Scintigraphic defecography: Quantitative and dynamic assessment of anorectal function

PURPOSE: Conventional assessment of anorectal function with defecating videoproctography is semiquantitative and the high radiation exposure precludes prolonged or repeated testing. The aim of this study was to develop a dynamic scintigraphic method of assessing anorectal function. METHODS: Fourteen patients with fecal incontinence, 18 patients with chronic constipation, and 8 control subjects were assessed by scintigraphic defecography. This involves introduction of a technetium-99mradiolabeled artificial stool into the rectum of the subject and acquisition of gamma camera images during evacuation. RESULTS: Mean evacuation rate was 2.8 percent/ second in incontinent patients and 0.9 percent/second in constipated patients (P <0.001). The mean anorectal angles were 136° and 133°, respectively. There were 18 cases of pelvic floor descent and 6 rectoceles. Scintigraphic defecography provides quantitative information on rectal evacuation. Anorectal angle and pelvic floor movement can be examined. The radiation dose to pelvic organs is significantly less than with videoproctography. CONCLUSION: We believe that scintigraphic defecography is the investigation of choice for objective and dynamic assessment of anorectal function.Read in part at the meeting of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, Dublin, Ireland, September 1992.     

Phenotypic variation in functional disorders of defecation

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although obstructed defecation is generally attributed to pelvic floor dyssynergia, clinical observations suggest a wider spectrum of anorectal disturbances. Our aim was to characterize phenotypic variability in constipated patients by anorectal assessments. METHODS: Anal pressures, rectal balloon expulsion, rectal sensation, and pelvic floor structure (by endoanal magnetic resonance imaging) and motion (by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging) were assessed in 52 constipated women and 41 age-matched asymptomatic women. Phenotypes were characterized in patients by principal components analysis of these measurements. RESULTS: Among patients, 16 had a hypertensive anal sphincter, 41 had an abnormal rectal balloon expulsion test, and 20 had abnormal rectal sensation. Forty-nine patients (94%) had abnormal pelvic floor motion during evacuation and/or squeeze. After correcting for age and body mass index, 3 principal components explained 71% of variance between patients. These factors were weighted most strongly by perineal descent during evacuation (factor 1), anorectal location at rest (factor 2), and anal resting pressure (factor 3). Factors 1 and 3 discriminated between controls and patients. Compared with patients with normal (n = 23) or reduced (n = 18) perineal descent, patients with increased (n = 11) descent were more likely (P < or = .01) to be obese, have an anal resting pressure >90 mm Hg, and have a normal rectal balloon expulsion test result. CONCLUSIONS: These observations demonstrate that functional defecation disorders comprise a heterogeneous entity that can be subcharacterized by perineal descent during defecation, perineal location at rest, and anal resting pressure. Further studies are needed to ascertain if the phenotypes reflect differences in the natural history of these disorders.     

Dynamic Transperineal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Pelvic Floor Disorders

PURPOSE: Defecating proctography and more recently, magnetic resonance imaging have both been used for diagnosis in patients with pelvic floor dysfunction. This pilot study assessed the feasibility of dynamic transperineal ultrasound in a range of specific disorders affecting evacuation. METHODS: A protocol of sagittal and transverse transperineal imaging was established defining the infralevator viscera and soft tissues and the margins of the puborectalis muscle. Dynamic measurements were possible for the extent of puborectalis shortening, the anorectal angle, and the movement during straining of the anorectal junction. Calculations were made of the depth of demonstrated rectoceles, the posterior urethrovesical angle, and the movement of the urethrovesical junction. Diagnoses were confirmed by proctography (where appropriate) and clinical examination. RESULTS: Transverse images of the anal sphincter were comparable with those obtained using endoanal ultrasonography. Sagittal images permitted the measurement of puborectalis contraction and the anorectal angle comparable with those obtained during defecography. Cystoceles were able to be diagnosed during closure of the posterior urethrovesical angle and abnormal urethrovesical junction descent during straining. Rectoceles, peritoneoceles, enteroceles, and rectoanal intussusception were readily identified using dynamic transperineal ultrasonography. CONCLUSION: Dynamic transperineal ultrasound is a simple, noninvasive way to assess dynamically the interaction of the pelvic viscera and their relationship to the pelvic floor musculature in patients with evacuatory disorders and pelvic floor dysfunction.     

