Use of Implant‐Supported Custom Milled Impression Copings to Capture Soft‐Tissue Contours and Incisal Guidance

A technique is presented where a custom milled impression coping is used to replicate the clinically established anterior incisal guidance to the definitive prosthesis when multiple implants are restored in the esthetic zone. A conventional impression is initially made, then the stone cast is scanned, and a digitally designed custom screw‐retained, implant‐supported interim prosthesis is milled from a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) billet. This is aimed to digitally design the pontic areas, contour the gingival soft tissue, and establish an anterior incisal guidance. A custom milled impression coping (CMIC) is then fabricated. The CMIC has contours similar to the contours of the interim prosthesis and is fabricated from a PMMA billet. Titanium inserts are placed in the interim prosthesis and the CMIC. The CMIC is inserted intraorally and used for the final impression by using a custom tray and by following the open tray impression protocol. With the proposed technique, the exact contours of the digitally designed and clinically verified interim prosthesis are used to fabricate the definitive restoration.     

Direct custom implant impression copings for the preservation of the pontic receptor site architecture

The direct custom implant impression coping technique is designed to record the periimplant gingiva and pontic receptor site after the tissues have been shaped with a provisional restoration. The technique prevents inaccurate recording of the gingival architecture by using a dual polymerizing composite resin placed into the sulcus and pontic receptor sites and adapted to the open tray implant impression copings. This technique may improve soft tissue accuracy between the clinical condition and the laboratory cast.     

Fabricating an Accurate Implant Master Cast: A Technique Report

The technique for fabricating an accurate implant master cast following the 12‐week healing period after Teeth in a Day® dental implant surgery is detailed. The clinical, functional, and esthetic details captured during the final master impression are vital to creating an accurate master cast. This technique uses the properties of the all‐acrylic resin interim prosthesis to capture these details. This impression captures the relationship between the remodeled soft tissue and the interim prosthesis. This provides the laboratory technician with an accurate orientation of the implant replicas in the master cast with which a passive fitting restoration can be fabricated.     

An alternative method of fabricating a custom tray for direct implant impressions

Creating accurate impressions for implants is essential for fabricating passive-fitting prostheses. This report describes a modified technique for fabricating a custom impression tray when implants are positioned unfavorably. A simple and accurate method of making an implant impression tray and the benefits of this technique are highlighted in this technical report.     

Simple method of fabricating an impression coping to reproduce peri-implant gingiva on the master cast

This article describes a simple technique in which a custom impression coping is fabricated with flowable composite and used to reproduce peri-implant soft tissues on the master cast. This procedure is designed to generate an accurate reproduction of the gingival contours surrounding the implant, thus contributing to a final restoration with favorable esthetics.     

模型置换印模技术修复下颌游离端牙列缺损的临床研究

目的：探讨模型置换印模技术对双侧下颌游离端缺牙患者的修复效果。方法：在解剖式印模上常规制作铸造支架,在铸造支架上制作自凝暂时基板,经口内肌功能修整并制取咬合记录后于口内取功能性印模。经模型置换后常规完成义齿。结果：90.2%的患者用模型置换印模技术制作的义齿疗效良好。结论：模型置换印模作为游离端可摘部分义齿的重要功能印模方法,可以有效改善义齿修复质量。     

Evaluation of Accuracy of Direct Transfer Snapon Impression Coping Closed Tray Impression Technique and Direct Transfer Open Tray Impression Technique: An In Vitro Study

Accuracy of the implant impression technique is one of the key factor determining the strain free fit of the prosthesis fabricated which influences the treatment success. Two implant impression techniques namely the closed tray technique with transfer coping and open tray technique were evaluated for accuracy with stone casts obtained from them. Casts were evaluated using a custom constructed bar on strain gage (SYSCOM) and abutment coordinates using Coordinate Measuring Machine (TESA micro-HITE). The statistical analysis with one way ANOVA and Mann–Whitney tests show that the casts obtained with open tray technique were accurate than the casts of closed tray technique (significance P < 0.001). Direct transfer impression technique with less number of components ensures the high accuracy of transfer of implant positions from master cast to the laboratory cast compared to the indirect transfer impression technique.     

Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The accuracy of an implant fixture-level impression is affected by the type of impression tray used. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the accuracy of open tray implant impressions comparing polycarbonate stock impression trays and rigid custom-made impression trays to make implant fixture-level impressions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Gold cylinder pairs, splinted by gold bars (reference frameworks) were constructed on an aluminum typodont. Polyether impressions were made of 2 pairs of Br?nemark 3.75-mm diameter fixtures mounted in an aluminium typodont, with 3 stock impression trays, 3 close-fit custom trays, and 3 spaced custom impression trays, by use of an open tray technique. The casts produced were assessed for accuracy by attaching the reference frameworks with alternate single screws and measuring the vertical fit discrepancy of these reference frameworks to the analogs within the working cast using a traveling microscope. Comparison of gap dimensions by tray type was performed with a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by pair-wise Mann-Whitney U tests. To adjust for multiple comparisons in the post-ANOVA contrasts (P<.02). Comparison of gap dimensions between anterior and posterior regions were performed with Mann-Whitney U tests (P <.05). RESULTS: The results showed that the mean fit accuracy, as measured by vertical fit discrepancy, of casts from the stock trays (23 +/- 20 microm) were statistically significantly less (P<.001) than the spaced custom trays (12 +/- 10 microm) or close fit custom trays (11 +/- 10 microm). The difference in median gap size for analogs with a 20-mm separation was 10 microm. CONCLUSION: Within the limits of this in vitro study, rigid custom trays produced significantly more accurate impressions than the polycarbonate stock trays. The stock trays used in this study could not produce accurate impressions consistently. For analogs with a 20-mm separation, there was a difference in medians of 10 microm in accuracy between the stock and custom trays.     

Prosthodontic considerations designed to optimize outcomes for single-tooth implants. A review of the literature

Background: The aim of this study was to review the literature on the restoration of single‐tooth implants, and to develop evidence‐based conclusions to optimize aesthetic, biologic and patient‐related outcomes. Methods: An electronic and hand search was conducted using the search terms ‘dental implants, single‐tooth; dental restoration, temporary; dental impression materials; dental impression technique; dental prosthesis, implant‐supported; dental prosthesis design; dental abutments; dental occlusion; maintenance; survival; and survival analysis’. Resultant titles were screened, and full text was obtained where relevant. The authors selected the most appropriate articles, giving preference to systematic reviews and long‐term, patient‐based outcome data. Results: Thirty‐nine articles were selected and critiqued by the authors. Conclusions: There was strong suggestion by several authors that peri‐implant soft tissue aesthetics can be sculpted through provisional restoration contour, but there are no clinical outcome studies to define or support this claim. Laboratory studies demonstrate that pick‐up type impression copings in conjunction with elastomeric impressions are the most accurate means for transferring implant position to a dental cast. Laboratory and finite‐element analysis studies suggest implants with an internal‐type connection show improved stress distribution, but supportive clinical data are lacking. The authors of this review favour a screw‐retained prosthesis for retrievability. Clinical and histological studies show that gold, titanium and zirconia ceramic abutment materials exhibit excellent biological responses, although there is insufficient data on the clinical service provided by zirconia as an implant‐substructure material. The literature does not associate any particular occlusal scheme with superior clinical outcomes. Implant‐borne single crowns offer comparable clinical service to tooth‐borne fixed dental prostheses. However, single‐tooth implant restorations are associated with an increased incidence of biological and technical complications.     

The O‐Ring Universal Impression Technique

Recording the implant position for master cast fabrication for multiple implant systems may require a large inventory of impression copings. A technique is described whereby implant impression‐making procedures can be modified to be more universal to all implant systems. This makes the procedure more cost‐effective by simply incorporating the use of a rubber O‐ring on the abutment or fixture mount, which then eliminates the use of a transfer coping. This technique can be applied at the time of surgery for indexing as well as during the final impression appointment.     

