Review: Induced pluripotent stem cell models of frontotemporal dementia

The increasing prevalence of dementia in the ageing population combined with the lack of treatments and the burden on national health care systems globally make dementia a public health priority. Despite the plethora of important research findings published over the past two decades, the mechanisms underlying dementia are still poorly understood and the progress in pharmacological interventions is limited. Recent advances in cellular reprogramming and genome engineering technologies offer an unprecedented new paradigm in disease modeling. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have enabled the study of patient‐derived neurons in vitro, a significant progress in the field of dementia research. The first studies using iPSCs to model dementia have recently emerged, holding promise for elucidating disease pathogenic mechanisms and accelerating drug discovery. In this review, we summarize the major findings of iPSC‐based studies in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and FTD overlapping with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (FTD/ALS). We also discuss some of the main challenges in the use of iPSCs to model complex, late‐onset neurodegenerative diseases such as dementias.     

Review: Clinical,genetic and neuroimaging features of frontotemporal dementia

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a heterogeneous group of disorders causing neurodegeneration within a network of areas centred on the frontal and temporal lobes. Clinically, patients present with behavioural symptoms (behavioural variant FTD) or language disturbance (primary progressive aphasia), although there is an overlap with motor neurone disease and atypical parkinsonian disorders. Whilst neuroimaging commonly reveals abnormalities in the frontal and temporal lobes, a closer review identifies a more complex picture with variable asymmetry of neuronal loss, widespread subcortical involvement and in many cases more posterior cortical atrophy. An autosomal‐dominant genetic disorder is found in around a third of people with mutations in progranulin, C9orf72 and the microtubule‐associated protein tau being the commonest causes. In the other two‐thirds, the disorder is sporadic, although recent genome‐wide association studies have started to identify genetic risk factors within this group. Much of this knowledge has been understood only in the past 10 years and so this review will discuss the current knowledge about the clinical, genetic and neuroimaging features of FTD.     

Profiles of white matter tract pathology in frontotemporal dementia

Despite considerable interest in improving clinical and neurobiological characterisation of frontotemporal dementia and in defining the role of brain network disintegration in its pathogenesis, information about white matter pathway alterations in frontotemporal dementia remains limited. Here we investigated white matter tract damage using an unbiased, template‐based diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) protocol in a cohort of 27 patients with the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) representing both major genetic and sporadic forms, in relation both to healthy individuals and to patients with Alzheimer's disease. Widespread white matter tract pathology was identified in the bvFTD group compared with both healthy controls and Alzheimer's disease group, with prominent involvement of uncinate fasciculus, cingulum bundle and corpus callosum. Relatively discrete and distinctive white matter profiles were associated with genetic subgroups of bvFTD associated with MAPT and C9ORF72 mutations. Comparing diffusivity metrics, optimal overall separation of the bvFTD group from the healthy control group was signalled using radial diffusivity, whereas optimal overall separation of the bvFTD group from the Alzheimer's disease group was signalled using fractional anisotropy. Comparing white matter changes with regional grey matter atrophy (delineated using voxel based morphometry) in the bvFTD cohort revealed co‐localisation between modalities particularly in the anterior temporal lobe, however white matter changes extended widely beyond the zones of grey matter atrophy. Our findings demonstrate a distributed signature of white matter alterations that is likely to be core to the pathophysiology of bvFTD and further suggest that this signature is modulated by underlying molecular pathologies. Hum Brain Mapp 35:4163–4179, 2014. © 2014 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Behaviour in frontotemporal dementia, Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to increase understanding of behavioural changes in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and identify features that best differentiate FTD from Alzheimer's disease (AD) and cerebrovascular dementia (CvD). METHODS: A semi-structured questionnaire was administered to carers of 30 FTD, 75 AD and 34 CvD patients. RESULTS: Behavioural changes that strongly discriminated FTD from AD and to a lesser extent CvD were loss of emotions and insight, selfishness, disinhibition, personal neglect, gluttony and sweet food preference, wandering, motor and verbal stereotypies, loss of pain, echolalia and mutism. Irritability, hyposexuality and hypersomnia did not discriminate. Emotional, eating and stereotyped behaviours correctly classified 95% of patients using regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Behavioural characteristics accurately differentiate FTD from AD and CvD. The findings highlight the particular importance of affective change in FTD, and underline the role of the frontotemporal lobes in emotion.     

