Echo-endoscopy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: the influence of the size of the stone and diameter of the common bile duct

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is highly accurate in diagnosing choledocholithiasis, but it is the most invasive of the available methods. Endoscopic ultrasonography is a very accurate test for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis with a risk of complications similar to that of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. AIM: To compare the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to analyze endoscopic ultrasound results according to stone size and common bile duct diameter. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and fifteen patients with symptomatic gallstones were admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Sixty-eight of them (31.7%) had a dilated common bile duct and/or hepatic biochemical parameter abnormalities. They were submitted to endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Sphincterotomy and sweeping of the common bile duct were performed if endoscopic ultrasonography or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography were considered positive for choledocholithiasis. After sphincterotomy and common bile duct clearance the largest stone was retrieved for measurement. Endoscopic or surgical explorations of the common bile duct were considered the gold-standard methods for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. RESULTS: All 68 patients were submitted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography with confirmation of the presence of gallstones. Endoscopic ultrasonography was a more sensitivity test than endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (97% vs. 67%) for the detection of choledocholithiasis. When stones >4.0 mm were analyzed, endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography presented similar results (96% vs. 90%). Neither the size of the stone nor the common bile duct diameter had influence on endoscopic ultrasonographic performance. CONCLUSIONS: For a group of patients with an intermediate or moderate risk with respect to the likelihood of having common bile duct stones, endoscopic ultrasonography is a better test for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis when compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography mainly for small-sized calculi.     

Non-invasive assessment of choledocholithiasis in patients with gallstones and abnormal liver function

AIM:To find a non-invasive strategy for detecting choledocholithiasis before cholecystectomy,with an acceptable negative rate of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.METHODS:All patients with symptomatic gallstones were included in the study.Patients with abnormal liver functions and common bile duct abnormalities on ultrasound were referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Patients with normal ultrasoundwere referred to magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.All those who had a negative magnetic resonance or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography.RESULTS:Seventy-eight point five percent of patients had laparoscopic cholecystectomy directly with no further investigations.Twenty-one point five percent had abnormal liver function tests,of which 52.8%had normal ultrasound results.This strategy avoided unnecessary magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in 47.2%of patients with abnormal liver function tests with a negative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography rate of 10%.It also avoided un-necessary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 35.2%of patients with abnormal liver function.CONCLUSION:This strategy reduces the cost of the routine use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography,in the diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Selection criteria for pre-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic-laparoscopic treatment of biliary stones.

OBJECTIVE: Pre-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the most common treatment of gallbladder and common bile duct (CBD) stones. In this study we evaluate our selection criteria for pre-operative ERCP and the results of endoscopic-laparoscopic treatment in patients with CBD stones. DESIGN: Consecutive adult patients admitted to the department of surgery because of symptomatic cholelithiasis were included in a prospective open trial. PARTICIPANTS: Between January 1996 and December 1996, 841 patients underwent LC at our hospital. ERCP pre-LC was performed in 95 of the 841 patients, on the basis of our selection criteria. INTERVENTIONS: The indication to perform ERCP was suggested by a dilatated CBD (> 10 mm) or ductal stones, abnormal serum liver tests, persisting for more than 3 days, jaundice, cholangitis or pancreatitis. Twelve months after surgery, all patients were contacted by telephone to exclude symptoms related to residual stones. RESULTS: Cannulation of the CBD was successful in 94 of 95 patients submitted to pre-LC ERCP. CBD stones were found in 87 patients (95.6%) in 22 of whom (25.2%) they were in the form of small stones or sludge. In only three of 94 patients (3.2%) no alterations of the CBD or papilla were found. Complications occurred in eight of 98 patients (in five after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), and in three after LC). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative ES in selected patients with coexisting gallbladder and CBD stones has been a good approach and the criteria that we used for selection of patients to be submitted to pre-operative ERCP/ES seem to be effective.     

