Association of family history of HBV with resectability of hepatocellular carcinoma

Background/Aims: This study aims to address the relationship between a positive family history of liver cancer or hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and the operative resectability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the Chinese population. Methodology: Two hundred and sixty-two HCC patients underwent operative or non-operative therapies in our hospital. One hundred and eighteen of the patients were clinically considered as resectable patients. The remaining 144 patients were clinically unresectable. Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS 15.0 for Windows. Results: A family history of HBV infection is significantly associated with the resectability of HCC (AOR=2.332; 95% CI, 1.051-5.177). There was also has a significant association between the first degree relatives infected with HBV and the resectability of HCC (AOR=2.334; 95% CI, 1.050-5.190), especially a patient's sibling having a history of HBV infection is significantly related to the resectability of HCC (AOR=2.727; 95% CI, 1.092-6.808). Conclusions: A family history of HBV infection is associated with the resectability of HCC, and in particular, if a patient's sibling has a history of HBV infection, this indicates a reduced opportunity to receive curative liver resection.     

Clinical features of HBsAg-negative but anti-HBc-positive hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatitis B virus endemic area

BACKGROUND: The presence of antibody to the hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) IgG in serum usually means a past infection of the hepatitis B virus (HBV). The clinical characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), who have only a marker for past HBV infection, were investigated. METHODS: A total of 565 HCC patients were classified according to their markers for HBV and the hepatitis C virus (HCV). The clinical features and the survival rate of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)(-)/anti-HBc(+) patients were compared to those of HBsAg(+) patients. RESULTS: Four hundred and three patients were positive for HBsAg (B group, 71.3%), 64 were positive for anti-HCV (11.3%), and 90 were negative for both HBsAg and anti-HCV (N group, 15.9%). In the N group, 71 were positive for anti-HBc (PB group, 12.6% of total patients). The clinical characteristics of the PB group were different from those of the B group: age at diagnosis (60.6 +/- 9.6 vs 53.3 +/- 10.6 years, P < 0.001), habitual drinking (59.2% vs 23.6%, P < 0.001), family history of liver disease (9.9% vs 38.9%, P < 0.005), detection with periodic screening (28.2% vs 50.4%, P < 0.001), and elevated alpha-fetoprotein (53.5% vs 76.2%, P < 0.001). In both the PB group and the B group, liver cirrhosis was accompanied by a similar high prevalence (74.6% vs 89.1%). However, there was no significant difference in the cumulative survival rate. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HBsAg(-)/anti-HBc(+) HCC is not rare or more common than that of anti-HCV(+) HCC in Korea, a high HBV endemic area. Although some differences in clinical characteristics may imply a different pathogenesis, chronic HBV infection or habitual drinking may be major contributing factors in the development of HCC in these patients.     

中国北方地区321例乙型肝炎病毒相关肝细胞癌患者的流行病学和临床特征分析

背景:我国是肝细胞癌(HCC)高发区,其中大部分HCC与乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染相关,有必要对其自然史和临床进程作大样本调查研究。目的:了解中国北方地区HBV相关HCC患者的流行病学和临床特征。方法:对中国北方地区321例HBV相关HCC患者作流行病学问卷调查,行肝功能、甲胎蛋白(AFP)、HBV血清标志物和HBV DNA水平检测,并进行统计分析。结果:321例HBV相关HCC患者中,仅7.2%接受过抗病毒治疗;46.4%和25.5%分别有肝硬化和肝癌家族史;38.3%有饮酒史。21.0%的患者乙型肝炎e抗原(HBeAg)阳性,62.3%乙型肝炎e抗体(HBeAb)阳性,HBeAg阳性者合并肝硬化的比例和HBV DNA水平较高。84.5%的患者HBV DNA阳性,但其中仅42.6%HBV DNA≥5.0log10,HBV DNA高水平者合并肝硬化的比例显著高于HBV DNA低水平者。无症状HBV感染、慢性乙型肝炎、代偿性和失代偿性肝硬化患者分别占4.1%、24.1%、39.0%和32.9%。71.0%的患者AFP升高,但其中仅33.8?P≥400ng/ml。结论:本组HBV相关HCC患者中,HBeAg阳性和高HBV DNA水平者不多,但病情常较重。肝硬化是HCC的重要危险因素,饮酒和肝癌家族史对HCC的发生有一定影响。血清AFP筛查有助于HCC的诊断。     

