The University of Missouri Rural Obstetric Network: creating rural obstetric training sites for a university-based residency program

This paper describes a rural obstetric experience that was developed for a university-based family practice residency program and designed to increase the number of deliveries per resident, the number of graduates practicing in rural areas, and the number of graduates doing obstetrics. Rural hospitals can be a source of deliveries for residency training programs. This rural obstetric experience also offers more training months in a rural setting and more months training with family physicians.     

Family Medicine Spokane Rural Training Track: 24 years of rural-based graduate medical education

Twenty percent of the US population lives in rural communities, but only about 9% of the nation's physicians practice in those communities. There is little doubt that the more highly specialized physicians are, the less likely they are to practice or settle in rural areas. There is clearly a population threshold below which it is not feasible for specialist (in contrast to generalist) physicians to pursue the specialty in which they have trained. Much of rural America falls below that threshold. This leaves large geographic areas of America to the primary care physician. The proportional supply of family physicians to specialists increases as urbanization decreases. Family physicians are the largest single source of physicians in rural areas. Family medicine residency programs based in rural locations provide a critical mechanism for addressing rural primary care needs. Graduates from rural residency programs are three times more likely to practice in rural areas than urban residency program graduates. There are two primary goals of training residents in rural areas: producing more physicians who will practice in rural areas and producing physicians who are better prepared for the personal and professional demands of rural practice. Rural Training Tracks, where the first year of residency is completed in an urban setting and the second and third years at a rural site (1-2 model), initially proposed by Family Medicine Spokane in 1985, have been highly successful in placing and maintaining more than 70% of their graduates in rural communities. Similar and modifications of the "Spokane RTT model" have been established around the country. Now, more than 24 years of educational experience has been accumulated and can be applied to further development of these successful family medicine residency programs.     

Factors influencing changes in obstetric care provided by family physicians: a national study

In an effort to determine the factors underlying changes in obstetric practice by family physicians, a random sample of 505 residency-trained family physicians was surveyed by mailed questionnaire. Of the 329 who responded, 65% had at some time practiced obstetrics, but only 45% were practicing obstetrics at the time of the survey. Rising malpractice insurance premiums and fear of lawsuit were factors most likely to influence a family physician's decision to cease obstetric practice. Lifestyle concerns and the number of obstetricians practicing in the area were also important factors for all family physicians. Important differences were found between family physicians who never delivered babies and those who had at some time practiced obstetrics. Family physicians who have given up obstetric practice were found to feel well trained and competent in this practice. Since changes in obstetric practice patterns have had an adverse effect on the obstetric care of women in rural areas and for the medically indigent, these findings have important public health implications.     

A Strategy to Increase the Number of Urban Family Practice Resident Physicians Who Enter Rural Practice

Physician geographic maldistribution is a problem in the United States health care system. Innovative strategies are needed to entice resident family physicians training in the larger, more numerous suburban and urban training programs to practice in rural areas upon completing their training. This paper describes a strategy used at St. Elizabeth Medical Center Family Practice Residency Program, Dayton, OH, to encourage rural practice. In the St. Elizabeth plan, the interested family practice resident moonlights in a rural practice provided by the local county hospital. The county medical staff covers the resident physician's practice during the frequent absences. The residency program faculty provide on-site supervision, telephone back-up coverage, and practice consultation. The county hospital provides billing services; the resident physician retains 100 percent of collections. The resident physician gains exposure to the knowledge, skills, and attitudes needed in rural practice. Upon completion of residency training, the physician remains in practice and is not required to pay back any expenses incurred by the hospital. Two resident physicians participate currently; three others have expressed interest in practicing in the community. A similar plan might work in parts of the United States where, like Ohio, training programs and rural communities are not far apart.     

Restructuring a family practice obstetrics curriculum

Maintaining a high-quality curriculum for family practice residency training in obstetrics has become increasingly difficult. In 1984 the faculty of the University of Vermont Department of Family Practice needed to upgrade its obstetric curriculum in a community where family practice obstetrics was nonexistent. The key steps to a new curriculum included the recruitment of family practice faculty with experience in obstetrics, expanded communication with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the development of baseline attending privileges in family practice obstetrics, the formation of educational tracks for residents, and the promotion of chart audits. Also important were faculty role modeling, intradepartmental meetings, intensive elective rotations, and community education. This case report of program development in family practice obstetrics may serve as a model to help other residency programs.     