Prognostic significance of rectocele, intussusception, and abnormal perineal descent in biofeedback treatment for constipated patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction

PURPOSE: The findings of paradoxical puborectalis contraction, rectocele, sigmoidocele, intussusception, and abnormal perineal descent often coexist in constipated patients, as noted by defecographic study. Moreover, some of these conditions are often found in asymptomatic patients. Biofeedback is the treatment of choice for constipated patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction; the main determinant of successful biofeedback is patient compliance. The significance of coexistent and highly prevalent variants, such as rectocele, intussusception, sigmoidocele, or abnormal perineal descent, on the success of biofeedback is unknown. This review was designed to assess whether these coexisting defecographic findings have any prognostic significance for the outcome of biofeedback. METHODS: From July 1988 to December 1996, 209 constipated patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction underwent biofeedback treatment after defecography. A total of 173 patients (120 females) who had more than one biofeedback session after defecography formed the study group. Defecographic findings included concomitant rectoceles, 40 (23 percent); evidence of circumferential intussusception, 17 (10 percent); sigmoidocele, 13 (8 percent); and abnormal perineal descent, 109 (63 percent). RESULTS: Whereas 65 patients failed to complete the course of biofeedback therapy, 108 (62.4 percent) patients completed the course of biofeedback and were discharged by the therapist. Within the completed group 59 (55 percent) improved, and 49 (45 percent) patients failed biofeedback therapy. In the improved group 14 (23.7 percent) had a rectocele, 5 (8.5 percent) had intussusception, 5 (8.5 percent) had a sigmoidocele, and 37 (62.7 percent) had abnormal perineal descent. In the failure group 9 (18.4 percent) had a rectocele, 5 (10.2 percent) had an intussusception, 2 (4.1 percent) had a sigmoidocele, and 31 (63.3 percent) had abnormal perineal descent (P = not significant). The success of biofeedback was then analyzed relative to the number of coexisting conditions. Specifically, the outcome in patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction alone and with one, two, and three other defecographic findings were compared. No statistically significant difference was found among these four groups. CONCLUSION: Although other defecographic findings frequently coexist with paradoxical puborectalis contraction, none of the concomitant findings adversely affected the outcome of biofeedback treatment. Therefore, biofeedback can be recommended to patients with coexistent defecographic findings, with expectation of success in over 50 percent of individuals who complete the course of therapy.     

Dynamic transperineal ultrasound in the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders: pilot study

PURPOSE: Defecating proctography and more recently, magnetic resonance imaging have both been used for diagnosis in patients with pelvic floor dysfunction. This pilot study assessed the feasibility of dynamic transperineal ultrasound in a range of specific disorders affecting evacuation. METHODS: A protocol of sagittal and transverse transperineal imaging was established defining the infralevator viscera and soft tissues and the margins of the puborectalis muscle. Dynamic measurements were possible for the extent of puborectalis shortening, the anorectal angle, and the movement during straining of the anorectal junction. Calculations were made of the depth of demonstrated rectoceles, the posterior urethrovesical angle, and the movement of the urethrovesical junction. Diagnoses were confirmed by proctography (where appropriate) and clinical examination. RESULTS: Transverse images of the anal sphincter were comparable with those obtained using endoanal ultrasonography. Sagittal images permitted the measurement of puborectalis contraction and the anorectal angle comparable with those obtained during defecography. Cystoceles were able to be diagnosed during closure of the posterior urethrovesical angle and abnormal urethrovesical junction descent during straining. Rectoceles, peritoneoceles, enteroceles, and rectoanal intussusception were readily identified using dynamic transperineal ultrasonography. CONCLUSION: Dynamic transperineal ultrasound is a simple, noninvasive way to assess dynamically the interaction of the pelvic viscera and their relationship to the pelvic floor musculature in patients with evacuatory disorders and pelvic floor dysfunction.     