Clinical aspects and outcomes of volunteer blood donors testing positive for hepatitis‐C virus infection in Taiwan: a prospective study

Abstract: Background/Aim: The natural history of hepatitis‐C virus (HCV) infection has been explored in volunteer blood donors, but not yet in hepatitis‐B endemic areas. Whether previous or concurrent hepatitis‐B virus (HBV) infection influences the natural history of HCV infection remains unknown. Thus, we followed the anti‐HCV‐positive blood donors who had past or concurrent HBV infection in Taiwan. Methods: From 1992 to 1993, 1588 anti‐HCV reactive volunteer blood donors were referred to us from the Taipei Blood Center and 879 (55%) repeatedly reactive for anti‐HCV were enrolled. Two hundred and forty‐three donors (HCV RNA seropositive rate 49% by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)) received regular follow‐ups (mean period: 4.9 years) with their liver disease status determined mainly by clinical and biochemical parameters, serum alpha‐fetoprotein level and imaging studies. Hepatitis‐C virus genotype and occult HBV infection were determined by PCR‐based assays. Results: Of the initial 879 subjects, 250 (28%) had chronic hepatitis, nine (1%) had liver cirrhosis (LC) and two (0.2%) had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) already. In the 243 regularly followed donors, 30% had repeatedly normal serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and 70% had more than once elevated ALT. Cirrhosis developed in four (1.6%; follow‐up period range: 2–6 years) and HCC in two (0.8%; follow‐up period: 3 and 4 years, respectively). Distribution of HCV genotype and hepatitis‐B surface antigen (HBsAg) did not differ between those with and those without elevation of ALT. Of the 15 donors with LC and/or HCC, only 1(7%) was positive for both HBsAg and HBV DNA and the other 14 were negative for both HBsAg and serum HBV DNA. Conclusions: Incidentally detected hepatitis‐C was progressive in a small proportion of anti‐HCV‐positive volunteer blood donors in Taiwan. Occult HBV infection played a minimal role in the development of LC in this donor population.     

Profile of hepatocellular carcinoma in India: An insight into the possible etiologic associations

BACKGROUND: Several etiologic factors including hepatitis viruses, alcohol and aflatoxin have been implicated in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). There is, however, limited information from the Indian subcontinent. METHODS: Seventy-four consecutive cases of HCC were studied. A detailed history, tests for hepatitis B virus (HBV; HBsAg, HBeAg, anti-HBe, IgG anti-HBc, anti-HBs and HBV-DNA), hepatitis C virus (HCV; anti-HCV and HCV-RNA) infection, liver histopathology and HBV-DNA integration by using Southern blot hybridization were studied. A p53 gene mutation was also studied by using PCR and single-strand conformation polymorphism. RESULTS: Hepatocellular carcinoma patients were predominantly males (mean age 49.5 +/- 14.0 years). Portal hypertension and cirrhosis were seen in 56 (76%) patients, more often (P < 0.05) in viral marker positive cases. Forty-five percent of patients had features of hepatic decompensation at presentation. Evidence of HBV infection was present in 53 (71%) patients. Twenty-six (49%) of these patients had either HBeAg + ve, HBV-DNA + ve (n = 12), or HBsAg - ve, HBV-DNA + ve (n = 14) forms of HBV infection. Hepatitis B virus DNA integration in the liver tissue was seen in 10 of 17 (59%) patients. Infection with HCV alone was detected in three (4%) and dual HBV and HCV infection in six (8%) patients. A majority (78.5%) of the chronic alcoholics had associated viral infection. The etiology of HCC remained undetermined in 15 (20%) patients. The p53 gene mutations were detected only in three of 21 (14%) liver tissues. Aflatoxin toxicity, oral contraceptive use or metabolic disorder were not seen. CONCLUSIONS: In India: (i) HBV infection is the predominant factor for the development of HCC, often related to mutant forms of HBV; (ii) a majority of the HCC patients have overt cirrhosis of the liver; and (iii) HCV and alcohol per se are uncommonly associated.     

