Percutaneous Computed Tomography–guided Renal Mass Radiofrequency Ablation versus Cryoablation: Doses of Sedation Medication Used

PurposeTo compare the amount of sedation medication administered during radiofrequency (RF) ablation versus cryoablation of small renal masses.Materials and MethodsRecords were retrospectively reviewed in patients who underwent percutaneous computed tomography–guided RF ablation and cryoablation of small renal masses from January 2002 to June 2011 for patient and tumor characteristics, amount of medications used for moderate sedation, and complications. Sedation was performed by giving patients titrated doses of midazolam and fentanyl. Additional medications were given if the desired level of sedation was not achieved.ResultsThere were 116 patients who underwent 136 ablation procedures; 71 patients underwent RF ablation, and 65 patients underwent cryoablation. RF ablation was associated with a significantly higher mean dose of fentanyl (mean dose for RF ablation, 236.43 μg; mean dose for cryoablation, 172.27 μg; P<.001). RF ablation was also associated with a higher mean dose of midazolam (mean dose for RF ablation, 4.5 mg; mean dose for cryoablation, 3.27 mg; P<.001). In the RF ablation group, two patients required additional sedation with droperidol. As a result of oversedation, two patients in the RF ablation cohort required sedation reversal with naloxone and flumazenil. None of the patients who underwent cryoablation required sedation reversal. No other sedation-related complications occurred.ConclusionsCryoablation of small renal masses was performed with less sedation medication than RF ablation. This finding suggests renal cryoablation is less painful than RF ablation; however, prospective studies with validated pain scales are needed to confirm these results.     

Radiofrequency Ablation,Cryoablation, and Microwave Ablation for T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Evaluation of Therapeutic and Renal Function Outcomes

PurposeTo compare the therapeutic and renal function outcomes of radiofrequency (RF) ablation, cryoablation, and microwave (MW) ablation for treatment of T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Materials and MethodsA retrospective assessment of 297 patients (mean age 72 years range 24–90 years) with biopsy-proven RCC treated with image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation was performed between October 2006 and December 2016. Mean tumor size was 2.4 cm; mean radius, exophytic/endophytic properties, nearness of tumor to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, hilar tumor touching the main renal artery or vein, and location relative to polar lines; Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical; and c-centrality scores were 6.0, 7.0, and 2.8, respectively. Assessments of adverse events, treatment efficacy, and therapeutic outcomes were performed among RF ablation, cryoablation, and MW ablation. The 2-year disease-free, metastatic-free, and cancer-specific survival rates were tabulated. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was used to assess for treatment related changes in renal function.ResultsA total of 297 T1aN0M0 biopsy-proven RCCs measuring 1.2–3.9 cm were treated with computed tomography–guided RF ablation (n = 244, 82%), cryoablation (n = 26, 9%), and MW ablation (n = 27, 9%). There were no significant differences in patient demographics among the 3 groups (P = .09). Technical success rates were similar among the 3 treatments (P = .33). Primary efficacy at 1 month postablation was more likely to be achieved with RF ablation and MW ablation than with cryoablation. At 2 years’ follow-up, there was no local recurrence, metastatic progression, or RCC-related death observed in the 3 groups. There was no significant change in estimated glomerular filtration rate among the 3 ablation groups compared with baseline at 2-year follow-up (P = .71).ConclusionRF ablation, cryoablation, and MW ablation are equivalent at 2 years for treatment of T1a RCC for therapeutic outcome, stability of renal function, and low adverse event rate.     

Long-Term Survival after Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Pathologically Proven Renal Cell Carcinoma in 100 Patients

