Efficacy of combination antihypertensive therapy with low-dose indapamide: assessment by blood pressure self-monitoring at home

We examined the effects of the addition of low-dose indapamide to antihypertensive drugs of other classes, as well as its duration of action, using blood pressure (BP) self-monitoring at home. Seventy-six patients undergoing monotherapy with a calcium channel blocker (CCB), angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), or angiotensin AT1-receptor blocker (ARB), but had an average morning home systolic BP (SBP) > or =135 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) > or =85 mmHg, were studied. Indapamide (1 mg) was added to their existing treatment once daily for 4 weeks. The additional hypotensive effects of indapamide were evaluated by casual and home BPs, and the results were compared among the three groups of subjects classified according to their initial drug treatment classes. The morning/evening (M/E) ratio of BP reduction was calculated to assess the duration of the effect. Overall, indapamide significantly (P < 0.001) lowered morning home BP (147 +/- 12/87 +/- 9 mmHg to 135 +/- 12/81 +/- 9 mmHg), evening home BP (138 +/- 15/79 +/- 10 mmHg to 126 +/- 12/73 +/- 9 mmHg), and casual BP (145 +/- 21/86 +/- 14 mmHg to 136 +/- 17/81 +/- 13 mmHg). All groups showed significant indapamide-induced home SBP/DBP decreases, whereas only the ACEI and ARB groups, but not the CCB group, showed a home pulse pressure (PP) reduction. Evening SBP and PP decreases were significantly greater in the ARB group than in the CCB group. The mean M/E ratio with indapamide was 0.95 for SBP and 0.85 for DBP. Low-dose indapamide used in combination can provide additional anti-hypertensive efficacy lasting for 24 h. The added effect of indapamide may be more prominent on ARBs than on CCBs.     

Morning rise of blood pressure assessed by home blood pressure monitoring is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients receiving long-term antihypertensive medication.

To assess the influence of morning rise of systolic blood pressure (SBP) as assessed by home blood pressure monitoring on the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in relation to the blood pressure control status, we evaluated M-mode cardiac echocardiography in 626 hypertensive subjects (412 men and 214 women; mean age, 61.3+/-10.1 years) who were receiving antihypertensive medication. The subjects were requested to measure their blood pressure at home in the morning and evening over a 3-month period. They were distributed into the following four groups by the average (ME Ave) and the difference (ME Dif) of the morning and evening SBP. The well-controlled hypertensives with a morning rise of SBP (ME Ave<135 mmHg and ME Dif>or=10 mmHg; n=45; 7.2%) had a greater LVMI (122.9+/-22.7 vs. 92.7+/-15.6 g/m2, p<0.001) than the well-controlled hypertensives without a morning rise of SBP (ME Ave<135 mmHg and ME Dif<10 mmHg; n=367; 58.6%). The uncontrolled hypertensives with a morning rise of SBP (ME Ave>or=135 mmHg and ME Dif>or=10 mmHg; n=91; 14.5%) also had a greater LVMI (136.8+/-21.9 vs. 100.2+/-17.5 g/m2, p<0.001) than the uncontrolled hypertensives without a morning rise of SBP (ME Ave>or=135 mmHg and ME Dif<10 mmHg; n=123; 19.6%). A stepwise multivariate regression analysis revealed that the ME Dif was the most important factor related to the LVMI (r2=35.1% for all subjects, p<0001; r2=39.7% for men, p<0.001; and r2=18.7% for women, p<0.001). These results suggest that morning rise of blood pressure is an important factor influencing the development of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients on antihypertensive medication.     

