Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia can occur in patients receiving clopidogrel and aspirin

Platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptors may play a role in potentiating platelet activation induced by IgG from patients with immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), as shown by previous studies using the ADP receptor antagonists AR-C66096 and ticlopidine. Consistent with these observations, we found that platelet activation by HIT sera is also significantly reduced in patients receiving clopidogrel, an ADP receptor antagonist prodrug now in wide clinical use. Despite these in vitro and ex vivo findings, we observed two patients develop acute HIT while receiving both clopidogrel and aspirin: both patients' sera tested strongly positive in a heparin-dependent washed platelet activation assay (100% serotonin release) and PF4/heparin-enzyme-immunoassay (2.594 and 2.190 absorbance units). Both patients also developed HIT-associated clinical sequelae (acute systemic reaction postintravenous heparin bolus; thrombotic stroke) in association with their episode of HIT. We conclude that combined therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel does not necessarily protect against clinical HIT, at least in patients with HIT antibodies that have strong platelet-activating characteristics.     

Effect of fondaparinux on platelet activation in the presence of heparin-dependent antibodies: a blinded comparative multicenter study with unfractionated heparin

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a complication of heparin therapy caused by antibodies against a complex of platelet factor 4 and heparin. Fondaparinux (Arixtra) is a new synthetic selective factor Xa inhibitor. We performed a serologic study to determine the cross-reactivity of HIT sera with fondaparinux. Using a prospective, blinded study design, 39 clinically and serologically confirmed sera from patients with HIT and 15 control sera were sent to 3 different laboratories, each of which specialized in a particular HIT assay. These include the serotonin release assay, heparin-induced platelet agglutination assay, and platelet aggregation assay. Two of 82 assays (2.4%) performed in the presence of control sera were positive, both with unfractionated heparin. In the presence of HIT sera, 75 of 94 (79.8%) evaluable assays were positive with unfractionated heparin; fondaparinux was significantly (P < .001) less reactive than unfractionated heparin, only 3 of 91 evaluable assays (3.3%) being positive. Using flow cytometry, unlike unfractionated heparin, fondaparinux did not induce the binding of PAC1 and anti-CD62 monoclonal antibodies or of annexin V to platelets with HIT sera. Together, these results suggest that fondaparinux is nonreactive to HIT sera and raise the possibility that the drug may be used for prophylaxis and treatment of thrombosis in patients with a history of HIT.     

Morphological analysis of microparticle generation in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) with thrombosis is a serious complication of heparin use. HIT sera can generate platelet-derived microparticles, which are produced in a heparin-dependent manner and are hypothesized to be important initial pathological participants because they promote vascular occlusion. To date, microparticles have been studied using flow cytometric techniques. However, it is uncertain whether the small-sized material seen in flow cytometric studies represents true platelet microparticles shed from activated platelets or whether they are platelets that have contracted after releasing their internal components. This report describes a morphological investigation of platelet-derived microparticles in HIT using, among other techniques, confocal, scanning electron, and transmission electron microscopy. Following incubation with HIT sera, the existence of small membrane-bound vesicles in the milieu of activated platelets was demonstrated. A population of microparticles, expressing platelet-specific glycoproteins, was separated from platelets by centrifugation over a sucrose layer. These microparticles had identical flow cytometric profiles, size heterogeneity, and GPIb(alpha) and GPIIb/IIIa staining intensity as the microparticle population in unfractionated samples. When microparticles were generated in situ and fixed onto grids, they were demonstrated to be distinct membrane-bound vesicles that originated near the platelet body and terminal ends of pseudopods on activated platelets. These microparticles appeared to be generated by localized swelling, budding, and release. Collectively, these morphological studies document the existence of true microparticles in platelets activated by HIT sera. The microparticles may play an important role in the pathogenesis of HIT.     