PurposeTo determine the long-term survival of patients treated with percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation for pathologically proven renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Materials and MethodsIn this single-center retrospective study, 100 patients with 125 RCCs (100 clear-cell, 19 papillary, and 6 chromophobe) 0.8–8 cm in size treated with RF ablation were evaluated at a single large tertiary-care center between 2004 and 2015. Technical success, primary and secondary technique efficacy, and pre- and postprocedural estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 3–6 months and 2–3 years were recorded. Overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and local tumor progression–free survival were calculated by Kaplan–Meier survival curves. Complications were classified per the Clavien–Dindo system. Statistical testing was done via χ² tests for proportions and paired t test for changes in eGFR. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.ResultsOverall technical success rate was 100%, and primary and secondary technique efficacy rates were 90% and 100%, respectively. Median follow-up was 62.8 months, ranging from 1 to 120 months. The 10-year overall, cancer-specific, and local progression–free survival rates were 32%, 86%, and 92%, respectively. The number of ablation probes used was predictive of residual unablated tumor (P < .001). There were no significant changes in preprocedure vs 2–3-years postprocedure eGFR (65.2 vs 62.1 mL/min/1.73 m²; P = .443). There was a 9% overall incidence of complications, the majority of which were grade I.ConclusionsImage-guided percutaneous RF ablation of RCCs is effective at achieving local control and preventing cancer-specific death within 10 years from initial treatment.     

Percutaneous Cryoablation of Renal Tumors: Is It Time for a New Paradigm Shift?

Purpose

To retrospectively assess long-term outcomes of percutaneous renal cryoablation, including factors affecting complications and local recurrence rates.

Thermal Ablation of T1c Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Assessment of Technical Performance,Procedural Outcome,and Safety of Microwave Ablation,Radiofrequency Ablation,and Cryoablation

Purpose

To evaluate perioperative outcomes of thermal ablation with microwave (MW), radiofrequency (RF), and cryoablation for stage T1c renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Impact on renal function of percutaneous thermal ablation of renal masses in patients with preexisting chronic kidney disease

PurposeTo examine the effect of percutaneous thermal ablation of renal masses on renal function among patients with baseline chronic kidney disease (CKD).Materials And MethodsPatients with baseline CKD (initial glomerular filtration rate [GFR] < 60 mL/min/1.73 m²) who underwent percutaneous cryoablation or radiofrequency (RF) ablation of renal masses were reviewed.ResultsA total of 48 patients with a GRF of 60 mL/min/1.73 m² or lower were treated with renal cryoablation or RF ablation and had follow-up GFR measurement 1 month afterward. Mean patient age was 73 years (range, 47–89 y). Cryoablation was performed in 22 patients and RF ablation was performed in 26. Mean tumor diameter was 3.4 cm (range, 0.9–10.2 cm). Mean overall GFRs were 39.8 mL/min/1.73 m² at baseline and 39.7 mL/min/1.73 m² at 1 month after ablation (P = .85). A total of 38 patients had 1-year follow-up GFR measurement (cryoablation, n = 18; RF ablation, n = 20), and their mean GFR was 40.9 mL/min/1.73 m² ± 11.4 (SD), compared with a preablation GFR of 41.2 mL/min/1.73 m²(P = .79). In the cryoablation group, mean GFRs at 1 month and 1 year were 41.4 mL/min/1.73 m² and 44.4 mL/min/1.73 m², compared with respective baseline GFRs of 41.1 mL/min/1.73 m² and 42.1 mL/min/1.73 m² (P = .75 and P = .19, respectively). In the RF ablation group, mean GFRs at 1 month and 1 year were 38.2 mL/min/1.73 m² and 37.8 mL/min/1.73 m², compared with respective baseline GFRs of 38.7 mL/min/1.73 m² and 40.4 mL/min/1.73 m² (P = .58 and P = .09, respectively).ConclusionsIndependent of ablation modality, percutaneous renal mass ablation does not appear to affect renal function among patients with CKD.     

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Stage I Renal Cell Carcinoma: National Treatment Trends and Outcomes Compared to Partial Nephrectomy and Thermal Ablation

