Neurodevelopmental correlates of behavioural and emotional problems in a neuropaediatric sample

Most research does not address the overlap between neurodevelopmental disorders when investigating concomitant mental health problems. The purpose of the present study was to examine the association of intellectual disability (ID), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with the presence of behavioural and emotional problems after controlling for other well-known correlates and risk factors. The sample included 4- to 18-year-old children who attended neuropaediatric clinics (N = 331). After controlling for adversity, age, gender, other developmental/neurological disorders, parental emotional problems, and parenting strategies, the presence of ADHD but not ASD or ID was uniquely associated with behaviour problems. Neither ADHD nor ASD nor ID was significantly associated with emotional problems after controlling for other risk factors. However, ADHD, ASD and behavioural/emotional disorders but not ID were significantly associated with functional impairment in everyday activities after controlling for other risk factors. Because children with neurodevelopmental disorders have complex needs, a holistic approach to diagnosis and interventions is highly warranted, including the assessment and treatment of behavioural and emotional disorders.     

Psychometric evaluation of a Dutch version of the Mini PAS‐ADD for assessing psychiatric disorders in adults with different levels of intellectual disability

Background People with intellectual disabilities (ID) have an increased vulnerability to develop psychiatric problems. Moreover, the early recognition and the accurate diagnosis of psychiatric disorders in the population of persons with ID are challenging. Method A Dutch version of the Mini PAS‐ADD, which is a screening instrument for identification of mental health problems in people with ID, was evaluated in terms of internal consistency, interinformant reliability, item grouping and criterion validity based on a large‐scale random sample (n = 377) and a clinical sample (n = 99) of adults with ID. Results The Dutch version of the Mini PAS‐ADD showed moderate internal consistency, and moderate concordance among informants. Both aspects of the reliability were comparable for different levels of ID. A factor analysis largely confirmed the scale structure. Concurrent validity with the Reiss Screen for Maladaptive Behavior was high for the Depression, Psychosis and Autism scale. The outcome of the criterion‐validity analysis indicated high specificity. The sensitivity for specific psychiatric disorders by the corresponding scales was moderate, but the general sensitivity for the presence of psychopathology on the basis of any of the scales was satisfying. Conclusions The present research reconfirmed the use of the Mini PAS‐ADD as a primary screening device for the identification of mental health problems among people with ID.     

Emotional and behavioural problems in children and young people with autism spectrum disorder in specialist autism schools

We investigated emotional and behavioural problems in a sample (N = 615) of children and young people with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), most of whom also had intellectual disability (ID), attending specialist autism schools. High rates of parent- and teacher-reported problems were recorded. Teacher-reported levels of hyperactivity were higher in younger children. Teacher- but not parent-reported levels of conduct problems and hyperactivity were highest in children without phrase speech. Greater use of mental health services was associated with higher levels of emotional and behavioural problems, but only a minority of participants had accessed mental health services in the previous 6 months.     

Prevalence of Psychiatric Diagnoses and Challenging Behaviors in a Community-Based Population of Adults With Intellectual Disability

Previous research has suggested substantial variation in prevalence rates of psychiatric disorders in individuals with intellectual disability (ID) and also differential patterns of associations between psychiatric disorders and challenging behaviors in people with ID. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence rate of specific psychiatric disorders and challenging behaviors and the relationship between them in a community-based sample of individuals with ID. A community-based sample of 159 adults primarily with mild and moderate ID was surveyed for the presence of psychiatric disorders and challenging behaviors using the Behavior Problem Inventory and the Psychiatric Assessment Schedule (PAS-ADD). Individuals who met threshold on the PAS-ADD were subsequently evaluated using the Mini PAS-ADD Interview. Screening for psychiatric disorders using the PAS-ADD indicated a prevalence rate of 10%. There was a large discrepancy between the overall rate of challenging behaviors (45%) and the rate of psychiatric disorders identified by the Mini PAS-ADD Interview (6%). However, the rate of more severe behavior problems (8%) was closer to the rate of psychiatric disorders (6%). Thirty-one percent of people with severe challenging behaviors also were rated as having psychiatric disorders and odd ratio analysis indicates that individuals with severe challenging behaviors are substantially more likely to present with a psychiatric disorder. However, the relationship between different topographies of challenging behaviors and discrete diagnostic categories of psychiatric disorders appears to be unclear. This study reports a low prevalence of psychiatric disorders in a community-based population. The presence of severe challenging behaviors appears to have some association with psychiatric disorders but does not appear specific to discrete diagnostic categories. Clinicians and researchers need to debate the validity of considering challenging behaviors atypical manifestations of psychiatric disorders.     

