Lactose malabsorption and intolerance in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Lactase activity declines with age in rats, but it is not clear whether this model is also shared by humans. Few studies have evaluated lactose intolerance and malabsorption in the elderly and no definite conclusions can be drawn. The aim of our study was therefore to verify the impact of age on lactose intolerance and malabsorption. METHODS: Eighty-four healthy subjects took part in the study. Thirty-three were <65 years, 17 were between 65 and 74 years and 34 were >74 years. All the subjects underwent a preliminary evaluation of intestinal gas production capacity and oro-cecal transit time by H2/CH4 breath test after lactulose. After a 3-day period, an H2/CH4 breath test after lactose was performed. The occurrence of intolerance symptoms during the test and in the 24 h after the test was recorded. RESULTS: Breath H2 and CH4 excretion parameters at fasting and after lactulose did not differ between the three groups. Cumulative breath H2 excretion after lactose was higher in subjects >74 years than in subjects <65 years and in subjects aged 65-74 years, while no difference was found between the latter two groups. In subjects >74 years, the prevalence of lactose malabsorption was higher than in the other two groups, while no significant difference was observed between subjects <65 years and subjects aged 65-74 years. Within the malabsorber subjects, the prevalence of lactose intolerance was higher in subjects <65 years than in those aged 65-74 years and in those aged >74 years. No significant difference was found between the latter two groups. No difference was found between the three groups in terms of daily calcium intake and a significant negative correlation between symptom score and daily calcium intake was only found in the group of subjects aged <65 years. CONCLUSIONS: As age increases, the prevalence of lactose malabsorption shows an increase while the prevalence of intolerance symptoms among malabsorbers shows a decrease. Accordingly, daily calcium intake was similar among the adults and elderly studied.     

Breath testing to evaluate lactose intolerance in irritable bowel syndrome correlates with lactulose testing and may not reflect true lactose malabsorption

OBJECTIVES: An increased prevalence of lactose intolerance is seen in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Recently, we demonstrated a high prevalence of abnormal lactulose breath test results in IBS suggesting bacterial overgrowth. Because symptoms of lactose intolerance result from bacterial fermentation, the purpose of this study was to determine whether an abnormal lactose breath test is reflective of malabsorption or early presentation to bacteria. METHODS: Subjects with diarrhea-predominant IBS were enrolled. On day 1, subjects underwent a lactulose breath test after an overnight fast. Within 1 wk, subjects returned after fasting for a lactose breath test with simultaneous blood glucose measurements every 15 min to complete a lactose tolerance test (LTT). Symptoms were evaluated 3 h after lactose administration. RESULTS: Twenty subjects completed the study. One subject inadvertently received dextrose through the intravenous and was excluded. Of the remaining 19 subjects, three (16%) had an abnormal LTT suggesting malabsorption. In all, 10 subjects (53%) had an abnormal lactose breath test, 14 (74%) had an abnormal lactulose breath test, and 11 (58%) had symptoms after lactose administration. The agreement with symptoms was moderate (kappa = 0.47) and fair (kappa = 0.24) when compared to the lactose breath test and LTT, respectively. There was a fair correlation between lactose breath test and LTT (kappa = 0.29). However, lactose breath test hydrogen levels >166 ppm were universally predictive of abnormal LTT. Finally, a significant correlation was seen between the hydrogen production on lactose and lactulose breath test (r = 0.56, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Lactose breath testing in IBS subjects does not seem to reflect malabsorption; it may be an indicator of abnormal lactulose breath test, suggesting bacterial overgrowth.     

Lactose malabsorption and intolerance: What should be the best clinical management?