The complicated relationships of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and platelet factor 4 antibodies with COVID-19

COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) represents a prothrombotic disorder, and there have been several reports of platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies being present in COVID-19-infected patients. This has thus been identified in some publications as representing a high incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), whereas in others, findings have been tempered by general lack of functional reactivity using confirmation assays of serotonin release assay (SRA) or heparin-induced platelet aggregation (HIPA). Moreover, in at least two publications, data are provided suggesting that antibodies can arise in heparin naïve patients or that platelet activation may not be heparin-dependent. From this literature, we would conclude that platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies can be observed in COVID-19-infected patients, and they may occur at higher incidence than in historical non-COVID-19-infected cohorts. However, the situation is complex, since not all platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies may lead to platelet activation, and not all identified antibodies are heparin-dependent, such that they do not necessarily reflect “true” HIT. Most recently, a “HIT-like” syndrome has reported in patients who have been vaccinated against COVID-19. Accordingly, much more is yet to be learnt about the insidious disease that COVID-19 represents, including autoimmune outcomes in affected patients.     

A platelet viability assay (PVA) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) requires functional assays measuring platelet activation as they are highly specific and sensitive. A useful functional test for diagnosing HIT is the serotonin release assay (SRA), but this assay is technically demanding and requires a radioactive marker. We describe an alternate functional HIT assay, the platelet viability assay (PVA), that overcomes the need for a radioactive marker by using a viability dye endpoint to measure platelet activation. We compared the performance characteristics of the PVA to the SRA. Serum samples from 76 patients with suspected HIT were tested in both the PVA and the SRA. The PVA uses calcein-AM as a marker of platelet viability, with decreases in fluorescence and cell size as surrogate markers for platelet activation. A significant linear correlation (Spearman correlation, r = ?0.78, P < 0.0001) was observed between the PVA and SRA. Calcein-AM fluorescence decreased in a negative linear relationship with platelet activation as measured by ¹⁴C-serotonin release. The PVA detected all positive SRA samples, with an overall sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 97% in comparison to the SRA. The measurement of platelet viability using the PVA provided similar results to the SRA when testing suspected HIT patient samples.     

Heparin-dependent and -independent anti-platelet factor 4 autoantibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective. Antibodies that recognize complexes formed by platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin are involved in the pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). This study was undertaken to investigate the prevalence and clinical correlations of anti-PF4 autoantibodies in patients with SLE. Methods. We studied 118 patients with SLE, 78 with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), 27 with primary APS, 2 with HIT (as positive controls) and 47 healthy controls. Heparin-dependent and -independent anti-PF4 antibodies were measured with an ELISA. Antibody binding was confirmed to be heparin-dependent when inhibited by the presence of a high concentration of heparin. Pathogenic anti-PF4 antibody was assessed by serotonin-release assay. Results. Heparin-dependent anti-PF4 antibodies were detected in 11 SLE (9%) and 2 primary ITP (3%) patients, but at much lower levels than in HIT patients. In serotonin-release assays, only the HIT sera induced platelet activation in vitro. Heparin-independent anti-PF4 antibodies were detected in 17 SLE patients (14%). There was no correlation between the levels of heparin-dependent and -independent anti-PF4 antibodies. Cross-reactivity between these two antibodies was not detectable by ELISA competitive assay. Heparin-dependent anti-PF4 antibodies were associated with thrombocytopenia and IgM aCLs (P?=?0.007 for both comparisons), while heparin-independent anti-PF4 antibody levels were correlated with SLE disease activity index (P?=?0.0005). None of the SLE patients with anti-PF4 antibodies had previous heparin exposure. Conclusion. PF4 is an autoimmune target in SLE patients. Heparin-dependent and -independent anti-PF4 autoantibodies may be involved in different aspects of pathophysiology of SLE.     

Laboratory diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a clinical‐pathological disorder; thus, laboratory testing for the pathogenic platelet‐activating antiplatelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies is central for diagnosis. The “iceberg” model summarizes the inter‐relationship between platelet activation assays and PF4‐dependent immunoassays, with platelet‐activating antibodies comprising a subset of anti‐PF4/heparin antibodies. The platelet serotonin‐release assay (SRA), performed by reference laboratories, has high sensitivity and specificity for HIT (~95% each), and is especially suited for detecting highly pathogenic HIT sera containing both heparin‐dependent and heparin‐independent platelet‐activating antibodies; this latter subgroup of antibodies explains “autoimmune HIT” disorders (delayed‐onset, persisting, spontaneous, heparin “flush,” fondaparinux‐associated). Recently, SRA‐negative HIT has become recognized, in which serum from some HIT patients contains subthreshold levels of platelet‐activating antibodies (by SRA) that become detectable using a PF4‐enhanced platelet activation assay. Unusual immunologic features of HIT include early antibody detectability (at onset of platelet count fall) and antibody transience (seroreversion). Widely available PF4‐dependent enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) have high sensitivity but poor specificity for HIT, although specificity is enhanced with IgG‐specific EIAs and strong positive results; unfortunately, EIA results are usually not available in real time. Automated rapid immunoassays, such as the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and latex immunoturbidimetric assay (LIA), facilitate real‐time laboratory diagnosis. Recently available likelihood ratio (LR) data for positive (LR+) and negative (LR?) test results allow clinicians to adjust their pretest probabilities for HIT, using Bayesian analysis, into real‐time posttest probabilities that are dramatically increased (test positive) or decreased (test negative). Moreover, (semi‐)quantitative CLIA‐ and LIA‐positive results (weak, moderate, strong positive) can further refine the posttest probability of HIT.     

