Abdominal ultrasound examination in pregnant blunt trauma patients

BACKGROUND: The ability of abdominal ultrasound to detect intraperitoneal fluid in the pregnant trauma patient has been questioned. METHODS: Pregnant blunt trauma patients admitted to a Level I trauma center during an 8-year period were reviewed. Ultrasound examinations were used to detect intraperitoneal fluid and considered positive if such fluid was identified. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven (61%) of 208 pregnant patients had abdominal ultrasound during initial evaluation in the emergency department. Seven patients had intra-abdominal injuries, and six had documented hemoperitoneum. Ultrasound identified intraperitoneal fluid in five of these six patients (sensitivity, 83%; 95% confidence interval, 36-100%). In the 120 patients without intra-abdominal injury, ultrasound was negative in 117 (specificity, 98%; 95% confidence interval, 93-100%). The three patients without intra-abdominal injury but with a positive ultrasound had the following: serous intraperitoneal fluid and no injuries at laparotomy (one) and uneventful clinical courses of observation (two). CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and specificity of abdominal ultrasonography in pregnant trauma patients is similar to that seen in nonpregnant patients. Occasional false negatives occur and a negative initial examination should not be used as conclusive evidence that intra-abdominal injury is not present. Ultrasound has the advantages of no radiation exposure.     

Performance of abdominal ultrasonography in pediatric blunt trauma patients: a meta-analysis

Objective

The objective of the study was to obtain the best estimates of the test performance of abdominal ultrasonography (US) for identifying children with intraabdominal injuries (IAIs).

Methods

We gathered studies on the use of abdominal US in injured children from the following sources: a MEDLINE and Embase search, hand searches of 5 specialty journals and 4 clinical textbooks, the bibliographies of all identified articles, and contact with experts. Both prospective and retrospective studies were included if they used abdominal US for the detection of intraperitoneal fluid or IAIs in blunt trauma patients less than 18 years of age. All authors independently abstracted data from the selected studies. Disagreements between abstractors were resolved by mutual agreement.

Results

Twenty-five articles met the inclusion criteria, and 3838 children evaluated with abdominal US were included. Abdominal US had the following test characteristics for identifying children with hemoperitoneum: sensitivity, 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76%-84%); specificity, 96% (95% CI 95%-97%); positive likelihood ratio, 22.9 (95% CI 17.2-30.5); and negative likelihood ratio, 0.2 (95% CI 0.16-0.25). Using the most methodologically rigorous studies, however, yielded the following test characteristics of abdominal US for identifying children with hemoperitoneum: sensitivity, 66% (95% CI 56%-75%); specificity, 95% (95% CI 93%-97%); positive likelihood ratio, 14.5 (95% CI 9.5-22.1); and negative likelihood ratio, 0.36 (95% CI 0.27-0.47).

Conclusions

Abdominal US has a modest sensitivity for the detection of children with hemoperitoneum; however, its test performance characteristics worsen when only the most methodologically rigorous articles are included. A negative US examination has questionable utility as the sole diagnostic test to rule out the presence of IAI. Because of the high risk of IAI, a hemodynamically stable child with a positive US examination should immediately undergo abdominal computed tomographic scanning.     

Predicting the need for laparotomy in pediatric trauma patients on the basis of the ultrasound score

BACKGROUND: It is possible to quantify the amount of hemoperitoneum seen on focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) using a simple scoring system that had previously been shown to correlate with the need for subsequent laparotomy in adults. A score of 3 or greater was shown to be highly accurate in predicting the need for laparotomy. We hypothesized that this scoring system might also predict the need for laparotomy in pediatric trauma patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all records for patients 15 years and younger who underwent FAST after blunt trauma. A "positive" ultrasound examination was defined as one containing free intraperitoneal fluid with or without solid organ injury. The ultrasound score (USS) was defined as the depth of the deepest pocket of fluid collection measured in centimeters plus the number of additional spaces where fluid was seen. RESULTS: Thirty-eight (19.6%) of 193 patients who had FAST performed had positive ultrasound examinations. Thirty-seven patients with complete records were analyzed. There were no differences between patients with a USS < or = 3.0 and those with a USS > 3.0 in terms of admission pulse, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Injury Severity Score, or the proportion of patients who were initially hypotensive. One of 22 patients with a USS < or = 3.0 required therapeutic laparotomy versus 8 of 15 patients with a USS > 3.0 ( = 0.002). For a USS > 3.0, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in predicting therapeutic laparotomy were 89%, 75%, and 78%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound quantification of hemoperitoneum by a simple scoring system may serve as a useful adjunct to traditional clinical parameters in predicting the need for subsequent laparotomy in pediatric patients. Prospective validation with a larger study is required.     

