Comparison of diagnostic performance of three real-time PCR kits for detecting Mycobacterium species

Purpose

PCR is widely used for rapidly and accurately detecting Mycobacterium Species. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of three real-time PCR kits and evaluate the concordance with two older PCR methods.

Materials and Methods

Using 128 samples, the five PCR methods were assessed, including an in-house PCR protocol, the COBAS Amplicor MTB, the COBAS TaqMan MTB, the AdvanSure TB/NTM real-time PCR, and the Real-Q M. tuberculosis kit. The discrepant results were further examined by DNA sequencing and using the AdvanSure Mycobacteria Genotyping Chip for complete analysis.

Results

For Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) detection, all five kits showed 100% matching results (positive; N = 11 and negative; N = 80). In non-tuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) discrimination, the AdvanSure yielded two true-positive outcomes from M. intracellulare and one false positive outcome, while the Real-Q resulted in one true-positive outcome and one false negative outcome for each case and another false negative result using the provided DNA samples.

Conclusion

Real-time PCR, yielded results that were comparable to those of the older PCR methods for detecting MTB. However, there were disagreements among the applied kits in regard to the sample test results for detecting NTM. Therefore, we recommend that additional confirmatory measures such as DNA sequencing should be implemented in such cases, and further research with using a larger numbers of samples is warranted to improve the detection of NTM.     

Clinical Evaluation of the Automated COBAS AMPLICOR MTB Assay for Testing Respiratory and Nonrespiratory Specimens

We evaluated the COBAS AMPLICOR PCR system (Roche Diagnostics) for the routine detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) in clinical specimens. Diagnostic culture, considered as the reference method, was performed with BACTEC, Löwenstein-Jensen, Stonebrink, and Kirchner media. Occasionally MB-Redox, ESP, or MGIT medium was also used. A total of 643 respiratory and 506 nonrespiratory specimens collected from 807 patients were investigated. Of the 95 culture-positive specimens, 80 were COBAS AMPLICOR MTB positive, and of the 1,054 culture-negative specimens, 1,044 were COBAS AMPLICOR MTB negative. After resolving discrepancies by review of the medical history, the overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the COBAS AMPLICOR MTB assay, respectively, were 83.5, 98.8, 86.7, and 98.6% compared to those of diagnostic culture. In smear-positive specimens, the sensitivity of the COBAS AMPLICOR MTB assay was 96%, versus 48% for smear-negative specimens. No significant differences in the test performance between respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens were observed. The overall inhibition rate was less than 2%, excluding stool specimens. The clear advantages of the COBAS AMPLICOR PCR system are standardized procedures and reagents for specimen processing as well as an internal control for reliable monitoring of PCR inhibitors. By simplifying the work flow through a completely automated amplification and amplicon detection procedure, the COBAS AMPLICOR PCR system proved itself as a very useful component for routine diagnostic procedures.     

Evaluation of the ReSSQ assay in relation to the COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR test and an in-house nested PCR method for detection of cytomegalovirus DNA

The ReSSQ CMV assay is a novel commercially available kit for quantification of cytomegalovirus (CMV), based on real-time PCR with a peptide nucleic acid probe coupled with a single dye. In combination with the LightCycler, the ReSSQ CMV assay was evaluated with respect to specificity, PCR inhibition, linearity, reproducibility, and sensitivity. All nontested CMV materials were negative, and the assay was not inhibited by the use of different anticoagulants or other factors that may influence blood samples. The dynamic range was between 10 and 5 x 10(8) copies/PCR, and intra- and interassay variabilities were below 0.10 and 0.12 log10 standard deviations, respectively. Assay sensitivity was validated by analysis of 24 samples from a proficiency panel and by comparison to a nested in-house CMV PCR and the COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR test, using 159 clinical samples. Results from the proficiency panel were well in accordance with input values over the entire range of viral concentrations tested (50 to 31,250 copies/ml). The association between the ReSSQ CMV assay and the in-house PCR was in agreement in 90% of the clinical samples, and discordant results were found for all types of sample materials analyzed. The ReSSQ CMV and COBAS AMPLICOR assays showed no significant differences for samples containing >1,000 CMV copies/ml, but results differed to a greater extent at lower viral concentrations. The results demonstrate that the ReSSQ CMV assay is a CMV-specific, robust, and reproducible method and hence is well suited for routine use in clinical virology laboratories.     

