The unconditioned stimulus pre‐exposure effect in preweanling rats in taste aversion learning: Role of the training context and injection cues

The unconditioned stimulus pre‐exposure effect (US‐PE) refers to the interference paradigm in which acquisition of the conditioned response is retarded due to prior experience with the US. Most studies analyzing the psychological mechanisms underlying this effect have been conducted with adult rats. The most widely accepted hypothesis explains this effect as a contextual blocking effect. Contextual cues associated with the US block the conditioned stimulus (CS)‐US association during conditioning. The modulatory role of a context devoid of distinctive olfactory attributes is not observable until approximately PD23 in rats, including modulation of interference paradigms such as latent inhibition or extinction. In this study, we analyzed US‐PE in preweanling rats along with the role of the training context in this effect in terms of conditioned taste aversion preparation. Pre‐exposure to LiCl before conditioning retarded the acquisition of taste aversion. The US‐PE was observed in preweanling rats when, during pre‐exposure, subjects were exposed to the conditioning context, and this effect was not attenuated either by the administration of the US in a familiar environment (Experiment 1a), or by the presence of an alternative, more salient context during pre‐exposure (Experiment 1b). Additionally, the US‐PE was still observed when the route by which the US was administered was changed between the pre‐exposure and conditioning phases (Experiment 2a) as well as when the injection cues were removed during conditioning (Experiment 2b). These experiments show a strong US‐PE in preweanling rats and fail to support the contextual blocking hypothesis, at least in this stage of ontogeny. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 55: 193–204, 2013     

Effects of stimulus preexposure on the generalization of conditioned taste aversions in infant rats

Generalization of a conditioned taste aversion in infant rats and how this is affected by stimulus preexposure was investigated in a series of experiments. In Experiment 1 generalization of a conditioned aversion between two tastes (sweet and salty) was found, and the effect of tastes preexposure was a reduction in generalization (Experiment 2). However, when these tastes were combined with a common taste (acid) that was less (Experiment 3) or more intense (Experiment 3b), the effect of stimulus preexposure was a stronger generalization of the conditioned aversion. In this case, a reduction on generalization was again observed by increasing the number of preexposure trials to the taste compounds (Experiment 4). In all cases the generalization levels were directly related to the effect of stimulus preexposure on the acquisition rate of conditioning. It can be concluded that, with the appropriate parameters, a reduction of generalization of a conditioned taste aversion can be obtained after taste exposure in preweanling rats.     

Familiarization and cross-familiarization of wheel running and LiCl in conditioned taste aversion

Familiarization with an unconditioned stimulus (US) interferes with the learning of subsequent Pavlovian conditioned associations. We conducted a series of experiments exploiting this US preexposure effect to elucidate the underlying mechanism of conditioned taste aversion in rats induced by voluntary wheel running. Experiment 1 demonstrated that running-induced taste aversion was alleviated if rats had sufficient experience of running in advance. In Experiments 2A and 2B, preexposure to wheel running had no effect on subsequent taste aversion conditioning by lithium chloride (LiCl) injection. In Experiment 3, however, we observed a weak partial interference from the LiCl injection pretreatment to the subsequent conditioning by wheel running US. This US crossover effect suggests the possibility that wheel running and LiCl injection share a common or similar physiological mechanism in inducing taste aversion.     

Ontogenetic differences in the effects of unpaired stimulus preexposure on eyeblink conditioning in the rat