PurposeTo assess use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and compare outcomes with thermal ablation and partial nephrectomy (PN).Materials and MethodsThe 2004–2015 National Cancer Database was investigated for histopathologically proven stage I RCC treated with PN, cryoablation, radiofrequency (RF) or microwave (MW) ablation, or SBRT. Patients were propensity score–matched to account for potential confounders, including patient age, sex, race, comorbidities, tumor size, histology, grade, tumor sequence, administration of systemic therapy, treatment in academic vs nonacademic centers, treatment location, and year of diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier plots, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsA total of 91,965 patients were identified (SBRT, n = 174; PN, n = 82,913; cryoablation, n = 5,446; RF/MW ablation, n = 3,432). Stage I patients who received SBRT tended to be older women with few comorbidities treated at nonacademic centers in New England states. After propensity score matching, a cohort of 636 patients was obtained with well-balanced confounders between treatment groups. In the matched cohort, OS after SBRT was inferior to OS after PN and thermal ablation (PN vs SBRT, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19–0.46, P < .001; cryoablation vs SBRT, HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.26–0.60, P < .001; RF/MW ablation vs SBRT, HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.31–0.67, P < .001). Compared with PN, neither cryoablation nor RF/MW ablation showed significant difference in OS (cryoablation vs PN, HR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.80–2.28, P = .258; RF/MW ablation vs PN, HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.95–2.55, P = .079).ConclusionsCurrent SBRT protocols show lower OS compared with thermal ablation and PN, whereas thermal ablation and PN demonstrate comparable outcomes.     

射频消融联合肝动脉栓塞治疗巨大肝血管瘤的效果评价

目的探讨射频消融（RFA）联合肝动脉栓塞（TAE）治疗巨大肝血管瘤（直径≥10 cm）的可行性、安全性及有效性。 方法收集我院2007年10月—2015年5月期间,经TAE序贯RFA治疗15例患者15个巨大肝血管瘤的临床资料。回顾性分析其一般资料、RFA治疗策略、消融相关并发症、完全消融率、消融灶直径变化及复发情况等。 结果所有患者均成功完成RFA联合TAE治疗。TAE后血管瘤的平均直径从（13.0±2.2）cm缩小至（7.1±2.0）cm。RFA治疗后,14个血管瘤（93.3%）获得完全消融。RFA治疗后1个月,消融灶平均直径缩小至（6.1±2.0）cm;6个月后缩小至（4.9±1.6）cm。15例患者中,4例患者发生了6个消融相关并发症;根据Dindo–Clavien分级,均属轻微并发症（I级）。 结论RFA联合TAE治疗巨大肝血管瘤是安全、有效的;TAE可有效阻断血管瘤血供,使瘤体缩小,降低后续RFA治疗的难度,减少消融相关并发症。     

Image-Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Central Renal Cell Carcinoma: Assessment of Clinical Efficacy and Safety in 31 Tumors

Purpose

To assess clinical efficacy and safety of image-guided percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation of central renal cell carcinoma with adjunctive pyeloperfusion.

A Comparison of Cryoablation with Heat-Based Thermal Ablation for Treatment of Clinical T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Study

PurposeTo compare the overall survival (OS) of patients receiving cryoablation versus heat-based thermal ablation for clinical T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in a large national cohort.Materials and MethodsPatients with RCC from 2004 to 2014 who were treated with ablation were identified from the National Cancer Database. OS was estimated with the use of the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated by means of log-rank test, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression, and propensity score–matched analysis.ResultsA total of 3,936 patients who received cryoablation and 2,322 who received heat-based thermal ablation met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 67 ± 12 year, and the mean size of tumors was 25 ± 8 mm. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were, respectively, 91%, 82%, and 62% for cryoablation and 89%, 81%, and 55% for heat-based thermal ablation. After propensity score matching, cryoablation was associated with longer OS compared with heat-based thermal ablation (median 11.3 vs 10.4 years; hazard ratio 1.175, 95% CI 1.03–1.341; P = .016). For patients with tumors ≤2 cm, propensity score–matched analyses demonstrated no significant difference between the 2 treatment groups (P = .772).ConclusionsOverall, cryoablation may be associated with longer OS compared with heat-based thermal ablation in cT1a RCC. No significant difference in survival rates was observed between the 2 treatments for patients with tumor sizes ≤2 cm. Owing to the inherent limitations of this study, further study with details on technology, local outcome, and complications is needed.     

