A comparative study of skeletal and dental stability between rigid and wire fixation for mandibular advancement

This study examined the skeletal and dental stability after mandibular advancement surgery with rigid or wire fixation for up to 2 years after the surgery. Subjects for this multisite, prospective, randomized, clinical trial were assigned to receive rigid (n = 64) or wire (n = 63) fixation. The rigid cases received three 2-mm bicortical position screws bilaterally and elastics; the wire fixation subjects received inferior border wires and 6 weeks of skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with 24-gauge wires. Cephalometric films were obtained before surgery, and at 1 week, 8 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Skeletal and dental changes were analyzed using the Johnston's analysis. Before surgery both groups were balanced with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. Mean anterior advancement of the mandibular symphasis was 5.5 mm (SD, 3.2) in the rigid group and 5.6 mm (SD, 3.0) in the wire group. Two years after surgery, mandibular symphasis was unchanged in the rigid group, whereas the wire group had 26% of sagittal relapse. Dental compensation occurred to maintain the corrected occlusion, with the mandibular incisor moving forward in the wire group and posteriorly in the rigid group. However, at 2 years after surgery, when most subjects were without braces, the overjet and molar discrepancy had relapsed similarly in both groups.     

Rigid versus wire fixation for mandibular advancement: Skeletal and dental changes after 5 years

The bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is the most common surgical procedure for the correction of mandibular retrognathism. Commonly, the proximal and distal segments are fixated together with either wire or rigid screws or plates. The purpose of this study was to compare long-term (5 years) skeletal and dental changes between wire and rigid fixation after BSSO. In this multisite, prospective, randomized clinical trial, the rigid fixation group received three 2-mm bicortical position screws, and the wire fixation group received inferior border wires and 6 weeks of skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with 24-gauge wires. Cephalometric films were obtained 2 weeks before surgery and at 1 week, 8 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years after surgery. Linear cephalometric changes were referenced to a cranial base coordinate system. Before surgery, both groups were comparable with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. Both groups underwent similar surgical changes. Skeletal and dental movements occurred in both groups throughout the study period. Five years after surgery, the wire group had 2.2 mm (42%) of sagittal skeletal relapse, while the rigid group remained unchanged from immediately postsurgery. Surprisingly, at 5 years, both groups had similar changes in overbite and overjet. This was attributed to dental changes in the maxillary and mandibular incisors. Although rigid fixation is more stable than wire fixation for maintaining the skeletal advancement after a BSSO, the incisor changes made the resultant occlusions of the 2 groups indistinguishable.     

Stability of the mandible after advancement and use of dental plus skeletal maxillomandibular fixation: an experimental investigation in Macaca mulatta

This study examined short-term stability of the mandible following advancement surgery and the use of skeletal suspension wires plus dental maxillomandibular fixation. Twenty-four adult female Macaca mulatta underwent bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy and advancement of approximately 6 mm. All animals had dental maxillomandibular fixation secured by bonding the upper and lower teeth together with an orthodontic composite resin. In half of the animals, the use of circummandibular wires connected to pyriform aperture wires were additionally applied. Tantalum bone markers were placed and cephalograms analyzed during the first six postoperative weeks to evaluate skeletal stability. A statistically significant mean horizontal relapse at the mandibular symphysis occurred in the group without the skeletal wires, whereas no relapse occurred in the group with the skeletal wires. A significant difference in the vertical displacement of the anterior mandible occurred, with an inferior movement of the symphysis in the group without skeletal wires, and a superior movement of the symphysis in the group with skeletal wires. The results of this study indicate that the use of skeletal suspension wires is advantageous in the prevention of horizontal and vertical skeletal relapse.     

Maintenance of soft tissue changes after rigid versus wire fixation for mandibular advancement, with and without genioplasty

OBJECTIVE: This multisite prospective randomized clinical trial examined 2-year longitudinal soft tissue profile changes after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement by using rigid or wire fixation, with and without genioplasty. STUDY DESIGN: The study sample consisted of 127 subjects. The rigid-fixation group (n = 78) received 2-mm bicortical position screws, whereas the wire-fixation group (n = 49) received inferior border wires. In the rigid-fixation group, 35 subjects underwent genioplasty, whereas 24 subjects underwent genioplasty in the wire-fixation group. Soft tissue profile changes of labrale inferius, B-point, and pogonion were obtained from digitized cephalometric films taken immediately before surgery and up to 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: Regardless of fixation technique, subjects who had genioplasty in conjunction with the mandibular advancement had the largest surgical movement and the largest postsurgical change (P <.05). When all variables were constant, fixation technique was associated with maintenance of soft tissue change. Subjects who underwent rigid fixation maintained more soft tissue change than patients who underwent wire fixation. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that subjects undergoing rigid fixation and genioplasty maintained the most soft tissue advancement.     

