A multicenter, randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for empiric antifungal therapy of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of fluconazole and amphotericin B as empiric antifungal therapy of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 317 neutropenic patients (<500 cells/mm3) with persistent or recrudescent fever despite 4 or more days of antibacterial therapy were randomly assigned to receive either fluconazole (400 mg intravenously once daily) or amphotericin B (0.5 mg/kg once daily). Patients were evaluated for the efficacy and safety of each drug by clinical criteria, frequent cultures and radiological procedures, and laboratory values. A response was classified as satisfactory at the end of therapy if the patient was afebrile, had no clinical or microbiological evidence of fungal infection, and did not require study termination due to lack of efficacy, drug toxicity, or death. RESULTS: A satisfactory response occurred in 68% of the patients treated with fluconazole (107 of 158 patients) and in 67% of patients treated with amphotericin B (106 of 159 patients). Progressive or new fungal infections during therapy occurred in 13 (8%) patients treated with fluconazole (8 with Candida, 5 with Aspergillus) and in 10 (6%) patients treated with amphotericin B (5 with Candida, 3 with Aspergillus, 2 with other fungi). Adverse events related to study drug (especially fever, chills, renal insufficiency, electrolyte disturbances, and respiratory distress) occurred more often in patients treated with amphotericin B (128 [81%] of 159 patients) than patients treated with fluconazole (20 [13%] of 158 patients, P = 0.001). Eleven (7%) patients treated with amphotericin B but only 1 (1%) patient treated with fluconazole were terminated from the study owing to an adverse event (P = 0.005). Overall mortality (27 [17%] patients treated with fluconazole versus 34 [21%] patients treated with amphotericin B) and mortality from fungal infection (7 [4%] patients treated with fluconazole versus 5 [3%] patients treated with amphotericin B) were similar in each study group. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous fluconazole can be an effective and safe alternative to amphotericin B for empiric antifungal therapy in many febrile neutropenic patients. However, because fluconazole may be ineffective in the treatment of Aspergillus, patients at risk for that infection should be evaluated by chest radiograph, computed tomographic scanning, and cultures before the use of empiric fluconazole therapy.     

Empiric antibiotic and antifungal therapy for cancer patients with prolonged fever and granulocytopenia

Since early diagnosis of even a disseminated fungal infection is difficult and treatment often ineffective in a patient with persistent granulocytopenia, we have prospectively evaluated continued antibiotic therapy and early empiric antifungal therapy in patients with prolonged fever and granulocytopenia. Between November 1975 and December 1979, all patients with fever (oral temperature >38 °C three times per 24 hours or >38.5 °C once) plus granulocytopenia (polymorphonuclear leukocytes < 500/mm³), were evaluated and began an empiric antibiotic regimen consisting of Keflin^®, gentamicin and carbenicillin (KGC). Of the 652 episodes of fever and granulocytopenia (in 271 patients), initial evaluation failed to define an infectious etiology in 323 (49.5 percent). In 50 of the patients in whom initial evaluation did not demonstrate an infectious etiology, fever and granulocytopenia continued after seven days of therapy with KGC, without evidence for the etiology of their persistent fever. These patients were randomized to either discontinue receiving KGC (Group 1); continue receiving KGC (Group 2); continue receiving KGC with the addition of empiric amphotericin B (Group 3). The duration of granulocytopenia was comparable in the three groups (median 24 days, range 8 to 51 days). Clinically or microbiologically demonstrable infections occurred in nine of 16 patients who discontinued the KGC regimen (Group 1) (six also experienced shock, p < 0.01) compared with six of 16 patients who continued the KGC regimen (Group 2) (five in whom fungal infection developed), and in two of 18 patients who continued the KGC regimen plus amphotericin B (Group 3). The incidence of infections was less for patients receiving KGC plus amphotericin B than for patients who discontinued the KGC regimen (p = 0.013).Empiric amphotericin B therapy was also evaluated for its effectiveness in patients whose initial evaluation revealed an infectious etiology with fungal colonization throughout their alimentary tract but in whom fever and granulocytopenia remained despite at least seven days of therapy with appropriate antibiotics. In addition, the postmortem records of all patients dying between 1970 and 1979 were reviewed to ascertain the cause of death and the type of antimicrobial therapy received prior to death. Only one death due to fungal invasion occurred, when therapy with amphotericin B was instituted after one week of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy.Collectively, these data suggest that continuing antibiotic therapy reduces early bacterial infections in patients with persistent fever and granulocytopenia and that empiric antifungal therapy also appears necessary to prevent fungal superinfections and to control clinically undetected fungal invasion.     