Comparison of Gen-probe transcription-mediated amplification, Abbott PCR, and Roche PCR assays for detection of wild-type and mutant plasmid strains of Chlamydia trachomatis in Sweden

The clinical performance of two nucleic acid amplification assays targeting the cryptic plasmid and two assays targeting rRNA molecules in Chlamydia trachomatis was examined. First-catch urine samples from Malmoe, Sweden, were tested for C. trachomatis with the Abbott real-time PCR assay m2000 and an in-house PCR for the new variant strain of C. trachomatis with a deletion in the cryptic plasmid. Aliquots of the urine samples were sent to Aarhus, Denmark, and further examined with the Roche COBAS Amplicor CT (RCA) PCR, the Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 assay (AC2) targeting the C. trachomatis 23S rRNA, and the Aptima C. trachomatis assay (ACT) targeting the 16S rRNA molecule. A positive prevalence of 9% (163/1,808 urine samples examined) was detected according to the combined reference standard. The clinical sensitivity and specificity of the four assays were as follows: for ACT, 100% (163/163) and 99.9% (1,643/1,645), respectively; for AC2, 100% (163/163) and 99.6% (1,640/1,645); for m2000, 68.7% (112/163) and 99.9% (1,644/1,645); for RCA, 63.8% (104/163) and 99.9% (1,643/1,645). The two Gen-Probe assays detected all mutant strains characterized by the in-house PCR as having the deletion in the cryptic plasmid, whereas the Roche and the Abbott PCRs targeting the plasmid were both unable to detect the plasmid mutant. The difference in clinical sensitivity between the plasmid PCR assays m2000 and RCA, on the one hand, and the rRNA assays AC2 and ACT, on the other, could be attributed almost exclusively to the presence of the plasmid mutant in about one-quarter of the Chlamydia-positive samples examined.     

Evaluation of the automated COBAS AMPLICOR hepatitis C virus PCR system.

To evaluate the reliability and feasibility of the automated Roche COBAS AMPLICOR PCR system for routine detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA, a total of 405 serum samples previously tested by an in-house nested PCR and manual Roche AMPLICOR microwell plate HCV test were examined. Complete concordance was found between the results with the HCV COBAS AMPLICOR system and the previously determined HCV RNA status. The automated HCV COBAS AMPLICOR system provides the clinical microbiology laboratory with a specific and sensitive PCR method for rapid and reliable detection of HCV RNA.     

Evaluation of the COBAS AMPLICOR MTB system.

A panel of 1,012 respiratory sediments was retrospectively tested by PCR amplification to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis with the COBAS AMPLICOR MTB system. The sensitivities and specificities of COBAS and fluorescence microscopy compared to culture were 92.6 versus 95.6% and 99.6 versus 95.3%, respectively. Inhibition occurred in 48 (4.7%) specimens.     

Detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in human specimens by LightCycler PCR

Detection of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in clinical specimens is considered a cornerstone in the diagnosis of CMV disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate a newly designed LightCycler-based quantitative CMV PCR. Specimens of human origin (n = 200) were tested using the LightCycler PCR, the quantitative COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR (CACM) assay, and a qualitative in-house PCR assay for the presence of CMV DNA. Samples that were reactive in at least two of the three assays were considered CMV DNA positive (n = 95 [47. 5%]), while samples that were nonreactive in two of the three assays were considered CMV DNA negative (n = 105 [52.5%]). Using the LightCycler assay, CMV DNA was detected in 91 of the 95 CMV DNA-positive human specimens (sensitivity, 95.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 89.6 to 98.8) and in 1 of the CMV DNA-negative specimens (specificity, 99%; 95% CI, 94.8 to 99.8). Results of CMV load determination as assessed by both quantitative test systems were correlated (r = 0.73; P < 0.0001; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.81). Results for undiluted samples containing a high CMV load were more accurate with the LightCycler test than were results obtained with the CACM test, which underestimated the viral load of samples containing high DNA copy numbers. The high level of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and rapidity provided by the LightCycler technology are favorable for the use of this system in the detection of CMV DNA in clinical specimens.     

