Autologous blood transfusion in revision hip arthroplasty. A prospective, controlled study of 30 patients.

In a prospective, randomized study of the efficacy and effects of autologous blood transfusion in revision hip arthroplasty, 30 patients were randomly allocated into two groups. The Control Group received homologous blood transfusion. The Study Group deposited 2-3 units of blood preoperatively, intraoperative blood salvage was used, and no homologous blood was transfused intraoperatively. There was a smaller postoperative blood loss in the Study Group. The preoperative hemoglobin values were lower in the Study Group, but one week postoperatively they were higher than in the Control Group. The decrease in the values of AT III and protein C was lower in the Study Group. The combination of preoperative blood donation and intraoperative blood salvage reduced blood loss and homologous blood transfusion in revision hip arthroplasty.     

Mannheim concept of preoperative autologous blood donation and perioperative autologous blood transfusion in hip endoprosthesis surgery

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficiency of preoperative autologous deposit and intra- and postoperative cell salvage (CS) to reduce homologous transfusion in hip arthroplasty and revision hip arthroplasty. METHODS: In a retrospective study, the data of 1402 patients scheduled for hip arthroplasty and for revision hip arthroplasty were analysed. RESULTS: 767 women and 635 men, age 62.9 +/- 9.8 years (x +/- s) were included in the study. 1270 were scheduled for hip arthroplasty, 132 for revision hip arthroplasty. Of the autologous donors, 51 patients predeposited four units, 1020 patients three, 204 patients two, 39 patients one unit. 88 patients who had not enrolled in the autologous donation program but received CS served as a control group. Blood loss in autologous donors amounted to 1620 (220-5620) ml in hip arthroplasty and 2830 (950-7910) ml in revision arthroplasty. CS was employed in part of the cases in arthroplasty and in all revision operations. 470 (0-2200) ml and 705 (0-2200) were retransfused. In hip arthroplasty 227 of 1182 patients (19.2%) received homologous blood. Homologous transfusion in patients with coxarthrosis due to acetabular protrusio, avascular necrosis of the femoral head and hip dysplasia showed a trend to higher values. Patients who had donated 3 units and received CS required homologous transfusion in 12.4% of the cases. CS reduced the homolgous transfusion rate significantly if the preoperative hemoglobin concentration was < or = 12 g/dl. A group of autologous donors receiving CS was matched with patients receiving CS only. 12 of 76 (15.8%) vs. 45 of 76 (59.2%) required homologous transfusion. In revision hip arthroplasty 58 of 132 patients (43.9%) required homologous blood. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative deposit reduces homologous transfusion requirements considerably in hip surgery. Under the conditions studied CS should be employed in hip arthroplasty in addition to preoperative deposit if the preoperative hemoglobin concentration falls below 12 g/dl. In revision arthroplasty, 4 or more autologous units should be predeposited and CS should be used regularly.     

Preoperative use of recombinant human erythropoietin before total joint arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Previous reports have suggested that the use of recombinant human erythropoietin is effective for decreasing the need for perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of erythropoietin in combination with, and compared with, preoperative autologous donation for reducing allogeneic blood requirements for total joint arthroplasty. METHODS: Two hundred and forty patients undergoing primary and revision total hip or knee arthroplasty were enrolled into three groups with different treatment regimens: (1) erythropoietin and preoperative autologous donation (Group 1), (2) erythropoietin alone (Group 2), and (3) preoperative autologous donation alone (Group 3). Patients were evaluated with regard to requirements for allogeneic transfusion, change from the baseline to the lowest postoperative hemoglobin value, postoperative complications, and adverse reactions. RESULTS: The rate of allogeneic transfusion was 11% in Group 1 (erythropoietin and preoperative autologous donation) compared with 28% in Group 2 (erythropoietin alone) and 33% in Group 3 (preoperative autologous donation alone). Within Group 1, patients who had a unilateral primary arthroplasty had an allogeneic transfusion rate of 4% and those who had a bilateral or revision arthroplasty had an allogeneic transfusion rate of 17%. In Groups 2 and 3, the allogeneic transfusion rates were 14% and 15%, respectively, for the patients who had a unilateral primary arthroplasty and 35% and 47%, respectively, for those who had a bilateral or revision arthroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative use of erythropoietin in conjunction with preoperative autologous donation reduces the need for allogeneic blood transfusion associated with total joint arthroplasty more effectively than does either erythropoietin or preoperative autologous donation alone.     

