Heterotopic gastric mucosa in the cervical esophagus: could this play a role in the pathogenesis of laryngopharyngeal reflux in a subgroup of patients with posterior laryngitis?

OBJECTIVE: Acid secretion produced by a heterotopic gastric mucosal patch (HGMP) in the proximal esophagus, instead of gastric acid, may be responsible for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), passing the upper esophageal sphincter. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of HGMP in the proximal esophagus in patients with posterior laryngitis indicating the presence of LPR in comparison with a control group and to elucidate the possible role of this lesion in the pathogenesis of LPR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 36 consecutive patients with posterior laryngitis diagnosed on laryngoscopic examination were enrolled in the study. Esophagoscopy and ambulatory 24-h intra-esophageal dual-probe pH monitoring were performed in all patients. During endoscopy, special attention was paid to the proximal part of the esophagus, and the proximal electrode for pH monitoring was placed in this region under endoscopic view. The control group comprised 660 consecutive patients who had undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for the usual indications. When HGMP was found, biopsies were taken for histological confirmation. RESULTS: HGMP was detected in 5 out of 36 patients. One out of five patients with patches was excluded from the study because the histopathology of this patient's patch revealed antral-type mucosa, which is not capable of acid secretion. Thus a total of 35 patients were included in the study, yielding a HGMP prevalence of 11.4% (4/35). Compared with the prevalence of the control group (1.6%), a significant difference was observed (p<0.005). pH monitoring showed that 45.4% of the patients had abnormal proximal acid reflux. All of four HGMP (+) patients with posterior laryngitis revealed significantly higher abnormal proximal reflux compared to the patients without patches (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This first preliminary study may suggest that HGMP in the cervical esophagus could play a role in the pathogenesis of LPR, at least in a minor group of patients with posterior laryngitis, depending on its capability to produce acid in situ, although isolated proximal reflux could not be demonstrated. This finding may need to be supported by further studies with larger patient populations and using acid stimulation tests.     

Modified Reflux Scintigraphy Detects Pulmonary Microaspiration in Severe Gastro-Esophageal and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease

Introduction

Previously described methodologies for detecting laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) have limitations. Symptoms alone are non-diagnostic, and pH-impedance studies have poor sensitivity. Pulmonary micro-aspiration is under-recognised in LPR and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). The present study aimed to describe the results of a modified technique for scintigraphic reflux studies in two groups with severe reflux: those with typical reflux symptoms and those with laryngopharyngeal manifestations of reflux.

Methods

A prospective database of severely symptomatic, treatment-resistant reflux patients was grouped based upon predominant symptom profile of typical GERD or LPR. All patients underwent reflux scintigraphy. Results were obtained for early scintigraphic reflux contamination of the pharynx and proximal esophagus, and delayed contamination of the pharynx and lungs after 2 h.

Results

187 patients were studied (82 GERD, 105 LPR). The LPR patients were predominantly female (70.5% vs. 56.1%; p = 0.042) and older than the GERD group (median age 60 years vs. 55.5 years; p = 0.002). Early scintigraphic reflux was seen at the pharynx in 89.2% (GERD 87.7%, LPR 90.4%; p = 0.133), and at the proximal esophagus in 89.7% (GERD 88.9%, LPR 90.4%; p = 0.147). Delayed contamination of the pharynx was seen in 95.2% (GERD 93.9%, LPR 96.2%; p = 0.468). Delayed pulmonary aspiration was seen in 46% (GERD 36.6%, LPR 53.3%; p = 0.023).

Conclusion

Reflux scintigraphy demonstrated a high rate of reflux-related pulmonary aspiration. Contamination of the proximal esophagus and pharynx was observed frequently in both groups of severe disease. The likelihood of pulmonary aspiration and potential pulmonary disease needs to be entertained in severe GERD and LPR.

