Loading of the human 9-1-1 checkpoint complex onto DNA by the checkpoint clamp loader hRad17-replication factor C complex in vitro

The human DNA damage sensors, Rad17-replication factor C (Rad17-RFC) and the Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 (9-1-1) checkpoint complex, are thought to be involved in the early steps of the DNA damage checkpoint response. Rad17-RFC and the 9-1-1 complex have been shown to be structurally similar to the replication factors, RFC clamp loader and proliferating cell nuclear antigen polymerase clamp, respectively. Here, we demonstrate functional similarities between the replication and checkpoint clamp loader/DNA clamp pairs. When all eight subunits of the two checkpoint complexes are coexpressed in insect cells, a stable Rad17-RFC/9-1-1 checkpoint supercomplex forms in vivo and is readily purified. The two individually purified checkpoint complexes also form a supercomplex in vitro, which depends on ATP and is mediated by interactions between Rad17 and Rad9. Rad17-RFC binds to nicked circular, gapped, and primed DNA and recruits the 9-1-1 complex in an ATP-dependent manner. Electron microscopic analyses of the reaction products indicate that the 9-1-1 ring is clamped around the DNA.     

The human Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 checkpoint complex stimulates flap endonuclease 1

The toroidal damage checkpoint complex Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 (9-1-1) has been characterized as a sensor of DNA damage. Flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) is a structure-specific nuclease involved both in removing initiator RNA from Okazaki fragments and in DNA repair pathways. FEN1 activity is stimulated by proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a toroidal sliding clamp that acts as a platform for DNA replication and repair complexes. We show that 9-1-1 also binds and stimulates FEN1. Stimulation is observed on a variety of flap, nick, and gapped substrates simulating repair intermediates. Blocking 9-1-1 entry to the double strands prevents a portion of the stimulation. Like PCNA stimulation, 9-1-1 stimulation cannot circumvent the tracking mechanism by which FEN1 enters the substrate; however, 9-1-1 does not substitute for PCNA in the stimulation of DNA polymerase beta. This suggests that 9-1-1 is a damage-specific activator of FEN1.     

Purification and characterization of human DNA damage checkpoint Rad complexes

Checkpoint Rad proteins function early in the DNA damage checkpoint signaling cascade to arrest cell cycle progression in response to DNA damage. This checkpoint ensures the transmission of an intact genetic complement to daughter cells. To learn about the damage sensor function of the human checkpoint Rad proteins, we purified a heteropentameric complex composed of hRad17-RFCp36-RFCp37-RFCp38-RFCp40 (hRad17-RFC) and a heterotrimeric complex composed of hRad9-hHus1-hRad1 (checkpoint 9-1-1 complex). hRad17-RFC binds to DNA, with a preference for primed DNA and possesses weak ATPase activity that is stimulated by primed DNA and single-stranded DNA. hRad17-RFC forms a complex with the 9-1-1 heterotrimer reminiscent of the replication factor C/proliferating cell nuclear antigen clamp loader/sliding clamp complex of the replication machinery. These findings constitute biochemical support for models regarding the roles of checkpoint Rads as damage sensors in the DNA damage checkpoint response of human cells.     

Transcription factor TFIIH and DNA endonuclease Rad2 constitute yeast nucleotide excision repair factor 3: implications for nucleotide excision repair and Cockayne syndrome.

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) of ultraviolet light-damaged DNA in eukaryotes requires a large number of highly conserved protein factors. Recent studies in yeast have suggested that NER involves the action of distinct protein subassemblies at the damage site rather than the placement there of a "preformed repairosome" containing all the essential NER factors. Neither of the two endonucleases, Rad1-Rad10 and Rad2, required for dual incision, shows any affinity for ultraviolet-damaged DNA. Rad1-Rad10 forms a ternary complex with the DNA damage recognition protein Rad14, providing a means for targeting this nuclease to the damage site. It has remained unclear how the Rad2 nuclease is targeted to the DNA damage site and why mutations in the human RAD2 counterpart, XPG, result in Cockayne syndrome. Here we examine whether Rad2 is part of a higher order subassembly. Interestingly, we find copurification of Rad2 protein with TFIIH, such that TFIIH purified from a strain that overexpresses Rad2 contains a stoichiometric amount of Rad2. By several independent criteria, we establish that Rad2 is tightly associated with TFIIH, exhibiting an apparent dissociation constant < 3.3 x 10(-9) M. These results identify a novel subassembly consisting of TFIIH and Rad2, which we have designated as nucleotide excision repair factor 3. Association with TFIIH provides a means of targeting Rad2 to the damage site, where its endonuclease activity would mediate the 3' incision. Our findings are important for understanding the manner of assembly of the NER machinery and they have implications for Cockayne syndrome.     

