Molecular and biochemical pharmacology of the histamine H4 receptor

The elucidation of the human genome has had a major impact on histamine receptor research. The identification of the human H₄ receptor by several groups has been instrumental for a new appreciation of the role of histamine in the modulation of immune function. In this review, we summarize the historical developments and the molecular and biochemical pharmacology of the H₄ receptor.     

Molecular cloning of monkey histamine H4 receptor

Histamine H(4) receptor is considered as a novel therapeutic target for allergic diseases. To enhance the knowledge about species difference, which is essential for drug discovery research, monkey H(4) receptor was identified. Monkey H(4) receptor was characterized to have comparable similarity with its human counterpart. Discovery of monkey H(4) receptor will contribute to a better interpretation of effective drug discovery.     

Molecular determinants of steroid inhibition for the mouse constitutive androstane receptor

The constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) regulates drug and steroid metabolism through binding to cytochrome P450 2B, 2C, and 3A gene enhancers. Uniquely among nuclear receptors, mouse CAR (mCAR) can be suppressed by androstenol and activated by structurally diverse drugs, pesticides, and environmental pollutants. To gain insight into presently ill-defined structural requirements of mCAR ligands, we employed a mCAR inhibition assay in mammalian HEK293 cells to create a QSAR model that could well predict the inhibition by three unknown steroids. Two novel mCAR inhibitors were thus identified. Yeast two-hybrid assays indicated that steroids inhibit mCAR primarily by promoting association of mCAR with the corepressor NCoR, with only minor contribution from other mechanisms. Analysis of chimeric and mutant mCAR constructs suggested that androstenol sensitivity is controlled by residues between amino acids 201-263 (helices 5-7) and it does not depend on the residue 350 within helix 12, as previously suggested.     

Cloning and functional expression of the human histamine H3 receptor.

Histamine regulates neurotransmitter release in the central and peripheral nervous systems through H3 presynaptic receptors. The existence of the histamine H3 receptor was demonstrated pharmacologically 15 years ago, yet despite intensive efforts, its molecular identity has remained elusive. As part of a directed effort to discover novel G protein-coupled receptors through homology searching of expressed sequence tag databases, we identified a partial clone (GPCR97) that had significant homology to biogenic amine receptors. The GPCR97 clone was used to probe a human thalamus library, which resulted in the isolation of a full-length clone encoding a putative G protein-coupled receptor. Homology analysis showed the highest similarity to M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors and overall low homology to all other biogenic amine receptors. Transfection of GPCR97 into a variety of cell lines conferred an ability to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation in response to histamine, but not to acetylcholine or any other biogenic amine. Subsequent analysis revealed a pharmacological profile practically indistinguishable from that for the histamine H3 receptor. In situ hybridization in rat brain revealed high levels of mRNA in all neuronal systems (such as the cerebral cortex, the thalamus, and the caudate nucleus) previously associated with H3 receptor function. Its widespread and abundant neuronal expression in the brain highlights the significance of histamine as a general neurotransmitter modulator. The availability of the human H3 receptor cDNA should greatly aid in the development of chemical and biological reagents, allowing a greater appreciation of the role of histamine in brain function.     

Molecular aspects of the histamine H3 receptor

The cloning of the histamine H(3) receptor (H(3)R) cDNA in 1999 by Lovenberg et al. [10] allowed detailed studies of its molecular aspects and indicated that the H(3)R can activate several signal transduction pathways including G(i/o)-dependent inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, activation of phospholipase A(2), Akt and the mitogen activated kinase as well as the inhibition of the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger and inhibition of K(+)-induced Ca(2+) mobilization. Moreover, cloning of the H(3)R has led to the discovery several H(3)R isoforms generated through alternative splicing of the H(3)R mRNA. The H(3)R has gained the interest of many pharmaceutical companies as a potential drug target for the treatment of various important disorders like obesity, myocardial ischemia, migraine, inflammatory diseases and several CNS disorders like Alzheimer's disease, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and schizophrenia. In this paper, we review various molecular aspects of the hH(3)R including its signal transduction, dimerization and the occurrence of different H(3)R isoforms.     

