Multimodality treatment of stage IIIA non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a critical review of the literature and strategies for future research.

PURPOSE AND DESIGN: Stage IIIA non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is composed of regionally advanced yet potentially resectable disease. Many trials have evaluated a variety of therapeutic strategies. Most have been single-arm phase II trials, although a number of comparative phase III trials have also been performed. This review critically evaluates the existing literature on the treatment of stage IIIA NSCLC, particularly the various multimodality approaches that have been used. RESULTS: A review of the existing literature does not establish the optimal treatment of stage IIIA NSCLC. Although radiation therapy alone remains the most commonly administered therapy for apparently unresectable disease, the status of radiation as a "standard" therapy can be seriously challenged based on existing data. Similarly, although a number of studies have established that surgical resection is clearly feasible in selected patients with stage IIIA disease, the efficacy of surgery also remains to be definitively established. Many studies have explored neoadjuvant chemotherapy, either in conjunction with radiation or surgery, with results that are best described as conflicting and controversial. CONCLUSIONS: Without question, randomized phase III trials are required at this time to define what is to be considered optimal treatment. An attempt is made to define the most important questions that should be addressed in future phase III trials. Additionally, a number of study designs are suggested to best answer the therapeutic questions posed.     

Concurrent docetaxel and thoracic radiation in non-small-cell lung cancer

Locally advanced (stages IIIA and IIIB) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents approximately 25% of new cases of NSCLC diagnosed annually. The treatment strategy for these patients involves combined-modality therapy with chemotherapy and thoracic radiation. Furthermore, a subset of patients with stage IIIA disease undergo surgical resection. Docetaxel is a chemotherapy agent with activity in both first- and second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. Several recent studies have also incorporated docetaxel in the treatment of patients with stage III NSCLC as neoadjuvant therapy, alone or in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin and thoracic radiation. Docetaxel has also been used as consolidation therapy. This review will summarize the data to date on the use of docetaxel and thoracic radiation in the treatment of patients with stage III NSCLC.     

Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Management in England

AimsWe present the first analysis of the management and outcomes of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) conducted in England using National Lung Cancer Audit data.Materials and methodsPatients diagnosed with stage III NSCLC in 2016 were identified. Linked datasets (including Hospital Episode Statistics, the National Radiotherapy Dataset, the Systemic Anti-Cancer Dataset, pathology reports and death certificate data) were used to categorise the treatment received. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were obtained, with survival defined from the date of diagnosis to the date of death.ResultsIn total, 6276 cases of stage III NSCLC were analysed: 3827 stage IIIA and 2449 stage IIIB; 1047 (17%) patients were treated with radical radiotherapy with 676 (11%) of these also receiving chemotherapy. Twenty per cent of patients with stage IIIA disease underwent surgery, with half of these also receiving chemotherapy, predominantly delivered in the adjuvant setting. Of note, 2148 (34%) patients received palliative-intent treatment and 2265 (36%) received no active anti-cancer treatment. The 1-year survival was 32.9% (37.4% for stage IIIA), with the highest survival seen for those patients receiving chemotherapy and surgery.ConclusionsWe highlight important gaps in the optimal care of patients with stage III NSCLC in England. Multimodality treatment with either surgery or radical radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy was delivered to less than one-fifth of patients, even though these regimens are considered optimal. Timely access to specialist resources and staff, the practice of effective shared decision making and challenging preconceptions have the potential to optimise management.     

Postoperative radiotherapy increases locoregional control of patients with stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in patients with Stage IIB and Stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed the treatment records of 98 patients (58 men and 40 women; median age 61 years, range 31-91) with Stage IIB and Stage IIIA NSCLC who were treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery at our institution between January 1990 and December 2000. Patients were grouped by treatment (chemotherapy/surgery alone vs. chemotherapy/surgery/RT), by disease stage and nodal classification. The rates of local control (LC), disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of the 98 patients, 40 had Stage IIB and 58 had Stage IIIA. The clinical disease stage and N stage were significantly greater in those patients who underwent RT than in those who did not; however, no statistically significant differences were identified in the additional characteristics between those receiving and not receiving RT within each stage or nodal group. The overall 5-year actuarial LC rate was 81% in the RT group and 54% in the chemotherapy/surgery-alone group (p = 0.07). Postoperative RT significantly improved the 5-year LC rate in patients with Stage IIIA disease (from 35% to 82%, p = 0.01). Postoperative RT did not significantly improve the 5-year OS rate (30% with RT vs. 49% without) for all patients or for patients with Stage IIIA disease. The disease-specific survival and disease-free survival rates did not differ between the treatment groups. Patients who responded to induction chemotherapy had a significantly greater 5-year OS rate (49%) than did those with stable or progressive disease (22%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Postoperative RT in patients with Stage IIIA NSCLC treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery significantly improved LC without improving OS. Significantly improved survival was observed in all patients who responded to induction chemotherapy compared with those with stable or progressive disease.     

