Direct Renin inhibition with aliskiren in obese patients with arterial hypertension

Current guidelines from the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure recommend first-line treatment with a thiazide diuretic but do not provide specific guidance for obese patients. The renin system is activated in obesity-associated arterial hypertension. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that the oral direct renin inhibitor aliskiren could provide additive blood pressure lowering in obese patients with hypertension (body mass index >or=30 kg/m(2); mean sitting diastolic blood pressure: 95 to 109 mm Hg) who had not responded to 4 weeks of treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg. After a 2- to 4-week washout, 560 patients received single-blind HCTZ (25 mg) for 4 weeks; 489 nonresponders were randomly assigned to double-blind aliskiren (150 mg), irbesartan (150 mg), amlodipine (5 mg), or placebo for 4 weeks added to HCTZ (25 mg), followed by 8 weeks on double the initial doses of aliskiren, irbesartan, or amlodipine. After 8 weeks of double-blind treatment (4 weeks on the higher dose), aliskiren/HCTZ lowered blood pressure by 15.8/11.9 mm Hg, significantly more (P<0.0001) than placebo/HCTZ (8.6/7.9 mm Hg). Aliskiren/HCTZ provided blood pressure reductions similar to those with irbesartan/HCTZ and amlodipine/HCTZ (15.4/11.3 and 13.6/10.3 mm Hg, respectively), with similar tolerability to placebo/HCTZ. Adverse event rates were highest with amlodipine/HCTZ because of a higher incidence of peripheral edema (11.1% versus 0.8% to 1.6% in other groups). In conclusion, combination treatment with aliskiren is a highly effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option for obese patients with hypertension who fail to achieve blood pressure control with first-line thiazide diuretic treatment.     

Enhanced antiarrhythmic efficacy of propafenone when used in combination with procainamide or quinidine

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combining propafenone with procainamide or quinidine for treating ventricular arrhythmias in patients in whom procainamide or quinidine therapy alone failed to suppress arrhythmias. In 30 patients, the addition of propafenone resulted in a significant reduction of premature ventricular contraction (PVC) frequency compared to drug-free baseline (406 PVC/hr vs 33, p less than 0.001) and to procainamide or quinidine monotherapy (211 PVC/hr vs 27, p less than 0.01). Propafenone alone was also more effective than either procainamide or quinidine and resulted in significant suppression of PVC compared to the drug-free state (406 PVC/hr vs 38, p less than 0.001). However, higher propafenone doses were necessary during monotherapy as compared to propafenone therapy combined with procainamide or quinidine (730 mg/day vs 480 mg/day, p less than 0.001). Of the 30 patients, 22 required an increase in propafenone dose during monotherapy as compared to combination therapy. Thus, propafenone is an effective antiarrhythmic agent when used in combination with type IA antiarrhythmic drugs. With these combinations, lower doses of propafenone can be utilized effectively than with propafenone alone.     

Aliskiren, an orally effective renin inhibitor, provides antihypertensive efficacy alone and in combination with valsartan

BACKGROUND: By blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) at its rate-limiting step, renin inhibition may provide improved RAAS suppression. We investigated the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects of the oral direct renin inhibitor aliskiren, alone or in combination with the angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial, 1123 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension underwent a 3 to 4 week single-blind placebo run-in and were then randomized in a modified factorial study design to receive once-daily, double-blind oral treatment with placebo, aliskiren monotherapy (75, 150, or 300 mg), valsartan monotherapy (80, 160, or 320 mg), aliskiren and valsartan in combination, or valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (160/12.5 mg). The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in mean sitting diastolic BP (DBP) at endpoint. RESULTS: Once-daily oral treatment with aliskiren 300 mg significantly (P < .0001) lowered mean sitting DBP and systolic BP (SBP) compared with placebo; aliskiren monotherapy demonstrated a safety and tolerability profile comparable to placebo. Changes in DBP and SBP were fitted to a first-order dose-response surface (lack-of-fit test, P = .65), which showed that aliskiren and valsartan alone and in combination produced dose-related reductions in DBP and SBP. Coadministration of aliskiren and valsartan produced a greater antihypertensive effect than either drug alone, comparable in magnitude to the effect of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide, with similar tolerability to the component monotherapies and to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Aliskiren monotherapy provides antihypertensive efficacy and placebo-like tolerability in patients with hypertension. Aliskiren and valsartan in combination may provide additive BP-lowering effects with maintained tolerability.     

