AUStralian Study of Titration to Effect Profile of Safety (AUS-STEPS): High-Dose Gabapentin (Neurontin) in Partial Seizures

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and impact on quality of life of gabapentin (Neurontin; GBP) as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: AUS-STEPS was an open-label, multicenter, prospective study in patients experiencing partial seizures who were inadequately controlled with one to three concurrent antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). GBP treatment was titrated to a maximum of 4,800 mg/day, over a treatment period of 24 weeks, to achieve an efficacious and tolerable dosage. Efficacy was assessed by seizure-frequency data. Quality of life was evaluated by using the QOLIE-10 questionnaire, and safety was assessed by adverse-event reports and clinical laboratory findings. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients received treatment with GBP, with 174 evaluable for intention-to-treat (ITT) efficacy analysis. A reduction of >50% in overall seizure frequency was observed in 93 patients (53%). There was a small (4.6%) overall improvement in QOLIE-10 score. The most frequent adverse events were dizziness (31%), fatigue (29%), somnolence (27%), headache (21%), and ataxia (20%), with no major increase seen in adverse events necessitating discontinuation as the dose of GBP was titrated upward. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that patients with partial epilepsy may be effectively treated with GBP at dosages of < or =4,800 mg/day, without altering the safety profile of the drug.     

Sustained efficacy and long-term safety of oxcarbazepine: one-year open-label extension of a study in refractory partial epilepsy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oxcarbazepine (OXC) in medically refractory partial epilepsy. METHODS: This study is the open-label extension phase that followed a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, dose-response clinical study of OXC monotherapy in patients with medically refractory partial epilepsy. We analyzed the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of OXC during the first 48 weeks of open-label therapy. To evaluate efficacy, we compared the change in seizure frequency throughout the 48 weeks of treatment with OXC with the baseline seizure frequency that preceded the double-blind phase of the core study by an intent-to-treat and completer analysis. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by using an intent-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Of the 87 patients enrolled in the double-blind study, 76 patients participated in the open-label extension phase. Fifty-five (72%) patients completed 48 weeks of open-label treatment on a median OXC dose of 2,400 mg/day. Based on an intent-to-treat analysis, the median reduction in seizure frequency was 47%(p = 0.0054); the 50 and 75% responder rates were 46.1 and 25.0%, respectively, with 6.6% of patients remaining seizure free. The completer analysis yielded comparable efficacy results. OXC was well tolerated, with 13% of patients exiting because of adverse events. The six most common adverse events, irrespective of their causal relation to OXC, were dizziness, headache, fatigue, diplopia, nausea, and rash. For the most part, these adverse events tended to be transient. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of OXC is sustained with good safety and tolerability profiles during long-term treatment of patients with medically refractory partial epilepsy.     

Gabapentin add-on treatment: how many patients become seizure-free?: An open-label multicenter study

The aim of the study was to find out the percentage of patients with localization-related epilepsy achieving complete seizure control with gabapentin (GBP) add-on therapy. Patients under anti-epileptic drug monotherapy during 8 weeks baseline (BSL) with 6 or more seizures were treated with GBP for 26 weeks up to 2400 mg/day. Patients obtaining complete seizure control of all seizures or any partial seizure type during the last 8 weeks were calculated. Seizure frequency was compared between BSL and last 8 weeks. In all, 110 patients were enrolled (92 completed, 18 discontinued): mean age of the completers: 37.6 years (range 16–72), median seizure frequency per 28 days at BSL: 6.8 (2.5–24.5), mean duration of epilepsy: 17.6 years (0.2–51.4), mean duration with GBP for completers: 182.8 days (144–187). Complete seizure control of all seizures was achieved in 8.7% of patients (simple partial seizures: 13.3%, complex partial seizures 24.3%, secondarily generalized seizures: 61.5%): 38% of the patients became seizure-free in at least 1 seizure-type; 40% experienced adverse events. Assessment for quality of life (QoL) and trough plasma levels of GBP did not correlate with the good effect of GBP.     

