Comparative early and midterm results of open juxtarenal and infrarenal aneurysm repair

Background and aims Since the introduction of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for aortic aneurysms, the number of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms (JRA) has been growing steadily due to selection bias (neck morphology for EVAR). This case-match study compares the perioperative outcome and midterm results of suprarenally clamped JRA with infrarenal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Methods From 1997 to 2004, patients who received open surgery with suprarenal clamping for JRA were included in the study and compared to matched patients with infrarenal clamping (AAA). Measurements analyzed were the in-hospital mortality and morbidity. Midterm results were obtained through clinical investigation and magnetic resonance angiography imaging. Results Thirty-five patients (mean age, 68.4 years; 30 male and 5 female) received suprarenal cross-clamping for JRA. The overall in-hospital mortality for JRA and for the controls (AAA) with elective aortic repair was 4.5% (6.1% JRA; 3% AAA, p = 0.058). The morbidity of JRA was elevated according to the rate of pulmonary complications (p = 0.021) and the need for re-operation (p = 0.019). The mean follow-up time was 2.3 years (range, 8–96 months). At follow-up, 28 patients (80%) from the JRA group and 29 patients from the AAA group (82.9%) were alive. Conclusion Open aortic surgery for JRA with the need for suprarenal cross-clamping shows a slightly elevated in-hospital mortality rate without statistical significance and equal midterm mortality results in comparison with infrarenally clamped aortic aneurysms.     

Contemporary results of juxtarenal aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE: The increasing use of aortic endografts predictably will add to the complexity of open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and, therefore, the proportion of surgically treated infrarenal AAAs that are juxtarenal in location (JRA) will grow. This study reviews a single-center experience with JRAs. METHODS: Between June 1994 and December 2000, 138 patients underwent elective repair of a JRA, comprising 16.1% of 859 consecutive asymptomatic and intact symptomatic nonruptured infrarenal AAAs repaired over the same period. All patients with JRA needed proximal suprarenal clamping (SRC) or supravisceral (SVC) clamping. Patient demographics, selected risk factors, and operative details were recorded. Univariate analyses of selected risk factors for an adverse perioperative event were assessed, and multivariate analyses were performed with linear and logistic regression with backwards selection. RESULTS: SRC was used in 95 patients (69%), and 43 patients (31%) underwent SVC. The mortality rate was 5.1% (7/138) for JRA repair, and 2.8% (20/720) for infrarenal AAA repair (P =.03). The mortality rate was significantly greater for those patients who received SVC compared with SRC (11.6% versus 2.1%; P =.02). Multivariate analysis identified SVC position as the only independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 6.1; 95% CI, 1.1 to 32.9; P =.035). Transient renal insufficiency occurred in 39 patients (28.3%), but only eight patients (5.8%) needed dialysis. Patients who had SVC had a significantly greater rate of renal insufficiency than those who received SRC (41.9% versus 22.1%; P =.02). Multivariate analysis showed SVC position (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.4 to 7.8; P =.008), diabetes (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 12.9; P =.04), and preoperative renal insufficiency (OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 2.2 to 15.4; P <.001) were independent predictors of postoperative renal insufficiency. Renal ischemia during proximal clamping cannot alone explain renal complications because clamp time was shorter in patients with SVC (24.9 +/- 2.4 minutes versus 32.2 +/- 1.5 minutes; P =.009). CONCLUSION: JRA repair can be accomplished with a low mortality rate, but a more proximal clamp position may adversely affect outcome in these patients. Postoperative renal insufficiency is related to diabetes, preoperative renal insufficiency, and SVC position. These results suggest SRC is safer than SVC for proximal aortic clamp control of JRAs. Although clamp level must be tailored to patient anatomy, outcome may be improved if the clamp level can be kept distal to the superior mesenteric artery origin.     