Evaluation of antihypertensive therapy with the combination of olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide

BACKGROUND: Most patients with hypertension require more than one agent to control blood pressure (BP). The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the angiotensin II receptor blocker olmesartan medoxomil in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, factorial design study. After a placebo run-in period, eligible patients (n = 502) with a baseline mean seated diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) of 100 to 115 mm Hg were randomized to one of 12 groups: placebo, olmesartan medoxomil monotherapy (10, 20, or 40 mg/day, HCTZ monotherapy (12.5 or 25 mg/day), or one of six groups of olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ combination therapy. The primary endpoint was the change in mean trough SeDBP from baseline at week 8. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine whether at least one combination produced a larger reduction in SeDBP at week 8 than the individual corresponding component doses, but did not compare BP reductions with different combination doses. RESULTS: Olmesartan medoxomil plus HCTZ produced greater reductions in both SeDBP and seated systolic blood pressure (SeSBP) at week 8 than did monotherapy with either component. All olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ combinations significantly reduced SeDBP and SeSBP compared with placebo in a dose-dependent manner. Reductions from baseline in mean trough SeSBP/SeDBP were 3.3/8.2 mm Hg, 20.1/16.4 mm Hg, and 26.8/21.9 mm Hg with placebo, olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ 20/12.5 mg, and olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ 40/25 mg, respectively. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ combination therapy produced BP reductions of up to 26.8/21.9 mm Hg and was well tolerated.     

Renin profile, race, and antihypertensive efficacy with atenolol and labetalol

In this randomised double-blind parallel study, we compared the efficacy of labetalol and atenolol in a group of black (n = 33) and white (n = 34) hypertensives with uncomplicated essential hypertension after obtaining pretreatment renin profiles. After single-blind placebo (14-21 days), patients with standing diastolic BP between 105-119 mmHg were randomised to receive either labetalol (100-800 mg twice daily) or atenolol (50-100 mg once daily) to achieve a DBP less than 90 mmHg. Dosage titration occurred at weekly intervals for labetalol and biweekly for atenolol. The supine BP decrease with atenolol was -18/-14 vs. -6/-6 mmHg in whites vs. blacks respectively. With labetalol, it was -13/-12 in whites and -2/-7 mmHg in blacks. Standing BPs were: -19/-14 vs. -4/-5, whites vs. blacks with atenolol and -17/-17 vs. -19/-9 mmHg with labetalol. Neither labetalol nor atenolol was as effective in black compared with white hypertensives. The atenolol but not labetalol BP response was positively correlated with pretreatment renin values.     

Factorial antihypertensive study of an extended-release metoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide combination

BACKGROUND: To attain goal blood pressure (BP), many hypertensive patients require combination antihypertensive therapy. Thiazide diuretic/beta-blocker regimens lower BP, and clinical studies indicate that they reduce the risk for cardiovascular consequences of hypertension. Fixed-dose combination tablets can simplify multidrug treatment regimens. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, unbalanced factorial study (N = 1571) was designed to determine whether hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) and extended release (ER) metoprolol both contribute to an antihypertensive effect. Hypertensive adults with sitting diastolic BP (SiDBP) 95 to 114 mm Hg and systolic BP (SiSBP) <180 mm Hg received one of three hydrochlorothiazide doses (6.25 mg, 12.5 mg, or 25 mg), one of four ER-metoprolol doses (25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg), or one of nine of the combinations or placebo for 8 weeks. RESULTS: Blood pressure decreased with all combinations (P < .001 v placebo); reductions were dose related, ranging from 8.7 to 15.7 mm Hg (SiDBP) and 9.7 to 18.9 mm Hg (SiSBP) (model-derived values). Reductions with placebo were 5.3 (SiDBP) and 4.2 mm Hg (SiSBP). Both active agents contributed to the combination effect (P = .0015 for SiDBP; P = .0006 for SiSBP). Several low-dose combinations were approximately as effective as high doses of the individual agents (differences within 1 to 2.5 mm Hg). The adverse event discontinuation rate was 2.9%. Serum potassium decreased and uric acid increased with increasing doses of HCT. CONCLUSIONS: Extended-release metoprolol/hydrochlorothiazide is an effective antihypertensive combination that offers additive antihypertensive contributions from both components.     