Occult hepatitis B virus infection as a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C in whom viral eradication fails.

Aim: Recent studies have suggested that an occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection negative for HBsAg but positive for HBV-DNA contributes to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Some follow-up studies have suggested the clinical importance of occult HBV infections in HCC development even after interferon (IFN) therapy, but a recent study denies the significance of the impact of occult HBV infection. Focusing on HCC development in patients in whom hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication by interferon (IFN) therapy had failed, we conducted this study in order to assess the impact of occult HBV infections on HCC development in these patients. Methods: We enrolled 141 patients with chronic hepatitis C (histological stage F2 or F3) who were seropositive for HCV-RNA even after IFN therapy. Serum HBV-DNA was assayed using the real-time polymerase chain reaction. During follow-up, ultrasonography and/or computed tomography (CT) were performed at least every 6 months to monitor HCC development. Results: The cumulative incidence rates of HCC were 8.9%, 25.7% and 53.7% at 5 years, 10 years and 15 years, respectively, after IFN therapy. Multivariate analysis indicated that low platelet counts (<12 x 10(4)/mm(3)), occult HBV infection, high ALT levels (>/=80 IU/L) after IFN therapy and the staging of liver fibrosis were important independent factors affecting the appearance of HCC. Conclusions: Occult HBV was a risk factor for HCC development in patients with chronic hepatitis C in whom HCV eradication had failed. Therefore, patients with chronic hepatitis C with occult HBV should be monitored carefully for HCC after IFN therapy.     

Pathobiology of chronic hepatitis virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Hepatitis viruses may cause liver cancer (HCC) through an indirect mechanism inducing inflammation and cirrhosis. Only hepatitis B virus (HBV) was shown to have a direct oncogenetic potential. Hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection, superimposed on the oncogenetic background provided by chronic HBV infection, appears to provide an additional risk for HCC. Patients with florid infections from both HBV and HDV and active liver inflammation develop HCC at a significantly younger age than those infected by HBV alone or infected by hepatitis C virus (about 10 years earlier). In patients positive for serum HBV-DNA/HDV-RNA and/or IgM anti-HBc/IgM anti-HD it is mandatory to program a more frequent (thrice a year) schedule of screenings (ultrasound scan, alpha-1-phetoprotein, etc.) for prophylaxis of HCC.     

HCV HBV感染与肝细胞性肝癌

调查了肝癌高发地区不同肝病患者中丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染率。慢性肝病患者绝大多数已被乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染。HCV第二代抗体阳性率,肝癌7.3％,肝硬化6.6％,慢性肝炎6.6％和急性肝炎3.4％。两种病毒的复合感染率,肝癌5.1％,肝硬化1.7％,慢性肝炎3.9％和急性肝炎1.1％。在38例HCV抗体阳性的慢性肝病患者中,ALT异常84.2％,有输血史者占57.9％,HCV-RNA阳性率为71.1％。本研究的资料分析提示,在肝癌高发地区尽管HCV抗体阳性率较低,但HCV感染也是肝癌发生的重要病因之一。     

Liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus: Decreasing indication and changing trends