Implant Digital Impression in the Esthetic Area

The aim of this report is to describe two standardized protocols for digital impression when implant support rehabilitation is used in the esthetic area. The two techniques were used to transfer all provisional crown parameters to definitive restorations in different clinical scenarios. In the direct technique, an impression (STL1) is made of the provisional restorations attached to the implants, with surrounding gingival tissue. The second scan (STL2) captures the sulcular aspect of the peri‐implant soft tissue immediately after removal of the provisional restoration. The last impression (STL3) of the complete arch is made with a standardized scanbody attached to the implant to capture the 3D location of the implant. The direct technique is indicated when the peri‐implant soft tissues are stable upon removal of the provisional restoration. The indirect technique is used when the gingival tissue collapses rapidly after the removal of the provisional crown. The impressions of the provisional restoration and the position of the implant are similar to those obtained with the direct technique, and the shape of the peri‐implant tissue is extrapolated from the negative shape obtained from making the digital impression when the provisional restoration is taken out of the mouth. Finally, in both techniques the 3 scans are superimposed to obtain a file, which contains the details of the peri‐implant soft tissue. The direct and indirect digital techniques allowed realization of a predictable definitive restoration in the esthetic zone in different clinical scenarios, reducing the duration of clinical procedures.     

An Alternative Technique for an Accurate Implant-Retained Prosthesis Impression

A technique is described to help ensure the accurate reproduction of rigid implant components and the edentulous soft tissue. Splinted implant impression copings are luted together with resin to a specially designed custom tray.     

The functional bilaminar impression technique for the distal extension removable partial denture

In recent years, many clinicians have abandoned the time-consuming and technique-sensitive border-molded custom impression in favor of a simplified stock tray and irreversible hydrocolloid final impression. However, the master cast obtained by this simplified method often will lead to a completed prosthesis that has inadequate support from the distal extension tissue areas. This article presents a simple, predictable, clinically effective, and readily learned functional bilaminar impression technique that will allow dentists to make an anatomically and functionally supported distal extension removable partial denture.     

Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Accurate recording of implant locations is required so that definitive restorations are properly supported and do not place additional stress on the implants. Angulated implants may result in inaccurate impressions, and the impression technique may affect the accuracy of the definitive cast. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect the combined interaction of impression technique, implant angulation, and implant number has on the accuracy of implant definitive casts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One definitive stone cast was fabricated for each of 6 experimental groups and 1 control group. All 7 definitive casts had 3 implants arranged in a triangular pattern creating a plane. In the 6 experimental groups, the center implant was perpendicular to the plane of the cast while the outer implants had 5, 10, or 15 degrees convergence towards or divergence away from the center implant. The control definitive cast had all 3 implants parallel to each another and perpendicular to the plane of the cast. Five open tray and 5 closed tray addition silicone impressions were made of each definitive cast. Impressions were poured with type IV dental stone, and a fine tip measuring stylus was used to record multiple axis (X-Y-Z) coordinates on the top surface of the implant hex and on the cast base. Computer software was used to align the data sets and vector calculations determined the difference in degrees between the implant angles in the definitive cast and the duplicate casts. Statistical analysis used repeated-measures ANOVA (alpha=.05) with post-hoc tests of significant interactions. RESULTS: The angle errors for the closed and open tray impression techniques did not differ significantly (P=.22). Implant angulations and implant numbers differed in average angle errors but not in any easily interpreted pattern (P<.001). The combined interaction of impression technique, implant angulation, and implant number had no effect on the accuracy of the duplicate casts compared to the definitive casts (P=.19). CONCLUSIONS: The average angle errors for the closed and open tray impression techniques did not differ significantly. There was no interpretable pattern of average angle errors in terms of implant angulation and implant number. The magnitude of distortion was similar for all combinations of impression technique, implant angulation, and implant number.     

Management of a Fractured Implant Abutment Screw: A Clinical Report

In an abutment screw fracture, it is generally a challenge for the clinician to remove fractured fragments. In some cases, the screw cannot be removed, and alternative solutions should be considered. This clinical report describes the replacement of a ball attachment with a fractured screw, which was impossible to retrieve, with a cast dowel with ball attachment. The patient who presented to the Department of Prosthodontics, Yeditepe University, Faculty of Dentistry was a 65‐year‐old woman, wearing a mandibular complete denture supported by two implants for 4 years. She complained about the loss of retention of the denture because of the fractured abutment screw, and it was found that another dentist had previously tried to retrieve the fractured screw with no success. It was decided to construct a cast dowel with ball attachment to improve retention without sacrificing the implant. The interior of the implant and the fractured screw were machined with a rotating instrument. An impression was taken with a metal strip and silicone‐based materials. In the laboratory, a stone die was generated from the impression, and a custom‐made cast dowel with ball attachment was constructed. It was then cemented with glass ionomer cement and connected to the denture with the direct method. The alternative procedure described in this clinical report was successful for the removal of the fractured abutment screw and use of the existing denture.     