Induction chemotherapy for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in American men and women. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 85% of these cases. Although surgery is the best curative approach for resectable NSCLC, long-term survival for patients with operable disease remains poor. More than half of patients who initially present with stage I to IIIA disease experience relapse of metastatic disease. Postoperative adjuvant therapy has been evaluated in several randomized trials, and provides a survival benefit. It appears reasonable to look to induction chemotherapy, or preoperative chemotherapy, to provide a similar improvement in survival with early treatment of micrometastatic disease. Multiple trials of induction therapy have been carried out with encouraging results. The use of various induction regimens with chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy for stage IIIA NSCLC is under investigation. Randomized trials are under way to better define the role of induction therapy in the multimodality treatment of NSCLC.     

Maintenance and Consolidation Therapy in Patients with Unresectable Stage III/IV Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer

Globally, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer‐related mortality. Current chemotherapy combinations for the first‐line treatment of advanced disease (stage IIIB with malignant pleural effusion/stage IV) and chemoradiotherapy regimens for the treatment of unresectable locally advanced disease (stage IIIA and IIIB without malignant pleural effusion) appear to have reached an efficacy plateau. The addition of new compounds including targeted agents to standard first‐line cytotoxic doublets, administered concurrently and/or as maintenance therapy in patients who have not experienced disease progression after such treatment, has been shown to improve efficacy beyond this plateau in patients with advanced disease. However, to date, such approaches have been less successful in the treatment of patients with unresectable locally advanced stage III disease. The purpose of this review is to summarize the data from recent randomized phase III studies involving agents administered as maintenance or consolidation therapy in the treatment of unresectable stage III/IV non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A possible alternative approach to the use of cytotoxic or molecularly targeted agents in this setting is the administration of therapeutic anticancer vaccines, which are designed to stimulate a host immunological response against the tumor. Current data in relation to the potential of vaccine therapy for NSCLC are therefore also reviewed, with a particular focus on belagenpumatucel‐L and L‐BLP25 vaccines, which are currently undergoing phase III evaluation as maintenance therapies in patients with unresectable stage III/IV NSCLC who have tumor control following first‐line therapy.     

Chemotherapy in stage I+II non-small cell lung cancer

Although surgical resection offers the best chance for long-term survival for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the limited number of resectable patients and the presence of micrometastatic disease is limiting the effectiveness of this modality as sole treatment. Results of randomized trials demonstrated a survival benefit for preoperative (neoadjuvant) cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA NSCLC compared to surgery alone. In stage I+II NSCLC preoperative chemotherapy, although still experimental, clearly offers encouraging results. However, there is no evidence of its superiority over adjuvant chemotherapy. Moreover, for adjuvant therapy a benefit has not been established yet. Possibly current ongoing or recently finished trials may change the recommendations on adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy for completely resected or resectable early disease in the future.     

Pre-operative chemotherapy in early stage resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized feasibility study justifying a multicentre phase III trial

Surgical resection offers the best chance for cure for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC, stage I, II, IIIA), but the 5-year survival rates are only moderate, with systemic relapse being the major cause of death. Pre-operative (neo-adjuvant) chemotherapy has shown promise in small trials restricted to stage IIIA patients. We believe similar trials are now appropriate in all stages of operable lung cancer. A feasibility study was performed in 22 patients with early stage (IB, II, IIIA) resectable NSCLC; randomized to either three cycles of chemotherapy [mitomycin-C 8 mg m(-2), vinblastine 6 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 50 mg m(-2) (MVP)] followed by surgery (n = 11), or to surgery alone. Of 40 eligible patients, 22 agreed to participate (feasibility 55%) and all complied with the full treatment schedule. All symptomatic patients achieved either complete (50%) or partial (50%) relief of tumour-related symptoms with pre-operative chemotherapy. Fifty-five per cent achieved objective tumour response, and a further 27% minor tumour shrinkage; none had progressive disease. Partial pathological response was seen in 50%. No severe (WHO grade III-IV) toxicities occurred. No significant deterioration in quality of life was detected during chemotherapy. Pre-operative MVP chemotherapy is feasible in early stage NSCLC, and this study has now been initiated as a UK-wide Medical Research Council phase III trial.     