Gabapentin versus lamotrigine monotherapy: a double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy

PURPOSE: This randomised, double-blind study compared the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) gabapentin (GBP) and lamotrigine (LTG) as monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy. METHODS: Patients with partial seizures with and/or without secondary generalization or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures were randomized to either GBP or LTG. During 2- and 6-week titration periods, respectively, GBP dosage reached 1,800 mg/day, and LTG, 150 mg/day. In the subsequent 24-week maintenance phase, the dose could be adjusted based on seizure control or adverse events between 1,200 and 3,600 mg/day for GBP and 100 and 300 mg/day for LTG. The primary end point was time to exit, a composite of efficacy and tolerability. Evaluable patients were used for the primary efficacy analysis, whereas tolerability was examined on an intent-to-treat basis. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients was randomized, and 291 (148 GBP, 143 LTG) were included in the evaluable population. Nineteen patients in each group had an exit event. The median time to exit was 69 days for GBP and 48 days for LTG. The hazard ratio was estimated as 1.043 (90% confidence intervals, 0.602-1.809). Overall, 106 (71.6% of the evaluable population) GBP-treated and 96 (67.1%) LTG-treated patients completed the study. Of those, 80 (75.5%) patients taking GBP and 73 (76.0%) taking LTG remained seizure free during the final 12 weeks of treatment. Only 14 (8.9%) GBP-treated patients and 15 (9.9%) LTG-treated patients withdrew because of study drug-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: GBP and LTG monotherapy were similarly effective and well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.     

Gabapentin in childhood epilepsy: a prospective evaluation of efficacy and safety

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin (GBP) in partial epilepsy in children. METHODS: We performed a prospective open label add-on study in 52 children and adolescents (age 1.8-17.5 years, mean 11.1 years) with refractory partial seizures. Gabapentin was added to one other baseline drug and the efficacy was rated according to seizure type and frequency. RESULTS: The GBP dose ranged from 26 to 78 mg/kg per day (mean 52 mg/kg per day) and was well tolerated in most patients. The seizure frequency remained unchanged in 34 patients (65%). We saw a provocation of seizures in three children (6%). Initially 15 patients (29%) benefited from GBP: five (10%) with a seizure reduction of 50-74%, seven (13%) with a reduction of 75-99% and three (6%) became seizure free. All but three experienced a development of tolerance within the next weeks to months. CONCLUSIONS: Although gabapentin seems also to be safe in children, the efficacy in refractory partial seizures was disappointing.     

Tiagabine Monotherapy in the Treatment of Partial Epilepsy

Summary: Three studies were conducted to assess tiagabine (TGB) hydrochloride monotherapy in patients with partial seizures. The first was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 11 patients (seven TGB, four placebo) undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery. Baseline antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy was discontinued abruptly before monotherapy. Although 24-h seizure rates increased during monotherapy in both groups, patients receiving TGB experienced fewer seizures than placebo patients. Subsequent studies (an open-label, dose-ranging study; n = 31 and a double-blind, randomized comparison of 6 and 36 mg/day TGB; n = 102 and 96, respectively) involved discontinuation of baseline AEDs. In the dose-ranging study, 19 of 31 patients (61%) converted to TGB monotherapy, with a mean final dose of 38.4 mg/day (range 24–54 mg/day) in those who completed the study ( n = 12). In the low- vs. high-dosage study, median 4-week complex partial seizure rates decreased significantly in patients from both dose groups who completed the monotherapy period ( p <0.05 compared with baseline). In the intent-to-treat analysis, significantly more patients in the high-dose group experienced a reduction in seizures of at least 50% compared with the low-dose group ( p = 0.038). Overall, the types of adverse events with TGB monotherapy were similar to those observed in add-on trials. These initial trials in difficult-to-treat epilepsy patients indicate that TGB monotherapy may provide a new approach to the treatment of patients with partial seizures refractory to other AEDs.     

