Postoperative Pain Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common surgeries performed to relieve joint pain in patients with end‐stage osteoarthritis or rheumatic arthritis of the knee. However, TKA is followed by moderate to severe postoperative pain that affects postoperative rehabilitation, patient satisfaction, and overall outcomes. Historically, opioids have been widely used for perioperative pain management of TKA. However, opioids are associated with undesirable adverse effects, such as nausea, respiratory depression, and retention of urine, which limit their application in daily clinical practice. The aim of this review was to discuss the current postoperative pain management regimens for TKA. Our review of the literature demonstrated that multimodal analgesia is considered the optimal regimen for perioperative pain management of TKA and improves clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction, through a combination of several types of medications and delivery routes, including preemptive analgesia, neuraxial anesthesia, peripheral nerve blockade, patient‐controlled analgesia and local infiltration analgesia, and oral opioid/nonopioid medications. Multimodal analgesia provides superior pain relief, promotes recovery of the knee, and reduces opioid consumption and related adverse effects in patients undergoing TKA.     

铰链式人工膝关节置换术治疗骨肿瘤8例7年随访报告

目的：为观察骨肿瘤截除后采用铰链式人工膝关节的疗效。方法：为膝部骨肿瘤患者切除骨肿瘤行铰链式人工关节置换术８例,随访平均７４年（５５～１４年）。结果：显示铰链式人工膝关节作为膝部骨肿瘤截除后,重建膝关节功能,仍是一种重要的手段。结论：从术后４例并发症,如胫骨侧假体松动和膝前痛,认为有必要改进假体制式设计和加工工艺,并提出假体松动、膝前痛和其他并发症的认识和预防。     

Impact of Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy on Final Outcome in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Our Experience and Technique in Pakistan

BackgroudDue to extensive fibrosis during revision surgery, adequate exposure is essential and it can be achieved with several extensile approach options, such as tibial tubercle osteotomy. Information regarding surgical exposure during revision arthroplasty is limited in developing countries, such as Pakistan, due to the lack of adequate data collection and follow-up. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of tibial tubercle osteotomy on final outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsA total of 231 revision TKAs were performed between January 2008 and December 2017. Twenty-nine patients underwent tibial tubercle osteotomy for adequate exposure during revision surgery. Of these, 27 patients with complete follow-up were included in our study. Factors examined include age at the time of revision surgery, gender, comorbidities, arthroplasty site (right or left), body mass index (BMI), and primary indications for the tibial tubercle osteotomy during revision TKA. Functional outcome was measured by using Knee Society score (KSS) at 3 months and the final follow-up. All statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20.0 with a p-value < 0.05 considered significant.ResultsOut of 27 patients, 6 patients (22.2%) were men and 21 patients (77.7%) were women. Right knee revision arthroplasty was performed in 15 patients (55.5%), left knee revision arthroplasty was performed in 12 patients (44.4%), and bilateral revision surgery was performed in only 1 patient (3.7%). The mean BMI was 29.2 kg/m². We used a constrained condylar knee in 20 patients (74%), a rotating hinge knee in 5 patients (18.5%), and mobile bearing tray plus metaphyseal sleeves in 2 patients (7.4%). The KSS was 52.21 ± 4.05 preoperatively, and 79.42 ± 2.2 and 80.12 ± 1.33 at 3 months and 12 months, respectively. Radiological union was achieved in all patients at 3 months. Of 27 patients, only 1 patient (3.7%) had proximal migration of the osteotomy site at 6 months: the patient was asymptomatic and union was also achieved and, therefore, no surgical intervention was performed.ConclusionsTibial tubercle osteotomy during revision TKA can be a safe and reliable technique with superior outcomes and minimal complication rates.     

Results of Revision Surgery and Causes of Unstable Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate causes of unstable total knee arthroplasty and results of revision surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 24 knees that underwent a revision arthroplasty for unstable total knee arthroplasty. The average follow-up period was 33.8 months. We classified the instability and analyzed the treatment results according to its cause. Stress radiographs, postoperative component position, and joint level were measured. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and range of motion.

