Root surface debridement and endotoxin removal

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed associations between the number of standardized scaling strokes and the reduction of endotoxin on the root surface. BACKGROUND: Therapy of periodontally involved teeth attempts removal of accretions by scaling and root planing. The amount of mechanical therapy required to free the root surface from etiologic factors remains unknown. METHODS: Twenty-four extracted human caries-free single rooted teeth with at least 5 mm attachment loss were used. A region of interest (ROI) which contained subgingival calculus was defined on the root surface of each tooth. Standardized force instrumentation was applied using a force-measuring curet. Fifty working strokes were applied to every ROI. Forces applied were recorded. The force recordings were converted from Millivolts into Newtons (N). After every unit of 5 strokes, presence of calculus was evaluated and scaling debris was collected. Endotoxin concentration was determined in the debris samples. RESULTS: The endotoxin values for strokes 1-5 were statistically significantly greater than the values from all other stroke intervals. Complete calculus removal occurred after a mean of 9.3 strokes. The endotoxin concentration reached a minimal level with concentrations of 0.03-0.306 EU/ml after calculus removal was complete. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that completion of calculus removal coincides with endotoxin levels associated with clinically healthy teeth.     

Root substance removal by scaling and root planing.

The amount of root substance removed by scaling and root planing is largely unknown. The present study evaluated in vitro the root substance loss caused by a defined number of working strokes at known forces. Forty extracted teeth with loss of connective tissue attachment into the middle third of the roots were washed and embedded in plaster, leaving one entire corono-apical tooth aspect exposed. The teeth were reproducibly repositioned in a bench-vise, where a profilometer repeatedly measured root surface levels at the same location. In a standard area of the roots a total of 40 working strokes were applied. Low forces were used in 30 teeth and high forces in 10 teeth. The forces were recorded using a piezo-electric receiver built into the upper shank of the curet. Root substance loss was measured after 5, 10, 20, and 40 working strokes. The results showed that the mean low force used per working stroke across all 40 strokes was 3.04 Newtons for the low forces, and 8.48 Newtons for the high forces. Mean cumulative loss of root substance across 40 strokes was 148.7 microns at low forces, and 343.3 microns at high forces. The mean force per stroke increased slightly across the 40 strokes, while substance removal per stroke decreased. Substance removal per stroke during strokes 1 to 5 was 6.8 microns using low forces and 20.6 microns using high forces. During strokes 21 to 40 mean removal per stroke was 2.3 microns at low forces, and 5.6 microns at high forces. These results suggest that high forces remove more root substance, and loss per stroke becomes less with increasing numbers of strokes.     

Subgingival debridement with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments and assessment of substance removal on extracted teeth.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that endotoxins are located on the periodontally diseased root cementum and not within it. To what extent a Teflon-tubed sonic scaler was capable of removing bacterial deposits in comparison to conventional scaling instruments, and the resulting root surface roughness and root surface topography, were recently assessed. The objective of the present study was to evaluate how much root cementum is removed with these instruments. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty-two teeth were treated subgingivally on one approximal site either with a Teflon-coated sonic scaler insert (tSS), a Gracey curette, a conventional sonic scaler (SS), a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler insert (US), or an oscillating Periotor insert (PT) before extraction. The untreated site served as control. The width and length of cementum removal were compared histomorphometrically. Nonparametric analyses were carried out for statistical comparison. RESULTS: The US, PT, and tSS inserts removed less substance than the curettes or SS inserts. The cementum removed was 40 microm for root surfaces treated with the curette or SS, 30 microm for those treated with US, 20 microm for PT, and 17 microm for tSS. CONCLUSION: The Teflon-coated sonic scaler inserts can be a reasonable choice for gentle maintenance treatment of compliant patients with good plaque control, and little or no subgingival deposits.     

Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth

AIM: To assess the root surface roughness and topography on extracted teeth using different instruments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the present study, laser profilometry was used to examine the 3-D roughness values Ra and Rz and topography of root surfaces of periodontally-involved teeth instrumented in vivo with curette, conventional ultrasonic device, conventional or teflon-coated sonic scaler insert, or the Periotor instrument (12 teeth per instrument type), and compare these with uninstrumented cementum surfaces. RESULTS: The roughness values Ra and Rz of the roots treated with the different instruments showed a similar pattern: curettes and the Periotor instrument produced the smoothest surfaces (Ra about 1.5 microm, Rz 30 microm); the 4 other instruments created similar Ra values of approximately 2-3 microm and Rz roughness of about 50-70 microm, which equals the untreated root surface. For Ra, the difference between the curette or the Periotor instrument and the teflon-coated sonic insert or ultrasonic insert was significant, and for Rz, a significant difference was found between the curette or the Periotor instrument and ultrasonic insert. As opposed to surfaces debrided with the Periotor and teflon-coated sonic scaler, it appears that hand instruments markedly reconfigure surfaces. CONCLUSION: The lowest root-surface roughness values were obtained with hand instruments. The teflon tubing on the sonic scaler insert effected no change of topography or roughness as compared to uninstrumented, control surfaces. However, it must be pointed out that hard-tissue removal was not investigated.     