Lactose malabsorption (LM) is the incomplete hydrolysis of lactose due to lactase deficiency, which may occur as a primary disorder or secondary to other intestinal diseases. Primary adult-type hypolactasia is an autosomal recessive condition resulting from the physiological decline of lactase activity. Different methods have been used to diagnose LM. Lactose breath test represents the most reliable technique. A recent consensus conference has proposed the more physiological dosage of 25 g of lactose and a standardized procedure for breath testing. Recently a new genetic test, based on C/T13910 polymorphism, has been proposed for the diagnosis of adult-type hypolactasia, complementing the role of breath testing. LM represents a wellknown cause of abdominal symptoms although only some lactose malabsorbers are also intolerants. Diagnosing lactose intolerance is not straightforward. Many non-malabsorber subjects diagnose themselves as being lactose intolerant. Blind lactose challenge studies should be recommended to obtain objective results. Besides several studies indicate that subjects with lactose intolerance can ingest up to 15 g of lactose with no or minor symptoms. Therefore a therapeutic strategy consists of a lactose restricted diet avoiding the nutritional disadvantages of reduced calcium and vitamin intake. Various pharmacological options are also available. Unfortunately there is insufficient evidence that these therapies are effective. Further double-blind studies are needed to demonstrate treatment effectiveness in lactose intolerance.     

Concordance of indirect methods for the detection of lactose malabsorption in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects

In order to collect data on (1) the prevalence of lactose malabsorption and (2) the value of indirect diagnostic methods for hypolactasia in diabetics, we compared lactose tolerance tests using serum glucose, serum galactose (after oral ethanol intake) and breath hydrogen excretion as diagnostic cutoff in 144 nondiabetic and 46 diabetic subjects. A good rate of concordance was found for the hydrogen breath test and galactose-dependent lactose tolerance test. The glucose-dependent lactose tolerance test was found to be of satisfactory diagnostic value in nondiabetic subjects and was useless for diagnostic purposes in diabetics. Lactose malabsorption was no more frequent in diabetics than in controls and lactose intolerance was found to be less frequent in the diabetic group. A distinction between hypolactasia and other gastrointestinal disorders in diabetics is possible by ambulatory indirect tests.     

Development, Validation, and Applicability of a Symptoms Questionnaire for Lactose Malabsorption Screening

Lactase deficiency has a high prevalence worldwide. Thus, a valid symptom scale would be a useful tool for identifying patients with lactose malabsorption. Objective To develop, validate, and apply a symptoms questionnaire on lactose malabsorption to identify lactose malabsorbers diagnosed with the gold-standard hydrogen breath test. Methods In the first part of the study, 292 patients completed a questionnaire at the end of a 50-g lactose breath test. The questionnaire included five items (diarrhea, abdominal cramping, vomiting, audible bowel sounds, and flatulence or gas) scored on a 10-cm visual analogue scale. In the second part of the study, 171 patients completed the questionnaire twice: first, according to their opinion when consuming dairy products at home and second, after a 50-g lactose breath test. Patients were grouped as absorbers or malabsorbers according to the result of the breath test. Results Diarrhea, abdominal cramping, and flatulence were scored significantly higher in malabsorbers than in absorbers. Total score of the symptomatic questionnaire was significantly higher in malabsorbers (17.5 versus 3.0, P < 0.01). According to receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis, the most discriminant cut-off of the total score to identify lactose malabsorption was 6.5 (sensitivity 0.75, specificity 0.67). In 58 malabsorbers the effect size of the questionnaire to determine sensitivity to change was 1.32. In the second part of the study, scoring of the home questionnaire was higher than after the lactose-breath test. The lactose malabsorbers rate was higher according to the home questionnaire than after the lactose breath test (72% versus 52%). The home questionnaire had excellent sensitivity (0.82) but low specificity (0.35). Conclusion We developed and validated a five-item symptoms questionnaire for lactose malabsorption. This is a valid test that permits patients with a total score lower than 7 to be excluded from future studies.     

Lactose malabsorption and intolerance and peak bone mass

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Lactose malabsorption per se is not associated with alterations of bone mineral density (BMD) or calcium intake, but when intolerance symptoms are present a lower calcium intake and reduction of BMD values are evident. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether lactose intolerance interferes with the achievement of an adequate peak bone mass in young adults. METHODS: Of 103 enrolled healthy subjects, 55 proved to be lactose malabsorbers with H(2) breath test after lactose administration, and 29 of them experienced intolerance symptoms (diarrhea, abdominal pain, bloating, flatulence). Lumbar and femoral BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was measured, and calcium intake and biochemical indices of bone and mineral metabolism were evaluated. RESULTS: Lumbar and femoral BMD, calcium intake, and mineral metabolism did not differ between malabsorbers and absorbers, although among malabsorbers, intolerant subjects showed significant alterations of all these parameters in comparison with tolerant subjects. A strict correlation was evident between BMD values and both severity of symptoms and calcium intake and between calcium intake and severity of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Lactose intolerance prevents the achievement of an adequate peak bone mass and may, therefore, predispose to severe osteoporosis.     

