Intersubject responsiveness of high-affinity growth hormone (GH)-binding protein (GHBP) to long-term GH replacement therapy

In adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD) syndrome responsiveness to GH replacement therapy is reported to vary considerably. The underlying mechanisms, however, are not well understood. The aim of this study was to investigate which baseline variables determine the reported variable intersubject responsiveness of high-affinity GH-binding protein (GHBP) to GH replacement therapy. In the setting of a double blind study over 12 months with placebo control over the first 6 months, we analyzed the interrelationship between a number of baseline variables, which vary considerably amongst subjects, and the GHBP response to GH replacement in 31 GHD adults (21 males and 10 females). The following variables were investigated: age, gender, duration of GHD, body composition, serum levels of high-affinity GHBP, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3). The results showed that in the 6 months treated group of 16 patients (11 males, 5 females), serum IGF-1 increased from 87 ng/ml (range: 26 to 173) to 250 (range: 62 to 467) (p<0.01) and GHBP increased from 1,302 pmol/l (range: 845 to 1,m960) to 1418 (range: 941 to 2,025) (p=0.04). Both parameters showed a significant time effect (within-subjects) (p<0.001). In the 12 months treated group of 15 patients (10 males, 5 females), serum IGF-1 increased from 92 ng/ml (range: 20 to 180) to 272 (range: 45 to 491) (p<0.01), whereas GHBP did not show a significant change: from 1,186 pmol/l (range: 660 to 1,690) to 1,252 (range: 580 to 1,890) (p=0.87). Also no significant time effect (within-subjects) was observed for GHBP (p=0.06). Step-wise multiple regression analyses revealed that during the 6 months placebo period baseline GHBP explained 83% of the variance in post-placebo GHBP, whereas the variance in post-treatment GHBP could be accurately predicted (adjusted R2=0.93) from baseline GHBP and body fat mass, irrespective of the duration of GH treatment. No other baseline variables contributed independently to the GHBP response, with the exception of IGFBP-3, which showed a small, but significant contribution in females, but not in males. These findings indicate that the variable intersubject responsiveness of GHBP to GH replacement therapy is mainly due to differences in baseline body fat mass amongst adult GHD patients, and that in female patients a relatively low baseline IGFBP-3 contributes to a rise in serum GHBP after GH treatment. The clinical relevance of measuring GHBP in adult GHD patients is limited to the first screening step to diagnose GHD, because long-term GH therapy tends to restore serum GHBP to pretreatment levels.     

Safety and efficacy of growth hormone (GH) during extended treatment of adult Japanese patients with GH deficiency (GHD)

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of a growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy using a GH dose regimen based on serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) concentrations in Japanese adults with GH deficiency (GHD). DESIGN: In this multicentre, uncontrolled, open-label study, Japanese adults with GHD who had received either GH replacement therapy (GH-GH group, n=35) or placebo (Placebo-GH group, n=36) in a previous randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial were treated with GH replacement therapy for 48 weeks. GH treatment was started at a dose of 0.003 mg/kg/day administered by subcutaneous injection for the first 8 weeks, after which the dose was adjusted to maintain patients' serum IGF-I levels within the reference range adjusted for age and gender. Body composition, serum lipids, serum IGF-I and IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) levels were measured throughout study. Symptom and quality of life scores were also determined. RESULTS: Lean body mass (LBM) was increased compared with baseline (the end of the preceding double-blind trial) at 24 and 48 weeks, with a mean (+/-SD) increase of 1.3% (+/-4.2%) at week 48 in the GH-GH group (an increase of 6.6% [+/-6.0%] from the start of the preceding double-blind trial) and a larger increase of 4.7% (+/-5.9%) in the Placebo-GH group. Body fat mass (BFM) increased slightly from baseline in the GH-GH group with a mean increase of 2.9+/-10.6% at week 48 (a decrease from the start of the preceding double-blind trial at 48 weeks of 7.8% [+/-15.0%]) but decreased by 6.5% (+/-11.7%) at week 48 in the Placebo-GH group. Serum lipids were unchanged or slightly increased from baseline in the GH-GH group but patients' lipid profiles improved in the Placebo-GH group. In patients who received placebo during the double-blind study, individualised GH therapy in this open-label study increased mean LBM at 48 weeks by 6.2+/-6.8% in patients with CO GHD and by 3.0+/-4.4% in patients with AO GHD. Changes in mean LBM and mean BFM at week 48 were +4.1+/-4.5% and -2.4+/-10.5%, respectively, in females and +5.0+/-6.7% and -8.9+/-11.8%, respectively, in males. In patients who received GH treatment during the double-blind study, overall changes in LBM, BFM and IGF-I SD score after 24 weeks and 48 weeks were small, with no significant differences between subgroups. While the overall incidence of adverse events was broadly similar in the GH-GH and Placebo-GH groups (97% and 89%, respectively), the incidence of treatment-related events was higher in the GH-GH group (83% vs 42% in the Placebo-GH group). Most adverse events in both treatment groups were of mild or moderate severity and not clinically significant. The incidences of oedema and cases of high IGF-I during the IGF-I level-adjusted treatment regimen were lower than those during the preceding fixed dose titration. CONCLUSION: Long-term GH replacement therapy was well tolerated in Japanese adults with GHD. GH treatment maintained the improvements in body composition and lipid profiles in the patients previously treated in the double-blind study (GH-GH group) and improved these parameters in previously untreated patients (Placebo-GH group). Individualised GH administration based on IGF-I levels was well-tolerated and effective.     