Rate of morning increase in blood pressure is elevated in hypertensives

BACKGROUND: We applied a new logistic curve fitting procedure to ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) recordings to determine whether the rate of increase in systolic (SBP), mean (MBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR) in the morning is related to the level of BP in subjects. METHODS: The rate of transition in the morning and evening period was determined using a six-parameter double-logistic equation applied to 528 ABP recordings from a cardiovascular risk assessment clinic. Based on daytime BP (MBP, SBP, or DBP), the upper quartile (UQ, n = 132) and lower quartile (LQ) were compared. RESULTS: Subjects in the UQ of daytime MBP were hypertensive and showed greater day-night differences compared to normotensive subjects in the LQ (29 +/- 1 mm Hg for MBP compared to 20 +/- 1 mm Hg). The rate of morning increase in SBP and DBP was 42% and 30% greater in UQ subjects compared to the LQ subjects (P < .05). The rates of evening decrease in all BPs were 69% to 84% greater in the subjects in the UQ. Similar results were obtained if subjects were divided according to daytime SBP or DBP. The rate of morning increase in MBP was correlated with daytime BP, but not night-time or 24 h MBP. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of morning increase in BP is greater in those subjects with the highest daytime BP. The exaggerated rate of morning increase in BP in this group, which were all hypertensive, may also be important for greater cardiovascular risk.     

Is masked hypertension an artefact due to the blood pressure measurement method and threshold effects?

From results of office and home measurements of blood pressure (BP), patients can be classified as "hypertensive (HT)", "normotensive (NT)", "office hypertensive (OH)" or "masked hypertensive (MH)" by crossing the classifications obtained from each method. It seems that 9 to 20% of patients could be MH with a prognosis close to HT (SHEAF study). OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that at least one part of the prevalence of MH would be an artefact due to the difference between the methods of measurements (shygmomanometer vs semi-automatic device) and/or due to different definitions of office hypertension (OHT). To determine the impact of different definitions of OHT on the prevalence of MH. METHODS: During the course of a phase IV study, BP was measured with the same semi-automatic device (OMRON 705CP) both at doctor's office (3 measurements at 1-minute intervals) and at home, by the patient himself (3 measurements in the morning and in the evening at 1-minute intervals over the 7 days before the visit). Following definitions were used: Office HT: SBP > or =140 mmHg, DBP > or =90 mmHg, SBP > or =140 mmHg or DBP > or =90 mmHg; Home HT: SBP > or =135 mmHg, DBP> or =85 mmHg, SBP > or =135 mmHg or DBP > or =85 mmHg. Another definition of office HT was used SBP > or =135 mmHg, DBP > or =85 mmHg SBP > or =135 mmHg or DBP > or =85 mmHg. RESULTS: 575 patients were analysed. Results from the two methods of measurements are closed but significantly different (difference for SBP: 3.2 +/- 16.5 mmHg; p < 0.0001; difference for DBP: 1.4 +/- 10.3 mmHg; p = 0.002)     

Efficacy of Combination Antihypertensive Therapy with Low-Dose Indapamide: Assessment by Blood Pressure Self-Monitoring at Home

We examined the effects of the addition of low-dose indapamide to antihypertensive drugs of other classes, as well as its duration of action, using blood pressure (BP) self-monitoring at home. Seventy-six patients undergoing monotherapy with a calcium channel blocker (CCB), angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), or angiotensin AT₁-receptor blocker (ARB), but had an average morning home systolic BP (SBP) ≥ 135 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥ 85 mmHg, were studied. Indapamide (1 mg) was added to their existing treatment once daily for 4 weeks. The additional hypotensive effects of indapamide were evaluated by casual and home BPs, and the results were compared among the three groups of subjects classified according to their initial drug treatment classes. The morning/evening (M/E) ratio of BP reduction was calculated to assess the duration of the effect. Overall, indapamide significantly (P < 0.001) lowered morning home BP (147 ± 12/87 ± 9 mmHg to 135 ± 12/81 ± 9 mmHg), evening home BP (138 ± 15/79 ± 10 mmHg to 126 ± 12/73 ± 9 mmHg), and casual BP (145 ± 21/86 ± 14 mmHg to 136 ± 17/81 ± 13 mmHg). All groupsshowed significant indapamide-induced home SBP/DBP decreases, whereas only the ACEI and ARB groups, but not the CCB group, showed a home pulse pressure (PP) reduction. Evening SBP and PP decreases were significantly greater in the ARB group than in the CCB group. The mean M/E ratio with indapamide was 0.95 for SBP and 0.85 for DBP. Low-dose indapamide used in combination can provide additional anti-hypertensive efficacy lasting for 24 h. The added effect of indapamide may be more prominent on ARBs than on CCBs.     