AIM: To evaluate the indication and outcome of hepatitis B virus(HBV)-related liver transplantation(LT) in the era of newer antiviral agents.METHODS: We collected data on all patients who underwent transplantation at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center.These data included demographic,perioperative and long-term postoperative follow-up data including viral serological markers,HBV DNA,and repeated liver imaging.Between January 1990 and January 2012,133 patients(106 males and 27 females) underwent LT for HBV-related cirrhosis at our center.All patients were followed up frequently during the first year following transplantation,according to our standard protocol; follow-up visits occurred every 3-6 mo thereafter.Breakthrough infection was definedas re-emergence of HBV-DNA or hepatitis B surface antigen(HBs Ag) while on treatment.Five patients transplanted prior to 1992 did not receive immediate posttransplant anti-HBV prophylaxis; all other patients were treated with HBIG and at least one nucleos(t)ide analog.RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three patients underwent LT for HBV and were followed for a median of 82 mo(range: 1-274).The rates of post-LT survival and HBV recurrence during the follow-up period were 89% and 11%,respectively.The following factors were associated with disease recurrence: younger age(44.3 ± 16.2 years vs 51.4 ± 9.9 years,P = 0.02),positive pretransplant hepatitis B e antigen(HBe Ag)(60% vs 14%,P 0.0001),detectable pretransplant HBV DNA(60% vs 27%,P = 0.03),positive posttransplant HBs Ag(80% vs 4%,P 0.0001) and positive posttransplant HBe Ag(27% vs 1%,P 0.0001).Forty-four(33%) patients had hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).In the first(pre-2007) group,HBV was the second leading indication for LT after hepatitis C virus infection.A total of 64 transplants were performed,including 46(72%) for decompensated HBV cirrhosis,12(19%) for decompensated cirrhosis complicated by HCC and 6(10%) for compensated cirrhosis complicated by HCC.In the second group,nonalcoholic steatohepatitis surpassed HBV as the second leading indication for LT.A total of 69 HBV related transplants were performed,including 43(62%) for decompensated HBV cirrhosis,7(10%) for decompensated cirrhosis complicated by HCC and 19(27.5%) for compensated cirrhosis complicated by HCC.There was a significant(P = 0.007) increase in the number of transplants for compensated cirrhosis complicated by HCC.CONCLUSION: The use of potent anti-HBV agents has led to a changing trend in the indications for LT.HBV is currently the third leading indication for LT in this hyperendemic area.     

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection in Asian countries

Of the estimated 50 million new cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection diagnosed annually, 5-10% of adults and up to 90% of infants will become chronically infected, 75% of these in Asia where hepatitis B is the leading cause of chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In Indonesia, 4.6% of the population was positive for HBsAg in 1994 and of these, 21% were positive for HBeAg and 73% for anti-HBe; 44% and 45% of Indonesian patients with cirrhosis and HCC, respectively, were HBsAg positive. In the Philippines, there appear to be two types of age-specific HBsAg prevalence, suggesting different modes of transmission. In Thailand, 8-10% of males and 6-8% of females are HBsAg positive, with HBsAg also found in 30% of patients with cirrhosis and 50-75% of those with HCC. In Taiwan, 75-80% of patients with chronic liver disease are HBsAg positive, and HBsAg is found in 34% and 72% of patients with cirrhosis and HCC, respectively. In China, 73% of patients with chronic hepatitis and 78% and 71% of those with cirrhosis and HCC, respectively, are HBsAg positive. In Singapore, the prevalence of HBsAg has dropped since the introduction of HBV vaccination and the HBsAg seroprevalence of unvaccinated individuals over 5 years of age is 4.5%. In Malaysia, 5.24% of healthy volunteers, with a mean age of 34 years, were positive for HBsAg in 1997. In the highly endemic countries in Asia, the majority of infections are contracted postnatally or perinatally. Three phases of chronic HBV infection are recognized: phase 1 patients are HBeAg positive with high levels of virus in the serum and minimal hepatic inflammation; phase 2 patients have intermittent or continuous hepatitis of varying degrees of severity; phase 3 is the inactive phase during which viral concentrations are low and there is minimal inflammatory activity in the liver. In general, patients who clear HBeAg have a better prognosis than patients who remain HBeAg-positive for prolonged periods of time. The outcome after anti-HBe seroconversion depends on the degree of pre-existing liver damage and any subsequent HBV reactivation. Without pre-existing cirrhosis, there may be only slight fibrosis or mild chronic hepatitis, but with pre-existing cirrhosis, further complications may ensue. HBsAg-negative chronic hepatitis B is a phase of chronic HBV infection during which a mutation arises resulting in the inability of the virus to produce HBeAg. Such patients tend to have more severe liver disease and run a more rapidly progressive course. The annual probability of developing cirrhosis varies from 0.1 to 1.0% depending on the duration of HBV replication, the severity of disease and the presence of concomitant infections or drugs. The annual incidence of hepatic decompensation in HBV-related cirrhosis varies from 2 to 10% and in these patients the 5-year survival rate drops dramatically to 14-35%. The annual risk of developing HCC in patients with cirrhosis varies between 1 and 6%; the overall reported annual detection rate of HCC in surveillance studies, which included individuals with chronic hepatitis B and cirrhosis, is 0.8-4.1%. Chronic hepatitis B is not a static disease and the natural history of the disease is affected by both viral and host factors. The prognosis is poor with decompensated cirrhosis and effective treatment options are limited. Prevention of HBV infection thorough vaccination is still, therefore, the best strategy for decreasing the incidence of hepatitis B-associated cirrhosis and HCC.     