Results of supraceliac aortic clamping in the difficult elective resection of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm

We have used clamping of the aorta above the celiac axis (SC) in 30 of 431 elective resections of infrainguinal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) during the past five years as an alternative to a difficult aortic cuff dissection. The results of SC clamping in these 30 patients are compared with the results of 379 routine aneurysm resections with infrarenal (IR) clamping and 22 additional aneurysm resections where the clamp was placed immediately above the renal arteries. These difficult cuff dissections occurred in 12 patients with inflammatory AAA, in 11 patients with juxtarenal AAA, and in seven patients with recurrent or noninfected false AAA of the proximal cuff. Patients with ruptured or suprarenal aneurysms and those undergoing combined operation for a visceral ischemic syndrome and an aneurysm were excluded from this study. Patients with SC clamping had similar operative mortality rates, comparable renal function, and frequency of cardiac events as patients with IR clamping. Blood loss was slightly higher in the SC group (p = 0.07) and serum aspartate amino transferase (AST) levels were three times higher than in the IR group; however, this was of no clinical significance. In contrast, those 22 patients whose aortas were clamped immediately above the renal arteries (AR) had higher perioperative mortality rates (2% IR, 3% SC vs 32% AR) and a higher incidence of kidney failure requiring dialysis (1% IR, 3% SC vs 23% AR). The mean values of serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen were also significantly higher in the AR group when compared with both the IR and the SC groups (IR: 25 and 1.5 mg/dl, respectively; SC: 27 and 1.8 mg/dl; AR: 41 and 3.5 mg/dl). The single most important risk factor accounting for the differences between clamping above the celiac artery and clamping above the renal arteries was the presence of atherosclerotic debris in the nonaneurysmal, juxtarenal aortic segment. Clamping the aorta with juxtarenal atherosclerosis caused either atheroembolization to kidneys, legs, and intestine or injury to the aorta, renal arteries, or both; it was the cause of morbidity in all five cases of kidney failure requiring dialysis and accounted for all seven of the deaths in the AR group. SC clamping does not add risk to the patient undergoing resection of an infrarenal AAA and is the preferred method of achieving proximal control of the infrarenal aorta when a a hazardous cuff dissection is likely.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Renal dysfunction and prolonged visceral ischaemia increase mortality rate after suprarenal aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND: Elective juxtarenal abdominal aneurysm repair has a significantly lower mortality rate than suprarenal repair. Identification of factors affecting outcome may lead to a reduction in mortality rate for suprarenal repair. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively between 1993 and 2000 for 130 patients who underwent type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysm (TAA) repair and 44 patients who had juxtarenal aneurysm (JRA) repair. Preoperative risk factors and operative details were compared between groups and related to outcome after TAA repair (there were only two deaths in the JRA group). RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher following TAA repair (20.0 per cent; 26 of 130 patients) than JRA repair (4.5 per cent; two of 44). Raised serum creatinine concentration was the only preoperative factor (P = 0.013) and visceral ischaemia the only significant operative factor (P = 0.001) that affected mortality after TAA repair. CONCLUSION: JRA repair was performed with similar risks to those of infrarenal aneurysm repair. Impaired preoperative renal function was related to death following TAA repair and conservative treatment should be considered for patients with a serum creatinine level above 180 micromol/l. Reducing the duration of visceral ischaemia might improve outcome.     

237例肾动脉水平以下腹主动脉瘤手术治疗经验

目的提高腹主动脉瘤手术的安全性。方法总结了自１９６０年１月到１９９６年１２月２３７例肾动脉水平以下腹主动脉瘤切除人造血管移植手术治疗的经验。结果随着腹膜后途径的应用,动脉瘤近端血流控制、动脉瘤切除以及缝合修补等方法的改进,使手术的危险性明显降低,手术时间缩短（２～３ｈ）。随访２２７例,手术死亡率低（３．８％）。５年存活率达７４．４％。结论手术技术和麻醉监护的进步,使腹主动脉瘤修补手术变得更迅速、安全和方便。     