The association between severity of intellectual disability and psychiatric symptomatology

Background Mental illness is more prevalent in people with intellectual disabilities (ID) than in the normal population. The association between mental illness and severity of ID is also of importance in the understanding and treatment of maladaptive and challenging behaviours. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between severity of ID and prevalence of mental illness. Methods Using The Mini PAS‐ADD, an instrument designed to identify psychiatric symptoms in people with ID, informants were interviewed about the presence of symptoms in 96 participants with moderate, severe and profound ID, and asked about the use of psychotropic medication. Results Mental illness, particularly anxiety, depression and psychosis, was far more prevalent in participants with moderate ID than in people with severe and profound ID. The use of psychotropic medication was not significantly different between the groups. Conclusions The prevalence of psychiatric illness decreases with severity of ID. The usefulness of psychiatric illness models, in explaining maladaptive and challenging behaviours, also decreases with severity of ID. Drug treatment may become more complicated, and behavioural and environmental interventions may become relatively more important, as severity of ID increases.     

Epilepsy and intellectual disability: Does epilepsy increase the likelihood of co-morbid psychopathology?

Although epilepsy is particularly common among people with intellectual disability (ID) it remains unclear whether it is associated with an increased likelihood of co-morbid psychopathology. We therefore investigated rates of mental health problems and other clinical characteristics in patients with ID and epilepsy (N = 156) as compared to patients with ID but no epilepsy (N = 596). All participants were consecutive referrals to specialist mental heath services. Specialist clinicians agreed on the mental health diagnoses by applying ICD-10 clinical criteria using information gained from interviews with key informants and the patients. Bivariate and multivariate analyses showed that patients with epilepsy were more likely to live in residential housing and have severe ID in line with previous evidence. However, the presence of epilepsy was not associated with an increased likelihood of co-morbid psychopathology. On the contrary, rates of mental health problems, including schizophrenia spectrum, personality and anxiety disorders, were significantly lower among patients with epilepsy. The results are discussed in the context of mood-stabilizing and other psychotropic effects of anti-epileptic drugs in adults with ID and epilepsy, as well as possible diagnostic overshadowing.     

The behavioural profile of psychiatric disorders in persons with intellectual disability

Background Problems associated with psychiatric diagnoses could be minimized by identifying behavioural clusters of specific psychiatric disorders. Methods Sixty persons with intellectual disability (ID) and behavioural problems, aged 12–55 years, were assessed with standardized Indian tools for intelligence and adaptive behaviour. Clinical diagnoses were conferred as per International Classification of Diseases – 10th Revision (ICD-10) criteria. Subsequently Reiss Screen for Maladaptive Behaviors (RSMB) and AAMD Adaptive Behavior Scale-Part II were administered independently. Results Aggression and rebellious behaviours were more common in affective disorders and personality disorders. Psychotic and paranoid features were significantly more in psychosis group. Those with behavioural problems had significantly low scores on the sub-scales of RSMB. Conclusion RSMB and AAMD Adaptive Behavior Scale-Part II will be useful to identify behavioural clusters, which will complement clinical psychiatric diagnoses in individuals with ID.     