A comparison of skeletal and dental changesbetween rigid and wire fixation for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy

For two years, this multisite prospective clinical trial examined longitudinalskeletal and dental changes after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement in which either rigid or wire fixation was used. Subjects in the rigid fixation group (n = 78) received 2-mm bicortical position screws, while the subjects in the wire fixation group (n = 49) received inferior border wires. Skeletal and dental changes were measured from cephalometric films taken immediately before surgery, one week after surgery, and at eight weeks, six months, one year, and two years after surgery. In both groups, the overbite and overjet increase with time, but were not different from each other. The B-point in the wire group progressively moved posteriorly, and at two years, it had relapsed 28%. In the rigid fixation group, there was a transient anterior movement of the B-point during the first six months and by two years after surgery, the B-point was unchanged from immediate post surgery. Dental changes occurred in both groups. These changes, however, were not able to accommodate the skeletal changes, resulting in similar increases in both overbite and overjet in both groups of patients. These results have implications for the orthodontists in management of the postmandibular advancement occlusion.     

Stability of the mandible following advancement: a comparison of three postsurgical fixation techniques

This study examines short-term stability of the mandible following mandibular advancement surgery by means of three standard techniques of postsurgical fixation. Twenty-two adult female rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) underwent sagittal ramus advancement osteotomy of approximately 4 to 6 mm. Six animals had dental maxillomandibular fixation alone. Six animals had dental plus skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with circummandibular wires connected to pyriform aperture wires. Ten animals had rigid internal fixation with bicortical bone screws between the proximal and distal segments without maxillomandibular fixation. Radiographic cephalograms with the aid of tantalum bone markers and dental amalgams were analyzed during the first 6 postoperative weeks to evaluate skeletal and dental stability. Rigid internal fixation and the use of dental plus skeletal maxillomandibular fixation were both equally effective in the prevention of postsurgical relapse. However, in the animals in which only dental maxillomandibular fixation was used, statistically significant changes (relapse) occurred when compared with either of the other groups.     

Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: rigid internal fixation versus wire osteosynthesis of the mandible.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate skeletal stability after double-jaw surgery for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion to assess whether there were any differences between wire and rigid fixation of the mandible. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven Class III patients had Le Fort I osteotomy stabilized with plate and screws for maxillary advancement. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback was stabilized with wire osteosynthesis and maxillomandibular fixation for 6 weeks in 20 patients (group 1) and with rigid internal fixation in 17 patients (group 2). Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery, immediately after surgery, 8 weeks after surgery, and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Before surgery, both groups were balanced with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. One year after surgery, maxillary sagittal stability was excellent in both groups, and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy accounted for most of the total horizontal relapse observed. In group 1, significant correlations were found between maxillary advancement and relapse at the posterior maxilla and between mandibular setback and postoperative counterclockwise rotation of the ramus and mandibular relapse. In group 2, significant correlations were found between mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the ramus and between mandibular setback and postoperative counterclockwise rotation of the ramus and mandibular relapse. No significant differences in postoperative skeletal and dental stability between groups were observed except for maxillary posterior vertical position. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical correction of Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures appears to be a fairly stable procedure independent of the type of fixation used to stabilize the mandible.     

Mandibular range of motion after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with wire osteosynthesis or rigid fixation

OBJECTIVES: An analysis was conducted to compare mandibular range of motion among Class II patients treated with wire osteosynthesis or rigid internal fixation after surgical mandibular advancement.Study Design: Patients randomly received wire osteosynthesis and 8 weeks of maxillomandibular fixation (n = 49) or rigid internal fixation (n = 78). Mandibular range of motion was measured 2 weeks before surgery and 8 weeks, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery. RESULTS: Both groups showed decreased mobility in all movement dimensions that progressively recovered to near presurgical levels over the 5-year follow-up period. The difference in range of motion between treatment groups was not statistically significant. Changes in proximal and distal segment position could not explain decreased mobility. CONCLUSIONS: Similar decreases in mandibular mobility occurred with wire and rigid fixation of a bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy after surgery. Long-term changes were statistically, but not clinically, significant.     

