Preinterventional peak monocyte count and in-stent intimal hyperplasia after coronary stent implantation in human coronary arteries

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of restenosis after stent implantation principally is neointimal hyperplasia. There is evidence that monocytes play a important role in in-stent restenosis (ISR) after stent implantation. Hypothesis: This study assessed the relationship between preinterventional peak monocyte count and neointimal growth after successful stent implantation. METHODS: We performed coronary stent implantation in 85 patients (85 de novo lesions). Peripheral blood sample was obtained in all patients every 12 h before coronary angiography for measurement of peripheral monocytes. All patients received angiographic and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) follow-up at 6 months after stenting. RESULTS: The preinterventional circulating monocyte count was significantly higher in the ISR group than that in the group without ISR (654 +/- 62/vs. 461 +/- 222/mm3, p < 0.001) and was significantly higher in the reintervention group than that in the no-reintervention group (660 +/- 72/ vs. 470 +/- 216/mm3, p< 0.001). The incidence of ISR and repeat intervention associated with preinterventional monocyte count was highest among the patients in the highest tertile, who were at a 2.64-fold increased risk of ISR and 3.22-fold increased risk of repeat intervention compared with the patients in the lowest tertile. A significant positive correlation was found between preinterventional peak monocyte count and preinterventional plaque and media cross-sectional area and follow-up neointima area (r = 0.311, p = 0.007, r = 0.465, p < 0.001, respectively). The neointima area associated with preinterventional monocyte count was largest among the patients in the highest tertile, that is, 2-fold larger than that of the patients in the lowest tertile (p < 0.001) and 1.44-fold larger than that of the patients in the middle tertile (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that circulating preinterventional monocytes play a principal role in the process of in-stent neointimal growth after successful stent implantation.     

Thiazolidinedione treatment attenuates diffuse neointimal hyperplasia in restenotic lesions after coronary stent implantation in type 2 diabetic patients: an intravascular ultrasound study

OBJECTIVES: Thiazolidinedione treatment reduces neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation in diabetic patients. However, in-stent restenosis still persists in patients treated with thiazolidinedione. The effect of thiazolidinedione treatment on the pattern of in-stent restenosis remains unclear. This study investigated whether thiazolidinedione treatment attenuates diffuse neointimal hyperplasia in restenotic lesions after coronary stent implantation in diabetic patients. METHODS: Volumetric intravascular ultrasound was performed at 6 months after coronary stent implantation in 76 patients with restenotic lesions who received either conventional anti-diabetic treatment (control group, n = 56) or thiazolidinedione treatment (thiazolidinedione group, n = 20). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in stent volume (99 +/- 32 vs 90 +/- 20 mm3, respectively, p = 0.26) or in minimal lumen area in the stent (1.4 +/- 0.6 vs 1.6 +/- 0.5 mm2, respectively, p = 0.11). However, there were significant reductions in neointimal volume (56 +/- 25 vs 36 +/- 11 mm3, respectively, p < 0.01)and neointimal index (56 +/- 11% vs 41 +/- 8%, respectively, p < 0.01) in the thiazolidinedione group. Coefficient of variation of neointimal tissue accumulation was greater in the thiazolidinedione group (45.5%) than in the control group (25.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular ultrasound study demonstrated that together with reduction of overall neointimal tissue proliferation, thiazolidinedione treatment caused greater point-to-point heterogeneity in the neointimal tissue accumulation in restenotic lesions after coronary stent implantation. This finding strongly suggests that thiazolidinedione treatment attenuates diffuse in-stent restenosis in diabetic patients.     