A pilot assessment of whether external coil MRI is useful to assess evacuatory disorders

This study assessed the value of common surface coil mag-netic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with evacuatory disorders including fecal incontinence and constipation. These findings were then compared with those from other standard physiological examinations and/or surgical findings. From July 1996 to June 1997, 14 consecutive patients underwent surface coil MRI for evaluation of either fecal incontinence (n=5) or constipation (n=9). In patients with incontinence we compared the findings from endoanal ultrasound (EAUS), anal MRI, and surgery regarding morphopathological findings of the internal and external anal sphincter components. In constipated patients the findings of videoprography and dynamic pelvic MRI were compared regarding the presence of rectocele, rectoanal intussusception, and sigmoidocele as well as the measurements of anorectal angle and perineal descent. The five incontinent patients were all women, with a median age of 67 years (range 43–77). EAUS revealed an anterior sphincter defect in two patients, a posterior defect in one, and normal anal sphincter images in two. Surgical findings confirmed an anterior external anal sphincter scar in two patients, an internal anal sphincter defect in one, and an anatomically normal anal sphincter in two. In one patient, although anal MRI showed posterior external anal sphincter defect, EAUS and surgery revealed normal external anal sphincter appearance. The accuracy rate between EAUS and anal MRI was only 20%, that between surgery and anal MRI 40%, and that between surgery and EAUS 80%. Thus EAUS was more accurate than anal MRI in incontinent patients. The nine constipated patients were all women, with a mean age of 59 years (range 40–78). Videoproctography revealed an anterior rectocele in six patients, rectoanal intussusception in three, and sigmoidocele in five; no abnormalities were identified in two patients. On dynamic pelvic MRI anterior rectocele was seen in three patients and sigmoidocele in two, and five studies were interpreted as normal. One of the patients underwent sigmoidectomy for sigmoidocele, and five patients were treated by biofeedback. Thus the accuracy rate of dynamic pelvic MRI against videoproctography was 60% for anterior rectocele, 40% for sigmoidocele, and zero for rectoanal intussusception. In conclusion, neither MRI for the evaluation of patients with fecal incontinence nor for the evaluation of patients with constipation added any significant information that would warrant its continued use in these patient groups. Perhaps the more widespread availability of an endoanal coil will alter this conclusion; however, at the present time we cannot routinely endorse the expense, time, or inconvenience of these MRI investigations in patients with these diagnoses. Larger prospective comparative studies are required prior to endorsing the technique. Accepted: 21 February 2000     

Dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and cystocolpoproctography alter surgical management of pelvic floor disorders

PURPOSE: Pelvic organ prolapse results in a spectrum of progressively disabling disorders. Despite attempts to standardize the clinical examination, a variety of imaging techniques are used. The purpose of this study was to evaluate dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic cystocolpoproctography in the surgical management of females with complex pelvic floor disorders. METHODS: Twenty-two patients were identified from The Johns Hopkins Pelvic Floor Disorders Center database who had symptoms of complex pelvic organ prolapse and underwent dynamic magnetic resonance, dynamic cystocolpoproctography, and subsequent multidisciplinary review and operative repair. RESULTS: The mean age of the study group was 58 ± 13 years, and all patients were Caucasian. Constipation (95.5 percent), urinary incontinence (77.3 percent), complaints of incomplete fecal evacuation (59.1 percent), and bulging vaginal tissues (54.4 percent) were the most common complaints on presentation. All patients had multiple complaints with a median number of 4 symptoms (range, 2–8). Physical examination, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging, and dynamic cystocolpoproctography were concordant for rectocele, enterocele, cystocele, and perineal descent in only 41 percent of patients. Dynamic imaging lead to changes in the initial operative plan in 41 percent of patients. Dynamic magnetic resonance was the only modality that identified levator ani hernias. Dynamic cystocolpoproctography identified sigmoidoceles and internal rectal prolapse more often than physical examination or dynamic magnetic resonance. CONCLUSIONS: Levator ani hernias are often missed by physical examination and traditional fluoroscopic imaging. Dynamic magnetic resonance and cystocolpoproctography are complementary studies to the physical examination that may alter the surgical management of females with complex pelvic floor disorders.Presented at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Boston, Massachusetts, June 24 to 29, 2000.No reprints are available.     