An Alternative Approach in Fabrication of Fixed Complete Dentures Using a Duplicate Denture

The traditional prosthetic steps in the fabrication of a fixed complete denture after implant osseointegration include final impression, verification of implant positioning in the working cast, mounting of the working cast, and mock denture wax trial insertion prior to the laboratory fabrication of the metal substructure; however, in patient scenarios of immediate loading of implants, the interim conversion prosthesis can be used to advance from the final impression to the milling of the underlying framework in one appointment. Consistency in the initial wax trial insertion, radiographic guide, and intraoral positioning of the conversion prosthesis can result in a well‐designed definitive prosthesis in less time with the use of the existing duplicate complete denture.     

An impression technique for implant-retained orbital prostheses

This article describes an impression technique for an implant-retained orbital prosthesis; in this situation, making the implant impressions in the conventional manner was not possible due to improper implant positioning. An advantage of this technique is that the acrylic resin transfer device that incorporates magnets is also used as the acrylic resin substructure for the silicone orbital prostheses. A disadvantage of the procedure is the requirement of an additional appointment to make the definitive impression. The effect of acrylic resin polymerization shrinkage is minimized by prefabricating the acrylic resin substructure that is used to splint magnets and corrected at the time that the definitive impression is made.     

An alternative method for restoring single-tooth implants

BACKGROUND: Having laboratory technicians prepare soft-tissue casts and implant abutments with or without concomitant removable temporary prostheses during the restorative phase of single-tooth replacement is an accepted practice. It can, however, result in functional and esthetic intraoral discrepancies. CASE DESCRIPTION: Single-tooth implants can be restored with crowns (like those for natural teeth) fabricated at a dental laboratory on casts obtained from final impressions of prepared implant abutments. In the case reported, the restorative dentist restored the patient's single-tooth implant after taking a transfer impression. He constructed a cast simulating the peri-implant soft tissue with final impression material and prepared the abutment on this model. His dental assistant then fabricated a fixed provisional restoration on the prepared abutment. At the patient's next visit, the dentist torqued the prepared abutment onto the implant, took a final impression and inserted the provisional restoration. A crown was made conventionally at the dental laboratory and cemented in place at the following visit. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This alternative method for restoring single-tooth implants enhances esthetics by more accurately simulating marginal gingival architecture. It also improves function by preloading the implant through fixed temporization after the dentist, rather than the laboratory technician, prepares the abutment to the dentist's preferred contours.     

Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the accuracy of 2 implant-level impression techniques (direct nonsplinted and splinted) for the fabrication of multi-unit internal-connection implant restorations in 2 simulated clinical settings (parallel and divergent) using a laboratory model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dental stone master model was fabricated with 2 pairs of implant replicas. One pair simulated a parallel clinical condition and the other an 8-degree-divergent condition. Ten stone casts were made from vinyl polysiloxane impressions of the master model for each impression technique. Half of the samples were created by a direct nonsplinted technique (square impression copings, custom tray), and the other half were made by a direct splinted technique (square impression copings splinted with autopolymerizing acrylic resin, custom tray). Four strain gauges were fixed on each metal framework to measure the degree of framework deformation for each stone cast in half-Wheatstone-bridge formations. Deformation readings were made twice in 4 directions (anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior). Deformation data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance at a .05 level of significance. RESULTS: No significant difference in deformation was found between the direct nonsplinted and splinted samples in either simulated clinical condition (P > .05). No significant difference in deformation was found between the techniques regardless of condition (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, using a 2-implant model, the accuracy of implant-level impressions for internal-connection implant restorations was similar for the direct nonsplinted and splinted techniques in settings with divergence up to 8 degrees.     

摄影测量与传统印模技术制取牙列缺失种植修复印模精度的比较研究

目的:通过体外实验对比摄影测量与传统印模技术制取牙列缺失种植修复印模的精度。方法:选择1例2019年9月就诊于首都医科大学口腔医学院种植中心的74岁男性上颌牙列缺失患者的上颌石膏模型,其上含螺丝固位基台替代体8个。通过开窗夹板式印模复制该石膏模型,将复制模型作为参考模型。由同1名主治医师用两种方法制取参考模型种植体基台...