Growth hormone binding protein correlates strongly with leptin and percentage body fat in GH-deficient adults, is increased by GH replacement but does not predict IGF-I response.

GH-binding protein (GHBP) corresponds to the extracellular domain of the GH receptor (GHR) and has been shown to be closely related to body fat. This study aimed to examine the inter-relationship between GHBP, leptin and body fat, and to test the hypothesis that GHBP is modified by GH replacement in GH-deficient adults and predicts IGF-I response. Twenty adults, mean age 47 years (range 20-69) with proven GH deficiency were randomly allocated to either GH (up to 0.25 U/kg/week in daily doses) or placebo for 3 months before cross-over to the opposite treatment. Plasma GHBP and leptin were measured at baseline and 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after each treatment. Whole body composition was measured at baseline by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). There was a strong correlation between baseline leptin and GHBP (r = 0.88, P < 0.0001) and between baseline GHBP and percentage body fat, (r = 0.83, P < 0.0001). Mean GHBP levels were higher on GH compared with placebo, 1.53 +/- 0.28 vs 1.41 +/- 0.25nM, P = 0.049. There was no correlation between baseline IGF-I and GHBP (r = -0.049, P = 0.84), and GHBP did not predict IGF-I response to GH replacement. The close inter-relationship between GHBP, leptin and body fat suggests a possible role for GHBP in the regulation of body composition. GHBP is increased by GH replacement in GH-deficient adults, but does not predict biochemical response to GH replacement.     

Efficacy and safety of growth hormone (GH) in the treatment of adult Japanese patients with GH deficiency: a randomised, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy on lean body mass (LBM) and other variables including body fat mass, serum lipids and quality of life measures in GH-deficient Japanese adults. DESIGN: This was a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. Following initial screening, patients were randomly assigned to GH treatment (n=37) or placebo (n=36). GH treatment was started at an initial dose 0.003 mg/kg/day s.c. each day for the first 4 weeks after which the dose was increased to 0.006 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks and then to 0.012 mg/kg/day for the last 16 weeks (n=37). Body composition, serum lipids, serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels were measured during the 24-week study. Short Form-36 and Quality of Life Assessment of GH Deficiency in Adults scores were also determined. RESULTS: LBM was significantly increased from baseline at 24 weeks in GH-treated patients, with a mean (+/-SD) increase of 4.7% (+/-5.3%) compared with an increase of 1.0% (+/-4.4%) in the placebo group (p<0.0001 versus baseline, p=0.0003 versus placebo). Percentage body fat decreased significantly from baseline in GH-treated patients (9.3%, p<0.0001), compared with a non-significant 0.2% increase in the placebo group (p<0.0004 for difference between treatment groups). In addition, significantly increased serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels and improvements in the patients' serum lipid profiles were observed in patients who received GH therapy. Changes in quality of life measures did not differ between treatments, probably because of the small number of patients studied. GH therapy was well tolerated, with adverse events of any cause reported in 86.5% of the GH treatment group and 83.3% of the placebo group. CONCLUSION: GH treatment significantly improved body composition and serum lipid profiles in adult Japanese patients with GH deficiency compared with placebo and had no clinically relevant adverse effects.     

The study of spontaneous GH secretion after 36-h fasting distinguishes between GH-deficient and normal adults

OBJECTIVE: Within an appropriate clinical context, GH deficiency (GHD) in adults can only be diagnosed biochemically by provocative testing. The evaluation of IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and even of spontaneous GH secretion do not establish the diagnosis of adult GHD. In fact, remarkable overlaps between normal and GHD adults have been reported for all these parameters. On the other hand, it is well known that even short-term fasting stimulates GH secretion in normal subjects. The aim of our study was to determine the effects of 36 h fasting on 8-h diurnal GH, insulin and glucose levels as well as on basal IGF-I, IGFBP-3, acid-labile subunit (ALS), IGFBP-1, GHBP and free fatty acid (FFA) levels. SUBJECTS: We studied 9 GHD adults (GHD, 8 males, 1 female; age, mean +/- SEM: 37.6 +/- 2.3 years, body mass index (BMI): 24.5 +/- 1.0 kg/m2) and 20 age-matched normal subjects (NS) as controls (13 males, 7 females; age: 28.9 +/- 0.6 years, BMI: 21.6 +/- 0.4 kg/m2). STUDY DESIGN: In all subjects we studied the effects of 36 h fasting on 8-h daytime GH, insulin and glucose levels (assay every 30 min from 0800 h to 1600 h) as well as on basal IGF-I, IGFBP-3, ALS, IGFBP-1, GHBP and FFA levels. RESULTS: Before fasting, basal mean IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and ALS levels in GHD were lower (P < 0. 0001) than in NS. IGFBP-1, GHBP and FFA levels were similar in both groups. Before fasting mean GH concentration (mGHc) in GHD was lower (P < 0.05) than in NS (0.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.6 mu/l) but with a clear overlap between the 2 groups (range 0.4-0.8 vs. 0.4-6.8 mu/l). After fasting, both in GHD and NS basal IGF-I, IGFBP-3, ALS and GHBP levels did not change significantly. On the other hand, in both GHD and in NS IGFBP-1 was increased (P < 0.0001) to a similar extent, while FFA increased in NS more (P < 0.01) than in GHD. Fasting significantly increased mGHc in NS (12.0 +/- 1.2 mu/l, P < 0.0001) but not in GHD (0.6 +/- 0.2 mu/l). After fasting, no overlap was present between GHD and NS (0.4-1.6 vs. 2.4-20.8 mu/l, respectively). Mean glucose and insulin concentrations over 8 h in GHD and NS in basal conditions were similar and were reduced to the same extent in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that after short-term fasting, the study of spontaneous GH secretion distinguishes between GH-deficient adults and normal subjects; this phenomenon occurs before significant changes in IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels. These results suggest that the assessment of spontaneous GH secretion could be useful for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency only after short-term fasting.     