Imaging of the common bile duct in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Options for managing the common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy include routine peroperative cholangiography and selected preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The use of these methods was reviewed in 350 patients with symptomatic gall stones referred for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Unit A (n = 114) performed routine cystic duct cholangiography but undertook preoperative ERCP in patients at very high risk of duct stones only; unit B (n = 236) performed selected preoperative ERCP on the basis of known risk factors for duct stones. The detection rate for common bile duct stones was similar for units A and B (16% v 20%). In unit A, five of seven patients who had preoperative ERCP had duct stones. Operative cholangiography was technically successful in 90% of patients and duct stones were confidently identified in 13, one of whom went on to immediate open duct exploration. Postoperative ERCP identified duct stones in only four patients, indicating spontaneous passage in eight. In unit B, preoperative ERCP was undertaken in 76 of 236 (32%) patients and duct stones were identified in 47 (20%). Duct clearance was successful in 42 (18%) but failed in five (2%), necessitating elective open duct exploration. Both protocols for imaging the common bile duct worked well and yielded satisfactory short term results.     

Sphincterotomy in patients with gallstones, elevated LFTs and a normal CBD on ERCP

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine whether an endoscopic sphincterotomy affects outcome in patients with symptomatic gallstones, elevated liver function tests and a normal common bile duct on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram. METHODOLOGY: A total of 163 patients with symptomatic gallstones and elevated liver function tests, and found to have a normal common bile duct on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram were included in the study. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed in 78 (47.8%) patients, while 85 (52.1%) patients did not have an endoscopic sphincterotomy. The two groups were compared for detection of small unseen common bile duct stones/debris, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram related complications, and biliary complications after cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Small common bile duct stones/debris were recovered in 11/43 (25.5%) patients who had instrumentation of the common bile duct performed after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Common bile duct instrumentation was not performed in any of the patients without endoscopic sphincterotomy. No patient had any biliary complication after cholecystectomy, both in the immediate postoperative period and on a follow-up of 37.5 +/- 13.6 months (range 17-66). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram related complications occurred in 8 patients who had an endoscopic sphincterotomy and in 2 without endoscopic sphincterotomy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Performing an endoscopic sphincterotomy in these patients increases the detection of small unseen common bile duct stones/debris without changing the clinical outcome after cholecystectomy. It also increases the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram related complication rate, and therefore may not be necessary.     

The role of serum liver enzymes in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has increased the need for preoperative diagnosis of common bile duct stones. The purpose of this study is to verify the sensitivity of the liver function tests in the detection of duct stones. METHODOLOGY: We evaluated 438 patients (223 retrospectively and 215 prospectively) who underwent endoscopic papillotomy for bile duct stones in two different services. In every case, blood samples for liver function tests levels were collected prior to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. RESULTS: The most sensitive test was gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, that was abnormal in 92.2% of the cases. Alkaline phosphatase was elevated in 74.7% of the patients with choledocholithiasis. The least sensitive parameter was AST, altered in only 50.8% of times. The sensitivity of all liver tests for the diagnosis of choledochal stones taken together was 94.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Liver function tests are very sensitive in the detection of common bile duct stones, however these blood tests are in the normal range of about 5% of endoscopically treated patients.     

Diagnostic workup before laparoscopic cholecystectomy--which diagnostic tools should be used?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A prerequisite for successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the exclusion of potential risks such as cholangiolithiasis, anatomical malformations or diseases of the stomach. As there is no general agreement regarding the appropriate preoperative diagnostic workup, we compared different diagnostic methods as to their value in detecting unknown accompanying diseases and complications. METHODOLOGY: Between 9/90 and 8/93, we performed 850 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The first 700 were included in this study. A prospective comparison was carried out of the diagnostic accuracy of history, physical examination, laboratory tests, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy or barium meal, i.v. cholangiography and abdominal ultrasound. RESULTS: Measurement of the diameter of the common bile duct was found to be a good noninvasive method for diagnosing common bile duct stones (sensitivity 80%, specificity 99%). In combination with the history and the laboratory tests the sensitivity could be improved to 99%. The sensitivity of i.v. cholangiography in detecting common bile duct stones was 80%, the specificity 99.3%. 646/700 patients underwent preoperative endoscopy/barium meal. In 53 (8.2%) patients pathological findings were found, but only in 4 cases (0.6%) they influenced the indication for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In 1 patient an advanced gastric cancer was diagnosed 6 months after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the preoperative barium meal did not show any pathological findings. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that routine ultrasonography in combination with history and laboratory tests prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be recommended for detecting common bile duct stones. In patients with 1 or more pathologic finding endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography should be performed preoperatively. A gastroscopy should be done in patients with nonspecific upper abdominal pain, history of peptic ulcer disease and persisting pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Cystic Duct Stones Detected During Intraoperative Cholangiography in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

During intraoperative cholangiography, cystic duct stones were diagnosed in 79 of 898 consecutive patients (8.8%) who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy over a 45-month period. The stones were successfully removed laparoscopically. In addition, it should be mentioned that the stones were identified and retrieved before the cholangiography was started in all but 8 of the 79 cases. Of these 79, only 27 cases (34.2%) had been diagnosed as having cystic duct stones preoperatively by intravenous cholangiography and/or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. From the results obtained, it can be concluded that intraoperative cholangiography is mandatory to detect unsuspected retained stones not only in the common duct but also in the cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and also provides vital information as to biliary anatomic variations, the proximity of the cystic duct to the common duct, and the confirmation of inadvertent bile duct injury.     