Renin inhibition by aliskiren prevents atherosclerosis progression: comparison with irbesartan, atenolol, and amlodipine

Hypertension is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. Antihypertensive treatment, particularly blockade of the renin-angiotensin system, contributes to prevent atherosclerosis-mediated cardiovascular events. Direct comparison of different antihypertensive treatments on atherosclerosis and particularly plaque stabilization is sparse. ApoE(-/-) mice with vulnerable (2-kidney, 1-clip renovascular hypertension model) or stable (1-kidney, 1-clip renovascular hypertension model) atherosclerotic plaques were used. Mice were treated with aliskiren (renin inhibitor), irbesartan (angiotensin-receptor blocker), atenolol (beta-blocker), or amlodipine (calcium channel blocker). Atherosclerosis characteristics were assessed. Hemodynamic and hormonal parameters were measured. Aliskiren and irbesartan significantly prevented atherosclerosis progression in 2-kidney, 1-clip mice. Indeed, compared with untreated animals, plaques showed thinner fibrous cap (P<0.05); smaller lipid core (P<0.05); decreased media degeneration, layering, and macrophage content (P<0.05); and increased smooth muscle cell content (P<0.05). Interestingly, aliskiren significantly increased the smooth muscle cell compared with irbesartan. Despite similar blood pressure lowering, only partial plaque stabilization was attained by atenolol and amlodipine. Amlodipine increased plaque smooth muscle cell content (P<0.05), whereas atenolol decreased plaque inflammation (P<0.05). This divergent effect was also observed in 1-kidney, 1-clip mice. Normalizing blood pressure by irbesartan increased the plasma renin concentration (5932+/-1512 ng/mL per hour) more than normalizing it by aliskiren (16085+/-5628 ng/mL per hour). Specific renin-angiotensin system blockade prevents atherosclerosis progression. First, evidence is provided that direct renin inhibition mediates atherosclerotic plaque stabilization. In contrast, beta-blocker and calcium channel blocker treatment only partially stabilize plaques differently influencing atherogenesis. Angiotensin II decisively mediates plaque vulnerability. The plasma renin concentration measurement by an indirect method did not confirm the excessive increase of plasma renin concentration reported in the literature during aliskiren compared with irbesartan or amlodipine treatment.     

Comparison of aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy with hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy in older patients with stage 2 systolic hypertension: results of the ACTION study

Patients with stage 2 systolic hypertension require sizable blood pressure (BP) reductions to achieve recommended targets. This randomized double-blind study compared a single-pill combination of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren and hydrochlorothiazide (aliskiren/HCTZ) with HCTZ monotherapy in older patients (older than 55 years) with systolic BP ≥160 mm Hg and <200 mm Hg. After a 1- to 4-week washout, 451 patients were randomized to once-daily aliskiren/HCTZ 150/12.5 mg or HCTZ 12.5 mg for 1 week, and then double the doses for 7 weeks. Overall baseline BP was 168.8/91.4 mm Hg. At week 4 (primary) end point, aliskiren/HCTZ provided significantly greater BP reductions from baseline than HCTZ monotherapy (29.6/9.3 mm Hg vs 22.3/6.8 mm Hg) and resulted in a greater proportion of patients achieving BP goal of <140/90 mm Hg (51.1% vs 33.3%). Aliskiren/HCTZ therapy provides substantial BP reductions and may thus be a useful treatment option for older patients with stage 2 hypertension.     

Nicardipine in combination with other antihypertensive drugs: calcium antagonist and prazosin have no additive antihypertensive effect?

The combined antihypertensive effects of a new 4-dihydropyridine derivate calcium antagonist, nicardipine, and propranolol, atenolol, labetalol, clonidine, prazosin or captopril were studied in 14 hypertensive outpatients. Nicardipine in combination with atenolol or clonidine most effectively lowered blood pressure. Prazosin combined with nicardipine had no additive antihypertensive effect at the doses used. Clonidine and prazosin in combination with nicardipine were not well tolerated. The antihypertensive effect of the drug combinations seemed to be related to their bradycardic effect.     