Morning rise in blood pressure is a predictor of left ventricular hypertrophy in treated hypertensive patients.

To assess the relationship between home blood pressure and left ventricular mass, we evaluated cardiac echocardiography in 297 hypertensive subjects (188 men and 109 women; mean age, 62.8+/-10.3 years) who were treated with amlodipine monotherapy over 1 year (mean dose, 5.5+/-2.3 mg/day). The morning hypertension group (n=57; 19.2%), who had a morning home systolic blood pressure (HSBP) > or =135 mmHg and an evening HSBP <135 mmHg, had a significantly greater left ventricular mass index (LVMI) concomitant with an increase in the homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) compared to the good control group (n=174; 58.6%), whose morning and evening HSBP were both <135 mmHg, and had a LVMI roughly equivalent to that of the poor control group (n=63; 21.2%), whose morning and evening HSBP were both > or =135 mmHg. By grouping of subjects according to the difference between morning and evening HSBP (delta HSBP), subjects with a delta HSBP> or =10 mmHg had a significantly greater LVMI than subjects with a delta HSBP <10 mmHg. Increases in LVMI in these patients were still significant after adjustment for age, gender, dose of amlodipine, alcohol consumption, body mass index, office systolic blood pressure, and morning and evening HSBP. In a stepwise multivariate regression analysis, delta HSBP (r2=36.2%, p <0.001), morning HSBP (r2=5.5%, p <0.001), HOMA-IR (r2=1.4%, p=0.016) and age (r2=1.0%, p=0.026) were determined to be significant contributing factors for LVMI. This regression model could explain 44.1% of LVMI variability. These results suggest that morning rise in blood pressure is a dominant predictor of left ventricular hypertrophy.     

老老年人群动态血压参数与动脉僵硬度的相关性

目的探讨老老年人群动态血压参数与动脉僵硬度的相关性。方法筛选年龄≥80岁的老老年人238例,以血压≥160/95 mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)为标准,分为高血压组(134例)和对照组(104例),并进行臂-踝脉搏传导速度(baPWV)和24 h动态血压监测。用Pearson分析动态血压各参数与动脉僵硬度的相关性。结果高血压组baPWV高于对照组(P<0.05)。高血压组偶测收缩压,24 h、昼间和夜间收缩压、舒张压、脉压,收缩压负荷及舒张压负荷均高于对照组.夜间收缩压下降率、舒张压下降率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05,P<0.01)。baPWV与偶测血压;24 h收缩压、舒张压、脉压;昼间收缩压、舒张压、脉压、心率;夜间收缩压、舒张压、脉压;收缩压负荷、舒张压负荷呈正相关(P<0.05,P<0.01),而与夜间收缩压下降率呈负相关(P<0.01)。结论高血压是老老年人群动脉僵硬度增加的一个重要因素,动脉僵硬度与动态血压、脉压、心率及血压负荷相关。     

Assessement of home blood pressure with a monitor including MAM technology: comparison with the standard monitor

OBJECTIVES: To compare two periods of three days of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) using two different monitors with one including MAM (microlife average mode) technology. METHODS: In 152 hypertensive subjects referred to hypertension specialists, a self-measurement of blood pressure was performed sequentially with an Omron M6 (arm cuff, A/A, BHS validation) or Microlife BP-3AC1 with the MAM technology. Each patient recorded home blood pressure during two periods of 3 days with 3 measures in the morning and 3 in the evening. Order for use of each monitor was randomised. BP values were reported on a standardized document. RESULTS: In this population, aged 60 +/- 14 years, with 57% of men and a mean blood pressure of 150 +/- 21/84 +/- 21 mmHg, the home blood pressure values were 141.5 +/- 18.7/79.9 +/- 9.6 mmHg with the OMRON monitor and 138.2 +/- 17.1/79.9 +/- 10.1 mmHg with the Microlife monitor. Values between the two monitors differed about 5 mmHg for the mean SBP and about 2.8 mmHg for the mean DBP. The mean HBPM values does not differ between the two methods for more than 2.5 mmHg, 5 mmHg, 10 mmHg and 15 mmHg in 29%, 49%, 80% and 90% for SBP and in 42%, 76%, 94% and 98% for DBP respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For most of patients, mean SBP/DBP obtained with home blood pressure Measurement during three days are comparable when using monitor operated with MAM technology or not.     

