Gastric Cancer Screening Uptake Trends in Korea: Results for the National Cancer Screening Program From 2002 to 2011: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study

Although the effectiveness of mass screening for gastric cancer remains controversial, several countries with a high prevalence of gastric cancer have implemented nationwide gastric cancer screening programs. This study was conducted to assess trends in the use of either upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) or endoscopy to screen for gastric cancer, as well as to assess factors strongly associated with changes therein, over a 10-year period.Data were obtained from the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) database from 2002 to 2011 in Korea. The NCSP provides biennial gastric cancer screening with either UGIS or endoscopy for men and women aged ≥40 years. Using the NCSP database, overall screening rates for gastric cancer and percentages of endoscopy use among participants were analyzed from 2002 to 2011. To estimate changes in participation rates and endoscopy use over time, we assessed the average annual percentage change (APC) by comparing the rates from 2002 and 2011 as relative rates.Participation rates for gastric cancer screening increased 4.33% annually from 2002 to 2011. In terms of screening method, a substantial increase in endoscopy use was noted among the gastric cancer screening participants over the 10-year period. The percentage of participants who had undergone endoscopy test increased from 31.15% in 2002 to 72.55% in 2011, whereas the percentage of participants who underwent UGIS decreased tremendously. Increased endoscopy test use was greatest among participants aged 40 to 49 (APC = 4.83%) and Medical Aid Program recipients (APC = 5.73%). Overall, men, participants of ages 40 to 49 years, and National Health Insurance beneficiaries of higher socioeconomic status were more likely to undergo screening via endoscopy.This study of nationwide empirical data from 2002 to 2011 showed that endoscopy is increasingly being used for gastric cancer screening in Korea, compared with UGIS. Nevertheless, further study of the impact of endoscopy on gastric cancer mortality is needed, and future evaluations of screening methods should take into account both cost and any associated reduction in gastric cancer mortality.     

The optimal age threshold for screening upper endoscopy for uninvestigated dyspepsia in Taiwan, an area with a higher prevalence of gastric cancer in young adults

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that 1% to 2% of patients with dyspepsia are associated with gastric cancer. To avoid missing gastric cancer, most guidelines recommend that patients over 45 years old should undergo EGD for uninvestigated dyspepsia. In Taiwan, however, the prevalence of gastric cancer in younger patients is higher than that of Western countries. The optimal age threshold for endoscopy in patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia in Taiwan remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to determine an optimal age threshold for screening endoscopy in patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia to avoid missing gastric cancer in Taiwan. METHODS: We reviewed the findings in all adult patients who underwent upper endoscopy because of uninvestigated dyspepsia at the National Taiwan University Hospital. In those patients with confirmed gastric cancer histology, further analysis was performed. Cumulative age frequency distributions for gastric cancer were calculated according to gender and to the presence or the absence of alarm features. The stages of gastric cancer also were analyzed according to the presence or the absence of alarm symptoms. RESULTS: During the 5-year period, a total of 17,894 patients received upper endoscopy caused by uninvestigated dyspepsia. Gastric cancer was found in 225 (12.6 cases per 1000 EGDs) patients who presented with uninvestigated dyspepsia, 135 men and 90 women. Thirty-one (13.7%) and 17 (7.6%) patients were aged less than 45 and 40 years old, respectively. Among these 225 patients with gastric cancer, 114 (50.7%) patients did not have alarm symptoms (simple dyspepsia), whereas 111 (49.3%) had alarm symptoms. About 5.3% (12/225) of gastric cancer cases would have been missed if endoscopy had been omitted in patients without alarm symptoms and aged less than 45 years. The cumulative age relative frequencies of patients with gastric cancer who presented with simple dyspepsia were 1.8 (12/6720), 1.02 (5/4920), and 0.59 (2/3411) cases per 1000 EGDs for uninvestigated dyspepsia in patients aged less than 45, 40, and 35 years, respectively. When the frequencies of gastric cancer were stratified by age and gender, we found a trend of male predominance in older patients but not in younger patients. The cutoff age was 60 years old ( p < 0.05). Early gastric cancer was detected in 9.9% (11/111) and 26.3% (30/114) of patients with and without alarm symptoms, respectively (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Gastric cancer is not uncommon in patients with dyspepsia aged less than 45 years in Taiwan. The age threshold of screening endoscopy for uninvestigated dyspepsia should be the same for both genders in view of comparable frequencies of gastric cancer in a young age population. Because more than 5% of gastric cancer cases would be missed in Taiwan if endoscopy was omitted in simple dyspeptic patients who were aged less than 45 years, we recommend that 40 years old might be an optimal age threshold for screening endoscopy for uninvestigated dyspepsia in Taiwan, in both men and women patients.     