Local intracoronary administration of antisense oligonucleotide against c-myc for the prevention of in-stent restenosis: results of the randomized investigation by the Thoraxcenter of antisense DNA using local delivery and IVUS after coronary stenting (ITALICS) trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine whether antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN) directed against the nuclear proto-oncogene c-myc could inhibit restenosis when given by local delivery immediately after coronary stent implantation. BACKGROUND: Failure of conventional pharmacologic therapies to reduce the incidence of coronary restenosis after percutaneous revascularization techniques has prompted interest in the use of agents that target intracellular central regulatory mechanisms. METHODS: Eighty-five patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg of phosphorothioate-modified 15-mer antisense ODN or saline vehicle by intracoronary local delivery after coronary stent implantation. The primary end point was percent neointimal volume obstruction measured by computerized analysis of electrocardiogram-gated intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) at six-month follow-up. Secondary end points included clinical outcome and quantitative coronary angiography analysis. RESULTS: Analysis of follow-up IVUS data was performed on 77 patients. In-stent volume obstruction was similar between groups (44 +/- 16% and 46 +/- 14%, placebo vs. ODN; p = 0.57; 95% confidence interval: -1.13 to 0.85). Minimum luminal diameter increased from 0.84 +/- 0.36 and 0.90 +/- 0.45 (p = 0.55) to 2.70 +/- 0.37 and 2.80 +/- 0.37 (p = 0.28) after stent implantation, which decreased to 1.50 +/- 0.61 and 1.50 +/- 0.53 (p = 0.98) by six months, yielding similar loss indexes (placebo vs. ODN, respectively). There were no differences in angiographic restenosis rates (38.5 and 34.2%; p = 0.81; placebo vs. ODN) or clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with 10 mg of phosphorothioate-modified ODN directed against c-myc does not reduce neointimal volume obstruction or the angiographic restenosis rate in this patient population.     

The relationship between preprocedural platelet size and subsequent in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVE: Elevated mean platelet volume predicts restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty but its effect on the development of in-stent restenosis is not known. We assessed the effect of mean platelet volume measured before coronary stent implantation for stable angina pectoris on subsequent development of in-stent restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed the data of 60 patients who had stent implantation on one native coronary artery for stable angina pectoris and control angiographies for clinically suspected restenosis within 6 months. Mean platelet volume was measured by auto analyzer one day before stent implantation. Clinical and demographic data and laboratory results were obtained from the hospital charts of the patients. In-stent restenosis was evaluated visually from control angiograms. Angiographic in-stent restenosis was present in 35 (58%) of 60 patients and 25 (42%) patients had no restenosis. Mean platelet volume in the in-stent restenosis group was 8.28 +/- 0.71 fl compared to 7.63 +/- 0.74 fl in the no-restenosis group (p = 0.001). There was a positive correlation between preprocedural mean platelet volume and development of in-stent restenosis (r = 0.44; p < 0.001). A mean platelet volume value of > or = 8.4 fl was associated with an odds ratio of 16.0 for development of in-stent restenosis, with high specificity and positive predictivity but poor sensitivity and negative predictivity (96%, 93%, 40% and 53%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Mean platelet volume measured before stent implantation is correlated with subsequent development of in-stent restenosis. If preprocedural mean platelet volume is greater than 8.4 fl, in-stent restenosis is more probable to occur.     

Chest pain after coronary artery stent implantation

A sizeable proportion of patients who undergo successful coronary artery stent implantation experiences chest pain immediately after the procedure and/or in the following months in the absence of in-stent restenosis. We investigated this phenomenon in 57 consecutive patients with stable angina who underwent successful stent implantation. Chest pain characteristics were assessed before stent implantation and during 6-month follow-up. All patients underwent coronary angiography within 6 months of the procedure 48 hours after exercise thallium-201 perfusion scintigraphy. Patients who did not exhibit in-stent restenosis underwent an ergonovine test at the end of routine coronary angiography. During follow-up, 15 patients complained of chest pain. Six of these patients exhibited scintigraphic evidence of myocardial ischemia and in-stent restenosis at angiography. In the remaining 9 patients, chest pain occurred in the absence of in-stent restenosis at angiography. In 8 of these patients intracoronary ergonovine administration reproduced their habitual pain, whereas it did not cause any pain in the 42 patients who were completely asymptomatic at follow-up and without in-stent restenosis. Ergonovine caused more intense vasoconstriction and nitroglycerin caused more intense vasodilation of the reference coronary diameter in patients with than in patients without ergonovine-induced pain (-17 +/- 3 vs -9 +/- 3%, p <0.001; 9 +/- 6 vs 5 +/- 4%, p <0.02, respectively). In conclusion, chest pain with features similar to habitual angina occurs in the absence of in-stent restenosis in 1/5 of patients after stent implantation and appears to be associated with more intense coronary vasoreactivity.     

