Postoperative Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in High Risk Prostate Cancer: A Dosimetric Comparison

The aim of this study was to compare intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with 3D conformal technique (3D-CRT), with respect to target coverage and irradiation of organs at risk for high dose postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) of the prostate fossa. 3D-CRT and IMRT treatment plans were compared with respect to dose to the rectum and bladder. The dosimetric comparison was carried out in 15 patients considering 2 different scenarios: (1) exclusive prostate fossa irradiation, and (2) pelvic node irradiation followed by a boost on the prostate fossa. In scenario (1), a 3D-CRT plan (box technique) and an IMRT plan were calculated and compared for each patient. In scenario (2), 3 treatment plans were calculated and compared for each patient: (a) 3D-CRT box technique for both pelvic (prophylactic nodal irradiation) and prostate fossa irradiation (3D-CRT only); (b) 3D-CRT box technique for pelvic irradiation followed by an IMRT boost to the prostatic fossa (hybrid 3D-CRT and IMRT); and (c) IMRT for both pelvic and prostate fossa irradiation (IMRT only). For exclusive prostate fossa irradiation, IMRT significantly reduced the dose to the rectum (lower Dmean, V50%, V75%, V90%, V100%, EUD, and NTCP) and the bladder (lower Dmean, V50%, V90%, EUD and NTCP). When prophylactic irradiation of the pelvis was also considered, plan C (IMRT only) performed better than plan B (hybrid 3D-CRT and IMRT) as respect to both rectum and bladder irradiation (reduction of Dmean, V50%, V75%, V90%, equivalent uniform dose [EUD], and normal tissue complication probability [NTCP]). Plan (b) (hybrid 3D-CRT and IMRT) performed better than plan (a) (3D-CRT only) with respect to dose to the rectum (lower Dmean, V75%, V90%, V100%, EUD, and NTCP) and the bladder (Dmean, EUD, and NTCP). Postoperative IMRT in prostate cancer significantly reduces rectum and bladder irradiation compared with 3D-CRT.     

Postoperative Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the extent of target motion in postprostatectomy radiotherapy (RT) and the value of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 20 patients underwent CT scans in supine position with both a full bladder (FB) and an empty bladder (EB) before RT and at three dates during the RT series. Displacements of the CTV (clinical target volume) center of mass and the posterior border were determined. 3D-CRT and IMRT treatment plans were compared regarding homogeneity, conformity, and dose to organs at risk. RESULTS: In the superior-inferior direction, larger displacements were found for EB compared to FB scans; anterior-posterior and right-left displacements were similar. With an initial rectum volume of < 115 cm(3), 90% of displacements at the posterior border were within a margin of 6 mm. The non-target volume irradiated in the high-dose area doubled in 3D-CRT versus IMRT plans (80 cm(3) vs. 38 cm(3) encompassed by the 95% isodose). Bladder dose was significantly lower with IMRT, but no advantage was found for the integral rectal dose. An adequate bladder filling was paramount to reduce the dose to the bladder. CONCLUSION: Postprostatectomy RT can be recommended with FB due to an improved CTV position consistency and a lower dose to the bladder. With improved non-target tissue and bladder volume sparing, IMRT is an option for dose escalation. However, this analysis did not find an advantage concerning the integral rectal dose with IMRT versus 3D-CRT.     

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for a prostate patient with a metal prosthesis