Learned irrelevance (LIr) is a Pavlovian conditioning phenomenon in which random or unpaired preexposure to a conditional stimulus (CS) and to an unconditional stimulus (US) retards subsequent paired conditioning involving these stimuli. A previous developmental study of eyeblink conditioning in the rat suggested that LIr is not present on postnatal Day 20. Stanton, Fox, and Carter (1998) showed that unpaired preexposure to a CS and a US on postnatal Day 17 failed to retard (and, in fact, facilitated) subsequent paired conditioning involving these stimuli on postnatal Day 20. The present experiments were designed to further characterize the ontogeny of this phenomenon. In Experiment 1, LIr was observed when rat pups were tested for eyeblink conditioning as described in Stanton et al. (1998), except that preexposure occurred on postnatal Day 27, and acquisition testing occurred on postnatal Day 30. In Experiment 2, preexposure and acquisition both occurred on postnatal Day 30, and four types of preexposure were compared: chamber only, CS alone, US alone, or unpaired presentation of CS and US. Unpaired preexposure impaired acquisition relative to that of the remaining three groups, which did not differ. Experiment 3, showed that under the conditions of Experiment 2, LIr failed to appear on postnatal Day 20, but was observed on postnatal Days 25 and 30. These findings suggest that learning that events are unrelated emerges between postnatal Days 20 and 25 in the rat. Possible behavioral and neural mechanisms underlying this effect are discussed.     

Latent inhibition in the developing rat: an examination of context-specific effects

Latent inhibition (LI) refers to the reduction in conditioned responding when the conditioned stimulus (CS) is preexposed prior to CS-unconditioned stimulus pairings. Experiment 1a demonstrated that preexposure to an odor CS prior to odor-shock pairings markedly reduced conditioned freezing in 25-day-old rats; however, this LI effect was observed only if odor preexposure and odor-shock pairings occurred in the same context (i.e., LI was context-specific at this age). The results of Experiment 1b showed that 18-day-olds also exhibited LI, but this effect was not context-specific at this age. In Experiment 2, rats were preexposed to the odor at 18 days of age and given odor-shock pairings at 25 days of age. These rats exhibited context-specific latent inhibition, suggesting that 18-day-old rats encoded the preexposure context. In Experiment 3, all parameters were identical to Experiment 2, with the exception that odor-shock pairings were given at approximately PN18 and testing occurred at approximately PN25. These rats exhibited latent inhibition at test, but this effect was not context-specific. The results of this study suggest that (a) PN18 rats can exhibit latent inhibition, and (b) the expression of context-specific latent inhibition depends on the age at which conditioning occurs.     

Central gustatory lesions and learned taste aversions: unconditioned stimuli

The efficacy of two different unconditioned stimuli (US) in producing conditioned taste aversion (CTA) was tested in rats after bilateral ibotenic acid (IBO) lesions of the gustatory nucleus of thalamus (TTAx) and the medial and lateral parabrachial nuclei (mPBNx, lPBNx). An initial study determined an equivalent dose for the two USs, LiCl and cyclophosphamide (CY), using non-lesioned rats. Subsequently, using a separate set of lesioned animals and their sham controls (SHAM), injections of CY were paired 3 times with one of two taste stimuli (CSs), 0.1 M NaCl for half the rats in each group, 0.2 M sucrose for the other half. After these conditioning trials, the CS was presented twice more without the US, first in a 1-bottle test, then in a 2-bottle choice with water. The acquisition and test trials had 2 intervening water-only days to assure complete rehydration. Two weeks later, the same rats were tested again for acquisition of a CTA using LiCl as the US and the opposite CS as that used during the CY trials. The SHAM and TTAx groups learned to avoid consuming the taste associated with either CY or LiCl treatment. The two PBNx groups failed to learn an aversion regardless of the US.     

Multiple remote-US preexposures and the blocking effect produced by a proximal-US

Weanling, young-adult, and old-age Wistar albino rats were used to determine whether number of unconditioned stimulus (US) presentations, given 24 h or more (remote preexposure) prior to conditioning, alters the blocking effect of a single-US preexposure given 2 h before (proximal) taste aversion conditioning. As the number of remote-US preexposures increased from 0 to 6, the ability of the proximal-US preexposure to block conditioning initially increased then decreased for all age groups. Of the models put forth to explain US preexposure effects on conditioned taste aversion (CTA), only Wagner's information processing model adequately explained the reduction of the blocking effect of the proximal-US preexposure produced as a result of increasing remote-US preexposures.     