Yeast Tdp1 and Rad1-Rad10 function as redundant pathways for repairing Top1 replicative damage

When a replication fork collides with a DNA topoisomerase I (Top1) cleavage complex, the covalently bound enzyme must be removed from the DNA 3' end before recombination-dependent replication restart. Here we report that the tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase Tdp1 and the structure-specific endonuclease Rad1-Rad10 function as primary alternative pathways of Top1 repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Thus, tdp1 rad1 cells (including the catalytic point mutant rad1-D869A) not only are highly sensitive to the Top1 poison camptothecin but also exhibit a TOP1-dependent growth delay. Extensive genetic analysis revealed that both Tdp1 and Rad1-Rad10 repair proceed through recombination that equally depends on RAD52, RAD51, and RAD50. The Rad1-Rad10 pathway further particularly depends on RAD59 and SRS2 but is independent of other nucleotide excision repair genes. Although this pattern is consistent with Rad1-Rad10 removing Top1 in a manner similar to its removal of nonhomologous tails during gene conversion, these differ in that Top1 removal does not require Msh2-Msh3. Finally, we show that yeast lacking the Rad1-Rad10-related proteins Mus81-Mms4 display a unique pattern of camptothecin sensitivity and suggest a concerted model for the action of these endonucleases.     

Suppression of the DNA repair defects of BRCA2-deficient cells with heterologous protein fusions

The BRCA2 tumor suppressor plays an important role in the repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination, also termed homology-directed repair (HDR). Human BRCA2 is 3,418 aa and is composed of several domains. The central part of the protein contains multiple copies of a motif that binds the Rad51 recombinase (the BRC repeat), and the C terminus contains domains that have structural similarity to domains in the ssDNA-binding protein replication protein A (RPA). To gain insight into the role of BRCA2 in the repair of DNA damage, we fused a single (BRC3, BRC4) or multiple BRC motifs to the large RPA subunit. Expression of any of these protein fusions in Brca2 mutant cells substantially improved HDR while suppressing mutagenic repair. A fusion containing a Rad52 ssDNA-binding domain also was active in HDR. Mutations that reduced ssDNA or Rad51 binding impaired the ability of the fusion proteins to function in HDR. The high level of spontaneous chromosomal aberrations in Brca2 mutant cells was largely suppressed by the BRC-RPA fusion proteins, supporting the notion that the primary role of BRCA2 in maintaining genomic integrity is in HDR, specifically to deliver Rad51 to ssDNA. The fusion proteins also restored Rad51 focus formation and cellular survival in response to DNA damaging agents. Because as little as 2% of BRCA2 fused to RPA is sufficient to suppress cellular defects found in Brca2-mutant mammalian cells, these results provide insight into the recently discovered diversity of BRCA2 domain structures in different organisms.     

DNA annealing by Rad52 Protein is stimulated by specific interaction with the complex of replication protein A and single-stranded DNA

Homologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends critically on RAD52 function. In vitro, Rad52 protein preferentially binds single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), mediates annealing of complementary ssDNA, and stimulates Rad51 protein-mediated DNA strand exchange. Replication protein A (RPA) is a ssDNA-binding protein that is also crucial to the recombination process. Herein we report that Rad52 protein effects the annealing of RPA–ssDNA complexes, complexes that are otherwise unable to anneal. The ability of Rad52 protein to promote annealing depends on both the type of ssDNA substrate and ssDNA binding protein. RPA allows, but slows, Rad52 protein-mediated annealing of oligonucleotides. In contrast, RPA is almost essential for annealing of longer plasmid-sized DNA but has little effect on the annealing of poly(dT) and poly(dA), which are relatively long DNA molecules free of secondary structure. These results suggest that one role of RPA in Rad52 protein-mediated annealing is the elimination of DNA secondary structure. However, neither Escherichia coli ssDNA binding protein nor human RPA can substitute in this reaction, indicating that RPA has a second role in this process, a role that requires specific RPA–Rad52 protein interactions. This idea is confirmed by the finding that RPA, which is complexed with nonhomologous ssDNA, inhibits annealing but the human RPA–ssDNA complex does not. Finally, we present a model for the early steps of the repair of double-strand DNA breaks in yeast.     