Troglitazone reduces neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: a serial intravascular ultrasound study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to determine whether troglitazone reduces neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). BACKGROUND: Increased in-stent restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus is due to accelerated neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation. Troglitazone inhibits intimal hyperplasia in experimental animal models. METHODS: We studied 62 stented lesions in 52 patients with plasma glucose levels (PG) > or = 11.1 mmol/liter at 2 h after 75 g oral glucose load. The study patients were randomized into two groups: the troglitazone group of 25 patients with 29 stents, who were treated with 400 mg of troglitazone, and the control group of 27 patients with 33 stents. All patients underwent oral glucose tolerance tests before and after their six-month treatment period. The sum of PG (sum of PG) and the sum of insulin levels (sum of IRI) were measured. Serial (postintervention and at six-month follow-up) intravascular ultrasound studies were performed. Cross-sectional images within stents were taken at every 1 mm, using an automatic pullback. Stent areas (SA), lumen areas (LA), and intimal areas (IA = SA - LA) were measured and averaged over a number of selected image slices. The intimal index was calculated as intimal index = averaged IA/averaged SA x 100%. RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups before treatment in sum of PG (31.35 +/- 3.07 mmol/liter vs. 32.89 +/- 4.87 mmol/liter, respectively, p = 0.2998) and sum of IRI (219.6 +/- 106.2 mU/liter vs. 209.2 +/- 91.6 mU/liter, respectively, p = 0.8934). However, reductions in sum of PG at the six-month follow-up in the troglitazone group were significantly greater than those in the control group (-21.4 +/- 8.8% vs. -4.5 +/- 7.4%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Likewise, decreases in sum of IRI were greater in the troglitazone-treated group (-31.4 +/- 17.9% vs. -1.9 +/- 15.1%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Although, there were no differences between the two groups in SA at postintervention (7.4 +/- 2.2 mm2 vs. 7.3 +/- 1.7 mm2, respectively, p = 0.9482) and at follow-up (7.3 +/- 2.3 mm2 vs. 7.3 +/- 1.8 mm2, respectively, p = 0.2307), the LA at follow-up in the troglitazone group was significantly greater than that in the control group (5.3 +/- 1.7 mm2 vs. 3.7 +/- 1.7 mm2, respectively, p = 0.0002). The IA at follow-up in the troglitazone group was significantly smaller than that in the control group (2.0 +/- 0.9 mm2 vs. 3.5 +/- 1.8 mm2, respectively, p < 0.0001). This was also true for intimal index (27.1 +/- 11.5% vs. 49.0 +/- 14.4%, respectively, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Serial intravascular ultrasound assessment shows that administration of troglitazone reduces neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation in patients with NIDDM.     

Mechanisms of acute lumen gain and recurrent restenosis after rotational atherectomy of diffuse in-stent restenosis: a quantitative angiographic and intravascular ultrasound study.

OBJECTIVES: This quantitative angiographic and intravascular ultrasound study determined the mechanisms of acute lumen enlargement and recurrent restenosis after rotational atherectomy (RA) with adjunct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis remains a significant clinical problem for which optimal treatment is under debate. Rotational atherectomy has become an alternative therapeutic approach for the treatment of diffuse ISR based on the concept of "tissue-debulking." METHODS: Rotational atherectomy with adjunct angioplasty of ISR was used in 45 patients with diffuse lesions. Quantitative coronary angiographic (QCA) analysis and sequential intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurements were performed in all patients. Forty patients (89%) underwent angiographic six-month follow-up. RESULTS: Rotational atherectomy lead to a decrease in maximal area of stenosis from 80+/-32% before intervention to 54+/-21% after RA (p < 0.0001) as a result of a significant decrease in intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area (CSA). The minimal lumen diameter after RA remained 15+/-4% smaller than the burr diameter used, indicating acute neointimal recoil. Additional angioplasty led to a further decrease in area of stenosis to 38+/-12% due to a significant increase in stent CSA. At six-month angiographic follow-up, recurrent restenosis rate was 45%. Lesion and stent length, preinterventional diameter stenosis and amount of acute neointimal recoil were associated with a higher rate of recurrent restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Rotational atherectomy of ISR leads to acute lumen gain by effective plaque removal. Adjunct angioplasty results in additional lumen gain by further stent expansion and tissue extrusion. Stent and lesion length, severity of ISR and acute neointimal recoil are predictors of recurrent restenosis.     