Sequential combined modality therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

These pilot trials clearly demonstrate the feasibility of administering neoadjuvant chemotherapy to patients with stage III NSCLC. Response rates in most of these trials reach or exceed 50%, indicating increased activity of chemotherapy in NSCLC when used at an earlier time in the natural history of the disease, as has been shown in other diseases. In addition, histologic confirmation of complete response can occasionally be achieved. Most of the studies reviewed here have included patients with unresectable disease, who would now frequently be classified as stage IIIB. For these patient cohorts the survival data reported are frequently disappointing, suggesting that the high response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy do not necessarily translate into improved survival of the patients. On the other hand, where patients with stage IIIA disease were treated and surgery was included in the overall treatment plan, the survival data are more encouraging. Although most chemotherapy regimens have included cisplatin, it is not clear which combination of drugs and which schedules are superior. Clinical research, therefore, clearly needs to continue to focus on the development of innovative drug combinations and the evaluation of new drugs in NSCLC in an attempt to further increase overall and complete response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. At the same time, randomized studies are needed to unequivocally establish whether the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to standard therapy improves survival for stage IIIA and/or stage IIIB NSCLC as compared with standard therapy alone. Results from one such randomized study, which was conducted by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB), have recently been reported. One-hundred and eighty patients with unresectable NSCLC were randomized to receive radiotherapy alone or two cycles of cisplatin and vinblastine followed by radiotherapy. One-hundred and fifty-five eligible patients were analyzed for response. Of 77 patients receiving radiotherapy alone, 43% responded, including 16% with a complete response. Of 78 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 56% responded to both treatment modalities, including 19% with complete response. With a median follow-up of 19 months, the median survival was 16.5 months for patients receiving combined modality therapy and 8.5 months for patients receiving radiotherapy alone. The pattern of relapse was identical in both study arms, showing a predominance of local recurrence or of combined local and distant recurrence, whereas few patients experienced distant disease progression alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

EGF receptor as a therapeutic target

Surgery alone is currently still accepted "standard of care" for patients with operable NSCLC, this includes stages IA and IIB, as well as selected early subsets of IIIA disease. In more advanced and inoperable stage III disease, combinations of chemotherapy and radiotherapy remain the standard treatment approach for patients with good performance status. The role of surgery following induction therapy in these advanced stage III patients is at the moment not conclusively defined. More evidence from randomized trials is clearly needed to tailor treatment for the large number of patients that present in these locally advanced stages. Enrollment of patients into ongoing prospective clinical trials should be encouraged, whenever possible, to further define prognostic factors and improve multimodality strategies in this clinical setting.     

Survival Following Surgery with or without Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage I–IIIA Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: An East Asian Population‐Based Study

Background.

Asian ethnicity is associated with a distinct molecular etiology, treatment response, and survival outcome among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study examines the survival impact of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy for Asian patients with stage I–IIIA NSCLC.

Methods.

This study recruited patients aged ≥18 years with histologically proven stage IA–IIIA NSCLC registered in the Taiwan Cancer Registry database in January 2004 to December 2007. Platinum-containing adjuvant chemotherapy had to be started within 90 days of the primary surgery. Kaplan–Meier survival curves, log-rank tests, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to assess the influence of various risk factors on survival time.

Results.

This study included 2,231 patients with stage IA–IIIA NSCLC who underwent primary surgery with a clear surgical margin. The percentages of all causes of death were significantly lower for the chemotherapy group for both stage II and stage IIIA patients. Multivariate analysis identified platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy as an independent prognostic factor for the overall survival outcome of stage II (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39–0.94; p = .024) and IIIA (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52–0.96; p = .029) patients. Among these patients, those who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a superior overall survival outcome for both genders, for the subgroup of patients aged ≥70 years, and for those with adenocarcinoma.

Conclusion.

Platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in the treatment plan for Asian patients with resected stage II and stage IIIA NSCLC.     

Medical treatment for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises a heterogeneous group of diseases with varying prognoses.In addition,the definitions of "resectable" or "unresectable" differ among countries and investigators. Therefore,no clear-cut consensus regarding the management of this disease has been established worldwide as of yet. Single-modality treatments such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery alone show disappointing results, and therefore combined-modality treatments have been investigated for this disease. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy plus concurrent radiotherapy is one of the standard treatments for good-risk patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC. However, when including new agents for chemoradiotherapy, no optimal treatment has been established. A full dose of chemotherapy including new agents plus concurrent radiotherapy is considered impossible due to excessive toxicity. Consequently, split or reduced doses of chemotherapy are preferred in this setting. On the other hand, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, especially platinum-based combination chemotherapy,prolongs survival in patients with completely resected stage III NSCLC. However,the role of the addition of surgery to chemoradiotherapy and the role of molecular-target drugs are still controversial in the management of stage III NSCLC. In the future, many more well-designed clinical trials are warranted to improve the treatment outcome for stage III NSCLC.     