When treating prostate patients having a metallic prosthesis with radiation, a 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) treatment plan is commonly created using only those fields that avoid the prosthesis in the beam’s-eye view (BEV). With a limited number of portals, the resulting plan may compromise the dose sparing of the rectum and bladder. In this work, we investigate the feasibility of using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to treat prostate patients having a metallic prosthesis. Three patients, each with a single metallic prosthesis, who were previously treated at the University of Chicago Medical Center for prostate cancer, were selected for this study. Clinical target volumes (CTV = prostate + seminal vesicles), bladder, and rectum volumes were identified on CT slices. Planning target volumes (PTV) were generated in 3D by a 1-cm expansion of the CTVs. For these comparative studies, treatment plans were generated from CT data using 3DCRT and IMRT treatment planning systems. The IMRT plans used 9 equally-spaced 6-MV coplanar fields, with each field avoiding the prosthesis. The 3DCRT plans used 5 coplanar 18-MV fields, with each field avoiding the prosthesis. A 1-cm margin around the PTV was used for the blocks. Each of the 9-field IMRT plans spared the bladder and rectum better than the corresponding 3DCRT plan. In the IMRT, plans, a bladder volume receiving 80% or greater dose decreased by 20–77 cc, and a volume rectal volume receiving 80% or greater dose decreased by 24–40 cc. One negative feature of the IMRT plans was the homogeneity across the target, which ranged from 95% to 115%.     

IMRT to Escalate the Dose to the Prostate while Treating the Pelvic Nodes

Background and Purpose: To assess and quantify the benefit of introducing intensity–modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) over conventional approaches to cover the pelvic nodes while escalating the dose to the prostate gland.Material and Methods: The pelvic lymphatics were planned to receive 50 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction by four–field box (4FB) technique and standard field blocks drawn on digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR), 4FB with field blocks according to the position of pelvic nodes as contoured on serial planning CT slices, or IMRT. The lateral fields included three different variations of field blocks to assess the role of various degrees of rectal shielding. The boost consisted in 26 Gy in 13 fractions delivered via six–field three–dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or IMRT. By the combination of a pelvic treatment and boost, several plans were obtained for each patient, all normalized to be isoeffective with regard to prostate–planning target volume (PTV–P) coverage. Plans were compared with respect to dose–volume histogram (DVH) of pelvic nodes/seminal vesicles–PTV (PTV–PN/SV), rectum, bladder and intestinal cavity. Reported are the results obtained in eight patients.Results: Pelvic IMRT with a conformal boost provided superior sparing of both bladder and rectum over any of the 4FB plans with the same boost. For the rectum the advantage was around 10% at V70 and even larger for lower doses. Coverage of the pelvic nodes was adequate with initial IMRT with about 98% of the volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose. An IMRT boost provided a gain in rectal sparing as compared to a conformal boost. However, the benefit was always greater with pelvic IMRT followed by a conformal boost as compared to 4FB with IMRT boost. Finally, the effect of utilizing an IMRT boost with initial pelvic IMRT was greater for the bladder than for the rectum (at V70, about 9% and 3% for the bladder and rectum, respectively).Conclusion: IMRT to pelvic nodes with a conformal boost allows dose escalation to the prostate while respecting current dose objectives in the majority of patients and it is dosimetrically superior to 4FB. An IMRT boost should be considered for patients who fail to meet bladder dose objectives.     

Treatment and Dosimetric Advantages Between VMAT, IMRT, and Helical TomoTherapy in Prostate Cancer

We investigated the possible treatment and dosimetric advantage of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) over step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy (step-and-hhoot IMRT) and helical tomotherapy (HT). Twelve prostate cancer patients undergoing VMAT to the prostate were included. Three treatment plans (VMAT, step-and-shoot IMRT, HT) were generated for each patient. The doses to clinical target volume and 95% of planning target volume were both ≥78 Gy. Target coverage, conformity index, dose to rectum/bladder, monitor units (MU), treatment time, equivalent uniform dose (EUD), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of targets, and rectum/bladder were compared between techniques. HT provided superior conformity and significantly less rectal volume exposed to 65 Gy and 40 Gy, as well as EUD/NTCP of rectum than step-and-shoot IMRT, whereas VMAT had a slight dosimetric advantage over step-and-shoot IMRT. Notably, significantly lower MUs were needed for VMAT (309.7 ± 35.4) and step-and-shoot IMRT (336.1 ± 16.8) than for HT (3368 ± 638.7) (p < 0.001). The treatment time (minutes) was significantly shorter for VMAT (2.6 ± 0.5) than step-and-shoot IMRT (3.8 ± 0.3) and HT (3.8 ± 0.6) (p < 0.001). Dose verification of VMAT using point dose and film dosimetry met the accepted criteria. VMAT and step-and-shoot IMRT have comparable dosimetry, but treatment efficiency is significantly higher for VMAT than for step-and-shoot IMRT and HT.     

