The efficacy and safety of flexible-dose vardenafil (levitra) in a broad population of European men

BACKGROUND: In fixed-dose studies, vardenafil 5, 10, and 20mg improves erectile function in men with erectile dysfunction (ED). Here, the efficacy and tolerability of vardenafil when used in a flexible-dose regimen was assessed. METHODS: In this multicenter trial, 323 patients randomly received vardenafil 10mg or placebo. After 4 weeks, patients could switch to 5 or 20mg (or corresponding placebo), or remain on 10mg for an additional 4 weeks; dose-switching was optional for the last 4 weeks. Efficacy variables included the IIEF-EF domain score, GAQ, and percentage of positive responses to SEP2/SEP3 questions. RESULTS: The IIEF-EF domain score significantly improved from a baseline of moderate ED (12.6-13.1) to mild ED in men on vardenafil (21.0-24.2) compared with placebo (13.7-15.6) at weeks 4, 8, 12, and last observation carried forward (LOCF) (p<0.005 vs. placebo). A significantly greater proportion of men receiving vardenafil at weeks 4, 8, 12, and LOCF reported improved erections (80-86% vs. 21-36% for placebo, p<0.005). Successful SEP2 rates increased after vardenafil, reaching 84% at weeks 8 and 12 vs. 49-53% receiving placebo (p<0.005 vs. placebo). Vardenafil improved successful SEP3 rates ranging from 58% to 74% compared to 22-34% for placebo. The most common adverse events, flushing and headache, were generally mild and transient. CONCLUSION: In this flexible dose study, vardenafil was well-tolerated, and produced clinically relevant improvements in erectile function in men with ED.     

Extended duration of efficacy of vardenafil when taken 8 hours before intercourse: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVES: This study explored the efficacy of vardenafil in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) when taken 8 hours before sexual intercourse. METHODS: A 10-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, flexible-dose study of vardenafil (5, 10 or 20mg) was conducted in men with ED for >6 months who failed >or=50% of intercourse attempts during a 4-week treatment-free run-in period. Sexual Encounter Profile Question 3 (SEP3) was the primary efficacy measure; secondary measures included SEP2, International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain score, Global Assessment Question (GAQ), Global Confidence Question (GCQ) and Erection Quality Scale (EQS). Adverse-event and safety monitoring were conducted throughout. RESULTS: 383 patients were randomized to vardenafil (n=194) or placebo (n=189). Patients treated with vardenafil 8 hours before sexual activity achieved clinically meaningful (>or=18%) and statistically significantly greater least-squares mean per-patient SEP3 and SEP2 success rates over weeks 2-10, compared with patients receiving placebo (SEP3 69% vs 34%; SEP2 81% vs 51%; both p<0.001). SEP3 and SEP2 measures demonstrated the significant superiority of vardenafil over placebo from week 2 onwards (p<0.001). Measurements of IIEF-EF domain score, GAQ, GCQ and EQS showed that vardenafil led to significantly greater improvements in erectile function, compared with placebo (all p<0.001). Vardenafil was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The extended duration of efficacy of vardenafil up to 8 hours postdose may provide couples with more flexibility in their sexual life than anticipated.     

口服伐地那非治疗勃起功能障碍疗效和安全性的临床研究

目的 :评价伐地那非对男性勃起功能障碍 (ED)患者的疗效和安全性。　方法 :应用随机、双盲、安慰剂平行对照、剂量固定 (5、1 0和 2 0mg)方法 ,对 88例ED患者进行 1 2周的临床研究。　结果 :5、1 0和 2 0mg伐地那非使ED患者达到和维持勃起的临床主要和次要指标均明显高于安慰剂 (P <0 .0 1 ) ;伐地那非各剂量组不良事件发生率高于安慰剂组 ,均为轻至中度 ,呈一过性。　结论 :伐地那非是治疗各种病因导致ED的安全、有效的药物。     