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography: a diagnostic alternative in the assessment of pelvic floor disorders in proctology

PURPOSE: Standard diagnostic proctologic procedures in the assessment of pelvic floor disorders include clinical evaluation and endoscopy. Particular aspects of combined pelvic floor disorders, especially those involving more than one pelvic compartment, may remain undetected without additional technical diagnostic procedures such as videoproctoscopy, cinedefecography, or colpocystodefecography. The aim of the study was to review the potentials of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography to elucidate the underlying anatomic and pathophysiologic background of pelvic floor disorders in proctologic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography was performed in 20 Patients (13 females) with main diagnoses such as rectal prolapse or intussusception, rectocele, descending perineum, fecal incontinence, outlet obstruction, and dyskinetic puborectalis muscle after clinical evaluation. The investigation was performed on a 1.5 T-magnetic resonance imaging machine in supine position. The rectum was filled with Gd-DTPA enriched ultrasound gel. First a T1/T2 weighted investigation of the pelvis was performed, followed by defecography with evacuation of the rectum. Images were obtained in a sagittal plane in a frequency of 1 image/second (true FISP) at rest and during straining. The obtained magnetic resonance imaging video tapes were analyzed off-line with cinematographic evaluation of bladder base, uterus, and anal canal position in relation to the pubococcygeal line by a blinded radiologist. Investigation time was 20 minutes. RESULTS: In dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography of the pelvic floor, 12 patients with descending perineum, 10 rectoceles (10 females), 6 cystoceles (6 females), 4 enteroceles (4 females), 8 intussusceptions (5 females), and a dyskinetic puborectalis muscle in 3 males were detected. In 11 females and 3 males multifocal disorders were found, involving more than one compartment in females, whereas in males complex defects were restricted to the posterior compartment. Magnetic resonance imaging defecography revealed diagnoses consistent with clinical results in 77.3 percent and defects in addition to clinical diagnoses in combined pelvic floor disorders in 34 percent. CONCLUSIONS: In complex pelvic floor disorders, involving more than a single defect, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging represents a convenient diagnostic procedure in females and to a lesser extent in males, in particular in terms of dynamic imaging of pelvic floor organs during defecation. In addition to the clinical assessment, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging had clinical impact in proctologic and interdisciplinary treatment.Presented in part at the 116th German Congress of Surgery, 1999     

Is barium trapping in rectoceles significant?

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine whether rectocele size and contrast retention are significant. METHODS: Evacuation proctography and simultaneous intrarectal pressure measurements from a small, noncompliant balloon catheter were performed in three matched groups of 11 constipated female patients with rectoceles, rectoceles and contrast trapping of >10 percent, and no rectocele. Computerized image analysis was used to measure rectocele area and evacuation. RESULTS: In the two groups with rectoceles, there was no significant difference in rectocele area or width pre-evacuation. The anorectal angle, pelvic floor descent, maximum anal canal width, evacuation time or completeness, maximum and distal intrarectal pressure, or need to digitate did not differ significantly between the groups. In seven patients with barium trapping (64 percent) the intrarectal pressure dropped abruptly as the balloon entered the rectocele, suggesting that trapping results from sequestration into the vagina, closing part of the rectocele from the normal intrarectal pressure zone. CONCLUSION: Because no impairment of evacuation appears to be associated with either a large rectocele or trapping, these evacuation problems should not be directly attributed to these proctographic findings.Mr. Halligan was funded by the St. Mark's Research Foundation.     

Relationship between results of radiological pelvic floor study and anorectal manometry in patients consulting for constipation

The aim of this study was to assess (a) the incidence of perineal descent and (b) the relationship between radiological abnormalities of the pelvic floor and rectoanal manometric disturbances in patients consulting for constipation. Lateral radiographs in both the left lateral and supine positions studied pelvic floor descent. Results obtained in the 25 patients (mean age 47 years) studied were compared with those of 12 controls (mean age 58 years). Pelvic floor descent, never seen in controls, was demonstrated in 14 patients who were older (53±3 years, mean ±SD) than the 11 with a normal radiological examination (38±3 years,p<0.05). Anal low pressures (3 cases) and a low amplitude of rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) (5 cases) were shown only in patients with perineal descent and anal high pressures only in those with normal radiology. Our results suggest that (a) perineal descent is a common finding in over 50% of constipated patients and (b) anorectal motility is related to pelvic floor function.     