Dosimetric advantage and clinical implication of a micro-multileaf collimator in the treatment of prostate with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

This paper investigates the dosimetric benefits of a micro-multileaf (4-mm leaf width) collimator (mMLC) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning of the prostate cancer and its potential application for dose escalation and hypofractionation. We compared treatment plans for IMRT delivery using 2 different multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf widths (4 vs. 10 mm) for 10 patients with prostate cancer. Treatment planning was performed on the XknifeRT2 treatment planning system. All beams and optimization parameters were identical for the mMLC and MLC plans. All of the plans were normalized to ensure that 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) received 100% of the prescribed dose (74 Gy). The differences in dose distribution between the 2 groups of plans using the mMLC and the MLC were assessed by dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis of the target and critical organs. Significant reductions in the volume of rectum receiving medium to higher doses were achieved using the mMLC. The average decrease in the volume of the rectum receiving 40, 50, and 60 Gy using the mMLC plans was 40.2%, 33.4%, and 17.7%, respectively, with p-values less than 0.0001 for V40 and V50 and 0.012 for V60. The mean dose reductions for D17 and D35 for the rectum were 20.0% (p < 0.0001) and 18.3% (p < 0.0002), respectively, when compared to those with the MLC plans. There were consistent reductions in all dose indices studied for the bladder. The target dose inhomogeneity was improved in the mMLC plans by an average of 32%. In the high-dose range, there was no significant difference in the dose deposited in the "hottest" 1 cc of the rectum between the 2 MLC plans for all cases (p > 0.78). Because of the reduction of rectal volume receiving medium to higher doses, dose to the prostate target can be escalated by about 20 Gy to over 74 Gy, while keeping the rectal dose (either denoted by D17 or D35) the same as those with the use of the MLC. The maximum achievable dose, derived when the rectum is allowed to reach the tolerance level, was found to be in the range of 113-172 Gy (using the tolerance value of D17). We conclude that the use of the mMLC for IMRT of the prostate may facilitate dose hypofractionation due to its dosimetric advantage in significantly improving the DVH parameters of the prostate and critical organs. When used for conventional fractionation scheme, mMLC for IMRT of the prostate may reduce the toxicity to the critical organs.     

Feasibility of IMRT to Cover Pelvic Nodes While Escalating the Dose to the Prostate Gland: Dosimetric Data on 35 Consecutive Patients

Utilizing available dosimetric and acute toxicity data, we confirm the feasibility of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to include treatment of the pelvic nodes (PN) while escalating the dose to the prostate. Data were obtained from 35 consecutive patients with prostate cancer with ≥15% risk of PN involvement. Patients received an initial boost to the prostate, delivering 16 Gy over 8 fractions using a 6-field conformal technique, followed by an 8-field coplanar inverse planning IMRT technique delivering an additional 60 Gy over 30 fractions to the prostate (76 Gy total) and 54 Gy over 30 fractions to the seminal vesicles (SV) and PN. Dose-volume histogram analysis was performed for planning target volumes and organs at risk. Acute toxicity (RTOG/EORTC scale) was prospectively and independently scored weekly for each patient. The maximum, mean, minimum dose, and D95 to each planning target volume is provided: prostate (82.2, 78.2, 72.6, 75.2 Gy), SV (79.0, 72.5, 56.9, 61.1 Gy), and PN (80.4, 59.7, 46.5, 53.3 Gy), respectively. The percent volume receiving a dose at or above “x” Gy (Vx) was recorded for V75, V70, V65, V60, and V50 as: bladder (14%, 24%, 32%, 39%, and 54%) and rectum (3%, 18%, 26%, 34%, and 51%), respectively. Acute toxicity was as follows: 54% grade 2+ GI (n = 19), 25% grade 2+ GU (n = 9). IMRT enables treatment of pelvic nodes while escalating dose to the prostate and is clinically feasible with acute toxicity within expected ranges.     