Adjunctive therapy with oxcarbazepine in children with partial seizures. The Oxcarbazepine Pediatric Study Group

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of oxcarbazepine (OXC) as adjunctive therapy in children with inadequately controlled partial seizures on one or two concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). BACKGROUND: OXC has shown antiepileptic activity in several comparative monotherapy trials in newly diagnosed patients with epilepsy, and in a placebo-controlled monotherapy trial in hospitalized patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery. DESIGN: A total of 267 patients were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial consisting of three phases: 1) a 56-day baseline phase (patients maintained on their current AEDs); 2) a 112-day double-blind treatment phase (patients received either OXC 30-46 mg/kg/day orally or placebo); and 3) an open-label extension phase. Data are reported only from the double-blind treatment phase; the open-label extension phase is ongoing. METHODS: Children (3 to 17 years old) with inadequately controlled partial seizures (simple, complex, and partial seizures evolving to secondarily generalized seizures) were enrolled. RESULTS: Patients treated with OXC experienced a significantly greater median percent reduction from baseline in partial seizure frequency than patients treated with placebo (p = 0.0001; 35% versus 9%, respectively). Forty-one percent of patients treated with OXC experienced a > or =50% reduction from baseline in partial seizure frequency per 28 days compared with 22% of patients treated with placebo (p = 0.0005). Ninety-one percent of the group treated with OXC and 82% of the group treated with placebo reported > or =1 adverse event; vomiting, somnolence, dizziness, and nausea occurred more frequently (twofold or greater) in the group treated with OXC. CONCLUSION: OXC adjunctive therapy administered in a dose range of 6 to 51 mg/kg/day (median 31.4 mg/kg/day) is safe, effective, and well tolerated in children with partial seizures.     

Topiramate Monotherapy for Partial Onset Seizures

Summary: Purpose: Evaluation of topiramate (TPM) as monotherapy in patients with uncontrolled partial onset seizures.
Methods: A total of 48 patients were evaluated in a doubleblind, parallel-group trial. During a 56-day baseline period, patients had at least eight partial onset seizures while being treated with one or two standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). After 1–2 weeks of open-label treatment with TPM 100 mg/day, patients were randomly assigned, in equal proportions, to receive double-blind therapy with TPM 100 or 1,000 mg/day in a 5-week conversion and an 11-week monotherapy period. The study endpoint was completion of 112 study days (success) or fulfillment of one or more exit criteria: doubling of average 28- day or highest 2-day baseline seizure rate, a generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS) if none had occurred at baseline, or significant prolongation of generalized seizure duration.
Results: Time until exit was longer (p = 0.002) and success frequency was higher (p = 0.005) with TPM 1,000 as compared with 100 mg/day. Seizure-rate reductions of 50, 75, or 100% were achieved by 46, 25, and 13% of the 1,000-mg/day group, respectively, as compared with 13, 8, and 0% of the 100-mg/day group, respectively. Most adverse events (AE) were mild or moderate in severity.
Conclusions: Monotherapy with TPM 1,000 mg/day for partial onset seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures was effective, with a favorable safety profile.     

Long-term treatment with gabapentin for partial epilepsy.

Gabapentin was studied as an open-label 'add-on' antiepileptic drug in 35 patients with partial seizures. Follow-up at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months is reported. There was a trend toward improvement in simple (SPS) and complex partial seizures with it reaching significance for SPS at 12 and 24 months and for the weighted combination of seizures at 3 months. Five of nine patients were subsequently successfully converted to gabapentin monotherapy. Of those five, one is now seizure free and three are significantly improved since baseline. One remains with unchanged seizure frequency compared to baseline, but is experiencing less toxicity than at that time. This long-term observation suggests that the short-term effect demonstrated in blinded studies continues and that indeed some patients with refractory epilepsy can be maintained on gabapentin alone. Based on these findings, double-blind monotherapy trials of this drug are presently being conducted.     