Study of the influence of different instruments for removing dental deposits on tooth surface

There are many contradiction literature data about different scaling and root planing instrument influence on hared dental tissues. We have tested dental enamel and cement surfaces after application of sonic, ultrasonic and hand instruments by scanning electron microscopy. The cement surface is damaged more, than a surface of enamel after scaling and root planing. The maximum damages have been produced by ultrasonic scaler surface and minimum - on hand scaler surface of the tooth. Ultrasonic scaler has removed root cement and bared dentinal tubules. Residual calculi have been found after sonic, ultrasonic, hand scaling. Scaling and root planing instrument influence on tooth enamel and cement needs further studies.     

Root debridement of single-rooted teeth with a diamond-coated sonic scaler insert during flap surgery. A pilot study

In our laboratory, we modified inserts of a sonic scaler to increase effectivity of root surface instrumentation during flap surgery. The present clinical study investigates whether use of this diamond-coated, thickened insert facilitates more rapid root debridement compared to hand instruments and whether clinical wound healing is influenced by the type of instrument used. In 13 patients with moderate to advanced periodontal destructions, flap surgery was carried out on single rooted teeth with probing depth of > or =6 mm. The mean amount of time saved by root debridement with the diamond-coated insert was 60% over curets. Regardless of the used instrumentation method probing depths and attachment level changes were altered and remained unchanged for 2 years after surgery. In conclusion the newly-developed, diamond-coated sonic scaler insert facilitates more rapid root debridement during flap surgery than hand instruments without disadvantageously affecting clinical healing.     

A quantitative study of cementum removal with hand curettes

An in vitro study was conducted to quantitatively measure the depth of root surface removal using curettes of standardized sharpness and with definite stroke number. Extracted periodontally healthy teeth from patients 10 to 15, 16 to 25, and 26 to 40 years old had periodontal ligament remnants removed with dry gauze before being secured in a vertical position during root planing. The force applied to the root surface was measured with a tension load cell. The "bright line" test was used to assess curette sharpness. After histologic processing, the thickness of cementum adjacent to the root defect, the cementum (if any) in the root defect, total amount of cementum removed, and depth of root defect were measured by a microscopic ocular grid. Teeth from each age range were evenly distributed into 6 groups of 10 teeth each. In the majority of teeth from the 20 stroke group through the 70 stroke group, complete cementum removal was observed at the site of planing. However, in some sections from each group, fragments of cementum remained on the root surface. A positive relationship (r/s = 1) was found between the number of strokes and the force applied to the root surface and the mean depth of defect (P less than 0.05). However, an inverse relationship existed between mean force per stroke and mean defect depth (r/s = -.99) such that as mean force per stroke increased, the mean defect depth decreased. As the root surface became smoother with an increasing number of strokes, the forces increased and were more consistent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparative study on the effect of ultrasonic instruments on the root surface in vivo

The present study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of different ultrasonic instruments on the root surface. Fourteen patients with 35 single root teeth designated for extraction were recruited to the present study. Teeth were assigned to four experimental groups: group 1, piezoelectric ultrasonic device; group 2, magnetostrictive ultrasonic device; group 3, hand instrumentation; and group 4, untreated teeth (control). After instrumentation, the teeth were extracted and the presence of residual deposits (roughness and root surfaces characteristics) were analyzed. The results showed that residual deposits were similar in all tested groups: piezoelectric, 8.7%; magnetostrictive, 9.7%; hand instrumentation, 11.1% and control, 76.4%. There were statistically significant differences between control and all the experimental groups (p < 0.0001). With respect to roughness parameters evaluation, R_a and R_z of the roots treated with the different instruments showed a similar pattern (p > 0.05), but for R_t and R_y, a significant difference was observed (p < 0.05) among hand instrumentation and ultrasonic devices. SEM analysis revealed a similar root surface pattern for the ultrasonic devices, but curettes showed many instrumental scratches, deep gouges, and a relatively large amount of dentin was removed. Within the limits of the study, although the instruments produced similar results, root surfaces instrumentated with curettes were rougher and had more root surface tissue removed than with the ultrasonic device.     