The Middelheim Frontality Score: a behavioural assessment scale that discriminates frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND: Despite striking neuropsychological and behavioural differences between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), clinical diagnostic criteria failed to discriminate FTD from AD patients. We therefore developed the Middelheim Frontality Score (MFS), a disease-long clinical and behavioural assessment tool that measures frontal lobe features, and set up this prospective study in clinically diagnosed AD and FTD patients to assess discriminatory power and intra- and inter-rater variability. METHODS: Patients with probable AD (n = 400) and FTD (n = 62) were included. The MFS was obtained by summating the scores obtained in a standardized fashion on ten items yielding a total maximal score of 10. Information was obtained through an interview of the patient and her/his caregiver, clinical files and behavioural observation. RESULTS: Comparing mean total MFS scores, FTD patients (6.3 +/- 1.8) had significantly higher scores than AD patients (3.1 +/- 1.8) (p < 0.001). Distribution of scores on individual MFS items was significantly different between both disease groups (chi(2) = 76.2; p < 0.001). A moderately positive and highly significant correlation was shown between the total MFS score and diagnosis FTD (r = 0.478; p < 0.0001). Applying a total MFS score of 5 as discriminatory cut-off, a specificity of 89.0% and a sensitivity of 88.7% were achieved. Intra- and inter-rater variability was calculated in a different study population by means of retest correlation, revealing moderate to strong positive correlations of high statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The MFS is a clinical and behavioural assessment scale that measures frontal lobe features and that was shown to reliably discriminate FTD from AD patients.     

Functional neuroimaging and presenting psychiatric features in frontotemporal dementia

BACKGROUND: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a behavioural syndrome caused by degeneration of the frontal and anterior temporal lobes. Behavioural disturbances include psychiatric features. Whether patients with FTD present with psychiatric features varies with the initial neuroanatomical variability of FTD. OBJECTIVE: To identify presenting psychiatric changes not part of diagnostic criteria of FTD and contrast them with the degree of hemispheric asymmetry and frontal and temporal hypoperfusion on single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging. METHODS: 74 patients who met consensus criteria for FTD were evaluated at a two year follow up. All had brain SPECT on initial presentation. Results of an FTD psychiatric checklist were contrasted with ratings of regional hypoperfusion. RESULTS: The regions of predominant hypoperfusion did not correlate with differences on FTD demographic variables but were associated with presenting psychiatric features. Dysthymia and anxiety were associated with right temporal hypoperfusion. "Moria" or frivolous behaviour also occurred with temporal lobe changes, especially on the right. The only significant frontal lobe feature was the presence of a peculiar physical bearing in association with right frontal hypoperfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with FTD may present with psychiatric changes distinct from the behavioural diagnostic criteria for this disorder. Early temporal involvement is associated with frivolous behaviour and right temporal involvement is associated with emotional disturbances. In contrast, those with right frontal disease may present with alterations in non-verbal behaviour.     

Disrupted sleep and circadian patterns in frontotemporal dementia

Background:  A study of the pattern of Sleep/Wake disturbance in frontotemporal dementia (FTD).
Methods:  Sleep diaries and prolonged actigraphy were used to record the activity, sleep and wake of 13 patients with a clinical diagnosis of FTD. These were compared with diaries and actigraphy from normal age/sex matched controls and also to a population with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD).
Results:  There was significant sleep/wake disturbance in FTD. This occurred throughout the course of the illness and the nature of the sleep disturbance was different to patients with AD. FTD subjects showed increased nocturnal activity and decreased morning activity compared with controls, suggesting possible phase delay. Sleep diary data confirmed decreased sleep efficiency and decreased total sleep in all FTD patients.
Conclusions:  We describe significant sleep disturbance in non-institutionalized patients with FTD and suggest that early sleep disturbance may help differentiate between FTD and AD.     

Stereotypical movements and frontotemporal dementia.

Stereotypical movements are characteristic of autism or mental retardation but can also occur in patients with dementia, particularly frontotemporal dementia (FTD). In this study, we administered the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) to 18 patients with FTD and to 18 patients with the most common form of dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD). The AIMS scores were gathered at the initial presentation of patients who had not received antipsychotic medications. Compared to the AD patients, the FTD patients had significantly more stereotypical movements, including frequent rubbing behaviors and some self-injurious acts. All the FTD patients with stereotypical movements had compulsive-like behaviors, suggesting a similar pathophysiologic cause, and most had a decrease in their stereotypical movements with the administration of sertraline, a serotonin selective reuptake inhibitor.     

Clinical concept of frontotemporal dementia

The clinical concept of frontotemporal dementia is reviewed by discussing its relationships to several related concepts. These include dementia of the frontal lobe type, slowly progressive aphasia without dementia or primary progressive aphasia, semantic dementia and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. A number of examples of confusion in the terminology are also examined.     