     

Comparison of patients of chronic laryngitis with and without troublesome reflux symptoms

Background and Aim: Little is known about the difference between patients of chronic laryngitis with and without troublesome reflux symptoms. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and response to acid suppression between patients of chronic laryngitis with and without troublesome reflux symptoms. Methods: Consecutive patients with chronic laryngitis were enrolled. The frequency and severity of reflux and laryngeal symptoms were scored. All the patients underwent laryngoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy and 24‐h multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring before receiving rabeprazole 10 mg b.i.d. for 3 months. Mild typical reflux symptoms (heartburn or regurgitation) occurring ≥ 2 days/week or moderate/severe symptoms occurring ≥ 1 day/week were defined as troublesome reflux symptoms. Results: Compared to patients without troublesome reflux symptoms, those with troublesome reflux symptoms were older and had more episodes of acid and liquid gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and acid and weakly acidic laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). They also had higher percentages of both bolus exposure time and acid exposure time of GER and LPR. Patients with troublesome reflux symptoms responded to acid suppression more often at 12 weeks (67.3% vs 20.9%, P < 0.001) and more rapidly (40.8% vs 14.0%, 3 weeks after the start of acid suppression; P = 0.004) compared to those without. Conclusion: Difference in reflux profile of GER and LPR between patients with and without troublesome reflux symptoms could partly explain the discrepancy of response to acid suppression among patients with chronic laryngitis. Acid suppression therapy may provide limited therapeutic benefits to patients of chronic laryngitis without troublesome reflux symptoms.     

Upper esophageal sphincter abnormalities and high-resolution esophageal manometry findings in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux

Background: The association between laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and abnormalities of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and esophageal motility is not clearly known. High-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) has allowed accurate measurement and evaluation of UES and esophageal function.

Goals: To evaluate the UES function and esophageal motility using HREM in patients with LPR and compare them to patients with typical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Study: All patients evaluated for GERD or LPR symptoms with esophageal function testing including HREM, ambulatory distal pH monitoring and upper endoscopy between 2006 and 2014 were retrospectively studied (n?=?220). The study group (group A, n?=?57) consisted of patients diagnosed with LPR after comprehensive evaluation. They were compared to patients who had typical GERD symptoms only (group B, n?=?98) and patients with both GERD and LPR symptoms (group C, n?=?65).

Results: Abnormalities in UES pressures and relaxation were found in about one-third of patients in all groups. There were no significant differences between the groups. Group B had higher prevalence of abnormal esophageal motility compared to others (group A vs. B vs. C?=?20.8% vs. 28% vs. 12.5%, p?=?.029). Group B patients also had higher prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus compared to others (group A vs. B vs. C?=?0% vs.12.2% vs. 4.6%, p?=?.01). Distal pH testing revealed no significant differences between the three groups.

Conclusions: Abnormal UES function was noted in one-third of patients with LPR or GERD. However, there were no abnormalities on esophageal function testing specific for LPR.     

Effect of pantoprazole in patients with chronic laryngitis and pharyngitis related to gastroesophageal reflux disease: clinical,proximal, and distal pH monitoring results

Few studies had evaluated the results of proton pump inhibitors on distal and proximal pH recording using a dual‐channel probe. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and pH‐metric effect of treatment with pantoprazole 80 mg for 8 weeks in patients with ear, nose, and throat (ENT) manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease associated with pathological proximal acid exposure. We conducted a prospective open study. Patients included had to have chronic pharyngitis or laryngitis, and a pathological gastroesophagopharyngeal reflux. All patients received treatment with pantoprazole 80 mg daily for 8 weeks. One week after the end treatment, patients had a second ENT examination and a 24‐hour pH monitoring using dual‐channel probe. We included 33 patients (11 men, 22 women). A pathological distal acid reflux was found in 30 patients (91%). After treatment, the improvement of ENT symptoms was found in 51.5% of patients. Normalization of 24‐hour proximal esophageal pH monitoring was observed in 22 patients (66%). After treatment, the overall distal acid exposure, the number of distal reflux events, and the number of reflux during more than 5 minutes were significantly decreased (respectively: 19.4% vs 7.2% [P < 0.0001], 62.7 vs 28.4 [P < 0.0001], and 10.4 vs 3.9 [P < 0.0001] ). Similarly, in proximal level, the same parameters were significantly decreased after treatment (respectively: 6.8% vs 1.6% [P < 0.0001], 32.6 vs 8.1 [P < 0.0001], and 3.4 vs 0.6 [P= 0.005] ). Treatment with pantoprazole reduced the frequency and severity of gastroesophagopharyngeal acid reflux in patients with chronic pharyngitis and laryngitis.     