Growth hormone (GH) substitution for one year normalizes elevated GH-binding protein levels in GH-deficient adults secondary to a reduction in body fat. A placebo-controlled trial.

The high affinity growth hormone binding protein (GHBP) in human serum derives from the extracellular domain of the GH receptor. It is well known that fat mass correlates positively to GHBP levels, but it is uncertain whether GH secretory status influences GHBP levels. Since body composition is known to change during GH substitution in adult GHD patients, we determined the relation between GHBP and body composition during GH substitution in GHD adults. Twenty-five GHD adults aged 45.0 +/- 1.8 years, were examined before and after 12 months of placebo-controlled GH substitution (2 IU/m2) in a parallel design. A group of 27 healthy age- and gender-matched normal-weight adults provided reference data. The participants underwent anthropometric measurements [body mass index (BMI), waist/hip ratio (W/H)], computer-tomography (CT-scan) of femoral and abdominal regions, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA-scan), and bioimpedance (BIA), as well as blood sampling. At baseline, the GHBP levels were increased compared to controls (1.63 +/- 0.14 nmol/l vs 1.12 +/- 0.1 nmol/l, P = 0.01). During 12 months of GH substitution, GHBP levels decreased to the levels of the control subjects. GHBP correlated positively to indices of adiposity in GHD patients at baseline: intra-abdominal fat (r = 0.54, P = 0.005), subcutaneous abdominal fat (r = 0.59, P < 0.002), body fat (BIA) (r= 0.41, P= 0.044), BMI (r= 0.58, P = 0.002), and total body fat (DEXA scan) (r= 0.61, P < 0.001). After 12 months of GH substitution, different estimates of body fat were significantly decreased in the GH treated group, but the positive relationship between GHBP and these estimates of body fat was maintained. In multiple linear regression analyses, fasting insulin levels were also a significant determinant of GHBP levels. We conclude that GHBP levels are increased in GHD patients and decrease to normal levels during 12 months of GH substitution. Furthermore, GHBP is predominantly correlated to indices of adiposity also in GHD patients.     

Systemic ghrelin levels in subjects with growth hormone deficiency are not modified by one year of growth hormone replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin stimulates growth hormone (GH) secretion both in vivo and in vitro. Ghrelin is mainly produced in and released from the stomach but it is probably also produced in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus. Whether pituitary GH release is under the control of ghrelin from the stomach and/or from the arcuate nucleus is not known. Moreover, no data on the feedback of GH on systemic ghrelin concentrations are available. It has recently been suggested that ghrelin may induce obesity. DESIGN: In this study, we addressed the following two questions: a) are circulating ghrelin levels increased in human GH deficiency (GHD), and b) does GH treatment modify ghrelin levels in human GHD? METHODS: The study group consisted of 23 patients with GHD. Eighteen had developed adult-onset GHD and five had developed GHD in their childhood (childhood-onset GHD). Ghrelin was measured with a commercially available radioimmunoassay. All measurements were performed twice, first at baseline, before the start of GH replacement therapy, and then again after one year of therapy. GH doses were adjusted every 3 months, targeting serum total IGF-I levels within the normal gender- and age-related reference values for the healthy population. Maintenance doses were continued once the target serum total IGF-I levels were reached. RESULTS: The sum of skinfolds and body water increased significantly, body fat mass and percentage body fat decreased significantly and body mass index and waist-hip ratio were not significantly changed by one year of GH replacement therapy.Before the start of GH replacement therapy, mean value and range for fasting ghrelin in the studied GHD subjects tended to be lower in comparison with healthy subjects in the control group although the difference did not reach significance (GHD ghrelin mean 67.8 pmol/l, range 37.6-116.3 pmol/l; control mean 83.8 pmol/l, range 35.4-132 pmol/l; P=0.11).One year of GH replacement therapy did not modify circulating ghrelin levels (ghrelin before GH therapy: 67.8 pmol/l, range 37.6-116.3 pmol/l; after GH therapy: 65.3 pmol/l, range 35.8-112.6; P=0.56). CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe elevated ghrelin levels in adult GHD subjects and GH replacement therapy did not modify circulating ghrelin levels, despite significant decreases in body fat mass and percentage body fat. It is conceivable that the lack of ghrelin modifications after long-term GH therapy was due to the reduction of adiposity and insulin on one hand, and increased GH secretion on the other. However, it is still possible that systemic ghrelin is involved in the development of obesity, both in normal and GHD subjects.     