The yield of lower endoscopy in patients with constipation: survey of a university hospital,a public county hospital,and a Veterans Administration medical center

BACKGROUND: The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of constipation is controversial. The aim of this study was to clarify the yield of lower endoscopy in patients with constipation. METHODS: Endoscopic databases from 3 diverse hospitals were searched for procedures with constipation as an indication. Detection of neoplasia was the main outcome of interest. RESULTS: Among 19,764 sigmoidoscopies or colonoscopies, constipation was a procedure indication for 563 patients (mean age 61 [16] years, 52% women); 58% had procedure indications in addition to constipation. Colorectal cancer was diagnosed in 8 (1.4%), adenomas in 82 (14.6%), and advanced lesions (cancer or adenoma with malignancy, high-grade dysplasia, villous features, or size > or = 10 mm) in 24 (4.3%). In the 358 patients who underwent colonoscopy, cancer was detected in 1.7%, adenomas in 19.6%, and advanced lesions in 5.9%. Two patients with cancer were less than 50 years of age. In as many as 6 patients with cancer, the tumor may have caused partial obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The range of neoplasia in patients with constipation evaluated with lower endoscopy was comparable with what would be expected in asymptomatic subjects undergoing colorectal cancer screening. Although chronic constipation alone may not be an appropriate indication for lower endoscopy, age-appropriate colorectal cancer screening should be pursued when patients with constipation seek medical care.     

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: diagnosis and management.

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is a familial cancer syndrome defined by germline mutation of the E-cadherin gene (CDH-1). The cumulative risk for advanced gastric cancer in HDGC is 67% in men and 83% in women by 80 years of age. Early HDGC is characterized by multiple microscopic foci of intramucosal signet-ring cell carcinoma. The time to progression of these foci appears to be variable and currently is not predictable--the carcinoma foci may remain confined to the mucosa for many years. The management options for mutation carriers include prophylactic gastrectomy or surveillance gastroscopy. The only extensive published surveillance experience used chromogastroscopy, which detected early HDGC foci not visible on white-light endoscopy. The use of new techniques such as confocal microscopy, spectroscopy, or autofluorescence may prove useful, but have not been studied in HDGC. In patients up to 20 years of age, the risk for gastric cancer is less than 1%; this risk is outweighed by the mortality and morbidity associated with total gastrectomy. It is therefore recommended that genetic testing should occur at 16 years of age and that annual surveillance chromogastroscopy also should begin at age 16 in identified CDH-1 mutation carriers. After 20 years of age, delaying prophylactic gastrectomy carries significant risk, particularly if the alternative is surveillance by white-light gastroscopy. Surveillance chromogastroscopy (Congo red/methylene blue technique) should be considered for individuals younger than 20 years and patients unwilling to undergo prophylactic gastrectomy. Sufficient evidence for an increased risk for lobular breast cancer in CDH-1 carriers exists to justify breast screening in female carriers older than 35 years of age, however, evidence is insufficient to recommend prophylactic mastectomy.     

Screening for high-grade dysplasia in gastroesophageal reflux disease: is it cost-effective?