Long-term efficacy of combination therapy with losartan and low-dose hydrochlorothiazide in patients with uncontrolled hypertension

We evaluated the long-term efficacy of losartan and low-dose hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in the treatment of hypertension. We enrolled 15 Japanese hypertensive outpatients whose 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure was >or= 135/80 mmHg after candesartan 8 mg (CND group; n = 10) monotherapy or amlodipine 5 mg (AML group; n = 5) monotherapy for 2 months or more. The monotherapy was then switched to losartan 50 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg combination therapy. Ambulatory blood pressure and indices of glucose and lipid metabolism were measured at the end of the monotherapy and after 3 and 12 months of the combination therapy. In the CND group, 24-hour blood pressure decreased significantly from 137 +/- 9/89 +/- 4 to 126 +/- 8/81 +/- 7 mmHg after 3 months (P < 0.05/ P < 0.001) and to 123 +/- 7/81 +/- 4 mmHg after 12 months (P < 0.01/P < 0.001). In the AML group, 24-hour blood pressure decreased significantly from 137 +/- 11/81 +/- 7 to 125 +/- 12/75 +/- 6 mmHg after 3 months (P < 0.05/P < 0.05) and to 124 +/- 9/77 +/- 7 mmHg after 12 months (P < 0.05/NS). There were significant decreases in systolic blood pressure during the daytime (6:00-21:30), nighttime (22:00-5:30) and early morning (6:00-8:00) after 12 months in both groups. No adverse changes in the indices of glucose or lipid metabolism were observed in either group. In conclusion, long-term combination therapy with losartan and low-dose hydrochlorothiazide was effective in the treatment of hypertensive patients whose blood pressure was not controlled by candesartan or amlodipine monotherapy alone.     

Comparison of aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy and amlodipine monotherapy in patients with stage 2 systolic hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Patients with stage 2 hypertension and diabetes are at high cardiovascular risk and require large blood pressure (BP) reductions to reach treatment goals. This randomized double-blind study compared aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combination therapy with amlodipine monotherapy in 860 patients with mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP) ≥160 mm Hg to <200 mm Hg and type 2 diabetes. Patients received either once-daily aliskiren/HCTZ 150/12.5 mg or amlodipine 5 mg for 1 week then force-titrated to double the doses for 7 weeks. Baseline BP was 167.7/91.4 mm Hg. At week 8 end point, aliskiren/HCTZ provided significantly greater reductions in msSBP than amlodipine (28.8 mm Hg vs 26.2 mm Hg; P<.05). Mean sitting diastolic BP reductions were similar with aliskiren/HCTZ (9.9 mm Hg) and amlodipine (9.0 mm Hg). Achievement of BP control (<130/80 mm Hg) was significantly greater with aliskiren/HCTZ (23.2%) than amlodipine (13.8%; P<.0001). Aliskiren/HCTZ provides substantial msSBP reductions and greater BP control rates than amlodipine, and offers an attractive treatment option for patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus.     

Renin inhibition in hypertension

Fifty years ago, investigators identified renin inhibition as the preferred pharmacologic approach to blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. Renin is a monospecific enzyme that catalyzes the rate-limiting step in the synthesis of angiotensin II. Amplified enzymatic activity and additional physiological effects occur when renin and pro-renin bind to the (pro)renin receptor. Until very recently, development of clinically effective renin inhibitors remained elusive. Molecular modeling was used to develop aliskiren, a potent, low-molecular-weight, nonpeptide, direct renin inhibitor with sufficient bioavailability to produce sustained suppression of plasma renin activity after oral administration. In patients with hypertension, aliskiren produces dose-dependent blood pressure (BP) reduction and 24-h BP control up to a dose of approximately 300 mg once daily; at these doses, aliskiren shows placebo-like tolerability. Its antihypertensive potency is approximately equivalent to that of angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and diuretics. After abrupt withdrawal, persistent BP reduction and prolonged suppression of plasma renin activity is observed. When combined with diuretics, fully additive BP reduction is seen. When given with an angiotensin receptor blocker, aliskiren produces significant additional BP reduction indicative of complimentary pharmacology and more complete renin-angiotensin system blockade. Clinical trials are currently underway assessing the effects of aliskiren combined with an angiotensin receptor blocker on intermediate markers of end organ damage, and long-term end point trials are planned. The results of these studies will ultimately determine the place of renin inhibition and aliskiren in the treatment of hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders. The effect of aliskiren on receptor-bound renin and pro-renin is the subject of active investigation.     

The antihypertensive efficacy of the combination of irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Irbesartan Multicenter Study Group

In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial, 178 patients with ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (BP) > or =85 mm Hg and seated diastolic BP (SeDBP) 95-110 mm Hg received either once-daily irbesartan 75 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg, irbesartan 150 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg, or placebo for 8 weeks to assess reductions in 24-hour ambulatory BP and office BP. Safety and tolerability of all treatment regimens were also evaluated. BP results and therapeutic response (trough SeDBP normalized to <90 mm Hg) were expressed as change from baseline to Week 8. Mean reductions in 24-hour ambulatory BP and office seated BP for irbesartan/HCTZ combinations were significantly greater compared with placebo (all, p<0.01). More patients were normalized with irbesartan/HCTZ (65%-69%) than placebo (24%, p<0.01). The frequency of adverse events was similar in all groups. Irbesartan/HCTZ given once-daily appears to be a well-tolerated, safe, and effective antihypertensive treatment.     