The utility of clinical and laboratory data for predicting intraabdominal injury among children

BACKGROUND: The initial assessment of the child with blunt injury should lead ideally to a low rate of missed intraabdominal injury (IAI) while avoiding unnecessary imaging among children without IAI. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of clinical and laboratory data for predicting the risk for IAI. METHODS: Among 351 children evaluated for possible blunt abdominal trauma, 23 variables potentially associated with IAI were determined retrospectively. Logistic regression and recursive partitioning were used to identify variables and develop predictive models. RESULTS: Logistic regression identified four positive predictors (abdominal tenderness, abrasion, ecchymoses, and alanine aminotransferase) and two negative predictors (injury caused by a motor vehicle crash and hematocrit) for IAI. The recursive partitioning model predicted the absence of IAI with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI confidence interval, 86-100%) and a specificity of 87% (95% CI confidence interval, 81-91%) using abdominal examination and aspartate aminotransferase as discriminating variables. CONCLUSIONS: Physical examination combined with selected laboratory studies can be used to predict the risk of IAI accurately among children who sustain blunt trauma. Application of these findings may be useful in reducing costs and improving the accuracy of diagnosing IAI among children.     

Discriminatory power of 3.5 MHz convex and 7.5 MHz linear ultrasound probes for the imaging of traumatic splenic lesions: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound is a powerful tool for recognition of free fluid after blunt abdominal trauma, whereas its role for detection of organ lesions remains to be defined. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of different ultrasound transducers for the precise detection of visceral damage rather than its surrogates in case of splenic injury. METHODS: After a standardized focused abdominal sonogram for trauma protocol to screen for hemoperitoneum, 37 slim, hemodynamically stable subjects with suspected torso trauma were investigated for the extent of parenchymal lesions of the spleen using a 3.5 MHz curved array and a 7.5 MHz linear device. Helical computed tomographic scanning was carried out as the reference standard in all cases. RESULTS: Twenty patients presented splenic damage. The 7.5 MHz transducer showed higher accuracy than the lower frequency probe for the detection of tissue irregularities (difference in proportions, 16.2%; 95% confidence interval, -1.9%-33.5%). A similar trend was observed for 13 lacerations subsequently progressing to two-timed splenic rupture that required surgery (absolute risk reduction, 8.1%; 95% confidence interval, -7.6%-23.9%). With an observed prevalence of 54% for the presence of splenic injury, organ lacerations could be excluded more confidently using the linear probe (posttest probability, 16% vs. 36%). CONCLUSION: In slim patients, higher frequency linear ultrasound probes can provide therapy-relevant information on the integrity of splenic parenchyma after blunt abdominal trauma.     

Surgeon-performed ultrasound for the assessment of truncal injuries: lessons learned from 1540 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of the Focused Assessment for the Sonographic examination of the Trauma patient (FAST) when performed by trauma team members during a 3-year period, and to determine the clinical conditions in which the FAST is most accurate in the assessment of injured patients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The FAST is a rapid test that sequentially surveys the pericardial region for hemopericardium and then the right and left upper quadrants and pelvis for hemoperitoneum in patients with potential truncal injuries. The clinical conditions in which the FAST is most accurate in the assessment of injured patients have yet to be determined. METHODS: FAST examinations were performed on patients with precordial or transthoracic wounds or blunt abdominal trauma. Patients with a positive ultrasound (US) examination for hemopericardium underwent immediate surgery, whereas those with a positive US for hemoperitoneum underwent a computed tomography scan (if they were hemodynamically stable) or immediate celiotomy (if they were hemodynamically unstable- blood pressure < or = 90 mmHg). RESULTS: FAST examinations were performed in 1540 patients (1227 with blunt injuries, 313 with penetrating injuries). There were 1440 true-negative results, 80 true-positive results, 16 false-negative results, and 4 false-positive results; the sensitivity was 83.3%, the specificity 99.7%. US was most sensitive and specific for the evaluation of patients with precordial or transthoracic wounds (sensitivity 100%, specificity 99.3%) and hypotensive patients with blunt abdominal trauma (sensitivity 100%, specificity 100%). CONCLUSIONS: US should be the initial diagnostic modality for the evaluation of patients with precordial wounds and blunt truncal injuries because it is rapid and accurate. Because of the high sensitivity and specificity of US in the evaluation of patients with precordial wounds and hypotensive patients with blunt torso trauma, immediate surgical intervention is justified when those patients have a positive US examination.     