Breath hydrogen excretion after lactose and whole milk ingestion. A prospective comparison in lactase deficiency

As the 50 g of lactose in the usual clinical test is unphysiologic both because it is equivalent to 1 L milk and because the usual dietary intake is not the purified sugar, but milk, we undertook a prospective comparison of the absorption of lactose after both lactose and milk ingestion with an equivalent lactose content. We studied 51 healthy volunteers, using the hydrogen breath test technique. All patients received 25 g lactose in aqueous solution. Subjects with an abnormal test had the test repeated with 500 ml whole cow's milk, whereas subjects with a normal test repeated the test after ingesting the unabsorbable sugar lactulose to detect the capacity of their colonic flora to produce the gas. Symptoms of gastrointestinal intolerance were also recorded. Compared to an equivalent lactose amount, milk lactose is better absorbed (8% of the entire population malabsorbed 500 ml whole milk, whereas 33.33% malabsorbed 25 g lactose) and induces intolerance in fewer subjects. We conclude that milk rather than pure lactose must be used in clinical evaluation of lactose malabsorption and intolerance.     

Lactase deficiency and lactose intolerance-related symptoms in adult healthy subjects from western France]

The prevalence of lactase deficiency (LD) and lactose intolerance is not well known in France. Using breath hydrogen and methane analysis after 50 g oral lactose load, we investigated the prevalences of LD, lactose intolerance, and methane producer status in 102 healthy adults born in western France, and we examined the relationships between these parameters and the daily milk consumption. In 10 subjects with LD and lactose intolerance, we studied the reproducibility of the lactose hydrogen breath test results for the diagnosis of LD and lactose intolerance and estimated the quantity of lactose malabsorbed in comparison with the lactulose hydrogen breath test. The prevalence of LD was 23.4 percent and symptoms of lactose intolerance were observed in 50 percent of the 24 subjects with LD. The daily milk consumption was not significantly different in the 24 subjects with LD and in the 78 subjects without LD (281 +/- 197 vs 303 +/- 217 ml/24 h). The prevalence of methane producer status was 42.1 percent. The symptomatic group of lactose malabsorbers (n = 12) was characterized by a shorter lactose mouth to caecum transit time (39 +/- 20 vs 88 +/- 48 min; P less than 0.05), and more marked hydrogen production (6.1 +/- 2.3 vs 3.4 +/- 2.4 10(3) ppm.min; P less than 0.04). In the 10 subjects with LD and lactose intolerance, the hydrogen breath test was reproducible for diagnosis of LD and lactose intolerance, and for hydrogen production. The quantity of lactose malabsorbed was 60 percent. In France, symptoms of lactose intolerance are not severe and do not affect the daily consumption of milk and dairy products.     

Fructose and Sorbitol Malabsorption in Ambulatory Patients with Functional Dyspepsia Comparison with Lactose Maldigestion/Malabsorption

The aim of this study was to study sugarmaldigestion/malabsorption in patients with functionaldyspepsia using H breath testing. End-expiratory breathH after separate 2 challenges with lactose (25 g), fructose (25 g), and sorbitol (5 g) were usedto determine malabsorption, as well as small boweltransit time (SBTT). Five hundred twenty patients withfunctional dyspepsia received all three challenges. Smaller groups were also tested after lactulose(10 g, N = 36) and glucose (50 g, N = 90) challenges.Fructose and sorbitol were closely linked with respectto absorption and malabsorption status. Only in the case of lactose maldigestion/malabsorption wasthere a greater than random prevalence of malabsorption(P < 0.001) for fructose and sorbitol. In contrast tolactose, ethnic origin did not influence fructose or sorbitol malabsorption, and femalespredominated among fructose and sorbitol malabsorbers.In Jews, the prevalence of lactosemaldigestion/malabsorption decreased in the age group of25-55 and subsequently rose after 55, while fructose and sorbitolmalabsorption decreased progressively with advancingage. With respect to small bowel transit time (SBTT), inthe case of sorbitol and lactulose, it was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than those for fructoseand lactose. Multiple sugar malabsorptions are commonwhen lactose maldigestion/malabsorption ispresent.     