Antihypertensive effectiveness of amlodipine in combination with hydrochlorothiazide

The antihypertensive and metabolic effects of amlodipine, a new calcium-channel blocker, in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) were compared with those of HCTZ in combination with placebo. After four weeks open treatment with HCTZ 50 mg/d, 20 patients were blindly allocated to receive placebo and 20 to receive amlodipine, if their diastolic arterial pressure supine and upright was 95 to 115 mm Hg. The patients were seen in the clinic every two weeks for 12 more weeks, where their arterial pressure (AP) and heart rate (HR) were measured supine and upright. Hydrochlorothiazide was kept at 50 mg/d, but amlodipine was increased from 2.5 to 5.0 to 10.0 mg/d as needed. At end of weeks 4 and 16 the AP and HR were measured hourly for 12 hours and 24 hours later. Serial clinical and laboratory evaluations including lipid profiles were done on all patients. Amlodipine treated patients had lower arterial pressures in both the supine and upright positions (P less than .001), higher HDL levels (P less than .05) and lower CHOL:HDL and LDL:HDL ratios (P less than .01), than placebo-treated patients. Also, amlodipine-treated patients had lower SGOT and SGPT levels (P less than .01) than placebo-treated patients. No changes in HR or weight were noted between the two groups of patients. Clinical side effects were few and mild and not different between the two groups. We conclude: (1) the addition of amlodipine to HCTZ enhanced its antihypertensive action; (2) amlodipine was safe and well tolerated; and (3) amlodipine, perhaps, has a favorable effect on lipids.     

Renin inhibition in hypertension.

Fifty years ago, investigators identified renin inhibition as the preferred pharmacologic approach to blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. Renin is a monospecific enzyme that catalyzes the rate-limiting step in the synthesis of angiotensin II. Amplified enzymatic activity and additional physiological effects occur when renin and pro-renin bind to the (pro)renin receptor. Until very recently, development of clinically effective renin inhibitors remained elusive. Molecular modeling was used to develop aliskiren, a potent, low-molecular-weight, nonpeptide, direct renin inhibitor with sufficient bioavailability to produce sustained suppression of plasma renin activity after oral administration. In patients with hypertension, aliskiren produces dose-dependent blood pressure (BP) reduction and 24-h BP control up to a dose of approximately 300 mg once daily; at these doses, aliskiren shows placebo-like tolerability. Its antihypertensive potency is approximately equivalent to that of angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and diuretics. After abrupt withdrawal, persistent BP reduction and prolonged suppression of plasma renin activity is observed. When combined with diuretics, fully additive BP reduction is seen. When given with an angiotensin receptor blocker, aliskiren produces significant additional BP reduction indicative of complimentary pharmacology and more complete renin-angiotensin system blockade. Clinical trials are currently underway assessing the effects of aliskiren combined with an angiotensin receptor blocker on intermediate markers of end organ damage, and long-term end point trials are planned. The results of these studies will ultimately determine the place of renin inhibition and aliskiren in the treatment of hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders. The effect of aliskiren on receptor-bound renin and pro-renin is the subject of active investigation.     

Comparative efficacy and safety of combination aliskiren/amlodipine and amlodipine monotherapy in African Americans with stage 2 hypertension

Initial multiple drug therapy for hypertension achieves greater and quicker reductions and higher blood pressure (BP) control rates than monotherapy. This 8-week, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of the initial combination of aliskiren/amlodipine with amlodipine monotherapy in African Americans with stage 2 hypertension. After a 1- to 4-week washout, patients received aliskiren/amlodipine 150/5 mg or amlodipine 5 mg for 1 week and then were force-titrated to aliskiren/amlodipine 300/10 mg or amlodipine 10 mg for 7 weeks. At week 8, greater reductions in mean sitting systolic BP were obtained with aliskiren/amlodipine (n = 220) than with amlodipine (n = 223) (least squares mean change [standard error of the mean], -34.1 [1.14] mm Hg vs -28.9 [1.12] mm Hg; P<.001). Ambulatory and central BP measures were consistent with clinic BP findings, although these were conducted in a small subset of patients (n = 94 in ambulatory BP monitoring substudy and n = 136 for central BP). More patients achieved goal BP (<140/90 mm Hg) with aliskiren/amlodipine than with amlodipine at week 8 (57.3% vs 48.0%; P = .051). Both treatment groups had similar adverse event rates (35.0% and 32.7%, respectively). The most common adverse events were peripheral edema (7.7% with aliskiren/amlodipine and 9.0% with amlodipine), headache, fatigue, and nausea. The combination of aliskiren/amlodipine reduced peripheral, ambulatory, and central BP more than amlodipine alone with similar tolerability in African Americans with stage 2 hypertension.     