Comparison between casual blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring parameters in healthy and hypertensive adolescents

Casual blood pressure measurements were compared with mean ambulatory blood pressure values during wakefulness and sleep in 45 normotensive and 30 hypertensive adolescents of both sexes aged 10-18 years. Two sets of auscultatory casual blood pressure were obtained, one in a pediatric office setting (office blood pressure), performed by the physician, and one in the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) unit, performed by a trained nurse, prior to the initiation of ABPM (pre-ABPM blood pressure). In normotensive and hypertensive subjects of both sexes, the mean office systolic blood pressure (SBP) was lower than the mean pre-ABPM SBP, and the mean office diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was lower than the mean pre-ABPM DBP. In normotensive participants, the mean pre-ABPM SBP/DBP was lower than the mean ABPM SBP/DBP while awake, the mean ABPM SBP/DBP during sleep being lower than the mean ABPM SBP/DBP values while awake and the mean pre-ABPM SBP/DBP. No statistical difference was demonstrated between the mean office SBP and the mean ABPM SBP during sleep, the mean ABPM DBP during sleep being lower than the mean office DBP. The hypertensive adolescents presented a blood pressure profile similar to that of the normotensive group, albeit shifted upwards, with no significant difference between the mean pre-ABPM SBP and the mean ABPM SBP while awake but a higher mean pre-ABPM DBP than mean ABPM DBP while awake. This study suggests that, by evaluating the casual blood pressure in different environment/observer situations, the power of casual blood pressure to predict inadequate blood pressure control, manifested as abnormal ABPM parameters, can be enhanced. Our data indicate ABPM to be the method of choice for the early diagnosis and adequate follow-up of adolescent hypertension.     

Blood pressure is linked to salt intake and modulated by the angiotensinogen gene in normotensive and hypertensive elderly subjects

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate salt sensitivity in elderly subjects with different forms of hypertension and controls and to investigate any modulation by genotype DESIGN: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled latin-square SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital PARTICIPANTS: Community subjects (n = 46) aged > or = 60 years classified as isolated systolic hypertension [ISH; systolic blood pressure (SBP) > or = 160, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 90 mmHg, n = 19], diastolic +/- systolic hypertension (SDH; DBP > or = 90 mmHg, n = 10) and normotension (SBP < 160, DBP < 90 mmHg, n = 17). INTERVENTION: Four 14 day treatments, 50, 100, 200 and 300 mmol/day of sodium chloride supplementation interspersed with 14 day washout periods on a salt-restricted diet. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 24 h blood pressure, heart rate, weight, urinary sodium and creatinine clearance measured during baseline, treatment and washout periods and angiotensinogen (AGT) and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) genotypes. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, the mean +/- standard error (SE) of change from baseline in SBP for 50, 100, 200 and 300 mmol/day salt was 7.7+/-2.4, 12.1+/-2.4, 16.6+/-3.0, 18.5+/-2.6 mmHg, respectively. For DBP, the respective changes were: -0.1+/-1.5, 2.4+/-1.6, 3.0+/-1.5, 5.8+/-1.7 mmHg. The increase in SBP among ISH subjects was significantly higher than among subjects in the SDH and normotensive groups (P < 0.05). AGT genotype influenced the effect of salt dose on the change in DBP (P = 0.006) but not SBP (P = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: In healthy, older subjects, a linear increase in BP occurred with increasing salt dose, it appeared most pronounced in ISH subjects and could be modulated by AGT genotype.     