Molecular modeling and site-specific mutagenesis of the histamine-binding site of the histamine H4 receptor

The histamine H4 receptor is a novel G-protein-coupled receptor with a unique pharmacological profile. The distribution of H4 mRNA suggests that it may play a role in the regulation of immune function, particularly with respect to allergy and asthma. To define the histamine-binding site of this receptor, molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis were used to predict and alter amino acids residing in the histamine-binding pocket. The effects of these alterations on histamine binding and receptor activation were then assessed. Our results indicate that Asp94 (3.32) in transmembrane region (TM) 3 and Glu182 (5.46) in TM5 are critically involved in histamine binding. Asp94 probably serves as a counter-anion to the cationic amino group of histamine, whereas Glu182 (5.46) interacts with the N(tau) nitrogen atom of the histamine imidazole ring via an ion pair. In contrast, Thr178 (5.42) and Ser179 (5.43) in TM5 are not significantly involved in either histamine binding or receptor activation. These results resemble those for the analogous residues in the H1 histamine receptor but contrast with findings regarding the H2 histamine receptor. Our results also demonstrate that Asn147 (4.57) in TM4 and Ser320 (6.52) in TM6 play a role in receptor activation but are not involved in histamine binding. Taken together, these data indicate that although histamine seems to bind to the H4 receptor in a fashion similar to that predicted for the other histamine receptor subtypes, there are also important differences that can probably be exploited for the discovery of novel H4-selective compounds.     

Constitutive activity of the histamine H3 receptor

Constitutive activity has been mainly recorded for numerous overexpressed and/or mutated receptors. The histamine H(3) receptor (H(3)R) is a target of choice to study the physiological relevance of this process. In rodent brain, postsynaptic H(3)Rs show high constitutive activity, and presynaptic H(3) autoreceptors that show constitutive activity have a predominant role in inhibiting the activity of histamine neurons. H(3)R inverse agonists abrogate this constitutive brake and enhance histamine release in vivo. Some of these inverse agonists have entered clinical trials for the treatment of cognitive and food intake disorders. Studies performed in vitro and in vivo with proxyfan show that this H(3)R ligand is a 'protean agonist' - that is, a ligand with a spectrum of activity ranging from full agonism to full inverse agonism depending on the level of H(3)R constitutive activity. Consistent with its physiological and therapeutic relevance, the constitutive activity of H(3)R thus has a major function in the brain and regulates the activity of H(3)R-targeted drugs.     

The histamine H4 receptor and potential therapeutic uses for H4 ligands

Histamine is a biogenic amine that plays a host of physiological roles and the three major functions for histamine have been largely defined by the activity of three receptors. The inflammatory wheal and flare response is driven by the H1 receptor [1]. The H2 receptor controls gastric acid secretion in the gut [2]. The H3 receptor is involved in neurotransmitter release in the central nervous system [3]. The recent discovery of the histamine H4 receptor by several groups has lead to the re-evaluation of the physiological role for histamine.     

Profiling of histamine H4 receptor agonists in native human monocytes

Background and Purpose

Since the identification of the histamine H₄ receptor, several ligands activating this receptor have been described and more compounds are in development. These ligands are well characterized in pharmacological assays, including radioligand competition binding studies, GTPγS and GTPase assays. In most cases, these experiments are performed in transfected cell lines, expressing unnaturally high levels of target receptors and G-protein signalling components. In this study we investigated the specific properties of H₄ receptor ligands in native cells.

Experimental Approach

Histamine and five different H₄ receptor agonists – 4-methylhistamine, UR-PI376, clobenpropit, VUF8430 and ST-1006 – were characterized in freshly isolated human monocytes. The ligands (10 nM–10 μM) were tested as inhibitors of IL-12p70 secretion from human monocytes and the effects of the H₂ receptor antagonist ranitidine and the H₄ receptor antagonist JNJ7777120 on their action was investigated.