Properties of the human Cdc45/Mcm2-7/GINS helicase complex and its action with DNA polymerase epsilon in rolling circle DNA synthesis

In eukaryotes, although the Mcm2-7 complex is a key component of the replicative DNA helicase, its association with Cdc45 and GINS (the CMG complex) is required for the activation of the DNA helicase. Here, we show that the CMG complex is localized to chromatin in human cells and describe the biochemical properties of the human CMG complex purified from baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells. The isolated complex binds to ssDNA regions in the presence of magnesium and ATP (or a nonhydrolyzable ATP analog), contains maximal DNA helicase in the presence of forked DNA structures, and translocates along the leading strand (3' to 5' direction). The complex hydrolyses ATP in the absence of DNA; unwinds duplex regions up to 500 bp; and either replication protein A or Escherichia coli single stranded binding protein increases the efficiency of displacement of long duplex regions. Using a 200-nt primed circular DNA substrate, the combined action of human DNA polymerase ε and the human CMG complex leads to the formation of products >10 kb in length. These findings suggest that the coordinated action of these replication complexes supports leading strand synthesis.     

Escherichia coli RecO protein anneals ssDNA complexed with its cognate ssDNA-binding protein: A common step in genetic recombination

We present biochemical evidence for the functional similarity of Escherichia coli RecO protein and bacteriophage T4 UvsY protein to eukaryotic Rad52 protein. Although Rad52 protein is conserved in eukaryotes, no sequence homologue has been found in prokaryotes or archeabacteria. Rad52 protein has two unique activities: facilitation of replication protein-A (RPA) displacement by Rad51 protein and annealing of RPA-single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) complexes. Both activities require species-specific interaction between Rad52 protein and RPA. Both RecO and UvsY proteins also possess the former property with regard to their cognate ssDNA-binding protein. Here, we report that RecO protein anneals ssDNA that is complexed with only its cognate ssDNA-binding protein, suggesting the involvement of species-specific interactions. Optimal activity for RecO protein occurs after formation of a 1:1 complex with SSB protein. RecR protein, which is known to stimulate RecO protein to facilitate SSB protein displacement by RecA protein, inhibits annealing by RecO protein, suggesting that RecR protein may regulate the choice between the DNA strand invasion versus annealing pathways. In addition, we show that UvsY protein anneals ssDNA; furthermore, ssDNA, which is complexed only with its cognate ssDNA-binding protein, is annealed in the presence of UvsY protein. These results indicate that RecO and possibly UvsY proteins are functional counterparts of Rad52 protein. Based on the conservation of these functions, we propose a modified double-strand break repair model that includes DNA annealing as an important intermediate step.     

Assembly of RecA-like recombinases: Distinct roles for mediator proteins in mitosis and meiosis

Members of the RecA family of recombinases from bacteriophage T4, Escherichia coli, yeast, and higher eukaryotes function in recombination as higher-order oligomers assembled on tracts of single-strand DNA (ssDNA). Biochemical studies have shown that assembly of recombinase involves accessory factors. These studies have identified a class of proteins, called recombination mediator proteins, that act by promoting assembly of recombinase on ssDNA tracts that are bound by ssDNA-binding protein (ssb). In the absence of mediators, ssb inhibits recombination reactions by competing with recombinase for DNA-binding sites. Here we briefly review mediated recombinase assembly and present results of new in vivo experiments. Immuno-double-staining experiments in Saccharomyces cerevisiae suggest that Rad51, the eukaryotic recombinase, can assemble at or near sites containing ssb (replication protein A, RPA) during the response to DNA damage, consistent with a need for mediator activity. Correspondingly, mediator gene mutants display defects in Rad51 assembly after DNA damage and during meiosis, although the requirements for assembly are distinct in the two cases. In meiosis, both Rad52 and Rad55/57 are required, whereas either Rad52 or Rad55/57 is sufficient to promote assembly of Rad51 in irradiated mitotic cells. Rad52 promotes normal amounts of Rad51 assembly in the absence of Rad55 at 30 degrees C but not 20 degrees C, accounting for the cold sensitivity of rad55 null mutants. Finally, we show that assembly of Rad51 is induced by radiation during S phase but not during G(1), consistent with the role of Rad51 in repairing the spontaneous damage that occurs during DNA replication.     

Rapid assembly of the bacteriophage T4 core replication complex on a linear primer/template construct.