Amino acid profiles in adults with growth hormone (GH) deficiency before and during GH replacement therapy

ObjectiveGH replacement to growth hormone deficient (GHD) adults improves body composition. In a subset however, lean body mass (LBM) fails to increase despite normalization of IGF-I and amino acid availability could be of importance. We analyzed amino acid (AA) profiles in plasma and erythrocytes (RBC) and associations with LBM, serum IGF-I and IGFBP-1 before and during GH replacement.Design and methodsExaminations were performed in 15 GHD patients (six women), aged 34–61 yrs before and after 12 months of GH therapy and in a control group of 20 healthy males aged 31–68 yrs. LBM was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), free AAs in plasma and RBC by high performance liquid chromatography and serum IGF-I and IGFBP-1 by in-house RIAs.SettingTertiary care referral centre.ResultsAt baseline, female GHD patients tended to have lower concentrations of the essential branched – chain AAs isoleucine and leucine, total essential AAs, and of the non-essential AA glutamine than the male patients. Male GHD patients tended to have higher plasma and RBC glutamate than controls. At 12 months, IGF-I had normalized in all but one patient and mean LBM gain was 1.9 ± 0.4 kg. AA levels were unchanged. The change in LBM at 12 months was positively correlated to the ratio between the sum of isoleucine, leucine and valine and baseline LBM kg/m² (r = 0.76, p = 0.001, n = 15).ConclusionOur results suggest that the essential branched-chain amino acids in plasma are important for the LBM response to GH substitution. Our finding has to be confirmed in larger groups of GHD adults before making a proper selection of AAs to be measured in plasma and added as dietary supplement during GH therapy. GH administration did not change AA levels and measurements are not useful for monitoring of GH therapy at the time being.     

Body composition and circulating levels of insulin, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 and growth hormone (GH)-binding protein affect the pharmacokinetics of GH in adults independently of age

The aim of our study was to scrutinize the association among age, body composition, and GH status in healthy adults. Using two-step, primed constant infusions of GH during suppression of endogenous GH secretion with octreotide in a group of 26 healthy nonobese men [mean age, 37.3 yr (range, 22-55 yr); body mass index, 24.6 +/- 0.4 kg/m(-2)] we investigated the contributions of age, body composition, insulin, and binding proteins to the variability in the pharmacokinetics and acute actions of GH. All subjects were investigated twice, with the infusion rates of GH calculated according to either total body weight or intraabdominal fat mass. Body composition was determined using computed tomography and bioimpedance measurements. There was no correlation between age and body weight, yet strong positive correlations were observed between age and intraabdominal fat area (r = 0.78; P < 0.0001) and waist to hip ratio (r = 0.71; P < 0.0001) and to a lesser degree to sc fat area (r = 0.42; P < 0.03). The between-subject variability in steady state GH levels was significantly larger when GH was administered per cm(2) intraabdominal fat area than per kg BW (P < 0.001). During primed constant infusions of GH at rates of 1.5 and 3.0 microg/kg x h, the corresponding MCRs of GH were 148.8 +/- 5.4 and 89.8 +/- 2.4 ml/min x m(-2), respectively, and the MCRs were inversely related to the achieved steady state GH levels (P < 0.0001). The MCR was unrelated to age, but was negatively correlated to baseline concentrations of IGF-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1; r = -0.53, P < 0.01) and positively correlated to basal levels of insulin (r = 0.46; P < 0.05), GH-binding protein (GHBP; r = 0.52; P < 0.01), IGFBP-3 (r = 0.47; P < 0.05), and total body fat (r = 0.44; P < 0.05). GH infusion caused significant changes in the concentrations of IGF-I, free fatty acids, GHBP, IGFBP-1, and insulin, but none of these effects was correlated to age. Based on our results we conclude that 1) the clearance of GH is concentration dependent; 2) the pharmacokinetics and acute effects of GH are not affected by age per se; and 3) basal levels of insulin, IGFBP-1, and GHBP as well as age-related changes in body composition are important predictors of GH pharmacokinetics.     

12-Month effects of once-weekly sustained-release growth hormone treatment in adults with GH deficiency

The weekly sustained-release recombinant human GH formulation LB03002, showed beneficial effects in GH-deficient (GHD) adults in a previous 26-week double-blind study. Prior studies of long-acting GH preparations in adults have only been conducted for 6 or 8 months, so the effects of longer-term use are unknown; this is important to address, as replacement is given for many years in GHD adults. This open-label, 26-week study extension evaluated longer-term safety and efficacy of LB03002 over 52 weeks in adults with GHD who had previously been randomized to GH, and provides additional safety and efficacy data over 26 weeks in the cohort who had previously been randomized to placebo. Of 147 adults with GHD who completed a preceding study, 136 patients continued in this open-label study to receive LB03002 over an additional 26 weeks. This represented a continuation of long-acting GH for 26 weeks in the cohort who took this medication in the prior study (LB03002 Throughout group), and describes the first use of long-acting GH in the cohort that was randomized to placebo in the prior study (Switched to LB03002 group). The LB03002 dose was adjusted according to serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels. LB03002 treatment demonstrated mean significant decreases from baseline in fat mass (FM) for both 26 (Switched group, P = 0.001) and 52 weeks (Throughout group, P = 0.002) of 1.11 (1.95) kg and 1.06 (3.16) kg, respectively. Prolonged GH treatment was effective in sustaining the increase in lean body mass (LBM), serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels achieved during the first 26 weeks. Long-term treatment with the sustained-release weekly GH preparation over both 26 and 52 weeks in adults with GHD demonstrated a sustained reduction of FM with a favorable safety profile. This study extends prior knowledge about long-acting GH because it reports the most prolonged treatment of adults with any long-acting GH preparation, thereby confirming the value and safety of such agents for long-term GH replacement.     