Parameters of anorectal and colonic motility in health and in severe constipation

Anorectal function and colonic transit was assessed in 17 severely constipated patients and 15 age-matched controls. The constipated patients were divided into those who had immobile perineum (perineal descent 1.0 cm during attempted defecation) and those who had a normal descent (>1.0 cm) of the perineum. When constipation was accompanied by an immobile perineum, patients had impaired balloon expulsion, impaired and delayed artificial stool expulsion, decreased straightening of the anorectal angle, decreased descent of the pelvic floor with defecation, and prolonged rectosigmoid colon transit compared with the patients with constipation who had a mobile perineum and with normal controls. The mobile-perineum group differed from controls only in colon transit times, having prolonged total colon transit. Anal sphincter resting pressures, immediate artificial stool expulsion, resting anorectal angles, and electromyography of the external anal sphincter and puborectalis did not differentiate the constipated patients from the controls. We concluded that descent of the perineum of <1 cm was associated with impaired expulsion, an adynamic anorectal angle, and slowed distal colon transit. This simple sign of pelvic floor function distinguished constipated patients with disordered expulsion from constipated patients with normal pelvic floor function. These patients may respond poorly to surgery and conventional management and would therefore be candidates instead for pelvic floor retraining. Accurate characterization and appreciation of pelvic floor dysfunction in patients with severe chronic constipation may improve the selection for and results of surgical and nonsurgical intervention.Supported in part by Research Grants DK37990, RR585, and DK34988 from the National Institutes of Health and by the Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota.     

How accurate is clinical examination in diagnosing and quantifying pelvirectal disorders? A prospective study in a group of 50 patients complaining of defecatory difficulties

We prospectively evaluated 50 patients (38 females and 12 males; mean age, 44.7±15 years) who complained of defecatory difficulties to determine the accuracy of the clinical examination in diagnosing and quantifying pelvirectal abnormalities. Each parameter was then compared with the features of anorectal manometry and evacuation proctography performed by two independent observers. Global agreement between clinical diagnosis and the reference method (radiology for rectoceles, rectal intussusceptions, and abnormal perineal descent; manometry for anismus) was observed in 80 percent of cases. In rectoceles, anismus, and rectal intussusceptions especially, excellent negative predictive values were obtained (96, 96, and 80 percent, respectively). Clinical examination always diagnosed high-grade intussusceptions. Nevertheless, abnormal perineal descent was poorly evaluated in 20 patients. When compared with anal manometry, digital assessment was able to quantify resting and squeeze pressures and length of the anal canal with excellent correlation and good global agreement as well as predicting a short or hypotonic anal canal. Clinical assessment is usually sufficient and accurate in most pelvirectal disorders encountered in patients complaining of defecatory difficulties. Both anorectal manometry and evacuation proctography retain a definite but limited place in investigating pelvirectal disorders.Presented at the Digestive Disease Week, American Gastroenterological Association, San Francisco, California, May 13, 1992.     

Perineal descent and levator ani hernia: a dynamic magnetic resonance imaging study

PURPOSE: Patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse often have multifocal pelvic floor defects that are not always evident of physical examination. In this study, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of symptomatic patients with pelvic floor prolapse demonstrated unsuspected levator ani hernia. This study was designed to identify any specific symptoms and/or physical findings associated with these hernias.METHODS: Eighty consecutive patients with pelvic organ prolapse, fecal and/or urinary incontinence, or chronic constipation received standardized questionnaires, physical examination, and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Fishers exact test was used to compare symptoms and examination findings between patients with or without levator ani hernia.RESULTS: Twelve patients (15 percent) were found to have unilateral (n = 8) or bilateral (n = 4) levator ani hernias on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. No one specific symptom was directly associated with the presence of a levator ani hernia. Furthermore, levator ani hernias were not found more frequently in patients with previous pelvic floor surgery. Perineal descent on physical examination was associated with the finding of a levator ani hernia in nine patients (P = 0.02). Although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward a lower incidence of levator ani hernia in females using estrogen replacement therapy (P = 0.06).CONCLUSIONS: Patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and perineal descent on physical examination may have a levator ani hernia. Although the significance of levator ani hernia needs to be determined, the recurrence rate after the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse remains unacceptably high, and ongoing investigation of all associated abnormalities is warranted.Data were obtained from the Johns Hopkins Pelvic Floor Database. Poster presentation at The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgery Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, June 24 to 29, 2000.     