HCMV DNA detection and quantitation in the plasma and PBL of lung transplant recipients: COBAS Amplicor HCMV monitor test versus in-house quantitative HCMV PCR.

BACKGROUND: Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) reactivation may cause severe disease in immunosuppressed patients. Quantitation of HCMV viral load in the blood has been shown to be important in predicting for HCMV disease, however the particular blood compartment that should be tested, plasma versus peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL), has been subject to debate. OBJECTIVES: To simultaneously compare HCMV viral loads in the PBL using an in-house quantitative HCMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay and in the plasma using the commercially available COBAS Amplicor HCMV monitor test, in a cohort of lung transplant recipients (LTR). STUDY DESIGN: Sequential paired plasma and PBL samples were collected (n=98) from a total of 21 LTR during the first 6 months post lung transplantation. HCMV viral loads were assessed in the PBL using an in-house quantitative HCMV PCR assay and the plasma using the COBAS Amplicor HCMV monitor test. HCMV disease in LTR was defined as histopathologically proven HCMV pneumonitis. RESULTS: HCMV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was detected in 39/98 (40%) of total samples with excellent agreement between the two strategies. HCMV was detected in both the plasma and PBL in 38/39 (97%) of HCMV positive samples. HCMV viral loads were higher in patients with HCMV pneumonitis in both the PBL and plasma compared to patients without HCMV pneumonitis. Greater than 10-fold increases in HCMV DNA levels had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 73% in the plasma for HCMV pneumonitis and a positive and negative predictive value of 70 and 89%, respectively. Greater that 10-fold increases in HCMV DNA levels in the PBL had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 64%, for HCMV pneumonitis and a positive and negative predictive value of 64 and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Acknowledging the difference in assay methods used for HCMV DNA quantitation, the in-house PCR PBL assay and the COBAS Amplicor HCMV monitor plasma assay predicted equally well for HCMV pneumonitis in LTR.     

Performances of Four Real-Time PCR Assays for Diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia

Pneumonia due to Pneumocystis jirovecii (PCP) is a frequent infection among HIV-positive or other immunocompromised patients. In the past several years, PCR on pulmonary samples has become an essential element for the laboratory diagnosis of PCP. Nevertheless, very few comparative studies of available PCR assays have been published. In this work, we evaluated the concordance between four real-time PCR assays, including three commercial kits, AmpliSens, MycAssay, and Bio-Evolution PCR, and an in-house PCR (J. Fillaux et al. 2008, J Microbiol Methods 75:258–261, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2008.06.009), on 148 pulmonary samples. The results showed concordance rates ranging from 81.6% to 96.6% (kappa, 0.64 to 0.93). Concordance was excellent between three assays: the in-house assay, AmpliSens, and the MycAssay PCR (kappa, >0.8). The performances of these PCR assays were also evaluated according to the classification of the probability of PCP (proven, probable, possible, or no final diagnosis of PCP) based on clinical and radiological signs as well as on the direct examination of bronchoalveolar lavage samples. In the proven PCP category, Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA was detected with all four assays. In the probable PCP category, the in-house PCR, AmpliSens, and the MycAssay PCR were positive for all samples, while the Bio-Evolution PCR failed to detect Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA in two samples. In the possible PCP category, the percentage of positive samples according to PCR varied from 54.5% to 86.4%. Detection of colonized patients is discussed. Finally, among the four evaluated PCR assays, one was not suitable for colonization detection but showed good performance in the proven and probable PCP groups. For the three other assays, performances were excellent and allowed detection of a very low fungal burden.     

