Clinical experience with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and urinary FSH: a retrospective case- controlled analysis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and efficiency of recombinant FSH (rFSH) and urinary FSH (uFSH). DESIGN: Retrospective case controlled analysis. SETTING: An assisted reproduction unit at a university center. PATIENT(S): 1388 patients undergoing long protocol in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF-ET) using buserelin acetate from day 2 of the cycle and either rFSH (follitropin beta) (n = 694) or uFSH (n = 694) with equal number of ampules started (rFSH: 50 IU, uFSH: 75 IU). INTERVENTION(S): Patients were included in the two groups of treatment after matching for similarity in age and type of treatment (IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Total dose of FSH, ovarian response, and IVF outcome. RESULT(S): Patients who received uFSH experienced a shorter period of stimulation, and a higher number of oocytes were collected. The total FSH used was lower in the rFSH group, and they required a lower FSH dose per oocyte retrieved. The implantation and pregnancy rates were similar between the uFSH and rFSH groups. In both groups implantation and pregnancy rates were higher when intracytoplasmic sperm injection was performed as compared with IVF. CONCLUSION(S): The implantation and pregnancy rates are similar when either rFSH or uFSH is used (when compared on an ampule-to-ampule basis, rFSH: 50 IU, and uFSH: 75 IU). However, a significantly lower total FSH dose was used in the rFSH group with a lower FSH dose per oocyte collected.     

NEWS AROUND THE WORLD: Reflections on the Cost-Effectiveness of Recombinant FSH in Assisted Reproduction. The Clinician's Perspective

Purpose: To analyze the relative cost-effectiveness of recombinant FSH (rFSH) and urinary FSH (uFSH) in assisted reproduction techniques (ART).Methods: Calculation of the average cost-effectiveness ratio and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio to compare costs and effects (pregnancy rates) of the two therapeutic options (rFSH and uFSH).Results: Assuming that the cost of the procedure per ART cycle is between 100,000 pesetas (601 euro) and 150,000 pesetas (901.52 euro), and pricing the GnRH analogues used for pituitary suppression at 35,000 pesetas (210.3 euro), the cost-effectiveness ratio is better for rFSH than for uFSH, implying that the cost per pregnancy is lower when the recombinant preparation is used.Conclusions: In ART, the use of rFSH is more cost-effective than uFSH.     

Recombinant FSH vs. urinary FSH for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE: To compare ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH) vs. urinary FSH (uFSH) in terms of hormonal events within ovarian follicles and the outcome of in vitro fertilization. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized comparative study of rFSH (n = 70) vs. uFSH (n = 61) ovarian stimulation. Hormone determinations were serum estradiol (E2) on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration, and E2, androstenedione (A) and testosterone (T) at the time of follicular aspiration in the follicular fluid and serum. RESULTS: The total dose of gonadotropins required and the length of ovarian stimulation were the same in the 2 groups. In follicular fluid the E2 and the A levels were significantly higher in the rFSH group (3,065 +/- 1,646 vs. 2,368 +/- 1,240 nmol/L, P = .004, and 103.7 +/- 51.6 vs. 89.0 +/- 42.3 nmol/L, P = .042, respectively), whereas A:E2 and T:E2 ratios were significantly lower (39.6 +/- 22.5 vs. 52.3 +/- 59.6, P = .042, and 9.1 +/- 4.7 vs. 17.6 +/- 26.9, P = .006, respectively). Serum hormonal levels, number of oocytes retrieved and pregnancy rates did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSION: rFSH provides results similar to those of uFSH. rFSH enhances steroidogenesis and provokes different androgen/estrogen ratios than does uFSH without influencing the outcome of in vitro fertilization.     