Randomized trial of surgery versus radiotherapy in patients with stage IIIA (N2) non small-cell lung cancer after a response to induction chemotherapy. EORTC 08941

Combined modality treatment of patients with stage III non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has recently become widely accepted. Standard combinations are neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy or concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The effect of combined modality treatment on survival is dependent on both the efficacy of chemotherapy to eradicate micrometastases and optimal local control. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Lung Cancer Cooperative Group has chosen to investigate in a comparative way the side effects and the effect on survival of radiotherapy versus surgery in stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC.     

不可切除Ⅲ A(N2)期非小细胞肺癌的术前化疗

目的探讨不能切除的ⅢA（N2）期非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）的治疗方法。方法1999年1月至2002年12月,76例不可切除ⅢA（N2）期NSCLC患者接受诺维苯（NVB,25mg／m^23,第1,5天）加卡铂（300mg／m^2,第1天）2个周期的化疗,第二周期化疗后3周重新评估能否手术切除。对化疗效果达到部分有效（PR）或完全有效（CR）、估计能完全切除的64例患者行剖胸探查术;对化疗后评价为稳定（SD）和进展（PD）的12例患者行放疗。64例手术患者中,完全切除（肺叶或全肺切除加纵隔淋巴结清扫术,至少达到R3水平）56例,术后继续给予诺维苯加卡铂化疗2个周期;不完全切除8例,另加局部放疗。结果76例不可切除的ⅢA（N2）期NSCLC经诱导化疗后手术或放疗,中位生存期为18．6个月,1,2,3年生存率分别为64．2％、39．4％和25．6％。其中完全切除患者的中位生存期为28．2个月,1,2,3年生存率分别为70．4％、52．5％和38．6％。结论对不可切除的局部晚期NSCLC,如诱导化疗后可以手术,应首选外科治疗。     

Induction chemotherapy with mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin for stage III unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the Toronto Phase II Trial.

PURPOSE: The 5-year survival rates with surgical resection for preoperatively identified stage IIIA N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are less than 10%. A pilot study of mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin (MVP) induction chemotherapy was undertaken in an attempt to improve the curative potential of surgery in this group of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with mediastinoscopy stage IIIA N2 NSCLC received two cycles of MVP. Responding patients underwent thoracotomy for resection and two further courses of MVP. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 64% (25 of 39) with three complete and 22 partial responses. Twenty-two patients were resected, which included a radical mediastinal node dissection. Eighteen resections were complete and four were incomplete. Pathologically, three patients (7.7%) had no tumor remaining. Toxicity included two postoperative deaths secondary to a bronchopleural (BP) fistula, mitomycin pulmonary toxicity in two patients, and septic deaths in four patients. Twenty-eight patients have died; 20 have recurrent or progressive disease. Eight of the 18 patients completely resected have recurred, with a median time to recurrence of 20.6 months. Sites of recurrence include two locoregional, five distant (two in brain), and one in both. Median survival of all 39 patients is 18.6 months, with a 3-year survival of 26%. The median survival for those patients completely resected was 29.7 months with a 3-year survival of 40%. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude (1) that MVP is an effective but toxic chemotherapeutic regimen for limited NSCLC; (2) the median survival seems to be prolonged; and (3) the role of induction chemotherapy followed by surgery in stage IIIA N2 NSCLC requires a phase III randomized trial to compare it with other treatment modalities.     

Multidisciplinary consensus statement on the clinical management of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a very heterogeneous disease that encompasses patients with resected, potentially resectable and unresectable tumours. To improve the prognostic capacity of the TNM classification, it has been agreed to divide stage III into sub-stages IIIA, IIIB and IIIC that have very different 5-year survival rates (36, 26 and 13%, respectively). Currently, it is considered that both staging and optimal treatment of stage III NSCLC requires the joint work of a multidisciplinary team of expert physicians within the tumour committee. To improve the care of patients with stage III NSCLC, different scientific societies involved in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease have agreed to issue a series of recommendations that can contribute to homogenise the management of this disease, and ultimately to improve patient care.