Hydrogen breath test for the diagnosis of lactose intolerance, is the routine sugar load the best one？

AIM： To evaluate the prevalence of lactose intolerance （LI） following a load of 12.5 g in patients diagnosed as high-grade malabsorbers using the hydrogen breath test （HBT）-25. METHODS： Ninety patients showing high-grade malabsorption at HBT-25 were submitted to a second HBT with a lactose load of 12.5 g. Peak hydrogen production, area under the curve of hydrogen excretion and occurrence of symptoms were recorded. RESULTS： Only 16 patients （17.77%） with positive HBT-25 proved positive at HBT-12.5. Hydrogen production was lower as compared to HBT-25 （peak value 21.55 parts per million （ppm） ± 29.54 SD vs 99.43 ppm ± 40.01 SD; P 〈 0.001）. Symptoms were present in only 13 patients. The absence of symptoms during the high-dose test has a high negative predictive value （0.84） for a negative low-dose test. The presence of symptoms during the first test was not useful for predicting a positive low-dose test （positive predictive value 0.06-0.31）. CONCLUSION： Most patients with a positive HBT-25 normally absorb a lower dose of lactose and a strict lactose restriction on the basis of a ＂standard＂ HBT is, in most instances, unnecessary. Thus, the 25 g lactose tolerance test should probably be substituted by the 12.5 g test in the diagnosis of LI, and in providing dietary guidelines to patients with suspected lactose malabsorption/intolerance.     

Lactose malabsorption, irritable bowel syndrome and self-reported milk intolerance

BACKGROUND: The relationship between lactose malabsorption, irritable bowel syndrome and development of intestinal symptoms is unclear, especially when the ingested dose of milk is small. Thus, the role of hydrogen breath testing in the diagnostic work-up of patients with nonspecific intestinal symptoms is still debated. AIMS: To establish the relationship between lactose malabsorption, severe self-reported milk intolerance, irritable bowel syndrome and related symptoms. METHODS: The prevalence of lactose malabsorption was prospectively assessed by means of a hydrogen breath test in 839 patients (503 with irritable bowel syndrome, based on the Rome criteria, regularly consuming milk, and 336 subjects who identified themself as milk intolerant, after an oral load of 25 g lactose). The test was considered "positive" when a hydrogen peak exceeding 20 ppm over baseline values was observed in two or more samples. Attempts were also made to establish whether the predominant presenting symptom (diarrhoea, constipation, alternating diarrhoea and constipation, pain and gaseousness) might be helpful in predicting the outcome of the breath test. RESULTS: The prevalence of a positive breath test was comparable in the two groups (337 patients with irritable bowel syndrome (66.9%) vs 240 patients with milk intolerance (71.4%)). The same holds true for the first peak of hydrogen excretion, total hydrogen output and prevalence of symptoms during, and in the four hours after, the test. The predominant presenting symptom was not useful for predicting outcome of the test either in regular milk users or in milk intolerant subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The almost identical results of the lactose breath test of patients with irritable bowel syndrome and subjects with self-reported milk intolerance suggests that the two conditions overlap to such an extent that the clinical approach should be the same. A lactose breath test should always be included in the diagnostic work-up for irritable bowel syndrome, as fermentation of malabsorbed lactose is likely responsible for triggering symptoms. Conversely, lactase deficiency is probably irrelevant in most subjects not affected by irritable bowel syndrome, within a moderate milk consumption.     

Lactose intolerance: a risk factor for reduced bone mineral density and vertebral fractures?