Prevalence and importance of pneumothoraces visualized on abdominal computed tomographic scan in children with blunt trauma

BACKGROUND: Chest radiographs are routinely obtained for the identification of pneumothoraces in trauma patients. Computed tomographic (CT) scanning has a higher sensitivity for the detection of pneumothoraces, but the prevalence and importance of pneumothoraces detectable by CT scan but not by chest radiography in children sustaining blunt trauma is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of children less than 16 years old with blunt trauma undergoing both abdominal CT scan and chest radiography in the emergency department of a Level I trauma center over a 28-month period. All abdominal CT scans were interpreted by a single faculty radiologist. The chest radiographs of all patients with pneumothoraces detected on CT scan as well as a random sample of chest radiographs from pediatric blunt trauma patients without pneumothoraces on abdominal CT scan (in a ratio of four normals per pneumothorax) were reviewed by a second faculty radiologist. Both radiologists were masked to all clinical data as well as to the objective of the study. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-eight children underwent both abdominal CT scan and chest radiography in the emergency department. Twenty patients (3.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-5.7%) were found to have pneumothoraces on CT scan. Of these 20 patients, 9 (45%; 95% CI, 23-68%) had pneumothoraces identified on initial chest radiography and 11 patients did not ("unsuspected pneumothoraces"). Twelve pneumothoraces were identified in these 11 patients; 6 were graded as minuscule and 6 as anterior according to a previously established scale. One patient with an unsuspected pneumothorax underwent tube thoracostomy. None of the 10 patients (0%; 95% CI, 0-26%) with unsuspected pneumothoraces who were managed without thoracostomy (including two patients who underwent positive pressure ventilation) had complications from their pneumothoraces. CONCLUSION: Less than half of pediatric blunt trauma patients with pneumothoraces visualized on abdominal CT scan had these pneumothoraces identified on initial chest radiograph. Patients with pneumothoraces identified solely on abdominal CT scan, however, uncommonly require tube thoracostomy.     

Prehospital and Emergency Department Ultrasound in Blunt Abdominal Trauma

Abstract   Blunt abdominal trauma is a challenging aspect of trauma management. Early detection has a major impact on patient outcome. In contrast to physical examination, computed tomography is known to be a sensitive and specific test for blunt abdominal injuries. However, it is time-consuming and thus contraindicated in hemodynamically unstable patients. Therefore, focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) offers a fast and easily applicable screening method to identify patients for urgent laparotomy without any further diagnostics. FAST detects, with high sensitivity, intraperitoneal fluid that accumulates in dependent areas indicating blunt abdominal trauma. FAST has been established as a gold standard early screening method for blunt abdominal trauma when performing trauma management in the emergency department (ED) based on the Advanced Trauma Life Support^? algorithm. The development of hand-held ultrasound devices facilitated the introduction of FAST into prehospital trauma management. It was demonstrated that prehospital FAST (p-FAST) can be performed with high sensitivity and specificity, and can lead to significant changes in prehospital trauma therapy and management. Standardized training with both theoretical and hands-on modules is mandatory in order to gain the skills required to perform FAST or p-FAST well. M. Ruesseler, R. Breitkreutz, T. Kirschning, and F. Walcher belong to the Working Group of Emergency Ultrasound.     