Efficacy of vardenafil in men with erectile dysfunction: a flexible-dose community practice study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of flexible dosing with vardenafil in a broad population of men with erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: 10-week, open-label, flexible-dose study starting with vardenafil 10 mg, titrating to 5 mg or 20 mg at weeks 2 and 6 based on efficacy and tolerability, set in 78 community practice centers in Germany and France. Participants comprised 398 men aged > or =18 years with ED. Main outcome measures were self-reported improvement in erections according to a Global Assessment Question (GAQ), diary questions from the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP2 and SEP3), and the erectile function domain score from the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire. RESULTS: In a last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis, a total of 92% (336/366) of men with ED reported an improvement of erections according to the GAQ. Per-patient success rates for penetration (SEP2) and maintenance (SEP3) of erection for intercourse were 89% (348/390) and 78% (303/390), respectively. Mean erectile function domain scores increased from 13.9 at baseline to 25.9 at LOCF. Vardenafil was generally well tolerated; headache (6%, 25/398) and flushing (6%, 24/398) were the most frequent adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this community practice setting, vardenafil was shown to be a highly effective and generally well-tolerated treatment for men with ED when dosing was titrated by the physician to individual patient requirements.     

Efficacy and tolerability of vardenafil in Asian men with erectile dysfunction

Aim： To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of vardenafil, a phosphodiesterase type-5 （PDE-5） inhibitor, in men of Asian ethnicity with erectile dysfunction （ED）. Methods： In this prospective, double-blind, multinational study, Asian men were randomized to receive vardenafil （10 mg） or placebo （4：1 ratio） for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variables were the International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain （IIEF-EF）, and Sexual Encounter Profile （SEP） questions related to penetration and intercourse completion. Significant mean improvements were required in all three measures to show positive benefits of vardenafil treatment. Secondary efficacy variables included the Global Assessment Question （GAQ） on erection improvement. Results： Least-squares mean baseline IIEF-EF domain scores （vardenafil 14.6, placebo 13.4） were consistent with moderate ED. After 12 weeks, vardenafil treatment was associated with significant increases from the baseline in IIEF-EF domain scores compared with the placebo （22.4 vs. 14.3; P 〈 0.001）. Vardenafil was associated with significant improvements from baseline in least squares （LS） mean success rates for SEP-2 （vardenafil 82.2 vs. placebo 43.6; P 〈 0.001） and SEP-3 （vardenafil 66.1 vs. placebo 24.0; P 〈 0.001）. Positive GAQ responses were reported by 81.8% of vardenafil recipients vs. 24.3% of placebo recipients. Adverse events were reported by 25.4% of the vardenafil group, the majority mild and transient. Conclusion： Vardenafil （10 mg） is a highly effective and well-tolerated treatment for moderate ED in Asian men. These results add to the increasing amount of data demonstrating the safety and efficacy of vardenafil for the treatment of ED in a range of patient populations.     

Vardenafil is effective and well-tolerated for treating erectile dysfunction in a broad population of men, irrespective of age

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of vardenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in men of different age groups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective pooled subgroup analysis of randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled studies, men from the general population with ED received either placebo or vardenafil 5, 10 or 20 mg over 12 weeks. Efficacy variables included the erectile function (EF) domain score from The International Index of Erectile Function, diary response rates to questions on vaginal penetration and maintenance of erection, and positive responses to the Global Assessment Question (GAQ) ‘Has the treatment you have been taking over the past 4 weeks improved your erections?’. The 1385 men were grouped by age (<45, 45–64 and ≥65 years).

RESULTS

At 12 weeks the EF domain scores approached 20 with vardenafil and 14 with placebo in men aged ≥ 65 years (P < 0.03 vardenafil 5 mg vs placebo, P < 0.001 vardenafil 10 and 20 mg vs placebo). The corresponding scores were 22 and 14 in men aged 45–64 years and up to 24 and 16 in those aged <45 years (P < 0.03 vardenafil 5 mg vs placebo, P < 0.001 vardenafil 10 and 20 mg vs placebo). Vardenafil generated positive GAQ responses in ≈ 71%, 76% and 85% of men aged <45, 45–64 and ≥ 65 years (P ≤ 0.001 vardenafil vs placebo). The corresponding placebo rates were 23%, 25% and 34%. The most common treatment‐emergent adverse events were headache, rhinitis, flushing and dyspepsia, which were mild to moderate, transient and unrelated to age.