Alzheimer's disease and frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia

The aim of this study was to investigate whether a brief neuropsychological battery consisting of a limited number of cognitive tests and an evaluation of the behavioural domains intended to discriminate between frontotemporal dementia (fv–FTD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), constitutes a useful instrument for making a differential clinical diagnosis between these two pathologies. Nineteen fv–FTD and 39 AD patients were compared on cognitive tasks (assessing memory, executive functions, language and constructional praxis) and on the NPI behavioural assessment. A stepwise discriminant analysis was performed to identify the linear combination of cognitive and behavioural measures able to best discriminate between the two groups. One test for each of the investigated cognitive domains (Delayed Prose Recall, FAS verbal fluency, Boston naming test, Rey's Figure A Copy) and the four subscales of the Neuropsychiatry Inventory (NPI) which best differentiated between fv–FTD and AD patients (apathy, disinhibition, euphoria, aberrant motor behaviour) were used. The analysis selected Rey's Figure A Copy, FAS verbal fluency and NPI apathy subscale as the best discriminants between fv–FTD and AD patients. The final equation assigned 73.7% of the fv–FTD patients and 94.7% of the AD patients to the correct diagnostic group. A validation study conducted on a new independent sample of 11 fv–FTD and 22 AD patients confirmed the high sensitivity (82.6 %) and specificity (81.8%) of the diagnostic equation in assigning fv–FTD and AD patients to the correct dementia group. Although both cognitive and behavioural differences exist between FTD and AD, previous studies have aimed at differentiating the two pathologies by considering the two aspects separately and discriminant analyses were focused only on neuropsychological or neuropsychiatric evaluations. The present results emphasise the importance of rating both cognitive and behavioural clinical features of the two syndromes as objectively as possible to improve differential diagnostic accuracy.     

Review: An update on clinical,genetic and pathological aspects of frontotemporal lobar degenerations

The development of our understanding of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) has gathered pace over the last 10 years. After taking a back seat to Alzheimer's disease for many years FTD has emerged as a significant group of heterogeneous diseases often affecting people under the age of 65. FTD has also been brought into the spotlight as the major disease entities of the group have clinical, genetic and pathological links to motor neuron disease/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, indicating that they form a disease spectrum. In this review, we overview how the pathological concept of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and the clinical concept of FTD evolved and show that FTLD, once thought of as a single disorder, represents a heterogeneous group of diseases with overlapping clinical symptoms, multiple causative genes and varying underlying pathology. We also provide a brief summary of the clinical manifestations, summarize the major genetic aspects and describe the main pathological features seen in the different subtypes of FTLD. We also summarize the correlations that exist between clinical presentations and pathological variants. An overview of the main pathogenic mechanisms is also provided.     

Complex compulsive behaviour in the temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia

Objective As metabolic and structural changes in frontotemporal-subcortical pathways have been reported in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorders, we investigated the correlation between complex compulsive behaviour (CCB) and the distribution of atrophy in a group of 90 patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Methods CCB was defined as complex, intentional, and time consuming repetitive behaviour, which was distinguished from simple compulsive behaviour (SCB), such as verbal and motor repetitions and utilisation behaviour. Cortical atrophy on CT and/or MRI was semi-quantitatively assessed in frontal, temporal, parietal and occipital regions, and the pattern of atrophy was compared between patients with and without CCB or SCB. Linear measures were used to establish the presence of caudate atrophy (bicaudate ratio) and ventricular enlargement (bifrontal ratio). Results CCB was reported in 18 (21 %) and SCB in 53 (61 %) FTD patients. Frontotemporal atrophy was present in 64 patients (74 %), and predominant temporal atrophy in 23 (26 %). The pattern of atrophy was asymmetric in 25 patients (29 %). Logistic regression analysis showed that temporal lobe atrophy (p < 0.005), as well as asymmetry of atrophy (p < 0.05) were independently associated with CCB, after adjusting for age at onset, gender, duration of symptoms at the time of imaging, severity of atrophy, and bicaudate and bifrontal ratio. No relationship was found between the presence of SCB and the distribution of atrophy, although patients with SCB tended to have more caudate atrophy (p < 0.1). Conclusion Temporal lobe atrophy appears to mediate CCB in patients with FTD, especially if asymmetry of atrophy is present. Future studies with quantitative and volumetric measurements of the cortical and subcortical structures may further clarify the aetiology of CCB in FTD. Received: 29 November 2000, Received in revised form: 8 March 2001, Accepted: 25 March 2001     

Distinct patterns of olfactory impairment in Alzheimer's disease, semantic dementia, frontotemporal dementia, and corticobasal degeneration

Performance on tests of odour discrimination, naming, and matching was compared in patients with four distinct forms of neurodegenerative disease: Alzheimer's disease (AD), semantic dementia (SD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and corticobasal degeneration (CBD). The SD patients were found to have a severe impairment of identification from olfaction despite having normal discrimination, consistent with the multimodal semantic impairment characteristic of this patient group. The AD patients' poor odour discrimination suggests that a perceptual impairment is the root of their poor odour identification. Mild impairments in odour identification observed in FTD and CBD are consistent with their generalised executive dysfunction. The findings illustrate that breakdown in olfaction can occur at a perceptual or semantic level, analogous to the distinction between apperceptive and associative forms of deficit in the visual and auditory modalities. The findings add further insights into the nature of the semantic deficit in SD by exploring a hitherto neglected modality and may have relevance in explaining the altered eating habits commonly associated with SD.     