Family practice obstetrics in Michigan. Factors affecting physician participation

The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics of family physicians in Michigan who practice obstetrics and to identify important factors relating to a decision to discontinue obstetric practice. Questionnaires were mailed to all members of the Michigan Academy of Family Physicians (MAFP) who were listed as currently practicing obstetrics. Two hundred ninety-one questionnaires from the 357 mailed questionnaires were returned for a response rate of 81.5 percent. Two hundred thirty-five of the 291 respondents (80.8 percent) were practicing obstetrics in 1986. Twenty-two of the 235 physicians (9.4 percent) planned on discontinuing obstetric practice by early 1987. Reasons for discontinuing obstetrics included malpractice liability risk and cost and interference with lifestyle. Physicians who had recently discontinued or were planning to discontinue obstetric practice were significantly less likely than physicians practicing obstetrics to have a residency program affiliation (33 percent vs 58 percent). While malpractice concerns were found to be an important factor in deciding to discontinue the practice of obstetrics, practice arrangements and educational affiliations were other important factors that may be more amenable to change through educational or administrative interventions.     

Can physicians be induced to resume obstetric practice?

BACKGROUND: Decreased numbers of obstetric providers during the last decade have limited access to obstetrics care, especially for some groups of women. Increasing or stabilizing the number of providers could increase access. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed in 1989 to 1965 Washington State family physicians and obstetricians to determine their attitudes toward the practice of obstetrics. Sixty-six percent of physicians responded to the survey. RESULTS: Of those who had quit obstetrics in the previous 3 years, 42 percent of responding family physicians and 19 percent of responding obstetricians would consider resuming. Those family physicians willing to consider resuming their obstetric practices were more likely to have been in practice fewer years, employed by a health maintenance organization (HMO), or located in a rural area. A majority of all respondents cited excessive malpractice premiums and fear of malpractice suit as reasons for stopping obstetric practice. Family physicians willing to consider resuming obstetrics were more concerned about the overall number of obstetric providers in their area. Rural family physicians willing to consider resuming obstetrics listed poor backup or shared call more often as a reason they had quit. CONCLUSIONS: Attention targeted to the concerns of family physicians who have been in practice for a short time, who work for HMOs, or who are in rural practice might help induce some physicians to resume obstetrics.     

Two Decades of Experience in the University of Washington Family Medicine Residency Network: Practice Differences Between Graduates in Rural and Urban Locations

This study describes how graduates of the University of Washington Family Medicine Residency Network who practice in rural locations differ from their urban counterparts in demographic characteristics, practice organization, practice content and scope of services, and satisfaction. Five hundred and three civilian medical graduates who completed their residencies between 1973 and 1990 responded to a 27-item questionnaire sent in 1992 (84% response rate). Graduates practicing outside the United States in a specialty other than family medicine or for fewer than 20 hours per week in direct patient care were excluded from the main study, leaving 116 rural and 278 urban graduates in the study. Thirty percent of graduates reported practicing in rural counties at the time of the survey. Rural graduates were more likely to be in private and solo practices than urban graduates. Rural graduates spent more time in patient care and on call, performed a broader range of procedures, and were more likely to practice obstetrics than urban graduates. Fewer graduates in rural practice were women. A greater proportion of rural graduates had been defendants in medical malpractice suits. The more independent and isolated private and solo practice settings of rural graduates require more practice management skills and support. Rural graduates' broader scope of practice requires training in a full range of procedures and inpatient care, as well as ambulatory care. Rural communities and hospitals also need to develop more flexible practice opportunities, including salaried and part-time positions, to facilitate recruitment and retention of physicians, especially women.     

Geriatric medicine training for family practice residents in the 21st century: a report from the Residency Assistance Program/Harfford Geriatrics Initiative

Increasing the quality and quantity of geriatric medicine training for family practice residents is a particular challenge for community-based programs. With support from the John A. Hartford Foundation of New York City, the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) implemented in 1995 a multi-part project to improve the amount and quality of geriatric medicine education received by family practice residents. This report summarizes the initial results of the regional geriatric medicine curriculum retreats for residency directors. The goals of the retreats were to build recognition among the residency directors of the skills that future family physicians will require to be successful providers of primary care to older adults and to allow the residency directors to identify and develop solutions to barriers to improving geriatric medicine training for residents. Forty-six program directors participated in the three retreats between February 2000 and February 2001. The participants represented 52 programs and rural tracks in all geographic regions, small and large programs, and urban and rural settings. The program directors developed a consensus on the geriatric medicine knowledge, skills, and attitudes that should be expected of all family practice residency graduates; developed a list of basic, required educational resources for each family practice residency program; and proposed solutions to common obstacles to successful curriculum development.     