Key Results

Histamine and all the tested agonists reduced IL-12p70 secretion into monocyte supernatants by 40–70%. The potencies varied with pEC₅₀ values ranging from 5.7 to 6.9, depending on the agonist used. All potencies were lower than those determined in the original investigations of the compounds. Pretreatment of monocytes with H₂ or H₄ receptor antagonists showed that some H₄ receptor ligands also had low activity at the H₂ receptor.

Conclusions and Implications

Our study demonstrates discrepancies between the potencies obtained from assays in transfected cell lines and assays in native human cells, indicating the importance of evaluating H₄ receptor ligands in native cells.

Linked Articles

This article is part of a themed issue on Histamine Pharmacology Update. To view the other articles in this issue visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2013.170.issue-1     

Molecular determinants for the agonist activity of 2-methylhistamine and 4-methylhistamine at H2-receptors

A model for drug action at the histamine H2-receptor has been evaluated computationally for the agonists 2- and 4-methylhistamine. Based on molecular properties calculated for molecular structures optimized with ab initio quantum mechanical methods, the activities of these compounds and their potencies relative to histamine are found to be explained by the previously proposed model. Recognized in the N3-H tautomeric form of their monocations, both compounds exhibit a change in ring tautomeric preference when the cationic side chain is neutralized. This change makes possible their participation in a proposed proton relay event that was postulated to initiate the receptor response of H2-agonists. The relative concentrations of the mono- and dication forms of the molecules in equimolar concentrations of histamine and the two derivatives are calculated from the values of the molecular electrostatic potentials at the ring protonation sites. Because the monocation is the species recognized at the H2-receptor, the reduced potency of 2-methylhistamine relative to histamine and to the 4-methyl derivative is explained by the finding that 2-methylhistamine will have the lowest concentration of the recognized species. The rank order of potencies obtained from the ratio of monocationic species of the molecules is in agreement with experimental results.     

Structure-activity studies on a series of a 2-aminopyrimidine-containing histamine H4 receptor ligands

A series of 2-aminopyrimidines was synthesized as ligands of the histamine H4 receptor (H4R). Working in part from a pyrimidine hit that was identified in an HTS campaign, SAR studies were carried out to optimize the potency, which led to compound 3, 4- tert-butyl-6-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)pyrimidin-2-ylamine. We further studied this compound by systematically modifying the core pyrimidine moiety, the methylpiperazine at position 4, the NH2 at position 2, and positions 5 and 6 of the pyrimidine ring. The pyrimidine 6 position benefited the most from this optimization, especially in analogs in which the 6- tert-butyl was replaced with aromatic and secondary amine moieties. The highlight of the optimization campaign was compound 4, 4-[2-amino-6-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)pyrimidin-4-yl]benzonitrile, which was potent in vitro and was active as an anti-inflammatory agent in an animal model and had antinociceptive activity in a pain model, which supports the potential of H 4R antagonists in pain.     

Molecular determinants of ligand binding modes in the histamine H(4) receptor: linking ligand-based three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) models to in silico guided receptor mutagenesis studies

The histamine H(4) receptor (H(4)R) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that plays an important role in inflammation. Similar to the homologous histamine H(3) receptor (H(3)R), two acidic residues in the H(4)R binding pocket, D(3.32) and E(5.46), act as essential hydrogen bond acceptors of positively ionizable hydrogen bond donors in H(4)R ligands. Given the symmetric distribution of these complementary pharmacophore features in H(4)R and its ligands, different alternative ligand binding mode hypotheses have been proposed. The current study focuses on the elucidation of the molecular determinants of H(4)R-ligand binding modes by combining (3D) quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR), protein homology modeling, molecular dynamics simulations, and site-directed mutagenesis studies. We have designed and synthesized a series of clobenpropit (N-(4-chlorobenzyl)-S-[3-(4(5)-imidazolyl)propyl]isothiourea) derivatives to investigate H(4)R-ligand interactions and ligand binding orientations. Interestingly, our studies indicate that clobenpropit (2) itself can bind to H(4)R in two distinct binding modes, while the addition of a cyclohexyl group to the clobenpropit isothiourea moiety allows VUF5228 (5) to adopt only one specific binding mode in the H(4)R binding pocket. Our ligand-steered, experimentally supported protein modeling method gives new insights into ligand recognition by H(4)R and can be used as a general approach to elucidate the structure of protein-ligand complexes.     