CONCLUSION

Vardenafil is an effective and generally well‐tolerated treatment for ED, irrespective of age.

     

The efficacy and safety of tadalafil: an update

OBJECTIVE: To provide an update on the efficacy and safety of tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 2102 men (mean age 56 years) with mild-to-severe ED of various causes were randomized to placebo or tadalafil, taken as needed with no food restrictions, at fixed 'on-demand' doses of 10 or 20 mg in 11 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials lasting 12 weeks. The three co-primary outcomes were changes from baseline in the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and the proportion of 'yes' responses to questions 2 and 3 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP). Additional efficacy instruments included a Global Assessment Question (GAQ). RESULTS: Compared with placebo, tadalafil gave significantly better outcomes. Patients receiving either dose of tadalafil had a significant mean improvement of 6.5 and 8.6, respectively, in the IIEF erectile function domain score from baseline (P < 0.001 vs placebo). At both doses the mean success rate for intercourse attempts (SEP-Q3) was 58% and 68%, respectively, compared with 31% in the placebo group (P < 0.001), and 71% and 84% reported improved erections at the endpoint (GAQ), vs 33% on placebo (P < 0.001). Tadalafil was effective up to 36 h after dosing and was effective regardless of disease severity and causes, and in patients of all ages. The most frequent adverse events were headache, dyspepsia, back pain and myalgia. CONCLUSION: Tadalafil was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for ED.     

Efficacy and treatment satisfaction with on-demand tadalafil (Cialis) in men with erectile dysfunction

OBJECTIVE: Tadalafil (Cialis) is an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5, which mediates relaxation of vascular smooth muscle in the corpus cavernosum thus facilitating erection. The purpose of this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate efficacy and treatment satisfaction of on-demand Cialis in men with mild-to-severe erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: Following a 4-week treatment-free run in period, patients stratified into three severity groups by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) domain score were randomized to receive either placebo or Cialis 20 mg taken on demand over a 12-week period. Efficacy endpoints were change from baseline in IIEF EF domain scores, responses to Sexual Encounter Profile diary (SEP) questions, and responses to the Global Assessment Questions (GAQ). Treatment satisfaction was evaluated using the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire in two of seven participating countries where validated translations were available. RESULTS: Of the 443 men who entered the trial, 409 (mean age, 52 years) formed the intent-to-treat population. Mean baseline demographics and ED severity measures were balanced between treatment groups except for a higher percentage of patients na?ve to sildenafil in the tadalafil group compared to placebo (50% versus 36%). The percentage of patients in each IIEF EF severity class (mild, moderate and severe) was 47%, 30% and 23% for placebo patients and 48%, 29% and 23% for tadalafil patients, respectively. Tadalafil was significantly superior to placebo on all primary efficacy measures (IIEF EF domain scores, SEP15, GAQ1; p < 0.001); notably 64% of tadalafil patients achieved a normal IIEF EF domain score at endpoint compared to 16% of placebo patients (p < 0.001). Of the 185 patients completing the EDITS questionnaire (137 receiving Cialis and 48 receiving placebo), tadalafil-treated patients had a median EDITS score of 84 (95%CI 80, 86), which was significantly higher than the median score for placebo-treated patients of 41 (95%CI 32, 59; p < 0.001; Wilcoxon test). The proportion of patients satisfied with treatment (defined as final EDITS score greater than 50) was 87% for the tadalafil-treated group and 46% for the placebo-treated group (p < 0.001; exact test). Adverse events were significantly more common with tadalafil than placebo (p < 0.01) and included primarily headache (7.2% versus 1.9%) and flushing (4.6% versus 0%). One patient discontinued tadalafil treatment due to back pain. CONCLUSION: In men with mild-to-severe ED, tadalafil 20 mg significantly improves erectile function, demonstrates superior treatment satisfaction relative to placebo, and is well tolerated. This is the first study to yield efficacy data on tadalafil in an Eastern European population of men with erectile dysfunction, and the first to measure satisfaction with the EDITS questionnaire in any study population of men with this condition using tadalafil.     