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) to rule out high-grade dysplasia of Barrett's esophagus. METHODS: Using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio as outcome measure, the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening was compared to not screening in a decision tree. It was assumed that GERD patients at age 60 yr undergo a one-time endoscopy with esophageal biopsies, targeting abnormal-appearing epithelium. Positive biopsies with respect to high-grade dysplasia or early esophageal adenocarcinoma result in esophagectomy. Transition rates were estimated from U.S. cancer statistics, as well as published data of endoscopic sensitivity, specificity, and surgical outcome. Costs of screening and cancer care were estimated from Medicare reimbursement data from the perspective of a third-party-payor. RESULTS: Compared with no screening, screening endoscopy cost $24,700 per life-year saved. The cost-effectiveness of screening is quite sensitive to the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus, high-grade dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma, as well as the sensitivity, specificity, and cost of screening endoscopy. A small drop in the health-related quality of life associated with postsurgical states markedly reduced the effectiveness of screening. Simultaneous variations of the prevalence, specificity, and health-related quality of life can easily change screening endoscopy from a life-saving into a life-losing strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Under favorable conditions, general screening by endoscopy of all patients with reflux symptoms to prevent death from esophageal adenocarcinoma may represent a cost-effective strategy; however, such conditions may be difficult to meet.     

Non-invasive (and minimally invasive) diagnosis of oesophageal varices

Current guidelines recommend screening all cirrhotic patients by endoscopy, to identify patients at risk of bleeding who should undergo prophylactic treatment. However, since the prevalence of varices in cirrhotic patients is variable, universal screening would imply a large number of unnecessary endoscopies and a heavy burden for endoscopy units. In addition, compliance to screening programs may be hampered by the perceived unpleasantness of endoscopy. Predicting the presence of oesophageal varices by non-invasive means might increase compliance and would permit to restrict the performance of endoscopy to those patients with a high probability of having varices. Over the years, several studies have addressed this issue by assessing the potential of biochemical, clinical and ultrasound parameters, transient elastography, CT scanning and video capsule endoscopy. The platelet count/spleen diameter ratio, CT scanning and video capsule endoscopy have shown promising performance characteristics, although none of them is equivalent to EGD. These methods are perceived by patients as preferable to endoscopy and thus might increase adherence to screening programs. Whether this will compensate for the lower sensitivity of these alternative techniques, and ultimately improve the outcomes if more patients undergo screening, is the crucial question that will have to be answered in the future.     

Effectiveness of gastric cancer screening programs in South Korea:Organized vs opportunistic models

AIM:To investigate the outcome and effectiveness of two screening programs,National Cancer Screening Program(NCSP)and opportunistic screening(OS),for the detection of gastric cancer. METHODS:A total of 45 654 subjects underwent upper endoscopy as part of the NCSP or OS at the Chung-Ang University Healthcare System in Korea between January 2007 and December 2010.The study population was comprised of subjects over the age of 40 years.More specifically,subjects who took part in the NCSP were Medicaid recipients and beneficiaries of the National Health Insurance Corporation.Still photo-graphs from the endoscopies diagnosed as gastric cancer were reviewed by two experienced endoscopists. RESULTS:The mean age of the screened subjects was 55 years for men and 54 years for women.A total of 126 cases(0.28%)of gastric cancer were detected from both screening programs;100 cases(0.3%)from NCSP and in 26 cases(0.2%)from OS.The proportion of early gastric cancer(EGC)detected in NCSP was higher than that in OS(74.0%vs 53.8%,P=0.046). Among the 34 416 screenees in NCSP,6585(19.1%) underwent upper endoscopy every other year as scheduled.Among the 11 238 screenees in OS,3050(27.1%) underwent upper endoscopy at least once every two years during the study period.The detection rate of gastric cancer was found to be significantly higher during irregular follow-up than during regular follow-up in both screening programs(0.3%vs 0.2%,P=0.036).A higher incidence of EGC than advanced gastric cancer was observed during regular follow-up compared with irregular follow-up. CONCLUSION:Compliance to the screening program is more important than the type of screening system used.     