Oxcarbazepine monotherapy for partial-onset seizures: a multicenter, double-blind, clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of oxcarbazepine (OXC) 2,400 mg/day versus OXC 300 mg/day monotherapy in patients with medically refractory partial epilepsy. BACKGROUND: OXC is primarily metabolized by reductase enzymes and, consequently, has a low propensity to inhibit or induce oxidative enzymes and a minimal potential for drug-drug interactions. The efficacy of OXC as monotherapy was shown in several comparative trials in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy and in hospitalized patients undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery. METHODS: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trial design was chosen to assess the antiepileptic efficacy of OXC as monotherapy in a refractory epilepsy patient population. Outpatients aged 12 years or older with inadequately controlled partial seizures, with or without secondarily generalized seizures, were enrolled. Patients finished the trial by completing the double-blind phase or by meeting one of four predefined exit criteria: a twofold increase in partial seizure frequency in any 28-day period relative to baseline; a twofold increase in the highest consecutive 2-day partial seizure frequency relative to baseline; occurrence of a single generalized seizure if none occurred during the 6 months prior to randomization; or prolongation or worsening of generalized seizure duration or frequency requiring intervention. Adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and clinical laboratory tests were evaluated. RESULTS: The percentage of patients meeting one of the exit criteria was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) for the OXC 2400 mg/day group (14/34; 41%) than the OXC 300 mg/day group (42/45; 93%). In addition, there was a significant difference in time to exit in favor of the OXC 2400 mg/day group (p = 0.0001). In the intent-to-treat analysis, 12% of patients in the OXC 2400 mg/day group were seizure-free compared with none in the 300 mg/day group. OXC was well-tolerated, with dizziness, fatigue, somnolence, and nausea being the most frequent AEs. Most of these AEs were transient and rated as mild to moderate in intensity. CONCLUSION: OXC is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with partial epilepsy previously receiving treatment with other antiepileptic drugs. The results of this trial are consistent with previous monotherapy trials with OXC.     

Epilepsy outcomes in elderly treated with topiramate

Objectives –  To explore effectiveness, tolerability and quality of life in elderly patients with epilepsy treated with topiramate.
Methods –  One year, open-label, flexible-dosing clinical trial.
Results –  One hundred and seven patients (mean age 69 years, 53% men) were studied during 273 ± 141 days. The average final dose in monotherapy was 98 mg/day vs 153 mg/day in adjunctive treatment. Mean monthly cumulative seizure frequency decreased from 3.7 ± 15 to 1.6 ± 7.7 ( n  = 101, P  < 0.0001), 78% of patients with seizures at baseline ( n  = 102) achieved at least 50% reduction in seizure frequency, 44% were seizure-free throughout the trial. Total scores on the quality of life in epilepsy inventory (QOLIE-31) improved from 57 ± 17 to 68 ± 18 ( n  = 64, P  < 0.0001). The most frequently reported adverse events included convulsions, dizziness and tiredness.
Conclusions –  Elderly patients treated with topiramate showed marked reductions in seizures, good tolerability and significant improvements in several aspects of quality of life.     