Laboratory testing for VITT antibodies

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a highly prothrombotic disorder that like heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet-activating antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4). However, unlike HIT—where heparin at low concentrations (0.1-0.5 U/mL) typically enhances antibody-induced platelet activation, platelet activation by VITT sera is usually inhibited by heparin. Further, conventional platelet activation assays for HIT, such as the serotonin-release assay (SRA) and heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) test, often yield negative or atypical results when testing VITT sera. Nevertheless, VITT (like HIT) is a “clinical-pathological” disorder whereby laboratory detectability of platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies is crucial for diagnosis. VITT antibodies follow 2 fundamental principles of HIT laboratory testing: (1) high probability of a positive PF4-dependent enzyme-immunoassay (EIA), and (2) high probability of a positive platelet activation assay. However, optimal detection of VITT in platelet activation assays requires the addition of PF4, for example, PF4-enhanced SRA (PF4-SRA) and PF4-enhanced HIPA (PIPA). A novel whole blood assay, called the PF4-induced flow cytometry-based platelet activation (PIFPA) assay, exhibits high sensitivity and specificity for VITT. HIT and VITT sera/plasmas differ in their reactivity in rapid HIT immunoassays (90-97% sensitivity for HIT, <25% sensitivity for VITT), consistent with distinct antigen sites on PF4 recognized by HIT and VITT antibodies.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: evaluation of IgG and IgGAM ELISA assays

Background: Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare complication of heparin therapy resulting from antibody production to platelet factor 4 and heparin complexes (H‐PF4). Methods: We have evaluated four enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)‐based screening tests to identify the best assay(s) with the highest specificity but without underdiagnosis of HIT. As functional assays are difficult to perform, ELISAs are useful to provide clinicians with a timely answer. Over a 10‐month period, all samples (N = 107) referred to our laboratory were tested for HIT antibodies using four commercially available ELISA kits, two detecting IgG/A/M anti‐H‐PF4 antibodies and the other two IgG specific. Results: Twenty‐eight samples were positive by at least one assay; IgGAM ELISAs were found to be more sensitive with 24 samples positive by Asserachrom IgGAM and 23 by Zymutest IgGAM. Only 18 samples were positive by GTI‐PF4‐IgG and Zymutest IgG. The gold standard serotonin release assay (SRA) was used as a confirmation assay, and 11/28 samples tested positive. All these SRA‐positive samples were positive by all four assays. None of the IgGAM‐only‐positive samples was found to be positive by SRA suggesting a better specificity for the IgG‐only assays. Conclusion: Our data strongly support the use of IgG‐only assays for the detection of HIT antibodies.     

Laboratory tests for identification or exclusion of heparin induced thrombocytopenia: HIT or miss?

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially fatal condition that arises subsequent to formation of antibodies against complexes containing heparin, usually platelet‐factor 4‐heparin (“anti‐PF4‐heparin”). Assessment for HIT involves both clinical evaluation and, if indicated, laboratory testing for confirmation or exclusion, typically using an initial immunological assay (“screening”), and only if positive, a secondary functional assay for confirmation. Many different immunological and functional assays have been developed. The most common contemporary immunological assays comprise enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA], chemiluminescence, lateral flow, and particle gel techniques. The most common functional assays measure platelet aggregation or platelet activation events (e.g., serotonin release assay; heparin‐induced platelet activation (HIPA); flow cytometry). All assays have some sensitivity and specificity to HIT antibodies, but differ in terms of relative sensitivity and specificity for pathological HIT, as well as false negative and false positive error rate. This brief article overviews the different available laboratory methods, as well as providing a suggested approach to diagnosis or exclusion of HIT.     