Variation in cuff blood pressure in untreated urban outpatients with mild hypertension in Harare, Zimbabwe--implications for the diagnosis of hypertension

Duplicate measurements of BP were recorded at six visits in 32 male urban factory workers found to have raised BP (systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than or equal to 160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater than or equal to 90 mmHg) at the initial visit). A systematic decrease in both SBP and DBP occurred over the first three visits. The BP at visits 4-6 was not significantly different. Most of the decrease in BP occurred between the first and second visit (mean SBP decreased 8.5 mmHg and mean DBP decreased 11.1 mmHg). After 6 visits 66% of subjects could be classified into clear clinical groups (normotensive 53.5%, hypertensive 12.5%) but in 34% the variation in cuff BP precluded classification. In these subjects prolonged observation or home BP monitoring may be required before initiating lifelong treatment.     

Blood pressures at work, home and during sleep in patients with essential hypertension: analysis by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure (BP) recordings were obtained every 30 min using a noninvasive ambulatory BP recorder during 24 hours in 93 subjects with hypertension. Recordings were analyzed in four different situations: (1) annual check up at the health service center, (2) at work, (3) at home, and (4) during sleep. Subjects with BP higher than 160/95 mmHg in any of the three situations were defined as established hypertensive (n = 36); Subjects with 140-159/90-94 mmHg, as the borderline hypertensive (n = 32); and subjects with BP lower than 139/89 mmHg, as the normotensive (n = 25). Four successive systolic and diastolic BP values were averaged and served as 24-hour BP patterns. Systolic BP over 140 mmHg, diastolic BP over 90 mmHg and mean BP over 107 mmHg were defined as a s-hyperbaric index (s-HBI), d-HBI and m-HBI, respectively. The normotensive group showed a marked decrease of BP after recordings explained by the "white coat phenomenon". The 24-hour recordings in all the three groups showed the highest BP at work and the lowest during sleep. The situational BP changes were generally similar, but the established hypertensive group showed larger BP differences between work and home (SBP 8.8 +/- 9.0 mmHg, 7.8 +/- 8.3 mmHg). For differentiating the three groups, the hyperbaric index was better than the 24-hour average BP. The average home BP showed a good correlation with the 24-hour average BP [SBP: r = 0.94 (p less than 0.01), DBP: r = 0.85 (p less than 0.01)]. Especially, BPs recorded before sleep predicted well the 24-hour average BP. An average of multiple BP measurements before sleep is thought to represent a 24-hour average BP more closely than a conventionally used single recording at home or after awakening.     

Increased plasma 8-isoprostane levels in hypertensive subjects: the Tsurugaya Project.

To examine the relationship between 8-isoprostane and blood pressure, we measured plasma 8-isoprostane concentration and home blood pressure levels in an elderly Japanese population. Our study population comprised 569 subjects aged 70 years and over who were not receiving antihypertensive medication. On the basis of their blood pressure values, the participants were classified into three groups: normotensive (home blood pressure <135/85 mmHg), hypertensive (home blood pressure 135/85-160/90 mmHg), and severely hypertensive (home blood pressure > or =160/90 mmHg). The mean plasma 8-isoprostane level in the severely hypertensive group (21.1+/-5.2 pg/ml) was significantly higher than that in the normotensive (20.2+/-4.9 pg/ml) or hypertensive (19.7+/-5.1 pg/ml) group, and this result was unchanged when we adjusted for possible confounding factors such as age, sex, use of vitamin A, C or E supplements, smoking status, drinking status, body mass index, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, history of diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, home heart rate and serum creatinine level. Thus, the level of plasma 8-isoprostane appears to be elevated in older subjects with severe hypertension.     