Selective preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with sphincterotomy avoids bile duct exploration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

A policy of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) for suspected bile duct stones was used in 1507 patients considered for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in three district general hospitals. Altogether 306 patients underwent ERC, and bile duct cannulation was achieved in 276 (90%). Bile ducts were cleared by endoscopic sphincterotomy in 128 of 161 patients (79%) with proven duct stones. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was completed in 1396 patients. Ten laparotomies were necessary for complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The complication rate for endoscopic sphincterotomy/laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 2.7%, with no mortality. Overall, a combined endoscopic/laparoscopic approach succeeded in 1386 patients (92%). Fourteen patients (1%) had retained stones during a median of 14 months (range 1-42) follow up, all of which were removed by ERC/endoscopic sphincterotomy. If a policy of selective ERC before laparoscopic cholecystectomy is used for all patients with symptomatic gall stones, most will avoid an open operation and laparoscopic exploration of the bile duct is not necessary.     

Endoscopic management of a large choledochocele associated with choledocholithiasis

Choledochocele or type III choledochal cyst is a very rare lesion, defined as a cystic dilatation of the distal common bile duct protruding into the duodenal lumen. Abdominal pain, biliary disorders, and acute pancreatitis are frequently observed but malignant degeneration is rare. A 70-year-old man had a history of epigastralgia associated with abnormal liver function tests suggesting gallstones. During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, intraoperative cholangiography showed a 40-mm-diameter choledochocele associated with choledocholithiasis. A transcystic drain was placed after cholecystectomy had been completed. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography confirmed the diagnosis and a 45-mm-long endoscopic sphincterotomy successfully treated both lesions as confirmed by a transcystic cholangiogram showing a thin-walled common bile duct with no residual stones. This case illustrates that the diagnosis of choledochocele remains difficult in clinical practice and confirms that endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is the best available diagnostic tool. Coexistent choledocholithiasis is observed in about 20% of choledochocele. Endoscopic sphincterotomy is feasible and effectively treats both lesions even in larger choledochoceles.     

Rapid diagnosis of choledocholithiasis using biochemical tests in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The present study was designed to identify the biochemical tests which could detect the presence of common bile duct stones in patients with symptomatic gallstones, without other invasive investigations. The usefulness of biochemical tests may reduce the necessity of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODOLOGY: 3000 patients with symptomatic laparoscopic cholecystectomy scheduled for laparoscopic cholesystectomy were included in the study. 458 patients (201 men, 257 women; mean age, 57.7 +/- 14.6 yrs) were examined with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected common bile duct stones. The serum tests for liver function, including a measurement of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, gamma-glutamyltransferase and albumin were obtained on admission prior to the ultrasonography, and the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. RESULTS: The six significant factors, including alkaline phosphatase, direct bilirubin, total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyltransferase were identified by the univariate analysis and the multivariate logistic regression analysis which identified alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyltransferase, as the two significant independent factors. A statistical model was developed with a formula of [formula: see text] A curve of receiver operating characteristics was constructed to identify an alkaline phosphatase level greater than 300 U/L or a gamma-glutamyltransferase level greater than 420 mU/mL which would have both higher sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Biochemical tests can be a significant aid to the clinician's decision-making when predicting the presence of common bile duct stones in patients with gallstones.     

Selective use of perioperative ERCP in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Management of common bile duct stones in the era of laparoscopic surgery is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety, feasibility, success rate and short-term results of the selective use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODOLOGY: A prospective study comprising 300 consecutive patients with either symptomatic or complicated gallbladder stones was performed between January 1994 and November 1996. Depending on clinical, laboratory and ultrasonographic criteria, 73 patients (24.3%) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy. The procedure was successful in 71 patients (97%) either preoperatively in 62 patients (21%) or postoperatively in 9 patients (3%). RESULTS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was positive in 37 cases (52%), endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction was performed in 35 cases and endoscopic sphincterotomy alone was performed in 2 cases for benign papillary stenosis. The overall predictive value for the presence of common bile duct stone was 52%, the predictive value for patients with jaundice, dilated common bile duct together with elevated liver enzymes was 73.3%. Complications of perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were encountered in 4 patients (5.5%) with no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the combination of perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a useful approach for the management of choledochocholelithiasis.     