"Head-to-head comparison between sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with complex coronary artery disease: an intravascular ultrasound study".

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess neointimal hyperplasia following sirolimus-eluting (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) implantation in a patients with complex coronary disease. METHOD: Between January to December 2004, 70 patients were enrolled in this study (SES = 37; PES = 33. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of SES and PES on neointimal proliferation inhibition in patients with complex coronary lesions by volumetric 3D intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assessment at six-month follow-up. RESULTS: Baseline clinical, demographic or angiographic characteristics were well balanced in both groups. All procedures as well as hospitalisation were uneventful. The percentage of B2/C lesions in our study was > 90% in both groups. The IVUS-assessed in-stent mean neointimal hyperplasia volume was significantly lower in lesions treated with SES compared to PES (4.1 +/- 11 mm3 vs. 17.4 +/- 23 mm3, p < 0.002) at 6 month follow-up. No difference in both MACE (3.0 versus 6.0%, p = NS) and restenosis (5.4 versus 9.1%, p = NS) were found. The in-segment late loss at six month was 0.26 mm in the SES and 0.48 mm in the PES group (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed reduced neointimal proliferation after sirolimuseluting as compared to paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with complex coronary artery disease. Both SES and PES were associated with low rate of angiographic restenosis or major adverse cardiovascular events.     

Saline infusion via local drug delivery catheters is associated with increased neointimal hyperplasia in a porcine coronary in-stent restenosis model

BACKGROUND: Catheter-based local drug delivery at the site of stent implantation has been proposed to reduce in-stent restenosis. We examined whether local delivery itself may cause additional vessel wall injury and negate the potential benefit of local drug delivery in a porcine coronary in-stent restenosis model. METHODS: Pigs were randomly assigned to no local delivery (controls, n = 10) or local saline infusion (5 ml) using commercially available catheters (n = 39; Dispatch catheter, Microporous Infusion catheter, and InfusaSleeve) prior to oversized (stent:artery ratio 1.2) coronary stent implantation. The amount of in-stent neointima was evaluated 4 weeks later with angiography and histology. RESULTS: There was no difference in vessel size or stent: artery ratio. However, at follow-up the local saline delivery group had significantly greater diameter stenosis (50 +/- 19% versus 25 +/- 17% in the controls, P < 0.01). Histology revealed similar injury scores but significantly greater neointimal area in the local saline group (3.61 +/- 1.11 mm2 versus 1.96 +/- 0.82 mm2 in the controls, P < 0.01). In a multivariate linear regression analysis, the use of the local delivery catheter was the only independent variable which was positively correlated with the amount of neointima (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this in-stent restenosis model, catheter-based local saline delivery was associated with significantly increased neointimal hyperplasia. Thus, for local drug delivery to reduce in-stent restenosis, the antiproliferative agent should be potent enough to compensate for the additional neointimal hyperplasia from the infusion itself.     

Comparison between sirolimus-eluting stents and intracoronary catheter-based beta radiation for the treatment of in-stent restenosis

We report the outcomes of patients who had in-stent restenosis (IRS) that was treated with intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) or sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. The benefit of IVBT for treating ISR is well documented. SES implantation decreases first-time ISR and, in preliminary reports, has been used to treat ISR. Fifty consecutive patients who had ISR were treated; the first 25 patients underwent SES implantation and the next 25 patients were treated with IVBT using a beta-Cath System (a 40-mm strontium-90/yttrium-90 source). Quantitative angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up were performed at 5.2 +/- 1.1 and 12.1 +/- 1.2 months; clinical follow-up was performed at 15 months. SES deployment and IVBT were successful in all patients. At 12-month follow-up, 8 patients who underwent IVBT had angiographic recurrence (4 in the stent and 4 at the stent edge); only 1 patient who underwent SES implantation developed recurrent ISR. At 12 months, in-stent late luminal loss was similar between the SES and IVBT groups (0.35 +/- 0.45 vs 0.34 +/- 0.46 mm, p = 0.9); however, in-stent net luminal gain was higher in the SES group than in the IVBT group (1.32 +/- 0.13 vs 0.57 +/- 0.19 mm, p <0.0001), and in-lesion late luminal loss was higher in the IVBT group (0.48 +/- 0.32 vs 0.16 +/- 0.42 mm, p = 0.004). At 12 months, intravascular ultrasound stent volume obstruction was higher after IVBT versus than after SES implantation (38.7% vs 6.7%, p <0.0001). At 15-month clinical follow-up, 64% and 96% (p <0.01) of patients who underwent IVBT and SES implantation, respectively, were free of major adverse cardiac events. In conclusion SES implantation for the treatment of ISR was effective and superior to catheter-based IVBT in preventing recurrent neointimal proliferation and angiographic restenosis at 1-year follow-up.     