Cost-effectiveness and long-term impact of Helicobacter pylori 'test and treat' service in reducing open access endoscopy referrals

INTRODUCTION: We have shown that the introduction of a carbon urea breath test (13C-UBT) service for Helicobacter pylori screening and eradication is effective in reducing the rate of open access endoscopy referrals in patients aged < 40 years in the short term. This has been substantiated by several randomized controlled trials comparing a 'test and treat' strategy with early endoscopy in these patients. However, the long-term impact of such a strategy is not established. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the influence of 13C-UBT services on open access endoscopy referral rates in dyspeptic patients under the age of 40 years over a period of 5 years. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of open access endoscopy referral rates between August 1990 and July 2000. Cost minimization analysis was performed with a Decision Analysis Model using Treeage Data 3.5. RESULTS: The total number of open access referrals for endoscopy during 1990-1995 was between 765 and 1325 per year. The proportion of endoscopies performed in patients < 40 years ranged between 33.4% and 34.6%. The total number of endoscopy referrals during 1995-2000 after the introduction of the 13C-UBT services was between 1178 and 1321 per year. However, there was a sustained reduction in the proportion of patients aged < 40 years, ranging between 23.2% and 26.2% (Chi2 = 153.9, degrees of freedom = 9, P < 0.0001) during this period. CONCLUSIONS: The H. pylori screening and treatment strategy using the 13C-UBT service results in a sustained reduction of the number of endoscopy referrals and is cost effective in dyspeptic patients under the age of 40 years, enabling better utilization of available resources.     

Diagnosis and monitoring of portal hypertension.

Currently, oesophago-gastroduodenoscopy is the standard method to diagnose the presence of oesophago-gastric varices and to estimate the risk of bleeding. It is recommended that all patients undergo endoscopic screening for varices at the time when cirrhosis is diagnosed. After screening endoscopy, patients with medium or large varices should be treated to prevent bleeding, while all other patients should undergo periodic surveillance endoscopy. However, at a given point in time a variable proportion of patients will not have varices, since the prevalence of varices is variable. Thus, screening all cirrhotic patients with endoscopy to detect the presence of varices implies a number of unnecessary endoscopies. In recent years a wealth of new methods have been proposed as alternatives to conventional oesophago-gastroduodenoscopy for the non-invasive or minimally invasive diagnosis of oesophageal varices. Three of these methods (the platelet count/spleen diameter ratio, Fibrotest and Fibroscan) are truly non-invasive. Of these, the former is promising and needs a proper validation, Fibrotest appears to be insufficiently precise, while Fibroscan needs further evaluation. Multidetector CT oesophagography and capsule endoscopy are not entirely "non-invasive", since the first requires air insufflation into the oesophagus via an orally passed tube, and the latter requires swallowing the capsule. Multidetector CT oesophagography is promising, but needs further evaluation; capsule endoscopy is safe and reliable and might be proposed as an alternative to oesophago-gastroduodenoscopy in patients unable or unwilling to undergo oesophago-gastroduodenoscopy.     

Incident rates of colonic neoplasia in older patients: When should we stop screening?