A low individualized GH dose in young patients with childhood onset GH deficiency normalized serum IGF-I without significant deterioration in glucose tolerance

OBJECTIVE: Many GH deficient (GHD) patients have impaired glucose tolerance and GH substitution in these patients has caused deleterious effects on glucose tolerance with hyperinsulinaemia. This further impairment of glucose tolerance might be due to an unphysiologically high dose of GH. Whether such a deterioration can be avoided by an optimal GH replacement dose is not known. In most previous studies, the GH dose was calculated according to body weight or body surface area and not adjusted according to the serum IGF-I response. DESIGN: The study was of open design and investigations were performed before the start of GH substitution and after nine months of treatment. The GH dose was adjusted according to the response in serum IGF-I, and in patients with sub-normal serum IGF-I levels (all but two) we aimed for a serum IGF-I level in the middle of the normal range. The median GH dose at the end of the study was 0.14 IU/kg/week. PATIENTS: Ten patients, eight males and two females, with childhood onset GHD were examined. Their median age was 27 years (range 21-28). MEASUREMENTS: Overnight and 24-h fasting levels of glucose, insulin and IGFBP-1 were measured. Directly after the 24-h fast an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), with measurements of glucose, insulin and IGFBP-1 was performed. An intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) was performed after overnight fasting. Body composition was measured with bio-impedance analysis (BIA) and quality of life was assessed using a self-rating questionnaire, Qol-AGHDA. RESULTS: After GH treatment, there were no significant changes in glucose tolerance, measured by overnight and 24-h fasting levels of glucose, insulin and IGFBP-1, an oral glucose tolerance test (after 24-h fasting) and an intravenous glucose tolerance test (after overnight fasting). Percentage fat mass and BMI correlated negatively with both the 24 h fasting IGFBP-1 levels and the IGFBP-1 responses after the OGTT. All patients decreased their percentage of fat mass measured by BIA [median -2.9%; range -1.0-(-6.6); P = 0.005]. The administered GH dose correlated negatively with the relative change in whole body resistance (r = -0.66; P = 0.04). All, but one of the patients improved their quality of life score after GH therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In a group of young patients with childhood onset GH deficiency, 9 months of treatment with a low GH dose (median 0.14 IU/kg/week) caused no significant deterioration of glucose tolerance. The strong negative associations between BMI or percentage fat mass and IGFBP-1 suggest that serum IGFBP-1 is more closely related than insulin to body composition in GH deficient patients. It is important to consider which critical endpoints should determine the GH dose. We would suggest that, apart for normalizing the serum IGF-I level, another main endpoint should be normalization of, or at least avoidance of any deterioration in glucose tolerance.     

Monitoring serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), IGF-I/IGFBP-3 molar ratio and leptin during growth hormone treatment for disordered growth

OBJECTIVE: Serum IGF-I levels are monitored during GH replacement treatment in adults with GH deficiency (GHD) to guide GH dose adjustment and to minimize occurrence of GH-related side-effects. This is not routine practice in children treated with GH. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in (1) serum IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 molar ratio, and (2) serum leptin, an indirect marker of GH response, during the first year of GH treatment in children with disordered growth. DESIGN: An observational prospective longitudinal study with serial measurements at five time points during the first year of GH treatment was carried out. Each patient served as his/her own control. PATIENTS: The study included 31 patients, grouped as (1) GHD (n = 20) and (2) non-GHD (Turner syndrome n = 7; Noonan syndrome n = 4), who had not previously received GH treatment. MEASUREMENTS: Serum IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and leptin levels were measured before treatment and after 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months of GH treatment, with a mean dose of 0.5 IU/kg/wk in GHD and 0.7 IU/kg/wk in non-GHD groups. IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and the calculated IGF-I/IGFBP-3 molar ratio were expressed as SD scores using reference values from the local population. RESULTS: In the GHD group, IGF-I SDS before treatment was lower compared with the non-GHD (-5.4+/-2.5 vs. -1.8+/-1.0; P<0.001). IGF-I (-1.8 SDS +/- 2.2) and IGFBP-3 (-1.1 SDS +/- 0.6) levels and their molar ratios were highest at 6 weeks and remained relatively constant thereafter. In the non-GHD group, IGF-I levels increased throughout the year and were maximum at 12 months (0.3 SDS +/- 1.4) while IGFBP-3 (1.1 SDS +/- 0.9) and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 molar ratio peaked at 6 months. In both groups, IGF-I SDS and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 during treatment correlated with the dose of GH expressed as IU/m2/week (r-values 0. 77 to 0.89; P = 0.005) but not as IU/kg/week. Serum leptin levels decreased significantly during GH treatment in the GHD (median before treatment 4.0 microg/l; median after 12 months treatment 2.4 microg/l; P = 0.02) but not the non-GHD (median before treatment 3.0 microg/l; median after 12 months treatment 2.6 microg/l). In the GHD group, serum leptin before treatment correlated with 12 month change in height SDS (r = 0.70, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and their molar ratio during the first year of GH treatment differed between the GHD and non-GHD groups. Calculation of GH dose by surface area may be preferable to calculating by body weight. As a GH dose-dependent increase in serum IGF-I and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 may be associated with adverse effects, serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 should be monitored routinely during long-term GH treatment. Serum leptin was the only variable that correlated with first year growth response in GHD.     