Stability of simultaneous maxillary intrusion and mandibular advancement: A comparison of rigid and nonrigid fixation techniques

This study examines the short-term stability of bimaxillary surgery following Le Fort I impaction with simultaneous bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular advancement using two standard techniques of postsurgical fixation. Fifteen adults had skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation, and fifteen adults had rigid internal fixation using bone plates in the maxilla and bicortical bone screws between the proximal and distal segments in the mandible. The group with rigid internal fixation did not undergo maxillomandibular fixation. Radiographic cephalograms were analyzed during the postsurgical period to evaluate skeletal and dental stability. There was no statistical difference in postsurgical stability with rigid internal fixation or skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation other than the vertical position of the maxillary molar; the skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation group had a significant amount of postsurgical intrusion of the maxillary molar when compared with the rigid internal fixation group. Although the other measures showed no statistically significant difference between the experimental groups, the amount of variability in postsurgical stability in the group with skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation was greater than that found in the group with rigid internal fixation.     

Five-year outcome and predictability of soft tissue profiles when wire or rigid fixation is used in mandibular advancement surgery.

The purpose of this study was to follow the covariation of hard and soft tissue changes in Class II malocclusion subjects who received a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. The subjects were randomized to receive wire or rigid fixation after the surgery. Subjects in the rigid group (n = 78) received 2-mm bicortical position screws, and those in the wire group (n = 49) received inferior border wires and 6 weeks of skeletal intermaxillary fixation with 24-gauge wires. Additionally, some subjects received genioplasty in both the rigid (n = 35) and the wire groups (n = 24). Soft and hard tissue profile changes were obtained from cephalometric films immediately before surgery and at various times up to 5 years postsurgery. Soft and hard tissue profile changes were referenced to a cranial-base X-Y coordinate system. Horizontal changes in mandibular incisor, lower lip, B-point, soft tissue B-point, pogonion, and soft tissue pogonion were calculated at each time. There was considerable skeletal relapse in the wire fixation group. Bivariate correlations and ratios between the hard and soft tissue changes were calculated for each time period. Hard to soft tissue correlations were the highest at the earlier times, although the ratios varied among the 4 groups. These results provide a solid basis for both short-term and long-term prediction.     

Relapse following mandibular advancement with dental plus skeletal maxillomandibular fixation

This study examines the short-term stability of the mandible following mandibular advancement surgery in which skeletal suspension wires were used in addition to dental maxillomandibular fixation. Twenty adults underwent sagittal ramus osteotomies. No concomitant surgical procedures were performed. Maxillomandibular fixation consisted of wiring between the upper and lower orthodontic brackets and circummandibular wires connected to the piriform aperture or anterior nasal spine wires for eight weeks. Cephalograms were analyzed during this period to evaluate skeletal stability. A statistically insignificant mean horizontal relapse of 8.9% was found at pogonion during the period of fixation. Significant vertical intrusion of the anterior mandible occurred, however, with a mean superior movement of pogonion of 0.83 mm (P less than or equal to 0.05). Dental changes noted were uprighting of the maxillary incisors and flaring of the mandibular incisors. In comparison with the results of other studies in which dental maxillomandibular fixation was used alone, the results of this study indicate that the use of skeletal suspension wires is advantageous in the prevention of horizontal skeletal relapse.     

Stability of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: rigid fixation versus transosseous wiring.

Although many improvements have been made in orthodontic surgical procedures for mandibular retrognathism, relapse continues to occur. This study was designed to compare the stability of rigid and nonrigid fixation between 2 groups of patients who had undergone mandibular advancement surgery via sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Retrospective cephalometric measurements were made on 54 randomly selected orthognathic surgical patients. The patients, 7 males and 47 females, were divided into 2 groups: 28 patients stabilized by means of rigid fixation and 26 patients fixated with interosseous wires. The age of the patients ranged from 15.3 to 49.7 years. Lateral cephalograms were used to evaluate each patient at 3 distinct intervals: 7.0 +/- 2.0 days before surgery (T1), 34.4 +/- 15.0 days postsurgery (T2), and 458 +/- 202 days after sagittal split osteotomy (T3). Eighteen linear and angular measurements were recorded and differences between the 3 time periods were evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the differences in the 2 fixation types between and within each group at different time intervals. The following measurements showed statistically significant skeletal relapse over time, for the P value.0028: Co-Go, ANS-Xi-Pm, IMPA, overbite, and overjet. The remaining variables showed no statistically significant relapse. The only measurement that showed a statistically significant group difference between T1 and T2 was DC-Xi-Pm. Results of the study led to the following conclusions: there was statistically significant relapse in mandibular length, lower anterior face height, mandibular arc, lower incisor inclination, overbite, and overjet in each group, regardless of the type of fixation. The potential was greater for relapse in patients stabilized with transosseous wiring. Although multifactorial, relapse in overbite and overjet may be a combination of skeletal and dental changes. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:397-403).     