Beneficial effect of exogenous platelet factor 4 for detecting pathogenic heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia antibodies

The laboratory diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is based on an enzyme immunoassay combined with a functional test, and serotonin release assay (SRA) is the gold standard for detecting activating HIT antibodies. However, a recent atypical history of HIT prompted us to evaluate whether addition of platelet factor 4 (PF4) during SRA could improve its ability to detect pathogenic HIT antibodies. Using 5B9, a monoclonal antibody to PF4/H with a human Fc fragment, we first defined the optimal PF4 concentration for detecting low amounts of platelet‐activating IgG with SRA. Plasma samples from 50 patients with suspected HIT were then studied, and SRA was positive in 17 cases (Group SRA^pos), with relatively high levels of PF4‐specific IgG (median optical density = 2·66). SRA was also systematically performed after adding 10 μg/ml of PF4 in the reaction mixture, and significant serotonin release was measured with samples from 9 additional patients (Group PF4‐SRA^pos). Importantly, levels of PF4‐specific IgG were similar in these samples and those from the 24 persistently SRA negative patients. Moreover, the pre‐test probability of HIT was intermediate/high in all ‘SRA^pos’ or ‘SRA‐PF4^pos’ patients. In conclusion, addition of exogenous PF4 might improve the detection of pathogenic HIT antibodies by SRA.     

The platelet serotonin‐release assay

Few laboratory tests are as clinically useful as The platelet serotonin‐release assay (SRA): a positive SRA in the appropriate clinical context is virtually diagnostic of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a life‐ and limb‐threatening prothrombotic disorder caused by anti‐platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies that activate platelets, thereby triggering serotonin‐release. The SRA's performance characteristics include high sensitivity and specificity, although caveats include indeterminate reaction profiles (observed in ～4% of test sera) and potential for false‐positive reactions. As only a subset of anti‐PF4/heparin antibodies detectable by enzyme‐immunoassay (EIA) are additionally platelet‐activating, the SRA has far greater diagnostic specificity than the EIA. However, requiring a positive EIA, either as an initial screening test or as an SRA adjunct, will reduce risk of a false‐positive SRA (since a negative EIA in a patient with a “positive” SRA should prompt critical evaluation of the SRA reaction profile). The SRA also provides useful information on whether a HIT serum produces strong platelet activation even in the absence of heparin: such heparin‐“independent” platelet activation is a marker of unusually severe HIT, including delayed‐onset HIT and severe HIT complicated by consumptive coagulopathy with risk for microvascular thrombosis. Am. J. Hematol. 90:564–572, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Changes in platelet count after cardiac surgery can effectively predict the development of pathogenic heparin-dependent antibodies

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) induces the release of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and patients are at risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). This study was aimed to determine whether an abnormal evolution in platelet count (PC) after CPB is predictive of the development of HIT antibodies. Two abnormal PC patterns were defined: pattern P1, characterized by a decrease in PC following previous correction of thrombocytopenia occurring during CPB, and pattern P2, defined as a persistent low PC in the days following CPB. PC was evaluated for 10 d in 305 consecutive patients before and after CPB. Serotonin release assay (SRA) was carried out between days 8 and 10 to detect pathogenic heparin-dependent antibodies. Moreover, antibodies to heparin-PF4 (H-PF4) complexes were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. PC evolution after CPB was normal in 300 patients although antibodies to H-PF4 were frequently present (53.4%). Changes in PC were abnormal in five patients with pattern P1 (n = 4) or P2 (n = 1). As SRA was positive in four of the five cases, the positive predictive value of abnormal PC pattern for pathogenic HIT antibodies was 80%. Careful follow-up of PC after CPB makes it possible to predict with high specificity (99%) for those patients who develop pathogenic HIT antibodies.     