Odor-aversion learning by rats following LiCl exposure: ontogenetic influences

The influence of LiCl preexposure on odor-aversion conditioning produced by an odor-LiCl pairing was studied in rats 7-31 days old. LiCl preexposure interfered with the acquisition of the odor aversion in both young and old pups. The time course of this effect depended, however, on the age of the pups. It lasted much longer (over 24 hr) if pups 8-17 days old were preexposed to LiCl than if the pups were preexposed when 30 days old (less 12 hr). Alternative interpretations of these data were discussed, and it was suggested that the age-dependent differences in the time course of the LiCl preexposed effect may be determined in part by age-related differences in the rat's excretory processes that clear lithium from the circulatory system.     

Effects of conditioned stimulus preexposure on human electrodermal conditioning

Two experiments investigated the effects of conditioned stimulus (CS) preexposure on Pavlovian differential conditioning and extinction of the skin conductance response. In both experiments, half the subjects were exposed to 20 presentations each of the CS+ and CS-, and the other half were exposed to control stimuli. CS duration was 8 sec. The unconditioned stimulus in Experiment 1 (N = 48) was a 1000 Hz tone of 80 dB which signalled a reaction time requirement, and in Experiment 2 (N = 48), it was a 1 sec burst of white noise at 105 dB. The results of Experiment 1 indicated that no-preexposure groups displayed more CS+/CS- differentiation than preexposure groups during acquisition and more resistance to extinction, at least for the first interval anticipatory response. In addition, the results of Experiment 2 indicated that no-preexposure groups displayed more differentiation than preexposure groups in terms of the second interval anticipatory response. These data constitute a demonstration of the latent inhibition effect with human subjects, and imply that there is an intrinsic relationship between the orienting response and the conditioning process.     

Synergism of a compound unconditioned stimulus in taste aversion conditioning

Anti-lymphocyte serum (ALS) and lithium chloride have both previously been used successfully as unconditioned stimuli in taste aversion conditioning paradigms in rats. This report substantiates those findings but shows that when the two stimuli are given as a compound unconditioned stimulus in association with saccharin flavoured drinking solution, the conditioned taste aversion response following a second exposure to saccharin alone is more profound than that following conditioning with either ALS or LiCl alone. These results demonstrate synergism between the two stimuli when given together.     

Taste-potentiated odor aversion learning: role of the amygdaloid basolateral complex and central nucleus.

The present study examined the relative contributions of the amygdaloid basolateral complex (ABL) and central nucleus (CN) to taste-potentiated odor aversion (TPOA) learning--an associative learning task that is dependent on information processing in two sensory modalities. In Experiment 1, rats with neurotoxic lesions of these systems were trained on the TPOA task by presenting a compound taste-odor conditioned stimulus, which was followed by LiCl administration. Results showed that ABL damage caused an impairment in potentiated odor aversion learning but no deficit in the conditioned taste aversion. In contrast, rats with CN damage learned both tasks. Experiment 2 examined the effects of ABL damage on TPOA and odor discrimination learning. The odor discrimination procedure used a place preference task to demonstrate normal processing of olfactory information. Results indicated that although ABL-lesioned animals were impaired on TPOA, there was no deficit in odor discrimination learning.     

Effects of distribution of the drug unconditioned stimulus on taste-aversion learning

Rats injected with lithium chloride after exposure to a taste or olfactory stimulus learn stronger aversions to these cues if the drug is administered in two small injections 35 min apart than if all of the drug is given in a single injection. This facilitation of conditioning produced by distribution of the drug unconditioned stimulus occurs with both low and high lithium doses (Experiments 1 and 2), is more evident in male than in female rats (Experiment 1), and is directly related to the amount of the flavored solution consumed prior to drug treatment (Experiment 4). Increasing the interval between two small drug injections beyond an optimal value results in a progressive loss of the facilitation of conditioning (Experiments 2 and 3), and the optimal drug distribution interval may be shorter for olfactory cues (Experiment 3) than for taste stimuli (Experiments 1 and 2). Control observations (Experiments 5A and 5B) showed that the drug distribution effect is not due to handling or other non-drug factors involved in giving two rather than only one injection. The phenomenon is consistent with recently-proposed models of conditioning and suggests that the differential effectiveness of various drugs in taste aversion conditioning may be related to differences in the time course of the unconditioned drug effects.     