Analysis of medical risk factors and outcomes in patients undergoing open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE: The emergence of endovascular repair (ER) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has provided surgeons with a new technique that should ideally improve patient outcomes. To more accurately characterize the advantages of ER versus traditional/open AAA repair (TOR), we compared the preoperative medical risk factors (PMRFs) and perioperative outcomes (PO) of those patients undergoing elective treatment of infrarenal AAA with ER and TOR over a recent 18-month period at our center. METHODS: Through our institutional vascular surgery patient registry, all patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair of any type between December 1999 and June 2001 were identified. Only those patients undergoing elective infrarenal AAA repair were analyzed. Hospital records were examined for all patients, and PMRF and PO were assessed via Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery reporting guidelines. Student t, chi(2), Fisher exact, or Wilcoxon rank sum tests were applied where appropriate to determine differences among PMRF and PO according to method of aneurysm repair. RESULTS: During the 18-month study period, a total of 199 aortic aneurysms were repaired at our institution. Ninety-nine elective infrarenal AAA repairs made up the study cohort (ER, n = 33; TOR, n = 66). When examined by method of aneurysm repair, no differences existed in demographics or AAA size. Patients undergoing ER had a significantly greater degree of preoperative pulmonary comorbidity than patients undergoing TOR (P <.001). However, no differences existed in terms of American Society of Anesthesiologists classification or cardiac (P =.52), cerebrovascular (P =.44), diabetic (P =.51), hypertensive (P =.90), hyperlipidemia (P =.91) or renal (P =.23) comorbidities between the two groups. Perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were also not significantly different by method of repair. ER was associated with shorter operative time, intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay (P <.0001). However, subsequent operative procedures related to the AAA repair were performed more frequently after ER (TOR = 1.5% versus ER = 15.2%; P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ER offers improvements in hospital convalescent and operating room times but no beneficial impact on overall morbidity and mortality rates when similar PMRFs exist, especially when used at medical centers where low morbidity and mortality rates are already established for TOR. Other centers performing ER should undertake such an analysis to assess its impact on their patients.     

Suprarenal aortic cross-clamping in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

INTRODUCTION: this retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate whether suprarenal aortic cross-clamping increased the perioperative mortality and morbidity as compared to infrarenal clamping, in order to create the rationale for a more extensive application of this apparently more traumatic manoeuvre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: in a series of 734 elective aortic substitutions for abdominal aneurysm (AA), performed consecutively from January 1992 to June 1999, aortic cross-clamping was performed at a suprarenal level in 56 juxtarenal aneurysms, i.e. aneurysms extending to the lower edge of the renal arteries (8%, Group 1), and at an infrarenal level in 634 subrenal aneurysms (92%, Group 2). When analysing preoperative data, the diameter of aneurysms was larger in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p<0. 005). No significant differences were found between the two groups as regards age, sex, postinfarction cardiomyopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic renal insufficiency and ASA classification of operative risks. RESULTS: the average time of renal exclusion in the juxtarenal aneurysms was 20 min (range 12-35 min). There is no difference between the two groups as regards the time of aortic clamping (mean 50 vs. 60 min) or the need for homologous blood transfusion (7% vs. 11% of patients). Perioperative (30 days) mortality did not differ: 3.6% vs. 1.9% (n.s.); nor did the incidence of acute myocardial infarction (3.6% vs. 2.3%). Renal function deteriorated in 8 (14%) vs. 0 (0%) (p<0.001) and 1 patient (2%) required permanent dialysis, as compared to 0% in Group 2. The incidence of ischaemic colitis was also significantly higher in Group 1 (7%) than in Group 2 (2%, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: this data shows that suprarenal clamping, which is necessary for the radical treatment of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms, can be performed with a low risk.     

Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair after prior aortic surgery

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the morbidity and mortality of surgery for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) in patients with prior aortic surgery are increased. METHODS: The results for all patients undergoing operation for TAAA at a single institution were reviewed. RESULTS: Over a 10-year interval, 279 patients (136 women and 143 men) underwent aortic replacement for TAAA. The mean patient age was 68 years (range, 34-90). The extent of aortic replacement was relatively evenly distributed: type I (91), type II (54), type III (78), or type IV (56). Of these 279 patients, 76 (27%) had undergone prior aortic surgery. Prior infrarenal AAA was the most common prior procedure (56, 20%). Reoperation for prior failed TAAA repair was performed in 20 (7%) patients. A history of Marfan syndrome was highly associated with the need for remedial TAAA procedures (P <.0001). Overall 30-day mortality was 11.4% (32). Mortality was independent of prior aortic surgery (P =.98), prior AAA (P =.84), prior TAAA (P =.61), and gender (P =.18). Postoperative complications were seen in 67 (24%) patients and were more likely in patients who had undergone prior AAA surgery (P =.008). TAAA repair in patients with recurrent TAAA was not associated with higher morbidity (P =.33). Paraplegia (10) occurred in type I (3), type II (2), and type III (5) aneurysms but not in type IV (0), and its development was associated with higher mortality (P =.01). Prior aortic surgery was not found to be predictive of paraplegia (P =.90), although 30% of patients who developed paraplegia had a history of prior AAA repair. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic reoperation for TAAA is required in a significant number of patients, particularly those with Marfan syndrome. Therefore, ongoing surveillance of the residual aorta is mandatory. Postoperative complications are more likely to occur in patients after prior infrarenal aortic replacement, but mortality is not significantly increased. Special technical considerations exist for remedial procedures after failed TAAA repair to provide protection for the spinal cord, kidneys, and viscera. Patients with failed TAAA procedures or progression of aneurysmal extent should be offered reoperation when indicated.     

