Antidromic His Capture during Entrainment of Orthodromic AVRT

A narrow QRS tachycardia with eccentric atrial activation is presented with features favoring an orthodromic atrioventricular re‐entrant tachycardia including an extranodal paraHisian response, and a short corrected post‐pacing interval to tachycardia cycle length difference following right ventricular entrainment. However, during entrainment, the H‐H interval was entrained by the pacing train several beats prior to the A‐A interval which would suggest an atrioventricular nodal re‐entry tachycardia. We discuss the diagnosis and its mechanism. (PACE 2010; 33;1153–1156)     

A modified electrocardiographic algorithm for differentiating typical atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia from atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia mediated by concealed accessory pathway

Non-invasive prediction of tachycardia mechanism is becoming clinically important in the era of catheter ablation for curing supraventricular tachycardia. Twelve-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) during sinus rhythm and atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) or atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) with a narrow QRS complex were obtained from 154 consecutive adult patients who had received successful radiofrequency catheter ablation. The ECGs of initial 104 patients were analysed by three observers without knowledge of the electrophysiological diagnosis. The two arrhythmias were accurately diagnosed in 68% of cases. Three criteria were found to be discriminators of tachycardia mechanism by univariable analysis. Pseudo r/Q/S waves predicated AVNRT in 92% of cases (sensitivity 71%; specificity 95%). Retrograde P wave predicated AVRT in 86% of cases (sensitivity 75%; specificity 85%), RP interval > or =100 ms in 93% (sensitivity 71%; specificity 94%) and ST-segment elevation in lead aVR in 83% (sensitivity 71%; specficity 83%). According to the initial results, we proposed a modified stepwise ECG algorithm which used pseudo r/S/Q waves, RP interval and ST-segment elevation in lead aVR during tachycardia. Two observers assessed the modified algorithm in the remaining 50 patients. The algorithm was able to correctly diagnose the tachycardia mechanism in 84% and 87%, respectively. Using the modified algorithm can improve the accuracy and simplify the differential diagnosis between typical AVNRT and AVRT via concealed accessory pathway in adult patients.     

Linear Lesion Cryoablation for the Treatment of Atrioventricular Nodal Re‐entry Tachycardia in Pediatrics and Young Adults

Background: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is a relatively safe and effective method for treatment of atrioventricular nodal re‐entry tachycardia (AVNRT), but carries a 1–2% risk of AV nodal injury. Cryothermal ablation reduces the risk of AV block, but has had decreased procedural success and increased recurrence of tachycardia. We sought to evaluate the technique of linear lesion cryoablation (LLC) for treatment of AVNRT. Methods: Single institution retrospective cohort study. Each patient underwent slow pathway modification using either RF, single lesion cryoablation, or LLC. Procedural success, recurrence, freedom from tachycardia 12 months following ablation and fluoroscopy time were compared between ablation methods. Results: A total of 125 patients, median age 15.5 (4.7–23.1) years, underwent ablation: 32 RF energy, 31 single lesion cryoablation, 62 LLC. Procedural success was obtained in 94% of the LLC group compared to 58% using single lesion cryoablation (P ≤ 0.001). Ninety‐seven percent of the LLC group was free from tachycardia recurrence, significantly higher than with single lesion cryoablation (68%, P = 0.001) and equal to that of RF (97%, P = NS). Fluoroscopy time was reduced in the LLC group compared to both single lesion and RF groups (P = 0.02). There was no permanent AV nodal injury in the cryoablation groups. Conclusion: LLC is an effective means of treatment for AVNRT and is associated with significantly improved procedural success and freedom from recurrence compared to single lesion methods, while at the same time obtaining equivalent efficacy to RF. (PACE 2010; 1304–1311)     

Inducible atrioventricular nodal reentrant echo behind organic 2:1 infra-hisian block during sinus rhythm

A 77-year-old male patient with an intermittent 2:1 infra-Hisian block during sinus rhythm was presented with dizziness and near-syncope. During electrophysiological (EP) study, dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways and retrograde fast pathway were easily induced by atrial and ventricular programmed stimulation, respectively. A typical slow-fast AV nodal reentrant echo beat also could be demonstrated by single atrial extrastimulation. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can occasionally exhibit 2:1 AV block. Conversely, AV nodal reentry property had been rarely reported behind 2:1 infra-Hisian block. The EP presentation from this case may support the notion that tissues below the His are not part of the reentrant circuit of AVNRT.     