Cessation of male rat copulatory behavior using illness as punishment: facilitation with a novel odor

Two experiments were conducted to examine learned copulatory avoidance in male rats. One group of males was presented with receptive females that had been sprayed with a 2% almond solution, and the other group was presented with nonalmond odorous, receptive females. Following each test, males were made ill with lithium chloride (LiCl) by intragastric intubation or intraperitoneal injection. Results showed that male rats presented with almond-odorous females developed significant avoidance of copulatory behavior. Conditioning in males exposed to receptive females without the almond odor developed little, if any, avoidance. In Experiment 2, it was found that route of LiCl administration was not a factor in the results.     

Effects of Conditioned Stimulus Fear-Relevance and Preexposure on Expectancy and Electrodermal Measures of Human Pavlovian Conditioning

The present research investigated the effects of fear-relevance of the conditioned stimulus (CS) and CS preexposure on human electrodermal conditioning and on a continuous measure of expectancy of the unconditioned stimulus (US). Both experiments employed 20 preexposure, 8 acquisition, and 8 extinction trials in a differential Pavlovian conditioning paradigm with shock as the US. In Experiment 1 (N = 48), electrodermal conditioning was retarded by CS preexposure, but was not influenced by fear-relevance of the CS. Expectancy of the US was retarded by preexposure only in the fear-relevant condition. In Experiment 2 (N = 48), the CS/US contingencies was embedded in a visual masking task. Preexposure retarded both electrodermal conditioning and US expectancy. Neither measure was influenced by fear-relevance of the CS. However, fewer subjects in the preexposure condition learned the CS/US relationship and those who did, did so on later trial than those in the no-preexposure condition. Thus, the results indicated clear retardation of conditioning as a result of preexposure, but no reliable effect of fear-relevance.     

Effects of water deprivation and prior LiCl exposure in conditioning taste aversions

The phenomenon of attenuated taste aversion conditioning following preexposure to a lithium chloride UCS was demonstrated in Experiment 1. The amount of fluid consumed during the preconditioning phase was shown to be a factor in the degree of attenuated conditioning. The pharmacological properties of LiCl, and the effects of either ad lib or restricted fluid intake in conjunction with state dependent variables were proposed to account for the results. In Experiment 2 the water scheduling and LiCl habituation procedures of Experiment 1 were replicated, and serum lithium was assessed in the various groups on conditioning day. The groups did not differ, ruling out an incremental illness hypothesis of attenuated conditioning.     

When pentobarbital is the conditioned stimulus and amphetamine is the unconditioned stimulus, conditioning depends on the type of conditioned response

Injections of drugs into rats were used as conditioned stimuli (CSs) and as unconditioned stimuli (USs). With heart rate (HR) conditioning, the pentobarbital CS produces a higher HR than under control conditions. With avfail (aversion failure) conditioning, the pentobarbital CS loses much of its capacity to induce a conditioned taste aversion. HR conditioning was obtained with forward delays of up to 30 min and backward delays of up to 270 min, where the delays are defined by the interinjection interval. Avfail was obtained with forward delays of up to 270 min but not with backward delays. Neither HR conditioning nor avfail were context specific but could be demonstrated in a test apparatus after pairings that occurred in the home cage. This indicated that the external environment was not an important part of the effective stimulus complex. When HR conditioning was obtained, its latency and duration was not related to the delay between the CS and US injections or whether they were forward or backward.     