DNA synthesis on a primed DNA substrate by bacteriophage T4 requires the assembly of a core replication complex consisting of the T4 DNA polymerase, a single-stranded binding protein (32 protein), and the accessory proteins 44/62 and 45. In this paper, we demonstrate the successful assembly of this core complex on a short linear primer/template system at levels of accessory proteins equivalent to the concentration of primer 3' ends. The key to this assembly is the presence of streptavidin molecules bound at each end of the DNA substrate via biotin moieties incorporated into the template strand. Streptavidin serves to block the ends of the primer/template, thus preventing translocation of the accessory proteins away from the site of assembly and their subsequent dissociation from the ends of the primer/template. Complex assembly on this substrate requires ATP and the presence of both the 44/62 and 45 proteins. The time required for assembly of a full enzyme equivalent of complex in our system is approximately 2 s.     

Requirement of Rad18 protein for replication through DNA lesions in mouse and human cells

In yeast, the Rad6-Rad18 ubiquitin conjugating enzyme plays a critical role in promoting replication although DNA lesions by translesion synthesis (TLS). In striking contrast, a number of studies have indicated that TLS can occur in the absence of Rad18 in human and other mammalian cells, and also in chicken cells. In this study, we determine the role of Rad18 in TLS that occurs during replication in human and mouse cells, and show that in the absence of Rad18, replication of duplex plasmids containing a cis-syn TT dimer or a (6-4) TT photoproduct is severely inhibited in human cells and that mutagenesis resulting from TLS opposite cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and (6-4) photoproducts formed at the TT, TC, and CC dipyrimidine sites in the chromosomal cII gene in UV-irradiated mouse cells is abolished. From these and other observations with Rad18, we conclude that the Rad6-Rad18 enzyme plays an essential role in promoting replication through DNA lesions by TLS in mammalian cells. In contrast, the dispensability of Rad18 for TLS in chicken DT40 cells would suggest that the role of the Rad6-Rad18 enzyme complex has diverged considerably between chicken and mammals, raising the possibility that TLS mechanisms differ among them.     

Single-stranded DNA mimicry in the p53 transactivation domain interaction with replication protein A

One of many protein-protein interactions modulated upon DNA damage is that of the single-stranded DNA-binding protein, replication protein A (RPA), with the p53 tumor suppressor. Here we report the crystal structure of RPA residues 1-120 (RPA70N) bound to the N-terminal transactivation domain of p53 (residues 37-57; p53N) and, by using NMR spectroscopy, characterize two mechanisms by which the RPA/p53 interaction can be modulated. RPA70N forms an oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding fold, similar to that previously observed for the ssDNA-binding domains of RPA. In contrast, the N-terminal p53 transactivation domain is largely disordered in solution, but residues 37-57 fold into two amphipathic helices, H1 and H2, upon binding with RPA70N. The H2 helix of p53 structurally mimics the binding of ssDNA to the oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding fold. NMR experiments confirmed that both ssDNA and an acidic peptide mimicking a phosphorylated form of RPA32N can independently compete the acidic p53N out of the binding site. Taken together, our data suggest a mechanism for DNA damage signaling that can explain a threshold response to DNA damage.     

Initiation sites for discontinuous DNA synthesis of bacteriophage T7

We have previously shown that the discontinuous replication of bacteriophage T7 DNA is primed by tetraribonucleotides (major component) or pentaribonucleotides. Both tetramers and pentamers start with pppA-C and are rich in A and C at the third and fourth nucleotides. In this study, the sites of transition from primer RNA to DNA in vivo have been located on a 340-nucleotide segment of the H strand of the T7 genome by 32P-labeling in vitro of the 5'-hydroxyl ends of DNA resulting from alkaline hydrolysis of RNA-linked T7 DNA fragments. Five strong transition sites were detected with a common sequence 5'-G-A-C-N1-N2-N3-N4-3', in which N1 was either C or A, N2 ws A, C, or G, and either N3 or N4 was the nucleotide for the switchover to DNA synthesis. We conclude that the complementary sequence 3'-C-T-G-G/T-N'2-(N'3)-5' in the template strand is the most frequently used signal for synthesis of primer RNA. Whereas primer-RNA synthesis starts at a precisely defined nucleotide, the transition to DNA synthesis varies within two nucleotides. Because the observed signal sequence would be present on a statistical basis once per 128 nucleotides, only about 10% of the existing signals are used for primer synthesis in each round of replication so that nascent fragments 1000-2000 long result. This provides an unexpected flexibility for RNA priming of DNA synthesis.     