Long-term efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan as monotherapy and in combination with other antihypertensive medications

This open-label, multicenter, extension study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan 80 mg administered alone or with HCTZ and/or other antihypertensive agents over a maximal 1-year treatment period. Of the 690 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension completing the preceding 6-week, randomized trial (comparing telmisartan 80 mg with losartan 50 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg combination therapy), 489 patients (70.9%) continued in this extension study. A fixed-titration regimen was employed: all patients received telmisartan 80 mg initially, with the stepwise addition of HCTZ 12.5 mg, HCTZ 25 mg and/or other antihypertensives to attain diastolic blood pressure (DBP) control (<90 mmHg). At the final visit, DBP control was achieved in 70.0% (194/277) of patients maximally titrated to telmisartan 80 mg, 55.8% (48/86) titrated to telmisartan 80 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg, 54.7% (47/86) titrated to telmisartan 80 mg + HCTZ 25 mg, and 64.7% (22/34) titrated to telmisartan 80 mg + other antihypertensive +/- HCTZ (12.5 or 25 mg). The DBP and systolic blood pressure (SBP) reductions observed in the preceding randomized trial continued during extension treatment. Progressively greater blood pressure reductions occurred with the sequential addition of HCTZ and other antihypertensives. Adding HCTZ 12.5 mg to telmisartan 80 mg was particularly effective at enhancing antihypertensive efficacy. All treatments were well tolerated. Thus, telmisartan 80 mg administered alone or with HCTZ (12.5 or 25 mg) and/or other antihypertensives maintains a clinically significant therapeutic effect over the long term in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.     

A "lipo-protective" effect of a fixed combination of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide in antihypertensive therapy.

Increases of triglycerides and total cholesterol have been reported during treatment with antihypertensive drugs, most notably with beta blockers and diuretics. ACE inhibitors, on the other hand, are not known for having a negative effect on lipid profile. To evaluate the effects of a fixed combination of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide on lipid metabolism, blood pressure, and quality of life, we performed an open prospective study. A total of 2,154 patients with or without hypercholesterolemia, but not receiving lipid lowering drugs, were enrolled. Of the 1891 evaluable patients at baseline, 34.1% had a moderate risk with total cholesterol between 5.2 and 6.5 mmol/l (mean 5.8 mmol/l) and 41.3% had a high coronary heart disease (CHD) risk with total cholesterol higher than 6.5 mmol/l (mean 7.3 mmol/l). After six months of treatment, the median cholesterol level in the moderate risk group decreased from 5.8 to 5.4 mmol/l (p less than 0.0003) and in the high risk group from 7.3 to 6.3 mmol/l (p less than 0.0001). Triglycerides also decreased, whereas high density lipoprotein (HDL) increased in both risk groups. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure fell as expected and quality of life improved. The fixed combination was well tolerated. We observed a significant improvement of lipid profile in patients with mild to moderate hypertension while undergoing treatment with the fixed combination of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide. We suggest that captopril may balance the negative effects of hydrochlorothiazide on lipid metabolism in patients with hypertension and concomitant hyperlipidemia.     

Fixed-dose combination therapy: reduction of side effects with enhanced tolerance and antihypertensive efficacy

Despite the availability of many newer antihypertensive agents, hypertensive patients remain at a higher risk of premature death than the general population. This persistence of elevated morbidity and mortality may be accounted for by the frequent failure to achieve adequate blood pressure reduction despite an extensive range of available antihypertensive agents. Such considerations have led to the reassessment of the potential role of fixed-dose combination agents. The antihypertensive efficacy may be enhanced when two classes of agents are combined. In addition, combination therapy enhances tolerability because one drug of fixed combination can antagonize some of the adverse effects of the second drug. Fixed-dose combination therapy simplifies the treatment regimen, preventing treatment failures that might result from missed doses.