Iliorenal artery bypass grafting to facilitate endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Effective endovascular repair of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) requires adequate proximal and distal landing zones to allow secure endograft attachment. We report a patient with an infrarenal AAA originating 3 mm below the left renal artery with cardiac morbidity that precluded open AAA repair. Left renal artery relocation with retroperitoneal iliorenal bypass grafting was performed to lengthen the proximal landing zone, which facilitated successful endovascular AAA repair. Postoperative surveillance after 3 years showed aneurysm reduction with a patent iliorenal bypass graft. This case underscores the utility of a combined open and endovascular approach in treatment of a challenging aortic aneurysm.     

肾动脉下腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗后并发症的防治

目的　总结肾动脉下腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗后常见并发症的预防与处理。　方法对已施行腔内治疗的 71例肾下腹主动脉瘤患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析 ,讨论常见并发症发生的原因、处理、结果及预后。　结果　 71例接受腔内治疗的肾动脉下腹主动脉瘤患者技术成功率1 0 0 % ,无中转开腹手术者。原发性内漏 8例 ,神经并发症合并急性血栓形成 1例。一过性缺血性肠炎 2例。无肾动脉梗死、肢体栓塞等并发症。平均随访时间 (2 6± 5)个月。围手术期病死率 1 3 % (1 /71 ) ,总病死率 4 2 % (3/ 71 )。死亡原因 2例为急性心肌梗死 ,1例为急性心功能衰竭。随访过程中发现 3例原发性内漏转为持续性内漏 ,另发现继发性内漏 4例。本组患者 1个月后内漏发生率 9 8%(7/ 71 )。 2例继发性Ⅰ型内漏随访中瘤体增大 ,1例进行二期腔内治疗。　结论　动脉瘤的腔内治疗具有创伤小、技术操作可行、效果肯定的优点 ,内漏血是该技术主要并发症。对漏血量及瘤体有增大趋势的内漏应积极处理     

Surgical Repair of Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and safety of Suprarenal Aortic Clamping

Background

Juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) comprises 15–20% of all AAAs and often requires open surgical repair (OSR) due to anatomical limitations associated with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), particularly in the case of hostile proximal necks. This study aimed to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes of suprarenal clamping during OSR of juxtarenal AAAs and compare the outcomes of this technique with those of infrarenal clamping for AAAs.

Methods

Between January 1 2014, and December 31 2016, 289 consecutive patients aged ≥40 years underwent primary repair for infrarenal AAAs, including 141 OSRs and 148 EVARs. Of the 141 patients, 20 were excluded and totally, 121 patients were included.

Results

All patients had fusiform-type AAAs and were divided into infrarenal (N = 98) or suprarenal (N=23) clamp groups. The mean follow-up period was 51.4 months (95% CI: 48.6–54.2). Mean survival time was 51.4 months (95% CI: 48.6–54.2). Thirty-day mortality was 0.8%, and there was no significant difference between two groups (P > .999). Renal complication in infrarenal clamp group was 4.1% and suprarenal clamp group was 4.3% (P > .999). Old age (HR: 1.084; 95% CI: 1.025–1.147; P=.005) and high ASA score (HR: 2.361; 95% CI: 1.225–4.553; P = .010) were substantially associated with in-hospital complications.

Conclusions

Although endovascular procedures for repairing juxtarenal AAAs, such as fenestrated EVAR, have been developed, surgical repair is the standard treatment for juxtarenal AAAs. Morbidity and mortality due to open surgery were not higher in the juxtarenal AAA group than in the infrarenal AAA group. Therefore, need for suprarenal clamp should not preclude OSR and also there is continued need for training in surgical exposure of juxtarenal AAA and OSR.