Yeast Rad17/Mec3/Ddc1: a sliding clamp for the DNA damage checkpoint

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad24 and Rad17 checkpoint proteins are part of an early response to DNA damage in a signal transduction pathway leading to cell cycle arrest. Rad24 interacts with the four small subunits of replication factor C (RFC) to form the RFC-Rad24 complex. Rad17 forms a complex with Mec3 and Ddc1 (Rad1731) and shows structural similarities with the replication clamp PCNA. This parallelism with a clamp-clamp loader system that functions in DNA replication has led to the hypothesis that a similar clamp-clamp loader relationship exists for the DNA damage response system. We have purified the putative checkpoint clamp loader RFC-Rad24 and the putative clamp Rad1731 from a yeast overexpression system. Here, we provide experimental evidence that, indeed, the RFC-Rad24 clamp loader loads the Rad1731 clamp around partial duplex DNA in an ATP-dependent process. Furthermore, upon ATP hydrolysis, the Rad1731 clamp is released from the clamp loader and can slide across more than 1 kb of duplex DNA, a process which may be well suited for a search for damage. Rad1731 showed no detectable exonuclease activity.     

A structural gap in Dpo4 supports mutagenic bypass of a major benzo[a]pyrene dG adduct in DNA through template misalignment

Erroneous replication of lesions in DNA by DNA polymerases leads to elevated mutagenesis. To understand the molecular basis of DNA damage-induced mutagenesis, we have determined the x-ray structures of the Y-family polymerase, Dpo4, in complex with a DNA substrate containing a bulky DNA lesion and incoming nucleotides. The DNA lesion is derived from an environmentally widespread carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, benzo[a]pyrene (BP). The potent carcinogen BP is metabolized to diol epoxides that form covalent adducts with cellular DNA. In the present study, the major BP diol epoxide adduct in DNA, BP-N(2)-deoxyguanosine (BP-dG), was placed at a template-primer junction. Three ternary complexes reveal replication blockage, extension past a mismatched lesion, and a -1 frameshift mutation. In the productive structures, the bulky adduct is flipped/looped out of the DNA helix into a structural gap between the little finger and core domains. Sequestering of the hydrophobic BP adduct in this new substrate-binding site permits the DNA to exhibit normal geometry for primer extension. Extrusion of the lesion by template misalignment allows the base 5' to the adduct to serve as the template, resulting in a -1 frameshift. Subsequent strand realignment produces a mismatched base opposite the lesion. These structural observations, in combination with replication and mutagenesis data, suggest a model in which the additional substrate-binding site stabilizes the extrahelical nucleotide for lesion bypass and generation of base substitutions and -1 frameshift mutations.     

Rtt105 promotes high-fidelity DNA replication and repair by regulating the single-stranded DNA-binding factor RPA

Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) covered with the heterotrimeric Replication Protein A (RPA) complex is a central intermediate of DNA replication and repair. How RPA is regulated to ensure the fidelity of DNA replication and repair remains poorly understood. Yeast Rtt105 is an RPA-interacting protein required for RPA nuclear import and efficient ssDNA binding. Here, we describe an important role of Rtt105 in high-fidelity DNA replication and recombination and demonstrate that these functions of Rtt105 primarily depend on its regulation of RPA. The deletion of RTT105 causes elevated spontaneous DNA mutations with large duplications or deletions mediated by microhomologies. Rtt105 is recruited to DNA double-stranded break (DSB) ends where it promotes RPA assembly and homologous recombination repair by gene conversion or break-induced replication. In contrast, Rtt105 attenuates DSB repair by the mutagenic single-strand annealing or alternative end joining pathway. Thus, Rtt105-mediated regulation of RPA promotes high-fidelity replication and recombination while suppressing repair by deleterious pathways. Finally, we show that the human RPA-interacting protein hRIP-α, a putative functional homolog of Rtt105, also stimulates RPA assembly on ssDNA, suggesting the conservation of an Rtt105-mediated mechanism.