Effects of 36 hour fasting on GH/IGF-I axis and metabolic parameters in patients with simple obesity. Comparison with normal subjects and hypopituitary patients with severe GH deficiency

OBJECTIVE: Reduction of growth hormone (GH) secretion in obesity probably reflects neuroendocrine and metabolic abnormalities. Even short-term fasting stimulates GH secretion and distinguishes normal from hypopituitary subjects with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Marked weight loss improves GH secretion in obesity but the effect of fasting is controversial. We studied the effects of a 36 h fasting on the GH/IGF-I axis and metabolic parameters in obesity. SUBJECTS: We studied nine obese patients (OB; three male and six female; age, 29.2+/-4.8; range, 18-59 y; body mass index (BMI), 43.4+/-2.7 kg/m(2); WHR, 0.9+/-0.1). Fifteen normal subjects (NS; eight male and seven female 28.9+/-0.6, 25-35 y; 21.6+/-0.4 kg/m(2)) and 10 adult hypopituitary patients with severe GH deficiency (GHD; seven male and three female; 37.6+/-2.3, 29-50 y; 24.5+/-1.0 kg/m(2); GH peak<3 microg/l after ITT and/or<9 microg/l after GHRH+arginine) served as control groups. STUDY DESIGN: We studied the effects of 36 h fasting on 8 h diurnal mean GH, insulin and glucose concentrations (mGHc, mINSc and mGLUc; assay every 30 min from 8.00 am to 4.00 pm) as well as on IGF-I, IGFBP-3, ALS, IGFBP-1, GHBP and free fatty acid (FFA) levels. RESULTS: Before fasting, basal IGF-I and ALS levels in OB were similar to those in NS and both were higher (P<0.001) than those in GHD. IGFBP-3 levels in OB were lower (P<0.01) than in NS but higher (P<0.02) than in GHD. GHBP levels in OB and GHD were similar and both were higher (P<0.01) than in NS. Glucose levels were similar in all groups. FFA levels in OB were higher (P<0.01) than in NS but similar to those in GHD. IGFBP-1 in OB were lower (P<0.05) than in NS and GHD which, in turn, were similar. On the other hand, mINSc in OB was higher (P<0.01) than that in NS and GHD which, in turn, were similar. The mGHc in OB was similar to that in NS but only the latter was higher (P<0.05) than in GHD. The individual mGHc in the three groups overlapped. After fasting, IGF-I levels in GHD were unchanged while they decreased in OB (P=NS) as well as in NS (P<0.01). IGFBP-3 and ALS levels did not change. GHBP levels in OB and GHD were unchanged while they increased in NS (P<0.01). Glucose and FFA levels were reduced and increased, respectively, in all groups (P<0.02 and P<0.01). IGFBP-1 increased while mINSc decreased in all groups (P<0.02 and P<0.01); in OB they persisted lower and higher (P<0.01) respectively, than in NS and GHD. Fasting significantly increased mGHc in NS (P<0.001) but not in OB as well as in GHD. Individual mGHc in OB showed persistent overlap with GHD. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term fasting does not increase GH secretion in obesity and does not distinguish somatotroph function in obese from that in severe GHD adults. Short-term fasting in obesity has attenuated effects on insulin and IGFBP-1 secretion while it normally increases free fatty acids in spite of any change in GH secretion.     

Enhancement of the peripheral sensitivity to growth hormone in adults with GH deficiency

OBJECTIVE: Adults with severe GH deficiency (GHD) need recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) replacement to restore body composition, structure functions and metabolic abnormalities. The optimal rhGH dose for replacement has been progressively reduced to avoid side effects. The aim of the present study was to define the minimal rhGH dose able to increase both IGF-I and IGF binding protein (BP)-3 levels in GHD and to verify the possible change in GH sensitivity. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: To this goal, we studied the effect of 4-day treatment with 3 rhGH doses (1.25, 2.5 and 5.0 microg/kg/day) on IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in 25 panhypopituitary adults with severe GHD (12 males and 13 females, age: 44.5+/-3.0 years, body mass index (BMI): 27.0+/-0.9 kg/m(2)) and 21 normal young adult volunteers (NV, 12 males and 9 females, age: 30.5+/-2.0 years, BMI: 20.8+/-0.5 kg/m(2)). RESULTS: Basal IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in GHD were lower (P<0.001) than in NV. In NV the 1.25 microg/kg dose of rhGH did not modify IGF-I levels. The dose of 2.5 microg/kg rhGH significantly increased IGF-I levels in men (P<0.001) but not in women, while the 5.0 microg/kg dose increased IGF-I levels in both sexes (P<0.001). IGFBP-3 levels were not modified by any of the administered rhGH doses. In GHD patients, all rhGH doses increased IGF-I levels 12 h after both the first (P<0.01) and the fourth rhGH dose (P<0.001). At the end of treatment percentage increases in IGF-I were higher (P<0.001) in GHD patients than in NV. In contrast with NV, in GHD patients the IGF-I response to short-term stimulation with rhGH was independent of gender. Moreover, GHD patients showed increases in IGFBP-3 after the fourth administration of both 2.5 and 5.0 microg/kg rhGH. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study demonstrate that the minimal rhGH dose able to increase IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in GHD patients is lower than in normal subjects, at least after a very short treatment. This evidence suggests an enhanced peripheral GH sensitivity in GH deprivation.     

Leptin does not mediate short-term fasting-induced changes in growth hormone pulsatility but increases IGF-I in leptin deficiency states