Background: The purpose of the present study was to determine differences, if any, in bone mineral density, the risk of fracture, and clinical behavior in patients with lactose intolerance investigated by hydrogen breath test. Methods: The study population (n = 218; age, mean ± SD, 58.2 ± 11.5 years) consisted of 103 healthy individuals negative hydrogen breath test (ΔH2 0–20 ppm; group I), and 115 individuals with evidence of lactose intolerance according to the hydrogen breath test (ΔH2 > 20 ppm), of whom 40 individuals had test results of 20 ppm < ΔH2 < 59 ppm (group II). The remaining 75 individuals were strongly positive on the hydrogen breath test (ΔH2 > 60 ppm; group III). The entire study population was measured for bone mineral density in the nondominant forearm and in the vertebra (quantitative computed tomography [qCT]). Radiographs of the spine were studied for fractures. Results: In healthy individuals, bone mineral density in the vertebra assessed by qCT (mean ± SD, 111.2 ± 31 mg/cc) did not significantly differ between those with mild (qCT, mean ± SD, 109.8 ± 35 mg/cc) and those with severe (qCT, mean ± SD, 107.7 ± 36 mg/cc) lactose intolerance. Lactose-intolerant individuals had more vertebral fractures per patient when compared with those with mild lactose intolerance or controls (P < 0.05). Considering vertebral and self-reported nonvertebral fractures, no statistically significant differences were found. In the entire group, the overall occurrences of fracture in the presence of lactose intolerance and in controls were comparable after correction for age and body mass index (BMI). Conclusions: Individuals with lactose intolerance verified by the hydrogen breath test appear not to be at risk for accelerated bone loss. Nevertheless, a relationship between vertebral fractures and an apparent lactose intolerance cannot be excluded, as a few individuals with severe lactose intolerance had a large number of vertebral fractures. Received: December 13, 2001 / Accepted: May 17, 2002     

Four-sample lactose hydrogen breath test for diagnosis of lactose malabsorption in irritable bowel syndrome patients with diarrhea

AIM: To validate 4-sample lactose hydrogen breath testing (4SLHBT) compared to standard 13-sample LHBT in the clinical setting.METHODS: Irritable bowel syndrome patients with diarrhea (IBS-D) and healthy volunteers (HVs) were enrolled and received a 10 g, 20 g, or 40 g dose lactose hydrogen breath test (LHBT) in a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial. The lactase gene promoter region was sequenced. Breath samples and symptoms were acquired at baseline and every 15 min for 3 h (13 measurements). The detection rates of lactose malabsorption (LM) and lactose intolerance (LI) for a 4SLHBT that acquired four measurements at 0, 90, 120, and 180 min from the same data set were compared with the results of standard LHBT.RESULTS: Sixty IBS-D patients and 60 HVs were studied. The genotype in all participants was C/C-13910. LM and LI detection rates increased with lactose dose from 10 g, 20 g to 40 g in both groups (P < 0.001). 4SLHBT showed excellent diagnostic concordance with standard LHBT (97%-100%, Kappa​​ 0.815-0.942) with high sensitivity (90%-100%) and specificity (100%) at all three lactose doses in both groups.CONCLUSION: Reducing the number of measurements from 13 to 4 samples did not significantly impact on the accuracy of LHBT in health and IBS-D. 4SLHBT is a valid test for assessment of LM and LI in clinical practice.     

Effect of Predominant Methanogenic Flora on Outcome of Lactose Hydrogen Breath Test in Controls and Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients of North India

The relationship between methanogenic flora and hydrogen (H₂) production is considered to be a possible confounding factor in the interpretation of hydrogen breath tests (H₂BT). Therefore, the present study was conducted prospectively and included 154 IBS patients (fulfilling Rome II criteria) and 286 age-and-sex-matched apparently healthy controls. Each subject underwent H₂BT after overnight fasting using 25 g lactose. Methane and H₂ were measured using an SC Microlyser from Quintron, USA, at baseline and every 30 min for a total of 4 h. Subjects with fasting methane concentration <10 ppm were labeled as low methane producers (LMP) and >10 ppm as predominant methane producers (PMP). A rise >20 ppm over base line in hydrogen concentration was taken as +ve hydrogen breath test. IBS and control groups included 66.78% and 67.53% males, respectively. Mean age in the two groups were 48.52 ± 30.54 years (range 15–68 years) and 45.67 ± 30.54 years (range 15–78 years), respectively. Hydrogen breath test was +ve in 77/154 (50%) IBS patients and in 142/286 (49.65%) in controls (P > 0.05). It was also observed that the hydrogen breath test was −ve due to PMP in 5/77 (6.49%) of IBS patients and in 29/154 (20.14%) in controls. PMP affected lactose hydrogen breath tests in 6.49–20.14% subjects. This effect is more apparent in apparently healthy subjects as compared to patients with IBS.     