Fluconazole for empiric antifungal therapy in cancer patients with fever and neutropenia

Background  

Several clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of fluconazole as empiric antifungal therapy in cancer patients with fever and neutropenia. Our objective was to assess the frequency and resource utilization associated with treatment failure in cancer patients given empiric fluconazole antifungal therapy in routine inpatient care.     

Hepatosplenic microabscesses in pediatric leukemia: a report of five cases

Hepatosplenic microabscesses secondary to invasion by various organisms may result in life-threatening conditions, especially in patients with cancer. Whether these patients should continue ongoing cytotoxic therapy, which might result in neutropenia, with the risk of progressive abscess formation or fungemia, remains a dilemma. We report five cases of pediatric acute leukemia with hepatosplenic microabscesses in children aged 4 years to 18 years. These patients presented with prolonged fever and neutropenia after antineoplastic chemotherapy, followed by abdominal pain, hepatosplenomegaly and hepatic dysfunction. Abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated multiple small lesions compatible with hepatosplenic candidiasis in all of the patients. Cultures, including blood or stool cultures, were positive in only two cases. Treatment with intravenous antifungal agents, including amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B, and/or fluconazole were successful in two cases. These two patients remained event-free and survived for more than 24 months (20 months and 22 months after infection was diagnosed). The duration of systemic antifungal medication administration ranged from 3 months to 22 months. The serial image examinations revealed drastic reductions in small residual lesions in the two patients who survived the longest. The major issues for these patients were how long the antifungal therapy should be administered for, and how to select the optimal drug and dosage to avoid hepatic and renal toxicity. Among our patients, alternative therapy with amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B, and fluconazole was used according to the patients' conditions, and the duration of antifungal therapy was determined by clinical manifestations and imaging study changes.     

Fluconazole vs low-dose amphotericin B for the prevention of fungal infections in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation: a study of the North American Marrow Transplant Group

Systemic fungal infections are a major problem in bone marrow transplant recipients who have prolonged neutropenia or who receive high-dose corticosteroids. Prophylaxis with Fluconazole or low-dose amphotericin B reduces, but does not eliminate these infections. To determine which prophylactic agent is better, we performed a prospective randomized study. Patients undergoing allogeneic (related or unrelated) or autologous marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation were randomized to receive Fluconazole (400 mg/day p. o. or i.v.) or amphotericin B (0.2 mg/kg/day i.v.) beginning 1 day prior to stem cell transplantation and continuing until recovery of neutrophils to >500/microl. Patients were removed from their study drug for drug-associated toxicity, invasive fungal infection or suspected fungal infection (defined as the presence of fever >38 degrees C without positive culture while on broad-spectrum anti-bacterial antibiotics). Proven or suspected fungal infections were treated with high-dose amphotericin B (0.5-0.7 mg/kg/day). Patients were randomized at each institution and stratified for the type of transplant. The primary end-point of the study was prevention of documented fungal infection; secondary endpoints included fungal colonization, drug toxicity, duration of hospitalization, duration of fever, duration of neutropenia, duration and total dose of high-dose amphotericin B and overall survival to hospital discharge. From July 1992 to October 1994, a total of 355 patients entered into the trial with 159 patients randomized to amphotericin B and 196 to Fluconazole. Patient groups were comparable for diagnosis, age, sex, prior antibiotic or antifungal therapy, use of corticosteroids prior to transplantation and total duration of neutropenia. Amphotericin B was significantly more toxic than Fluconazole especially in related allogeneic transplantation where 19% of patients developed toxicity vs 0% of Fluconazole recipients (p < 0.05). Approximately 44% of all patients were removed from prophylaxis for presumed fungal infection. Proven fungal infections occurred in 4.1% and 7.5% of Fluconazole and amphotericin-treated patients, respectively. Proven fungal infections occurred in 9.1% and 14.3% of related allogeneic marrow recipients receiving Fluconazole or amphotericin B, respectively, and 2.1% and 5.6% of autologous marrow recipients receiving Fluconazole or amphotericin B, respectively (P > 0.05). In this prospective trial, low-dose amphotericin B prophylaxis was as effective as Fluconazole prophylaxis, but Fluconazole was significantly better tolerated.     