New attachment in monkeys with experimental periodontitis with and without removal of the cementum

Experimental periodontitis was induced in monkeys by means of elastic orthodontic ligatures. The periodontally-involved teeth were then treated with different methods. At the end of the treatment period, the monkeys were sacrificed. The premolar-molar areas were dissected out and embedded in a low-viscosity embedding medium (Spurr). The results of the treatment procedures were analyzed on ground sections. Formation of new cementum and new bone was determined by means of tetracycline labeling. Root planing with an ultrasonic device or with hand instruments almost completely removed the cementum and a portion of the peripheral dentin. The root surface was more uneven after treatment with the ultrasonic device than after using hand instruments. No new attachment could be found after root planing. Cleaning of the periodontally-involved root surfaces with two detergents (cetylpyrimidinium chloride and sodium-N-lauroyl sarcosine) without root planing resulted in a significant amount of new attachment.     

Root surface debridement – an in vitro assessment

Root planing has been advocated to render periodontally involved root surfaces 'biologically compatible' with the surrounding soft tissues and thus promote healing. However, recent work has shown that only small amounts of cytotoxic material are likely to be incorporated within the root surfaces, thereby questioning the rationale for the traditional emphasis that is placed upon the removal of 'diseased cementum'. This investigation assessed by limulus amoebocyte lysate (LAL) assay and Polymyxin B affinity chromatography the extent of residual lipopolysaccharide (LPS) following root surface instrumentation in vitro. A conservative regime was carried out, consisting of 15 instrument strokes per surface designed to ensure complete overlapping of the strokes. This harvested varying amounts of LPS from 18 single-rooted teeth while leaving behind less than 0.24 ng of LPS per tooth in the majority (72%) of cases. This finding endorses the growing belief that extensive root planing may not be warranted.     

An in vitro investigation on the loss of root substance in scaling with various instruments

There are differing opinions as to the extent to which root cementum has to be removed during root surface instrumentation over and above that of the debridement of plaque and calculus. Similarly, the amount of tooth material removed by individual instruments is also unclear, but a trend towards less damaging methods of root surface debridement has evolved in recent years. The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the amounts of root substance removed by 4 different methods of instrumentation, hand curette, ultrasonic scaler, airscaler and fine grit diamond bur. Measurement of tooth substance loss was carried out with a specially constructed measuring device at 360 sites on 90 mandibular incisors following 12 working strokes with a clinically appropriate force of application. Only a thin layer of root substance (11.6 microns) was removed by the ultrasonic scaler, compared to the much greater losses sustained with the airscaler (93.5 microns), the curette (108.9 microns) and the diamond bur (118.7 microns).     

A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study compared the effectiveness of two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler for subgingival scaling and root planing in vivo. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with advanced periodontal disease and with teeth scheduled for extraction were selected for this study. Three experimental groups of 10 teeth each were treated with one of two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers [Vector scaler and Enac scaler] or with a hand scaler. Instrumentation was continued until the root surface felt hard and smooth to an explorer tip. The root surface characteristics after instrumentation were examined using scanning electron microscopy, and the amount of remaining calculus, roughness and loss of tooth substance were estimated using the remaining calculus index and roughness loss of tooth substance index. RESULTS: The remaining calculus index did not differ significantly among the three groups. The roughness loss of tooth substance index was significantly lower for the Vector scaler and Enac scaler groups than for the hand scaler group and also differed significantly between the Vector scaler and Enac scaler groups. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the Vector scaler produces a smooth root surface with minimal loss of tooth substance. It is a reasonable choice for gentle periodontal maintenance treatment.     

Comparative effectiveness of hand and ultrasonic instrumentations in root surface planing in vitro

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A variety of techniques are employed for planing and scaling of the superficial root surfaces, of which hand and ultrasonic instrumentations have been preferentially used in routine periodontics clinics. This study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of ultrasonic scalers and hand curettes in facilitating fibroblast attachment to the scaled root surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with periodontally involved teeth and nine subjects without periodontal diseases (control subjects) were selected. Two single-rooted teeth were extracted from each subject. Mesial and distal surfaces of teeth were selected in treated and untreated groups, respectively. The mesial surface of each tooth was randomly chosen to be treated either by hand curettes or ultrasonic instrumentation. The degree of cell attachment on the root surfaces of treated and untreated groups from control subjects and patients was then determined by the use of a gingival fibroblast line established and employed at early passages. The attachment and proliferation of gingival fibroblasts on the root surfaces were evaluated using neutral red assay and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: Fibroblast survival and proliferation on the surfaces of untreated periodontally involved roots were found to be significantly lower compared with control untreated surfaces (p<0.0001) or treated surfaces from patients (p<0.0001). No significant difference, however, was observed between root surfaces treated either by hand curettes or ultrasonic scalers. CONCLUSION: These results indicate the beneficial effectiveness of both techniques in root treatment and planing.     