Helical tomotherapy for radiotherapy in esophageal cancer: a preferred plan with better conformal target coverage and more homogeneous dose distribution.

We compare different radiotherapy techniques-helical tomotherapy (tomotherapy), step-and-shoot IMRT (IMRT), and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT)-for patients with mid-distal esophageal carcinoma on the basis of dosimetric analysis. Six patients with locally advanced mid-distal esophageal carcinoma were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery. Radiotherapy included 50 Gy to gross planning target volume (PTV) and 45 Gy to elective PTV in 25 fractions. Tomotherapy, IMRT, and 3DCRT plans were generated. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs), homogeneity index (HI), volumes of lung receiving more than 10, 15, or 20 Gy (V(10), V(15), V(20)), and volumes of heart receiving more than 30 or 45 Gy (V(30), V(45)) were determined. Statistical analysis was performed by paired t-tests. By isodose distributions and DVHs, tomotherapy plans showed sharper dose gradients, more conformal coverage, and better HI for both gross and elective PTVs compared with IMRT or 3DCRT plans. Mean V(20) of lung was significantly reduced in tomotherapy plans. However, tomotherapy and IMRT plans resulted in larger V(10) of lung compared to 3DCRT plans. The heart was significantly spared in tomotherapy and IMRT plans compared to 3DCRT plans in terms of V(30) and V(45). We conclude that tomotherapy plans are superior in terms of target conformity, dose homogeneity, and V(20) of lung.     

Sparing of the penile bulb and proximal penile structures with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer

Quality of life is an important consideration in the treatment of early prostate cancer. Laboratory and clinical data suggest that higher radiation doses delivered to the bulb of penis and proximal penile structures correlates with higher rates of post-radiation impotence. The goal of this investigation was to determine if intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) spares dose to the penile bulb while maintaining coverage of the prostate. 10 consecutive patients with clinically organ confined prostate cancer were planned with 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) or IMRT to give a dose of 74 Gy without specifically constraining the plans to spare the penile bulb. All 10 patients were ultimately treated with IMRT. Dose-volume histograms were evaluated and the doses to prostate, rectum, bladder and penile bulb were compared. IMRT reduced the mean penile bulb doses compared with 3D-CRT (33.2 Gy vs 48.9 Gy, p<0.001), the percentage of penile bulb receiving over 40 Gy (37.7% vs 67.2%, p<0.001) and the dose received by >95% of penile bulb (5.3 Gy vs 11.7 Gy, p=0.003). Maximum penile bulb doses were higher with IMRT (81.2 Gy vs 73.1 Gy, p<0.001) although the volume of this high dose region was small. Both methods resulted in similar coverage of the prostate. The volume of rectum receiving 70 Gy was significantly reduced with IMRT (18.4% vs 21.9%, p=0.003) but the volumes of bladder receiving 70 Gy were similar (p=0.3). IMRT may potentially reduce long term sexual morbidity by reducing the dose to the majority of the penile bulb.     

Preoperative Radiation Treatment for Rectal Cancer: Comparison of Target Coverage and Small Bowel NTCP in Conventional vs. 3D-Conformal Planning

A prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the improvement in rectal cancer radiation treatment achieved with the implementation of target delineation for conformal radiotherapy, replacing conventional technique using standard radiological anatomy for target volume definition. In 10 patients receiving preoperative pelvic irradiation for rectal cancer, a 3-field technique was designed by a 3-dimensional (3D) planning system. Two plans were simulated for each patient, one with the fields designed in the conventional way based on radiological anatomy, and the other with the fields designed on the basis of a computed tomography (CT) delineated planning target volume (PTV). A total dose of 45 Gy in 25-daily fractions of 1.8 Gy in 5 weeks was planned. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of PTV, small bowel, anal sphincter, and urinary bladder were analyzed to compare plans. The minimum, maximum, and mean dose in the PTV and in critical organs were also evaluated. The inhomogeneity coefficient (IC) and the target coverage (TC) were calculated. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for each organ at risk (OAR) was determined. NTCP for small bowel and urinary bladder was not statistically different, while the PTV coverage was significantly lower with conventional treatment relative to conformal treatment (median IC = 7.2, median TC = 0.91 vs. median IC = 0.14 and median TC = 1, p < 0.005). The 3D conformal treatment plan in preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer improves target coverage without significantly affecting small bowel and urinary bladder NTCP.     