Empiric antifungal therapy in neutropenic cancer patients

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients and those patients with acute leukemia are at greatest risk for invasive fungal infections particularly due to Candida and Aspergillus species during periods of profound neutropenia. Empiric antifungal therapy in persistently febrile neutropenic patients has been adopted as a standard of care. Antifungal therapeutic options include: amphotericin B, lipid formulations of amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and caspofungin. Amphotericin B preparations offer a beneficial effect for survival, defervescence, and a decrease in breakthrough fungal infections. Lipid formulations of amphotericin B may provide beneficial effects over amphotericin B with regard to survival, treatment of baseline fungal infection, breakthrough fungal infection, and fewer discontinuations due to lack of efficacy. Amphotericin B compounds produce a trend for better outcomes in defervescence, treatment of baseline fungal infections, prevention of breakthrough infections, and avoidance of discontinuation compared with the azoles. Caspofungin is also effective. The optimal empiric antifungal agent and the precise time of initiation remain to be determined.     

Randomized trial of fluconazole versus low-dose amphotericin B in prophylaxis against fungal infections in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Over the past decade, invasive fungal infections have become an increasingly important problem in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The optimal approach for prophylactic antifungal therapy has yet to be determined. To resolve this issue, we performed a prospective randomized study to compare the efficacy of fluconazole (FL) versus low-dose amphotericin B (AmB) in preventing fungal infections during the first 100 days after HSCT. Patients undergoing allogenic or autologous HSCT were randomized to receive fluconazole 200 mg/day PO or amphotericin B 0.2 mg/kg/day IV beginning 1 day prior to commencement of conditioning regimen and continuing until engraftment, drug-associated toxicity was suspected, or systemic fungal infection was suspected or proven. High-dose amphotericin B (0.5-1.0 mg/kg/day) was started for patients with suspected or proven fungal infections. From January 1993 to December 1998, a total of 186 patients were enrolled into the trial, with 100 receiving FL and 86 receiving AmB. Eighty (43%) patients were removed from prophylaxis for persistent fever despite broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy or suspected fungal infections (FL 46 vs. AmB 34, P > 0.05). The incidence of proven fungal infections (FL 12% vs. AmB 12.8%), suspected fungal infections (FL 4% vs. AmB 2.3%), superficial fungal infections (FL 1% vs. AmB 4.6%) did not show any significant difference. The survival at 100 days post transplant was similar between the 2 groups (FL 78% vs. AmB 70%, P = 0.254). Death attributable to fungal infections was similar in both groups (6% vs. 7%, P > 0.05). We conclude that fluconazole is as effective as low-dose amphotericin B in prophylaxis against fungal infections in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation.     