Utility of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Evaluation of Idiopathic Abdominal Pain

We investigated the role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 86 consecutive patients with idiopathic chronic or recurrent abdominal pain. There were 18 males and 68 females with a mean age of 48 yr. Forty patients (47%) had previous cholecystectomy. Patients were divided into two groups: group I (normal serum alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin) (n = 52), and group II (elevated serum alkaline phosphatase and/or total bilirubin) (n = 34). Panereatograms were normal in all patients, including five with pancreas divisum. Cholangiograms were abnormal in 10 of the 34 patients in group II (30%), and in only three of the 52 patients in group I (6%) ( p = 0.003). Bile duct stones were present in 18% of the patients in group II, and in none of the patients in group I ( p = 0.003). Of the 40 post-cholecystectomy patients, four patients had bile duct stones and five had common bile duct dilation without stones. However, no stones were found in any post-cholecystectomy patients with normal liver tests. Of the 46 patients with gallbladder in situ , two patients with abnormal liver tests had common bile duct stones and two patients had common bile duct dilation without stones. These results indicate that, among patients with idiopathic abdominal pain, cholangiography should be performed primarily in those with abnormal liver tests; however, further investigation with pancreatography is unnecessary.     

Introduction of a "Safety Zone" for the Safety of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Anatomic variations of the biliary tract were found in 18 cases of 600 patients (3.0%) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All bile duct anomalies were confirmed preoperatively by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. In every case, the cystic duct and cystic artery were exposed in a "safety zone" near the gallbladder neck in Calot's triangle. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successfully performed on all 18 cases. Intraoperative cholangiography clearly demonstrated the anatomic variations in all cases, unequivocally identified the cystic duct, and confirmed the absence of bile duct injury. Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and intraoperative cholangiography, which have been performed routinely in all patients, improve the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Moreover, the observance of the essential rule of "keep operating in the safety zone" protects against inadvertent complications, especially against bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was thus successfully performed on all 600 cases in the present series, except for three cases, which were converted to open surgery (conversion rates, 0.5%), because of pin-hole bleeding on the portal vein in our first case of 600, and severe adhesion in two (46th and 302nd) cases.     

Prospective evaluation of early endoscopic ultrasonography for triage in suspected choledocholithiasis: Results from a large single centre series

BackgroundEndoscopic ultrasonography is accurate, safe, and cost-effective in diagnosing common bile duct stones, thus suggesting the possibility to avoid invasive endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.AimTo prospectively evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic performance of early endoscopic ultrasonography in suspected choledocholithiasis.Patients and methodsAll consecutive patients presenting to the Emergency Department with suspicion of choledocholithiasis between January 2010 and January 2012 were evaluated and categorized as low, moderate, or high probability of choledocholithiasis, according to accepted criteria. Endoscopic endosonography was carried out within 48 h from the admission and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed soon in case of confirmed choledocholithiasis.ResultsOverall 179 patients were included: 48 (26.8%) were classified as low, 65 (36.3%) as moderate, and 66 (36.9%) as high probability of choledocholithiasis. Of the 86 patients with common bile duct stones at endoscopic endosonography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography confirmed the finding in 79 (92%). By multivariate analysis only the common bile duct diameter proved an independent predictor of common bile duct stones.ConclusionsEarly endoscopic endosonography is accurate in identifying choledocholithiasis allowing immediate endoscopic treatment and significant spare of unnecessary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. This approach can be useful as a triage test to select patients not needing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, allowing, in selected cases, their early discharge.     