Development of a simultaneous boost IMRT class solution for a hypofractionated prostate cancer protocol

The purpose of this work was to develop a robust technique for planning intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer patients who are to be entered into a proposed hypofractionated dose escalation study. In this study the dose escalation will be restricted to the prostate alone, which may be regarded as a concurrent boost volume within the overall planning target volume (PTV). The dose to the prostate itself is to be delivered in 3 Gy fractions, and for this phase of the study the total prostate dose will be 57 Gy in 19 fractions, with 50 Gy prescribed to the rest of the PTV. If acute toxicity results are acceptable, the next phase will escalate doses to 60 Gy in 20 x 3 Gy fractions. There will be 30 patients in each arm. This work describes the class solution which was developed to create IMRT plans for this study, and which enabled the same set of inverse planning parameters to be used during optimization for every patient with minimal planner intervention. The resulting dose distributions were compared with those that would be achieved from a 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) technique that used a multileaf collimator (MLC) but no intensity modulation to treat the PTV, followed by a sequential boost to raise the prostate to 57 Gy. The two methods were tested on anatomical data sets for a series of 10 patients who would have been eligible for this study, and the techniques were compared in terms of doses to the target volumes and the organs at risk. The IMRT method resulted in much greater sparing of the rectum and bladder than the 3DCRT technique, whilst still delivering acceptable doses to the target volumes. In particular, the volume of rectum receiving the minimum PTV dose of 47.5 Gy was reduced from a mean value of 36.9% (range 23.4% to 61.0%) to 18.6% (10.3% to 29.0%). In conclusion, it was found possible to use a class solution approach to produce IMRT dose escalated plans. This IMRT technique has since been implemented clinically for patients enrolled in the hypofractionated dose escalation study.     

调强适形照射技术对前列腺癌放射治疗剂量学的意义

目的 :通过三维放射治疗计划系统分别采用不同照射技术设计 ,以探讨调强适形放射治疗技术 (IMRT)的最佳剂量分布。方法 :选取一前列腺癌病例 ,对其分别进行常规、适形和调强适形三种放射治疗计划的设计 ,利用剂量体积曲线图 (DVH)等方法评价不同技术对肿瘤靶区和正常组织受照剂量的结果 ,治疗剂量为 3 0Gy。结果 :在得到相同处方剂量的前提下 ,直肠和膀胱受照剂量 >2 0Gy的体积百分比 ,常规计划照射分别为 82 %和 85 % ;适形计划照射分别为 68%和3 5 % ;而调强适形计划照射则均为 3 2 %。结论 :虽然三种放射治疗技术均能满足肿瘤靶区的剂量学要求 ,但对正常组织的受照剂量则有很大的差异 ,IMRT剂量分布对正常组织的保护有明显的优势。     