Faithful DNA replication and repair are essential for the maintenance of genetic material (1). Even minor defects in replication or repair can cause high loads of mutations, genome instability, cancer, and other diseases (1). Deficiency in different DNA repair or replication proteins can lead to distinct mutation patterns (2–4). For example, deficiency in mismatch repair results in increased microsatellite instability, while deficiency in homologous recombination repair is often associated with tandem duplications or deletions (3–7). Sequence analysis of various cancer types has identified many distinct genome rearrangement and mutation signatures (8). However, the genetic basis for some of these signatures remains poorly understood, thus requiring further investigation in experimental models (8).In eukaryotic cells, Replication Protein A (RPA), the major single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding protein complex, is essential for DNA replication, repair, and recombination (9–13). It is also crucial for the suppression of mutations and genome instability (14–17). RPA acts as a key scaffold to recruit and coordinate proteins involved in different DNA metabolic processes (14, 15, 17). As the first responder of ssDNA, RPA participates in both replication initiation and elongation (10, 12, 13). During replication or under replication stresses, the exposed ssDNA must be protected and stabilized by RPA to prevent formation of secondary structures (14, 16). RPA is also essential for DNA double-stranded break (DSB) repair by the homologous recombination (HR) pathway (18–21). During HR, the 5′-terminated strands of DSBs are initially processed by the resection machinery, generating 3′-tailed ssDNA (22). The 3′-ssDNA becomes bound by the RPA complex to activate the DNA damage checkpoint (23). RPA is subsequently replaced by the Rad51 recombinase to form a Rad51 nucleoprotein filament (19, 24). This recombinase filament catalyzes invasion of the 3′-strands at the homologous sequence to form the D-loop structure, followed by repair DNA synthesis and resolution of recombination intermediates (18, 19, 24). During HR, RPA prevents the formation of DNA secondary structures and protects 3′-ssDNA from nucleolytic degradation (25). In addition, recent work implies a role of RPA in homology recognition (26).RPA is composed of three subunits, Rfa1, Rfa2, and Rfa3, and with a total of six oligonucleotide-binding (OB) motifs that mediate interactions with ssDNA or proteins (14, 17, 27). RPA can associate with ssDNA in different modes (28). It binds short DNA (8 to 10 nt) in an unstable mode and longer ssDNA (28 to 30 nt) in a high-affinity mode (28–31). Recent single-molecule studies revealed that RPA binding on ssDNA is highly dynamic (28, 32). It can rapidly diffuse within the bound DNA ligand and quickly exchange between the free and ssDNA-bound states (32–35). The cellular functions of RPA rely on its high ssDNA-binding affinity and its ability to interact with different proteins (28). Although RPA has a high affinity for ssDNA, recent studies have suggested that the binding of RPA on chromatin requires additional regulations (36). How RPA is regulated to ensure replication and repair fidelity remains poorly understood.Rtt105, a protein initially identified as a regulator of the Ty1 retrotransposon, has recently been shown to interact with RPA and acts as an RPA chaperone (36). It facilitates the nuclear localization of RPA and stimulates the loading of RPA at replication forks in unperturbed conditions or under replication stresses (36). Rtt105 exhibits synthetic genetic interactions with genes encoding replisome proteins and is required for heterochromatin silencing and telomere maintenance (37). The deletion of RTT105 results in increased gross chromosomal rearrangements and reduced resistance to DNA-damaging agents (36, 38). In vitro, Rtt105 can directly stimulate RPA binding to ssDNA, likely by changing the binding mode of RPA (36).In this study, by using a combination of genetic, biochemical, and single-molecule approaches, we demonstrate that Rtt105-dependent regulation of RPA promotes high-fidelity genome duplication and recombination while suppressing mutations and the low-fidelity repair pathways. We provide evidence that human hRIP-α, the putative functional homolog of yeast Rtt105, could regulate human RPA assembly on ssDNA in vitro. Our study unveils a layer of regulation on the maintenance of genome integrity that relies on dynamic RPA binding on ssDNA to ensure high-fidelity replication or recombination.     

Human HELB is a processive motor protein that catalyzes RPA clearance from single-stranded DNA

Human DNA helicase B (HELB) is a poorly characterized helicase suggested to play both positive and negative regulatory roles in DNA replication and recombination. In this work, we used bulk and single-molecule approaches to characterize the biochemical activities of HELB protein with a particular focus on its interactions with Replication Protein A (RPA) and RPA–single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) filaments. HELB is a monomeric protein that binds tightly to ssDNA with a site size of ∼20 nucleotides. It couples ATP hydrolysis to translocation along ssDNA in the 5′ to 3′ direction accompanied by the formation of DNA loops. HELB also displays classical helicase activity, but this is very weak in the absence of an assisting force. HELB binds specifically to human RPA, which enhances its ATPase and ssDNA translocase activities but inhibits DNA unwinding. Direct observation of HELB on RPA nucleoprotein filaments shows that translocating HELB concomitantly clears RPA from ssDNA. This activity, which can allow other proteins access to ssDNA intermediates despite their shielding by RPA, may underpin the diverse roles of HELB in cellular DNA transactions.