Self-injurious behavior in frontotemporal dementia

Abstract

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) may be one of the most common neurodegenerative dementias with onset before age 65. Investigators have only recently characterized FTD, which encompasses Pick's disease as well as non-specific degeneration of the frontal lobes. Neuropsychiatric symptoms are the main features of FTD and include disinhibition, apathy, obsessive-compulsive behavior, and the Kluver-Bucy syndrome. We report a patient with FTD who developed prominent self-injurious behavior (SIB) consisting of persistent self-biting and hair-pulling. Stereotypical, repetitive SIB usually occurs in patients with autism or mental retardation; SIB is rarely discussed in patients with dementia. This report extends the neuropsychiatric spectrum of FTD to encompass SIB and discusses the potential mechanisms for SIB in these patients. The most likely contributing source for their self-injury is the development of obsessive-compulsive behaviors in the presence of coincident self-directed behaviors. Hyperorality from anterior temporal Involvement and the release of primitive grooming behavior from frontal degeneration are self-directed behaviors that contribute to the specific manifestations of SIB among FTD patients. The pharmacological management of SIB emphasizes drugs that work through opioid, serotonergic, or dopaminergic systems.     

Review: Fluid biomarkers for frontotemporal dementias

Frontotemporal dementias (FTDs) are clinically, genetically and pathologically heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorders that affect the frontal and anterior temporal lobes of the brain. They are relatively common causes of young‐onset dementia and usually present with behavioural disturbance (behavioural variant FTD) or language impairment (primary progressive aphasia), but there is also overlap with motor neurone disease and the atypical parkinsonian disorders, corticobasal syndrome and progressive supranuclear palsy. At post mortem, neuronal inclusions containing tau, TDP‐43 or infrequently FUS protein are seen in most cases. However, a poor correlation between clinical syndrome and underlying pathology means that it is difficult to diagnose the underlying molecular basis using clinical criteria. At this point, biomarkers for the underlying pathology come into play. This paper provides a brief update on fluid biomarkers for FTDs that may be useful to dissect the underlying molecular changes in patients presenting with signs of frontal and/or temporal lobe dysfunction. The hope is that such biomarkers, together with genetics and imaging, would be useful in clinical trials of novel drug candidates directed against specific pathologies and, in the long run, helpful in clinical practice to select the most appropriate treatment at the right dose for individual patients.     

Sentence processing in frontotemporal dementia

Patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) have sentence comprehension difficulty. We examined the hypothesis that both grammatical and resource factors contribute to their impaired sentence comprehension with a traditional, off-line sentence comprehension task, and an on-line sentence processing procedure that minimizes task-related resources. This was investigated in subgroups of FTD patients with Progressive Non-fluent Aphasia (PNFA; n = 5) who have effortful speech; non-aphasic patients with an executive deficit (EXEC; n = 8); and Semantic Dementia (SD; n = 3) patients with poor single word comprehension. The results were correlated with measures of executive resources. We found that PNFA patients are significantly impaired in their off-line sentence comprehension, and that their performance correlated with auditory-verbal short-term memory. PNFA patients also demonstrated a pattern of slowed processing for the on-line sentence measure. This is consistent with the hypothesis that information relevant for constructing sentence representations during comprehension degrades in working memory as it is activated over an abnormally slowed time course. EXEC patients had modest off-line sentence comprehension difficulty, and this correlated with performance on measures of working memory, planning, and inhibitory control. On-line processing in EXEC patients demonstrated their insensitivity to sentence-based information. This raises the possibility that a limitation in material-neutral executive resources not dedicated to grammatical processing may play a role in their sentence comprehension deficit. SD patients' pattern of on-line sentence comprehension paralleled control subjects' performance. We conclude that grammatical and executive components both contribute to sentence comprehension, and that the profile of sentence comprehension difficulty varies across FTD subgroups depending on the sentence processing component that is impaired.     

Emotional evaluation and memory in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) affects emotional evaluation, but less is known regarding the patients’ ability to remember emotional stimuli. Here, bvFTD patients and age-matched controls studied positive, negative, and neutral pictures followed by a recognition memory test. Compared to controls, bvFTD patients showed a reduction in emotional evaluation of negative scenes, but not of positive or neutral scenes. Additionally, the patients showed an overall reduction in recognition memory accuracy, due to impaired recollection in the face of relatively preserved familiarity. These results show that bvFTD reduces the emotional evaluation of negative scenes and impairs overall recognition memory accuracy and recollection.