     

Open repair for pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: the strategy and pitfalls for safe surgery

Pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (PRAAA) includes two types of AAA : juxtarenal (JRAAA) and suprarenal (SRAAA). JRAAA is defined as aneurysms that extend up to but do not involve the renal arteries, necessitating suprarenal aortic clamping for repair. SRAAA is defined as aneurysms that extend up to the superior mesenteric artery, involving one or both renal arteries to be repaired. The surgical repair of PRAAAs requires more extensive aortic exposure and may result in ischemic injury to kidneys and visceral organs with higher morbidity and mortality compared with infrarenal AAAs. The four approaches to PRAAA repair are: 1) midline abdominal incision, transperitoneal, left renal vein divided or mobilized; 2) midline abdominal incision, transperitoneal, left medial visceral rotation technique 3) left flank incision, retroperitoneal; and 4) thoracoabdominal incision, thoracoretroperitoneal approach. The four positions of proximal clamping are: 1) suprarenal; 2) interrenal; 3) supramesenteric; and 4) supraceliac aorta. The surgical strategy should be determined based on computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography imaging, and severe atherosclerotic or calcified aorta should never be clamped to prevent lethal embolic complications. Although developing fenestrated endovascular technology can be used in some cases of PRAAA repair, open surgery with thorough preoperative assessment and careful utilization of techniques to prevent visceral and renal ischemic injury is safe, effective, and durable and remains the gold standard for repair.     

Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair is associated with lower perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with open repair for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms

ObjectiveThe Zenith Fenestrated Endovascular Graft (ZFEN; Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) has expanded the anatomic eligibility of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Current data on ZFEN mainly consist of single-institution experiences and show conflicting results. Therefore, we compared perioperative outcomes after repair using ZFEN with open complex AAA repair and infrarenal EVAR in a nationwide multicenter registry.MethodsWe identified all patients undergoing elective AAA repair using ZFEN, open complex AAA repair, and standard infrarenal EVAR between 2012 and 2016 within the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted vascular module. Open complex AAA repairs were defined as those with a juxtarenal or suprarenal proximal AAA extent in combination with an aortic cross-clamping position that was above at least one renal artery. The primary outcome was perioperative mortality, defined as death within 30 days or within the index hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included postoperative renal dysfunction (creatinine concentration increase of >2 mg/dL from preoperative value or new dialysis), occurrence of any complication, procedure times, blood transfusion rates, and length of stay. To account for baseline differences, we calculated propensity scores and employed inverse probability-weighted logistic regression.ResultsWe identified 6825 AAA repairs—220 ZFENs, 181 open complex AAA repairs, and 6424 infrarenal EVARs. Univariate analysis of ZFEN compared with open complex AAA repair demonstrated lower rates of perioperative mortality (1.8% vs 8.8%; P = .001), postoperative renal dysfunction (1.4% vs 7.7%; P = .002), and overall complications (11% vs 33%; P < .001). In addition, fewer patients undergoing ZFEN received blood transfusions (22% vs 73%; P < .001), and median length of stay was shorter (2 vs 7 days; P < .001). After adjustment, open complex AAA repair was associated with higher odds of perioperative mortality (odds ratio [OR], 4.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-18), postoperative renal dysfunction (OR, 13; 95% CI, 3.6-49), and overall complication rates (OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 2.3-7.5) compared with ZFEN. Compared with infrarenal EVAR, ZFEN presented comparable rates of perioperative mortality (1.8% vs 0.8%; P = .084), renal dysfunction (1.4% vs 0.7%; P = .19), and any complication (11% vs 7.7%; P = .09). Furthermore, after adjustment, there was no significant difference between the odds of perioperative mortality, postoperative renal dysfunction, or any complication between infrarenal EVAR and ZFEN.ConclusionsZFEN is associated with lower perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with open complex AAA repair, and outcomes are comparable to those of infrarenal EVAR. Long-term durability of ZFEN compared with open complex AAA repair warrants future research.     