The role of prehospital ultrasound in reducing time to definitive care in abdominal trauma patients with moderate to severe liver and spleen injuries

BackgroundThe role of prehospital focused assessment sonography for trauma (FAST) is still under debate and no definitive recommendations are available in actual guidelines, moreover, the availability of ultrasound machines in emergency medical services (EMS) is still inhomogeneous. On the other hand, time to definitive care is strictly related to survival in bleeding trauma patients.This study aimed at investigating if a positive prehospital FAST in abdominal trauma patients could have a role in reducing door-to-CT scan or door-to-operating room (OR) time.MethodsThis retrospective observational study included all the patients affected by an abdominal trauma with an abdominal abbreviated injury score ≥ 2 and a spleen or liver injury admitted to Maggiore Hospital Carlo Alberto Pizzardi, a level 1 trauma centre between 2014 and 2019. Prehospital and emergency department (ED) clinical and laboratory variables were collected, as well as in-hospital times during the diagnostic and therapeutic pathways of these patients.Results199 patients were included in the final analysis. Of these, 44 had a prehospital FAST performed and in 27 of them, peritoneal free fluid was detected in the prehospital setting, while 128 out of 199 patients had a positive ED-FAST. Sensitivity was 62.9% (95% CI: 42.4%–80.6%) and specificity 100% (95% CI: 80.5% - 100%). Patients with a positive prehospital FAST reported a significantly lower door-to-CT or door-to-OR median time (46 vs 69 min, p < 0.001). Prehospital hypotension and Glasgow coma scale, first arterial blood lactate, ISS, age, positive prehospital and ED FAST were inserted in a stepwise selection for a multivariable Cox proportional regression hazards model. Only ISS and prehospital FAST resulted significantly associated with a reduction in the door-to-CT scan or door-to-operating theatre time in the multivariable model.ConclusionPrehospital FAST information of intraperitoneal free fluid could significantly hasten door-to-CT scan or door-to-operating theatre time in abdominal trauma patients if established hospital response protocols are available.Level of evidenceIII, (Therapeutic / Care Management)     

Free fluid on abdominal computed tomography without solid organ injury after blunt abdominal injury does not mandate celiotomy

BACKGROUND: Mandatory celiotomy has been proposed for all patients with unexplained free fluid on abdominal computed tomography (CT) scanning after blunt abdominal injury. This recommendation has been based upon retrospective data and concerns over the potential morbidity from the late diagnosis of blunt intestinal injury. This study examined the rate of intestinal injury in patients with free fluid on abdominal CT after blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: This study was a multicenter prospective series of all patients with blunt abdominal trauma admitted to four level I trauma centers over 22 months. Data were collected concurrently at the time of patient enrollment and included demographics, injury severity score, findings on CT scan, and presence or absence of blunt intestinal injury. This database was specifically queried for those patients who had free fluid without solid organ injury. RESULTS: In all, 2,299 patients were evaluated. Free fluid was present in 265. Of these, 90 patients had isolated free fluid with only 7 having a blunt intestinal injury. Conversely, 91% of patients with free fluid did not. All patients with free fluid were observed for a mean of 8 days (95% confidence interval 6.1 to 10.4, range 1 to 131). There were no missed injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Free fluid on abdominal CT scan does not mandate celiotomy. Serial observation with the possible use of other adjunctive tests is recommended.     