Characteristics and prognosis of patients in Japan with viral marker-negative hepatocellular carcinoma

Background and Aim: The characteristics and prognosis of patients with hepatitis virus marker‐negative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not fully elucidated in Japan. We investigated the characteristics and prognosis of HCC patients in whom no markers for hepatitis virus infection were detected, in comparison with those of HCC patients with hepatitis virus infection. Methods: Viral markers for hepatitis B and C virus (HBV and HCV) infection were measured in 1152 patients in whom initial HCC was diagnosed between 1991 and 2004. Patient characteristics, characteristics of HCC and survival were compared between patients in whom no marker was positive (viral marker‐negative HCC) and those in whom chronic HBV or HCV infection was confirmed by viral markers (viral HCC). Results: Overall, 119 patients (10.3%) were shown to have viral marker‐negative HCC. Hepatocellular carcinoma was detected under surveillance in a significantly smaller percentage of patients with viral marker‐negative HCC than of patients with viral HCC (P < 0.0001). The tumor was significantly larger (P < 0.0001) and vascular invasion was significantly more prevalent (P = 0.0003) in patients with viral marker‐negative HCC than in those with viral HCC. The survival rate of patients with viral marker‐negative HCC was significantly lower than that of patients with viral HCC (P = 0.0378). Conclusion: The patients with HCC in whom hepatitis viral infection had not been confirmed tended not to be under surveillance, resulting in the detection of HCC at more advanced stage and with a poorer prognosis. Efforts to identify patients without hepatitis virus infection who should be under surveillance for HCC will be necessary in the future.     

Possible contribution of prior hepatitis B virus infection to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of prior hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and its role in hepatocarcinogenesis are not clear. The aim of the present study is to clarify the importance of prior HBV infection in development of HCC. METHODS: Of 1288 consecutive HCC patients between January 1999 and October 2002, 1008 patients were enrolled. To determine the influence of prior HBV infection in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative HCC, the prevalence of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) was examined according to age, and the clinical features were compared between the anti-HBc positive and the negative groups. RESULTS: The proportion of HBsAg-negative HCC patients, HCC patients with antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV; C-HCC) and HCC patients negative for both HBsAg and anti-HCV (nBnC-HCC), increased with age. The anti-HBc-positive rates in C-HCC patients also increased with age. Those rates in nBnC-HCC patients were >50% in all age groups. Furthermore, it was found that the anti-HBc-positive rates of these patients were higher than those of corresponding control patients. Tumor size and a positive rate for vessel involvement both in C-HCC and nBnC-HCC patients were larger and higher, respectively, in anti-HBc-positive patients compared with anti-HBc-negative patients, although the difference in nBnC-HCC did not reach statistical significance because of the small numbers. These tumor characteristics were similar to those of B-HCC patients. CONCLUSION: A possible contribution of prior HBV infection to the development of HCC is indicated.     