Mobility of the mandible following advancement and maxillomandibular or rigid internal fixation: an experimental investigation in Macaca mulatta

This study examined the postsurgical range of mandibular motion following sagittal advancement osteotomy in Macaca mulatta when either maxillomandibular or rigid osseous fixation were used. Seventeen adult female Macaca mulatta underwent sagittal advancement osteotomy of approximately 4 to 6 mm. Six had 6 weeks of maxillomandibular fixation and eleven had rigid osseous fixation with no maxillomandibular fixation. Mandibular range of motion was measured by the change in the angle of the posterior aspect of the mandibular ramus from a closed-mouth and an open-mouth cephalogram. Parametric tests were used to statistically analyze the results. The results of this investigation showed that the animals who did not undergo maxillomandibular fixation maintained a greater range of motion in the early postsurgical period and obtained preoperative mobility by 12 weeks postsurgery. The animals who underwent six weeks of maxillomandibular fixation showed statistically significant decreases in range of motion when compared to the rigid fixation group at each period of time postsurgery, with significant reductions from preoperative values at 12 weeks postsurgery.     

Stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. I. Mandibular setback

Postsurgical stability of mandibular setback to correct mandibular prognathism was compared for three approaches: transoral vertical ramus osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with wire osteosynthesis and maxillomandibular fixation, and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with rigid internal fixation via bone screws. In the transoral vertical ramus osteotomy group, the mean postsurgical change in chin position was almost zero, but nearly 50% of the patients did have clinically significant changes in chin position; two thirds of these movements were posterior and one third anterior. In the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy groups, the chin either stayed in its immediately postsurgical position or moved anteriorly. In one fourth of the patients who received maxillomandibular fixation and in nearly half of the patients who received rigid internal fixation, the chin moved forward more than 4 mm.     

Stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior internal fixation alone: a case series.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the late postsurgical stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior internal fixation alone and no posterior zygomaticomaxillary buttress internal fixation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with maxillary vertical hyperplasia and mandibular retrognathia underwent a 1-piece Le Fort I osteotomy of the maxilla with superior repositioning and advancement or setback. A bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement was also performed in 22 patients. Stabilization of each maxillary osteotomy was achieved using transosseous stainless steel wires and/or 3-hole titanium miniplates in the piriform aperture region bilaterally, with no zygomaticomaxillary buttress internal fixation. (Twelve of the 60 identified patients were available for a late postoperative radiographic evaluation.) Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken preoperatively (T1), early postoperatively (T2), and late postoperatively (T3) to analyze skeletal movement. RESULTS: These 12 patients (5 male, 7 female) had a mean age of 24.5 years at surgery. Mean time from surgery to T2 was 41.2 days; mean time from surgery to T3 was 14.8 months. One patient received anterior wire osteosynthesis fixation, while 11 patients received both anterior titanium miniplate internal skeletal fixation and anterior wire osteosynthesis fixation. Six patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy with genioplasty, 1 patient underwent Le Fort I osteotomy with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy, and 5 patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy and genioplasty. These 12 patients all underwent maxillary superior repositioning with either advancement (11 patients) or setback (1 patient). Statistically significant surgical (T2-T1) changes were found in all variables measured. In late postsurgical measurements (T3-T2), all landmarks in the horizontal and vertical plane showed statistically significant skeletal stability. CONCLUSION: This case series suggests that anterior internal fixation alone in cases of 1-piece Le Fort I maxillary superior repositioning with advancement has good late postoperative skeletal stability.     

Superior repositioning of the maxilla combined with mandibular advancement: mandibular RIF improves stability.

Postsurgical changes in 24 patients who had rigid internal fixation (RIF) of the mandible with screws after combined superior repositioning of the maxilla and mandibular advancement were compared with 53 patients who underwent the same surgery but who had intraosseous wire fixation, skeletal suspension wires, and 8 weeks of maxillomandibular fixation (MMF). During the first 8 weeks after surgery, the mean posterior relapse of the mandible was greater in the MMF group than in the RIF group (for example, -1.1 mm versus 0.15 mm at B point), and the percentage of patients with clinically significant vertical and horizontal changes was greater in the MMF group. By 1 year, there had been slight additional mean relapse in the MMF group (-1.5 mm net relapse at B point, with 42% of the patients showing 2 mm or more relapse). In the RIF group, the mandible was more likely to be repositioned forward than posteriorly (net mean change at B point, 0.7 mm forward; 33% had 2 mm or more forward movement). In the RIF group, all but one of the patients (96%) were judged to have an excellent clinical result; in the MMF group, the corresponding figure was 60%.     