DOES SILDENAFIL COMBINED WITH TESTOSTERONE GEL IMPROVE ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION IN HYPOGONADAL MEN IN WHOM TESTOSTERONE SUPPLEMENT THERAPY ALONE FAILED?

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy of testosterone gel (T-gel) alone and in combination with sildenafil in hypogonadal patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 49 hypogonadal men (mean age 60.7 years) with ED participated for a mean of 20.2 months. Blood was tested for total and bioavailable testosterone, and prostate specific antigen. Sexual function was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire and a global assessment question (GAQ). Men received 1% 5 gm T-gel for 6 months, and 100 mg sildenafil was added to those with a "no" response to the GAQ after 3 months on testosterone supplement. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients reported significant improvement in the sexual desire domain (from a mean +/- SD of 4.2 +/- 0.8 to 8.6 +/- 0.4) and erectile function (EF) domain (from 13.6 +/- 1.9 to 27 +/- 0.8) following treatment with testosterone supplement alone. One patient was excluded from study after urinary retention developed and 9 reported irritation at the gel application site. In spite of normalization of total and bioavailable testosterone values, and significant improvement of sexual desire domain scores, the EF of 17 men remained less than 26 or they responded "no" to the GAQ. These men received combined T-gel and sildenafil, after which all graded EF greater than 26 and responded positively to the GAQ. CONCLUSIONS: Combined treatment with sildenafil and T-gel has a beneficial effect on ED in hypogonadal patients in whom treatment with testosterone supplement alone failed.     

Vardenafil 20-mg demonstrated superior efficacy to 10-mg in Japanese men with diabetes mellitus suffering from erectile dysfunction

AIM: Vardenafil is a highly selective and potent phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). The efficacy of vardenafil has been demonstrated in a broad range of ED populations, but has not yet been assessed in Japanese patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), although DM is frequently associated with difficult-to-treat ED. This is the first study to investigate whether high-dose vardenafil (20 mg) can demonstrate superior efficacy to the usual dose (10 mg) in this subpopulation in Japan. METHODS: The study was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multi-centre, parallel group comparison 12-week study. Following 4 weeks observation period, 778 patients aged 26-64 years old with ED and DM (HbA1c >12% at screening was excluded) both of more than 3 years duration were randomly allocated to one of the three groups, vardenafil 10 mg, 20 mg, or placebo (randomization ratio 3:3:1). Erectile function (EF) domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function was estimated as the primary efficacy parameter. RESULTS: Vardenafil 10 and 20 mg both significantly improved the EF domain score from 13.6 and 13.9 at baseline to 21.8 and 22.9 at last observation carried forward (LOCF), respectively, compared to placebo (13.7 at baseline to 16.3 at LOCF; p<0.0001). In addition, vardenafil 20 mg demonstrated superior efficacy to 10 mg (p<0.05), and the difference was more evident in severe ED patients (baseline EF domain score <11). The safety profile was comparable between these two doses (drug-related adverse events: 6.6, 22.0 and 24.2% in placebo, vardenafil 10 mg, and 20 mg arms, respectively). The most common adverse events were hot flush, headache and nasal congestion, which were mild in intensity and transient, and are known to be common to PDE5 inhibitors. CONCLUSION: In Japanese men with DM and ED, vardenafil 10 mg and 20 mg were effective in improving erectile function with comparable safety profiles. Vardenafil 20 mg demonstrated superior efficacy compared with 10 mg, suggesting incremental clinical benefit in using the higher dose in this difficult-to-treat population.     