Hepatitis B virus genotypes and hepatocellular carcinoma in Thailand

AIM: The role of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes on the clinical features and prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is currently unknown. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the distribution of HBV genotypes and their clinical relevance in Thai patients. METHODS: HBV genotypes were determined by PCR-RFLP in stored sera of 93 asymptomatic carriers, 103 patients with chronic hepatitis, 60 patients with cirrhosis and 76 patients with HCC. The clinical data were analyzed in relation to the HBV genotype. RESULTS: HBV genotypes C and B were predominant in Thailand, accounting for 73% and 21%, respectively. The distributions of genotypes B and C were similar in HCC patients compared to the other groups. Genotype C was significantly more common in HCC patients who were under 40 years old than genotype B (18% vs 0%, P= 0.03), but was significantly less common in patients older than 60 years (26% vs 56.5%, P= 0.01). The positive rate of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) in patients with genotype C was significantly higher than that in patients with genotype B (71.6% vs 44.4%, P= 0.03 in chronic hepatitis; 56.8% vs 11.1%, P= 0.01 in cirrhosis). There were no differences between HCC patients with genotypes B and C regarding tumor staging by CLIP criteria and the overall median survival. Multivariate analyses showed that HBV genotype was not an independent prognostic factor of survival in HCC patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with genotype C had a higher positive rate of HBeAg and exhibited earlier progression of cirrhosis and HCC than those with genotype B. However, there were no differences in the risk of developing HCC and its prognosis between patients with these genotypes.     

Analysis of serum α‐fetoprotein concentration in patients with viral hepatitis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate serum α‐fetoprotein (AFP) concentrations in patients with viral hepatitis. METHODS: Serum concentrations of total bilirubin (TB), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate amino­transferase (AST), albumin, globulin, AFP and viral markers were determined in 310 patients with pathologically proven viral hepatitis. The relation between the concentration of AFP and clinical manifestation, pathology, family history of liver malignant disease and virus type was studied. RESULTS: Serum AFP concentrations were elevated in 115 of the 310 patients (37.1%). According to the pathological diagnosis, the lowest positive rate of AFP was in acute hepatitis (11.7%), the highest was in chronic severe hepatitis (66.7%), the second highest in liver cirrhosis (57.5%), and chronic hepatitis was intermediate (34.2%). If the diagnosis was based on the clinical manifestation, the highest positive rate was found in chronic severe hepatitis, the lowest in chronic hepatitis, and acute hepatitis was intermediate. The positive rate of serum AFP by virus type was 35.5% for hepatitis B (HBV), superinfected with HAV or with HEV was 62.8%, and with HCV was 27.3%. Only one in six patients with HCV infection and none with simple HAV or HEV infection were positive for AFP. In patients with a family history of liver cancer, the positive rate of AFP was higher than in those without such a history (57.9%vs 38.2%; P = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that AFP positivity is not uncommon in patients with viral hepatitis and if the patient has an elevated concentration, it is highly likely to be HBV infection or HBV super­infected with HAV or HEV.     

Anticardiolipin antibodies in chronic hepatitis B and chronic hepatitis D infection,and hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Relationship with portal vein thrombosis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies (ACAs) in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, chronic hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection and HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to associate this with the incidence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in HCC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-five cirrhotic patients with HBV-related HCC, 28 naive patients with chronic HBV infection and 14 naive patients with chronic HDV infection were enrolled prospectively in the study. Thirty-two healthy blood donors were used as controls. The ACAs (immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M) were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay system. Statistical analysis used non-parametric methodology (chi-squared test, Student t-test and Fisher exact test, P value<0.05). RESULTS: Eleven of the 65 patients with HCC (16.9%) showed a positive ACA titre and 22 of the patients (34%) had PVT. Of these patients, eight (36%) had a positive ACA titre. In contrast, from the 43 patients without PVT, only three (11%) showed a positive titre. From the 28 HBV patients, six (21.5%) had a positive ACA titre, and six out of 14 (42.8%) HDV patients also showed a positive ACA titre. Three of the six ACA positive HBV patients presented an extrahepatic manifestation of the disease. One out of 32 control patients (3%) had positive ACAs. CONCLUSION: Both chronic HBV and chronic HDV infections are potent stimulants for the production of ACAs. The presence of ACAs in a great proportion of HBV-cirrhosis-related HCC patients with PVT suggests their possible participation in thrombotic mechanisms and in the hypercoagulable state that occurs in advanced liver disease and HCC.     