Psychopathology in Children and Adolescents with Autism Compared to Young People with Intellectual Disability

Autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder with a specific pattern of behavioural, communication and social problems. Additional mental health problems are often poorly understood and undetected. This study investigates the level and pattern of emotional and behavioural problems in young people with autism compared with children with intellectual disability (ID). Subjects were 381 young people with autism and a representative group of 581 Australian young people with ID aged 4–18 years. Parents/carers provided details of the emotional and behavioural problems of their child using the Developmental Behaviour Checklist (DBC-P). Young people with autism were found to suffer from significantly higher levels of psychopathology than young people with ID. The implications of this finding are discussed.     

Factors associated with the risk of behaviour problems in adolescents with severe intellectual disabilities

Background Little is known about the factors affecting the risk of behavioural and emotional problems in young people with severe intellectual disability (ID), although such evidence as there is suggests that there may be differences between the pattern of risk factors in this group and those that operate in general population samples of the same age. Method From a sample of 111 children with severe ID who had been initially identified from the registers of six special schools at 4–11 years, 82 were traced and reassessed on average 5 years 4 months later. The relationships between potential risk factors and behaviour problems, reported here for 11:00–17:04 year olds, were assessed by means of parental interview conducted in the family home. Results Behaviour problems were associated with the severity of ID and the severity of autistic symptomatology. Perhaps surprisingly, they were also more common in pre‐pubertal than post‐pubertal adolescents. Family factors such as a history of interrupted/disrupted maternal care, parental criticism of the child and aggressive parental disciplinary practices were also associated with behaviour problems, although the direction of causation was unclear. Several factors, including gender, social disadvantage and epilepsy, well established as risk factors in children without ID, were not significantly associated with behaviour problems in the present sample. Conclusion The findings suggest that the pattern of factors associated with behaviour problems in children with severe ID differs from that found both in the general population and in children with mild ID.     

Associations Between Mental Health Problems and Challenging Behavior in Adults With Intellectual Disabilities: A Test of the Behavioral Equivalents Hypothesis

Introduction: Current research findings in the field of intellectual disabilities (ID) regarding the relationship between mental health problems and challenging behavior are inconclusive and/or contradictory. The aim of this study was to further investigate the putative association between these two highly prevalent phenomena in people with ID, and specifically to explore the hypothesis that challenging behaviors may be behavioral equivalents of mental health problems. Methods: A sample of 160 adults accessing secondary care ID health services was assessed using five validated measures. These included ratings of severity of disability, mental health problems, autism behaviors, physical health problems, and four different aspects of challenging behavior. In conjunction with demographic information, four multiple regression analyses were undertaken to examine the interaction between mental health problems (moderated by severity of disability) and ratings of overall challenging behavior, aggression, self-injurious behavior, and stereotypy. In each case, age, gender, autism, and physical health problems were included as covariates. Results: There was a statistically significant association between mental health problems and ratings of overall challenging behavior, as well as the moderating effect of severity of disability. Importantly, the positive association between mental health problems and challenging behavior was only significant at more severe levels of disability. Conclusions: These findings support the “behavioral equivalents” hypothesis for mental health problems and challenging behaviors. However, further longitudinal research is required before this hypothesis can be considered unequivocally supported.     

Behaviour and psychiatric disorders of people with mental handicaps living in the community

ABSTRACT. Psychiatric and behavioural disorders were found to be relatively common in a sample of 318 individuals vrith a mental handicap living in the community. Many of those referred for psychiatric assessment had other nonpsychiatric problems. The presence of these other needs has been recognized, and has led to the emergence of a distinct group of professionals, therapists and support staff with whom psychiatrists need to haise to devise an adequate and effective care plan. TTiis study also highlights the need for the development of a methodology for assessing psychiatric disorders in people with a mental handicap.     