Patient factors affecting autologous and allogeneic blood transfusion rates in total hip arthroplasty.

Factors that place patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) at increased risk of receiving an allogeneic or autologous blood transfusion may aid in determining which patients should predonate blood. The records of 354 consecutive patients undergoing THA were retrospectively reviewed to determine patient factors related to transfusion requirement. The risk of transfusion requirement was most strongly correlated with low preoperative hemoglobin level, but also with older age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status rating, female sex, cemented arthroplasty, and revision surgery. These patients were also least likely to predonate blood, likely because of their comorbid status.     

Intraoperative autologous transfusion in orthopaedic patients

The cases of 175 consecutive patients who had intraoperative autologous transfusion during revision total hip arthroplasty, an elective operation on the spine, repair of trauma to the spine, or open reduction of a fracture of the acetabulum were reviewed to evaluate the applicability of this technique in orthopaedic operations. A separate group of forty-one consecutive patients who had open reduction of a fracture of the acetabulum or the spine before the introduction of the autotransfuser was reviewed and compared with the group that had autotransfusion. An autologous blood predeposit program was used for twenty-five of fifty-two patients who had a procedure on the hip and for fifty-one of fifty-five patients who had an elective procedure on the spine. The mean rate of red blood-cell salvage using the autotransfuser was 60 per cent over-all. The mean transfusion requirements were significantly less (p less than 0.001) in all groups of patients in whom the autotransfuser was used. Use of the autotransfuser reduced the mean requirement for banked blood in patients who had a fracture of the acetabulum from 3.8 to 2.3 units per patient, and significantly reduced the mean need for banked blood in individuals who had trauma to the spine from 2.7 to 1.8 units per patient (p less than 0.01). The use of prebanked autologous blood further reduced the mean requirement for homologous blood from 2.4 to 0.8 unit per patient in those who had revision total hip arthroplasty (p less than 0.005), and from 3.6 to 0.4 unit per patient in those who had an elective procedure on the spine (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Intraoperative autotransfusion is associated with modest reduction of allogeneic transfusion in prosthetic hip surgery

Background: The efficacy of intraoperative salvage and washing of wound blood and the predictors of allogeneic red cell transfusions in prosthetic hip surgery are insufficiently known.
Methods: In 96 patients, undergoing primary or revision surgery, salvaged and washed red cells and, if necessary, allogeneic blood were used to keep haematocrit not lower than 33%. The bleeding of red cells during hospital stay was calculated from the red cell balance. The preoperative red cell reserve (millilitres of red cells in excess of a haematocrit of 33%) was estimated and the difference between this volume and the total bleeding of red cells was retrospectively used to classify patients with regard to the need for red cells. Stepwise regression analysis was used to define patient-related variables associated with allogeneic blood transfusion.
Results: Preoperative knowledge of the type of operation (primary, revision), the preoperative red cell reserve, and the body mass could predict roughly half of the need for banked blood (r²=0.45). Only one-third of the total bleeding of red cells was retransfused. For complete avoidance of allogeneic blood, autotransfusion was most effective in patients with a moderate need (0–4 u). However, 32% of such patients required allogeneic blood.
Conclusions: Autotransfusion has a limited efficacy to decrease the need for allogeneic blood, and other blood-saving methods should be added for this purpose. It is difficult to predict the need for allogeneic blood preoperatively.     

Efficacy of postoperative blood salvage following total hip arthroplasty in patients with and without deposited autologous units