Empiric use of vancomycin during prolonged treatment-induced granulocytopenia. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with acute leukemia

Because gram-positive infections cause morbidity following intensive antileukemic chemotherapy, the effects of vancomycin versus placebo were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 60 adult patients with acute leukemia and first infectious fever during prolonged (mean of 32 days) granulocytopenia. Gram-positive sepsis was associated with first fever in 17 (28 percent) of the 60 patients. None of 31 patients randomly assigned to receive vancomycin demonstrated gram-positive infection, whereas 16 of 22 patients randomly assigned to receive placebo subsequently had gram-positive infection (seven had sepsis, and nine had local infections; p less than 0.005). All patients with gram-positive infection were then given vancomycin, and all showed prompt clinical responses. The predominant gram-positive organism causing infection was beta-lactam-resistant Staphylococcus epidermis (19 of 44 isolates). Patients randomly assigned to receive vancomycin had more rapid resolution of first infectious fever and fewer total febrile days during the granulocytopenic course than did patients randomly assigned to receive placebo. Although vancomycin had no effect on the presence or absence of documented fungal infection, patients treated with vancomycin received empiric amphotericin B for recurrent or persistent fever later (mean of 14 days after initial antibiotic coverage was begun) than did patients receiving placebo (mean of 9.9 days; p less than 0.005), and thus received fewer total days of empiric amphotericin B therapy (mean of 16.3 days) than did patients given placebo (mean of 24.6 days; p less than 0.01). These data demonstrate that empiric use of vancomycin reduces the morbidity of gram-positive infections following intensive antileukemic therapy and decreases the need for empiric use of toxic amphotericin B.     

Candida tropicalis fungemia in a tertiary care hospital

Candida tropicalis is a frequent cause of fungemia in hospitals in Latin America. Candida albicans (33%) was the most frequently isolated species, followed by Candida parapsilosis (27%), and Candida tropicalis (24%) in tertiary care hospital in Brazil. We identified and retrospectively reviewed 27 cases of C. tropicalis fungemia that occurred at Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre from 1996 to 1999. The mean age of the patients was 32 years (range 6 months to 88 years). Eight patients (29.6%) had hematological malignancy, and four (14.8%) had solid tumors. All the patients were taking broad-spectrum antibiotics, including vancomycin for at least 7 days. Antibiotics were given through a central venous catheter for the majority of the patients (77.7%). Relevant risk factors for candidemia in our patients included neutropenia (59.2%), and use of corticosteroids (37.0%) or cytotoxic drugs (40.7%). The onset of fever was the most frequent clinical manifestation (92.5%) of fungemia. Most of the patients (81.4%) were treated with amphotericin B or fluconazole. Overall mortality was 48.1%, and 7 (53.4%) of 13 deaths occurred within 10 days of the detection of candidemia. Results of the in vitro susceptibility testing of nine isolates of C. tropicalis from seven patients did not show resistance to fluconazole and amphotericin B.C. tropicalis presents as an important cause of fungemia in oncological and nononcological patients with central venous catheters taking broad-spectrum antibiotics. Although there was no evidence of resistance of C. tropicalis to amphotericin B and fluconazole, patients treated with antifungal agents presented with a high mortality rate in the hospital setting.     

Primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients with haematologic malignancies. 2014 update of the recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society for Haematology and Oncology

Invasive fungal infections cause substantial morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, particularly in those with haematological malignancies and recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Difficulties in diagnosing invasive fungal infections and subsequent delays in treatment initiation lead to unfavourable outcomes and emphasise the importance of prophylaxis. Since the recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society for Haematology and Oncology in 2009, results of 14 additional clinical studies have been published comprising 2,899 patients and initiating this update. Key recommendations for adult patients are as follows: Posaconazole remains the drug of choice during remission-induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukaemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with graft versus host disease (AI). In the pre-engraftment period of allogeneic transplantation, several antifungals are appropriate and can be recommended with equal strength: voriconazole (BI), micafungin (BI), fluconazole (BI) and posaconazole (BII). There is poor evidence regarding antifungal prophylaxis in the post-engraftment period of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation if no steroids for treatment of graft versus host disease are required. Aerosolised liposomal amphotericin B inhalation in conjunction with fluconazole can be used in patients with prolonged neutropenia (BII).     

Contemporary antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacterial pathogens commonly associated with febrile patients with neutropenia.