Omeprazole reduces the response to capsaicin but not to methacholine in asthmatic patients with proximal reflux

Objective. To study the relationships between airway responsiveness to methacholine and capsaicin, proximal or distal reflux and the effects of short-term acid inhibition. Material and methods. Twenty-nine asthmatics, not taking steroids regularly, underwent respiratory symptom measurements, 24-h dual-probe pH monitoring, and challenges with methacholine and capsaicin. Challenges and symptom measurements were repeated after 12 days’ omeprazole treatment (20 mg b.i.d.). The results (median and range) were expressed as PD20 methacholine (mg) and PD5 capsaicin (dose causing five coughs, nmol). Results. Seventeen patients presented pathological reflux in the distal esophagus, and 17 in the proximal esophagus. At baseline no correlation was found between PD20 or PD5 and reflux. Treatment with omeprazole did not change bronchial responsiveness to methacholine (basal: 0.16 mg, 0.02–1.27; omeprazole: 0.15 mg, 0.02–1.60); omeprazole decreased the tussive response to capsaicin (basal: 0.08 nmol, 0.08–2.46; omeprazole: 0.61 nmol, 0.08–9.84, p<0.001) only in patients with pathological reflux. The decrease was positively correlated with proximal acid exposure (r²=0.70, p<0.001). Omeprazole reduced asthma symptoms in patients with proximal reflux, cough in those with proximal or distal reflux. Conclusions. In asthmatics, inhibition of gastric acid secretion does not influence bronchial hyperresponsiveness but decreases tussive sensitivity and this effect is related to proximal reflux.     

Utility of baseline impedance level measurement in patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms

Objective. Twenty-four-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) and pH monitoring is used for detecting reflux episodes in patients with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) disease. However, the clinical significance of baseline impedance levels (BILs) has not been well studied. We aimed to evaluate whether BILs are related to various reflux events or acid-related parameters and to determine whether BILs during specific intervals could be substituted for 24-h BILs. Material and methods. One-hundred forty-two patients GER symptoms underwent 24-h pH/impedance monitoring. We measured pH [(5 cm above the low esophageal sphincter (LES)] and BILs from three sites (3, 5, and 15 cm above the LES). Results. Eighty-one subjects (57.0%) were diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease, and 53 (37.3%) had acid reflux and 28 (19.7%) had nonacid reflux. The 24-h BILs at distal sites were lower in the “reflux” group than in the “no reflux” group (p < 0.001) and lower in the “acid reflux” group than in the “nonacid reflux” group (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in 24-h BILs at the proximal site among the “no reflux”, “acid reflux”, and “nonacid reflux” groups. The interclass correlation coefficient value of 24-h BILs with daytime 6-h BILs was 0.916 (95% CI 0.882–0.940) and that with nighttime 6-h BILs was 0.909 (95% CI 0.871–0.935). Conclusion. BILs are related to GER, especially acid reflux. Location and duration of assessment for BILs needs to be standardized. Six-hour BILs could be substitutes for 24-h BILs. During analysis of MII-pH, more attention should be paid to BILs in the lower esophagus.     

Role of laryngoscopy in children with respiratory complaints and suspected reflux

BackgroundIn recent years, laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in children has been taken into consideration.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the laryngoscopic findings in children diagnosed LPR and/or gastro-oesophageal reflux (GERD).MethodsThe findings of 49 patients with at least one or more respiratory complaint such as chronic cough, wheezing, hoarseness, recurrent laryngitis, and throat clearing/postnasal discharge suggesting LPR were evaluated retrospectively. The diagnosis of LPR + GERD or GERD was done by the clinical history and 24 h double-probe pH monitoring and/or scintigraphy.ResultsThirty eight out of 49 patients examined by laryngoscopy underwent 24 h double-probe pH monitoring and/or scintigraphy. Thirty of them were diagnosed as LPR + GERD or GERD by any test positivity. Twelve of 30 patients diagnosed with LPR + GERD or GERD had a positive laryngeal finding on the examination of fibre optic laryngoscopy. The most common finding with eight cases was arytenoid erythema A sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 50% for the laryngoscopy in the diagnosis of LPR/GERD were found.ConclusionIn children with unexplained respiratory symptoms, laryngopharyngeal reflux should be suspected. Therefore, until enough data on this issue in the literature accumulates, the history and the laboratory findings of the patients obtained from various techniques to document paediatric LPR should be evaluated together.     