Safety and efficacy of vardenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction: Result of a bridging study in Japan

AIM: Vardenafil is a selective and highly potent phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), with improved selectivity for PDE5 and demonstrated efficacy for improving sexual function in men with ED. The current study investigated the safety and efficacy of this new PDE5 inhibitor in Japanese men with ED. METHODS: This was a prospective, double blind, randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vardenafil. Following a 4-week treatment-free observation period, 283 eligible patients were randomized to 12 weeks treatment with vardenafil 5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, or placebo. Primary efficacy responses were assessed using the scores of Q3 and Q4 of the international index of erectile function (IIEF). RESULTS: All three vardenafil doses showed significantly better improvement than the placebo group in Q3 and Q4 scores of the IIEF questionnaire, either at 12 weeks or at the 'last observation carried forward' (LOCF, P < 0.0001). Q3 scores were improved to 4.06 with vardenafil 5 mg, 4.53 with vardenafil 10 mg, and 4.64 with vardenafil 20 mg, versus 3.17 with placebo. Comparable scores for Q4 were 3.47, 4.15 and 4.31 versus 2.31 for placebo. Up to 86% of patients achieved improved erections as assessed by the global assessment question (GAQ). Reported adverse event rates were 35.3%, 45.3% and 54.5% with vardenafil 5 mg, 10 mg and 20 mg, respectively, versus 21.1% in the placebo group. No serious adverse drug reactions were reported. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were transient headache, flushing and rhinitis, which were mostly mild. CONCLUSION: Vardenafil is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for ED and provides improvement in key indices of erectile function among Japanese men with ED. The results of our trial show that up to nearly 90% of patients achieve improved erections with the administration of vardenafil.     

Efficacy and safety of on-demand tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in South-East Asian men

AIM: Tadalafil is an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5 used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). The efficacy and safety of tadalafil have been evaluated extensively in Western populations. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of on-demand tadalafil for the treatment of ED in South-East Asian men. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of men with mild to severe ED of various etiologies randomized to receive placebo (n = 122), tadalafil 10 mg (n = 120), or tadalafil 20 mg (n = 125), taken as needed (maximum once daily) for 12 weeks. Efficacy assessments included the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary, and a Global Assessment Question (GAQ). RESULTS: Men from China, Singapore, and the Philippines participated in this trial (n = 367). Compared with placebo, tadalafil significantly improved erectile dysfunction on all efficacy outcomes (P < 0.001). Patients receiving tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg experienced a significant mean improvement of 8.1 and 8.7, respectively, in the IIEF Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain score from baseline (vs placebo 2.4, P < 0.001). In patients receiving tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg, the mean per-patient success rate for intercourse attempts (SEP3) was 62% and 70%, respectively, compared with 32% for the placebo group (P < 0.001). Of patients who received tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg, 81% and 86% reported improved erections at endpoint (GAQ) compared with 44% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). The most common adverse events reported by patients were headache, back pain, dyspepsia, and dizziness. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for South-East Asian men with ED.     

Long-term treatment of erectile dysfunction with a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor and dose optimization based on nocturnal penile tumescence

Associate Editor Michael G. Wyllie Editorial Board Ian Eardley, UK Jean Fourcroy, USA Sidney Glina, Brazil Julia Heiman, USA Chris McMahon, Australia Bob Millar, UK Alvaro Morales, Canada Michael Perelman, USA Marcel Waldinger, Netherlands

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that a variable dosage of the oral phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor sildenafil (25, 50, 100 mg) or vardenafil (5, 10, 25 mg) determined according to results obtained from nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR, RigiScan), given nightly for 1 year, can improve spontaneous erectile function (EF) in men with mild‐to‐moderate arteriogenic erectile dysfunction (ED); this regimen was compared with a fixed daily dosage of sildenafil 25 mg or vardenafil 5 mg.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective open‐label, parallel‐group trial 154 men with ED were randomized either to fixed low‐dose sildenafil 25 mg or vardenafil 5 mg (group 1) or to the lowest erectile dosage of sildenafil (25, 50 or 100 mg) or vardenafil (5, 10 or 20 mg) (group 2) provoking an erectile event as measured by NPTR nightly for 1 year. The EF domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) was assessed before and 1 year after the beginning of treatment, and at 4 weeks after ending treatment.