腹主动脉瘤96例的诊断与手术治疗

摘要：目的 探讨腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的诊断、手术方式的选择及并发症的防治。方法 回顾性分析14年余收治的96例AAA的诊断和手术治疗的临床资料。对82例肾动脉水平以下型AAA行动脉瘤切除人工血管置换术，12例肾下型行涤纶片动脉瘤体包裹术，2例肾动脉上型腹主动脉假性动脉瘤行側壁瘤体切除修补术。结果 主动脉造影、MRA或EBT可确定动脉瘤上界与肾动脉间的距离。93例获得临床治愈。手术死亡3例，手术病死率3.1%(3/96)；其中急诊手术病死率50.0%(2/4)，限期手术病死率1.1%(1/92)，两者差异显著（P<0.05）。6例术后出现乙状结肠缺血症状，2例肢体远端有缺血症状，2例急性肾功能不全，均经非手术治疗痊愈。手术并发症发生率21.3％。82例获随访，随访时间6个月至15年。术后5年生存率为81.7%。 结论 AAA切除人工血管置换术是治疗AAA的基本方法。     

Preoperative glomerular filtration rate and outcome following open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) can be readily calculated from serum creatinine values. It is a more sensitive prognostic indicator than serum creatinine alone in patients undergoing thoracoabdominal or endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The value of eGFR in patients undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair remains unclear. The preoperative eGFR was calculated for patients undergoing elective open infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair. Postoperative complications, perioperative mortality, and long-term survival were compared across eGFR and serum creatinine quartiles. The eGFR identified preoperative renal dysfunction in 33% of patients, whereas serum creatinine identified renal impairment in only 11%. The eGFR correlated with perioperative morbidity and long-term survival. Serum creatinine did not correlate with perioperative mortality or long-term survival. However, it did correlate with postoperative morbidity. The eGFR is a more sensitive index of preoperative renal function than serum creatinine and correlates with survival. It should replace serum creatinine as the standard index of renal function before open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.     

The impact of race and insurance type on the outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair

BACKGROUND: Although mortality and complication rates for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) have declined over the last 20 years, operative complication rates and perioperative mortality are still high, specifically for repair of ruptures. The goal of this study was to determine the influence of insurance type and ethnicity while controlling for the influences of potential confounders on procedure selection and outcome following endovascular AAA repair (EVAR). METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we identified patients who underwent EVAR repair of ruptured and elective infrarenal AAA, between 1990 and 2003. Insurance type and ethnicity were analyzed against the primary outcome variables of mortality and major complications. The potential confounders of age, gender, operative location, diabetes, and Deyo index of comorbidities, were controlled. RESULTS: Bivariate analyses demonstrated significant differences between insurance types and ethnicity and mortality and complications. Patients who were self pay had adverse outcomes in comparison to Private insurance. Whites encountered less perioperative mortality and postoperative complications than Blacks and Hispanics. CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for previously identified associative factors for AAA outcome, ethnicity and insurance type does influence EVAR surgical outcome. Subsequent studies that break down emergent repair vs elective surgery and that longitudinally stratify delay in surgery, or time to admission may be useful.     

Extended use of endovascular aneurysm sealing: Chimneys for juxtarenal aneurysms

Hostile infrarenal aortic neck anatomy presents a challenge for the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Open surgical repair has been seen as the gold standard treatment for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm; however, endovascular techniques are now becoming more prevalent, particularly in patients deemed high risk for morbidity and mortality with open repair. The morphology of an aneurysm is a determinant of long-term outcomes, and short aneurysm necks are associated with poorer outcomes and a higher rate of secondary reinterventions. Parallel grafts have been used in combination with endovascular aneurysm repair to elongate the sealing zone into the paravisceral segment of the aorta. This technique is associated with a risk of proximal Type I endoleak due to “guttering.” This risk may be decreased when parallel grafts are used in combination with endovascular aneurysm sealing and, as such, this technique may represent an alternative to current techniques for the treatment of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm, such as the use of conventional bifurcated grafts (with or without parallel grafts) and fenestrated endovascular stent grafts.     