Proximal esophageal pH-metry in patients with 'reflux laryngitis'

Fiberoptic laryngoscopic examinations were performed on 40 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, 25 of whom had persistent laryngeal symptoms (dysphonia, cough, globus sensation, frequent throat clearing, or sore throat) and 15 without laryngeal symptoms who served as disease controls. Ten patients with laryngeal symptoms but none of the controls had laryngoscopic findings consistent with reflux laryngitis. Dual-site ambulatory pH recordings were obtained with the pH electrodes spaced 15 cm apart and with the proximal sensor positioned just distal to the upper esophageal sphincter. Patients in the three groups (disease controls: group 1; patients with symptoms but without laryngoscopic findings: group 2; and patients with both laryngeal symptoms and findings: group 3) were comparable in terms of age, smoking habit, the presence of esophagitis, and distal esophageal acid exposure. Proximal esophageal acid exposure was, however, significantly increased in groups 2 and 3, and nocturnal proximal esophageal acidification occurred in over half of these patients but in none of the group 1 patients. We conclude that the subset of reflux patients who experience laryngeal symptoms show significantly more proximal esophageal acid exposure (especially nocturnally) and often have laryngoscopic findings of posterior laryngitis not observed in control reflux patients.     

The normal squamocolumnar junction is circumferentially even and minimal irregularities are manifestations of gastroesophageal acid reflux

Background: The macroscopic appearance of the normal squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) is often described as serrated with short projections of columnar mucosa that extend into the esophagus. As studies of the normal SCJ are sparse, the aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the normal SCJ is even and that irregularities are manifestations of acid reflux.

Method: Fifty asymptomatic subjects and 149 patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux disease underwent endoscopy and 48-h pH monitoring with a pH electrode positioned immediately above the SCJ. The shape of the SCJ was assessed according to the Z-line appearance classification and correlated with clinical characteristics and the degree of esophageal acid exposure in the most distal esophagus.

Results: Even SCJs without irregularities were significantly more common in asymptomatic subjects compared with patients (50% versus 10%, p?<?.001) and were never found in patients with erosive esophagitis. The median degree of distal esophageal acid exposure in individuals with an even SCJ was within normal limits. With increasing degree of irregularity of the SCJ, the frequency and duration of reflux episodes, the degree of distal esophageal acid exposure, and the prevalence of abnormal acid exposure increased progressively and significantly.

Conclusion: The shape of the normal SCJ is even and also minimal irregularities are a consequence of acid reflux, likely due to the formation of small areas of metaplastic columnar mucosa.     

Pharyngolaryngeal reflux in patients who underwent cervical esophago‐gastrostomy following esophagectomy

Pharyngolaryngeal reflux has been generally accepted as a cause for pharyngolaryngitis, hoarseness, aspiration pneumonia, chronic cough, and nocturnal asthma. Although patients who have undergone gastric conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy are at a high risk to pharyngolaryngeal reflux disease (PLRD), PLRD after esophagectomy is still unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation between reflux pharyngolaryngitis and acid reflux into the hypopharynx and into the cervical esophagus in patients who have undergone cervical esophagogastrostomy. We enrolled 62 patients who received follow‐up endoscopy and 24‐h pH monitoring after cervical esophagogastrostomy. These included 26 at 1 month after surgery and 36 at 1 year or more after surgery. We investigated: (i) the correlation between the extent of reflux pharyngolaryngitis and that of reflux esophagitis based on endoscopic findings; and (ii) the correlation between the extent of reflux pharyngolaryngitis and that of acid exposure –‘% time pH < 4’ measured by 24‐h pH monitoring – in the hypopharynx and in the cervical esophagus, and of acidity in the gastric conduit. There was no difference in acid exposure between the hypopharynx and the cervical esophagus according to time after surgery. However, the acidity in the gastric conduit was significantly more at one year or more after surgery compared with acidity at 1 month after surgery (P= 0.001). There was a significant correlation between acid exposure in the hypopharynx and that in the cervical esophagus (P < 0.001), although acid exposure in the hypopharynx was significantly less than that in the cervical esophagus (P < 0.001). A significant correlation between reflux pharyngolaryngitis and reflux esophagitis was observed (P < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between reflux pharyngolaryngitis and acid exposure in the hypopharynx (P= 0.021), and also that in the proximal esophagus (P= 0.001). The correlation between the extent of reflux pharyngolaryngitis and the acidity in the gastric conduit was not observed. These findings are consistent with pharyngolaryngitis being caused by gastro‐esophago‐pharyngolaryngeal reflux in patients after cervical esophagogastrostomy, despite the upper esophageal sphincter strongly preventing acid reflux from the cervical esophagus into the hypopharynx.     