Dose to Bone Marrow Using IMRT Techniques in Prostate Cancer Patients

Purpose: To investigate the dose distribution in active bone marrow of patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer and compare it to the distribution in the same patients, if they had been treated using conformal plans, in order to develop criteria for optimization to minimize the estimated risk of secondary leukemia. Patients and Methods: Mean bone marrow doses were calculated for ten patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent whole-pelvis IMRT and compared to three-dimensional conformal (3-D CRT) plans prepared for the same patients. Also for comparison, the IMRT and 3-D CRT plans were produced to simulate the treatment of the prostate gland only. To measure the dose to extrapelvic bone marrow, three thermoluminescent diode (TLD) chips were placed in the middle of the sternum region inside the Rando phantom. Results: For both the pelvic and prostate-only volumes, the IMRT plans were superior to 3-D CRT plans in reducing the high dose volume to the rectum, the bladder and the small bowel while maintaining acceptable coverage of the planning target volume (PTV). For the pelvic treatment group the IMRT plans, compared to 3-D CRT, reduced the high dose volume (> 20 Gy) to os coxae, which is the main contributor of dose to pelvic bone marrow, but increased the middle dose volume (10–20 Gy). No statistically significant differences were observed for lower dose volumes (< 5 Gy). For the prostate-only treatment the IMRT plan increased the high dose volume and slightly decreased the low dose volume of pelvic bone marrow. However, for both treatments the leakage dose to extrapelvic sites was higher by a factor of 2 in IMRT plans. Conclusion: There are significant differences in the dose-volume histograms of bone marrow doses from 3-D CRT and from IMRT. Pronounced dose inhomogeneity reduces the risk of leukemia compared to homogeneous radiation exposure of the bone marrow. The mean bone marrow dose is therefore not a useful criterion to judge plan quality, since scattered low doses to distant sites may be more critical than the high dose volumes receiving > 10 Gy. The number of monitor units needed to deliver an IMRT plan affects leakage dose and their incorporation into planning constraints should be considered.     

A dosimetric evaluation of dose escalation for the radical treatment of locally advanced vulvar cancer by intensity-modulated radiation therapy

The purpose of this planning study was to determine whether intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces the radiation dose to organs at risk (OAR) when compared with 3D conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in patients with vulvar cancer treated by irradiation. This study also investigated the use of sequential IMRT boost (seq-IMRT) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-IMRT) for dose escalation in the treatment of locally advanced vulvar cancer. Five vulvar cancer patients treated in the postoperative setting and 5 patients treated with definitive intent (def-group) were evaluated. For the postoperative group, 3D-CRT and IMRT plans to a total dose (TD) of 45 Gy were generated. For the def-group, 4 plans were generated: a 3D-CRT and an IMRT plan to a TD of 56.4 Gy, a SIB-IMRT plan to a TD of 56 Gy, and a SIB-IMRT with dose escalation (SIB-IMRT-esc): TD of 67.2 Gy. Mean dose and dose-volume histograms were compared using Student's t-test. IMRT significantly (all p < 0.05) reduced the D_mean, V30, and V40 for all OAR in the adjuvant setting. The V45 was also significantly reduced for all OAR except the bladder. For patients treated in the def-group, all IMRT techniques significantly reduced the D_mean, V40, and V45 for all OAR. The mean femur doses with SIB-IMRT and SIB-IMRT-esc were 47% and 49% lower compared with 3D-CRT. SIB-IMRT-esc reduced the doses to the OAR compared with seq-3D-CRT but increased the D_max. for the small bowel, rectum, and bladder. IMRT reduces the dose to the OAR compared with 3D-CRT in patients with vulvar cancer receiving irradiation to a volume covering the vulvar region and nodal areas without compromising the dosimetric coverage of the target volume. IMRT for vulvar cancer is feasible and an attractive option for dose escalation studies.     

3D-Conformal Versus Intensity-Modulated Postoperative Radiotherapy of Vaginal Vault: A Dosimetric Comparison

We evaluated a step-and-shoot IMRT plan in the postoperative irradiation of the vaginal vault compared with equispaced beam arrangements (3–5) 3D-radiotherapy (RT) optimized plans. Twelve patients were included in this analysis. Four plans for each patient were compared in terms of dose-volume histograms, homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI): (1) 3 equispaced beam arrangement 3D-RT; (2) 4 equispaced beam arrangement 3D-RT; (3) 5 equispaced beam arrangement 3D-RT; (4) step-and-shoot IMRT technique. CI showed a good discrimination between the four plans. The mean scores of CI were 0.58 (range: 0.38–0.67) for the 3F-CRT plan, 0.58 (range: 0.41–0.66) for 4F-CRT, 0.62 (range: 0.43–0.68) for 5F-CRT and 0.69 (range: 0.58–0.78) for the IMRT plan. A significant improvement of the conformity was reached by the IMRT plan (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). As expected, the increment of 3D-CRT fields was associated with an improvement of target dose conformity and homogeneity; on the contrary, in the IMRT plans, a better conformity was associated to a worse target dose homogeneity. A significant reduction in terms of D_mean, V90%, V95%, V100% was recorded for rectal and bladder irradiation with the IMRT plan. Surprisingly, IMRT supplied a significant dose reduction also for rectum and bladder V30% and V50%. A significant dosimetric advantage of IMRT over 3D-RT in the adjuvant treatment of vaginal vault alone in terms of treatment conformity and rectum and bladder sparing is shown.     