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing total hip replacement routinely receive perioperative blood transfusions, increasing their risk of blood-borne disease, isoimmunization, anaphylactic reaction, and hemolytic reaction. The purpose of this retrospective, case-control study was to evaluate the effect of postoperative blood salvage on the need for allogeneic transfusion following total hip replacement. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of ninety consecutive patients who, during a twelve-month period, had undergone unilateral, elective total hip replacement that included use of a postoperative blood salvage device. For comparison, we reviewed the medical records of ninety consecutive patients who had undergone total hip replacement without postoperative blood salvage. Overall, 156 patients had complete medical records and were included in the study. RESULTS: Eight (10 percent) of the patients who had been treated with a drain and seventeen (23 percent) of the patients who had been treated without a drain received allogeneic transfusions. Of the nineteen patients who had not deposited autologous blood, all six without postoperative blood salvage required allogeneic transfusion. With control for other variables in the model, regression analysis showed a significantly increased risk of allogeneic transfusion among patients who had undergone total hip replacement without postoperative blood salvage (p = 0.0028) and without having predonated autologous units (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a limited sample size, the study results showed that postoperative blood salvage significantly reduced the risk of allogeneic transfusion among patients managed with total hip replacement, whether or not they had deposited autologous blood (p < 0.0001). With control for donated units, age, gender, preoperative hematocrit, intraoperative blood loss, and cementless technique, patients who were treated without postoperative blood salvage were approximately ten times more likely to require allogeneic transfusion than were patients who had a drain.     

Blood conservation in major orthopedic surgery

During an eight-year period, intraoperative autotransfusion was performed in 1922 operations. There were 476 primary hip arthroplasties, 1017 revision hip arthroplasties, 339 spinal procedures, and 90 vascular cases. There were no known complications related to autotransfusion in any of the cases. With proper technique, red cell salvage is approximately 58% effective, and intraoperative blood loss can be reduced by that amount. The first four years' experience with the preoperative autogeneic blood program is as follows. Using a combined program of predonation and primary hip arthroplasty, 72% of the revision hip arthroplasties and 81% of the spinal instrumentations required only autologous blood. A combined program of autologous donation and intraoperative autotransfusion is an excellent alternative to allogeneic blood replacement and a means of eliminating transfusion-related disease.     

Efficacy of intraoperative blood collection and reinfusion in revision total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty frequently require perioperative blood transfusion, increasing the risk for blood-borne disease and anaphylactic and hemolytic reactions. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of intraoperative blood collection and reinfusion on net blood loss in patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty. METHODS: The medical records of 126 patients who had had a revision total hip arthroplasty with intraoperative blood salvage, with use of a collection and reinfusion device, during a twenty-eight-month period were reviewed. For comparison, the medical records of ninety-six patients who had undergone revision hip arthroplasty without intraoperative blood salvage were reviewed. Each of the 222 patients was categorized into a group on the basis of the type of revision. RESULTS: Patients who had a revision of the femoral and acetabular components (Group C) had significantly higher mean intraoperative and total blood loss than did those who had a revision of the femoral component only (Group A [p = 0.009 and p = 0.02, respectively]) or a revision of the acetabular component only (Group B [p = 0.0001 for both]). Total blood loss was not significantly different between Groups A and B. The mean amount of blood reinfused intraoperatively was 356 mL for the patients in Group A, 374 mL for the patients in Group B, and 519 mL for the patients in Group C. Regression analysis showed a significant decrease in net blood loss with intraoperative collection and reinfusion in Groups B (p = 0.002) and C (p = 0.0001) but not in Group A. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative collection and reinfusion substantially decreased net perioperative blood loss in patients who had a revision of both components (Group C) and in those who had a revision of the acetabular component (Group B). The use of intraoperative blood collection and reinfusion appears to be a valuable method of preserving blood volume in the perioperative period.     

Blood management for patients with hemoglobin level lower than 130 g/l in total knee arthroplasty

Introduction The risk of requiring allogeneic blood transfusion after total knee arthroplasty has been recently decreased with several methods such as blood donation, blood salvage, and hematinic. For patients with a low baseline hemoglobin level, however, the rate of allogeneic transfusion is still high, and an effective method for avoiding allogeneic blood transfusion has not been established. We introduced intra- and postoperative blood salvage with the Cell Saver for patients with a baseline hemoglobin level lower than 130 g/l and analyzed the frequency of allogeneic blood transfusion.Materials and methods From 1993 to 1997, 218 consecutive total knee arthroplasties were performed, and 155 knees with baseline hemoglobin lower than 130 g/l were included in this study. Baseline hemoglobin ranged from 62 to 129 g/l, with a mean of 110 g/l. All patients were managed with intra- and postoperative blood salvage with the Cell Saver. Preoperative autologous blood donation and/or use of hematinic was performed for 129 knees (group 1) and was not performed for 26 knees (group 2). There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to preoperative factors. To examine the role of perioperative factors (age, sex, baseline hemoglobin level, revision procedure, preoperative blood donation, and use of hematinic) in determining the requirements for allogeneic transfusion, backward elimination logistic regression analysis was used.Results Seven knees (4.5%) required allogeneic transfusion. Group 1 (2.3%) exhibited a lower rate of allogeneic blood transfusion than group 2 (15.4%) (p=0.016). Hemoglobin levels on the day (p=0.016), 1 week (p=0.0001), and 2 weeks (p=0.007) after surgery were lower in group 1 than in group 2. Backward elimination logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative blood donation (p=0.048) and use of hematinic (p=0.040) were significantly associated with a requirement for allogeneic blood transfusion.Conclusion Preoperative blood donation and use of hematinic were associated with a low incidence of allogeneic blood transfusion after total knee arthloplasty with intra- and postoperative blood salvage, even for patients with a baseline hemoglobin level below 130 g/l.     