Dopamine manipulations limited to preexposure are sufficient to modulate latent inhibition

Four experiments are reported that demonstrated that dopamine (DA) transmission is involved in the acquisition of latent inhibition (LI) of a conditioned taste aversion. LI refers to weaker conditioning as a consequence of nonreinforced preexposure (PE) of the future conditioned stimulus. Although it is known to depend on DA transmission during the conditioning phase, it is usually thought that the cognitive processes involved in the establishment of LI (during the PE phase) are DA independent. Either amphetamine (AMPH; 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg) or haloperidol (HAL; 0.1 mg/kg) were injected before 1 or all of the 3 PE sessions. AMPH blocked the acquisition of LI if it was injected before each or before only the last PE session and HAL potentiated LI. ((c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).     

The biphasic effect of morphine on odor conditioning in neonatal rats.

Three experiments examined the dose-dependent biphasic effect of morphine on odor conditioning in neonatal rats. In Experiment 1, a single pairing of an odor and a low dose of morphine (0.5 mg/kg) in 5-day-old rats produced an odor preference, relative to an unpaired control group. In Experiment 2, pairing an odor with a high dose of morphine (2.0 mg/kg) produced an odor aversion, relative to an unpaired control group. A third experiment compared performance of a group given odor and morphine (2.0 mg/kg) paired to that of two unpaired groups: one given morphine 24 hr prior to and the other 24 hr after odor exposure. The paired group showed an odor aversion relative to both of the unpaired groups, which did not differ. The latter finding suggests that even if morphine metabolism is incomplete after 24 hr, behavior is unaffected. These results are discussed in reference to the functional development of the opioid system in rats.     

Postconditioning recovery from the latent inhibition effect in conditioned taste aversion

Two experiments were conducted examining the effects of flavor (CS) preexposure on the retention of conditioned taste aversion. In Experiment 1, rats received preexposure to sucrose solution followed by a sucrose-illness pairing. The expected “latent inhibition” effect was obtained when testing occurred after a two-day but not an eleven-day training-to-test interval. Experiment 2 extended these results by employing five- and twenty-one-day training-to-test interval parameters and provided evidence that the stronger taste aversion displayed by preexposed subjects following long retention intervals is not attributable to differences in training consumption of sucrose solution. This posttraining increase in conditioned taste aversion (CTA) suggests that preexposure blocks expression of memory.     

Involvement of the anterior insular gustatory neocortex in taste-potentiated odor aversion learning

When an odor conditioned stimulus (CS) precedes illness (unconditioned stimulus; UCS), rats acquire relatively weak odor aversions. Conversely, when a compound odor-taste (flavor) CS precedes illness, rats acquire robust aversions both to the odor and to the taste components of a compound flavor CS. Thus, tastes potentiate odor-illness aversions during toxiphobic conditioning. Such conditioning effects have been referred to as taste-potentiated odor aversion learning (POA). Previous neurobehavioral experiments have shown that the anterior insular gustatory neocortex contributes to conditioned taste aversion (CTA) learning. The present experiment examined the involvement of the anterior insular gustatory neocortex in CTA learning and POA learning. To that end, four distinct groups of rats received bilateral electrolytic lesion placements in the orbitofrontal neocortex, the "somatic" gustatory neocortex, the anterior insular gustatory neocortex or the posterior insular neocortex. Control animals received anesthesia only. Subgroups of animals thereafter received aversion conditioning using either an odor (almond) CS or a compound odor-taste (almond-saccharin) CS. Aversions to the almond odorant and/or saccharin tastant were evaluated during extinction. Results indicated that animals lacking orbitofrontal neocortex or posterior insular neocortex acquired normal CTAs and POAs. Animals lacking somatic gustatory neocortex exhibited impaired CTA learning, yet those animals showed normal POA learning. Lesions centered in the anterior insular neocortex impaired both CTA learning and POA learning. These results demonstrate that the insular gustatory neocortex is uniquely involved in the higher-order integration of odors, tastes and illness.