Results

Causes of instability included coronal instability with posteromedial polyethylene wear and lateral laxity in 13 knees, coronal instability with posteromedial polyethylene wear in 6 knees and coronal and sagittal instability in 3 knees including post breakage in 1 knee, global instability in 1 knee and flexion instability in 1 knee. Mean preoperative/postoperative varus and valgus angles were 5.8°/3.2° (p = 0.713) and 22.5°/5.6° (p = 0.032). Mean postoperative α, β, γ, δ angle were 5.34°, 89.65°, 2.74°, 6.77°. Mean changes of joint levels were from 14.1 mm to 13.6 mm from fibular head (p = 0.82). The mean HSS score improved from 53.4 to 89.2 (p = 0.04). The average range of motion was changed from 123° to 122° (p = 0.82).

Conclusions

Revision total knee arthroplasty with or without a more constrained prosthesis will be a definite solution for an unstable total knee arthroplasty. The solution according to cause is very important and seems to be helpful to avoid unnecessary over-constrained implant selection in revision surgery for total knee instability.     

Reconstruction for Massive Proximal Tibial Bone Defects Using Patient‐Customized Three‐Dimensional‐Printed Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

ObjectiveTo review the clinical outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) with massive proximal tibial bone defects using patient‐customized three‐dimensional (3D) printed highly porous metaphyseal cones.MethodsA retrospective study of all patients at our institution who underwent RTKA with the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute type III tibial defects using patient‐customized 3D‐printed highly porous metaphyseal cones was performed from 2016 to 2018. Seven patients were enrolled in this study. General results (age, sex, and body mass index); intraoperative results (interface compatibility and stability, and operating time); and perioperative complications (total blood loss, blood transfusion rate, and deep venous thrombosis) were recorded and analyzed. Clinical improvement and functional evaluation (survivorship of implant, improvement of Hospital for Special Surgery Score and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and improvement of range of motion [ROM]), and radiographic improvement and implant evaluation (progressive radiolucent lines or radiographic loosening, and mechanical alignment) were evaluated at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and then annually, postoperatively.ResultsThe mean age at diagnosis was 68 (61–77) years. The mean follow‐up was 25.3 (19–36) months. At the latest follow‐up, no aseptic loosening, prosthetic joint infection, or other complications were noted. The mean Hospital for Special Surgery Score increased from 49 (39–63) to 78 (70–83) (P < 0.01), whereas the mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index increased from 59 (46–73) to 26 (12–38) (P < 0.01). All patients achieved improved postoperative ROM with the mean flexion angle increasing from 66° (30°–80°) to 93° (80°–100°), and improved mechanical alignment with all hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angles within ±3°.ConclusionsThe patient‐customized 3D‐printed metaphyseal cone is useful technique for reconstructing massive proximal tibial bone defects, with encouraging clinical and radiological outcomes in RTKA.     

Cementless Porous‐Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves Used for Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Short‐ to Mid‐Term Outcomes