RESULTS

After 1 year, 27 of 63 (64%) evaluable men in group 1 had an EF domain score in the normal range, vs 46 of 61 (75%) men in group 2. After the subsequent 4‐week wash‐out phase, both groups continued to have improved EF domain scores; 22 of 63 (35%) men in group 1 still had a score in the normal range, whereas 38 of 61 (62%) in group 2 had a normal score. The EF domain score in group 1 and 2 improved significantly after 1 year of treatment, from 13.6 to 18.9, and 15.1 to 23.9, respectively (P < 0.01). After the subsequent 4‐week wash‐out phase, men from both groups maintained this significant level of EF, at 17.1 and 22.4, respectively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Nightly PDE5‐inhibitor treatment 1 year in a dosage determined by NPTR measurements results in better EF than giving a fixed dosage of sildenafil (25 mg) or vardenafil (5 mg). This improvement persisted for >4 weeks beyond the end of treatment. The results from this open‐label, randomized trial warrant verification under double‐blind, placebo‐controlled conditions.     

Sildenafil reduces bother associated with erectile dysfunction: pooled analysis of five randomized, double-blind trials

Improvement in bother associated with erectile dysfunction (ED) is an important aspect of successful treatment of ED. Changes in erectile function and the bother associated with ED were assessed in this analysis of pooled data from five 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose studies of sildenafil. Men who received sildenafil (n=578, vs placebo, n=550) had significantly greater (least squares mean+/-s.e.) improvement in erectile function (EF) domain scores of the international index of erectile function (IIEF) (10.0+/-0.3 vs 1.0+/-0.3, P<0.0001) and in erection distress scale (EDS) total transformed score (18.8+/-0.8 vs 4.8+/-0.9, P<0.0001). Scores on individual questions of the EDS were 24-65% higher after treatment with sildenafil (vs 8-12%, for placebo). The change in EF domain score correlated positively with the change in total transformed EDS score (0.43, P<0.0001). Successful treatment of ED with sildenafil may reduce the bother associated with ED.     

Efficacy and safety of tadalafil taken as needed for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in Asian men： results of an integrated analysis

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of as-needed tadalafil in a diverse clinical population （with varying patient demographics, disease severity, and comorbid medical conditions） of Asian men with erectile dysfunction （ED）. An integrated analysis of five double-blind, placebo-controlled trials （N = 1 046） was performed. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg tadalafil （N = 185）, 20 mg tadalafil （N = 510）, or placebo （N = 351）. Efficacy assessments included the International Index of Erectile Function （IIEF）, Sexual Encounter Profile （SEP） diary and Global Assessment Question （GAQ）. Patients receiving 10 mg or 20 mg tadalafil showed significant improvement from baseline-to-end point on the Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function （IIEF-EF） domain score in all clinical sub-populations analyzed, compared with patients receiving placebo （P 〈 0.001）. The 10-mg and 20-mg tadalafil groups showed a mean success rate of 64.1% and 70.5% for sexual intercourse attempts （SEP3, successful intercourse）, respectively, compared with 33.4% in the placebo group （P 〈 0.001）, and 85.5% and 85.4% reported improved erections at end point GAQ, respectively, versus 43.5% in the placebo group （P 〈 0.001）. Tadalafil was well tolerated across all groups studied. Headache and back pain were the most frequently reported adverse events. Overall, tadalafil was effective and well tolerated across a diverse clinical spectrum of Asian men with ED.     

The efficacy and tolerability of vardenafil, a new, oral, selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, in patients with erectile dysfunction: the first at-home clinical trial

Vardenafil, a novel selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, was evaluated in its first large-scale at-home trial. A total of 601 men with mild to severe erectile dysfunction (ED) were enrolled in this multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 12 weeks of treatment with either placebo or 5, 10 and 20 mg of vardenafil. Primary endpoints were Q3 (vaginal penetration) and Q4 (maintenance of erection) of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). In the intent-to-treat population (n=580), the changes from baseline for 5, 10 and 20 mg vardenafil (1.2, 1.3 and 1.5, respectively) were all improved (P<0.001) over placebo (0.2) for Q3 and were similarly improved for Q4 (1.4, 1.5 and 1.7) compared to placebo (0.5) (P<0.001). All vardenafil doses improved all IIEF domains compared to placebo (P<0.001). The percentage of successful intercourses was between 71 and 75% for the three vardenafil doses. For the 20 mg dose, 80% of the patients experienced improved erections (GAQ) compared to 30% for placebo. Most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were headache (7-15%), flushing (10-11%) and up to 7% for dyspepsia or rhinitis. Vardenafil treatment resulted in a high efficacy and low adverse-event profile in a population with mixed ED etiologies.     