A chemical switch for the modulation of the functional activity of higher homologues of histamine on the human histamine H3 receptor: effect of various substitutions at the primary amino function

In an effort to establish the structural requirements for agonism, neutral antagonism, and inverse agonism at the human histamine H(3) receptor (H(3)R) we have prepared a series of higher homologues of histamine in which the terminal nitrogen of the side chain has been either mono- or disubstituted with several aliphatic, alicyclic, and aromatic moieties or incorporated in cyclic systems. The novel ligands have been pharmacologically investigated in vitro for their affinities on the human H(3)R and H(4)R subtypes by radioligand displacement experiments and for their intrinsic H(3)R activities via a CRE-mediated beta-galactosidase reporter gene assay. Subtle changes of the substitution pattern at the side chain nitrogen alter enormously the pharmacological activity of the ligands, resulting in a series of compounds with a wide spectrum of pharmacological activities. Among the several neutral H(3)R antagonists identified within this series, compounds 2b and 2h display an H(3)R affinity in the low nanomolar concentration range (pK(i) values of 8.1 and 8.4, respectively). A very potent and selective H(3)R agonist (1l, pEC(50) = 8.9, alpha = 0.94) and a very potent, though not highly selective, H(3)R inverse agonist (2k, pIC(50) = 8.9, alpha = -0.97) have been identified as well.     

Incomplete activation of human eosinophils via the histamine H4-receptor: evidence for ligand-specific receptor conformations

Eosinophils play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases. Histamine activates eosinophils via the H(4)-receptor (H(4)R). However, pharmacological analysis of the H(4)R in eosinophils is still incomplete, and cell purity is a problem. The H(4)R antagonist 1-[(5-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)carbonyl]-4-methylpiperazine (JNJ7777120) has recently been reported to exhibit paradoxical stimulatory effects in some systems. Therefore, the first aim of our study was to pharmacologically re-examine H(x)R subtypes on human eosinophils using a highly purified preparation (97±2%). The second aim was to compare the effects of histamine with those induced by well-known activators of eosinophil functions, i.e. eotaxin-1 and formyl peptides. Histamine and the H(4)R-selective agonist 2-cyano-1-[4-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)butyl]-3-[(2-phenylthio)ethyl]guanidine (UR-PI376) increased intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) and activated chemotaxis. JNJ7777120 per se exhibited no stimulatory effects but inhibited stimulation by histamine and UR-PI376. Blockade of the H(2)R by famotidine enhanced histamine-induced chemotaxis but not rises in [Ca(2+)](i). Compared to eotaxin and formyl peptides, the effect of histamine on eosinophil chemotaxis was only small. Formyl peptides but not histamine activated reactive oxygen species formation and release of eosinophil peroxidase. In conclusion, histamine is only an incomplete eosinophil activator with the H(2)R blunting the small chemotactic response to H(4)R activation. We also noted several differences in potencies of histamine, UR-PI376 and JNJ7777120 in calcium and chemotaxis assays and when compared to results in the literature. This indicates functional selectivity of H(4)R ligands, thus ligand-specific stabilization of distinct receptor conformations, inducing distinct biological responses.     