ObjectivesWhile many studies have presented excellent short‐term outcomes of the metaphyseal sleeves used in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), currently published mid‐term results remain limited and some controversial issues remain unresolved. The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical and radiographic mid‐term outcomes of the sleeves for the management of metaphyseal bone defects in revision TKAs.MethodsFrom 2015 to 2019, 44 patients (45 knees) who were operated with cementless porous‐coated metaphyseal sleeve in revision TKA were included in this study. Bone defects were assessed according to Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute Classification. On the tibial side, there were 37 type II and six type III, and with regards to the femur, 15 were type II, and four were type III. Through reviewing electronic records, data were collected, including baseline demographics, operative details, information of prothesis, and complications. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed, including Knee Society Scores (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), range of motion (ROM), the radiolucent line, level of joint line, and implant survival rate. Statistical analysis was performed by paired t‐test for clinical and radiographic indexes.ResultsThe mean follow‐up time was 4.4 ± 1.4 years. During surgery, sleeve‐related fractures were encountered in four (8.9%) knees, including incomplete tibial fracture of lateral cortex in one knee and of medial cortex in two knees, and longitudinal femoral metaphyseal fracture in one knee. Unions were achieved in all cases at the final follow‐up. Significant improvements in KSS and WOMAC scores were found at the final follow‐up, respectively, from 83.8 ± 29.1 to 152.9 ± 31.0 (t = −12.146, p < 0.001) and from 148.4 ± 42.3 to 88.1 ± 52.5 (t = 6.025, p < 0.001). The mean ROM improved from 88.7 ± 31.9° to 113.7 ± 13.7° (t = −5.370, p < 0.001). A 75 mm length of cementless stem was used in all patients and only one patient was identified as tibial end‐of‐stem pain. No sleeve‐related revision occurred, and one patient was diagnosed with early postoperative infection and was treated with irrigation and debridement, polyethylene liner exchange, and appropriate antibiotic treatment. The overall implant survival was 97.8% with the endpoint reoperation and 100% with the endpoint revision. Osseointegration at the bone‐sleeve interface was found in all patients and no loosening happened. Satisfactory alignment between 3° varus and 3° valgus was achieved in all but not in three patients.ConclusionThe use of metaphyseal sleeves in the treatment of bone defects in rTKAs can provide stable fixation and significantly improve the clinical scores at the midterm follow‐up. In addition, the rare occurrence of end‐of‐stem pain suggests routine use of cementless stems. Although there are chances of intraoperative fractures, it has no negative effect on outcome when managed properly.     

Stiffness After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Stiffness after a revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a disabling complication that has largely been overlooked in the literature. This study attempts to define the prevalence of stiffness after revision TKA and to determine the risk factors that may lead to its development. Thirty-two knees (4.0%) presented with stiffness that we defined as a range of motion less than 90°. Risk factors were found to be poor preoperative range of motion, stiffness as primary indication for revision, younger age, shorter interval between index primary and revision TKA, presence of well-fixed components at the time of revision, postoperative wound drainage, and lower Charlson index. Because of the challenges of treating stiffness, efforts should be invested in preventing this complication.     

Septic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Treatment of Metaphyseal Bone Defects Using Metaphyseal Sleeves

Background

Bone loss is a severe problem in septic revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). The use of porous coated metaphyseal sleeves is a promising treatment option for metaphyseal bone defects. The currently published midterm results remain limited and no study has been focused exclusively on septic cases. Our aim was to determine the implant survivorship (with special focus on osseointegration) and the clinical and radiological midterm outcome of metaphyseal sleeve fixation in septic RTKA surgery (minimum follow-up of 2 years).

Bone Mineral Density in the Proximal Femur and Contralateral Knee After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Osteoarthrosis (OA) is often associated with pain and disability, which are relieved after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but the nature of bone changes associated with OA is controversial. We examined preoperative hip and contralateral knee bone mineral density (BMD) in patients requiring TKA and monitored the BMD changes postoperatively. Sixty-nine patients, scheduled to have TKA for osteoarthrotic knees, had both hips and contralateral knee BMD measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the time of operation (baseline) and at 1 yr after operation. X-rays of the knee joints were also taken to evaluate the severity of OA. Preoperatively, 27% and 38% of the patients had total hip BMD Z-score more than 1 SD in the operated side and contralateral hips, respectively. In all regions of interest (ROI), the mean baseline BMD of the affected side proximal femur was significantly lower than that of the contralateral side (p < 0.0005-0.019). The severity of OA was not associated with BMD. During 1-yr follow-up, the postoperative knee status and the physical activity of the patients (AKS score) improved. However, neither the hip nor the nonoperated knee BMDs increased. Knee OA is associated with significantly lower BMD values in the affected side compared with the contralateral hip, and these levels remained similar or decreased during a 1-yr follow-up. We conclude that improved mobility after TKA does not improve the effects of preoperative disuse-associated bone loss in the short term.     