Increased expression of platelet IgG Fc receptors in immune heparin- induced thrombocytopenia

Our previous finding that heparin-dependent antibodies in heparin- induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) bind to platelets via platelet IgG Fc receptors (FcRs) prompted this study. Platelet FcRs in 16 patients with HIT, 23 control patients, and 42 normal subjects were studied. Patients with HIT had substantially increased platelet FcRs during the acute illness. Those who suffered serious thrombotic complications or died shortly after diagnosis had significantly more FcRs per platelet than those with milder disease. Consistent with their increased FcRs, platelets of patients with HIT showed increased aggregation reactivity to aggregated IgG and heparin-dependent antibodies. Platelet FcRs in patients with HIT remained elevated for 1 to 3 months after the acute illness then stabilized to a mean value not significantly different from either control group. The increased expression of FcRs on HIT platelets and their increased reactivity to heparin-dependent antibodies may contribute to the pathogenesis of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in HIT.     

Incidence and clinical significance of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies of the IgG, IgM, and IgA class in 755 consecutive patient samples referred for diagnostic testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is usually caused by anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies, leading to intravascular platelet activation. These antibodies can be detected by PF4/polyanion antigen assays or platelet activation assays. While antigen assays are very sensitive and recognize immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgA, and IgM antibodies, the role of IgM and IgA HIT-antibodies is debated. Platelet activation assays recognize IgG and are more specific for clinical HIT. METHODS: We analyzed sera from 755 consecutive patients referred for diagnostic testing for HIT using a PF4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for IgG, IgA, and IgM and by the heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) test. Clinical information was provided by the treating physicians. RESULTS: A total of 108 of 755 (14.3%) patients tested positive, 105 (13.9%) in the PF4/heparin IgG/A/M ELISA [28 (26.7%) only for IgM/A]; 53 (7.0%) sera were positive in the HIPA, of those 50 tested also positive in the ELISA. In 77 patients sufficient clinical information was provided. Available clinical information for 17 of the 28 patients who had only IgM and/or IgA detected showed plausible alternative (non-HIT) explanations in four of seven who had thromboembolic complications and in nine of 10 who had isolated HIT. CONCLUSION: Detection of IgG, IgM and IgA class antibodies by PF4/heparin ELISA yields a positive test result about twice as often as does a platelet activation assay, with only a minority of the additional patients detected likely having HIT. Thus, there is a potential for considerable over-diagnosis of HIT by laboratories that utilize only an ELISA for diagnostic testing.     

A diagnostic test for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia can be a serious and difficult-to- diagnose complication of heparin therapy. Serum from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia can cause heparin-dependent platelet aggregation, but the low sensitivity and specificity of this test limit its clinical usefulness. In this report we describe an assay for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia that is both sensitive and specific. The improvement in the assay was accomplished by measuring platelet release instead of aggregation and by measuring platelet release at two heparin concentrations. The rationale for the use of two heparin concentrations was that sera from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia caused release at therapeutic but not at high concentrations of heparin. Twenty-eight sera samples from patients suspected of having heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and 573 controls were coded and tested in the assay. The patients with possible heparin- induced thrombocytopenia were ranked according to the likelihood of having this disorder by using prospectively defined criteria. The test had a high specificity (99%); only one of 573 controls showed a positive result. The test was also very sensitive, and the likelihood of a positive test result was directly correlated with the clinical likelihood of the patient having heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Six of six patients with definitive heparin-induced thrombocytopenia had positive test results, whereas zero of four patients in whom the diagnosis was unlikely had positive test results. The two-point test for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia represents a sensitive and specific test for this disorder. This test may be useful not only in confirming the diagnosis of this disorder but also may provide information about its pathogenesis.     

Les thrombocytopénies induites par l’héparine : données récentes

Despite less frequent, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) remains a severe complication of treatment with heparin, and is important to diagnose and manage appropriately. HIT results from an atypical immune response to heparin, with the synthesis of IgG antibodies specific to heparin-modified platelet factor 4 (PF4) which activate platelets, leukocytes and the endothelium. This activation explains that low platelet count is associated with thrombotic events in 50% of patients. The diagnosis of HIT is sometimes evoked because of atypical manifestations (i.e. cutaneous necrosis, amnesia, hypotension or dyspnea following intravenous injection of heparin). Biological assays are always necessary to confirm HIT in case of clinical suspicion, and specific rapid tests are now available for detecting anti-PF4 antibodies. However, their specificity is poor and functional assays such as serotonin release assay or platelet aggregation test are often necessary. Argatroban that is a direct antithrombin drug can be used in patients with severe renal failure and will be preferred to danaparoid sodium in this situation. Fondaparinux is not licensed for treating confirmed HIT and can only be used in case of suspicion. The early detection of HIT is based on the monitoring of platelet count recommended in surgical patients receiving a low molecular weight heparin and in all patients treated with unfractionated heparin.     