Comparative evaluation of the automated Roche TaqMan real-time quantitative human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA PCR assay and the Roche AMPLICOR Version 1.5 conventional PCR assay

The need to evaluate antiviral treatment response and the emergence of resistance have made the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viral load assay a major feature of the diagnostic monitoring of HIV-infected individuals. The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of the recently In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Directive-approved Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/TaqMan96 real-time PCR assay by comparison with the existing Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/AMPLICOR MONITOR conventional PCR assay. EDTA-treated plasma samples from 191 HIV-1-infected individuals were tested for HIV-1 RNA by the AMPLICOR assay and the TaqMan assay. This was a prospective study using 191 pairs of samples from the same bleed per patient. The correlation coefficient of the assays was 98.08%. The mean difference between the assays was 0.05 log(10) copy/ml plasma, with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.27 log(10) copy/ml plasma. Thirteen samples gave results with variances greater than 0.5 log(10) copy/ml plasma, which is our clinical cutoff. Two samples were more than 3 SD different (0.81 log(10) copy/ml plasma). The TaqMan assay appeared to be slightly more sensitive at the lower end of the dynamic range. The assays correlated significantly (P > 0.95) with each other, and the regression analysis was also highly significant (R(2) > 0.95).     

Evaluation of a novel internally controlled real-time PCR assay targeting the 16S rRNA gene for confirmation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections.

A novel HybProbe real-time LightCycler PCR assay was developed for confirmation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in samples positive according to the COBAS AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis/Neisseria gonorrhoeae PCR assay. The new assay amplifies 375 bp of the N. gonorrhoeae 16S rRNA gene and includes an internal amplification control introduced during DNA purification. The assay had 100% specificity because of the high specificity of the HybProbes and primers. Other Neisseria spp. failed to generate positive crossing-point values and melting peaks. The analytical sensitivity for N. gonorrhoeae DNA was 0.5 fg/PCR, corresponding to 0.3 CFU/PCR. Sensitivity was not impaired in the presence of higher DNA concentrations (>or=1000-fold) from Neisseria spp. other than N. gonorrhoeae. The sensitivity was similar to that reported for the COBAS AMPLICOR assay with cervical swab samples. To assess its clinical applicability as a confirmatory test, 38 (2.9%) of 1313 swabs that were positive according to the COBAS AMPLICOR assay were tested using the new in-house assay and the commercially available GenFlow Neisseria test. Twenty-one samples negative according to COBAS AMPLICOR also underwent confirmatory testing. Both confirmatory tests yielded identical results; the 21 negative samples remained negative, and only 11 (28.9%) of the samples positive according to COBAS AMPLICOR were positive after retesting, suggesting a low prevalence (0.84%) of N. gonorrhoeae infection in the study population. These data suggest that the novel real-time PCR assay is an excellent and easy to interpret confirmatory test for the existing COBAS AMPLICOR assay for N. gonorrhoeae.     

Confirmation by 16S rRNA PCR of the COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test for diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in a low-prevalence population

The COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test is widely used for the diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection using genital swabs or urine samples. Although highly specific, cross-reactivity occurs with some nonpathogenic strains of Neisseria and Lactobacillus species. In low-prevalence populations, even highly specific assays may require confirmatory testing of positive results. We assessed the positive predictive value (PPV) of this test in a low-prevalence (0.5%) setting. Genital and urine specimens testing positive using the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test were retested using an investigational 16S rRNA PCR assay. Additionally, 737 specimens were tested in parallel by both culture and the above PCR protocol. Of 9,772 specimens tested in-house, 168 were positive by the AMPLICOR test; in addition, 62 AMPLICOR-positive specimens were referred to our laboratory for confirmatory testing, yielding 230 positive specimens. Of these, 72 were confirmed positive by 16S rRNA PCR, yielding a specificity of 98.7% and a PPV of 31.3%. Specificity was similar for all specimen types, whereas PPV varied with prevalence: specimens from males, females, urine specimens, and genital swabs had PPVs of 70.8, 13.3, 51.9, and 20.1%, respectively. The PPV was higher when the initial AMPLICOR optical density (OD) was ≥3.5 versus initial and repeat OD readings in an equivocal zone of ≥0.2 to <3.5 (65.1 versus 10.1%; P < 0.001). On repeat testing of specimens with ODs in the equivocal zone, 54 gave ODs of ≥0.2 and <2.0, 35 gave ODs of ≥2.0 and <3.5, and 12 gave ODs of ≥3.5, with 3.7, 20, and 33.3% confirmed positive, respectively (P = 0.004). Comparing PCR to culture as the “gold standard,” specificity increased from 96.8 to 99.9% when 16S rRNA PCR was performed on specimens positive by the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test. Confirmatory testing with a more specific method such as 16S rRNA PCR should be considered in low-prevalence populations, especially for specimens with an OD in the equivocal zone.     