Safety and Tolerability of Gabapentin as Adjunctive Therapy in a Large, Multicenter Study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the tolerability and safety of gabapentin (GBP) as add-on therapy for seizure control. METHODS: Conducted in an outpatient setting and reflecting usual practice, this study compared tolerability of GBP dosages < or = 1,800 versus >1,800 mg/day, when these doses were required to achieve the most effective seizure control. Two analyses of adverse events are presented: tolerability and safety. In the tolerability analysis, each patient served as his or her own control to compare the occurrence of adverse events at GBP < or =1,800 versus >1,800 mg/day. The safety analysis required patients to receive at least one dose of GBP and have a follow-up contact. RESULTS: A total of 2,216 patients enrolled in this open-label, 16-week study and were evaluable for safety. Of these, 74.0% completed the 16-week study, and 281 met the tolerability criteria. Within these 281 patients, two mutually exclusive groups were compared (a) those reporting adverse events at only < or =1,800 mg/day (low dose); and (b) those reporting adverse events at only >1,800 mg/day (high dose). Three adverse events (asthenia, headache, and dizziness) were observed in a statistically significantly larger number of patients at only the low dose than in the group reporting these same adverse events at only the high dose, suggesting that patients who tolerated GBP at < or = 1,800 mg/day did not experience a significant increase in adverse events with dosages >1,800 mg/day. Overall, 10.6% of the 2,216 patients in the safety population prematurely withdrew because of adverse events, and 3.5% discontinued because of lack of efficacy. Safety and tolerability of GBP was rated as excellent or good for 78.5% of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin doses >1,800 mg/day were as well tolerated as doses < or =1,800 mg/day and were not associated with more adverse events.     

Tiagabine (Gabitril) Experience in Children

Summary: Tiagabine (TGB) is indicated as adjunctive therapy for partial seizures in adults and children aged 12 years and older. Double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of TGB treatment are under way in younger children with various forms of epilepsy. The results of pediatric pharmacokinetic trials indicate patterns similar to those seen in adults. An open-label study was conducted in the United States in 31 children with refractory complex partial seizures, with doses escalated every 2 weeks by 0.25 mg/kg up to a maximal daily dose of 1 mg/kg. Twenty-nine patients were treated with TGB for >1 year; 26 completed the study, of whom 18 were receiving monotherapy at study completion. A European dose-escalation study evaluated TGB (0.25–1.5 mg/kg/day) as add-on therapy in 52 children aged 2–15 years. TGB appeared to be more effective in localization-related epilepsy syndromes, with 17 of 23 patients with localization-related epilepsy having a 33% median reduction of seizure rate compared with baseline in the fourth month of treatment, and six patients having ≥50% seizure rate reduction. In this study, myoclonic seizures and spasms showed a poor response as opposed to encouraging findings reported by other groups with these seizure types. The adverse effect profile of TGB in children with epilepsy is similar to that in adults. In the U.S. study, most common adverse events were related to the central nervous system (CNS) and decreased over time. In the European study, mostly mild to moderate adverse events, including asthenia (19%), nervousness (19%), dizziness (17%), and somnolence (17%), were reported by 83% of TGB-treated children (39% of children reported adverse events during the single-blind placebo period). In summary, preliminary pediatric data with TGB suggest particular efficacy against epilepsy characterized by partial seizures or other syndromes, and further investigation is warranted.     

Long-term effects of tiagabine monotherapy on cognition and mood in adult patients with chronic partial epilepsy

The long-term effects of tiagabine monotherapy on cognition and mood were evaluated in adult patients with chronic partial epilepsy in a 48-week, open-label extension period that followed an 8-week, double-blind, titration study. Cognitive function was evaluated using neuropsychological evaluations that measured learning and memory, general intellectual ability, attention and mental speed, and reaction speed. Mood was assessed using a Finnish modification of the Profile of Mood States. Of the 34 patients who entered the open-label extension period, 18 successfully continued long-term monotherapy and underwent neuropsychological evaluation at 48 weeks of tiagabine monotherapy. The mean daily dose of tiagabine monotherapy at the end of open-label treatment was 19.7 mg/day (range, 5-35 mg/day). Tiagabine monotherapy did not adversely affect cognitive function. No significant changes in mood were observed. The median number of seizures was 2 (range, 0-71), and 8 patients (44%) were seizure-free during the 48 weeks of open-label tiagabine treatment. The results of this small open-label extension study indicate that patients with chronic partial epilepsy who were successfully converted to long-term tiagabine monotherapy demonstrated no adverse effects on cognitive function or mood.     

Efficacy of gabapentin as adjunctive therapy in a large, multicenter study. The Steps Study Group.