Laryngeal disorders in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common medical condition affecting approximately 35-40% of the adult population in the western world. Chronic laryngeal signs and symptoms associated with GERD are often referred to as reflux laryngitis or laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). It is estimated that up to 15% of all visits to the otolaryngology offices are because of manifestations of LPR. Injury may occur as a result of one or chronic reflux of gastroduodenal contents directly injuring the laryngeal mucosa. Since less amount of acid is required to make the injury to the larynx as compared to injury to esophagus; it is believed that intermittent exposure to small amount of gastric content can result in laryngitis. The most common presenting symptoms of LPR include hoarseness, sore throat, throat clearing, and chronic cough. The diagnosis of LPR is usually made on the basis of presenting symptoms and associated laryngeal signs including laryngeal edema and erythema. Current recommendation for management of this group of patients is empiric therapy with twice daily proton-pump inhibitors for 2 to 4 months. In majority of those who are unresponsive to such therapy other causes of laryngeal irritation is considered. Surgical fundoplication is most effective in those who are responsive to acid suppressive therapy.     

The combination of pH monitoring in the most distal esophagus and symptom association analysis markedly improves the clinical value of esophageal pH tests

Objective: The poor sensitivity of esophageal pH monitoring substantially limits the clinical value of the test. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of esophageal pH monitoring and symptom association analysis performed at the conventional level with that obtained in the most distal esophagus. Material and methods: Eighty-two patients with typical reflux symptoms and 49 asymptomatic subjects underwent dual 48-h pH monitoring with the electrodes positioned immediately above, and 6?cm above the squamo-columnar junction (SCJ). The degree of esophageal acid exposure and the temporal relationship between reflux events and symptoms were evaluated. Results: The sensitivity of pH recording and the diagnostic yield of Symptom Association Probability (SAP) were significantly higher for pH monitoring performed at the distal compared with the conventional level (82% versus 65%, p<0.001 and 74% versus 62%, p<0.001, respectively). The greatest improvement was observed in patients with non-erosive disease. In this group, the sensitivity increased from 46% at the standard level to 66% immediately above the SCJ, and with the combination of a positive SAP as a marker for a positive pH test, the diagnostic yield further increased to 94%. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of esophageal pH monitoring in the most distal esophagus is superior to that performed at the conventional level and it is further improved with the combination of symptom association analysis. PH monitoring with the pH electrode positioned immediately above the SCJ should be introduced in clinical practice and always combined with symptom association analysis.     

Laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) has been extensively studied in patients with laryngeal signs and symptoms, gastroesophageal reflux being identified in approximately 50%. Few studies have investigated the incidence and significance of LPR in GERD patients. Two-hundred and seventy-six consecutive patients referred with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux had dual probe 24 h pH, esophageal manometry, GERD and ENT questionnaires. LPR was defined as at least three pharyngeal reflux events less than pH 5.0 with corresponding esophageal reflux, but excluding meal periods. Fourty-two percent of patients were positive for LPR on 24 h pH monitoring and 91.3% corresponded with an abnormal esophageal acid score. Distal esophageal acid exposure was significantly greater (P < 0.001) in patients with LPR but symptoms of GERD and regurgitation scores showed no significant differences between patients with positive and negative LPR on 24 h pH. There was no significant difference between the incidence of LPR in patients with or without laryngeal symptoms. There is a high incidence of LPR in patients with GERD but its significance for laryngeal symptoms is tenuous. Fixed distance dual probe pH monitoring allows documentation of conventional esophageal reflux and LPR.     

