15 mgkg⁻¹ and atracurium 0.5 mgkg⁻¹, respectively. After cisatracurium 0.1 mgkg⁻¹ had been given, the median time to recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.8 ('adequate recovery') was 74 min during spontaneous recovery, 48 min after reversal with neostigmine when the first twitch of the train-of-four had returned to 10% of control and 50 min after reversal when the first twitch of the train-of-four had returned to 25% of control. These times for cisatracurium 0.15 mgkg⁻¹ and atracurium 0.5 mgkg⁻¹ were 90, 66 and 57 min and 75, 56 and 54 min, respectively. Administration of neostigmine significantly shortened the time to adequate recovery for both drugs but there were no significant differences in the case of either neuromuscular blocking drug between the groups of patients given neostigmine at 10 or 25% recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four.     

Optimum time for neostigmine reversal of atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade

Purpose

The aim of the study was to determine the optimum time for administration of neostigmine during recovery from atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade.

Methods

The study comprised 103 patients anaesthetised with midazolam, fentanyl, thiopentone, halothane, and nitrous oxide. Relaxation was induced with atracurium 0.5 mg·kg^?1 and maintained with supplements of 0.15 mg·kg^?1. The ulnar nerve was stimulated with train-of-four (TOF) and double burst stimulation (DBS). Evoked MMG responses were recorded. Patients were randomized to spontaneous recovery (n = 20) or to assisted recovery by neostigmine (0.07 mg ·kg^?1) at varying intervals (6–50 min) from the last atracurium dose (n = 83).

Results

The reversal time (time from administration of neostigmine to TOF ratio 0.7) was always < 13 min, when T₁ (first twitch in TOF) was detectable or when D₁ (first twitch in DBS) was > 5%. Total assisted recovery time (time from last supplemental atracurium dose to TOF ratio 0.7) increased with increasing T₁ and D₁ twitch heights (P < 0.05). The curve fitted to the scattergram with total assisted recovery time vs time from last atracurium supplement to neostigmine administration decreased to reach a minimum after which it increased to approach the line of identity. The minimum of the curve (total assisted recovery time 30.7 min) was reached when neostigmine was given 18.6 min after last atracurium supplement. At this time the T₁ and D₁ twitch height averaged 4 and 8% respectively. If prolongation of the minimum total recovery time of 2.5% is accepted, neostigmine can be given at T₁ and D₁ twitch height values of 0 to 8% and 4 to 15%, respectively.

Conclusion

The optimum time for neostigmine administration, taking both the reversal time and total recovery time into consideration, is when 0 < T₁ < 8% or when 5 < D₁ < 15%. Giving neostigmine at more profound degrees of blockade prolongs reversal time, while giving neostigmine later in the recovery phase prolongs total recovery time.     

Residual paralysis induced by either vecuronium or rocuronium after reversal with pyridostigmine

We investigated postoperative residual curarization after administration of either vecuronium or rocuronium with reversal by pyridostigmine in 602 consecutive patients without perioperative neuromuscular monitoring. On arrival in the recovery room, neuromuscular function was assessed both by acceleromyography in a train-of-four (TOF) pattern and also clinically by the ability to sustain a head-lift for >5 s and the tongue-depressor test. Postoperative residual curarization was defined as a TOF ratio <0.7. One fifth of 602 patients (vecuronium, 24.7%; rocuronium, 14.7%) had a TOF <0.7 in the recovery room. There were no significant differences in the TOF ratios between 10 mg and 20 mg of pyridostigmine. The patients with residual block had several associated factors: the absence of perioperative neuromuscular monitoring, the use of pyridostigmine, which is less potent than neostigmine, a larger dose of vecuronium, shorter time from the last neuromuscular blocker to TOF monitoring, or peripheral cooling. We conclude that significant residual neuromuscular block after vecuronium or rocuronium was not eliminated even with reversal by a large dose of pyridostigmine. IMPLICATIONS: Without monitoring, the significant residual neuromuscular block after vecuronium or rocuronium is not eliminated even by reversal with a large dose of pyridostigmine and can still be a problem in the recovery room.     

Acceleromyography in neonates and small infants: baseline calibration and recovery of the responses after neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium

BACKGROUND: We have evaluated the use of the TOF-Guard (TOF, train-of-four) acceleromyographic thumb responses to ulnar nerve stimulation in neonates and infants and the return of the responses after neuromuscular blockade. METHODS: Baseline acceleromyographic recording of thumb adduction to ulnar nerve stimulation during volatile anaesthesia was performed in 22 babies aged less than 30 weeks. At the start of stimulation the automatic set-up procedure of the TOF-Guard was used to see if a 100% control twitch height could be achieved. Irrespective of the ability to achieve a 100% control twitch height, TOF stimulation was used thereafter. When no automatic 100% control twitch could be reached, the transducer signal gain factor was set manually to obtain a 100% value. In 14 of the 22 children the recovery after neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium 0.3 mg kg(-1) was recorded. RESULTS: In nine of 22 patients a 100% baseline twitch height was obtained with the automatic set-up. In the other 13 babies the TOF-Guard display indicated that the transducer signal was too low. The mean time to recovery of control twitch to 75% of baseline after rocuronium 0.3 mg kg(-1) was 51 min (SD = 21) and the time to recovery of the TOF ratio to 70% was 49 min (SD = 19). The mean final twitch height and TOF after recovery from rocuronium blockade were 101% (SD = 15) and 92% (SD = 12), respectively. CONCLUSION: The recovery of the responses after neuromuscular blockade to near baseline values shows that acceleromyography can be used to measure neuromuscular block and recovery in neonates and infants.     