Radiologic studies of rectal evacuation in adults with idiopathic constipation

A consecutive series of 58 patients with idiopathic constipation and 20 control subjects were studied by evacuation proctography and measurements were made of changes during rectal expulsion. A wide range was found in the control group. The anorectal angle, pelvic floor descent, and the presence or size of an anterior rectocele did not discriminate between the control and patient groups. Internal intussusception was rare. Among constipated patients, the only significant differences from normal were in the time taken to expel barium and the amount of barium remaining in the distal rectum. The majority of control subjects (15 of 20) evacuated most of the barium within 20 seconds whereas 45 of 58 constipated patients took a longer time. Using the area of barium on a lateral view of the rectum as a measure, 19 of 20 control subjects evacuated at least 60 percent of the barium from the distal 4 cm of the rectum compared with only 25 of 58 patients. A varying degree of defecatory impairment was thus established among many patients with constipation. The patients were subdivided into those with a normal or abnormal whole gut transit rate as an indication of colonic function, and those who did or did not need to digitally evacuate the rectum as a clinical manifestation of an anorectal disorder. No obvious differences were found between these subgroups using the parameters measured.     

Abdominal rectovaginopexy

PURPOSE: We noted the combination of obstructed defecation or constipation and fecal incontinence, the poor results of abdominal rectopexy for constipation, and the well-known risk of postoperative induction of constipation after rectopexy. We developed a new operation to treat patients with constipation or fecal incontinence (with a concomitant rectocele, internal rectal intussusception, enterocele at dynamic defecography, or all three) or both. This new rectopexy technique avoided dorsolateral mobilization of the rectum and did not endanger the hypogastric nerves and pelvic autonomic nerves. A better effect on constipation compared with rectopexies with dorsolateral mobilization was expected. METHODS: The results of this new operation, which was called rectovaginopexy, were studied prospectively in a series of 27 patients. Four-year results were obtained. Preoperative and postoperative questionnaires, dynamic defecograms, and anorectal physiology studies were analyzed. RESULTS: Before the operation 17 patients were constipated, compared with 4 patients one year after rectovaginopexy (76 percent improvement;P=0.0015) and 5 patients four years after rectovaginopexy (71 percent improvement;P=0.005), respectively. At one year, fecal incontinence decreased significantly: 15 of 17 patients improved and 9 patients became fully continent (P=0.0007). Four years after rectovaginopexy the effect on fecal incontinence was no longer significant (P=0.09). Rectovaginopexy restored anatomy: all (9) enteroceles, all but 1 (17) internal rectal intussusception, and 12 of 20 rectoceles dissolved, and the majority were reduced in size. Rectal sensation for distention was unchanged, and rectal electrosensitivity improved (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Rectovaginopexy provides significant one-year improvement of both constipation and fecal incontinence. The positive effect on constipation did not deteriorate with time, in contrast to the effect on fecal incontinence.     

Association of anterior ectopic anus and partial absence of levator musculature in a woman with impaired defecation

A 25-year-old nulliparous woman with adult onset constipation and slight anterior displacement of the anus underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and was diagnosed with congenital hemiabsence of the levator ani sling. Impaired defecation was confirmed by anorectal function studies and defecography demonstrated an anterior rectocele, perineal descent at the upper limit of normal, and partial obstruction of defecation, which appeared related to the levator sling abnormality. To our knowledge, this combination of findings has not been previously described as a cause of adult onset constipation.     

Physiological studies in young women with chronic constipation

Manometric, radiological and neurophysiological investigations were performed on 34 women, aged between 14 and 53, who suffered with chronic constipation refractory to treatment, and on 27 agematched normal female control subjects. The constipated patients had more difficulty in evacuating simulated stools than control subjects and 13 out of 19 patients tested obstructed defaecation by contracting the external sphincter during straining. The constipated group required a greater degree of rectal distension than control subjects to induce rectal contractions, anal relaxation and a desire to defaecate. Other modalities of rectal sensation were normal in the constipated subjects. Compared with controls, constipated patients had significantly lower anal pressures, an abnormal degree of perineal descent on straining and an obtuse anorectal angulation at rest. These results were compatible with weakness of the pelvic floor and neuropathic damage to the external sphincter. Mouth to anus transit time was abnormally prolonged in 60% of constipated patients, but was within the normal range in the remainder. Anorectal function in patients with slow transit was not significantly different from that in patients with a normal transit time. The mouth to caecum transit time of a standard meal was prolonged in constipated patients irrespective of the duration of the whole gut transit. Gastric emptying was not significantly prolonged.     