Hospital privileges for family physicians. Patterns of recent residency graduates, residency director perceptions, and resident expectations

A national mail survey was performed that examined reports of recent residency graduates about hospital privileges for family physicians, perceptions of residency program directors about the percentage of their graduates who obtain privileges, and plans of third-year residents for seeking privileges. Privileges in medicine, pediatrics, surgery, obstetrics, and coronary care/intensive care units (CCU/ICU) were examined. Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of 308 residency graduates aged 30 to 35 years, all 383 family practice residency directors, and a random sample of 319 third-year residents. Two mailings produced an 82 percent response rate. Most recent graduates had privileges in medicine (97 percent), pediatrics (95 percent), and CCU/ICU (87 percent). A majority (64 percent) had obstetric privileges, and a minority (36 percent) had surgical privileges. Directors were accurate in their perceptions of privileges attained by graduates in medicine, pediatrics, and CCU/ICU, but underestimated the percentage who had privileges in surgery and overestimated the percentage who had privileges in obstetrics. Residents planned on seeking privileges in medicine, pediatrics, and obstetrics at a rate similar to recent graduates, with lower percentages planning on seeking them in surgery and CCU/ICU. Privileges in surgery and obstetrics were more prevalent in the Midwest and West.     

Outpatient consultations from a family practice residency program: nine years' experience

Previous reports of consultation rates from family practice physicians have included small sample sizes and have suggested higher rates in residency training programs. This report summarizes 9 years of data involving 161 family practice physicians in a residency training program and shows an overall rate of 1.4 percent for outpatient consultations. Otolaryngology, orthopedics, obstetrics/gynecology, and general surgery were the most frequent disciplines consulted. These data are helpful in designing health care systems that include family practice residency programs.     

Characteristics of and Issues Faced by Rural Female Family Physicians

The purpose of this study was to identify characteristics of and issues faced by female family physicians practicing in rural areas. A 37-item survey was designed to obtain demographic information about the background, community and practice of rural female physicians. An open-ended question regarding the issues and problems faced by female physicians in rural communities was included. Study subjects were identified from the membership of the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP). The questionnaire was mailed to all 850 active female AAFP members practicing in communities with less than 50,000 inhabitants during the winter of 1999. Completed and usable surveys were received from 587 (69.9 percent). The average age of respondents was 45. The majority were married (81.1 percent) and had children (80.1 percent). Half of the women had grown up in communities of 25,000 or less population. Twenty-seven percent of the respondents had no rural exposure in medical school; 39 percent had no rural exposure in residency; and 16 percent had no rural exposure in medical school or residency. The majority of respondents (62 percent) practiced in communities of less than 10,000. A large majority (70 percent) of these women planned to stay in the community for 10 years or more, with 58.6 percent responding that they plan to stay indefinitely. Assumptions regarding rural physicians, especially women, must be updated to accurately assist communities in recruiting rural physicians and to assist medical schools and residencies in adequately preparing graduates for rural practice.     

Family medicine residency training--three or four years?

Opinions about a four-year family practice residency were elicited from a nationally representative sample of three groups of family physicians. Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of 308 residency graduates aged 30 to 35 years, all 383 residency directors, and a random sample of 319 third-year residents. Two mailings produced an 82 percent response rate. A four-year residency was favored by 32 percent of recent graduates, 20 percent of program directors, and 34 percent of third-year residents. Over 60 percent of residents and recent graduates would have entered a family practice program had the residency been of four years' duration. Perceived barriers to a four-year residency included lack of resources, loss of appeal, and the additional time commitment. Respondents were most willing to complete a fourth year of residency to receive additional training in orthopedics, obstetrics, gynecology, and pediatrics. Many respondents believed that the additional year would be helpful in obtaining hospital privileges in obstetrics and in coronary care and intensive care units. This study provides information useful in discussions regarding extending residency training.     

Community medicine in the training of family physicians.

Family practice residency programs are encouraged to include community medicine training in their curriculum, but there is little agreement as to what community medicine is or what would constitute appropriate training. Community medicine is most commonly defined as a discipline concerned with the identification and solution of health care problems of communities or other defined populations. The inclusion of training experiences in the identification and solution of health care problems of communities has two basic advantages for family practice residency programs: it fosters a contextual approach in the care of individual patients and it builds knowledge and skills for those who will work with communities in future practices. An example of curricular content is included. A survey was conducted in order to determine what residency programs teach in the field of community medicine. The results show that few of the responding programs include the areas which most clearly relate to community medicine. It is hoped that the report of these results, the rationale presented for including community medicine in the training of family physicians, and the suggested outline of curricular content will further encourage and assist family practice residency programs to incorporate such training in their curricula.     