The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of gabapentin as adjunctive therapy in doses required to achieve the most effective seizure control. There were 2016 patients with partial seizures requiring adjunctive therapy who received gabapentin at doses up to 3600 mg/day in this open-label, multicenter, 16-week study. Of the 1055 patients evaluable for efficacy, 573 received gabapentin < or =1800 mg/day and 482 received > 1800 mg/day as the highest dose received. For the overall efficacy evaluable population, the percentage of patients achieving at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency was 76.0%; 46.4% of the patients were seizure free. Patients whose highest gabapentin dose did not require > 1800 mg/day had, at baseline, fewer seizures and were receiving fewer concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) at baseline than those patients requiring > 1800 mg/day. This suggests that patients requiring higher doses of gabapentin were more refractory to drug treatment at the start of the study. Gabapentin was well tolerated at all doses in this study. The results of the study demonstrate that gabapentin is effective as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures whose seizures are inadequately controlled by traditional AEDs.     

Treatment of partial seizures with gabapentin: double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study

This double-blind study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin 1200 mg/day and 1800 mg/day (t.i.d.) compared to placebo as an adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory epilepsy. Patients were included when they had partial seizures at least eight times during a 12-week baseline period despite treatment with one to two antiepileptic drugs. After baseline, eligible patients were randomized to gabapentin 1200 mg/day, 1800 mg/day, or placebo for 12-week treatment. The primary end-point, response ratio, was derived from seizure frequencies during treatment and baseline period based upon the seizure daily record by a patient. Of the 209 randomized patients, 86 received gabapentin 1200 mg/day, 41 received gabapentin 1800 mg/day, and 82 received placebo. A statistically significant difference was found between each of the two gabapentin groups and placebo for the primary efficacy end-point, response ratio (P < 0.005) with definite dose-response (P < 0.001). More gabapentin patients reported moderate to marked improvement in seizure frequency and intensity/duration of each seizure than placebo patients. Treatment-related adverse events were reported by approximately 65% of patients receiving gabapentin compared to approximately 46% of patients receiving placebo; somnolence and dizziness were the most common events. Gabapentin 1200 mg/day and 1800 mg/day significantly reduced the frequency of refractory seizures compared to placebo. Favorable tolerability of gabapentin was confirmed also in a Japanese population, consistent with previous global studies.     

Levetiracetam in patients with refractory epilepsy: results of the SKATE trial in Austria, Germany and Switzerland.

PURPOSE: To further evaluate the safety, efficacy and optimal dose of levetiracetam (LEV) in daily clinical practice among patients with uncontrolled partial epilepsy with or without secondary generalization. METHODS: In this phase IV, open-label, 16-week community-based study, 178 at least 16-year-old patients with refractory focal epilepsy were treated with 1000, 2000 or 3000 mg levetiracetam as adjunctive therapy. All patients started with 500 mg LEV b.i.d. (1000 mg/day); the dose was adjusted in 2-week intervals up to 1500 b.i.d. (3000 mg/day) depending on seizure control and tolerability. The main objectives were the adverse events, the percentage reduction in partial and total seizure frequency per week from baseline and the retention rate, defined as the percentage of patients taking LEV at the end of the 16-week treatment period. RESULTS: Of the 178 patients who took at least one dose of LEV 151 completed the study. Thus, the retention rate (number of patients taking LEV at the end of the 16-week treatment period) was 84.8%. Most frequently reported adverse events were asthenia, dizziness, headache, nausea, somnolence and hostility; the majority of these events were of mild to moderate intensity. The seizure-free rate of the ITT population with focal seizures was 16.7%, for all seizures 16.6%; the median reduction of focal seizure frequency was 47.6%, and 46.5% for all seizures. The 50% responder rate was 46.6% for focal seizures and 45.1% for all seizures. CONCLUSION: Add-on treatment with LEV in patients with refractory partial epilepsy was safe and effective in this study.     