Efficacy of a combined protocol of urinary and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone used for ovarian stimulation of patients undergoing ICSI cycle

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of using both urinary and recombinant FSH in a combined protocol for ovarian stimulation in an IVF treatment program. Method A total of 119 infertile couples undergoing ICSI treatment were randomized prospectively in this study. After a standard down-regulation with GnRH analogue, the patients were randomized in 2 groups 58 received combined urinary and recombinant FSH, starting with uFSH and then rFSH, and 61 controls received only recombinant FSH. Result(s) Pregnancy and implantation rates were significantly higher in the combined uFSH/rFSH group than the control (rFSH) group (43.9% vs 22.1% and 27.5% vs 13.2% respectively). Metaphase II oocyte and grade 1 embryos were significantly higher in favour of combined uFSH/rFSH group than the recombinant FSH group. Conclusion(s) This study shows that using a combination of both urinary and recombinant FSH for ovarian stimulation improves oocyte maturity and embryo cleavage, and increases pregnancy and implantation rates.     

Ovulation induction with urinary FSH or recombinant FSH in polycystic ovary syndrome patients: a prospective randomized analysis of cost-effectiveness

The aim of this prospective, randomized trial was to compare the clinical results and the cost-effectiveness of urinary FSH (uFSH) and recombinant FSH (rFSH) in ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients. One-hundred and seventy PCOS infertile patients undergoing IUI were enrolled, and protocols of ovarian stimulation with uFSH or rFSH were randomly assigned. The total number of cycles performed was 379 (182 and 197, respectively). The main outcome measures were the number of mature follicles, the days of stimulation, the number of ampoules and IU used per cycle, the biochemical/clinical pregnancy rates, the number of multiple pregnancies and the cost-effectiveness. No statistically significant differences were found in the follicular development, length of stimulation, pregnancy rates, delivery rates and multiple pregnancies between the two groups. In the uFSH group, the cost per cycle remained significantly lower (218.51 +/- 88.69 versus 312.22 +/- 118.12; P < 0.0001), even though a significantly higher number of IU of gonadotrophins were used (809.3 +/- 271.9 versus 589.1 +/- 244.7; P < 0.0001). The cost-effectiveness (i. e. within a group, the total cost of all cycles divided by no. of clinical pregnancies) was 1729.08 in the uFSH group and 3075.37 in the rFSH group. In conclusion, uFSH and rFSH demonstrated the same effectiveness in ovarian stimulation in IUI cycles in PCOS patients. The urinary preparation is more cost-effective due to the difference of its cost per IU.     

Ovulation induction in the new millennium: Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone versus human menopausal gonadotropin

The renewed interest in luteinizing hormone (LH), together with limited and decreasing health resources, make essential the comparison of high-cost, recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) preparations (devoid of LH) and human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) in terms of clinical efficacy. All published, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing rFSH versus hMG under different protocols of stimulation were examined. Eight true RCTs were included in this meta-analysis, recruiting 2031 participants. Data for ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) were extracted, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with the use of a fixed-effects model. Data for the meta-analysis were combined using RevMan software (using the Mantel–Haenszel method). Pooling the results of these RCTs showed no significant difference between rFSH and hMG regarding the different outcomes: ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate, OR 1.18 (95% CI 0.93–1.50); clinical pregnancy rate, OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.99–1.47), miscarriage rate, OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.70–2.16); multiple pregnancy rate, OR 1.35 (95% CI 0.96–1.90); incidence of moderate/severe OHSS, OR 1.79 (95% CI 0.74–4.33). However, there was significant reduction in the amount of gonadotropins in favor of hMG over rFSH. There was no significant heterogeneity of treatment effect across the trials. In conclusion, there is no clinically significant difference between hMG and rFSH in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Decision-makers should establish their choice of one drug over the other based on the most up-to-date evidence available.     

Effect of urinary versus recombinant FSH on clinical outcomes after frozen–thawed embryo transfers: a systematic review