Blood salvage in total hip and knee arthroplasty in a community hospital: a retrospective study

PURPOSES: To assess the results of postoperative and intra-operative blood salvage in patients undergoing total knee and hip arthroplasty, respectively, and to determine if both methods of blood salvage reduce allogeneic transfusion. METHODS: Of 229 patients who attempted blood salvage, 114 of 152 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty received the salvaged blood postoperatively, 35 of 77 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty received the salvaged blood intra-operatively. Various data were collected to assess whether certain factors resulted in autologous and/or allogeneic blood transfusions. RESULTS: Patients that received postoperative salvaged blood after total knee arthroplasty generally had higher postoperative levels of haemoglobin and haematocrit compared to those who did not. Patients with autologous blood transfusion following cemented knee surgery were less likely to require allogeneic blood transfusion. For hip arthroplasty patients, postoperative levels of haemoglobin and haematocrit were similar in both groups who received and did not receive salvaged blood. Lower preoperative haemoglobin and haematocrit levels correlated with a greater likelihood of autologous and/or allogeneic blood transfusion for both knee and hip arthroplasty patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although total knee arthroplasty patients who received salvaged blood had higher haemoglobin levels on the first postoperative day, the receipt of salvaged blood did not significantly reduce the incidence of allogeneic blood transfusion, because salvaged blood was a kind of blood loss. However, reinfusion of salvaged blood may reduce the number of units of allogeneic blood used. Given the short supply of allogeneic blood and its risks of transmitting disease, intra-operative and postoperative blood salvage carries clear advantages.     

Perioperative blood salvage as an alternative to predonating blood for primary total knee and hip arthroplasty

A total of 200 consecutive patients who underwent primary total knee or hip arthroplasty were reviewed to assess the efficacy of perioperative blood salvage and retransfusion. Five of 132 (3.8%) patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty and 3 of 68 (4.4%) patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty required allogeneic transfusion in addition to retransfusion of salvaged autologous blood. The risk of receiving allogeneic transfusion in addition to retransfusion of salvaged blood was 1.2% (2 of 173) in patients with a preoperative hematocrit of > or=37%. The risk of requiring allogeneic transfusion was 22% (6 of 27) in patients with a preoperative hematocrit of 37%.     

Intraoperative autologous transfusion in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty

Significant blood loss during total hip arthroplasty is usually unavoidable. Blood loss is even more of a problem during revision total hip arthroplasty. Using the Cell-Saver for retrieval of red blood cells to be used for autotransfusion during surgery is a safe and useful way of sparing donor blood transfusion. This is a retrospective analysis of primary and revision total hip arthroplasty cases and comparison between cases in which Cell-Saver was used versus those in which Cell-Saver was not used. Generally accepted standards to determine the need for blood transfusion, including measured serum hemoglobin and patient symptoms and vital signs, were used as guidelines in treating patients. Using multiple regression models and taking into account certain variables between cases, it was determined that a significant amount of donor blood transfusion can be saved when the Cell-Saver is used. The Cell-Saver is an important aid in intraoperative treatment for both primary and revision total hip arthroplasty cases.     