CONTEXT: States of acute and chronic energy deficit are characterized by increased GH secretion and decreased IGF-I levels. Objective: The objective of the study was to determine whether changes in levels of leptin, a key mediator of the adaptation to starvation, regulate the GH-IGF system during energy deficit. DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTION: We studied 14 healthy normal-weight men and women during three conditions: baseline fed and 72-h fasting (to induce hypoleptinemia) with administration of placebo or recombinant methionyl human leptin (r-metHuLeptin) (to reverse the fasting associated hypoleptinemia). We also studied eight normal-weight women with exercise-induced chronic energy deficit and hypothalamic amenorrhea at baseline and during 2-3 months of r-metHuLeptin treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: GH pulsatility, IGF levels, IGF and GH binding protein (GHBP) levels were measured. RESULTS: During short-term energy deficit, measures of GH pulsatility and disorderliness and levels of IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-1 increased, whereas leptin, insulin, IGF-I (total and free), IGFBP-4, IGFBP-6, and GHBP decreased; r-metHuLeptin administration blunted the starvation-associated decrease of IGF-I. In chronic energy deficit, total and free IGF-I, IGFBP-6, and GHBP levels were lower, compared with euleptinemic controls; r-metHuLeptin administration had no major effect on GH pulsatility after 2 wk but increased total IGF-I levels and tended to increase free IGF-I and IGFBP-3 after 1 month. CONCLUSIONS: The GH/IGF system changes associated with energy deficit are largely independent of leptin deficiency. During acute energy deficit, r-metHuLeptin administration in replacement doses blunts the starvation-induced decrease of IGF-I, but during chronic energy deficit, r-metHuLeptin administration increases IGF-I and tends to increase free IGF-I and IGFBP-3.     

Continuation of growth hormone (GH) replacement in GH-deficient patients during transition from childhood to adulthood: a two-year placebo-controlled study

Previous studies have demonstrated beneficial effects of GH replacement, in adults with GH deficiency (GHD), on body composition, physical fitness, and quality of life. These studies, however, concern patients with adult-onset GHD or childhood-onset (CO) patients enrolled several years after withdrawal of initial therapy. So far, the effects of continuation of GH-administration in patients with CO-GHD have not been examined. We studied a group of nineteen young adults (13 males + 6 females; 16-26 yr old; mean age, 20.2 +/- 0.65 yr) with CO-GHD, in a randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial for 1 yr, followed by an open phase with GH for 1 yr. All patients received GH therapy at the start of study, and trial medication (GH/placebo) was given in a similar dose. Patients randomized to continued GH treatment exhibited no significant changes in any parameters tested, but intra- and interindividual variations in insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I levels could suggest compliance problems. Discontinuation of GH for 1 yr resulted in a decrease in serum IGF-I, from 422.0 +/- 56.8 to 147.8 +/- 33.4 microg/L, in the placebo group (P = 0.003). After discontinuation of GH for 1 yr, an increase in total body fat (TBF, kg), measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan, was seen [placebo: 22.7 +/- 2.7 to 26.5 +/- 2.5 (P = 0.01); GH: 16.2 +/- 2.1 to 17.2 +/- 2.1 (not significant)]. Resumption of GH after placebo was followed by increments in serum IGF-I (microg/L) [from 147.8 +/- 33.4 to 452 +/- 76 (P = 0.001)] and IGF-binding protein 3, as well as in fasting glucose (mmol/L) [4.9 +/- 0.2 vs. 5.3 +/- 0.2 (P = 0.03)]. After resumption of GH lean body mass (kg) increased [52.4 +/- 4.9 vs. 60.7 +/- 5.6 (P = 0.006)]. Likewise, resumption of GH therapy increased thigh muscle volume and thigh muscle/fat ratio, as assessed by computed tomography [muscle volume (cm2/10 mm): 118.2 +/- 11.7 vs. 130.0 +/- 10.9 (P = 0.002); muscle/fat ratio: 1.33 +/- 0.24 vs. 1.69 +/- 0.36 (P = 0.02)]. In conclusion, discontinuation of GH treatment in GHD patients, during the transition from childhood to adulthood, induces significant and potentially unfavorable changes in IGF-I and body composition, both of which are reversed after resumption of GH treatment. By contrast, continuation of GH therapy results in unaltered IGF-I and body composition. We recommend continuation of GH therapy in these patients, to be undertaken in collaboration between pediatricians and adult endocrinologists.     

Effects of GH on cognitive function in elderly patients with adult-onset GH deficiency: a placebo-controlled 12-month study

OBJECTIVE: Young adults with childhood-onset GH deficiency (GHD) have reduced memory and attention, which can be improved by treatment with GH. Little information is available on cognitive function in elderly GHD patients. DESIGN: Single center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of 52-week duration. METHODS: Elderly GH therapy na?ve GHD patients (n=34; age range 60-77 years) were enrolled and randomized to receive placebo or GH therapy which was titrated to achieve a target IGF-I level of +1 to +2 s.d. of the normal mean for age. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and after 24 and 52 weeks, using a computerized psychometric test package (Neurobehavioral Examination System-2). RESULTS: The mean GH dose was 0.16+/-0.06 mg/day; mean IGF-I increased from 135+/-59 ng/ml at baseline to 213+/-77 ng/ml during active treatment. The GH-treated group had better mean serial digit learning scores compared with placebo group (P<0.05). Assessment of effect sizes showed that improvements in memory occurred with GH after 24 weeks. The overall adverse event rates were similar in the GH and the placebo group. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that GH replacement may be accompanied by improvement in certain measures of cognitive function in elderly patients with GHD.     