The Rural Physician Workforce in Florida: A Survey of US- and Foreign-Born Primary Care Physicians

CONTEXT: To meet the challenge of primary care needs in rural areas, continuing assessment of the demographics, training, and future work plans of practicing primary care physicians is needed. PURPOSE: This study's goal was to assess key characteristics of primary care physicians practicing in rural, suburban, and urban communities in Florida. METHODS: Surveys were mailed to all of Florida's rural primary care physicians (n = 399) and a 10% sampling (n = 1236) of urban and suburban primary care physicians. FINDINGS: Responses from 1000 physicians (272 rural, 385 urban, 343 suburban) showed that rural physicians were more likely to have been raised in a rural area, foreign-born and trained, a National Health Service Corps member, or a J-1 visa waiver program participant. Rural physicians were more likely to have been exposed to rural medical practice or living in a rural environment during their medical school and residency training. Factors such as rural upbringing and medical school training did not predict future rural practice with foreign-born physicians. Overall, future plans for practice did not seem to differ between rural, urban, and suburban physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Recruiting and retaining doctors in rural areas can be best supported through a mission-driven selection of medical students with subsequent training in medical school and residency in rural health issues. National programs such as the National Health Service Corps and the J-1 visa waiver program also play important roles in rural physician selection and should be taken into account when planning for future rural health care needs.     

Obstetric privileges for family physicians: a national study

In 1988 the American Academy of Family Physicians sampled 4400 active members whose mailing address was in one of the 50 states or the District of Columbia. The sample was stratified by nine census regions; after two mailings a 76.2% response rate was achieved. Nine in ten active members have hospital admission privileges. A higher proportion of family physicians in the West North Central census region have privileges at various levels of obstetric care than in other census regions. For those family physicians who do not have privileges for any obstetrics, most indicated that they chose not to include obstetric care in their hospital practices. Family physicians most likely to have obstetric privileges include those who practice in nonmetropolitan areas and those who have completed a family practice residency program. Although disparities in the proportion of family physicians with certain hospital privileges exist among regions, the majority in each region indicated that the privileges afforded them were appropriate.     

Obstetrics in family practice in the state of Ohio

Two hundred eighty-two active members of the Ohio Academy of Family Physicians responded to a survey questionnaire regarding the content of obstetrics in their practices. Factors that may influence physicians to discontinue obstetrics were also evaluated. Sixty respondents (21 percent) were performing vaginal deliveries in 1987. Only 45 (16 percent) planned to continue delivering babies beyond 1989. Family physicians who started practice within the past seven years were less likely to include obstetrics in their first year of practice than those who began practice prior to 1980. To those physicians who have eliminated obstetrics from their practice in the past five years, fear of litigation and increasing malpractice insurance costs were significantly more important issues than to their colleagues who had stopped doing obstetrics prior to 1976. Every year fewer family physicians choose to provide care to their obstetric patients. The results of this study suggest that only with changes in the medicolegal and liability environments will obstetrics continue to be a part of family practice in Ohio.     

Impact of Rural Training on Physician Work Force: The Role of Postresidency Education

Many innovative strategies have been developed over the years to improve the recruitment and retention of physicians in the shortage areas of rural America. These strategies have met with varying success. Postresidency education, or fellowship training, for family physicians is yet another strategy that has been developed for the same purpose. Most applicants have been interested in obstetrical and rural health fellowship programs as a means for preparing for rural practice. This paper describes these programs (demographics, funding, applicant pool, curriculum) and reviews their graduate outcomes (practice location after matriculation, clinical privileges). Twenty-nine obstetrical and nine rural health fellowships are currently operational in the United States. Fellows who complete a rural health fellowship have a higher tendency to locate in rural settings. Almost all graduates from obstetrical and rural health programs attain general hospital privileges in family practice, including low-risk obstetrics. A significant number of graduates from both types of programs attain privileges in high-risk and operative obstetrics as well. Fellowship training can play an integral role in the preparation of family physicians for rural practice.     

Title VII Funding and Physician Practice in Rural or Low-Income Areas

CONTEXT: Whether Title VII funding enhances physician supply in underserved areas has not clearly been established. PURPOSE: To determine the relation between Title VII funding in medical school, residency, or both, and the number of family physicians practicing in rural or low-income communities. METHODS: A retrospective cross sectional analysis was carried out using the 2000 American Academy of Family Physicians physician database, Title VII funding records, and 1990 U.S. Census data. Included were 9,107 family physicians practicing in 9 nationally representative states in the year 2000. FINDINGS: Physicians exposed to Title VII funding through medical school and residency were more likely to have their current practice in low-income communities (11.9% vs 9.9%, P< or =.02) and rural areas (24.5% vs 21.8%, P< or =.02). Physicians were more likely to practice in rural communities if they attended medical schools (24.2% vs 21.4%; P =.009) and residencies (24.0% vs 20.3%; P =.011) after the school or program had at least 5 years of Title VII funding vs before. Similar increases were not observed for practice in low-income communities. In a multivariate analysis, exposure to funding and attending an institution with more years of funding independently increased the odds of practicing in rural or low-income communities. CONCLUSIONS: Title VII funding is associated with an increase in the family physician workforce in rural and low-income communities. This effect is temporally related to initiation of funding and independently associated with effect in a multivariate analysis, suggesting a potential causal relationship. Whereas the absolute 2% increase in family physicians in these underserved communities may seem modest, it can represent a substantial increase in access to health care for community members.