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines endorse colon cancer screening every 5-10 years in patients over 50 years of age. However, there is no consensus regarding what age is appropriate to stop screening. The aim of this study was to characterize neoplasia occurrence/recurrence in a large cohort of patients > or =70 years of age undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS: The Mayo Rochester endoscopic database was reviewed to determine the incidence of colonic neoplasia in patients > or =70 years undergoing two colonoscopies at least 12 months apart between January 1996 and December 2000. Patients were classified based on (i) age: 70-74, 75-79, > or =80 years; and (ii) polyp detection on initial examination, that is, subsequent examination for screening or surveillance. RESULTS: Overall, 1353 patients underwent two colonoscopies at least 12 months apart (median interval 140 weeks) with removal of polyp on initial examination in 726 (53.7%) patients (surveillance cohort). On subsequent endoscopy, polyps > or =10 mm were detected in 54 (4.0%) and cancer in 13 (1.0%) patients. All age groups were well matched with respect to detection of neoplasia on index examination (P = 0.9) and polyp size on initial colonoscopy among the surveillance group (P = 0.9). Using a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) for neoplasia (polyps > or =10 mm) were: 2.0 (1.50-2.73, P < 0.0001) (surveillance vs screening), 1.33 (0.96-1.79, P = 0.08) (> or =80 vs 70-74), and 1.05 (0.78-1.38, P = 0.75) (75-79 vs 70-74). Adjusted hazard ratios for development of cancer were: 1.87 (1.03-3.97, P = 0.04) (surveillance vs screening), 1.73 (0.84-3.56, P = 0.13) (> or =80 vs 70-74), and 1.38 (0.71-2.77, P = 0.34) (75-79 vs 70-74). CONCLUSIONS: Prior history of neoplasia remains a strong risk factor for colorectal neoplasia development in elderly patients and should be considered when deciding the need for continuing screening/surveillance. Incident neoplasia rates in a previously screened elderly population rise slowly with advancing age although cancer rates rise more sharply. Therefore, screening still retains a role in elderly patients; however, clinical judgment is still required to individualize screening practice. As the risk of competing comorbid illnesses continues to increase over time, the threshold to perform colon screening should increase accordingly.     

A questionnaire-based survey on screening for gastric and colorectal cancer by physicians in East asian countries in 2010

Background: The incidence of gastric cancer (GC) is high, and colorectal cancer (CRC) has significantly increased in Asian countries. Aim: To examine the current screening for GC and CRC within East Asia by means of a questionnaire survey. Methods: Representative members of the Committee of the International Gastrointestinal Consensus Symposium provided a questionnaire to physicians in six East Asian countries. Results: A total of 449 physicians participated in this survey. In all countries, more than 70% of physicians started GC screening between 40 and 59 years. The most popular method to screen for GC was endoscopy (92.7%), but combination methods such as Helicobacter pylori (HP) antibody, barium X-ray, and tumor marker with endoscopy differed by country. For HP-positive individuals, most physicians screened every year by endoscopy, and for individuals post-HP eradication, about half of physicians (56.3%) thought there was a need to follow-up with GC screening. Among all physicians, the most common age to start CRC screening was in the 40s (39.8%) and 50s (40.9%). Based on the American Cancer Society Recommendations, a fecal occult blood test every year was the most popular method for CRC screening overall. However, among each country, this test was most popular in only Japan (76.9%) and Indonesia. In other countries, sigmoidoscopy every 5 years and total colonoscopy every 10 years were the most popular methods. Conclusion: There are similarities and differences in the screening of GC and CRC among East Asian countries.     

Arterial blood oxygen desaturation in infants and children during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Arterial blood oxygen desaturation and abnormal electrocardiographic changes have been reported in adults undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. We studied 32 infants and children less than 12 years of age using pulse oximetry and continuous electrocardiography before, during, and after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy performed under intravenous sedation. Sinus tachycardia was the most common electrocardiographic change, and no clinically significant electrocardiographic abnormalities were induced by the procedure. Desaturation to less than or equal to 90% was found in 37.5% of the patients and was most commonly noted during the endoscopy procedure and in patients with cardiopulmonary disease. The desaturation was unpredictable because there was no correlation between desaturation and medication, tolerance to the procedure, weight, or age of the child. Some patients who subjectively appeared to tolerate the procedure well had significant desaturation. The use of pulse oximetry should be considered for all children undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.     