     

Randomised study of adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected p-stage I-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

We evaluated the therapeutic usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We also examined the relation between DNA ploidy pattern and the response to chemotherapy. A total of 267 patients with NSCLC (pathologically documented stage I, II, or IIIA) underwent complete resection, and DNA ploidy pattern was analysed. Patients with stage I disease (n=172) were randomly assigned to receive surgery alone (group A) or surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (UFT (oral anti-cancer drug, a combination of Uracil and Tegaful) 400 mg day-1 for 1 year after surgery; group B). Stage II or IIIA disease patients (n=95) were randomly assigned to surgery alone (group C) or surgery followed by chemotherapy (two 28-day courses of cisplatin 80 mg m-2 on day 1 plus vindesine 3 mg m-2 on days 1 and 8, followed by UFT 400 mg day-1 for at least 1 year; group D). Eight-year overall survival rate in patients with stage I disease was 74.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 64.4-84.0%) in group B and 57.6% (95% CI: 46.4-68.8%) in group A (P=0.045 by log-rank test). In patients with stage II and IIIA disease, no difference was found between groups C and D. Analysis according to DNA ploidy pattern revealed no difference between the groups. Postoperative chemotherapy with UFT was suggested to be useful in patients with completely resected stage I NSCLC. No difference was seen in relation to DNA pattern in any treatment group.     

Randomized controlled trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinorelbine in patients with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer in China

Aim:   The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of cisplatin plus vinorelbine as a regimen of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the improvement of surgical resectability and survival in Chinese patients with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods:   Fifty-six patients with stage IIIA NSCLC were randomly assigned to undergo either surgery preceded by two cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin plus vinorelbine (the neoadjuvant chemotherapy arm) or immediate surgery (the primary surgery arm). The patients who had a complete resection received two to four cycles of chemotherapy, and those with incomplete resection received radiotherapy followed by two cycles of chemotherapy after surgery.
Results:   The overall response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 53.6%, with a complete response of 7.1%. A pathological complete response was seen in two patients (8%). The complete resection rates were 78.6% in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy arm and 60.7% in the primary surgery arm. The median overall survival and median disease-free survival was 30 months and 24 months, respectively, in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy arm as compared to 16 months and 11 months in the primary surgery arm ( P  = 0.04 and P  = 0.048). The 3-year and 5-year survival rate was 49.7% and 31.9%, respectively, for the neoadjuvant chemotherapy arm and 29.2% and 3.6% for the primary surgery arm.
Conclusion:   Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin plus vinorelbine regimen is effective and tolerable and can improve the overall survival and disease-free survival time in Chinese patients with stage IIIA NSCLC.     

Role of surgery following induction therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Over the last 30 years neoadjuvant treatment of stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) followed by surgical resection for stage IIIB disease has significantly improved the overall results of treatment for patients with stage III NSCLC as well as for those with locally invasive tumors. Different chemotherapy regimens have been used, although in most studies some combination of drugs that include cisplatin is the standard. Radiation when given as part of the induction protocol appears to offer a higher rate of resection and complete resection, and higher doses of radiation are associated with better nodal downstaging. Resection in patients with persistent N2 disease and pneumonectomy following induction therapy remain controversial. Resection in patients with persistent N2 disease and pneumonectomy following induction therapy remain controversial.     

Consensus development conference on the medical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: treatment of the early stages

Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but more than 80% of recurrences occur within 2 years from radical surgery. The pattern of recurrence may differ by histology with more local recurrences seen for patients with squamous cell carcinoma and more distant metastases seen in patients with adenocarcinoma. A number of studies demonstrate that dissemination of cancer cells at levels much below those detected by any current available imaging techniques, including PET scanning also, affect prognosis of patients with clinical early-stage NSCLC. The current clinical evidence does not recommend adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in completely resected stage I-II-IIIA for N1. There are few randomised trials available for analysis of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy involving patients with resectable stage III disease; overall these trials suggest that induction chemotherapy (with or without radiation) improves survival, particularly in those patients who undergo significant downstaging. Heterogeneous study populations limit the ability to define the optimal patient population who would most benefit from this approach. There is no conclusive evidence that neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in early NSCLC is associated with an increased post surgical morbility and mortality. Additional trials are needed. More recently neo-adjuvant chemotherapy has been tested in resectable stage I-II NSCLC and proved to be feasible and better tolerated than adjuvant chemotherapy. Several randomised trials are currently ongoing. In the next future the role of targeted biological therapies as agents acting on minimal residual disease should be explored.