The effect of spinal anesthesia on blood transfusion rate in total joint arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients often receive allogeneic blood transfusion. The use of regional anesthesia (RA) is thought to protect against the need for blood transfusion, but many randomized trials of RA in TJA have not reached this conclusion unanimously. We sought to describe the effect of RA on allogeneic transfusion in a large retrospective TJA series. METHODS: We examined data from all TJAs performed in Edmonton, Alberta, in the year 2000 (n = 1875) and used logistic regression modelling to determine the relation between the use of RA and allogeneic transfusion. RESULTS: Twenty-eight percent of TJA subjects received an allogeneic transfusion. Transfusion was independently associated with increasing age, decreasing body mass, decreasing preoperative hemoglobin, female sex, increased comorbidity and prolonged operative time. After controlling for these factors, we found that the use of RA (in the form of spinal anesthesia) compared with general anesthesia reduced the odds ratio (OR) for transfusion to 0.729 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.559-0.949). This represents the combination of a strong relation between RA and transfusion prevention in hip arthroplasty (OR 0.646, 95% CI 0.443-0.944) and a nonsignificant relation in knee arthroplasty (OR 0.825, 95% CI 0.564-1.208). CONCLUSION: The use of spinal anesthesia protects against allogeneic transfusion in arthroplasty of the hip but not the knee. This is consistent with what is known about the hemodynamic consequences of spinal anesthesia.     

Impact of Red Cell Salvage on Transfusion Requirements during Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery may result in substantial blood loss. Concerns regarding the safety, availability, and acceptability of homologous blood have led to initiatives toward reducing transfusion requirements at the time of aneurysm repair. This study was designed to determine if the routine use of intraoperative red cell salvage and autotransfusion resulted in a reduction in homologous transfusion at our institution. A retrospective review of elective AAA repairs in the years 1987, 1992, and 1997 was carried out. Demographic data, operative details, blood loss, hemoglobin levels, red cell salvage and return volumes, and transfusion requirements were recorded and compared across the study years. From this study we conclude that routine use of red cell salvage and autotransfusion is an effective means for reducing transfusion requirements in elective AAA repair.     

Analysis of transfusion predictors in shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: We are not aware of any previous study that has examined predictive factors for blood transfusion after shoulder arthroplasty. We analyzed the association between clinical factors and the need for postoperative blood transfusion and documented the use and waste of predonated blood in a group of patients managed with shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective study of 119 patients who underwent 124 shoulder arthroplasties (including eighty-seven primary uncomplicated total shoulder arthroplasties, twenty-seven revision or complicated primary total shoulder arthroplasties, and ten hemiarthroplasties) from 2001 to 2004 was performed. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine which clinical variables were predictive of transfusion. RESULTS: A postoperative transfusion was received after thirty-one arthroplasties (25%). The strongest predictor of blood transfusion after shoulder arthroplasty was the preoperative hemoglobin level (likelihood ratio test = 37.8, p < 0.0001). Patients with a preoperative hemoglobin level of between 110 and 130 g/L had a five times greater estimated risk of transfusion than those with a level of >130 g/L (p < 0.001). Gender, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis, comorbid conditions, use of anticoagulants or aspirin, autologous predonation status, type of anesthesia, operative time, and decrease in hemoglobin or hematocrit were not predictors of blood transfusion. One hundred and two (78%) of the 131 predonated autologous units were discarded. Patients with a preoperative hemoglobin level of >130 g/L had the highest percentage of wasted units (90%; fifty-five of sixty-one). Preoperative autologous blood donation did not eliminate the risk of allogeneic blood transfusion in autologous donors. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative hemoglobin level is the strongest predictor of blood transfusion after shoulder surgery, and individuals with a preoperative hemoglobin level of <110 g/L have the highest risk of transfusion. On the basis of these findings, we do not recommend autologous predonation for individuals with a preoperative hemoglobin level of >130 g/L, to avoid unnecessary expense and waste.     