牙周内窥镜辅助治疗对牙根表面影响的初步研究

目的:评价牙周内窥镜辅助超声龈下刮治及根面平整术(SRP)对比传统SRP后根面形态的改变和粗糙度的影响.方法:纳入12颗因牙周炎拔除的患牙,分为3组(n =4):(1)内窥镜辅助超声SRP;(2)传统SRP,超声刮治后用Gracey刮治器根面平整;(3)不做处理.另取4颗健康牙作对照.处理后用扫描电镜观察牙根表面微观结...     

An in vitro study of oscillating instruments for root planing

Abstract The objective of this in vitro study was to test PER-IO-TOR instruments on the Profin Directional System angle piece (Dentatus - Sweden), using extracted human teeth. In the 1st part of the study, 6 root surfaces were treated with the instruments TOR 1, TOR 2, TOR 3 and TOR 4. For comparison purposes, half the samples treated with each instrument were then subjected to further treatment with a Gracey curette. All samples were then examined by SEM. In the 2nd part of the study, 4 root surfaces were given standardized treatment with each PER-IO-TOR instrument and the amount of substance removed was determined with a mechanical profilometer. For this purpose, the treated root surface was scanned with a microneedle and the profile depth recorded. The study showed that the PER-IO-TOR instruments were efficient with respect to surface planing and protective abrasion. Instrument TOR 3 (spatula with eyelet) in particular yielded simular results to those obtained with a curette. The overall results confirm that the PER-IO-TOR instruments have similar planing properties to manual instruments, causing minimum abrasion from the root surface. They thus represent an alternative to manual instruments, not only in inaccessible areas but also on smooth tooth surfaces.     

The effect of citric acid application on periodontally involved root surfaces. 1. An in vitro light microscopic study.

This study investigated the effect of citric acid application on periodontally involved root surfaces. Forty periodontally involved teeth were randomly divided into four groups of ten teeth each: no treatment, citric acid treatment, root planing alone, and root planing in conjunction with citric acid treatment. Ten nondiseased, untreated teeth served as controls. After treatment, each tooth was split along its long axis; half was examined under light microscopy and half under scanning electron microscopy (part II of the paper). Light microscopy revealed that the effects obtained by scaling and root planing were not altered after citric acid application. Moreover, the cementum layer was not entirely removed without careful and thorough planing of the root surface. Citric acid application alone had no effect on the diseased root surface. Citric acid did not penetrate the dentinal tubules, nor did it alter the collagen content of the roots obtained by scaling and root planing.     

A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument

BACKGROUND: The effects of magnetostrictive ultrasonic instruments and piezoelectric ultrasonic instruments on tooth surfaces seem to differ with regards to root debridement. AIM: The purpose of this study was to compare a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaling instrument with a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument and a hand curette regarding time taken, calculus removal, tooth surface roughness (Ra), and SEM examination before and after instrumentation. METHODS: 30 extracted human teeth with subgingival calculus were assigned to one of three treatment groups (n=10). The working force was standardised for both ultrasonic instruments at 200 g and for the curette at 500 g. RESULTS: The results revealed that the time needed for instrumentation was 126.1+/-38.2 s for the curette, significantly more than for the piezoelectric ultrasonic instrument (74.1+/-27.6 s; p<0.05) and 104.9+/-25.4 s for the magnetostrictive ultrasonic instrument. Remaining calculus was similar for all three groups. The end Ra values were significantly worse for the piezoelectric instrument (2.02+/-0.41; p<0.05) compared to 1.42+/-0.48 for the curette and 1.36+/-0.41 for the magnetostrictive instrument. The SEM examination revealed the smoothest surfaces but, subjectively, the most tooth substance loss after the curette, followed by the magnetostrictive instrument, with the least substance loss, and then the piezoelectric instrument, with medium substance loss. CONCLUSION: The piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler was more efficient than the magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler in removing calculus but left the instrumented tooth surface rougher.     