Intermediate Outcomes and Predictors of Efficacy in the Radiofrequency Ablation of 100 Pathologically Proven Renal Cell Carcinomas

PurposeTo determine oncologic outcomes and predictors of primary efficacy, including RENAL nephrometry scores (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties, nearness of tumor to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, location relative to polar lines), after percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation of proven renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Materials and MethodsPatients who underwent percutaneous computed tomography– and ultrasound-guided RF ablation for histologically proven RCC from 2004 to 2011 were evaluated. Clinical data, pathologic findings, technical details, and outcomes were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of primary technique effectiveness and complications. Local tumor progression–free, metastasis-free, and overall survival were calculated. One hundred RCC lesions underwent 115 RF ablation sessions in 84 patients. Median follow-up was 24 months (mean, 27 mo; range, 1–106 mo).ResultsEfficacy of RF ablation was defined per International Working Group of Image-Guided Tumor Ablation criteria. Total, primary, and secondary technique effectiveness rates were 95% (95 of 100), 86% (86 of 100), and 9% (nine of 100), respectively. Primary efficacy was associated with size (P < .001), proximity to collecting system (P = .001), RENAL nephrometry score (P < .001), and number of ablation zones (P < .001). Complications occurred in 13% of patients, without procedure-related deaths. The median 2.1-year local progression–free, metastasis-free, disease-specific, and overall survival rates were 86%, 98.7%, 100%, and 97.6%, respectively.ConclusionsPercutaneous image-guided RF ablation for RCC provides excellent intermediate oncologic control. Location, size, proximity to the collecting system, low RENAL nephrometry score, and number of ablation zones predict primary efficacy.     

Percutaneous Cryoablation: Safety and Efficacy for Pain Palliation of Metastases to Pleura and Chest Wall

PurposeTo assess safety and efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation for pain palliation of metastases to pleura and chest wall.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective single-center cohort study included 22 patients (27% female, mean age 63 y ± 11.4) who underwent 25 cryoablation procedures for pain palliation of 39 symptomatic metastases measuring 5.1 cm ± 1.9 (range, 2.0–8.0 cm) in pleura and chest wall between June 2012 and December 2017. Pain intensity was assessed using a numerical scale (0–10 points). Statistical tests t test, χ², and Wilcoxon signed rank were performed.ResultsPatients were followed for a median of 4.1 months (interquartile range [IQR], 2.3–10.1; range, 0.1–36.7 mo) before death or loss to follow-up. Following cryoablation, pain intensity decreased significantly by a median of 4.5 points (IQR, 2.8–6; range, 0–10 points; P = .0002 points, Wilcoxon signed rank). Pain relief of at least 3 points was documented following 18 of 20 procedures. Pain relief occurred within a median of 1 day following cryoablation (IQR, 1–2; range, 1–4 d) and lasted for a median of 5 weeks (IQR, 3–17; range, 1–34 wk). Systemic opioid requirements decreased in 11 of 22 patients (50%) by an average of 56% ± 34. Difference in morphine milligram equivalents was not significant (P = .73, Wilcoxon signed rank). No procedure-related complications occurred despite previous radiation of 7 tumors. Of 25 procedures, 22 (88%) were performed on an outpatient basis.ConclusionsPercutaneous cryoablation for metastases to pleura and chest wall can safely provide significant pain relief within days following a single session.     

Partial Nephrectomy versus Percutaneous Cryoablation of Small Renal Cell Carcinomas: A Comparison of Adverse Events in a Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

PurposeTo assess and compare complications and readmissions after partial nephrectomy and percutaneous cryoablation of cT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Materials and MethodsPatients treated for cT1 RCC between 2019 and 2021 were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. Complications recorded within 30 and 90 days were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and percutaneous cryoablation was graded according to the Society of Interventional Radiology classification of adverse events. Major complications were defined as complications with a grade of ≥3 based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. Readmission within 30 days was recorded.ResultsThe cohort included 86 partial nephrectomies and 104 cryoablations. The complication rate within 90 days was 23% after partial nephrectomy and cryoablation (P = .98), with major complication rates of 3% after partial nephrectomy and 10% after cryoablation (P = .15). The readmission rates were 14% and 11% after partial nephrectomy and cryoablation, respectively (P = .48). Double-J stents were associated with overall complications (odds ratio [OR], 9.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.18–44.68; P = .003) and readmissions (OR, 5.39; 95% CI, 1.37–21.06; P = .015) after cryoablation. A high versus low radius-endophytic-nearness-anterior-location score (OR, 5.86; 95% CI, 1.08–31.81; P = .040) and endophytic location (OR, 7.70; 95% CI, 1.72–34.50; P = .008) were associated with a higher complication rate after cryoablation. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was associated with major complications after partial nephrectomy (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.05–4.30; P = .036).ConclusionsPartial nephrectomy and cryoablation are comparable regarding complications within 90 days after treatment. Tumor complexity and double-J stents were associated with complications after cryoablation, and a high CCI was associated with complications after partial nephrectomy.     