One of the most challenging problems in antimicrobial chemotherapy is the effective empirical treatment of infection in patients with neutropenia. The rates of occurrence for pathogens have significantly changed (from predominance of gram-negative to gram-positive organisms) under selective pressure of broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy or prophylaxis, and novel resistance mechanisms have emerged. To address the need for appropriate monotherapy or combination regimens for patients with neutropenia, physicians must prescribe agents with a spectrum of antimicrobial activity to inhibit the major, prevalent pathogens encountered in bloodstream infection and pneumonia; in addition, these selected agents must be active against recently described resistant organisms. Data from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program indicate that several broad-spectrum agents remain highly active and can be used alone or in combinations. In most cases, the newer compounds with increased activity and spectrum against gram-positive cocci (i.e., carbapenems, cefepime, levofloxacin, and trovafloxacin) offer a greater inhibitory potential for empirical therapy among patients with neutropenia and severe infections.     

Scedosporium prolificans fungemia

Fungemia due to Scedosporium prolificans is described in a young woman with a relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Several days after starting reinduction chemotherapy, the patient presented with fever, neutropenia and blood cultures showing fungi on Gram stain. The patient died despite therapy with antifungal agents, including fluconazole and amphotericin B. Fungi grew from blood cultures, and was subsequently identified as Scedosporium prolificans.     

After empiric therapy: what to do until the granulocyte comes back

The prompt initiation of empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy when a granulocytopenic patient becomes febrile has become standard practice and has resulted in a significant reduction in the early morbidity and mortality associated with infection. Granulocytopenic patients, however, are at risk for multiple infectious episodes, particularly when the duration of neutropenia is prolonged. Accordingly, the addition of one or more antimicrobial agents to the initial empiric antibiotic regimen is often necessary to deal effectively with these second infections and to help maximize the patient's chance for survival. An organized plan that incorporates modifications of the primary antibiotic regimen (e.g., the addition of another antibiotic or an antifungal agent) into the overall management of the febrile neutropenic patient is important, especially when neutropenia lasts for more than a week.     

Intravenous and oral itraconazole versus intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate as empirical antifungal therapy for persistent fever in neutropenic patients with cancer who are receiving broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy. A randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Amphotericin B deoxycholate is currently the standard empirical antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients with cancer who have persistent fever that does not respond to antibiotic therapy. However, this treatment often causes infusion-related and metabolic toxicities, which may be dose limiting. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of itraconazole with those of amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy. DESIGN: An open randomized, controlled, multicenter trial, powered for equivalence. SETTING: 60 oncology centers in 10 countries. PATIENTS: 384 neutropenic patients with cancer who had persistent fever that did not respond to antibiotic therapy. INTERVENTION: Intravenous amphotericin B or intravenous itraconazole followed by oral itraconazole solution. MEASUREMENTS: Defervescence, breakthrough fungal infection, drug-related adverse events, and death. RESULTS: For itraconazole and amphotericin B, the median duration of therapy was 8.5 and 7 days and the median time to defervescence was 7 and 6 days, respectively. The intention-to-treat efficacy analysis of data from 360 patients showed response rates of 47% and 38% for itraconazole and amphotericin B, respectively (difference, 9.0 percentage points [95% CI, -0.8 to 19.5 percentage points]). Fewer drug-related adverse events occurred in the itraconazole group than the amphotericin B group (5% vs. 54% of patients; P = 0.001), and the rate of withdrawal because of toxicity was significantly lower with itraconazole (19% vs. 38%; P = 0.001). Significantly more amphotericin B recipients had nephrotoxicity (P < 0.001). Breakthrough fungal infections (5 patients in each group) and mortality rates (19 deaths in the itraconazole group and 25 deaths in the amphotericin B group) were similar. Sixty-five patients switched to oral itraconazole solution after receiving the intravenous formulation for a median of 9 days. CONCLUSIONS: Itraconazole and amphotericin B have at least equivalent efficacy as empirical antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients with cancer. However, itraconazole is associated with significantly less toxicity.     