Breath hydrogen response to lactulose in healthy subjects: relationship to methane producing status.

In order to assess the relationship between methane (CH4) producing status and the breath excretion of hydrogen (H2) in healthy subjects, breath CH4 and H2 were simultaneously measured for 14 hours after oral ingestion of 10 g lactulose in 65 young volunteers. Forty were breath CH4 producers and 25 were not. Statistically significant differences were observed between both groups, with lower values for CH4 producers recorded for the following parameters: fasting basal value of breath H2 (8.1 (4.9) v 5.2 (3.7) ppm, p less than 0.05), mouth-to-caecum transit time (68 (24) v 111 (52) min, p less than 0.005), and breath H2 production measured as area under the curve 13.1 (6.9) v 8.8 (3.8) 10(3) ppm/min, p less than 0.02). There was no significant correlation between individual production of breath H2 and CH4. These results indicate that the response to lactulose depends on breath CH4 producing status. In clinical practice, defining normal values of mouth-to-caecum transit time without knowledge of breath CH4 producing status may lead to misinterpretation of the H2 breath test.     

Lack of effect of lactose digestion status on baseline fecal microflora

BACKGROUND:

The genetics of intestinal lactase divide the world’s population into two phenotypes: the ability (a dominant trait) or inability (a recessive trait) to digest lactose. A prebiotic effect of lactose may impact the colonic flora of these phenotypes differently.

OBJECTIVE:

To detect and evaluate the effects of lactose on subjects divided according to their ability to digest lactose.

METHODS:

A total of 57 healthy maldigesters (n=30) and digesters (n=27) completed diet questionnaires, genetic and breath hydrogen testing, and quantitative stool analysis for species of bacteria. Log₁₀ transformation of bacterial counts was compared with lactose intake in both groups using multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS:

There was a significant relationship between genetic and breath hydrogen tests. Daily lactose intake was marginally lower in lactose maldigesters (median [interquartile range] 12.2 g [31 g] versus 15 g [29.6 g], respectively). There was no relationship between lactose intake and breath hydrogen tests in either group. There were no differences in bacterial counts between the two groups, nor was there a relationship between bacterial counts and lactose intake in either group.

CONCLUSION:

The differential bacterial effects of lactose were not quantitatively detected in stool samples taken in the present study.     

Lactose malabsorption and rate of bone loss in older women.

OBJECTIVES: to study the prevalence of lactose malabsorption with increasing age and to determine whether lactose malabsorbers consume less dietary calcium, have lower bone mineral density or display faster bone loss than lactose absorbers. DESIGN: 80 healthy Caucasian women aged 40-79 years (20 per decade) were studied for 1 year. METHODS: breath hydrogen exhalation was measured for 3 after a 50 g oral lactose challenge. Bone density was assessed in the radius, femoral neck, lumbar spine and total body by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and dietary calcium intake was estimated by 4-day diet records and food-frequency questionnaires. RESULTS: lactose malabsorption rose with age (15% in those aged 40-59 years versus 50% in those aged 60-79; P < 0.01). Malabsorbers aged 70-79 years consumed significantly less calcium than lactose absorbers of this age (P < 0.05). Baseline total body calcium values were lower in lactose malabsorbers (n=26) than in lactose absorbers (n=54) but age-adjustment eliminated this difference. Bone change (% per year) was correlated with dietary calcium intake at the femoral neck and trochanter (P < 0.05) but was not statistically greater in malabsorbers than in absorbers. CONCLUSIONS: the ability to absorb lactose declines in the 7th decade. This may contribute to decreased dietary intakes of milk products and calcium in elderly women. However, lactose malabsorption without reduction in calcium intake has little effect on bone mineral density or the rate of bone loss.     

