Balloon aortic valvuloplasty: Treatment of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement complicated by a paravalvular leak

The Edwards Intuity Elite valve system was designed to facilitate minimally invasive surgery and streamline complex aortic valve replacements and has since gained more popularity. Despite the superior results shown with rapid deployment aortic valve replacement (RDAVR) utilizing this valve system, paravalvular leaks (PVL), as a complication, remains a concern. Currently, there is no universally agreed single treatment option. A 53‐year‐old male with a history of well‐controlled diabetes mellitus and hypertension presented to the emergency room with a 1‐month history of angina, syncope on exertion and dyspnea. On further workup, he was found to have severe aortic stenosis in the setting of a bicuspid aortic valve, with non‐obstructive coronary artery disease. He proceeded to urgent RDAVR with a 23 mm Edwards Intuity Valve. Six months post‐RDAVR he re‐presented with dyspnea on exertion and near syncopal episodes. Postoperative transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography revealed moderate to severe PVL posterior to the prosthetic aortic valve. Balloon valvuloplasty with a 25 mm True Balloon was performed. Resolution of the PVL was confirmed postprocedure both by angiography and echocardiography. The patient was followed for 1 year and remained symptom‐free with evidence of mild PVL on surveillance echocardiography. In conclusion, multiple treatment options for RDAVR complicated by PVL exist; however mid to long‐term outcome data are lacking. We presented one such case successfully treated with balloon aortic valvuloplasty.     

Early and midterm outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valves

Background

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis has been considered a relative contraindication to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We compared the outcomes of TAVR in patients with BAV stenosis versus patients with trileaflet aortic valve stenosis.

Methods

From March 2012 to September 2017, 727 patients underwent TAVR. Thirty‐two patients with BAV were included in this study and compared to 96 patients with comparable risk factors (1:3) with a trileaflet aortic valve (TAV). Transesophageal echocardiography was used to estimate post‐TAVR degree of paravalvular leak (PVL).

Results

Mean ± standard deviation Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk was 6.01 ± 3.42 in the BAV group and 6.08 ± 3.76 in the TAV group (P = 0.92). Thirty‐day mortality was 4.2% (N = 4) in the TAV group and 6.25% (N = 2) in the BAV group (P = 0.63). Three (3.1%) patients in the TAV group and two (6.25%) patients in the BAV group developed a post operative stroke (P = 0.59). Following TAVR, mean aortic valve gradient significantly decreased in both TAV (42.56 ± 14.93 vs 9.27 ± 5.57, P < 0.001) and BAV (44.12 ± 11.82 vs 9.03 ± 7.29, P < 0.001) groups. No patient had a severe PVL after TAVR, and only two (2.08%) patients in the TAV group and one (3.12%) patient in the BAV group had moderate PVL (P = 1.0). Patient survival rate at 1 and 2 years was 86% in the BAV group and 90% at 1 and 2 years in the TAV group (P = 0.74).

Conclusions

TAVR in BAV disease is feasible with favorable valve performance. Immediate and mid‐term outcomes of TAVR in patients with BAV are comparable to those with TAV.     

Implementation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in California: Influence on aortic valve surgery

Objective

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures were introduced in 2011. Initially, procedures were limited to patients who were not surgical candidates, but subsequently high-risk surgical candidates were considered for TAVR. The influence on aortic valve surgery in California is unknown.

Early hemodynamics and clinical outcomes of isolated aortic valve replacement with stentless or transcatheter valve in intermediate-risk patients

Objective

Stentless aortic valves have been developed to overcome obstructive limitations associated with stented bioprostheses. The aim of the current multi-institutional study was to compare hemodynamics of transcatheter (TAVR) and the Freedom SOLO Stentless (FS) valve in an intermediate risk population undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement.

Sutureless aortic valve replacement with concomitant valvular surgery

Objectives

Sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) is an alternative technique to standard aortic valve replacement. We evaluated our experience with the Perceval SU-AVR with concomitant mitral valve surgery, with or without tricuspid valve surgery, and aimed to discuss the technical considerations.

Successful implantation of self-expanding valve for a failed stentless prosthesis

Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation is currently used for failed bioprosthesis. The use of a transcatheter prosthesis in a regurgitant noncalcified root implanted Medtronic Freestyle prosthesis is particularly challenging. We present a successful transaxillary valve-in-valve implantation of a self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve prosthesis in a failed Freestyle bioprothesis implanted eleven years earlier. Tips and tricks are discussed.     

Rapid deployment or sutureless versus conventional bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis

Objectives

This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the early and follow-up outcomes of aortic valve replacement using rapid deployment or sutureless (RD) valves (RDAVR group) with aortic valve replacement using conventional bioprostheses (CAVR group).

Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation; the initial 50 patients

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of minimally invasive transapical beating heart aortic valve implantation (TAP-AVI) for high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. METHODS: TAP-AVI was performed via a small anterolateral minithoracotomy in 50 patients from February 2006 to March 2007. A balloon expandable transcatheter xenograft (Edwards SAPIEN THV, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) was used. Mean age was 82.4+/-5 years and 39 (78%) were female. Implantation was performed in a hybrid operative theatre using fluoroscopic and echocardiographic visualization. Average EuroSCORE predicted risk for mortality was 27.6+/-12%. Seven (14%) patients were re-operations with patent bypass grafts. RESULTS: TAP-AVI (13 patients 23 mm and 37 patients 26 mm) was successfully performed on the beating heart under temporary rapid ventricular pacing in 47 (94%) patients, and implantation was performed completely off-pump in 34 (68%) patients. Three patients required early conversion; two of them were successfully discharged. There was no prosthesis migration or embolization observed. Echocardiography revealed good hemodynamic function in all and minor incompetence in 23 patients, mostly paravalvular, without any signs of hemolysis. Mortality was due to the overall health condition and non-valve related in all patients. Actuarial survival at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year was 92+/-3.8%, 73.9+/-6.2% and 71.4+/-6.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation is feasible using an off-pump technique. Good results have been achieved in the initial 50 patients, especially when considering the overall high-risk profile of these patients.     

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement as a bridge to surgical aortic valve replacement in a younger patient with extremely high surgical risk

A 50‐year‐old man with decompensated aortic stenosis displayed significantly reduced ejection fraction, an ascending aortic aneurysm (55 mm in diameter), and bilateral giant bullae, and was evaluated as having extremely high surgical risk. Therefore, as a bridge to definitive treatment, he simultaneously underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and upper left lung lobectomy. His heart function recovered 6 months later and he underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and graft replacement of the ascending aorta. TAVR may serve as a bridge procedure before SAVR for aortic stenosis in younger patients with high surgical risk.