The human HELB protein was first identified as a homolog of a putative murine replicative helicase (1–3). Since then, various functions have been assigned to the protein, including a role in the onset of chromosomal DNA replication (2), cellular recovery from replication stress (4), promotion of Cdc45 chromatin binding (5), resolution of DNA secondary CGG nucleotides repeat structures (6), and stimulation of RAD51-mediated 5′–3′ heteroduplex extension to promote homologous recombination (HR) (7). Most recently and in apparent contradiction to the role in the stimulation of HR, HELB was proposed to inhibit homology-dependent double-stranded DNA break (DSB) repair by antagonizing the processive resection nucleases EXO1 and DNA2/BLM during the G0/G1 phases of the cell cycle (8). In agreement with this idea, HELB forms nuclear foci in response to DNA damage and is phosphorylated by cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK), causing localization to the nucleus in G1 and to the cytoplasm during S/G2. The formation of HELB damage foci is dependent on the main eukaryotic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding protein Replication Protein A (RPA) (9), which has been shown to interact physically with HELB (4, 8). Although the interaction with RPA is potentially critical for all putative functions of HELB, the ability of this motor protein to modulate the formation, remodeling, or removal of RPA nucleoprotein filaments has never been studied and is the focus of the work presented here.The filaments formed between RPA and ssDNA are critical intermediates in DNA replication, recombination, and repair (10–12). RPA not only shields ssDNA from nucleolytic degradation, but it is also involved in the recruitment or exclusion of other factors from ssDNA, the regulation of DNA replication and repair, and the initiation of cell signaling cues that link these pathways to the cell cycle and its progression through checkpoints (13). Interestingly, many helicases and helicase-like proteins share intimate physical and functional interactions with ssDNA binding proteins (14, 15). However, we do not currently understand how the activity of HELB affects RPA filaments and vice versa.HELB is a 120-kDa protein comprising three distinct domains: an N-terminal region of unknown function, a central helicase domain sharing homology with the Superfamily 1 (SF1) helicase RecD, and a C-terminal region containing CDK phosphorylation sites (3) (Fig. 1A). Site-directed mutagenesis has implicated the central helicase domain in both the DNA and RPA binding activities of HELB (Fig. 1A, blue arrows). Interestingly, mutations in HELB are associated with both female infertility and early-onset menopause and are found widely distributed in the protein sequence in human tumor samples (Fig. 1A, red arrows) (16, 17). In vitro studies show that HELB possesses ssDNA-dependent ATPase activity and 5′ to 3′ helicase activity, which is as expected based on the similarity to RecD (2, 18). However, precisely how these biochemical properties underpin the cellular function(s) of HELB and the significance of the interaction with RPA are unresolved.Open in a separate windowFig. 1.HELB is a monomer that binds tightly to ssDNA and displays ssDNA-dependent ATPase activity. (A) Cartoon of HELB showing overall domain layout and important mutations. Red marks denote positions of high-frequency tumor mutations. Blue marks denote positions of mutations that affect ATPase, DNA binding, and RPA binding activities. (B) Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis shows highly purified recombinant human HELB produced from insect cells. (C) SEC-MALS analysis demonstrates that HELB is a monomer in solution under these conditions with a calculated molecular mass (red data line) of 123,252 Da. (D, left axis) HELB binding constants (K_d) for poly(dT) substrates of different lengths obtained in PIFE assays described in SI Appendix, Fig. S1A. An exponential fit determines a saturating K_d of 5 nM. (D, right axis) Stoichiometry values obtained under tight binding conditions as shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S1 B–E. (E) Michaelis–Menten plot of ATP hydrolysis gives K_m and k_cat parameters for WT HELB and also shows that the K481A mutant is unable to hydrolyze ATP. (F) Analysis of DNA stimulation of HELB ATPase activity demonstrates that HELB is an ssDNA-dependent helicase. ATP turnover is stimulated more by polythymidine substrates than mixed base sequences, likely due to their inability to form inhibitory secondary structures. A.U., arbitrary units; mw, molecular weight.In this study, we used bulk and single-molecule assays to further characterize HELB, including its physical and functional interactions with RPA and RPA nucleoprotein filaments. Paradoxically, we find that human RPA (itself a potent ssDNA binding protein) is stimulatory to all activities of HELB on ssDNA, despite the competition one would expect between the two proteins for their nucleic acid substrates. In contrast, noncognate RPA protein inhibits all activities of human HELB. These highly specific interactions with RPA filaments help to recruit HELB onto ssDNA that is devoid of secondary structure and promote efficient ssDNA translocation coupled to the processive clearance of RPA. The implications of this finding for the roles of HELB in DNA replication and recombination are discussed.     