Evaluation of Outcomes following Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Parotid Tail Warthin Tumors

PurposeTo evaluate efficacy and safety of radiofrequency (RF) ablation for parotid Warthin tumor.Materials and MethodsFrom September 2016 to August 2017, 7 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven parotid Warthin tumors who did not undergo surgery presented with symptoms or cosmetic concerns and underwent US-guided percutaneous RF ablation treatment. RF ablation procedures were performed using the moving shot technique. US, contrast-enhanced CT, or MR imaging was performed 6–12 months after each procedure. Complications and cosmetic scale improvement after RF ablation were also evaluated.ResultsThere was a significant reduction in mean tumor volume from 14.6 cm³ ± 13.1 (range, 1.9–35.5 cm³) to 0.8 cm³ ± 0.5 (range, 0.2–1.54 cm³) and a mean cosmetic scale improvement (from 4 to 1) on imaging studies 6–12 months after RF ablation compared with before RF ablation (P < .05). Volume reduction ratios at 1–2 months, 5–6 months, and 10–12 months after RF ablation were 51.2% ± 18.1%, 87.8% ± 10.6%, and 94.3% ± 2.0%. There was no facial nerve injury. One patient with parotitis and hematoma recovered in 1 week.ConclusionsRF ablation using the moving shot technique could be an effective and safe alternative treatment for parotid tail Warthin tumors in patients unsuitable for or unwilling to undergo surgical resection.     

A Comparison of Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Renal Cryoablation Using Cryoprobes with and without Heat-Based Track Ablation

Purpose

To determine if the use of heat-based track ablation with new-generation cryoprobes is associated with decreased renal cryoablation bleeding complications.

Safety and Efficacy of Retrograde Pyeloperfusion for Ureteral Protection during Renal Tumor Cryoablation

PurposeTo determine safety and efficacy of retrograde pyeloperfusion for ureteral protection during cryoablation of adjacent renal tumors.Materials and MethodsRetrospective review of 155 patients treated with renal cryoablation, including adjunctive retrograde pyeloperfusion, from 2005 to 2019 was performed. Ice contacted the ureter in 67 of the 155 patients who represented the study cohort. Median patient age was 68 years old (interquartile range [61, 74]), 52 patients (78%) were male, and 37 tumors (55%) were clear cell histology. Mean tumor size was 3.4 ± 1.3 cm, and 42 tumors (63%) were located at the lower pole. Treatment-related complication and oncologic outcomes were recorded based on a review of post-procedural images and chart review.ResultsTechnical success of cryoablation was attained in 67 cases (100%), and technical success of pyeloperfusion was attained in 66 cases (99%). A total of 13 patients (19.4%) experienced SIR major C or D complications related to the procedure, including hemorrhage (n = 4), urine leak (n = 3), transient urinary obstruction (n = 2), pulmonary embolism (n = 1), hypertensive urgency (n = 1), acute respiratory failure (n = 1), and ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) stricture (n = 1). No complications were attributable to pyeloperfusion. Three of 45 patients with biopsy-proven renal cell carcinoma experienced local recurrence resulting in local recurrence-free survival of 92% (95% confidence interval, 81.5%–100%) 3 years after ablation.ConclusionsRetrograde pyeloperfusion of the renal collecting system is a relatively safe and efficacious option for ureteral protection during renal tumor cryoablation. This adjunctive procedure should be considered for patients in whom cryoablation of a renal mass could potentially involve the ureter.     