房室结折返性和房室折返性心动过速的对比研究

【目的】探讨房室结折返和房室折返性心动过速（AVNRT,AVRT）的特点及射频消融（RFCA）的疗效和安全性。【方法】回顾性分析本院近6年行RFCA的823例AVNRT和AVRT患者的临床和电生理特点及手术情况。【结果】AVRT较AVNRT多见．AVNRT女性多于男性,而AVRT男性多见（P〈0．01）。AVRT中左侧较右侧旁路多见。左侧旁路以隐匿性为主．而右侧旁路以显性为主（P〈0．01）;左侧旁路男性多见,而右侧旁路以女性为主（P〈0．01）。右侧显性旁路手术成功率明显低于其他旁路和AVNRT（P〈0．05和P〈0．01）．术后复发率明显高于左侧旁路（P〈0．05和P〈0．01）。2例AVNRT术后出现房室传导阻滞而植入心脏起搏器,发生气胸和血气胸6例。心包填塞1例．假性动脉瘤3例,1例左侧旁路放电时出现心室纤颤。无一例患者死亡。【结论】AVNRT和AVRT消融手术成功率高而复发率低．严重并发症较少．RFCA治疗AVNRT和AVRT是有效和安全的。     

Double Atrial Responses to a Single Ventricular Impulse in Long RP' Tachycardia

Double atrial responses (DARs) to a single ventricular impulse have been described in patients with long RP' tachycardia. To define the determinants for the occurrence of DARs. 8 cases with long RP' tachycardia were examined. The mechanism of long RP' tachycardia was the orthodromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) involving a slow conducting concealed accessory pathway in 4 cases and uncommon (fast-slow) type of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in the other 4 cases. Programmed and rapid ventricular pacing was performed during sinus rhythm and also rapid ventricular pacing during tachycardia (i.e., entrainment). The retrograde effective refractory period (ERP) and the retrograde maximal 1:1 conduction rate of the fast and slow conducting pathways were examined. In 1 of the 4 cases with AVRT, DARs were observed during programmed and rapid ventricular pacing, performed during sinus rhythm and also during entrainment. In 1 of the 4 cases with AVNRT, DARs were observed only during entrainment. The determinants of DARs in cases with long RP' tachycardia were: (1) presence of two different retrogradely conducting pathways; (2) short ERP of the retrograde fast and slow conducting pathways and a short minimal pacing cycle length at which 1:1 ventriculoatrial conduction occurs via these pathways; (3) crucial conduction delay in the slow conducting pathway: and (4) preexisting antegrade unidirectional block in the slow conducting pathway or the antegrade block in the slow conducting pathway produced by collision with a previous retrograde impulse during entrainment.     

Symptomatic Sinus Tachycardia with Perpetuating Slow Pathway: Successful Treatment with Radiofrequency Ablation

We report a case of sinus tachycardia with perpetuating slow pathway (SP) conduction in a 42‐year‐old woman who developed severe symptoms as a result of atrioventricular (AV) desynchronization. The restoration of an AV synchrony, achieved with selective radiofrequency ablation of the SP, eliminated the symptomatic arrhythmia and may represent a reasonable therapeutic option despite the fact that the patient has no AV‐node reentrant tachycardia. This case demonstrates the importance of AV timing.     

Successful radiofrequency ablation of a slow atrioventricular nodal pathway on the left posterior atrial septum

RF catheter ablation is highly effective in eliminating atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia by targeting the slow pathway in the posteroinferior part of Koch's triangle in the right atrium. We report here a patient in whom "slow-fast" atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia was eliminated only by ablation of the slow pathway in the left atrial posteroseptal region at the level of the mitral annulus after unsuccessful attempts at the traditional site on the right side.     

A specific sign for differential diagnosis of atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia from atrial tachycardia

Narrow QRS tachycardia with atrial activation occurring before ventricular activation was induced in a 34-year-old woman with dilated cardiomyopathy. During tachycardia late ventricular extrastimulus delivered when His bundle was refractory failed to reset the tachycardia while early ventricular extrastimulus caused paradoxical delay of the subsequent atrial response and terminated the tachycardia with a QRS not being followed by an atrial response. This is a rare but specific sign for excluding atrial reentry as the mechanism of tachycardia when P wave or atrial activation is registered before QRS response.     