Estrogen priming effect on growth hormone (GH) provocative test: a useful tool for the diagnosis of GH deficiency

We have studied the effect of estradiol (E2) on the GH-insulin-like growth factor (GH-IGF) axis in 15 prepubertal GH deficiency (GHD) children and 44 prepubertal or early pubertal children with idiopathic short stature (SS). All of them received a daily dose of micronized E2 (1 or 2 mg) or placebo, for 3 days, before a sequential arginine-clonidine test. In SS children, GH maximal responses were 17.8+/-10.9 on placebo and 27.9+/-14.5 microg/L on estrogen (P < 0.0001). The lower 95% confidence limits for GH maximal response changed from 3.7 microg/L (without E2) to 8.3 microg/L (on E2). In GHD children, no significant stimulatory effect of estrogen on GH levels was observed. After placebo, a cut-off limit of 3.7 microg/L (the lower 95% confidence interval limit) resulted in 73% sensitivity, 95% specificity, and an overall 90% diagnostic efficiency. After E2, a cut-off limit of 8.3 microg/L resulted in a sensitivity of 87%, a specificity of 98%, and a diagnostic efficiency of 95%. After placebo, 68% of SS showed normal IGF-I levels, and the mean did not change on E2 (13.7+/-6.3 vs. 14.3+/-6.8 nmol/L, not significant). In 93% of SS, IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3 levels were normal during placebo. On E2, mean IGFBP-3 did not change (2.63+/-0.70 vs. 2.70+/-0.70 mg/L, not significant). In 14 of 15 GHD patients, IGF-I values were below normal on placebo, and the mean of the group did not change after E2. During placebo, 13 of 15 GHD children presented low IGFBP-3 values. During E2, there was a small significant increase in IGFBP-3 values (1.06+/-0.58 vs. 1.20+/-0.69 mg/L, P < 0.02). The highest diagnostic efficiencies for IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were observed during placebo (75% and 91%, respectively). We conclude that GH stimulation tests after E2 priming had the highest diagnostic efficiency. Our findings suggest that the effect of estrogen priming on GH stimulated levels, by reducing the number of false nonresponders, might be useful to better discriminate between normal and abnormal GH status in SS children.     

Effects of growth hormone replacement on physical performance and body composition in GH deficient adults

OBJECTIVES: Adults with GH deficiency complain frequently of low energy levels resulting in a low perceived quality of life. Body composition is altered, with increased fat mass and decreased lean body mass, and muscle strength is reduced. The aims of this study were to determine the effects of GH replacement on physical performance and body composition in GH deficient (GHD) adults. STUDY DESIGN: The study consisted of a 6-month randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study of the administration of GH (0.25 IU/Kg/week (0.125 IU/kg/week for the first four weeks)) followed by a 6-month open phase of GH therapy. PATIENTS: Thirty-five GHD adults (17F), mean age 39.8 years (range 21.1-59.9), on conventional replacement therapy as required. METHODS: Maximum aerobic capacity was measured using an incremental walking test to volitional exhaustion on a motorized treadmill. Quadriceps muscle strength was assessed by measuring maximum voluntary contractions and body composition by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). RESULTS: There were no statistically significant changes in quadriceps muscle strength between the GH and placebo groups. In both groups, there was a significant increase in quadriceps muscle strength compared to baseline during the double-blind period (GH group: P = 0.016; placebo group: P = 0.048). Compared to baseline, muscle strength was further improved in the GH treatment group after 12 months of treatment (P = 0.007). No further improvement was noted in the placebo group after 6 months on open GH treatment. In the placebo group, maximum aerobic capacity decreased during the placebo period (P = 0.017). No significant change was observed in the GH group. During open GH treatment the previously placebo treated group had a significant increase of maximum aerobic capacity (P < 0.049) whereas no significant improvement could be seen in the GH group. In the GH group there was a significant increase in lean body mass (P = 0.001) and a significant decrease in fat mass (P < 0.001). No statistically significant changes were noted in the placebo group: the differences in these changes between treatment groups were statistically significant (lean body mass: P = 0.009; fat mass: P < 0.001). The changes in body composition in the GH group during the 6 month placebo-controlled period were maintained during continued open treatment. Similar changes in body composition to those observed in the GH group during the 6 month placebo-controlled period were also seen in the placebo group once the patients received GH treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that GH replacement in GH deficient adults is associated with favourable changes in body composition, which could be important in the long term health outcome and physical activity of GH deficient patients. Our data support the concept that GH therapy alone, in the absence of some form of exercise programme, may increase the amount of lean tissue but not the quality or functional capacity of this tissue and it may be that training, in addition to GH therapy, may be necessary to significantly increase physical performance in these patients. We suggest that future trials with GH therapy and general approaches to the treatment of GH deficiency should include a planned activity programme as an approach to health improvement in these patients.     

High serum levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) during high-dose GH treatment in short children born small for gestational age

CONTEXT: Epidemiological studies have indicated that high serum levels of GH and IGF-I are associated with long-term risks. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the changes in serum levels of GH during overnight profiles, IGF-I, and IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) in short small for gestational age (SGA) children during GH treatment with two doses. PATIENTS: Thirty-six prepubertal short SGA children were the subjects of this study. Intervention: Subjects received 1 (group A) or 2 (group B) mg GH/m(2).d. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At baseline and after 6 months of GH treatment, overnight GH profiles were performed, and serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels were measured. RESULTS: After 6 months, group B had significantly higher GH levels during the profile (mean, maximum, and area under the curve above zero line) than group A (P < 0.009). In group B, maximum GH levels increased from 43.9-161 mU/liter (P < 0.0002), and in group A, from 57.2-104 mU/liter (P = 0.002). During the profile (i.e. 12 h per day), children of group B had mean GH levels of 64.4 vs. 34.8 mU/liter in group A (P = 0.001). The IGF-I and IGF-I to IGFBP-3 ratio sd scores increased significantly in both groups, but were higher in group B than A [1.5 vs. 0.2 (P = 0.002) and 1.4 vs. 0.3 (P = 0.007), respectively]. In group B, 74% of the children had IGF-I levels in the highest quintile during GH treatment compared with 19% in group A. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that high-dose GH treatment in short SGA children results in high serum GH and IGF-I levels in most children. We recommend monitoring IGF-I levels during GH therapy to ensure that these remain within the normal range.