An open-label, randomized, flexible-dose, crossover study to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate and apomorphine hydrochloride in men with erectile dysfunction

Two papers in this section deal with well‐known pharmacological agents used to treat male erectile dysfunction. In the first of these, authors from the UK compared the efficacy and safety of sildenafil and apomorphine in such patients. This open‐label crossover trial suggested that sildenafil was better than apomorphine, where the primary endpoint was the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. The second paper is an update on the efficacy and safety of tadalafil. It describes the results of its use in a large number of men with erectile dysfunction, compared to placebo. Once again, the erectile function domain was one of the primary endpoints. Tadalafil was an effective and well tolerated treatment for this condition.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of sildenafil and apomorphine in the treatment of men with erectile dysfunction (ED).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 139 men with ED who were naïve to treatment were entered into an open‐label crossover trial with two treatment periods, each of 8 weeks, separated by a 2‐week washout period. Men were randomized to receive either sildenafil then apomorphine or apomorphine then sildenafil, and were allowed to titrate the dose on both drugs. The primary endpoint was the erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and other endpoints included diary data, the other domains of the IIEF, overall assessment questions and the Erectile Dysfunction Index of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire.

RESULTS

The EF domain score after treatment was 25.2 for sildenafil and 15.9 for apomorphine. The treatment difference of the adjusted means was 9.3 points (95% confidence interval 7.6–11.1; P < 0.001). After sildenafil the successful intercourse rate was 75%, vs 35% for apomorphine (P < 0.001), and the EDITS scores were 82.5 for sildenafil and 46.8 for apomorphine (P < 0.001). Of the men, 96% expressed a preference for sildenafil as a treatment for their ED. The side‐effect profiles for both drugs were in keeping with published data.

CONCLUSION

By all measurable endpoints sildenafil was superior to apomorphine in this open‐label crossover study of men with ED who were naïve to therapy

     

Efficacy and safety of tadalafil in a Western European population of men with erectile dysfunction

Section Editor Michael G. Wyllie Panel of Advisors Ian Eardley, UK Jean Fourcroy, USA Sidney Glina, Brazil Julia Heiman, USA Chris McMahon, Australia Bob Millar, UK Alvaro Morales, Canada Michael Perelman, USA

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate, in a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multicentre trial, the safety and efficacy of on‐demand tadalafil (an oral phosphodiesterase type‐5 inhibitor approved in many countries for treating erectile dysfunction, ED) in a Western European population of men with mild‐to‐severe ED.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized according to baseline severity of ED in a ratio of 3 : 1 to receive either tadalafil 20 mg or placebo for 12 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoints were mean changes from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks) in the erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and percentages of ‘Yes’ responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary Question 2 (‘Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?’) and Question 3 (‘Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?’). Secondary endpoints included mean changes from baseline to endpoint in IIEF Intercourse Satisfaction and Overall Satisfaction domains, selected questions of the IIEF, and the percentage of ‘Yes’ responses to Global Assessment Questions (GAQ) at the last visit. Other analyses included the percentage of patients in each treatment group at endpoint with IIEF EF domain scores in the normal range (>26), the frequency of intercourse attempts and mean per‐patient intercourse success rate at various times after dosing.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 53 years and 80% had a history of ED of ≥ 1 year. The mean baseline EF domain score was 13.5, with 40.5% of patients in the severe category. Tadalafil improved mean EF domain scores by 11.1, vs 0.4 for placebo (P < 0.001). In addition, 73.9% of sexual intercourse attempts were successful (SEP‐Q3) in tadalafil‐treated patients, compared with 29.9% in placebo‐treated patients during the period after baseline (P < 0.001). Tadalafil significantly improved the mean IIEF intercourse satisfaction (5.1, tadalafil; 1.1, placebo) and overall satisfaction domain scores (3.9, tadalafil; 0.5, placebo), P < 0.001. GAQs used to assess the overall effect of the treatment indicated that tadalafil was superior to placebo (P < 0.001) in improving erections (82.1%, tadalafil; 23.1%, placebo) and sexual activity (78.6% and 17.3%). The most common treatment‐emergent adverse events more frequent (>2%) with tadalafil than placebo were headache, dyspepsia, flushing, back pain, pain in limb and myalgia. These adverse events were mostly mild to moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Tadalafil improved erectile function and was well tolerated when taken by men from Western Europe with mild‐to‐severe ED.