Are pelvic floor movements abnormal in disordered defecation?

Pelvic floor movements were assessed by videoproctography in 126 subjects: neuropathic fecal incontinence patients (n=44), chronic constipation patients (n =52), and controls (n=30). A significantly lower pelvic floor position at rest and a more obtuse anorectal angle were found in incontinent patients than in controls (P <0.01). constipated patients showed no significant difference from controls at rest. There was less pelvic floor movement during contraction in incontinent patients than in controls, indicating a flaccid, noncontractile pelvic floor in neuropathic incontinence. Movement during contraction in constipated subjects was also less than in controls. Changes in the pelvic floor position during straining were the same as in controls. These data indicate that the pelvic floor is flaccid and noncontractile in neuropathic fecal incontinence, which supports the concept of a progressive neuropathy involving the sacral outflow. Similar changes are not seen at rest in patients with constipation even though they have a long history of straining.     

Efficacy of Fibrin Sealant in the Management of Complex Anal Fistula

PURPOSE: A prospective trial was conducted to establish long-term healing of complex idiopathic anorectal fistula, without extension, after fibrin glue treatment, with clinical assessment and magnetic resonance imaging to determine tract healing. METHODS: Twenty-two patients undergoing glue instillation after fistula curettage and irrigation were followed up for a median of 14 months. Clinical assessment, short tau inversion recovery sequence magnetic resonance imaging, and combined short tau inversion recovery and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were performed at a median of three months postoperatively, and their ability to predict outcome in the presence of early skin healing was determined. RESULTS: Of 22 patients, 19 (86.5 percent) had transsphincteric fistulas, 1 (4.5 percent) had a suprasphincteric fistula, 1 (4.5 percent) had an extrasphincteric fistula, and 1 (4.5 percent) had a rectovaginal fistula. None had clinical or radiologic evidence of secondary extension. Despite skin healing in 17 (77 percent) of 22 patients at a median of 14 days after treatment, only 3 (14 percent) remained healed at 16 months. Magnetic resonance imaging with short tau inversion recovery sequences in combination with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging predicted outcome in all 10 assessments (100 percent), compared with short tau inversion recovery sequence alone in 16 (94 percent) of 17 assessments or clinical examination in 12 (71 percent) of 17 (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of fibrin glue application for complex anorectal fistulas without extension is 14 percent. Magnetic resonance imaging predicts outcome at an earlier stage than clinical examination.     

Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing deep anorectal abscesses

PURPOSE: We evaluated the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging for the preoperative diagnosis of deep anorectal abscesses. METHODS: Subjects were 21 patients with deep anorectal abscesses. Deep anorectal abscesses were classified into two types, ischiorectal and pelvirectal, according to their location. Patients were also classified into a single abscess group, which showed either an ischiorectal or pelvirectal abscess, and a double abscess group, which showed both ischiorectal and pelvirectal abscesses. The final diagnosis was made from surgical findings, and the types of deep anorectal abscesses determined by digital examination and magnetic resonance imaging were compared. RESULTS: Sensitivity of ischiorectal abscesses (20 lesions) with digital examination and magnetic resonance imaging was 75 and 95 percent, respectively, and that of pelvirectal abscesses (10 lesions) with digital examination and magnetic resonance imaging was 60 and 70 percent, respectively. Sensitivity of the magnetic resonance imaging was significantly higher than that of digital examination in ischiorectal abscesses. Diagnostic accuracy of digital examination and magnetic resonance imaging were both 83 percent in the single abscess group (12 patients), whereas in the double abscess group (9 patients) it was 22 and 78 percent, respectively. The rate of accurate diagnosis of magnetic resonance imaging compared with digital examination in the double abscess group was significantly higher than that in the single abscess group. CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance imaging was useful for diagnosing and differentiating ischiorectal and pelvirectal abscesses.