Transfusion needs during intraoperative and immediate postoperative periods in arthroplasty of the hip and knee

OBJECTIVES: To determine the factors associated with immediate perioperative transfusion requirements of hip or knee arthroplasty patients who have not been enrolled in a blood salvage program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study collected demographic (age, sex, weight, height, etc.), physiological (hemoglobin levels, coagulation times, preoperative platelet counts, etc.), clinical history and anesthetic and surgical data (type of anesthesia, surgical diagnosis, duration of procedure) in 112 patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: 19 cases of primary knee arthroplasty, 77 cases of hip arthroplasty and 16 replacements of hip arthroplasty. Logistic regression analysis of the aforementioned variables was performed to search for factors related to transfusional needs during and after hip arthroplasty or after knee arthroplasty, which was performed with a tourniquet applied to render intraoperative transfusion unnecessary. RESULTS: The variables that increased the risk of transfusion during surgery were duration of procedure exceeding 120 min (OR 15.24; p = 0.01) and loss of over 500 ml of blood during surgery (OR 11.4; p = 0.02). The variables associated with perioperative transfusion were loss of over 500 ml in the postanesthetic recovery room (OR 12.6; p < 0.0001), hypotensive episodes during recovery (OR 11.7; p = 0.0001), prosthetic replacement (OR 6.33; p = 0.005), height < 160 cm (OR 5.03; p = 0.02), preoperative hemoglobin level < 13.5 g/dl (OR 4.97; p = 0.02), and surgery for reasons other than osteoarthritis (arthritis, pathological fractures, etc.) (OR 4.60; p = 0.04). Variables associated with transfusion of over two units of packed red cells were a history of neoplastic disease unrelated to arthroplasty (OR 378.67; p = 0.005), prosthetic replacement (OR 49.71; p = 0.009), diabetes (OR 36.49; p = 0.02) and a hypotensive event while in the postanesthetic recovery room (OR 29.12; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that certain modifiable factors increase the risk of blood transfusion in knee and hip arthroplasty. Specifically, they are duration of surgery, intra- and postoperative bleeding, preoperative hemoglobin level and instances of perioperative hypotension. Other factors outside our control are height or patient clinical history.     

Independent Risk Factors for Transfusion in Contemporary Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe incidence of transfusion in contemporary revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains high despite recent advances in blood management, including the use of tranexamic acid. The purpose of this prospective investigation was to determine independent risk factors for transfusion in revision THA.MethodsSix centers prospectively collected data on 175 revision THAs. A multivariable logistic analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for transfusion. Revisions were categorized into subgroups for analysis, including femur-only, acetabulum-only, both-component, explantation with spacer, and second-stage reimplantation. Patients undergoing an isolated modular exchange were excluded.ResultsTwenty-nine patients required at least one unit of blood (16.6%). In the logistic model, significant risk factors for transfusion were lower preoperative hemoglobin, higher preoperative international normalized ratio (INR), and longer operative time (P < .01, P = .04, P = .05, respectively). For each preoperative 1g/dL decrease in hemoglobin, the chance of transfusion increased by 79%. For each 0.1-unit increase in the preoperative INR, transfusion chance increased by 158%. For each additional operative hour, the chance of transfusion increased by 74%. There were no differences in transfusion rates among categories of revision hip surgery (P = .23). No differences in demographic or surgical variables were found between revision types.ConclusionDespite the use of tranexamic acid, transfusions are commonly required in revision THA. Preoperative hemoglobin and INR optimization are recommended when medically feasible. Efforts should also be made to decrease operative time when technically possible.     

Transfusions in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with autologous blood

PURPOSE: Determinants of allogeneic blood use in cardiac surgery include preoperative factors such as female sex, age, body weight, hematocrit and red cell volume. We verified if these variables also predicted the need for allogeneic transfusions when autologous blood is predonated. METHODS: Demographic and intraoperative variables, hemoglobin concentrations and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass with autologous blood predonation were reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression and RECPAM tree-growing analyses were applied to identify the preoperative predictors of allogeneic transfusion in these patients. RESULTS: Data from 230 patients included in our autologous blood program between 1995 and 1998 were analysed. Patients undergoing complex/reoperative surgical procedures and patients over age 64yr with a low red cell volume (<2070ml) undergoing simple procedures were more likely to require allogeneic red cells. Younger patients with a low red cell volume undergoing simple procedures carried an intermediate risk. Allogeneic transfusion was avoided in 95% of patients undergoing simple procedures when red cell volume > or = 2070ml. CONCLUSIONS: In our institution, complex/reoperative surgery, low red cell volume and increased age are the main factors associated with the need for allogeneic red cell transfusion despite autologous blood predonation. Knowledge of the factors that limit the effectiveness of predonation with respect to allogeneic blood exposure should help clinicians decide which cardiac surgical patients should be included in autologous blood programs.