Recent randomized trials, systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analyses have demonstrated the relative efficacy, and in some cases superiority, of urinary gonadotrophins (uFSH, human menopausal gonadotrophin) compared with recombinant FSH (rFSH). However, the effectiveness of frozen-embryo transfers (FET) following ovarian stimulation with uFSH versus rFSH in the fresh cycle has not been well investigated. The objective of this study was to determine whether there are differences in clinical outcomes in women undergoing FET according to the type of gonadotrophin used during ovarian stimulation. Following a meticulous search, all published comparative studies of FET using ovarian stimulation were reviewed. Data on clinical outcomes were extracted and systematically presented. Using the agonist long protocol for down-regulation, five trials provided extractable data for live-birth and ongoing pregnancy rates following FET, as well as the cumulative live-birth, ongoing pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates following fresh-embryo transfer and FET from the same cycle. There was no evidence of significant effect difference between the uses of uFSH versus rFSH regarding any of the outcomes. In conclusion there is insufficient evidence to determine whether the use of a certain type of gonadotrophin during ovarian stimulation affects the clinical outcomes in subsequent FET.Clinical efficiency in IVF procedures has been debated for years. Defining a unified goal, or endpoint, for IVF treatments has shown marked discrepancies among clinicians, regulatory bodies and organizations; with some regarding a clinical pregnancy, an ongoing pregnancy, a live-birth, or even a take-home baby as the primary outcome of IVF treatments. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of the use of urinary versus recombinant FSH on the results of frozen embryo transfers and the effect that this would have on the cumulative clinical results of IVF. This systematic review has shown that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether the use of a certain type of gonadotrophin during ovarian stimulation affects the clinical outcomes in subsequent frozen embryo transfers, such as live-birth rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate. With respect to cumulative rates, it is noted that no significant differences in live birth rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and clinical pregnancy rate following fresh and frozen transfer cycles. It is concluded that well-designed and powered studies are needed to determine possible effects of the use of a certain type of gonadotrophin during ovarian stimulation on the clinical outcomes in subsequent frozen thawed embryo transfers.     

FSH: urinary and recombinant

Infertility affects approximately 10-15% of couples. To enhance the chances of conception, assisted reproductive techniques (ART) have been improved and, in the last 5 years, thousands of babies have been delivered after IVF or ICSI procedures. To obtain an appropriate and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH), clinicians have introduced many drug protocols based on GnRH agonists or antagonists for pituitary down-regulation and FSH or HMG for ovarian stimulation. Currently FSH is the most common drug used for ovulation induction. It is a glycosylated protein with a molecular weight of 28000-30000Da, normally secreted by the anterior pituitary gland. The recombinant preparations of follicle stimulation hormone (r-FSH) are characterized by a higher level of purity, reduced batch to batch variability and no risk of infection. The purpose of this review was to establish the efficacy of different trials based on the use of r-FSH and urinary FSH (u-FSH) comparing published data from randomised studies on the ovulation induction for assisted reproductive techniques. Unfortunately, we did not find any paper with sufficient power to detect a clinically significant difference in pregnancy rates, however, recent meta-analysis among homogeneous trials indicates that the use of r-FSH is to be preferred to u-FSH because more oocytes were collected in cycles with better embryo quality and with more pregnancies. Recombinant FSH has a higher cost per ampoule than urinary FSH, but also a higher effectiveness. A recent cost-effectiveness analysis on follitropin alfa compared to urinary FSH-HP, using a Markov model, confirmed other previous studies that, considering the ongoing pregnancies beyond 12 weeks gestation, r-FSH is the most effective therapy for ovulation induction in ART.     

基因重组促卵泡激素(FSH)与尿源性FSH用于体外受精-胚胎移植的Meta分析

目的:比较体外受精(IVF)或卵胞质内单精子注射(ICSI)治疗周期基因重组促卵泡激素(rFSH)与尿源性促卵泡激素(uFSH)在控制性促排卵(COS)中的有效性。方法:检索Pub Med、EMBASE、Cochrane,CNKI及万方数据库中自rFSH上市至2013.09前发表的文章,收集rFSH与uFSH在IVF或ICSI中应用的随机对照研究,对纳入的研究进行质量评价,提取数据,采用Rev Man5.2软件对IVF或ICSI治疗周期的获卵数、FSH总用量、周期出生率、临床妊娠率、持续妊娠率、卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)的相对有效性进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入21篇研究,6 496个周期。总体上,rFSH较uFSH获卵数更多,FSH总用药量更少,差异有显著统计学意义;周期出生率和临床妊娠率r FSH和u FSH之间无显著性差异。结论:rFSH较uFSH在辅助生殖中具有更好的COS有效性。     