New scoring system for intra-abdominal injury diagnosis after blunt trauma

Objective： An accurate scoring system for intra-abdominal injury （IAI） based on clinical manifesta- tion and examination may decrease unnecessary CT scans, save time, and reduce healthcare cost. This study is de- signed to provide a new scoring system for a better diagno- sis of IAI after blunt trauma. Methods： This prospective observational study was performed from April 2011 to October 2012 on patients aged above 18 years and suspected with blunt abdominal trauma （BAT） admitted to the emergency department （ED） of Imam Hussein Hospital and Shohadaye Hafte Tir Hospital. All patients were assessed and treated based on Advanced Trauma Life Support and ED protocol. Diagnosis was done according to CT scan findings, which was considered as the gold standard. Data were gathered based on patient＇s history, physical exam, ultrasound and CT scan findings by a general practitioner who was not blind to this study. Chi- square test and logistic regression were done. Factors with significant relationship with CT scan were imported in multi- variate regression models, where a coefficient （13） was given based on the contribution of each of them. Scoring systemwas developed based on the obtained total [3 of each factor. Results： Altogether 261 patients （80.1% male） were enrolled （48 cases of IAI）. A 24-point blunt abdominal trauma scoring system （BATSS） was developed. Patients were di- vided into three groups including low （score〈8）, moderate （8≤score〈12） and high risk （score≥ 12）. In high risk group immediate laparotomy should be done, moderate group needs further assessments, and low risk group should be kept under observation. Low risk patients did not show positive CT-scans （specificity 100%）. Conversely, all high risk patients had positive CT-scan findings （sensitivity 100%）. The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated a close relationship between the results of CT scan and BATSS （sensitivity=99.3%）. Conclusion： The present scoring system furnishes a high precision and reproducible diagnostic tool for BAT detection and has the potential to reduce unnecessary CT scan and cut unnecessary costs.     

Significance of minimal or no intraperitoneal fluid visible on CT scan associated with blunt liver and splenic injuries: a multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND: The use of ultrasound (U/S) for the evaluation of patients with blunt abdominal trauma is gaining increasing acceptance. Patients who would have undergone computed tomographic (CT) scan may now be evaluated solely with U/S. Solid organ injuries with minimal or no free fluid may be missed by surgeon sonographers. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence and clinical importance of liver and splenic injuries with minimal or no free intraperitoneal fluid visible on CT scan. We hypothesized that these solid organ injuries occur infrequently and are of minor clinical significance. METHODS: Patient records and CT scans were reviewed for the presence of and outcome associated with blunt liver and splenic injuries with minimal (<250 mL) or no free fluid detected by an attending radiologist. Data were collected from six major trauma centers during a 4-year period before the introduction of U/S and included demographics, grade of injury (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma scale), need for operative intervention, and outcome. RESULTS: A total of 938 patients with liver and splenic injuries were identified. In this group, 11% of liver injuries and 12% of splenic injuries had no free fluid visible on CT scan and could be missed by diagnostic peritoneal lavage or U/S. Of the 938 patients, 267 (28%) met the inclusion criteria; 161 had injury to the spleen and 125 had injury to the liver. In the 267 patients studied, 97% of the injuries were managed nonoperatively. However, 8 patients (3%) required operative intervention for bleeding. Compared with the liver, the spleen was significantly more likely to bleed (p = 0.01), but the grade of splenic injury was not related to the risk for hemorrhage (p = 0.051). CONCLUSION: Data from this study suggest that injuries to the liver or spleen with minimal or no intraperitoneal fluid visible on CT scan occur more frequently than predicted but usually are of minimal clinical significance. However, patients with splenic injuries may be missed by abdominal U/S. We found a 5% associated risk of bleeding. Therefore, abdominal U/S should not be used as the sole diagnostic modality in all stable patients at risk for blunt abdominal injury.     

Prospective study of the clinical predictors of a positive abdominal computed tomography in blunt trauma patients

BACKGROUND: CT scans are often used in the evaluation of blunt trauma patients. Many scans are negative. Clinical predictors of positive abdominal CT scans would be beneficial in patient care. METHODS: A prospective study of 213 patients at a Level I trauma center presenting with blunt trauma who underwent abdominal CT scan. Indications for CT scan were analyzed statistically, using univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: Univariate chi2 tests showed abnormal pelvis x-ray (p = 0.0002) and an intubated patient (p = 0.03) were predictors of a positive CT scan. When subjected to multivariate logistic regression, these two indications were significant predictors of a positive CT scan, abnormal pelvis x-ray (p = 0.0005, OR=6.6, 95% CI), and an intubated patient (p = 0.02, OR=2.6, 95% CI). Univariate chi2 tests also showed that alcohol intoxication was statistically significant predictor of a negative CT scan (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that an abnormal pelvis x-ray and intubation are significant risk factors for a positive CT scan. Alcohol intoxication, mechanism of injury, and unreliable examination, without other associated indication for a scan, may warrant further study.     