Long-term safety and efficacy of gabapentin (neurontin) as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures

In an international, multicenter, open-label study, the long-term efficacy and safety of gabapentin (GBP, Neurontin) as add-on therapy were investigated in 203 patients with partial seizures refractory to standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). All patients enrolled in this study had experienced improved seizure control with GBP in one of four previous, short-term studies. Patients received mean GBP dosages of 1,283 to 2,220 mg/day for periods of ⩽1,894 days (mean, 385 days). For purposes of efficacy analyses, data were divided into 12-week treatment periods. During long-term treatment, the efficacy of GBP was shown to be maintained by several primary efficacy measures. In all of the 12-week treatment periods, the percentage of change in seizure frequency from baseline was equal to or less than −24%, responder rate was >35%, and response ratio ranged between −0.2 and −0.338. Results for secondary efficacy measures also indicated that efficacy was maintained. The favorable safety profile of GBP also was maintained during long-term treatment. Our results suggest that GBP is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated add-on treatment for long-term use in patients with partial seizures refractory to standard AEDs.     

Oral Gabapentin Disposition in Patients with Epilepsy After a High-Protein Meal

Summary: Purpose: To study the interaction between gaba-pentin (GBP) and high-protein meals, 12 patients with epilepsy were administered this drug both while in a fasting state and after a high-protein meal.
Methods : After having acquired their informed consent, the patients (suffering from partial complex seizures resistant to other anticonvulsants) were randomly assigned to 2 groups of 6 subjects. Each subject was treated in a fasting state with a single 400 (group A) or 800 (group B) mg GBP oral dose. After 24 h, the GBP dose regimen was repeated, but was given after a high-protein meal. Serum GBP concentrations were measured by LC-Mass at baseline and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, and 24 h. Saliva GBP concentrations were determined at baseline and 2, 4, 8, and 12 h. GBP urinary excretion was determined at 0–4, 4–8, and 8–12 h intervals. The following kinetic parameters were calculated: area under the concentration time curve from zero time to 24 h after the dose, AUC 0–24 h; maximal serum concentration, C_max; time to the maximal serum concentration, T_max; absorption rate constant, ka; elimination rate constant, p; elimination half-time, t½β. Student's t test for paired data, with significance assigned at P < 0.05, was used.
Results : No statistically significant differences were seen in GBP serum or saliva concentrations or in its urinary excretion (both in A or B group) between fasting and after the high-protein meal.
Conclusions : High-protein meals do not seem to interfere with oral disposition of GBP.     

Lamotrigine–valproic acid combination therapy for medically refractory epilepsy

Purpose:   A retrospective study of lamotrigine (LTG)–valproic acid (VPA) combination therapy in medically refractory epilepsy.
Methods:   Patients were identified with an adult epilepsy clinic database and were included if they had been on LTG–VPA combination therapy for at least 6 months. Patient demographics and information about epilepsy type, severity, and degree of medical intractability were obtained by retrospective chart review. The primary outcome measure was change in baseline seizure frequency, and patients were stratified into three groups: (i) seizure-free, (ii) improved (at least 50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency), and (iii) not improved.
Results:   Thirty-five patients met all inclusion–exclusion criteria. Epilepsy type was generalized in 25 patients (71%) and partial in 10 patients (29%). Before LTG–VPA treatment, 27 of 35 (77%) experienced disabling seizures on a monthly basis, and 17 of 35 (49%) of patients had at least one disabling seizure per week. Patients had previously failed treatment with a median of five antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), alone or in combination. With LTG–VPA therapy, 18 (51.4%) remained completely seizure-free, four (11.4%) were improved, and 13 (37.1%) were unimproved. Median follow-up was 42 months. Of the 22 patients who improved, 11 had previously failed LTG and VPA monotherapy. There was no significant difference between improved and unimproved patients with respect to demographics, epilepsy type or severity, or number of previously failed AEDs.
Discussion:   The combination of LTG and VPA should be considered in patients with medically refractory epilepsy. The effectiveness of this combination appears to be independent of epilepsy type or patient demographics.