The incidence, natural history, and outcome of secondary intervention for persistent collateral flow in the excluded abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE: The goal of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is the prevention of rupture. Exclusion of the infrarenal AAA by means of operation or endovascular graft placement is an alternative therapy to achieve this goal. However, thrombosis of the excluded aneurysm sac does not always occur and further intervention may be needed. This study examines the efficacy of available screening methods to detect the persistence of aneurysm sac flow and the outcome of secondary procedures to treat this problem. METHODS: During the past 14 years, 1218 patients have undergone operative retroperitoneal exclusion of AAA. To date, 48 patients have been found to have persistent flow in the excluded AAA sac with duplex scanning. Twenty-seven patients underwent surgical intervention, and seven of these procedures were performed for rupture. Six patients have undergone treatment with interventional techniques (four successfully). The patients were evaluated for preoperative angiographic, anatomic, and comorbid factors that may have predisposed them to failed exclusion. Also, perioperative morbidity and mortality, estimated blood loss, and survival were assessed in the patients who required surgical treatment. RESULTS: There were no perioperative parameters that correlated with postoperative persistent flow in the excluded AAA sac. The mean time to secondary intervention was 51 months (range, 2 to 113 months). Two patients had false-negative computed tomographic angiogram results, eight patients had false-negative angiogram results, and six patients had duplex scan examinations that had initially negative results that were then positive for flow in sac. Reoperation had a 7.4% mortality rate (two deaths) and a median blood loss of 2600 mL, as compared with 500 mL for primary procedures. CONCLUSION: Secondary operations for patent excluded aortic aneurysm sacs have higher mortality and intraoperative blood loss rates than do primary procedures for AAA repair. The localization of branch leaks with computerized tomographic angiography, angiography, and duplex scanning were imprecise, and better methods are needed to adequately diagnose patent sacs. Expansion of AAA sac may be the only reliable factor.     

Sex differences in perioperative outcomes after complex abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

ObjectiveFemale sex is associated with worse outcomes after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. However, the impact of female sex on complex AAA repair is poorly characterized. Therefore, we compared outcomes between female and male patients after open and endovascular treatment of complex AAA.MethodsWe identified all patients who underwent complex aneurysm repair between 2011 and 2017 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted vascular module. Complex repairs were defined as those for juxtarenal, pararenal, or suprarenal aneurysms. We compared rates of perioperative adverse events between female and male patients stratified by open AAA repair and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). We calculated propensity scores and used inverse probability-weighted logistic regression to identify independent associations between female sex and our outcomes.ResultsWe identified 2270 complex aneurysm repairs, of which 1260 were EVARs (21.4% female) and 1010 were open repairs (30.7% female). After EVAR, female patients had higher rates of perioperative mortality (6.3% vs 2.4%; P = .001) and major complications (15.9% vs 7.6%; P < .001) compared with male patients. In contrast, after open repair, perioperative mortality was not significantly different (7.4% vs 5.6%; P = .3), and the rate of major complications was similar (29.4% vs 27.4%; P = .53) between female and male patients. Furthermore, even though perioperative mortality was significantly lower after EVAR compared with open repair for male patients (2.4% vs 5.6%; P = .001), this difference was not significant for women (6.3% vs 7.4%; P = .60). On multivariable analysis, female sex remained independently associated with higher perioperative mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-4.9; P = .007) and major complications (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3-3.2; P = .002) in patients treated with EVAR but showed no significant association with mortality (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.5-1.6; P = .69) or major complications (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8-1.5; P = .74) after open repair. However, the association of female sex with higher perioperative mortality in patients undergoing complex EVAR was attenuated when diameter was replaced with aortic size index in the multivariable analysis (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.9-3.9; P = .091).ConclusionsFemale sex is associated with higher perioperative mortality and more major complications than for male patients after complex EVAR but not after complex open repair. Continuous efforts are warranted to improve the sex discrepancies in patients undergoing endovascular repair of complex AAA.     

Extensive spinal cord ischemia following endovascular repair of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: a rare complication

Postoperative paraplegia secondary to spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is an extremely rare and devastating complication of endovascular repair in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery. The reported incidence is only 0.21 % worldwide. This case of postoperative paraplegia occurred in a 60-year-old man immediately following endovascular repair of an infrarenal AAA. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging showed multiple foci of SCI involvement from C5 to L1. However, neither cerebral spinal fluid drainage nor steroid therapy was effective; he was eventually admitted with no improvement in his neurological status. The mechanism remains multifactorial until now and needs more attention in perioperative management. We report the first case involved in the most significantly extensive SCI after endovascular repair of an infrarenal AAA.