Effect of local delivery of L-arginine on in-stent restenosis in humans

To determine whether intramural administration of L-arginine reduces intimal thickening after optimal Palmaz-Schatz stent deployment in humans, 50 patients with native coronary artery disease who received a single Palmaz-Schatz stent were enrolled in this pilot study. Patients were randomized into 2 treatment groups: an L-arginine group (n = 25) and a saline group (n = 25). After stent deployment, L-arginine (600 mg/6 ml) or saline (6 ml) was locally delivered via the Dispatch catheter (Scimed) over 15 minutes. Serial angiography and intravascular ultrasound examinations (motorized pull-back at 0.5 mm/s) were performed before and after the procedure, and at 6-month follow-up. Measurements of stent area, lumen area, and neointimal area were computed within the stents at 1-mm intervals, by technicians who were blinded to the treatment assignment. Using Simpson's rule, stent, plaque, and lumen volumes, neointimal volume within the stent, and percent neointimal volume were measured before and after the procedure, and at 6-month follow-up. The 6-month volume data in quantitative coronary ultrasound showed that neointimal volume in the L-arginine group was significantly less than in the saline group (25 vs 39 mm(3); p = 0.049). Similarly, percent neointimal volume was significantly less in the L-arginine group at 6-month follow-up (17 +/- 13% vs 27 +/- 21%; p = 0.048). Thus, these results showed that local delivery of L-arginine reduces in-stent neointimal hyperplasia in humans, indicating that this approach may be a novel strategy to prevent in-stent restenosis.     

Does Carbofilm Coating Affect In‐Stent Intimal Proliferation? A Randomized Trial Comparing Rx Multi‐Link Penta and Tecnic Carbostent™ Stents: SIROCCO Trial

OBJECTIVES:To compare the volume of in-stent neointimal proliferation, assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), at 6-month follow-up after implantation of a coronary Carbofilm-coated stent (Tecnic Carbostent, Sorin Biomedica Cardio, Saluggia, Italy) versus a conventional 316 L stent (Rx Multi-Link Penta, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL). BACKGROUND:Many trials suggest that stent characteristics and coating could be important determinants of restenosis. METHODS:From October 2004 to May 2005, 63 patients were randomized to Tecnic (T, n = 30) or Penta (P, n = 33). The primary end-point was in-stent volume of neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) measured by IVUS at 6 months. The secondary end-points included binary restenosis, minimal luminal diameter (MLD), target lesion revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events. RESULTS:There were no significant differences between T and P as to mean age, male gender, clinical status, complexity of the lesion, lesion length, reference vessel diameter before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), MLD pre-PCI, and stent-to-artery ratio. However, MLD poststenting was greater in P group than T group (2.81 +/- 0.45 mm vs. 2.49 +/- 0.33 mm, P < 0.002). At 6 months, angiographic late lumen loss (0.61 +/- 0.51 mm vs. 0.92 +/- 0.61 mm, P < 0.043), in-stent obstruction (25.86 +/- 16.48% vs. 38.33 +/- 19.56%, P = 0.021), and in-stent late loss volume (31.62 +/- 29.75 mm(3) vs. 57.28 +/- 37.16 mm(3), P = 0.016) were significantly lower in T group than in P group. CONCLUSION:Penta stent appears to offer a better deployment and a larger MLD post-PCI than Carbofilm-coated stent. However, a thicker NIH was observed on Penta stent at 6-month follow-up, when compared to Tecnic.     