Demographic and clinical characteristics of people with intellectual disabilities with and without substance abuse disorders in a Medicaid population

Little is known about the demographic and clinical characteristics of people with intellectual disabilities and substance abuse problems. Drawing on health care billing claims for people with Medicaid coverage aged 12-99 years, the characteristics of people with intellectual disability and a history of substance abuse (N=9,484) were explored and compared with people with intellectual disability but without substance abuse. Age- and/or gender-adjusted odds ratios were derived from logistic regression analyses to consider differences in demographic and clinical diagnoses. People with intellectual disability and substance abuse constituted 2.6% of all people with intellectual disability, most of whom had a diagnosis of mild or moderate intellectual disability. People with intellectual disability and substance abuse problems were, on average, 2 years older than the comparison group and less likely to be White. The sample was more likely than the comparison group to have serious mental illness or depression and substance abuse-related disorders were not prevalent. These data provide a comparison point for existing studies of mental health diagnoses as well as new information about substance abuse disorders. Implications relate to the identification of substance abuse among people with intellectual disabilities as well as the establishment of demographic and clinical correlates.     

Multiple exposure to life events and clinical psychopathology in adults with intellectual disability

BACKGROUND: Relatively few studies have examined the impact of life events on mental health in the field of intellectual disability (ID), despite the possibility that adults with ID and mental health problems might be particularly vulnerable to multiple events. AIMS: To examine the impact of multiple life events on mental health in people with ID. METHOD: The sample consisted of 281 men and women with ID consecutively referred to a specialist mental health service in South-East London. For each participant, key informants completed the PAS-ADD Life Events list, while psychiatric diagnoses were made by clinicians based on ICD-10 criteria. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis revealed that single exposure to life events was significantly associated with female gender, schizophrenia, personality disorders and depression. However, multiple exposure to life events was associated with personality disorder, depression and adjustment reaction. CONCLUSIONS: The present results suggest an increased vulnerability to life events in people with ID. A better understanding of the relationship between life events and mental health can enhance the development of interventions, which may benefit substantially this particular population.     

Manifestations of depression in people with intellectual disability

The symptoms of 36 people with varying degrees of intellectual disability (ID) who had had an ICD-I0 depressive syndrome in the preceding year were compared with 46 non-depressed people with comparable degrees of ID. Throughout the spectrum of ID, symptoms of depressed affect and sleep disturbance were significantly different between the groups. While symptoms in people with mild ID were reflected in the standard diagnostic criteria, this was not the case in people with moderate and severe ID. With increasing disability there was a move towards ‘behavioural depressive equivalents’ such as aggression, screaming and self-injurious behaviour. Diagnostic criteria for depression among people with severe ID, should place more emphasis on behavioural ‘depressive equivalents’.     

Family impact in intellectual disability, severe mental health disorders and mental health disorders in ID. A comparison

Family impact (or family burden) is a concept born in the field of mental health that has successfully been exported to the ambit of intellectual disability (ID). However, differences in family impact associated with severe mental health disorders (schizophrenia), to ID or to mental health problems in ID should be expected. Seventy-two adults with intellectual disability clients of the Carmen Pardo-Valcarce Foundation's sheltered workshops and vocational employment programmes in Madrid (Spain), 203 adults diagnosed with schizophrenia from four Spanish Community Mental Health Services (Barcelona, Madrid, Granada and Navarra) and 90 adults with mental health problems in ID (MH-ID) from the Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu Health Care Site in Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona (Spain) were asked to participate in the present study along with their main caregivers. Family impact experienced by caregivers was assessed with the ECFOS-II/SOFBI-II scale (Entrevista de Carga Familiar Objetiva y Subjetiva/Objective and Subjective Family Burden Interview). In global terms, results showed that the higher family impact was found between caregivers to people with MH-ID. The interaction of both conditions (ID and mental health problems) results in a higher degree of burden on families than when both conditions are presented separately. There was also an impact in caregivers to people with schizophrenia, this impact being higher than the one detected in caregivers to people with intellectual disability. Needs of caregivers to people with disability should be addressed specifically in order to effectively support families.     