Dosage of neostigmine for reversal of rocuronium block from two levels of spontaneous recovery

Spontaneous recovery, and recovery following neostigmine 20, 35 or 50 microgram.kg-1 administered at 10 or 25% of recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four, was assessed in 80 patients after rocuronium administration under continued isoflurane anaesthesia. In an additional 40 patients, isoflurane administration was discontinued and neostigmine 35 or 50 microgram.kg-1 was given at 10 or 25% recovery. The administration of neostigmine reduced the recovery times significantly. A neostigmine dose of 20 microgram.kg-1 resulted in slower recovery compared with the higher doses, particularly when reversal was attempted at a first twitch height of 10%. Higher doses of neostigmine given at a first twitch height of 25% resulted in rapid reversal of block [mean (SD) times of 7.0 (4.8) and 6.4 (1.9) min with the 35 and 50 microgram.kg-1 doses, respectively, for attaining a train-of-four ratio of 0.8]. Discontinuing isoflurane did not alter recovery times. The incidence of emetic symptoms did not differ between groups, including one group that received atropine instead of glycopyrronium in combination with neostigmine. We conclude that rocuronium block can be antagonised safely using a neostigmine dose of 35 microgram.kg-1, although recovery may be slightly slower if administered at a first twitch of 10% of control.     

Timing of reversal with respect to three nerve stimulator end‐points from cisatracurium‐induced neuromuscular block

After elective ear surgery with cisatracurium neuromuscular blockade, 48 adults were randomly assigned to receive neostigmine: (a) at appearance of the fourth twitch of a ‘train‐of‐four’; (b) at loss of fade to train‐of‐four; or (c) at loss of fade to double‐burst stimulation, all monitored using a TOF‐Watch SX^® on one arm. For each of these conditions, the recovery from train‐of‐four (TOF) ratio was measured in parallel objectively using a TOF‐Watch SX placed on the contralateral arm. The median (IQR [range]) time from administration of reversal to a train‐of‐four ratio ≥ 0.9 was 11 (9–15.5 [2–28]) min, 8 (4–13.5 [1–25]) min and 7 (4–10 [2–15]) min in the three groups, respectively. This recovery time was significantly shorter when reversal was given at loss of fade to double‐burst stimulation (c), than when given at the appearance of the fourth twitch (a), p = 0.046. However, the total time to extubation may be unaffected as it takes longer for fade to be lost after double‐burst stimulation than for four twitches subjectively to appear.     

Conditions to optimise the reversal action of neostigmine upon a vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block

Background: Since neostigmine was introduced for reversal of neuromuscular block, there has been controversy about the optimum dose for antagonizing neuromuscular block. The purpose of this study was to characterise recovery of neuromuscular transmission following a vecuronium-induced block 15 min after neostigmine administration using different stimulation patterns, and to determine the effects of different doses of neostigmine given at various pre-reversal twitch heights. Methods: Adductor pollicis (AP) mechanical activity in response to low (0.1 and 2 Hz) and high (50 and 100 Hz) frequency stimulation, was recorded 15 min after 20, 40 and 80 μg/kg neostigmine, given to reverse a vecuronium-induced block at 10, 25 and 50% pre-reversal twitch height (TH). Fifty four ASA class I and II anaesthetised (methohexital, fentanyl, N₂O/O₂) young adult patients were studied and randomly allocated into 9 groups of 6 patients each. Results: In contrast to twitch height (TH) and residual force after 50 Hz, 5 s tetanic stimulation (RF50_Hz), the greater sensitivity of train-of-four (TOF) ratio and residual force after 100 Hz, 5 s tetanic stimulation (RF100_Hz) points out the best reversal conditions (prereversal TH and the optimal neostigmine dose) (P<0.001, two-way analysis of variance). The highest reversal scores (about 0.9 TOF ratio and RF100_Hz) were obtained when 40 μg/ kg of neostigmine was given at 25 and 50% TH. A 0.9 TOF ratio was also observed when 40 μg/kg of neostigmine was given at 10% TH, but, under these conditions, RF100_Hz was only 0.6 (P<0.05, Duncan test). Conclusion: To optimise the reversal action of neostigmine in order to obtain the highest neuromuscular transmission recovery (0.9 TOF ratio and RF100_Hz) during a vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block, the 40 μg/kg dose has to be given at 25 to 50% recovery of TH.