Mandibular range of motion with rigid/nonrigid fixation

Decreased mandibular range of motion that followed orthognathic surgery and that was treated by wire osteosynthesis and 6 weeks of maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) has been previously documented. The present study evaluated maximum interincisal opening (MIO) in 49 subjects undergoing a bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy (BSRO) with advancement or a BSRO with advancement and a concomitant LeFort I maxillary osteotomy with the patients having either rigid or nonrigid fixation. The group with rigid fixation had early function and mild physiotherapy. The nonrigid group had wire osteosynthesis, MMF that was maintained for 6 weeks, and no postoperative physiotherapy. Patients who underwent a BSRO with rigid fixation experienced a 3.5 mm decrease in MIO (6.9%). Those who had a BSRO and a LeFort I osteotomy with rigid fixation had a 3.3 mm decrease in MIO (6.6%). In contrast, nonrigidly fixed BSRO subjects had a 16.8 mm decrease (29.6%), while those who underwent a combined BSRO and LeFort I osteotomy had a 13.9 mm decrease (26.1%). This study showed that rigid fixation combined with early function and mild physiotherapy resulted in improved MIO postoperatively, as compared to the MIO in a group in which these treatments were not used.     

Comparison of relapse in bilateral sagittal split osteotomies for mandibular advancement: rigid internal fixation (screws) versus inferior border wiring with anterior skeletal fixation

A retrospective study of 28 patients treated by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomies for mandibular advancement and stabilized by two different methods of fixation was performed. Fourteen patients received rigid fixation, and 14 patients had inferior border wiring with anterior skeletal fixation. The postoperative and long-term cephalograms (greater than 6 months) were analyzed in a horizontal and vertical direction for relapse. In the horizontal direction, the rigid group experienced a 1.5% relapse in point B and a 3.2% relapse in pogonion. In the vertical direction, the rigid group experienced a 4% relapse in point B and a 9% relapse in pogonion, while the wire osteosynthesis group had a 13% relapse in point B and a 6% relapse in pogonion. These results support the belief that rigid fixation is more stable than is wire osteosynthesis and that it helps prevent relapse in the long-term results.     

Stability following combined maxillary and mandibular osteotomies treated with rigid internal fixation

Skeletal stability was examined in 16 patients following combined maxillary and mandibular osteotomies using rigid internal fixation. Postoperative changes (T2 to T3) were generally less than 1.0 mm for linear measurements and less than 2.0 degrees for angular measurements. The removal of maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) splints accounted for 85% to 95% of the counterclockwise rotation in the proximal and distal mandibular segments from T2 to T3. Maxillary inferior repositioning and large mandibular advancements exhibited the greatest tendency for relapse; however, the changes were less than with comparable procedures using nonrigid methods for stabilization. Except for large mandibular advancements, relapse was essentially unrelated to the magnitude of the surgical repositioning. Although the use of skeletal, maxillomandibular, and transosseous wire fixation have traditionally provided satisfactory clinical results, the use of rigid internal fixation in combined osteotomy procedures provides better stabilization of dentosseous segments when compared with these nonrigid methods, and may be particularly indicated in complex surgical procedures.     

Mandibular advancement surgery in high-angle and low-angle class II patients: different long-term skeletal responses.

The objective of this cephalometric study was to compare skeletal stability and the time course of postoperative changes in high-angle and low-angle Class II patients after mandibular advancement surgery. The subjects were 61 consecutive mandibular retrognathism patients whose treatment included bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and rigid fixation. The patients were divided according to the preoperative mandibular plane angle; the 20 patients with the lowest mandibular plane angle (20.8 degrees +/- 4.9 degrees ) constituted the low-angle group, while the 20 cases with the highest mandibular plane angle (43.0 degrees +/- 4.0 degrees ) represented the high-angle group. Lateral cephalograms were taken on 6 occasions: immediately before surgery, immediately after surgery, 2 and 6 months after surgery, and 1 and 3 years after surgery. Results demonstrated that the high-angle and low-angle groups had different patterns of surgical and postoperative changes. High-angle patients were associated with both a higher frequency and a greater magnitude of horizontal relapse. While 95% of the total relapse took place during the first 2 months after surgery in the low-angle group, high-angle patients demonstrated a more continuous relapse pattern, with a significant proportion (38%) occurring late in the follow-up period. Possible reasons for the different postsurgical response are discussed.