Diagnosis of depression in people with severe/profound intellectual disability

The Marston 30 Symptoms Checklist for detecting depression was used to determine whether or not the notion of ‘depressive equivalents’ can provide a few of the core characteristics necessary for the diagnosis of depressive disorders in people with severe/profound intellectual disability (ID). Diagnoses of major depression were made by a psychiatrist using the DSM‐III‐R criteria, combined with information from records, staff, team, parents, behaviour profiles, direct observations, mental status and follow‐up visits. Twenty‐two people with ID fulfilled the selection criteria from a larger sample of 150 patients who had been evaluated in 350 contact visits. Scores on the checklist for major depression for 15 subjects with severe/profound ID were similar to the core characteristics for diagnosis of major depression by DSM‐III‐R criteria. Evidence was found for the presence of depressive equivalents in the subjects, but these appeared to be secondary. The 15 participants with severe/profound ID were observed mostly during the depressive phase of bipolar I and bipolar II disorder, and major depression, recurrent type. Melancholic features were prominent in their presentation. Further studies of people with ID are needed to determine whether depressive equivalents are more prominent in cases of major depression with atypical features than in cases of major depression with melancholic features.     

People with intellectual disability, sensory impairments and behaviour disorder: a case series

Background Sensory impairments (SIs) are more prevalent in people with intellectual disability (ID). Both conditions lead to higher rates of emotional and behavioural problems than in the general population. The identification of psychiatric disorders in this group can be difficult, particularly in those with severe ID and limited communication skills. Method The present paper presents a series of 18 case reports of individuals with ID, SI and behavioural problems. Results The majority of cases were young male caucasians with congenital rubella syndrome and autistic spectrum disorder, referred because of self‐injurious behaviour (SIB) or aggression. Nine cases were treated with autidepressants, five underwent environmental changes and two had medication reduced. All showed some improvement. Conclusions The benefits of comprehensive assessments, the use of standardized assessment tools and trials of treatments are discussed in the context of making psychiatric diagnoses.     

Observations on the use of the ICD-10 Guide for Mental Retardation

In acknowledgement of the challenges posed by the diagnosis of mental disorders in people with intellectual disability (ID), the World Health Organization (WHO) has recently published a multi-axial guide to assist clinicians in applying the ICD-10 to this group of people. The WHO has invited users to review of the ICD-10 Guide for Mental Retardation. In order to review its usefulness in clinical practice, the present authors used the Guide together with the ICD-10 in the psychiatric assessment of 106 young people with ID, and emotional and behavioural problems of varying severity. Strengths and weaknesses in the utility of the Guide were noted. As a result of the clinical audit process, the present authors identified a number of inconsistencies, significant gaps and assertions unsupported by the available literature in the Guide. They also noted aspects of the ICD-10 itself which are problematic when applied to people with ID. Despite these limitations, the Guide is a valuable first attempt to establish a standardized structure for multi-axial diagnosis in this population. A number of suggestions for major changes and refinements to future editions are made, and a strategy for development of research to establish validity and reliability is proposed.     

Risk of mental disorders in subjects with intellectual disability in the Lundby cohort 1947–97

The Lundby Study is a prospective cohort study, which has followed a Swedish unselected community sample between 1 July 1947 and 1 July 1997. The aim was to study the risks of mental morbidity and different DSM-IV disorders in subjects with intellectual disability (ID) in the Lundby cohort between 1 July 1947 to 30 June 1997. The diagnosis of ID was re-evaluated according to DSM-IV in subjects who had been considered to have ID between 1947 and 1997. Multiple sources of information were used to obtain best estimate consensus diagnoses of mental disorders. The relative risk of mental disorder was 1.34 in subjects with ID as compared with the reference group. Dual diagnosis was more prevalent in mild ID than in moderate ID. No subject with severe ID was diagnosed with mental disorder. The cumulative incidence of any mental disorder in subjects with ID was 44%. The most common DSM-IV diagnoses were: Mood Disorders (11.5%), Anxiety Disorders (11.5%), Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders (8%), Mental Disorder NOS Due to a General Medical Condition (8%), Dementia (3.8%) and Alcohol Abuse (1.9%). Mental disorders were more common in subjects with ID than in the reference group.