老年轻中度原发性高血压患者家庭自测血压变异与冷加压试验的相关性

目的探讨老年轻中度原发性高血压患者家庭自测血压变异与冷加压试验的相关性。方法于2012年5月~2013年8月自山东省临沂市兰山区高血压社区管理的高血压患者中,筛选老年轻中度原发性高血压患者259例,所有入选受试者均进行7d家庭血压自测,计算后6d连续的收缩压及舒张压变异性相关指标及平均心率;采用冷加压试验以刺激全身交感神经兴奋,并将冷加压试验阳性作为阳性组116例,冷加压试验阴性作为阴性组143例。结果阳性组早间舒张压、收缩压标准差、舒张压标准差、最高收缩压、最高舒张压、早-晚收缩压差、早-晚舒张压差、最高-最低收缩压差、最高-最低舒张压差,平均心率均高于阴性组(P<0.05)。阳性组晚间收缩压、晚间舒张压低于阴性组(P<0.05)。回归分析显示,即刻及60s收缩压变化幅度始终是影响收缩压标准差、舒张压标准差、早-晚收缩压差、早-晚舒张压差、最高-最低收缩压差及最高-最低舒张压差的主要因素。结论老年轻中度原发性高血压患者的家庭自测血压变异与冷加压试验反应相关,冷加压试验反应越强,血压变异越大。     

Prevalence of sustained hypertension and obesity in urban and rural school going children in Ludhiana

BACKGROUND: Increasing trend of hypertension is a worldwide phenomenon. The data on sustained hypertension in school going children is scanty in India. The present study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of sustained hypertension and obesity in apparently healthy school children in rural and urban areas of Ludhiana using standard criteria. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2467 apparently healthy adolescent school children aged between 11-17 years from urban area and 859 students from rural area were taken as subjects. Out of total 3326 students, 189 were found to have sustained hypertension; in urban areas prevalence of sustained hypertension was 6.69% (n=165) and in rural area it was 2.56% (n=24). Males outnumbered females in both rural and urban areas. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure of hypertensive population in both urban and rural population was significantly higher than systolic and diastolic blood pressure in their normotensive counterparts (urban normotensive systolic blood pressure:115.48+/-22.74 mmHg, urban hypertensive systolic blood pressure: 137.59+/-11.91 mmHg, rural normotensive systolic blood pressure: 106.31+/-19.86 mmHg, rural hypertensive systolic blood pressure: 131.63+/-10.13 mmHg, urban normotensive diastolic blood pressure: 74.18+/-17.41 mmHg, urban hypertensive diastolic blood pressure: 84.58+/-8.14 mmHg, rural normotensive diastolic blood pressure: 68.84+/-16.96 mmHg, rural hypertensive diastolic blood pressure: 79.15+/-7.41 mmHg). Overweight populationwas significantly higher in urban area. There were 287 (11.63%) overweight students and 58 (2.35%) were obese. In rural population overweight and obese students were 44 (4.7%) and 34 (3.63%) respectively. There was significant increase in prevalence of hypertension in both rural and urban population with increased body mass index in urban students; those with normal body mass index had prevalence of hypertension of 4.52% (n=96), in overweight it was 15.33% (n=44) and in obese it was 43.10% (n=25). In rural area, the overweight students showed prevalence of sustained hypertension in 6.82% (n=3) and in obese group it was 61.76% (n=21). None of the student with normal body mass index in rural area was found to be hypertensive. The mean body mass index of hypertensive population in both rural and urban areas was significantly higher than respective normotensive population (mean body mass index in urban normotensive group: 20.34+/-3.72 kg/m2, hypertensive group: 24.91+/-4.92 kg/m2; mean body mass index in rural normotensive group: 18.41+/-3.41 kg/m2, hypertensive group: 21.37+/-3.71 kg/m2, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of sustained hypertension is on the rise in urban area even in younger age groups. Blood pressure is frequently elevated in obese children as compared to lean subjects. This is possibly related to their sedentary lifestyle, altered eating habits, increased fat content of diet and decreased physical activities.     