Use of abdominal ultrasonography to assess pediatric splenic trauma. Potential pitfalls in the diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of abdominal ultrasonography (US) for screening and grading pediatric splenic injury. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The use of abdominal US has increased rapidly as a method of evaluating organ damage after blunt abdominal trauma. Despite US's increasing use, little is known about its accuracy in children with splenic injury. METHODS: Children (N = 32) suffering blunt abdominal trauma who were diagnosed with splenic injury by computerized tomography (CT) scan prospectively were enlisted in this study. Degree of splenic injury was evaluated by both CT and US. The ultrasounds were evaluated by an initial reading as well as by a radiologist who was blinded as to the results of the CT. RESULTS: Twelve (38%) of the 32 splenic injuries found on CT were missed completely on the initial reading of the US. When the ultrasounds were graded in a blinded fashion, 10 (31%) of the splenic lacerations were missed and 17 (53%) were downgraded. Seven (22%) of the 32 splenic fractures were not associated with any free intraperitoneal fluid on the CT scan. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that US has a low level of sensitivity (62% to 78%) in detecting splenic injury and downgrades the degree of injury in the majority of cases. Reliance on free intraperitoneal fluid may be inaccurate because not all patients with splenic injury have free intra-abdominal fluid. Based on these findings, US may be of limited use in the initial assessment, management, and follow-up of pediatric splenic trauma.     

The CT risk factors for the need of operative treatment in initially hemodynamically stable patients after blunt hepatic trauma

BACKGROUND: Most hemodynamically stable blunt hepatic trauma (BHT) patients are treated nonoperatively with a reported successful rate exceeding 80%. It is current clinical consensus that hemodynamic stability is the only determinant for a patient to be managed nonoperatively. However, conversion to operative treatment was found in around 10% of these patients. METHODS: There were 214 computed tomography (CT) scans of hemodynamically stable patients with main or sole BHT studied. CT findings including injury severity grading, contrast extravasation, the amount of hemoperitoneum, the degree of maceration, the depth of laceration, the size of hematoma, and the involvement of great vessels were analyzed to determine risk factors leading to the need of operative treatment. RESULTS: Intraperitoneal contrast extravasation, hemoperitoneum in six compartments, maceration >2 segments, high Mirvis' CT grade as well as American Association for the Surgery of Trauma injury scale, laceration > or =6 cm in depth, and porta hepatis involvement occurred significantly more frequently (p < or = 0.001, respectively) in patients who needed operative treatment. Logistic regression analysis identified "intraperitoneal contrast extravasation" (RR = 12.5, 95% CI: 7.8-20.0; p < 0.001) and "hemoperitoneum in six compartments" (RR = 22, 95% CI: 9.7-49.4; p < 0.001) to independently contribute to the need of operative treatment. CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal contrast extravasation and hemoperitoneum in six compartments on CT scan both indicate massive or active hemorrhage and should be regarded as high risk for the need of operation in hemodynamically stable patients after BHT. Patients with low risk profile can be successfully treated with nonoperative modalities.     

Computed tomographic scanning and selective laparoscopy in the diagnosis of blunt bowel injury: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: We prospectively evaluated whether computed tomographic (CT) scanning and selective laparoscopy (LP) for the diagnosis of blunt bowel injury (BBI) could prevent nontherapeutic laparotomy and delayed diagnosis. METHODS: Between April 1994 and May 2002, hemodynamically stable patients suspected of having BBI were enrolled in this study. Patients with hemodynamic instability or solid organ injuries with hemoperitoneum were excluded. All patients underwent a physical examination and contrast CT scanning at admission and once again approximately 12 hours (range, 6-24 hours) after admission. LP was performed under general anesthesia in patients who had local peritoneal signs and indirect CT signs (bowel thickening or isolated intraperitoneal fluid) or in whom abdominal pain or tenderness increased or intraperitoneal fluid increased on the repeat CT scan. The indications for a celiotomy were diffuse peritonitis, pneumoperitoneum on the abdominal CT scan, or bowel perforation visible on LP. RESULTS: During the study period, 399 of 1,074 patients admitted for blunt torso injuries were enrolled in this study. Eleven patients underwent emergency celiotomy and 11 underwent LP immediately after admission to the emergency department. One nontherapeutic laparotomy was performed among the patients who underwent celiotomy. The LPs revealed seven bowel perforations and one mesenteric laceration. After a repeat CT scan, three and seven of the patients underwent laparotomy and LP, respectively. Four bowel perforations were found by LP. The remaining 198 patients were treated conservatively, and no complications related to a delayed BBI diagnosis occurred. CONCLUSION: CT scanning and selective LP can prevent nontherapeutic laparotomy and delayed diagnosis in patients with suspected BBI.     