The first potent and selective non-imidazole human histamine H4 receptor antagonists

Following the discovery of the human histamine H4 receptor, a high throughput screen of our corporate compound collection identified compound 6 as a potential lead. Investigation of the SAR resulted in the discovery of novel compounds 10e and 10l, which are the first potent and selective histamine H4 receptor antagonists to be described.     

Identification and characterization of histamine H4 receptor

Recently, we and other groups have identified cDNA encoding the novel histamine H4 receptor. All of the groups have initially found a clue for the H4 receptor-nucleotides sequence in the human draft genomic DNA database. The primary structure of H4 receptor reveals the highest homology with H3 receptor among known G-protein coupled receptors (37.4%). H4 receptor binds to histamine with high affinity, which results in the down-regulation of intracellular cAMP level. H4 receptor is activated not only by histamine, but also R-(alpha)-methylhistamine (H3 receptor agonist), clobenpropit (H3 receptor antagonist), clozapine (neuroleptic) and other histaminergic compounds, while it is antagonized by thioperamide (H3 receptor antagonist). The H4 receptor is localized in the peripheral blood leukocytes, spleen, thymus, small intestine, colon, bone marrow and so on. The tissue distribution of the H4 receptor and known physiological function of histamine tempts us to speculate about its function as an immune modulator. Although there needs much additional work on characterization of the H4 receptor, the discovery of this receptor subtype will unveil a new phase for determining the physiological role of histamine.     

Receptor-specific functional efficacies of alkyl imidazoles as dual histamine H3/H4 receptor ligands

Histamine H₃ and H₄ receptors are highly related G protein-coupled receptors. Preclinical and clinical data strongly suggest the potential therapeutic application of selectively acting histamine H₄ receptor ligands to inflammatory conditions but also hint at a certain interference of the two receptors in diseases attended with itch and pain. The aim of this investigation was to identify dual acting ligands as pharmacological tools. Receptor binding profiles of ω-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)alkyl derivatives structurally defined as amides, carbamates, esters, ethers, ketones and ureas were evaluated with respect to their potencies at histamine H₃ and H₄ receptors. A two-step screening method based on in vitro radioligand binding studies and functional [³⁵S]GTPγS binding experiments was performed. The examined series of imidazole-containing compounds displayed both, selective histamine H₄ receptor and dual acting histamine H₃/H₄ receptor ligands. Slight structural modifications caused major differences in selectivity profiles and on functional properties at the human histamine H₄ receptor. N-(3-(1H-Imidazol-4-yl)propyl)-2-cyclohexylacetamide 11 was identified as most potent and selective human histamine H₄ receptor ligand in this series (K_i = 45 nM). Amide- and ether-containing structures consistently exhibited partial agonist efficacies, whereas ureas, ketones, esters and carbamates mainly acted as antagonists and inverse agonists. We identified novel dual acting histamine H₃/H₄ receptor ligands with varying efficacies at the histamine H₄ receptor subtype, whereas histamine H₃ receptor antagonism was kept constant, e.g. 3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propyl (cyclohexylmethyl)carbamate 19 or 4-(3-(3-phenylpropylthio)propyl)-1H-imidazole 30. These compounds state valuable pharmacological tools in studies of diseases, in which histamine H₃ and H₄ receptor signalling contributes to pathophysiological conditions.     

Comparative study of histamine H4 receptor expression in human dermal fibroblasts

The histamine H4 receptor (H4R) is the newest receptor identified of four histamine receptors. Its expression in numerous immune and inflammatory organs has been implicated in relation to immune systems and allergic diseases. In the present study, we demonstrate the expression of H4R in human dermal fibroblasts and investigate changes in its expression level when stimulated by histamine, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), lipopolysaccharides (LPS), dexamethasone and indomethacin. Histamine and PMA showed no effects on H4R expression. LPS and indomethacin up-regulated H4R mRNA expression, and 20 microM dexamethasone increased H4R protein levels. These results indicate a good prospective for this new receptor in the development of effective treatments of inflammatory diseases and pruritus or for the appropriate prevention of toxicities.