Value of screening endoscopy in evaluation of esophageal,gastric and colon cancers

Esophageal,gastric,and colorectal cancers are deadly diseases that continue to plague our world today.The value of screening endoscopy in evaluating these types of cancers is a critical area of discussion due to a potential reduction in morbidity and mortality.This article describes how to identify a good screening test and explains what are important criteria in the field of screening endoscopy.Furthermore,the current status and progress of screening endoscopy for esophageal,gastric,and colorectal cancer will be evaluated and discussed.Mass screening programs have not been implemented for esophageal and gastric carcinomas in those with average or low risk populations.However,studies of high-risk populations have found value and a cost-benefit in conducting screening endoscopy.Colorectal cancer,on the other hand,has had mass screening programs in place for many years due to the clear evidence of improved outcomes.As the role of endoscopy as a screening tool has continued to develop,newer technology and techniques have emerged to improve its utility.Many new image enhancement techniques and computer processing programs have shown promise and may have a significant role in the future of endoscopic screening.These developments are paving the way for improving the diagnostic and therapeutic capability of endoscopy in the field of gastroenterology.     

Determinants of colorectal cancer screening in women undergoing mammography

OBJECTIVES: Women who participate in screening for breast cancer are more likely to participate in screening for colorectal cancer. We studied such a motivated group of women to identify predictors of, and barriers to, participation in colorectal cancer screening by endoscopy. METHODS: We distributed surveys to 551 women > or = 50 yr of age while they were awaiting mammography at four sites in and around Boston, MA from June to September, 2000. The 40-question survey assessed knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about, and behaviors toward, breast and colorectal cancer screening. Regression models were used to determine factors associated with having had sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. RESULTS: Seventy-nine percent of the women completed all or part of the survey. Half (221/438) reported ever having had sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. Of these, 93% did so at the recommendation of their primary care provider. Factors associated with participation in endoscopic screening included compliance with annual fecal occult blood testing, a family history of colorectal cancer, and indifference toward the gender of the doctor performing the endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing mammography overwhelmingly cite the recommendation of their primary care provider as the reason for participating in colorectal cancer screening by endoscopy. Women who preferred a female endoscopist were less likely to have been screened. Whenever possible, primary care providers should offer women the choice of a female endoscopist for colorectal cancer screening.     

Sedationless upper endoscopy

The use of sedation with peroral passage of conventionally sized endoscopes for upper endoscopy is the standard practice for most endoscopists in the United States. The administration of sedatives requires time-consuming and resource-intensive patient monitoring, has substantial cost, and can produce side effects and rare complications. Ultra-thin videoendoscopes (outer diameter less than 6 mm) have been developed, can easily be passed transorally or transnasally without sedation, and have been shown to be well tolerated and accurate. Unsedated upper endoscopy can provide an efficient, cost-effective alternative to standard endoscopy, should be useful for endoscopic screening, and can be offered as an option to conventional sedated examination.     

Sedationless upper endoscopy

The use of sedation with peroral passage of conventionally sized endoscopes for upper endoscopy is the standard practice for most endoscopists in the United States. The administration of sedatives requires time-consuming and resource-intensive patient monitoring, has substantial cost, and can produce side effects and rare complications. Ultra-thin videoendoscopes (outer diameter less than 6 mm) have been developed, can easily be passed transorally or transnasally without sedation, and have been shown to be well tolerated and accurate. Unsedated upper endoscopy can provide an efficient, cost-effective alternative to standard endoscopy, should be useful for endoscopic screening, and can be offered as an option to conventional sedated examination.     

Can Screening for IgG Antibodies Against Helicobacter pylori Be Used in Clinical Practice? (Omit Endoscopy in Seropositive or Seronegative Patients?)