Prereplicative repair of oxidized bases in the human genome is mediated by NEIL1 DNA glycosylase together with replication proteins

Base oxidation by endogenous and environmentally induced reactive oxygen species preferentially occurs in replicating single-stranded templates in mammalian genomes, warranting prereplicative repair of the mutagenic base lesions. It is not clear how such lesions (which, unlike bulky adducts, do not block replication) are recognized for repair. Furthermore, strand breaks caused by base excision from ssDNA by DNA glycosylases, including Nei-like (NEIL) 1, would generate double-strand breaks during replication, which are not experimentally observed. NEIL1, whose deficiency causes a mutator phenotype and is activated during the S phase, is present in the DNA replication complex isolated from human cells, with enhanced association with DNA in S-phase cells and colocalization with replication foci containing DNA replication proteins. Furthermore, NEIL1 binds to 5-hydroxyuracil, the oxidative deamination product of C, in replication protein A-coated ssDNA template and inhibits DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase δ. We postulate that, upon encountering an oxidized base during replication, NEIL1 initiates prereplicative repair by acting as a “cowcatcher” and preventing nascent chain growth. Regression of the stalled replication fork, possibly mediated by annealing helicases, then allows lesion repair in the reannealed duplex. This model is supported by our observations that NEIL1, whose deficiency slows nascent chain growth in oxidatively stressed cells, is stimulated by replication proteins in vitro. Furthermore, deficiency of the closely related NEIL2 alone does not affect chain elongation, but combined NEIL1/2 deficiency further inhibits DNA replication. These results support a mechanism of NEIL1-mediated prereplicative repair of oxidized bases in the replicating strand, with NEIL2 providing a backup function.Several dozen oxidatively modified, and mostly mutagenic, bases are induced in the genomes of aerobic organisms by endogenous and environmentally induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) (1, 2). For example, 5-hydroxyuracil (5-OHU), a predominant lesion generated by oxidative deamination of C, is mutagenic because of its mispairing with A (3). The bases in the single-stranded (ss) replicating DNA template are particularly prone to oxidation (4); the lack of their repair before replication could fix the mutations. The bulky base adducts if formed in the template strand would block replication and trigger DNA damage-response signaling. In contrast, oxidized bases with minor modifications, which are continuously formed in much higher abundance than the bulky adducts, would mostly allow replication. This raises the question of how these bases are marked for repair before replication to avoid mutagenic consequences. Oxidized base repair in mammalian genomes occurs primarily via the base excision repair (BER) pathway which is initiated with lesion base excision mediated by one of five major DNA glycosylases belonging to the Nth or Nei families, with distinct structural features and reaction mechanisms (1). Nei-like (NEIL) 1 and NEIL2 DNA glycosylases (5, 6) of the Nei family (which also contains the less characterized NEIL3; ref. 7) are distinct from NTH1 and OGG1 of the Nth family because the NEILs can excise damaged bases from ssDNA substrates (8). Furthermore, NEIL1 is activated during the S phase (5). Our earlier studies also showed that NEIL1 functionally interacts with many DNA replication proteins including sliding clamp proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), flap endonuclease 1 (FEN-1), and Werner RecQ helicase (WRN) via its disordered C-terminal segment (9–12). Importantly, mammalian ssDNA-binding replication protein A (RPA), essential for DNA replication and most other DNA transactions, inhibits NEIL1 or NEIL2 activity with primer-template DNA substrates mimicking the replication fork, presumably to prevent double-strand break formation (13). Although they collectively implicate NEIL1 in the repair of replicating DNA, those observations did not provide direct evidence for NEIL1’s role in prereplicative repair, nor did they address whether NEIL1 is unique for this function. In this report, we document that NEIL1 binds to the lesion base in an RPA-coated ssDNA template in vitro, without excising the lesion and cleaving the DNA strand, and blocks primer elongation by the replicative DNA polymerase δ (Polδ). This strongly suggests that the replication complex at the lesion site is stalled in vivo in the presence of NEIL1, which provides the signal for repair of lesions in the template strand before replication.