Breath hydrogen test to evaluate lactose absorption and small bowel bacterial overgrowth in children

The aim of this study was to determine the lactose absorption capacity and possible existence of bacterial overgrowth in the small bowel in asymptomatic school children of low social economic level in Marilia, a city located in the interior of S?o Paulo state. Eighty three children aging 7 to 15 years old without any gastrointestinal manifestations at least 30 days prior to the tests were studied. All the patients had fasted for at least 8 hours before the tests were performed. Lactose absorption was evaluated by breath hidrogen test after an overload of lactose 18 g in 10% aquous solution. Lactose intolerance was determined by the occurrence of clinical symptoms, such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, flatulence, etc in the following 24 hours after the test was performed. Bacterial overgrowth was evaluated by the breath hidrogen test after a 10 g lactulose load in aqueous solution. Lactose malabsorption was detected in 19 (22.9%) children and lactose intolerance was observed in 10 (12%) children. Lactose intolerance was more frequently observed in children who showed lactose malabsorption (6/19; 31.6%) than in those who presented a normal test (4/64; 6.3%) (P = 0.008). Bacterial overgrowth was detected in six (7.2%) children and showed no statistical relationship with lactose malabsorption. Ontogenetic lactose malabsorption verified in this group of school children is similar to the reported for Caucasian populations. Presence of bacterial overgrowth confirms the existence of asymptomatic environmental enteropathy in children of low social economic level.     

Rifaximin in patients with lactose intolerance

BACKGROUND: Abdominal symptoms linked to lactose malabsorption may be caused by metabolic activity of colonic bacteria. Rifaximin, a non-absorbable rifampycin derivative, is active against colonic bacteria, it may be useful in the treatment of lactose intolerance. AIM: The aim of this study has been to evaluate short-term rifaximin therapy in patients with lactose intolerance. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with lactose intolerance diagnosed using the hydrogen lactose breath test were studied. Fourteen patients received rifaximin 800 mg/day for 10 days, 13 patients followed a diet without milk for 40 days and 5 patients received a placebo for 10 days. Total breath H(2) excretion expressed as area under the curve, and the symptom score were evaluated in all patients at the start, and subsequently after 10 and 40 days. RESULTS: In the 14 patients who received rifaximin for 10 days, area under the curve at day 10 and day 40 was statistically significantly lower than the one computed at basal (P<0.01). Diet reduced area under the curve progressively reaching statistical significance at day 40, while the placebo did not change area under the curve throughout the study. The total symptom score significantly improved after rifaximin and diet. CONCLUSION: In patients with lactose intolerance, a 10-day therapy with rifaximin as well as 40-day diet without lactose reduces the area under the curve and the symptom score.     

Agreement between indirect calorimetry and traditional tests of lactose malabsorption

BackgroundLactose malabsorption occurs frequently and the variable consequent intolerance may seriously impair quality of life. No reliable and convenient test method is in routine clinical practice. A recent animal study showed that the respiratory quotient changed significantly after ingestion of sucrose and lactose in naturally lactase-deficient rats.AimsThis exploratory study evaluated the relevance of monitoring the respiratory quotient after lactose ingestion to detect malabsorption.MethodsHealthy volunteers were identified and classified lactose absorbers and malabsorbers by a lactose tolerance test (25 g). After an overnight fast, a second lactose challenge was performed to monitor hydrogen excretion and respiratory quotient kinetics over 4 h. Participants also completed questionnaires to score and localise their gastrointestinal symptoms.Results20 subjects were enrolled (10 per group, 60% males, mean age 34 ± 4 years). Respiratory quotient kinetics were different between absorbers and malabsorbers during the first 100 min after lactose ingestion (p < 0.01) and during the initial 30–50 min period. Respiratory quotient was significantly, positively correlated to peak glycaemia (R = 0.74) and negatively correlated to hydrogen excretion (R = ?0.51) and symptoms score (R = ?0.46).ConclusionsIndirect calorimetry could improve the reliability of lactose malabsorption diagnosis. Studies on larger populations are needed to confirm the validity of this test and propose a simplified measurement.