Lack of significant proximal esophageal acid reflux in infants presenting with respiratory symptoms

The effects of proximal esophageal acid reflux on upper and lower respiratory tract symptoms in infants with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) remain controversial. We studied 116 infants with either respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms to determine whether acid reflux in the proximal esophagus plays an etiologic role in the elicitation of respiratory symptoms in comparison to causing gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms only. Sixty-two infants (age range, 1-12 months) with respiratory symptoms suggestive of GER and 54 infants with gastrointestinal symptoms only (age range, 1-10 months) were evaluated with dual level esophageal pH monitoring. Mean duration of dual-level pH monitoring in infants with respiratory symptoms was 20.4 h, and in those with GI symptoms was 20.7 h. Seventeen of 54 infants with GI symptoms only and 16 of 63 infants with respiratory symptoms had abnormal distal esophageal acid reflux indices (i.e., pH <4.0 for >5% of the duration of study). In infants with abnormal distal pH monitoring, the median proximal acid reflux index in the GI group was 4.0% in comparison to 0.95% in the respiratory group (P < 0.01 by Wilcoxon rank sum W test). Values for other reflux parameters were also higher in the GI than in the respiratory group. We conclude that reflux-associated respiratory symptoms are more likely due to mechanisms other than the mere presence of refluxed acid in the proximal esophagus.     

Validation of a new method of measuring esophageal acid exposure: comparison with 24-hour pH monitoring

Recently, we developed a disposable acid exposure sensor whose in vitro response to acid below pH 4 is linearly determined by the duration of exposure and the degree of acidity. The aim of the present study was to compare the SR to simultaneous esophageal pH and duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER) monitoring (Bilitec) in patients investigated for presumed gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Twenty-six patients (16 men, mean age 46 ± 2 years) with symptoms suggestive of GERD underwent 24-hr ambulatory pH monitoring and SR monitoring at 5 cm proximal to the LES. DGER monitoring was performed in 21 patients. Exposure of the esophagus to acid and to DGER were analyzed. These data were compared to SR. A significant correlation was found between the exposure of the distal esophagus to acid and SR (R = 0.85; P < 0.0001). Similarly, the area below a cutoff pH 4 was significantly correlated to SR (r = 0.81; P < 0.0001). SR was not correlated to DGER (r = 0.16; NS). At a cutoff of 50, the sensitivity and specificity of SR to predict esophageal acid exposure >5% of time were 91% and 93%, respectively conclusion, the response of the acid exposure sensor is strongly correlated with the results of simultaneous esophageal pH monitoring. The sensor seems able to reliably predict pathological esophageal acid exposure. These findings warrant larger studies of the clinical potential of the acid exposure sensor in the diagnosis and quantification of GERD.     

Females without reflux symptoms or gastroesophageal reflux disease have less distal esophageal acid exposure than males without reflux symptoms or gastroesophageal reflux disease

Ambulatory 24‐hour esophageal pH monitoring is the gold standard examination to assess esophageal acid exposure. Gender‐related variation is a well‐recognized physiologic phenomenon in health and disease. To date, limited gender‐specific 24‐hour esophageal pH monitoring data are available. The aim of this study was to obtain values of esophageal pH monitoring in males and females without reflux symptoms or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) to determine if gender variation exists in esophageal acid exposure among individuals without these factors. Twenty‐four‐hour dual esophageal pH monitoring was performed in male and female volunteers without reflux symptoms or GERD. Values for total number of reflux episodes, episodes longer than 5 minutes, total reflux time in minutes, % time with pH below 4, and longest reflux episode in the proximal/distal esophagus were obtained and recorded for both groups. The distal channel was placed 5 cm and proximal channel 15 cm above the manometrically determined lower esophageal sphincter. Means were compared using an independent sample t‐test. Sixty‐seven males and 69 females were enrolled. All subjects completed esophageal 24‐hour pH monitoring without difficulty. There was no age or body mass difference between groups. Females had significantly fewer reflux episodes at both esophageal measuring sites and, significantly less total reflux time and % time with pH below 4 in the distal esophagus than males. All other parameters were similar. Significant gender‐related differences exist in esophageal acid exposure, especially in the distal esophagus in individuals without reflux symptoms or GERD. These differences underscore the need for gender‐specific reference values for 24‐hour pH monitoring, allowing for an accurate evaluation of esophageal acid exposure in symptomatic patients.     