Direct Segment Aperture and Weight Optimization for Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To describe the implementation and to evaluate the results of direct segment aperture optimization using the segment outline and weight adapting tool (SOWAT) in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 14 consecutive, unselected patients with localized prostate cancer were entered in a planning study comparing IMRT without and with the use of SOWAT. The clinical target volume (CTV) consisted of the prostate and seminal vesicles in all cases. To create the planning target volume (PTV), a three-dimensional anisotropic margin (10 mm in craniocaudal direction, 7 mm in both other directions) was used. To compare both plans, physical as well as biological endpoints were considered. RESULTS: Considering the CTV, SOWAT resulted in a significantly higher minimal dose together with a higher dose to 95% (D(95)) and 90% (D(90)) of the CTV volume (p < 0.05; Figure 2). Target dose homogeneity was significantly improved (p < 0.001). Tumor control probability (TCP) was significantly increased (p < 0.05). Considering the PTV, D(90) was significantly increased (p < 0.05). Target dose homogeneity was significantly improved (p < 0.05; Figure 1). For rectum, the volumes receiving 50 Gy (R(vol50)), 60 Gy (R(vol60)), or 65 Gy (R(vol65)) as well as the mean dose were significantly lowered after SOWAT (p = 0.0001; Figure 3). Rectal normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) was significantly lower after SOWAT (p = 0.005). Probability of uncomplicated local control (P+) was significantly higher after SOWAT (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: SOWAT is a powerful planning tool to increase the therapeutic ratio of IMRT for prostate cancer. It leaves the delivery time unchanged, so that treatments can still be delivered within a time slot of 8 min.     

Pelvic Ewing sarcomas

Purpose

The goal of the present work was to assess the potential advantage of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) over three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) planning in pelvic Ewing’s sarcoma.

Patients and methods

A total of 8 patients with Ewing sarcoma of the pelvis undergoing radiotherapy were analyzed. Plans for 3D-CRT and IMRT were calculated for each patient. Dose coverage of the planning target volume (PTV), conformity and homogeneity indices, as well as further parameters were evaluated.

Results

The average dose coverage values for PTV were comparable in 3D-CRT and IMRT plans. Both techniques had a PTV coverage of V₉₅ >?98?% in all patients. Whereas the IMRT plans achieved a higher conformity index compared to the 3D-CRT plans (conformity index 0.79?±?0.12 vs. 0.54?±?0.19, p?=?0.012), the dose distribution across the target volumes was less homogeneous with IMRT planning than with 3D-CRT planning. This difference was statistically significant (homogeneity index 0.11?±?0.03 vs. 0.07?±?0.0, p?=?0.035). For the bowel, D_mean and D_1%, as well as V₂ to V₆₀ were reduced in IMRT plans. For the bladder and the rectum, there was no significant difference in D_mean. However, the percentages of volumes receiving at least doses of 30, 40, 45, and 50 Gy (V₃₀ to V₅₀) were lower for the rectum in IMRT plans. The volume of normal tissue receiving at least 2 Gy (V₂) was significantly higher in IMRT plans compared with 3D-CRT, whereas at high dose levels (V₃₀) it was significantly lower.

Conclusion

Compared to 3D-CRT, IMRT showed significantly better results regarding dose conformity (p?=?0.012) and bowel sparing at dose levels above 30 Gy (p?=?0.012). Thus, dose escalation in the radiotherapy of pelvic Ewing’s sarcoma can be more easily achieved using IMRT.