Intracoronary brachytherapy after stenting de novo lesions in diabetic patients: results of a randomized intravascular ultrasound study

OBJECTIVES: We studied the efficacy of intracoronary brachytherapy (ICB) after successful coronary stenting in diabetic patients with de novo lesions. BACKGROUND: Intracoronary brachytherapy has proven effective in preventing recurrences in patients with in-stent restenosis. However, the role of ICB for the treatment of de novo coronary stenoses remains controversial. METHODS: Ninety-two patients were randomized to either ICB or no radiation after stenting. Primary end points were in-stent mean neointimal area (primary end point of efficacy) and minimal luminal area of the entire vessel segment (primary end point of effectiveness), as assessed by intravascular ultrasound at six-month follow-up. Quantitative coronary angiography analysis was performed at the target, injured, irradiated, and entire vessel segments. RESULTS: At follow-up, the in-stent mean neointimal area was 52% smaller in the ICB group (p < 0.0001). However, there was no difference in the minimal luminal area of the vessel segment (4.5 +/- 2.4 mm2 vs. 4.4 +/- 2.1 mm2). Restenosis rates increased progressively by the analyzed segment in the ICB group: target (7.1% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.07), injured (9.5% vs. 20.9%, p = NS), irradiated (14.3% vs. 20.9%, p = NS), and vessel segment (23.8% vs. 25.6%, p = NS). At one year, 1 cardiac death, 6 myocardial infarctions (MIs) (3 due to late stent thrombosis), and 10 target vessel revascularizations (TVRs) (6 due to the edge effect) occurred in the ICB group, whereas in the nonradiation group, there were 11 TVRs and no deaths or MIs. CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary brachytherapy significantly inhibited in-stent neointimal hyperplasia after stenting in diabetic patients. However, clinically this was counteracted by the occurrence of the edge effect and late stent thrombosis.     

Comparison of effects of drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents on plasma C-reactive protein levels

After coronary stenting, inflammatory mechanisms play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of neointimal proliferation and in-stent restenosis. Drug-eluting stents (DESs) have been shown to decrease in-stent restenosis in different studies. We compared plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) levels after DES implantation with levels after bare metal stent (BMS) implantation. We performed percutaneous coronary intervention with a single stent in 67 patients (54 men; 59 +/- 9 years of age; n = 21 in the BMS group, n = 46 in the DES group) who had stable angina. Plasma CRP levels were determined before intervention and at 48 hours, 72 hours, and 2 weeks after coronary stenting. There was no difference in clinical and angiographic baseline characteristics except that the DES group had more patients with diabetes (34.8% vs 9.5%, p = 0.04), smaller reference vessels (2.95 +/- 0.53 vs 3.29 +/- 0.53 mm, p = 0.02), and smaller stent diameters (3.0 +/- 0.4 mm vs 3.4 +/- 0.5 mm, p <0.01). Plasma CRP levels at 48 hours (13.4 +/- 14.7 vs 5.9 +/- 4.9 mg/L, p <0.01) and 72 hours (16.7 +/- 19.8 vs 5.4 +/- 3.9 mg/L, p <0.01) after stent implantation were significantly higher in the BMS than in the DES group. In conclusion, DESs showed significantly lower plasma CRP levels after coronary stenting compared with BMSs. This may reflect the potent effects of DESs on acute inflammatory reactions induced by coronary intervention.     