Not so FAST

BACKGROUND: Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) as a screening tool in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma will lead to underdiagnosis of abdominal injuries and may have an impact on treatment and outcome in trauma patients. METHODS: From October 2001 to June 2002, a protocol for evaluating hemodynamically stable trauma patients with suspected blunt abdominal injury (BAI) admitted to our institution was implemented using FAST examination as a screening tool for BAI and computed tomographic (CT) scanning of the abdomen and pelvis as a confirmatory test. At the completion of the secondary survey, patients underwent a four-view FAST examination (Sonosite, Bothell, WA) followed within 1 hour by an abdominal/pelvic CT scan. The FAST examination was considered positive if it demonstrated evidence of free intra-abdominal fluid. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging results were recorded at admission, and FAST examination results were compared with CT scan findings, noting the discordance. RESULTS: Patients with suspicion for BAI were evaluated according to protocol (n = 372). Thirteen cases were excluded for inadequate FAST examinations, leaving 359 patients for analysis. There were 313 true-negative FAST examinations, 16 true-positives, 22 false-negatives, and 8 false-positives. Using CT scanning as the confirmatory test for hemoperitoneum, FAST examination had a sensitivity of 42%, a specificity of 98%, a positive predictive value of 67%, a negative predictive value of 93%, and an accuracy of 92%; chi analysis showed significant discordance between FAST examination and CT scan (5.85%, < 0.001). Six patients with false-negative FAST examinations required laparotomy for intra-abdominal injuries; 16 patients required admission for nonoperative management of injury. Of the 313 true-negative FAST examinations, 19 patients were noted to have intra-abdominal injuries without hemoperitoneum and 11 patients were noted to have retroperitoneal injuries. CONCLUSION: Use of FAST examination as a screening tool for BAI in the hemodynamically stable trauma patient results in underdiagnosis of intra-abdominal injury. This may have an impact on treatment and outcome in trauma patients. Hemodynamically stable patients with suspected BAI should undergo routine CT scanning.     

Isolated free fluid on computed tomographic scan in blunt abdominal trauma: a systematic review of incidence and management

BACKGROUND: Abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scan is accepted as the primary diagnostic modality in stable patients with blunt abdominal trauma. A recent survey of 328 trauma surgeons demonstrated marked variation in the management of patients with head injuries and the finding of free intra-abdominal fluid without solid organ injury on CT scan. This study was undertaken to attempt to determine what to do when free fluid without solid organ injury is seen on abdominal CT scan in patients with blunt trauma. METHODS: Articles concerning the incidence and significance of free intra-abdominal fluid on CT scan of blunt trauma patients without solid organ injury were systematically reviewed. A MEDLINE search was performed using terms such as tomography-x-ray computed, wounds-nonpenetrating, small intestine/injuries, time factors, and abdominal trauma and diagnostic tests. Bibliographies of pertinent articles were reviewed. Appropriate articles were evaluated for quality and data were combined to reach a conclusion. RESULTS: Meta-analysis could not be performed because no randomized, prospective, controlled trials could be found. Forty-one articles were excluded from the analysis because they looked at only patients with known injuries to intestine, diaphragm, or pancreas and the investigation of the CT scan findings did not include negative scans. Ten articles, which described CT scan results for all patients presenting with blunt abdominal trauma for a defined period of time, formed the basis of this study. Isolated free fluid was seen in 463 (2.8%) of over 16,000 blunt trauma patients scanned. A therapeutic laparotomy was performed in only 122 (27%) of these patients. CONCLUSION: The isolated finding of free intra-abdominal fluid on CT scan in patients with blunt trauma and no solid organ injury does not warrant laparotomy. Alert patients may be followed with physical examination. Patients with altered mental status should undergo diagnostic peritoneal lavage.     