Follicle-stimulating hormone or human menopausal gonadotropin for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization cycles: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To reanalyze the results of using FSH alone and hMG during IVF treatment, taking into account the different protocols of administration of superactive GnRH agonist analogs. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. SETTING: The London Women's Clinic. PATIENT(S): Women undergoing IVF treatment. INTERVENTION(S): A meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials from 1985 to 1999 of the use of FSH versus hMG for ovarian stimulation during IVF treatment. The common Peto odds ratio was calculated with use of a fixed effect model. The overall log odds ratio was estimated after demonstrating the consistency or homogeneity of the study results. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate per cycle of IVF. RESULT(S): The results suggested that in the "long and short GnRH agonists protocol" of IVF, FSH, and hMG were equally effective in achieving ovarian stimulation, and there were no differences in the clinical pregnancy rates per cycle of IVF. However, in protocols where no pituitary desensitization was used, FSH alone was more efficacious. CONCLUSION(S): The optimum choice of gonadotropin preparation for ovarian stimulation during IVF treatment is influenced by the regimen of pituitary desensitization used. The optimum gonadotropin to be used when GnRH antagonists are used has yet to be determined.     

Pregnancy rates in varying age groups after in vitro fertilization: a comparison of follitropin alfa (Gonal F) and follitropin beta (Follistim)

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to assess the efficacy of two recombinant follicle-stimulating hormones, follitropin beta (Follistim, Organon, West Orange, NJ) and follitropin alfa (Gonal F, Serono, Norwell, Mass) on pregnancy rates in varying age groups of women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). STUDY DESIGN: Three hundred sixty-five IVF cycles were retrospectively compared, 233 by use of follitropin beta and 132 by use of follitropin alfa, both after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist down-regulation. Assignment to each medication was indiscriminate. The primary outcome measured was pregnancy evidenced by fetal heartbeat on ultrasonography. Secondary outcomes included days of stimulation, ampules per patient cycle, estradiol level on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration, total follicles present on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration, follicles greater than 14 mm, oocytes retrieved, mature eggs, fertilization rate, and embryos transferred. Outcomes were stratified by age, including women less than 36 years old, 36 to 39 years old, and more than 39 years old. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between follitropin beta and follitropin alfa in either the primary or secondary outcomes, although the pregnancy rate was significantly decreased with advancing age. CONCLUSION: Success rates are similar, when stratified by age, in women undergoing IVF with either follitropin beta or follitropin alfa.     

Highly purified HMG versus recombinant FSH for ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles

The objective of this study was to compare the live birth rates resulting from ovarian stimulation with highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (HP-HMG), which combines FSH and human chorionic gonadotrophin-driven LH activities, or recombinant FSH (rFSH) alone in women undergoing IVF cycles. An integrated analysis was performed of the raw data from two randomized controlled trials that were highly comparable in terms of eligibility criteria and post-randomization treatment regimens with either HP-HMG or rFSH for ovarian stimulation in IVF, following a long down-regulation protocol. All randomized subjects who received at least one dose of gonadotrophin in an IVF cycle (HP-HMG, n = 491; rFSH, n = 495) were included in the analysis. Subjects who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles were excluded. The superiority of one gonadotrophin preparation over the other was tested using the likelihood ratio test in a logistic regression analysis. The live birth rate per cycle initiated was 26.5% (130/491) with HP-HMG and 20.8% (103/495) with rFSH (P = 0.041). The odds ratio in favour of HP-HMG was 1.36 (95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.83). Thus, the findings of this integrated analysis demonstrate that ovarian stimulation with HP-HMG, following a long down-regulation protocol, in IVF cycles results in significantly more live births than stimulation with rFSH alone.     