TT virus infection among Egyptian patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV) have been associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, a novel DNA virus was isolated from a patient with posttransfusion hepatitis of unknown etiology and designated TT virus (TTV). To examine whether this virus is associated with HCC, we investigated sera from 82 Egyptian patients with histopathologically-diagnosed HCC. All subjects underwent serological investigations for detection of hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg), hepatitis B core antibody (HbcAb) and anti-HCV. Detection of TTV-DNA was performed by semi-nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using TTV-specific primers. TTV-DNA was detected in 28% of the patients. Age, gender, risk factors and biochemical liver functions did not significantly differ between TTV-DNA positive and negative patients. TTV was detected in 27.1% of patients with HCV-HCC, 25% of HBV-HCC, 66.7% of dual HCV and HBV infection and 40% of those with non-B, non-C-HCC (NBNC-HCC). It is concluded that, in this the cohort of Egyptian patients with HCC, TTV infection is common and is not associated with HCV, HBV, NBNC-HCC, history of schistosomiasis or blood transfusion.     

Genotype C hepatitis B virus infection is associated with an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Identification of risk factors for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is important for HCC surveillance in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Our aim was to study the independent risk factors and effect of HBV genotypes on HCC development in a prospective longitudinal cohort of chronic hepatitis B patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chronic hepatitis B patients recruited since 1997 were prospectively followed up for the development of HCC. HCC was diagnosed by a combination of alpha fetoprotein, imaging, and histology. Liver cirrhosis was defined as ultrasonic features of cirrhosis together with hypersplenism, ascites, varices, and/or encephalopathy. RESULTS: In total, 426 patients were followed up for 1664 person years; median 225 (range 12-295) weeks. Forty nine (11%) patients had underlying clinical liver cirrhosis. A total of 242 (57%) and 179 (42%) patients had HBV genotypes C and B, respectively. Twenty five patients developed HCC in a median follow up of 121 (range 14-236) weeks. The overall incidence of HCC was 1502 cases per 100 000 person years. On multivariate analysis, clinical liver cirrhosis and HBV genotype C infection were independently associated with HCC development, with an adjusted relative risk of 10.24 (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.39-23.89; p<0.001) and 2.84 (95% CI 1.05-7.72; p = 0.040), respectively. Patient age, sex, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, and basal core promoter mutations did not predict HCC development. Patients infected with HBV genotype C tended to have persistently positive HBeAg or fluctuating HBeAg status and higher ALT levels during the follow up period. CONCLUSION: Genotype C HBV infection is an independent risk factor for HCC development in addition to liver cirrhosis.     

Vietnamese community screening for hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus

Summary. Asian Americans represent an important cohort at high risk for viral hepatitis. To determine the prevalence of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and HBV vaccination in a Vietnamese community, a total of 322 Vietnamese subjects from a local doctor’s office and annual Vietnamese Health Fair were included in this study. Demographic and clinical data were collected. 2.2% of the screened cohort tested positive for anti‐HCV and 9.3% tested positive for HBsAg. Unlike HBV‐positive subjects, HCV‐positive subjects had significantly higher liver enzymes (P = 0.0045 and P = 0.0332, respectively). The HBV‐positive group was more likely to report jaundice (P = 0.0138) and a family history of HBV (P = 0.0115) compared to HBV‐negative subjects. Forty‐eight patients (15.5%) reported a family history of liver disease (HBV, HCV, HCC, cirrhosis, other). Of this 48, 68.8% reported no personal history of HBV vaccination and 77.1% reported no family history of vaccination for HBV. Among the 183 subjects without a family history of liver disease, 156 (85.2%) reported no personal history of vaccination and 168 (91.8%) reported no family history of vaccination. HBV vaccination rates in those reporting a family history of liver disease were significantly higher (P = 0.020). There was a high prevalence of HBV infection in this community screening. Nevertheless, the rate for HBV vaccination was low. The low prevalence of abnormal liver enzymes in HBV‐positive subjects emphasizes the need for screening to be triggered by risk factors and not by abnormal liver enzymes.