The objective of this study was to test thefeasibility of a screening strategy for IgG antibodiesagainst Helicobacter pylori in patients presenting withupper abdominal complaints. Biopsy specimens were taken for histological and microbiologicalinvestigations from consecutive patients undergoingupper gastrointestinal endoscopy. In addition, a serumsample was taken for detection of IgG antibodies against Helicobacter pylori, using an ELISA technique.Serum samples from 1294 consecutive patients wereavailable. IgG antibodies against Helicobacter pyloriwere present in 622 patients (48%), the remaining 671 (52%) were negative. If endoscopy had beenomitted in seronegative patients below the age of 45years, this would have resulted in 234 patients notendoscoped. However, it can be assumed that 62 of these patients would undergo endoscopy becauseof recurrent complaints due to underlying disease orabnormality. Therefore 182 of 1294 (14%) of endoscopieswould have been avoided. Application of this strategy on the total group of seronegatives would save353 of 1294 (27.3%) endoscopies. If endoscopy had beenomitted in seropositive cases below the age of 45 years,and these patients were treated with anti-Helicobactertherapy, an initial 145 endoscopies would have beenavoided. However, 26 of these patients would undergoendoscopy because of persistent complaints due tounderlying disease. Therefore 119 (9%) endoscopies would have been avoided.Applying this strategy in the total group ofseropositives would have saved 434 of 1294 endoscopies(34%). Applying the IgG screening strategy in allpatients would result in a significant number of endoscopiesbeing avoided in the seropositive group, 434 versus 353(P < 0.001). In conclusion, omitting endoscopy inseropositive cases, regardless of age, can reduce the workload more than omitting endoscopy inseronegative cases: 34% fewer endoscopies versus27%.     

Clinicopathological features of gastric cancer detected by endoscopy as part of annual health checkup

Background and Aim: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is generally accepted as the gold standard for the clinical evaluation of gastric cancer (GC). However, the efficacy of endoscopic screening for asymptomatic GC remains controversial. The present study is designed to clarify the efficacy of endoscopic screening for the detection of early GC by investigating the clinicopathological features. Methods: A total of 17 522 patients who had underwent endoscopic screening as a part of their annual health checkup at the Seirei Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine between April 2002 and March 2006 were enrolled in this study. We investigated the clinicopathological findings of GC detected by endoscopy. Furthermore, in accordance with the screening interval at our center, patients with GC were categorized into two groups: group A, patients with repeated endoscopic screening within the last 2 years, and group B, patients without endoscopic screening within the last 2 years. Results: Thirty‐nine GC (mean age of patients: 62.2 ± 8.0 years, 36 males and three females) were detected in total (0.22%). The proportion of early GC was 87.2%. Notable differences between groups A and B were not found in the rate of early GC (P = 0.6342). However, eight of 27 cases (29.6%) in group A were treated by endoscopic resection, but none in group B (P = 0.0344). In six of 26 cases (23.1%) in group A, the recorded images from the previous endoscopic examination indicated some macroscopic abnormalities at the same location, suggesting GC or premalignant lesions. Conclusion: Endoscopic screening is useful for detecting GC at the early stages, and repeated examinations at short‐time intervals contribute to the detection of resectable lesions by endoscopy. Further studies are needed to decrease the false negative rate of endoscopic screening.     

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PULSE WAVE VELOCITY AND CIRCULATORY HEMODYNAMICS DURING UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY

Background: Arterial stiffness has recently been proposed as a powerful independent predictor of cardiovascular disease. The aim of the present study was to establish the relationship between aortic stiffness and circulatory complications during gastrointestinal endoscopy using pulse wave velocity (PWV) as a parameter. Methods: We serially monitored standard 12‐lead ECGs, blood pressure, and percutaneous arterial oxygen saturation during gastrointestinal endoscopy, and performed a spectral analysis of heart rate variability and an analysis of QT dispersion. We also performed a logistic multivariate analysis of the severity of atherosclerosis and changes in the circulatory kinetics using PWV. Results: In the elderly group (older than 65 years), the rate of decrease in parasympathetic nervous activity and rate of change in blood pressure and QT dispersion were significantly larger than those in the non‐elderly group (younger than 65 years) (P < 0.05). However, a multivariate analysis showed that the relative risk for the grade of atherosclerosis was greater in an evaluation by PWV than by age. Conclusions: We conclude that the grade of atherosclerosis, as evaluated from PWV, is a stronger predictive factor for changes in circulatory kinetics during gastrointestinal endoscopy than age. PWV screening may facilitate the prevention of cardiac accidents during gastrointestinal endoscopy to some degree.