Self-measured systolic blood pressure in the morning is a strong indicator of decline of renal function in hypertensive patients with non-diabetic chronic renal insufficiency

While blood pressure is a recognized major determinant of renal function deterioration, the role of self blood pressure measurement (BPM) in predicting the loss of renal function in hypertensive patients with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) has not been adequately addressed. One hundred and thirteen patients (F/M: 46/67; 56 +/- 1 years) with CRI (mean serum creatinine: 1.87 +/- 0.08; range: 1.4 to 3.5 mg/dl; average urinary protein excretion: 1.2 +/- 0.2 g/24 hrs.) were followed for 3 years. The record of renal biopsy revealed that 74 patients had IgA nephropathy, 16 had chronic glomerulonephritis, and 6 had membranous nephropathy, while 17, unbiopsied patients had underlying renal disease of unknown origin. Self BPM were made at regular intervals throughout the course of the study. All recorded blood pressures were included in a stepwise multiple regression analysis in which the decline in GFR per year was the dependent variable. Patients were primarily treated with a combination of amlodipine (5 to 20 mg daily), a calcium antagonist, and benazepril (2.5 to 5 mg daily), an ACE inhibitor in an effort to reduce their blood pressure at the office to < 130/85 mmHg. The simple correlation between blood pressures (i.e., office, home morning and home evening) and the decline in GFR were all statistically significant. The correlation coefficients of determination for this model were as follows: r = 0.64 for home morning SBP; 0.43 for office SBP; 0.39 for office DBP; and 0.38 for home morning DBP. The level of urinary protein excretion did not correlate with the decline in GFR. These data suggest that self BPM improves prognostic ability in hypertensive patients with CRI.     

Relationship of baroreflex sensitivity and blood pressure in an older population

OBJECTIVES: Ageing and hypertension are associated with reduced baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) in young and middle-aged populations. The effects of blood pressure level on BRS in the older population are unclear. We examined the association between blood pressure and BRS in older persons with blood pressure below 180 mmHg. METHODS: BRS, high (alphaHF 0.15-0.4 Hz) and low (alphaLF 0.04-0.15 Hz) frequency alpha-index, was determined in 75 normotensive subjects (aged 75 +/- 4 years, 41% female, 131 +/- 10/74 +/- 7 mmHg) and 64 untreated hypertensive subjects (aged 76 +/- 5 years, 48% female, 165 +/- 7/ 88 +/- 7 mmHg) by spectral analysis of 20 min continuous blood pressure and heart rate recordings using finger plethysmography. Subjects were recruited from 10 general practices and were taking no cardiovascular medications. RESULTS: High but not low frequency alpha-index was significantly blunted in hypertensive subjects (alphaHF 5.1 +/- 3.1 versus 8.4 +/- 7.4 ms/mmHg, P< 0.001 and alphaLF 4.7 +/- 3.0 versus 5.8 +/- 3.9 ms/mmHg, P= 0.07). Multivariate analysis of the relationship between age and blood pressure demonstrated systolic and to a lesser extent diastolic blood pressure were significant predictors of variance in BRS for alphaHF [systolic blood pressure (SBP) P< 0.0001, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) P< 0.05, r2 = 0.1] and alphaLF (SBP P=0.01, DBP P<0.05, r2 = 0.04). Age was not a significant predictor for either measure, in the 20 year range studied. CONCLUSIONS: In an older population blood pressure is associated with reduced BRS, particularly for the high frequency component. Such a change may place older subjects with hypertension at increased risk of orthostatic hypotension, vasovagal syncope and sudden cardiac death.     

厄贝沙坦不同时间用药对血压昼夜节律的影响研究

目的按照时间药物学的原则,探讨不同用药时间服用厄贝沙坦对非杓型高血压患者血压昼夜节律的影响。方法采用动态血压检测的方法筛选出83例非杓型高血压患者,随机分为厄贝沙坦晨起服药组（41例）和晚上服药组（42例）,均给以厄贝沙坦150～300mg口服,1次/d,共治疗24周。药物治疗前后分别进行诊室血压和动态血压监测的检查。结果两组的诊室收缩压（SBP）在治疗后均明显降低,两组的诊室收缩压（SBP）在治疗前后差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。动态血压结果显示,两组均能降低夜间SBP（P〈0.05,P〈0.01）,夜间服药更能有效地降低夜间的SBP。晨起服药组的白天血压达标率（SBP〈135mmHg）为36.5%,晚上服药组的白天血压达标率为33.3%,差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。晨起服药组的夜间血压达标率（SBP〈125mmHg）为29.2%,晚上服药组的夜间血压达标率为61.9%,差异有显著意义（P〈0.01）。晨起服药组血压昼夜节律纠正率为19.5%,晚上服药组血压昼夜节律纠正率为52.4%,差异有显著意义（P〈0.01）。结论对于非杓型高血压患者,厄贝沙坦晚上服药可以有效地纠正夜间的高负荷血压,提高夜间血压达标率,改善血压昼夜节律。     