Cryoablation of Sternal Metastases for Pain Palliation and Local Tumor Control

PurposeTo determine safety and effectiveness of cryoablation of sternal metastases for pain palliation and local tumor control.Materials and MethodsA tumor ablation database was retrospectively reviewed for sternal cryoablation procedures performed between January 2005 and June 2013, which yielded 15 procedures to treat 12 sternal metastases in 12 patients (five men). Median patient age was 57 years (range, 38–80 y). Metastases arose from five primary sites (breast, lung, kidney, ampulla, and thyroid), and median tumor size was 3.8 cm (range, 2.2–7.5 cm). Seven patients (58%) underwent cryoablation for pain palliation, and five (42%) underwent cryoablation for local tumor control of oligometastatic disease. Clinical outcomes (including complications, local tumor control, and pain response) were evaluated retrospectively.ResultsMean pain scores decreased from 7.0 ± 1.9 (median, 7; range, 4–10) at baseline to 1.8 ± 1.2 (median, 1.5; range, 0–4) following cryoablation (P = .00049). Two patients had durable pain palliation, and four had greater than 1 month of pain relief, with a median duration of 5.7 months (range, 1.5–14.7 mo). Two patients in whom recurrent pain developed underwent repeat cryoablation, with durable pain relief. Allowing for a single repeat treatment, local tumor control was achieved in four of five patients (80%) treated for this indication, with median follow-up of 8.4 months (range, 2.6–13.6 mo). In one patient (8%), an infectious complication developed that was successfully treated with antibiotics on an outpatient basis.ConclusionsCryoablation is a safe and potentially effective treatment for patients with painful sternal metastases and can achieve local tumor control in select patients.     

Percutaneous treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: A comparison of the safety of cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation

Purpose

To compare the safety of image-guided percutaneous cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.

Materials and methods

This retrospective HIPAA-compliant study received institutional review board approval. Forty-two adult patients with cirrhosis underwent image-guided percutaneous ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma from 2003 to 2011. Twenty-five patients underwent 33 cryoablation procedures to treat 39 tumors, and 22 underwent 30 radiofrequency ablation procedures to treat 39 tumors. Five patients underwent both cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation procedures. Complication rates and severity per procedure were compared between the ablation groups. Potential confounding patient, procedure, and tumor-related variables were also compared. Statistical analyses included Kruskal–Wallis, Wilcoxon rank sum, and Fisher's exact tests. Two-sided P-values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

The overall complication rates, 13 (39.4%) of 33 cryoablation procedures versus eight (26.7%) of 30 radiofrequency ablation procedures and severe/fatal complication rates, two (6.1%) of 33 cryoablation procedures versus one (3.3%) of 30 radiofrequency ablation procedures, were not significantly different between the ablation groups (both P = 0.26). Severe complications included pneumothoraces requiring chest tube insertion during two cryoablation procedures. One death occurred within 90 days of a radiofrequency ablation procedure; all other complications were managed successfully.

Conclusion

No significant difference was seen in the overall safety of image-guided percutaneous cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.     

Intermediate to Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Cryoablation for Renal Masses

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse outcomes of percutaneous cryoablation (CA) for treatment of renal masses in a large cohort of patients.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective analysis included 299 CA procedures (297 masses in 277 patients) performed between July 2007 and May 2018 at a single institution. The mean patient age was 66.1 years (range, 30–93 years) with 65.8% being male. A total of 234 (78.8%) masses were biopsy-proven renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The mean maximal tumor diameter was 2.5 cm (range, 0.7–6.6 cm). Efficacy was assessed only for ablations of biopsy-proven RCC, whereas the evaluation of adverse events and renal function included all masses. Complications were graded according to the Society of International Radiology classification.ResultsMajor complications occurred in 3.0% of procedures (n = 9), none of which resulted in death or permanent disability. The mean imaging follow-up period was 27.4 months (range, 1–115) for the 199 RCC patients (204 ablated tumors) with follow-up imaging available. Complete response on initial follow-up imaging at mean 4.2 months (range, 0.3–75.6) was achieved in 195 of 204 tumors (95.6%) after a single session and in 200 of 204 tumors (98.0%) after 1 or 2 sessions. Of the RCC patients achieving complete response initially, local recurrence during the follow-up period occurred in 3 of 200 tumors (1.5%). Metastatic progression occurred in 10 of 193 (5.2%) RCC patients without prior metastatic disease during follow-up.ConclusionsCA for renal masses is safe and remains efficacious through intermediate- and long-term follow-up.