Role of Preoperative Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Abstract: An endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) was performed in 303 patients before laparoscopic cholecystectory. The ERC was successful in 275 patients (90.8%). Common bile duct stones were diagnosed in 9 of 275 patients (3.3%). These had not been suspected on the basis of the clinical and laboratory data or ultrasonography results in 8 of them. An endoscopic papilotomy (EPT) was successful in all 9 patients with choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anatomical variations, such as origin of the cystic duct from the right or left hepatic duct and an accessory bile duct, were detected in 6 patients (2.2%). Preoperative ERC proved useful in determining the biliary anatomy or detecting unsuspected stones. (Dig Endosc 1994; 6 : 24–27)     

Diagnosis of common bile duct calculi with intraductal ultrasonography during endoscopic biliary cannulation

BACKGROUND: Choledocholithiasis can be difficult to diagnose, even with direct cholangiography. We examined the role of biliary intraductal ultrasonography in detecting common bile duct stones that had been overlooked during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. METHODS: Eighty consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for suspected choledocholithiasis with negative results were evaluated with intraductal ultrasonography (20 MHz) for the presence of biliary concrements. The diagnostic criterion for stones was a strong-echo structure with acoustic shadowing. Materials of low amplitude echoes without acoustic shadowing were considered sludge. RESULTS: Intrabile duct scanning was successful in all patients. Of the 80 patients, 20 (25%) had ultrasonic evidence of common bile duct stones. The stones measured 5 mm or less on ultrasound and their presence was confirmed macroscopically during endoscopic (17 patients) or laparoscopic (three patients) bile duct clearance. Another 37 patients (46%) had biliary sludge alone and have been followed up uneventfully. CONCLUSIONS: Biliary intraductal ultrasonography may become a useful adjunct to establish the diagnosis of occult bile duct concrements and a guide to appropriate therapeutic selection during endoscopic biliary cannulation.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: A single-stage minimally invasive procedure would be optimal for management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis. Two alternative strategies are available: management by laparoscopy alone or a combined laparoscopic-endoscopic approach. This study evaluates the results of the latter procedure. METHODS: From June 1993 to September 1997, 1400 patients with symptomatic biliary stone disease were evaluated for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intraoperative cholangiography was performed on the basis of a preoperative suspicion of bile duct stones; bile duct stone treatment was by intraoperative endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy. RESULTS: Intraoperative cholangiography was performed because of a preoperative suspicion of a bile duct abnormality in 141 of 1400 patients (10%) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy because of biliary stone disease. Of those 141 patients, 54 (38.3%) presented with pathologic findings (bile duct stone [52] and papillary stenosis [2]); all 54 underwent intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy. Complete clearance of the ductal stones was achieved in 43 patients (82.7%) by intraoperative sphincterotomy, and in 9 patients by an additional postoperative endoscopic procedure. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was carried out in all cases. There were no conversions to an open operation. Postoperative course in the uncomplicated cases was comparable to that for laparoscopic cholecystectomy alone. The postoperative complication rate was 5.6% and mortality 1.8%. Mean hospital stay was 3.3 days (range 2 to 16). At a mean 38 months follow-up, no complications related to the laparoscopic-endoscopic procedure were observed. CONCLUSION: The intraoperative combined laparoscopic-endoscopic approach seems to be a feasible and effective management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis, saving patients a subsequent invasive procedure.     

The case for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

The modern surgeon's approach to choledocholithiasis depends his or her view of cholangiography. During the early 1990 there was a swing away from cholangiography, which had previously been common practice. This was because of perceptions of difficulty with the technique, the time it took, and perhaps an implied increase in costs because of the time factor. There was no evidence on which to base this decision. This led to a marked upswing in the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). There were a large number of ERCPs with normal results performed prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This paper states the case for intraoperative cholangiography and common bile duct clearance at the time of cholecystectomy. It is hoped that this technique will be adopted so patients can undergo a single procedure to remove their gallstones and common bile duct stones if they exist and to decrease the incidence of normal preoperative ERCPs and the need for a second procedure postoperatively to clear stones if they are found.     

Double cystic duct detected by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and confirmed by intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case report

A case of double cystic duct with cholecystolithiasis detected by preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and confirmed by intraoperative cholangiography which was treated successfully by laparoscopic surgery is reported. The patient was a 74-year-old woman who complained of abdominal pain in the right upper quadrant. On admission, ultrasonography revealed hyperechoic areas accompanied by obscure acoustic shadows in the gallbladder. Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography showed 2 cystic ducts; 1 branched from the common bile duct and the other from the right hepatic duct. After a diagnosis of double cystic ducts, we chose laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intraoperative cholangiography via 1 of the cystic ducts revealed the presence of the other. We were able to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy without any complications and the postoperative course was uneventful. This case suggests that preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and intraoperative cholangiography is required to avoid complications during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.