Comparison of COBAS 4800 KRAS, TaqMan PCR and High Resolution Melting PCR assays for the detection of KRAS somatic mutations in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded colorectal carcinomas

Many studies documented the influence of KRAS mutation status on the response of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. The COBAS 4800 KRAS is an assay using real time PCR and TaqMelt technology, CE-IVD validated, for the detection of 19 KRAS somatic mutations in exons 2 and 3. We compared COBAS with previously validated PCR TaqMan and High Resolution Melting (HRM) assays on 156 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) specimens of colorectal carcinoma. DNA extraction procedures, using the Qiagen QiAMP kit and the Roche COBAS DNA kit, were also compared. Of the 156 samples, 132 were interpretable using COBAS and TaqMan and 92 using COBAS and HRM. No statistically significant difference was found between COBAS/TaqMan and COBAS/HRM (k?=?0.937; p?<?0.001 — four discordant cases were found, mostly concerning codon 61 mutations and k?=?0.891; p?<?0.001 — five discordant cases were found, three regarding codon 61 and two on codon 12/13, respectively). No difference was found between the two DNA extraction methods (t?=?1.7185; dol?=?39; α?=?5 %). The three assays were found suitable to detect accurately KRAS mutations in colon FFPE specimens. COBAS and TaqMan were found to be more robust than HRM, as they yielded fewer non-interpretable results. DNA extraction kits were found to provide equivalent results. The present study shows that pre-screening using COBAS with further TaqMan mutation characterization constitutes an easy and reliable approach for routine diagnostic purposes     

Comparison of the Xpert MTB/RIF test with an IS6110-TaqMan real-time PCR assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens

The sensitivities of the Xpert MTB/RIF test and an in-house IS6110-based real-time PCR using TaqMan probes (IS6110-TaqMan assay) for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) DNA were compared by use of 117 clinical specimens (97 culture positive and 20 culture negative for MTBC) that were frozen in sediment. The 97 clinical specimens included 60 respiratory and 37 nonrespiratory specimens distributed into 36 smear-positive and 61 smear-negative specimens. Among the 97 culture-positive specimens, 4 had rifampin-resistant isolates. Both methods were highly specific and exhibited excellent sensitivity (100%) with smear-positive specimens. The sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF test with the whole smear-negative specimens was more reduced than that of the IS6110-TaqMan assay (48 versus 69%, P = 0.005). Both methods exhibited similar sensitivities with smear-negative respiratory specimens, but the Xpert MTB/RIF test had lower sensitivity with smear-negative nonrespiratory specimens than the IS6110-TaqMan assay (37 versus 71%, P = 0.013). Finally, the sensitivities of the Xpert MTB/RIF test and the IS6110-TaqMan assay were 79% and 84%, respectively, with respiratory specimens and 53% and 78%, respectively (P = 0.013), with nonrespiratory specimens. The Xpert MTB/RIF test correctly detected the rifampin resistance in smear-positive specimens but not in the one smear-negative specimen. The Xpert MTB/RIF test is a simple rapid method well adapted to a routine laboratory that appeared to be as sensitive as the IS6110-TaqMan assay with respiratory specimens but less sensitive with paucibacillary specimens, such as smear-negative nonrespiratory specimens.     