Understanding abdominal pelvic computerized tomography scan usage amongst adolescent blunt trauma patients treated at adult trauma centers

IntroductionThe algorithm for evaluating adolescent patients with blunt trauma includes abdominal pelvic CT (APCT). The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of APCT in this context.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of adolescent (11 to 18 years of age) blunt trauma patients at an urban adult level 1 trauma center from January 2015 to December 2019. The primary outcome was the prevalence of positive findings on APCT scan.  Additionally, clinical risk factors concerning for intra-abdominal injury were analyzed.ResultsThere were 546 patients evaluated for blunt trauma and the prevalence of APCT within the population was 59.3% (95% CI 54.2%-64.9%). Of the patients who received APCT, 123 (37.9%) had positive findings on APCT. Only 25 patients (7.7% of those who underwent APCT) required abdominal surgery while 40 patients (12.3%) had intraabdominal injury that did not require surgery. Risk factors were present in 100% of patients with intraabdominal injury and absent in 28.7% of patients without intraabdominal injury. Abnormal abdominal exam, abnormal FAST, positive chest x-ray and elevated transaminases were independently associated with intraabdominal injury.ConclusionsOur study found that adolescent blunt trauma patients treated at our trauma center had a higher rate of APCT usage, but a comparable rate of positive findings when compared with the most recent literature. Future studies should focus on reducing the number of patients who undergo APCT despite an absence of clinical risk factors.     

The importance of fracture pattern in guiding therapeutic decision-making in patients with hemorrhagic shock and pelvic ring disruptions

BACKGROUND: Pelvic fractures may be associated with significant hemorrhage. Although this hemorrhage may emanate from the pelvic vasculature, it may also be secondary to abdominal visceral injury. The purpose of this study was to determine factors associated with pelvic and/or abdominal visceral bleeding in hypotensive patients with pelvic fractures to guide the appropriate therapeutic intervention sequence for these difficult-to-manage patients. METHODS: Medical records of all hypotensive (systolic blood pressure < or = 90 mm Hg) patients with pelvic fractures seen at a Level I trauma center from January 1995 to December 1999 were evaluated. Records were abstracted for age, base deficit, 24-hour blood requirement, hemoperitoneum (positive ultrasound, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, or computed tomographic scan), abdominal hemorrhage discovered at celiotomy, pelvic hemorrhage discovered at angiography, emergency department disposition, Injury Severity Score, and mortality. Pelvic fracture categories were derived by adapting the Young-Burgess pelvic fracture classification scheme. Lateral compression (LC) I and anteroposterior compression (APC) I fractures were characterized as stable fracture patterns (SFPs), and APC II, APC III, LC II, LC III, and vertical shear were characterized as unstable fracture patterns (UFPs). RESULTS: Of 231 hypotensive patients, 38 patients died in the emergency department, leaving 193 surviving initial resuscitation. One hundred seven patients stabilized (group I) and were transferred to the intensive care unit. Eighty-six patients (group II) required ongoing resuscitation and underwent celiotomy and/or angiography in an attempt to manage their hemorrhage. Within group II, in the SFP population, abdominal hemorrhage was responsible for hypotension in 34 of 40 (85%), and 10 patients died (25%). In patients with UFP injury, hemorrhage was predominantly from a pelvic source, as shown by 27 positive angiograms in the 46 patients (59%). Twenty-four of 46 (52%) UFP patients died. In patients with a UFP, 14 had both angiography and celiotomy. Four patients underwent angiography before celiotomy and one of four (mortality, 25%) died. In contrast, 10 patients underwent celiotomy before angiography and 6 of 10 died (mortality, 60%). CONCLUSION: Patients with signs of ongoing shock with SFP pelvic injury and hemoperitoneum require celiotomy as the initial intervention, as the hemorrhagic focus is predominantly intraperitoneal. In patients with UFP, even in the presence of hemoperitoneum, consideration should be given to angiography before celiotomy.