Detection of Small Periprosthetic Bone Defects after Total Knee Arthroplasty

Large bone defect around total knee prostheses is among the most critical challenges in revision surgery. However, it is difficult to detect bone defects around a prosthesis in early stage. We compared the efficacy of the detection of small bone defects between fluoroscopically guided plain radiography, CT, MRI, and a novel tomographic technique (tomosynthesis) using the six pig knee models. No bone defects were detected with plain radiography and MRI. The sensitivity and specificity of CT were 61.5% and 64.1%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of tomosynthesis were 85.4% and 87.2%, respectively. The radiation dose of tomosynthesis was 6% of that of CT. The cost of tomosynthesis was 28% of that of CT. Tomosynthesis was superior in terms of diagnosis, radiation dose, and cost.     

Analysis of Stem Tip Pain in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Stem tip pain following revision total knee arthroplasty is a significant cause of patient dissatisfaction, which in the presence of an aseptic well-fixed component has no widely accepted surgical solution. A definitive cause of stem tip pain remains elusive, however it has been suggested that high stress concentrations within the region of the stem tip may play a role. This paper reports a finite element study of a novel clinical technique where a plate is attached to the tibia within the region of the stem tip to reduce stem tip pain. The results demonstrate that the plate reduces stress concentrations in the bone at the stem tip of the implant. The magnitude of stress reduction is dependent upon plate location, material and attachment method.     

Rotating Hinge Implants for Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Contemporary rotating hinge knee (RHK) prosthesis has shown improved survival rates over earlier generations. However, reports of high complication and mechanical failure rates highlight the need for more clinical outcome data in the complex primary and revision setting. The purpose of this study is to report our results of using a contemporary rotating hinge for complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty.

Racial Disparities in Rates of Revision and use of Modern Features in Total Knee Arthroplasty,a National Registry Study

BackgroundThe purpose of our study was to investigate the association of race and ethnicity with rates of modern implant use and postoperative outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons American Joint Replacement Registry.MethodsAdult TKAs from 2012 to 2020 were queried from the American Joint Replacement Registry. A total of 1,121,457 patients were available for analysis for surgical features and 1,068,210 patients for analysis of outcomes. Mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association of race with each individual surgical feature (unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA)) and 30- and 90-day readmission. A proportional subdistribution hazard model was used to model the risk of revision TKA.ResultsOn multivariate analyses, compared to White patients, Black (odds ratio (OR): 0.52 P < .0001), Hispanic (OR 0.75 P < .001), and Native American (OR: 0.69 P = .0011) patients had lower rates of UKA, while only Black patients had lower rates of RA-TKA (OR = 0.76 P < .001). White (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.8, P < .001), Asian (HR = 0.51, P < .001), and Hispanic-White (HR = 0.73, P = .001) patients had a lower risk of revision TKA than Black patients. Asian patients had a lower revision risk than White (HR = 0.64, P < .001) and Hispanic-White (HR = 0.69, P = .011) patients. No significant differences existed between groups for 30- or 90-day readmissions.ConclusionBlack, Hispanic, and Native American patients had lower rates of UKA compared to White patients, while Black patients had lower rates of RA-TKA compared to White, Asian, and Hispanic patients. Black patients also had higher rates of revision TKA than other races.     

Cementless Metaphyseal Sleeves Used for Large Tibial Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Revision arthroplasty of large tibial defects remains a challenge. Thirty revision knee arthroplasties using a porous titanium tibial sleeve for Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) Type 2B and Type 3 defects with minimum 2 year follow up were retrospectively reviewed. The average Knee Society Score increased from 55 pre-operatively to 92 post-operatively. Six patients had a repeat operation though none were sleeve related. All radiographs at final follow-up showed well fixed components with osseous in-growth. Seven patients had end-of-stem pain, four of which resolved. Our short-term results show that porous titanium sleeves are a promising option when managing large areas of metaphyseal bone loss by filling defects and providing stable construct with biologic fixation.