Pitfalls in the diagnosis of heparin‐Induced thrombocytopenia: A 6‐year experience from a reference laboratory

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet‐activating antibodies against complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. The diagnosis of HIT is contingent on accurate and timely laboratory testing. Recently, alternative anticoagulants for the treatment of HIT have been introduced along with algorithms for better HIT diagnosis. However, the increased reliance on immunoassays for the diagnosis of HIT may have harmful consequences due to the high rate of false positive results. To compare trends and implications of current HIT testing approaches, we analyzed results over a six‐year period from the McMaster University Platelet Immunology Reference Laboratory. From 2008 to 2013, 8,546 samples were investigated for HIT using both an in‐house IgG‐specific anti‐PF4/heparin enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and the serotonin‐release assay (SRA). Of 8,546 samples tested, 13.4% were true‐positives (positive in both assays); 65.6% were true‐negatives (negative in both assays); 20.9% were presumed false positive for HIT (EIA‐positive/SRA‐negative); and 0.2% were EIA‐negative/SRA‐positive. The frequency of EIA‐positive/SRA‐negative results increased over time (from 12.9% in 2008 to 22.9% in 2013). We found that the number of SRA‐negative samples was reduced from referring centers that used an immunoassay as an initial screen; however, 41% of those samples tested negative in the immunoassay and in the SRA at the reference laboratory. The suspicion of HIT continues at a high rate and the agreement between the EIA and SRA test results remains problematic. Am. J. Hematol. 90:629–633, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: an improved method of detection based on lumi-aggregometry

Summary Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a recognized complication of heparin administration. Early detection of this syndrome is essential in the prevention of immune-mediated thromboembolic sequelae. The ¹⁴C-sero-tonin release assay (SRA) has been used in reference laboratories to identify sera from patients on heparin therapy capable of inducing platelet dense granule release. In an attempt to improve existing methodologies, we employed luminographic detection of platelet-dense granule ATP release as an endpoint of HIT antibody-mediated platelet activation. Sera tested included 10 SRA confirmed positive and five SRA confirmed negative samples (to establish the assay), five samples from patients with thrombocytopenia not on heparin therapy and 34 patients suspected of HIT syndrome. All SRA confirmed positive sera ( n = 19) were positive by the luminographic procedure. 24/26 SRA confirmed negative sera and five sera from thrombocytopenic patients not on heparin therapy were negative using luminography. Two of four sera yielding equivocal SRA results were found to be positive by the luminographic technique. The data suggest that the use of a lumi-aggregometer in the coagulation laboratory to detect HIT antibody-induced platelet activation is a reliable alternative to the SRA. The luminographic procedure is both rapid and sensitive, and does not require the use of biohazardous radio-isotopes.     

Determination of antiplatelet antibody activity in sera cytotoxic for human lymphocytes

Pooled serum aliquots obtained from sensitized potential renal allograft recipients on chronic hemodialysis were evaluated for their lymphocytotoxicity titers against the lymphocytes and then for alloantibodies against the platelets of 7 random donors by 5 methods. Platelet donor specific lymphocytotoxicity was present in 93% of 42 combinations. Of the positive combinations, 57% had a positive test for antiplatelet activity by the 14C serotonin release assay, 16% by the platelet aggregation method, and 19% as judged by acid phosphatase availability on the platelet membrane. No serum tested released beta-glucoronidase or lactic dehydrogenase. No correlation of the height of the titer of antiplatelet activity with that for lymphocytoxicity was detected. Thus, even in sera demonstrating significant activity against donor lymphocyte antigens, detection of associated platelet antibody activity is not uniform. Thus, a positive lymphocytoxic titer does not necessarily predict detectable antiplatelet activity. Therefore, additional tests for detection of antiplatelet activity should also be considered. This study shows that of the tests evaluated, the 14C serotonin release assay is the most sensitive for detection of antiplatelet antibodies.