Comparative in vitro studies of sonic, ultrasonic and reciprocating scaling instruments

Flat root surface areas of formalin-stored mandibular incisors with plaque and calculus were scaled by sonic (PHATELUS SONIC SCALER, SONIC FLEX 2000, TITAN-S SONIC SCALER) or ultrasonic instruments (HYGIENIST ULTRASONIC SCALER, CAVITRON) or by a new reciprocating scaling insert for the EVA/PROFIN system. The test areas were photographed by SEM and coded micrographs were independently graded by three examiners using the RCI (Remaining Calculus Index) and the RLTSI (Roughness Loss of Tooth Substance Index). The findings revealed that the sonic scalers as a group removed calculus more completely but also left significantly more roughness and loss of tooth substance than the other instruments tested. No difference was seen between the two ultrasonic scalers. The reciprocating insert gave results similar to those of the ultrasonic except for the scaling time which was significantly longer for the new "cleansing principle".     

Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study

Solís Moreno C, Santos A, Nart J, Levi P, Velásquez A, Sanz Moliner J. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study. J Periodont Res 2012; 47: 608–615. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S Background and Objective: The ideal instrument for initial periodontal therapy should enable the removal of all extraneous substances from the root surfaces without any iatrogenic effects. Because of that the objective of this study is to analyse and to compare the root surface roughness after using Gracey curettes, termination diamond burs (40 μm), a piezo‐ceramic ultrasonic scaler and a piezosurgery ultrasonic scaler using confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Material and Methods: A 2 mm × 2 mm interproximal root area of 20 teeth (n = 40 surfaces) was evaluated by confocal microscopy (×20 magnification) and scanning electron microscopy (×50 to ×1000 magnification). Teeth were randomly assigned to the following four groups: Gracey curettes with 15 vertical strokes; termination diamond burs (40 μm) at 3000 r.p.m.; a piezo‐ceramic ultrasonic scaler with a power of 11; and a piezosurgery ultrasonic scaler in mode ROOT with a power of two. Results: Confocal microscopy revealed that curettes [mean changes in the value of surface roughness average reduced by 0.11 ± 0.3], piezo‐ceramic ultrasonic scaler (roughness average reduced by 0.47 ± 0.93) and piezosurgery ultrasonic scaler (roughness average reduced by 0.62 ± 0.93) left a smoother surface than termination diamond burs (roughness average increased by 0.39 ± 0.18). Statistically significant differences were observed in roughness (p = 0.005) between piezosurgery and termination diamond burs (p = 0.005). No statistically significant differences were between piezosurgery and Gracey curettes (p = 0.140) and between piezosurgery and piezo‐ceramic ultrasonic scalers (p = 0.745). Confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy showed that piezosurgery seems to leave the smoothest surface. Surfaces treated with termination burs appear to show more scratches and pits. Conclusion: Three of the four instruments tested for root planing reduced surface roughness; however, the piezosurgery ultrasonic scaler produced the smoothest surface. The termination diamond burs (40 μm) produced a rougher surface than the ultrasonic instruments and the hand curettes. Further clinical studies are needed.     

Loss of tooth substance during root planing with various periodontal instruments: an in vitro study

Ultrasonic and power-driven instrumentation is gaining in significance as an acceptable alternative to manual periodontal root treatment. Some question whether they do not remove too much tooth substance. Various ultrasonic scalers, hand instruments and two power-driven systems were compared by assessing the loss of tooth substance due to root instrumentation. Quantitative analysis of this effect of the instruments used was performed on 20 freshly extracted, non-periodontally involved, large human molars. In the first study, 40 specimens were randomly assigned to four groups of treatment: combined use of ultrasonic scaler and Periopolisher diamond-coated inserts (US–POL), hand instruments (MANUAL), Perioplaner–Periopolisher system (PPL–POL) and Periokit ultrasonic-designed scalers (PERIOKIT). The second study involved two treatment groups, ultrasonic scaler alone and hand instruments, each allocated with 20 teeth (small root fragments). An unpaired two-tailed t test was carried out for both studies to compare the average weight loss of root substance with the modes of instrumentation. The level of significance was set at p0.05. The overall results of the first and second experimental trials did not reveal obvious differences in weight loss between the manual, ultrasonic or power-driven root treatments. Based on the results of these two comparative studies, the power-driven inserts or the various ultrasonic scalers tested did not remove more tooth substance than conventional hand instruments. They may thus be a useful alternative for the debridement of root surfaces.