Follitropin-alpha versus human menopausal gonadotropin in an in vitro fertilization program

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of recombinant FSH and urinary-derived hMG for ovarian stimulation during IVF. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data from IVF cycles conducted over 15 months. SETTING: University hospital IVF unit. PATIENT(S): Three hundred twenty-four women undergoing their first to sixth IVF cycle. INTERVENTION(S): After pituitary down-regulation, patients received recombinant FSH or hMG, according to personal choice. After hCG administration, patients underwent oocyte retrieval, oocyte fertilization, and embryo transfer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation rate and clinical ongoing pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval. RESULT(S): Patients who chose recombinant FSH were slightly younger than those who chose hMG (34.1 vs. 35.1 years, respectively). Although more embryos were transferred in the hMG group (3.6 vs. 3.2), the ongoing pregnancy and implantation rates were significantly higher in the recombinant FSH group (ongoing pregnancy rate, 50.0% vs. 36.2%). CONCLUSION(S): Recombinant FSH is more effective than hMG for ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles. This increased efficacy, which is achieved with fewer ampoules, is likely to offset the higher acquisition costs of recombinant FSH.     

Recombinant LH supplementation to recombinant FSH during induced ovarian stimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol: a meta-analysis

This study aims to compare the efficacy of recombinant LH (rLH) supplementation for ovarian stimulation in gonadotrophin-releasing hormone-antagonist protocol for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Search strategies included online surveys of databases. The fixed effects model was used for odds ratio (OR) and effect size (weighted mean difference, WMD). Five trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. When the meta-analysis was carried out, advantages were observed for the LH supplementation protocol with respect to higher serum oestradiol concentrations on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration P < 0.0001; WMD: 514, 95% CI 368, 660) and higher number of mature oocytes (P = 0.0098; WMD: 0.88, 95% CI 0.21, 1.54). However, these differences were not observed in the total amount of recombinant FSH (rFSH) administered, days of stimulation, number of oocyets retrieved, the clinical pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval, the implantation rate and miscarriage rate. This result demonstrates that the association of rLH with rFSH may prevent any decrease in oestradiol after antagonist administration and that a significantly higher number of mature oocytes was available for laboratory work. Nevertheless, it failed to show any statistically significant difference in clinically significant end-points in IVF (implantation and pregnancy rates). Additional randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results further.     

Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of HP-human FSH (Fostimon®) versus rFSH (Gonal-F®) in IVF-ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Clinical efficacy of human-derived follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) versus recombinant FSH (rFSH) in IVF-ICSI cycles has long been compared, but no clear evidence of the superiority of a preparation over the other has been found. Human gonadotropins have been often grouped together, but a different glycosylation may be present in each preparation, therefore influencing the specific bioactivity. To exclude confounding factors, a meta-analysis and a cost-effectiveness analysis were designed to compare effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a specific highly purified human FSH (HP-hFSH) (Fostimon®) versus rFSH (Gonal-F®) in IVF/ICSI cycles. Research methodology filters were applied in MEDLINE, Current Contents and Web of Science from 1980 to February 2012. Eight randomized trials met selection criteria. The meta-analysis showed no significant differences between rFSH and HP-hFSH treatment in live-birth rate (odds ratio [OR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63–1.11), clinical pregnancy rate (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68–1.07), number of oocytes retrieved, number of mature oocytes and days of stimulation. The cost-effectiveness ratio was €7174 in the rFSH group and €2056 in the HP-hFSH group. HP-hFSH is as effective as rFSH in ovarian stimulation for IVF-ICSI cycles, but the human preparation is more cost-effective.     

Controlled ovarian stimulation with exclusive FSH followed by stimulation with hCG alone, FSH alone or hMG

OBJECTIVE: To assess if low-dose hCG is similar to hMG and to rFSH in the late follicular phase. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective randomized controlled trial, 51 patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation received ovarian priming with rFSH and then received hCG (200 IU/day) (hCG group, n=17), hMG (225 IU/day) (hMG group, n=17) or rFSH (200 IU/day) (FSH group, n=17) in the late stage of follicular development. Parameters of follicular response and serum estradiol, progesterone and testosterone levels were assessed. RESULTS: Pre-ovulatory ovarian follicle occurrence and length of treatment were similar among the three treatment groups. Serum progesterone level on the day of pre-ovulatory hCG was significantly higher in the hCG group than in the hMG or rFSH group. Clinical pregnancy rates were similar for all groups. The total cost of treatment was significantly lower for the hCG group than for the groups supplemented with hMG or rFSH. CONCLUSIONS: LH in the form of low-dose hCG during the late follicular phase induced the same follicular pattern as hMG and rFSH after ovulation induction. The procedure using hCG produced pregnancy rates similar to those obtained using hMG and rFSH, even though the patients showed higher serum progesterone levels on the hCG day.     