The TRAPIST Study. A multicentre randomized placebo controlled clinical trial of trapidil for prevention of restenosis after coronary stenting, measured by 3-D intravascular ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported benefit of oral therapy with the phosphodiesterase inhibitor, trapidil, in reducing restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Coronary stenting is associated with improved late outcome compared with balloon angioplasty, but significant neointimal hyperplasia still occurs in a considerable proportion of patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of trapidil 200 mg in preventing in-stent restenosis. METHODS: Patients with a single native coronary lesion requiring revascularization were randomized to placebo or trapidil at least 1 h before, and continuing for 6 months after, successful implantation of a coronary Wallstent. The primary end-point was in-stent neointimal volume measured by three-dimensional reconstruction of intravascular ultrasound images recorded at the 6 month follow-up catheterization. RESULTS: Of 312 patients randomized at 21 centres in nine countries, 303 (148 trapidil, 155 placebo) underwent successful Wallstent implantation, and 139 patients (90%) in the placebo group and 130 (88%) in the trapidil group had repeat catheterization at 26+/-2 weeks. There was no significant difference between trapidil and placebo-treated patients regarding in-stent neointimal volume (108.6+/- 95.6 mm(3)vs 93.3+/-79.1 mm(3);P=0.16) or % obstruction volume (38+/-18% vs 36+/-21%;P=0.32), in angiographic minimal luminal diameter at follow-up (1.63+/-0.61 mm vs 1.74+/-0.69 mm;P=0.17), restenosis rate (31% vs 24%;P=0.24), cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events at 7 months (22% vs 20%;P=0.71) or anginal complaints (30% vs 24%;P=0.29). CONCLUSION: Oral trapidil 600 mg daily for 6 months did not reduce in-stent hyperplasia or improve clinical outcome after successful Wallstent implantation and is not indicated for this purpose.     

Balloon angioplasty for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: immediate results and 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate

Objectives. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the immediate results and the 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis.Background. Despite excellent immediate and mid-term results, 20% to 30% of patients with coronary stent implantation will present an angiographic restenosis and may require additional treatment. The optimal treatment for in-stent restenosis is still unclear.Methods. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analyses were performed before and after stent implantation, before and after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis and on a 6-month systematic coronary angiogram to assess the recurrent angiographic restenosis rate.Results. Balloon angioplasty was performed in 52 patients presenting in-stent restenosis. In-stent restenosis was either diffuse (≥ 10 mm) inside the stent (71%) or focal (29%). Mean stent length was 16 ± 7 mm. Balloon diameter of 2.98 ± 0.37 mm and maximal inflation pressure of 10 ± 3 atm were used for balloon angioplasty. Angiographic success rate was 100% without any complication. Acute gain was lower after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis than after stent implantation: 1.19 ± 0.60 mm vs. 1.75 ± 0.68 mm (p = 0.0002). At 6-month follow-up, 60% of patients were asymptomatic and no patient died. Eighteen patients (35%) had repeat target vessel revascularization. Angiographic restenosis rate was 54%. Recurrent restenosis rate was higher when in-stent restenosis was diffuse: 63% vs. 31% when focal, p = 0.046.Conclusions. Although balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis can be safely and successfully performed, it leads to less immediate stenosis improvement than at time of stent implantation and carries a high recurrent angiographic restenosis rate at 6 months, in particular in diffuse in-stent restenosis lesions.     

The effect of paclitaxel-eluting stents on restenosis]

OBJECTIVE: In our study we aimed to investigate the effects of paclitaxel-eluting stent on restenosis. METHODS: Sixteen porcine were randomly assigned to two groups (n=8 per group): control group animals received conventional stent implantation and study group animals -paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation. Both groups were treated with 300 mg acetylsalicylic acid and 75 mg clopidogrel daily. The degree of neointimal proliferation and effect of drug-eluting stent on restenosis were evaluated 6 weeks after by angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). RESULTS: Angiographic in-stent restenosis was lower in paclitaxel-eluting stent group (12.50 +/- 7.07% versus 41.25 +/- 28.50%, p=0.001). The IVUS data demonstrated that paclitaxel group animals had larger minimal lumen area (8.76 +/- 1.09 mm2 versus 6.23 +/- 3.10 mm2, p=0.028), smaller mean neointimal proliferation area (1.03 +/- 0.75 mm2 versus 3.55 +/- 2.86 mm2, p=0.01) and mean percent stenosis (10.71 +/- 8.10% versus 36.85 +/- 30.93%, p=0.01). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that drug-eluting stents may also have a preventive effect for the in-stent restenosis.     