Comparison of a duplex quantitative real-time PCR assay and the COBAS Amplicor CMV Monitor test for detection of cytomegalovirus

A duplex quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assay was designed to detect both the polymerase gene (pol) and the glycoprotein gene (gB) of cytomegalovirus (CMV). The detection limit of the qPCR was determined to be 1 to 3 copies/reaction and the linear measure interval was 10(3) to 10(8) copies/ml. The qPCR system was compared to the COBAS Amplicor CMV Monitor test (COBAS) by an analysis of 138 plasma samples. Both systems detected CMV in 71 cases and had negative results for 33 samples. In addition, 34 samples were positive by qPCR and negative by the COBAS assay, but in no case was the COBAS result positive and the qPCR result negative. Thus, qPCR detected 48% more positive cases than the COBAS method. For samples with > or = 10(5) copies/ml by qPCR, a saturation effect was seen in the COBAS assay and quantification required dilution. Copy numbers for pol and gB by qPCR generally agreed. However, the reproducibility of qPCR assays and the need for an international standard are discussed. Discrepant copy numbers for pol and gB by qPCR were found for samples from two patients, and sequence analysis revealed that the corresponding CMV strains were mismatched at four nucleotide positions compared with the gB fragment primer sequences. In conclusion, a duplex qPCR assay in a real-time format facilitates quantitative measurements and minimizes the risk of false-negative results.     

Detection and quantitation of HCV RNA using real-time PCR after automated sample processing

There is considerable evidence that the loss of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA during the first 3 months of treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin is a prognostic marker of response to therapy. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for quantifying HCV RNA in plasma or serum are now commercially available. The extraction of HCV RNA can also be automated. This report analyses the performance of the COBAS Ampliprep-COBAS Taqman 48 (CAP/CTM) real-time PCR assay and compares this new test with the COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor v 2.0 assay (CAM). CAP/CTM was 100% specific. The assay was linear across a wide range of HCV RNA concentrations without sample dilution. The intra-assay variation was 0.3-3.3% and the interassay variation was 1.5-6.7%. A total of 118 clinical samples with different HCV genotypes were assayed using both methods. The results obtained using the two methods were well correlated (r = 0.89, P < 0.001). The mean difference [CAP/CTM-CAM] was 0.17 log IU/ml and it was not influenced by the HCV genotype or by the subtype. It is concluded that the new CAP/CTM system is adequate for quantifying HCV RNA in clinical practice.     

Multicentric evaluation of a new commercial cytomegalovirus real-time PCR quantitation assay

Automated real-time PCR systems have become the most common method in the quantitation of viral load during cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in immuno-compromised patients. In order to evaluate a new commercially available CMV real-time PCR assay (CMV R-gene, Argene, France), a pp65 antigenemia assay and four different "in-house" real-time PCR assays were compared to the CMV R-gene for the detection and the quantitation of CMV load in 506 specimens of whole blood from transplant patients in four French hospital laboratories. The CMV R-gene was more sensitive than the pp65 antigenemia: there were 18% antigenemia-negative versus CMV R-gene-positive samples. A significant correlation was found between DNA quantitation by CMV R-gene and the number of positive cells detected by the pp65 antigenemia test (Spearman's rank test, r=0.63, p<0.0001). A CMV DNA load equivalent to 50 pp65-positive cells/200000 polymorphonuclear leukocytes was 5.26log(10)copies/mL of whole blood. When the CMV R-gene kit was compared to the four other "in-house" real-time PCR assays, there were few discordant results (6.7% total for the four laboratories), all detected with a weak positive CMV DNA viral load. Spearman's coefficients showed a good (r=0.82 for laboratory 1, r=0.66 for laboratory 3) to excellent (r=0.99 for laboratory 2, r=0.94 for laboratory 4) correlation between CMV R-gene and the four real-time "in-house" PCR assays. However, the results of CMV DNA viral load generated by CMV R-gene test were constantly higher than those generated by three out of four "in-house" PCR assays. This mean variation in CMV DNA viral load measured by CMV R-gene and "in-house" PCRs was of 0.77log(10), 0.04log(10), 0.77log(10) and 0.97log(10), for laboratories 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. We concluded that there was variability between results of different real-time PCR assays for CMV DNA quantitation. This observation emphasized the need of a standardised commercial assay to allow an "inter-laboratory" comparison of results. Our study showed that CMV R-gene is an accurate, efficient, reliable and versatile tool for rapid diagnosis and monitoring of CMV disease in transplantation recipients.     