A Direct Midseptal Approach to Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Pathway Ablation

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to describe a midseptal approach to selective slow pathway ablation for the treatment of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). In addition, predictors of success and recurrence were evaluated. Methods: Selective ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway utilizing radiofrequency (RF) energy and a midseptal approach was attempted in 60 consecutive patients with inducible AVNRT. Results: Successful slow pathway ablation or modification was achieved in 59 of 60 patients (98%) during a single procedure. One patient developed inadvertent complete AV block (1.6%). A mean of 2,7 ±1.4 RF applications were required with mean total procedure, ablation, and fluoroscopic times of 191± 6.3, 22.8 ± 2.3, and 28.2 ±1.8 minutes, respectively. The PR and AH intervals, as well as the antegrade and retrograde AV node block cycle length, were unchanged. However, the fast pathway effective refractory period was significantly shortened following ablation (354± 13 msec vs 298 ± 12 msec; P= 0.008). The A/V ratio at successful ablation sites were no different than those at unsuccessful sites (0.22 ± 0.04 vs 0.23± 0.03). Junctional tachycardia was observed during all successful and 60 of 122 (49%) unsuccessful RF applications (P < 0.0001). A residual AV nodal reentrant echo was present in 15 of 59 (25%) patients, During a mean follow-up of 20.1± 0.6 months (11.5–28 months) there were four recurrences (5%), 4 of 15 (27%) in patients with and none of 44 patients without residual slow pathway conduction (P = 0.002). Conclusions: A direct midseptal approach to selective ablation of the slow pathway is a safe, efficacious, and efficient technique. Junctional tachycardia during RF energy application was a highly sensitive but not specific predictor of success and residual slow pathway conduction was associated with a high rate of recurrence.     

Familial atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia

Dual atrioventricular nodal pathways, the substrate responsible for atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia (AVNRT), are thought to be randomly occurring congenital anomalies. This article describes 14 patients in six families, each with two or three first-degree relatives with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Electrophysiological evidence of dual atrioventricular nodal pathways was established in all 13 patients studied, AVNRT was induced in 12 (92%), and radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway was curative in all cases. The data suggest a hereditary contribution to the development of atrioventricular nodal pathways and AVNRT. The pattern of inheritance appears to be autosomal dominant.     

The electrophysiological characteristics in patients with ventricular stimulation inducible fast-slow form atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can usually be induced by atrial stimulation. However, it seldom may be induced with only ventricular stimulation, especially the fast-slow form of AVNRT. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the specific electrophysiological characteristics in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation. METHODS: The total population consisted of 1,497 patients associated with AVNRT, and 106 (8.4%) of them had the fast-slow form of AVNRT and 1,373 (91.7%) the slow-fast form of AVNRT. In patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT, the AVNRT could be induced with only ventricular stimulation in 16 patients, Group 1; with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation in 90 patients, Group 2; and with only atrial stimulation in 13 patients, Group 3. We also divided these patients with slow-fast form AVNRT (n = 1,373) into two groups: those that could be induced only by ventricular stimulation (Group 4; n = 45, 3%) and those that could be induced by atrial stimulation only or by both atrial and ventricular stimulation (n = 1.328, 97%). RESULTS: Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a lower incidence of an antegrade dual AVN physiology (0% vs 71.1% and 92%, P < 0.001), a lower incidence of multiple form AVNRT (31% vs 69% and 85%, P = 0.009), and a more significant retrograde functional refractory period (FRP) difference (99 +/- 102 vs 30 +/- 57 ms, P < 0.001) than those that could be induced with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation. The occurrence of tachycardia stimulated with only ventricular stimulation was more frequently demonstrated in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT than in those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT (15% vs 3%, P < 0.001). Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a higher incidence of retrograde dual AVN physiology (75% vs 4%, P < 0.001), a longer pacing cycle length of retrograde 1:1 fast and slow pathway conduction (475 +/- 63 ms vs 366 +/- 64 ms, P < 0.001; 449 +/- 138 ms vs 370 +/- 85 ms, P = 0.009), a longer retrograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway (360 +/- 124 ms vs 285 +/- 62 ms, P = 0.003), and a longer retrograde FRP of the fast and slow pathway (428 +/- 85 ms vs 362 +/- 47 ms, P < 0.001 and 522 +/- 106 vs 456 +/- 97 ms, P = 0.026) than those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a different incidence of the antegrade and retrograde dual AVN physiology and the specific electrophysiological characteristics. The mechanism of the AVNRT stimulated only with ventricular stimulation was supposed to be different in patients with the slow-fast and fast-slow forms of AVNRT.