Hepatosplenic candidiasis: successful treatment with fluconazole

PURPOSE: To determine if fluconazole is effective treatment for hepatosplenic candidiasis that has not resolved with amphotericin B and flucytosine treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six patients (ages 3 to 44) with acute leukemia and hepatosplenic candidiasis who did not respond to prior antifungal therapy were treated with fluconazole. RESULTS: All six patients had fever and three had nausea and vomiting; computed tomographic (CT) scan showed lucencies in the liver in six, lucencies in the spleen in five, and lucencies in the kidneys in three. Prior therapy with 1.6 to 4 g of amphotericin B in the five adults and 526 mg of amphotericin B in the child (with the addition of flucytosine in four) failed to improve clinical symptoms or lucencies in the liver, spleen, and kidneys seen on CT scan. Fluconazole was given at a dose of 200 to 400 mg daily (70 to 100 mg in the child) for 2 to 14 months. All patients had resolution of fever and other symptoms in 2 to 8 weeks. Improvement of the lesions noted on CT scan was seen in 4 to 8 weeks in all patients. Total resolution of lesions noted on CT scan occurred by 4 weeks in two patients, but took 4 to 5 months for three patients and 13 months for one patient. Three patients had relapse of their acute leukemia and two died, presumably cured of their candidiasis. Two patients underwent successful bone marrow transplantation without relapse of their candidiasis. CONCLUSION: Fluconazole appears to be useful in the treatment of hepatosplenic candidiasis that has not resolved with amphotericin B and flucytosine therapy.     

The role of fluconazole in the treatment of Candida endocarditis: a meta-analysis

The treatment of Candida infective endocarditis generally involves infected valve removal accompanied by antifungal therapy with amphotericin B or a lipid-based derivative, with or without flucytosine. While often used as chronic suppressive therapy in these patients, the precise role for fluconazole has not been established. We conducted a meta-analysis of 64 literature cases of Candida endocarditis whose management did not include valve replacement but who received fluconazole, alone or concurrently or in sequence with 1 or more other antifungal drugs.Forty-nine (77%) patients were cured (n = 44) or improved (n = 5), 4 relapsed (6%), and 11 failed (10 of whom died) (17%). Among 19 patients for whom fluconazole was administered as the sole antifungal therapy, 11 (58%) were cured or improved. In contrast, among 45 patients who received 1 or more other antifungal agents in addition to fluconazole, 38 (84%) were cured or improved (p = 0.02). Eighteen of 21 (86%) patients with native valve infection were cured or improved compared with 13 of 19 (68%) patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis (p = 0.13). The mean duration of successful fluconazole regimens was 134 days. Twenty of 21 (95%) patients who received fluconazole as chronic suppressive therapy for ≥6 months were cured. Prognosis was independent of Candida species or patient age. Among 23 historical controls managed with fluconazole-containing antifungal therapy plus valvular surgery, survival was 91%.In conclusion, fluconazole-containing, combination antifungal therapy, with or without concomitant valve replacement, and followed by prolonged, perhaps indefinite fluconazole suppression, is effective in patients with Candida endocarditis.     

Fluconazole in the treatment of hepatosplenic candidiasis.

Hepatosplenic candidiasis has increased in frequency among immunocompromised hosts. Risk factors include hematologic malignancy, intensive chemotherapy, prolonged neutropenia, and treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Patients most commonly present with abdominal pain, persistent fevers despite antibiotic therapy, and an elevated alkaline phosphatase level that is out of proportion to other hepatic enzyme levels. Gastrointestinal mucosal damage secondary to intensive chemotherapy may allow colonization with Candida species and subsequent seeding of the portal vein. Treatment has consisted of prolonged courses of amphotericin B, with mortality rates approaching 50%. We report a case of hepatosplenic candidiasis in a patient with acute myelogenous leukemia who had clinical and radiographic improvement during fluconazole therapy. Fluconazole may be an efficacious and less toxic alternative to amphotericin B.     