High morning home blood pressure is associated with a loss of functional independence in the community-dwelling elderly aged 75 years or older.

To elucidate the relationship between home systolic blood pressure (SBP) and functional impairment in the elderly 75 years or older, 461 community-dwelling subjects (192 men, 269 women, mean age: 80 years) were studied. Home blood pressure was measured twice in the morning and twice in the evening for 5 consecutive days with an automatic cuff-oscillometric device. Total/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and several functional assessments were evaluated. A subject was determined to exhibit a loss of independence according to the activities of daily living (ADL) score in a study conducted in 2001. Based on the mean home SBPs (mSBP) and morning-evening SBP differences (dSBP), the subjects were classified into 4 groups as follows: hypertensive/morning-dominant (HM; mSBP > or = 135 mmHg, dSBP > or = 15 mmHg), hypertensive/sustained (HS; mSBP > or = 135 mmHg, dSBP<15 mmHg), normotensive/morning-dominant (NM; mSBP<135 mmHg, dSBP > or = 15 mmHg), and normotensive/controlled (NC; mSBP<135 mmHg, dSBP<15 mmHg). There were no differences in sex, cholesterol levels, history of stroke, other cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), and cognitive function, but there were significant differences in age, antihypertensive medications, the neurobehavioral test scores, and ADL scores. There were no significant differences in terms of mortality and CVD events. In the survivors, HM and HS were independent risk factors for a loss of independence, after adjustments were made for onset of stroke, age, antihypertensive therapy, history of CVD, as well as neurobehavioral test scores and ADL scores (odds ratio [OR]: 12.2 and 3.78, respectively). After the same adjustments as those mentioned above were made, HM and HS were found to be negative determinants of survival and maintenance of independence (OR: 0.082, 0.270, respectively). In conclusion, high home SBP (> or = 135 mmHg) and high dSBP (> or = 15 mmHg) were found to be important in determining the levels of disability for the very elderly.     

Which measurement of home blood pressure should be used for clinical evaluation when multiple measurements are made?

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated which home blood pressure (BP) measurement was most useful in clinical evaluation when we measured it three times per sitting. METHODS: Home BP measurements in the morning and evening were performed for 7 days in 572 volunteers (384 men, 188 women, mean age 41.2 years) in 2002 (period 1) and 2003 (period 2). Five sets of measurements were analyzed: A, mean of the first; B, mean of the second; C, mean of the first and second; D, mean of the second and third; and E, mean of all measurements. By analyzing BP in five sets in both periods, their reproducibility was examined. RESULTS: For all five sets of measurements, little difference was found when BP readings were compared between both periods [the differences were -0.6 +/- 6.7 to -0.4 +/- 7.0 mmHg for morning systolic BP (SBP), 0 +/- 4.9 to 0.3 +/- 5.0 mmHg for morning diastolic BP (DBP), -0.1 +/- 7.1 to 0.1 +/- 7.0 mmHg for evening SBP, and 0.1 +/- 5.3 to 0.4 +/- 5.4 mmHg for evening DBP]. Furthermore, BP readings between both periods correlated well; the correlation coefficients were 0.90-0.92 for morning BP and 0.86-0.89 for evening BP. In addition, the concordance rates of three BP categories (normotension, borderline and hypertension) were excellent using morning home BP (kappa coefficient 0.64-0.68) in all five sets, and higher than those using evening home BP (0.52-0.57). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that even one measurement on each occasion is as useful as several measurements when 7 consecutive days of home BP measurements are used for clinical evaluation.