     

Tadalafil is efficacious in Black American and Hispanic men with erectile dysfunction: results from multiple observations in men with erectile dysfunction in national tadalafil study in the US (MOMENTUS)

To show that tadalafil is efficacious in Black American and Hispanic men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and efficacy is noninferior to that in Caucasian men. Multiple observations in men with ED in national tadalafil study in the US, a multicenter, open-label study, assessed the efficacy of tadalafil 20 mg taken as needed (maximum one dose/day before sexual activity) for 12 weeks by patients with ED in various populations. This analysis focuses on three groups: Caucasian (Reference group), Black American, and Hispanic men. Primary measurement of efficacy was change from baseline in erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and the primary analysis was whether efficacy in Black American and Hispanic groups was noninferior to efficacy in the Caucasian group. Secondary efficacy measures included sexual encounter profile (SEP), IIEF intercourse satisfaction (IS) and overall satisfaction (OS) domains, Global Assessment Question (GAQ), and Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scale (PAIRS). Safety was assessed from adverse events (AEs) reported by all enrolled patients. The increase in IIEF EF domain score (>or=9.5) from baseline for each group was statistically significant (P<0.001) and clinically relevant. Efficacy of tadalafil in Black American and Hispanic patients was noninferior to the Caucasian group. IS and OS domains of IIEF had a statistically significant increase from baseline (P<0.001). Change from baseline in positive responses to SEP questions for each group was significant (P<0.001). At least 77% of intercourse attempts were successful over various time intervals up to 36 h postdose. At least 88% of patients in the various groups had a positive response to GAQ1. Improvement from baseline in Sexual Self-Confidence and Spontaneity domains of PAIRS was statistically significant (P<0.001). A low number of AEs and a low AE-related discontinuation rate (2.3%) were reported in all groups. Tadalafil 20 mg was as efficacious in Black American and Hispanic men with ED as in Caucasian patients and was well tolerated.     

Therapeutic effectiveness and patient satisfaction after 6 months of treatment with tadalafil, sildenafil, and vardenafil: results from the erectile dysfunction observational study (EDOS)

OBJECTIVE: This observational study was conducted across Europe to assess health outcomes in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) who took tadalafil, sildenafil citrate (sildenafil), or vardenafil HCl (vardenafil) for 6 mo. METHODS: Therapy effectiveness and patient satisfaction were evaluated using established and new questions on erectile function. Behavioural, psychological, and relationship outcomes were assessed using the short form of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (SF-PAIRS). RESULTS: In nine European countries at 904 sites, 8047 patients were enrolled and 94% (7560) selected either tadalafil (5315), sildenafil (1252), or vardenafil (993) for treatment at baseline. Of the 7560, 3998 (52.9%) took the same drug for 6 mo. Baseline characteristics across the three treatment groups were comparable: mean age approximately 56 yr, moderate or severe ED, and mean International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain score about 13. Tadalafil, sildenafil, and vardenafil were therapeutically effective and improved patient satisfaction in the 40-58% of men who completed 6 mo of a single therapy. Patients taking tadalafil consistently had numerically higher levels of therapeutic effectiveness and satisfaction compared with patients who took sildenafil or vardenafil. The three cohorts had statistically significant changes from baseline in response to SF-PAIRS and there were significant differences, in favour of tadalafil, among cohorts in the Time Concerns domain. CONCLUSION: In a large observational study that mimics a routine clinical setting, most patients selected an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 5 to treat ED, which resulted in a high level of therapeutic effectiveness and patient satisfaction.