Candidemia in a tertiary care cancer center: in vitro susceptibility and its association with outcome of initial antifungal therapy

Since the 1990s, changing trends have been documented in species distribution and susceptibility to bloodstream infections caused by Candida species in cancer patients. However, few data are available regarding the association between in vitro antifungal susceptibility and outcome of candidemia in this patient population. We therefore evaluated the association of in vitro antifungal susceptibility and other risk factors with failure of initial antifungal therapy in cancer patients with candidemia. Candidemia cases in cancer patients from 1998 to 2001 (n = 144) were analyzed retrospectively along with their in vitro susceptibility to amphotericin B, fluconazole, and itraconazole (National Committee for Clinical and Laboratory Standards M27-A method). Patients were evaluable for outcome analysis if they received continuous unchanged therapy with either fluconazole or amphotericin B for >/=5 days. We excluded cases of mixed candidemia. In vitro susceptibility testing data of the first Candida bloodstream isolate were analyzed. Appropriate therapy was defined as that using an active in vitro antifungal for >/=5 days. For fluconazole susceptible-dose dependent Candida species, we defined appropriate therapy as a fluconazole dose of >/=600 mg/day. The Candida species distribution was 30% Candida albicans, 24% Candida glabrata, 23% Candida parapsilosis, 10% Candida krusei, 9% Candida tropicalis, and 3% other. Overall, amphotericin B was the most active agent in vitro, with only 3% of the isolates exhibiting resistance to it (>1 mg/L). Dose-dependent susceptibility to fluconazole and itraconazole was seen in 13% and 21% of the isolates, respectively, while resistance to fluconazole and itraconazole was seen in 13% and 26%, respectively.Eighty patients were evaluable for outcome analysis. In multivariate analysis, the following factors emerged as independent predictors of failure of initial antifungal therapy: leukemia (p = 0.01), bone marrow transplantation (p = 0.006), and intensive care unit stay at onset of infection (p = 0.02). Inappropriate antifungal therapy, as defined by daily dose and in vitro susceptibility, was not shown consistently to be a significant factor (it was significant in multivariate analysis, p = 0.04, but not in univariate analysis), indicating the complexity of the variables that influence the response to antifungal treatment in cancer patients with candidemia.     

Oral antifungals as prophylaxis in haematological malignancy

In the standard treatment of patients with haematological malignancy, immunosuppressive therapy produces prolonged periods of neutropenia and mucositis, which increase the risk of systemic fungal infection. In allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, this risk extends well beyond the period of neutropenia when graft-versus-host disease, and its treatment, result in prolonged lymphocytopenia. Various agents are used for antifungal prophylaxis and treatment but all have limitations: amphotericin B is restricted by the need for intravenous infusion and the occurrence of adverse events, fluconazole by its narrow spectrum of activity and the emergence of fluconazole-resistant fungi and itraconazole capsules by erratic absorption. Oral administration of antifungals has clear advantages in prophylaxis and an important current strategy is to maximize the extent and reliability of the oral bioavailability of antifungal agents. Mucositis is the main obstacle for success of strategies based on oral delivery. In this review, the ability of these new oral formulations to deliver sufficient antifungal prophylaxis is evaluated.     

Empiric treatment of fungal infections in the neutropenic host. Review of the literature and guidelines for use

Persistent fever that is refractory to broad-spectrum antibacterials is common in neutropenic patients undergoing induction chemotherapy of acute leukemia. Clinical experience suggests that many of these patients are infected with fungi. Until recently, data supporting the role of empiric antifungal therapy in this setting were limited to small groups of patients or postmortem reports. Evolving evidence in larger patient populations supports data from smaller series: febrile neutropenic patients who have failed to respond to a 4- to 7-day course of broad-spectrum antibacterials may benefit from the early initiation of antifungal therapy. Patients with fungal colonization or pulmonary infiltrates and adult patients who have not received previous fungal prophylaxis may especially benefit from the early use of antifungal drugs. Amphotericin B has been the "gold standard" for empiric antifungal therapy, although the newer azoles may be useful in certain situations.