Comparison of quantitative and qualitative PCR assays for cytomegalovirus DNA in plasma

We analyzed the performance characteristics of the qualitative AMPLICOR CMV Test (Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, Calif.) and quantitative COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR Test (Roche Molecular Systems) assays and compared the performance of the AMPLICOR quantitative assay with an in-house-developed cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA PCR assay. The quantitative AMPLICOR assay was found to be more sensitive than the qualitative AMPLICOR assay. The quantitative AMPLICOR assay has a lower limit of sensitivity of 400 CMV DNA copies/ml of plasma and is linear to 50,000 CMV DNA copies/ml of plasma. Compared to the in-house PCR assay, the AMPLICOR quantitative assay gave lower viral load values at all concentrations tested, but the difference between the two assays was not consistent across the entire dynamic range of the AMPLICOR quantitative assay. At the lower end of the assay, the viral load values obtained with the in-house PCR assay were three- to fivefold (0.5 to 0.7 log units) higher than those measured with the AMPLICOR assay. At higher input concentrations, the differences between the two assays approached 10-fold. This direct comparison of the in-house assay and the quantitative AMPLICOR assay provides the ability to compare previously published in-house data with an assay widely available for future research and clinical monitoring of patients with CMV infections.     

Rapid detection of herpes simplex virus and varicella-zoster virus infections by real-time PCR

The herpes simplex viruses types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) can cause life-threatening infections of the central nervous system and lead to severe infections in immunocompromised subjects and newborns. In these cases, rapid diagnosis is crucial. We developed three different real-time PCR assays based on TaqMan chemistry for the LightCycler instrument to detect HSV-1, HSV-2, and VZV. When the TaqMan assays were compared to our in-house nested PCR assays, the test systems had equal sensitivities of 相似文献   

Quantitative analysis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia using the pp65 antigenemia assay and the COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR PCR test after blood and marrow allogeneic transplantation

The performance of a commercially available qualitative PCR test for plasma (AMPLICOR CMV Test; Roche Diagnostics) and a quantitative PCR test for plasma and leukocytes (COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR Test; Roche Diagnostics) was evaluated with samples from 50 blood or marrow allogeneic transplant recipients who received short courses of sequential ganciclovir therapy (2 weeks intravenously followed by 2 weeks orally) based on a positive cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 antigenemia (AG) assay. The number of persons with a positive CMV test was significantly higher for leukocyte-based assays (AG, 67.5%; PCR, 62.5%) compared to both quantitative and qualitative PCR tests of plasma (42.5 and 35%, respectively). One person developed CMV disease during the study despite a negative AG assay; in this particular case, all PCR assays were found to be positive 10 days before his death. There was a trend for earlier positivity after transplantation and more rapid negativity after initiation of ganciclovir for the tests performed on leukocytes. The mean number of CMV copies as assessed by PCR was significantly higher in leukocytes than in plasma (P = 0.02). Overall, excellent agreement (kappa coefficient, >0.75) was found only between the two PCR assays (qualitative and quantitative) based on plasma. These results suggest that either the pp65 AG assay or the COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR Test using leukocytes could be used to safely monitor CMV viremia in related allogeneic blood or marrow transplant recipients. Such a strategy will result in preemptive treatment for about two-thirds of the persons with a relatively low rate (<33%) of secondary viremic episodes following short courses of ganciclovir therapy.