Advantages of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone over human menopausal gonadotropin for ovarian stimulation in intrauterine insemination: a randomized clinical trial in unexplained infertility

Objective

To compare two different gonadotropin preparations, human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH), combined with clomiphene citrate (CC) in women with unexplained infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI).

Study design

In this prospective clinical trial, couples prepared for IUI cycles were randomly allocated to two groups either to receive CC and hMG (group A, n = 127) or CC and rFSH (group B, n = 132) for ovarian stimulation. Outcomes including rates of clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, OHSS, multiple pregnancy, cancelation, and live birth were compared between groups.

Results

Duration of gonadotropin therapy was significantly shorter in group B (5.1 ± 0.84 vs. 4.7 ± 0.8 days, CI = 95%, P < 0.001). The total dose of administered gonadotropin was also significantly lower in group B (386.9 ± 68.2 vs. 348.2 ± 56.3 IU, CI = 95%, P < 0.001). Dominant follicle number (>17 mm), mean follicular diameter, and endometrial thickness on the day of hCG injection were similar. Clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancies, abortion, live birth, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and cancelation rates were not statistically different between the groups.

Conclusion

IUI cycles in which rFSH had been administered may require shorter duration and a lower total gonadotropin dose.     

基础FSH/LH比值及晚卵泡期LH水平对体外受精-胚胎移植结局的影响

目的:探讨患者基础FSH/LH比值及控制性超促排卵(COH)时降调后hCG注射日血清LH水平对IVF-ET结局的影响及与COH各参数的关系。方法:回顾性分析首次进行IVF/ICSI-ET助孕、应用GnRH-a长方案降调节的不孕妇女,共427个周期。结果:ROC曲线显示FSH/LH比值与IVF-ET临床妊娠率无明显相关性;FSH/LH≥2与FSH/LH<2组间虽然临床妊娠率无差异,但FSH/LH≥2组Gn用量增加,获卵数少,优质胚胎数少,存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。hCG注射日血清LH≥0.65IU/L者妊娠率(55.8%)明显高于LH<0.65IU/L者(24.6%)。结论:基础FSH/LH比值增高能较早反映卵巢储备功能并指导超排方案及Gn用量;降调节后卵泡晚期(hCG注射日)的LH水平过低(<0.65IU/L),将会导致临床妊娠率下降。     

Oocyte quality in patients with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a self-controlled clinical study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the oocyte quality in patients with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). DESIGN: Self-controlled clinical study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENT(S): Twenty-two patients from our assisted reproductive technology (ART) program who developed severe OHSS during their first controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) (OHSS cycles) during a period of 10 years and had a second ART attempt performed in our center in which OHSS did not develop (control cycles). INTERVENTION(S): IVF and ICSI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Oocyte yield and quality, fertilization rate, embryo yield and quality, implantation rate, and pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): The total number of oocytes retrieved and the mean number of metaphase II oocytes were significantly higher in patients with OHSS than in control cycles. Fertilization rates were similar in both groups of ART cycles, and thus the number of viable embryos were significantly higher in OHSS cycles. Implantation and pregnancy rates were similar in OHSS and control cycles. Oocyte and embryo yield and quality were similar in early and late OHSS. Oocyte yield and quality, embryological outcome, and implantation and pregnancy rates were similar in patients with and without polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) both in cycles developing OHSS and control cycles. CONCLUSION(S): Oocyte quality is not compromised in severe OHSS cycles irrespective of whether patients had or did not have PCOS.