Diagnostic yield of oesophageal pH monitoring in patients with chronic unexplained cough

Objective. One of the main causes of persistent cough is gastro-oesophageal reflux. In these patients, excessive oesophageal acid exposure and/or a temporal association between gastro-oesophageal reflux and cough can be demonstrated during 24-h pH monitoring. Impedance pH monitoring may have a higher yield than pH monitoring alone, but this technique is not yet widely available. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic yield of ambulatory 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring for the evaluation of chronic unexplained cough. Material and methods. Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring studies were analysed in 55 patients with chronic cough. In 14 of these studies concurrent ambulatory pressure monitoring was done. A cough episode was considered to be related to reflux if the cough occurred within two minutes after the onset of the reflux episode (“reflux–cough sequence”). Temporal relationships between cough and reflux were expressed by using the symptom association probability (SAP). Results. Thirty-seven patients actually coughed during the 24-h study. Eleven patients (20%) had a positive SAP for the reflux–cough sequence. In 5 patients, reflux followed coughing. Pathological oesophageal acid exposure was found in 15 subjects. Interestingly, only a minority (39.2%) of the cough bursts detected manometrically were marked by patients who had undergone both combined 24-h pH and pressure recording. Conclusions. This study shows that, in a routine clinical setting, combined 24-h pH and pressure monitoring is useful in the evaluation of patients with chronic unexplained cough, as positive findings are not infrequently found and have diagnostic and therapeutic consequences.     

Time pattern of gastric acidity in Barrett's esophagus

Increased gastroesophageal acid reflux is frequently found in patients with Barrett's esophagus, and it has been hypothesized that gastric acid hypersecretion could be an important factor aggravating the exposure of esophageal mucosa to acid and then contributing to the development of this disorder. The aim of the present study was to assess whether the circadian pattern of gastric acidity differs between refluxer patients with and without Barrett's esophagus and normal subjects. Continuous 24-hr gastric pH monitoring was performed in 119 healthy volunteers, 20 patients with Barrett's esophagus, 37 patients with moderate and 10 patients with severe reflux esophagitis without Barrett's esophagus. In all these diseases the final diagnosis was ascertained by means of endoscopy plus biopsy. There was no difference in the 24-hr and daytime patterns of gastric pH between healthy subjects and patients with Barrett's esophagus, while nocturnal acidity was significantly lower (P<0.05) in the latter population. Gastric acidity, in contrast, was higher (P<0.05) in controls than in patients with both moderate and severe reflux esophagitis without Barrett's esophagus during the whole 24-hr period. There was no difference between refluxer patients with and without Barrett's esophagus in any of the three time intervals we analyzed. Because normal subjects had lower gastric pH than patients with Barrett's esophagus during the night and than patients with reflux esophagitis during the whole 24-hr period, gastric hyperacidity is not a relevant factor in the development of both metaplastic columnar epithelium and inflammatory changes in the distal esophagus, and other pathophysiological mechanisms are involved in these histological alterations.     

Esophageal motility and 24-h pH profiles of patients with heterotopic gastric mucosa in the cervical esophagus

BackgroundHeterotopic gastric mucosa occurs as a flat island of red mucosa in the proximal third of the esophagus where it gives rise to the cervical inlet patch. The aims of this study were to investigate the esophageal motility pattern and 24-h pH profiles of patients with cervical inlet patch.MethodsThirty patients (16 women, mean age: 44.9 years, range: 23–72) diagnosed as having heterotopic gastric mucosa in the cervical esophagus with upper gastrointestinal symptoms had undergone esophageal motility testing and 24-h pH monitorisation with a double-channel pH probe.ResultsManometric investigation was abnormal in 7 patients (non-specific esophageal motor disorder in 4 patients, esophageal hypomotility in 1 patient, and hypotensive LES in 2 patients). Pathological acid reflux (pH < 4) was found in 9 (30%) of 30 heterotopic gastric mucosa patients during pH monitorisation from the distal probe. Pathological acid reflux in the proximal esophagus (percentage of total time of pH < 4) was seen in four of these nine patients. Only four of the 30 patients (13.3%) presented with “acid independent episodes” during the 24-h esophageal pH monitorisation.ConclusionManometric investigation and 24-h pH monitorisation revealed that some of the patients with HGM have signs of esophageal motor dysfunction and “acid independent episodes” from the patches. These abnormalities may be responsible for some of the symptoms of HGM patients.