The effect of long-term clopidogrel use on neointimal formation after percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long term effect of clopidogrel-based antiplatelet therapy on neointimal formation. METHODS: This study comprised 78 patients with typical stable angina pectoris or documented myocardial ischaemia, and with only one angiographic lesion in one native coronary artery undergoing successful stent implantation without predilatation with C-reactive protein levels < or =5 mg/l at 72 h after the procedure. All patients received dual antiplatelet therapy with 75 mg/day clopidogrel and 300 mg/day aspirin for four weeks. Clopidogrel was switched to isochronous placebo in half of the patients (n=39) at the end of the fourth week. This allocation was maintained for 20 weeks, and at week 24 of the study, coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound imaging were performed again in all cases in order to evaluate the changes that had occurred in the in-stent neointimal formation; rates of restenosis were also recorded RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up period, angiographic stenosis diameter and restenosis rates were smaller in the clopidogrel group than in the placebo group (23.3% versus 35.6%, p=0.05 and 5.12% versus 10.25%; p=0.03 respectively); the intravascular ultrasonographic neointimal cross sectional area was also smaller in the clopidogrel group (3.6 +/- 2.7 mm(2) versus 5.2 +/- 2.5 mm(2), p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term clopidogrel administration significantly reduced neointimal formation at the stent site as well as reducing major clinical events in patients who did not develop high-risk systemic inflammatory response after percutaneous coronary intervention.     

Six-month clinical and angiographic outcome after successful excimer laser angioplasty for in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the clinical and angiographic six-month follow-up after excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) for restenosed coronary stents. BACKGROUND: Excimer laser coronary angioplasty has recently been shown to be safe and efficient for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. METHODS: Ninety-six consecutive patients successfully treated with ELCA within 141 stents were included in a six-month clinical and angiographic follow-up. RESULTS: During follow-up there was one sudden death and one patient with documented myocardial infarction. Angina pectoris classified as > or = Canadian Cardiovascular Society II reoccurred in 49 patients. Follow-up angiography was obtained in 89 patients (93%) with 133 stents. Quantitative coronary angiography revealed a mean diameter stenosis of 77 +/- 10% before intervention, 41 +/- 12% after laser treatment and 11% +/- 12% after adjunctive percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (p < 0.001). Six months after ELCA the mean diameter stenosis had increased to 60 +/- 26% (p < 0.001). A > or =50% diameter stenosis was present in 48 patients (54%); in 24 of these patients diameter stenosis was > or =70%. Total occlusions occurred in an additional 10 patients (11%). There was a trend toward an increased recurrent restenosis rate in patients with diabetes mellitus and long lesions or total occlusions (p = 0.059). Forty-eight patients (50%) received medical treatment after six months. Reinterventions were necessary in 30 patients (31%), and coronary artery bypass surgery was performed in 17 patients (18%). Event-free survival was 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Excimer laser angioplasty for in-stent restenosis was associated with a high incidence of recurrent restenosis in this group of patients, suggesting that this technique is unlikely to reduce recurrent in-stent restenosis and that other approaches are necessary.     

The pattern of restenosis and vascular remodelling after cold-end radioactive stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: Edge restenosis is a major problem after radioactive stenting. The cold-end stent has a radioactive mid-segment (15.9 mm) and non-radioactive proximal and distal 5.7 mm segments. Conceptually this may negate the impact of negative vascular remodelling at the edge of the radiation. METHOD AND RESULTS: ECG-gated intravascular ultrasound with three-dimensional reconstruction was performed post-stent implantation and at the 6-month follow-up to assess restenosis within the margins of the stent and at the stent edges in 16 patients. Angiographic restenosis was witnessed in four patients, all in the proximal in-stent position. By intravascular ultrasound in-stent neointimal hyperplasia, with a >50% stented cross-sectional area, was seen in eight patients. This was witnessed proximally (n=2), distally (n=2) and in both segments (n=4). Echolucent tissue, dubbed the 'black hole' was seen as a significant component of neointimal hyperplasia in six out of the eight cases of restenosis. Neointimal hyperplasia was inhibited in the area of radiation: Delta neointimal hyperplasia=3.72 mm3 (8.6%); in-stent at the edges of radiation proximally and distally Delta neointimal hyperplasia was 7.9 mm3 (19.0%) and 11.4 mm3 (25.6%), respectively (P=0.017). At the stent edges there was no significant change in lumen volume. CONCLUSIONS: Cold-end stenting results in increased neointimal hyperplasia in in-stent non-radioactive segments.